Skip to main content
Physiological Genomics logoLink to Physiological Genomics
. 2010 Aug 17;42A(2):153–161. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00122.2010

Defining a rat blood pressure quantitative trait locus to a <81.8 kb congenic segment: comprehensive sequencing and renal transcriptome analysis

K Gopalakrishnan 1,*, J Saikumar 1,*, C G Peters 2, S Kumarasamy 1, P Farms 1, S Yerga-Woolwine 1, E J Toland 1, W Schnackel 1, D R Giovannucci 2, B Joe 1,
PMCID: PMC2957796  PMID: 20716646

Abstract

Evidence from multiple linkage and genome-wide association studies suggest that human chromosome 2 (HSA2) contains alleles that influence blood pressure (BP). Homologous to a large segment of HSA2 is rat chromosome 9 (RNO9), to which a BP quantitative trait locus (QTL) was previously mapped. The objective of the current study was to further resolve this BP QTL. Eleven congenic strains with introgressed segments spanning <81.8 kb to <1.33 Mb were developed by introgressing genomic segments of RNO9 from the Dahl salt-resistant (R) rat onto the genome of the Dahl salt-sensitive (S) rat and tested for BP. The congenic strain with the shortest introgressed segment spanning <81.8 kb significantly lowered BP of the hypertensive S rat by 25 mmHg and significantly increased its mean survival by 45 days. In contrast, two other congenic strains had increased BP compared with the S. We focused on the <81.8 kb congenic strain, which represents the shortest genomic segment to which a BP QTL has been mapped to date in any species. Sequencing of this entire region in both S and R rats detected 563 variants. The region did not contain any known or predicted rat protein coding genes. Furthermore, a whole genome renal transcriptome analysis between S and the <81.8 kb S.R congenic strain revealed alterations in several critical genes implicated in renal homeostasis. Taken together, our results provide the basis for future studies to examine the relationship between the candidate variants within the QTL region and the renal differentially expressed genes as potential causal mechanisms for BP regulation.

Keywords: microarray, variant, mapping, genome, chromosome


inheritance of hypertension in both humans and mammalian models is a well-established observation yet one of the most difficult to comprehend with respect to the causal elements on the genome. A recent thrust in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) has attempted to address this challenge by two measures, i.e., by increasing sample size and by increasing the density of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) analyzed. While these designs favor identification of additional loci associated with blood pressure (BP), such associations require further experimental validation for cause-effect relationships.

Rat models of hypertension are used to delineate the genetic contributions to BP. Evidence through classical linkage followed by substitution mapping are well recognized as proof for the existence of a BP quantitative trait locus (QTL) (79, 18, 19, 21, 22, 24, 26). We have utilized these approaches to compare and contrast the genome of the Dahl salt-sensitive (S) hypertensive strain with other inbred rat strains (18, 19). The current study is one such sustained genetic analysis of rat chromosome 9 (RNO9) conducted for 11 yr using congenic strains derived by introgressing genomic segments of the Dahl salt-resistant (R) rat onto the genetic background of the S rat (11, 25, 34). This study has resulted in the identification of <81.8 kb on RNO9 within which a BP QTL could be defined. The corresponding region in humans has been mapped by linkage in multiple ethnic human cohorts (1, 15, 31).

The significance of our report is that it is the first detailed mapping of a BP QTL to this high resolution following linkage analysis (34). Importantly, the short <81.8 kb segment is represented by a single minimal S.R congenic strain and does not contain any known rat protein coding genes. In addition to the congenic mapping, sequence analysis of the entire critical region combined with a whole genome renal transcriptome analysis between the S and the <81.8 kb congenic region are presented.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals.

All animals were cared for as per approved protocols by the University of Toledo Health Science Campus Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC), and all animal study protocols were reviewed and approved by the IACUC. S rats were from our animal colony. The congenic substrains for this study were derived from either S.R(9)×3×2C or S.R(D9Mco95-Resp18), which was previously referred to as S.R(9)×3×2B×1(11). In brief, the parental congenic strain was crossed with S to generate a population of F1 animals. These F1 animals were then intercrossed to generate an F2 population. The F2 animals were genotyped using microsatellite markers throughout the region on RNO9 from 73140156–74554694 (Fig. 1). The recombinant F2 animals with various introgressed regions of the R alleles were backcrossed with S to “trap” the recombinant chromosome, genotyped, and intercrossed to obtain animals that are homozygous for the introgressed R region on the S genomic background.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Substitution mapping of rat chromosome 9 (RNO9). Polymorphic microsatellite markers along with their locations on the rat genome according to the Ensembl database (http://www.ensembl.org, Nov. 2009) are shown to the left. Congenic strains are represented as colored bars: green, strains that lowered blood pressure (BP) of the S rat; black, strains that increased the BP of the S rat; and grey, strains that did not show a change in BP compared with the S. White boxes flanking the colored bars are regions of recombination. The BP effect of each strain is given at the bottom except for S.R(D9Mco95-Resp18), the data for which have been previously published. Details of the effects are given in Table 1. S, Dahl salt sensitive; R. Dahl salt resistant; S.R, congenic strains.

BP measurements.

Each set of congenic substrains (n = 20 males) and control S rats (n = 20 males) were bred, housed, and studied concomitantly to minimize environmental effects. Rats were weaned at 30 days of age and given a low-salt diet (0.3% NaCl, Harlan Teklad). At 40–42 days of age rats were fed 2% NaCl diet (Harlan Teklad) for 24 days. Systolic BP was measured using the tail-cuff method commencing on the 25th day (4). Briefly, conscious restrained rats were warmed to 28°C. The BP of each rat was measured for 4 consecutive days by two blinded operators. BP values for each day were the mean of three or four consistent readings. The final BP value used was the mean of the four daily BP values. The day after the last BP measurements, rats were euthanized and heart weights were recorded.

BP was also collected using a telemetry system (Data Sciences International, St. Paul, MN) as explained in detail previously (20). Briefly, 4 days after the BP measurements by the tail cuff method, rats S (n = 10) and congenic rats (n = 11) were surgically implanted with transmitters into the left flanks, and the probes were inserted through each animal's femoral artery and advanced to the lower abdominal aorta. Rats were allowed to recover from surgery for 1 wk before the transmitters were turned on and BP data were collected for 4 consecutive days. All statistical analyses were as previously reported (20).

Urinary protein excretion.

We fed 40-day-old S and S.R(D9Mco95-D9Mco98) rats (n = 18/group) with 2% NaCl diet (Harlan Teklad diet) for 12 days. On day 13 these animals were caged individually in metabolic cages (Lab Products, Seaford, DE) with free access to water to collect urine samples. Urine was collected in the presence of ∼0.01% sodium azide over a period of 24 h, and their volumes were recorded. Total protein and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels were analyzed using an automated analyzer at the Department of Pathology, University of Toledo College of Medicine.

Survival studies.

S (n = 7) and S.R(D9Mco95-D9Mco98) (n = 7) rats were raised and administered 2% salt as described under the BP measurements. These rats were continued on the 2% salt diet until their death. Data collected were analyzed statistically using the SPSS software.

Isolation of DNA and genotyping.

DNA was extracted from rat tail tissue samples in 96-well formats using the Wizard SV 96 Genomic DNA purification system (Promega). Polymorphic microsatellite markers between S and R within the desired genomic segment were PCR amplified from tail DNA samples and resolved on acrylamide gels as per previously published procedures (37).

Sequencing.

Primers were designed to amplify PCR products that were ∼800–1100 bp covering the entire 81.8 kb region (http://frodo.wi.mit.edu/primer3/). Each primer was attached with an M13 tag. A list of primer sequences is provided in the Supplementary Table S1.1 These custom primers were synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies and used for PCR amplification of genomic DNA from three each of S and S.R(D9Mco95-D9Mco98) congenic rats. Amplified products were subsequently purified using the Qiagen PCR purification kit. The purified products were sequenced using both forward and reverse M13 primers by MWG sequencing services. Sequences thus obtained were analyzed using the software Sequencher (Gene Codes v. 4.9). Sequences were aligned using genomic DNA sequence of Brown Norway (BN) rat as the reference genome. The BN rat sequence was obtained from the Ensembl website (rat RGSC 3.4 assembly at http://www.ensembl.org).

RNA isolation and RT-PCR amplification of expressed sequence tags from S and R rats.

Kidney, brain, and heart samples were collected from 8 wk old S and R rats. RNA was isolated by the TRIzol method as per recommended procedures (TRIzol, Invitrogen). Concentration of RNA was determined using Nanodrop 2000C. We used 2 μg of RNA for reverse transcription to cDNA using Superscript III (Invitrogen) followed by PCR using two sets of primers designed manually to amplify the overlapping expressed sequence tags (ESTs): CB585071, CB581681, CB750247, AA874825, and AI599340. The primer sequences were as follows: sense primer 1 5′ATGAATGGTAGTTATCTACAAATAG3′ and antisense primer 1 5′GGCCTACAAGTTTTAATACTAACAT3′; sense primer 2 5′GATATGTAGCTCAGTGGTAAAATGT3′ and antisense primer 2 5′CAAGCGCTCTACCACTGAGCTAAAT3′.

GeneChip microarray experiment and data analysis.

Six S and 6 S.R(D9Mco95-D9Mco98) rats were randomly selected from the group of animals used for urine collection described above. The day after urine collection, these rats were euthanized for isolation of kidneys. RNA was isolated from the kidneys using TRIzol and RNeasy kits (Qiagen). The isolated RNA from two animals were pooled together and considered as one biological sample. Three such RNA samples from S and congenic rats were used for the cRNA preparation. cRNA was prepared and fragmented as suggested by the Affymetrix technical manual and simultaneously hybridized (15 μg adjusted cRNA for each chip) to Rat Expression Array 230 2.0 (3′ IVT Expression Analysis). Statistical analyses of the microarray data were performed using R statistical package (version 2.8.1), and the data were further analyzed using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis software. The microarray dataset at the Gene Expression Omnibus database is assigned the accession number GSE22515.

RESULTS

R rat alleles within 81.8 kb decrease BP of the S rat.

A total of 11 new congenic substrains were developed for this study as detailed in materials and methods (Fig. 1). Only one of the 11 congenic substrains had a significant lowering effect on BP. The congenic strain S.R(D9Mco95-D9Mco98), which demonstrated the BP lowering effect of −25 mmHg (P < 0.001, Table 1) compared with S, had a very short introgressed segment of <81.8 kb (Fig. 1). The BP effect of S.R(D9Mco95-D9Mco98) was also tested by the telemetry method. The systolic, diastolic, and mean BP of this strain was significantly lower than that of the S as measured by telemetry (P < 0.001, Fig. 2). Heart weights of S.R(D9Mco95-D9Mco98) (1.25 ± 0.034) were significantly lower than that of the S (1.37 ± 0.018) (P = 0.003).

Table 1.

Observed effects of rat chromosome 9 congenic strains on systolic BP

Blood Pressure, mmHg
Congenic Strain n S Congenic Effect t-Test
S.R(D9Mco72-Resp18) 30 220 [3.34] 220 [2.90] 0 0.988
S.R(D9Mco14-Resp18-1) 30 212 [4.52] 209 [5.13] −3 0.969
S.R(D9Mco14-Resp18-2) 20 208 [4.08] 206 [3.54] −2 0.905
S.R(D9Mco14-Resp18-3) 20 212 [4.52] 211 [7.66] −1 1.000
S.R(D9Mco95-D9Mco98) 20 219 [4.43] 194 [4.74] −25 <0.001
S.R(D9Mco98-Resp18-1) 19 190 [6.32] 208 [5.87] 18 0.044
S.R(D9Mco98-Resp18-2) 20 199 [5.19] 217 [4.71] 18 0.032
S.R(D9Mco95-D9Mco100-1) 20 204 [4.97] 208 [4.68] 4 0.533
S.R(D9Mco95-D9Mco100-2) 20 219 [4.43] 212 [3.35] −7 0.638
S.R(D9Mco95-D9Mco102) 20 199 [5.19] 203 [4.75] 4 0.789
S.R(D9Mco101-Resp18) 20 208 [4.08] 203 [4.31] −5 0.641

Blood pressure (BP) values are means ± SE. Effect, congenic value–Dahl salt-sensitive (S) value. Negative values indicate a decrease in BP compared with the S rat, whereas positive values indicate an increase in BP compared with the S rat. Only male rats were used. Independent t-test was used to compare the means when only 2 strains were in an experiment and ANOVA was used to compare the means when there were more than 2 strains in a single experiment.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

BP effect of the quantitative trait locus (QTL) region detected by radiotelemetry. We surgically implanted 10 S (♦) and 11 S.R(D9Mco95-D9Mco98) congenic (◊) rats with C40 telemetry transmitters, allowed to them to recover for 4 days, and recorded BP over a period of 4 days. The data plotted were obtained by telemetry recording once every 5 min continuously and averaged for 4 h intervals. Data for all parameters were significantly different between S and congenic rats (T test, P < 0.001).

Alleles of the R rat adjacent to the 81.8 kb region increase BP of the S rat.

A 1.33 Mb interval distal to the <81.8 kb region on RNO9 described above is represented by two of the congenic strains, S.R(D9Mco98-Resp18-1) and S.R(D9Mco98-Resp18-2). BP of both of these strains was significantly higher than that of the S by 18 mmHg (P = 0.044 and 0.032, respectively) (Fig. 1, Table 1). These strains do not overlap with S.R(D9Mco95-D9Mco98), which lowers BP. The BP of the other nine strains shown in Fig. 1 was not significantly different from that of the S.

Congenic rats with R alleles in the 81.8 kb region survive longer than the S.

In addition to having lower BP compared with the S, the S.R(D9Mco95-D9Mco98) congenic rats survived significantly longer than the S (Fig. 3). The mean survival of the S.R(D9Mco95-D9Mco98) congenic rats was 137 days, whereas that of the S rat was 92 days. The difference in survival of 45 days was highly significant (P = 0.0004).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Kaplan-Meier plot. Animals were fed with 2% dietary salt (NaCl) and allowed to live until their natural death. Survival analysis was performed using the Graph pad Prism software (http://www.graphpad.com/prism/Prism.htm). Survival of S is significantly different from that of the congenic strain [log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test, P = 0.0004].

The <81.8 kb critical region.

The <81.8 kb critical region in the context of the logarithm of the odds (LOD) plot obtained by linkage analysis of S and R rats and subsequent substitution mapping studies is shown in Fig. 4. This region lies between 73140156 and 73221915 bp on the q33 cytogenetic band of RNO9 and is homologous to 218561830–218650679 bp on human chromosome 2q35 and 73856916–73949046 bp on mouse chromosome 1. VISTA plots suggest that there are stretches of evolutionarily conserved sequences across mammals within this region (supplementary Fig. S1). There is one reported variant within the critical <81.8 kb region between S and R (G/C, ENSRNOSNP2795799 at 73186288 bp, http://snplotyper.mcw.edu). Sequencing of the <81.8 kb region detected 563 allelic variants between S and R including the reported SNP (Supplemental Table S2). The <81.8 kb region of S.R(D9Mco95-D9Mco98) contains no rat protein coding gene annotations but has six ESTs. One of the six ESTs, BF397395, contains two SNPs between S and R at 73160114 and 73160151 (Supplementary Table S2), but this EST does not align with any known genes in any species. The remaining five ESTS are overlapping. Interestingly, all the five overlapping ESTs were located within a 640 bp genomic segment on RNO9, which was identical to a genomic segment between 57762964 and 57763603 bp on RNO2 except at two loci, i.e., T on RNO2 at 57763252 to G on RNO9 at 73206976 and T on RNO2 at 57763416 to G on RNO9 at 73207139. Since all the five overlapping ESTs were assembled only on RNO9 (none on RNO2), we designed primers to amplify any expressed sequences from cDNA of both S and R rats, anticipating amplification of sequences that matched the nucleotides on RNO9, i.e., G on RNO9 at 73206976 and G on RNO9 at 73207139. Instead, sequencing of the PCR products revealed that all the ESTs amplified from both S and R rats contained T on RNO2 at 57763252 and T on RNO2 at 57763416, suggesting that these ESTs listed on RNO9 may indeed be transcribed from RNO2 but not from RNO9. 5′-RACE experiments were designed to amplify extended transcripts from each of these ESTs. While the positive control resulted in amplification of the entire transcript of GAPDH, there were no products obtained from any of the ESTs. These results are in concordance with the observation that there are no reported protein coding genes identified by comparative mapping with the mouse genome. However, the homologous region on human chromosome 2 contains a gene, DIRC3 (disrupted in renal carcinoma 3, Entrez Gene ID: 729582). The protein coding sequence of human DIRC3 has 4 exons. Only the fourth exon has two alignments with 83–90% homology to two stretches of sequences within the <81.8 kb region (73146699–73146745 and 73146751–73146792, respectively). The critical region does not contain any known miRNAs but contains several SINE and LINE elements as reported by the UCSC browser (http://genome.ucsc.edu). Some of these elements are highly conserved between rat, mouse, and human (Supplementary Fig. S1). There are four gaps in the reference sequence assembly of the <81.8 kb region. These are between 73178596 and 73178645 bp, 73187710 and 73187759 bp, 73206637 and 73206686 bp, and 73209272 and 73209321 bp (http://genome.ucsc.edu).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Comprehensive representation of BP QTL mapping on RNO9. Logarithm of the odds (LOD) plot for BP using the F2 (S × R) population is shown at the top followed by the congenic strains constructed to map the QTL. All iterations of substitution mapping are shown by congenic strains with 1) BP lowering effect of the S rat BP shown in green, 2) BP increasing effect of the S rat BP shown in black, and 3) the ones without the BP lowering effect shown in gray. Markers shown flank the congenic segment and are of the S genotype.

Renal transcriptome analysis.

Young, S.R(D9Mco95-D9Mco98) congenic rats that were 54 days of age had an early trend for lower total urinary protein and BUN levels (54.9 and 96.15 mg/ml/day, respectively) compared with the S (80.5 and 145.2 mg/ml/day, respectively). We therefore examined early changes in the renal transcriptomes between the S and S.R(D9Mco95-D9Mco98) congenic rats. Whole genome microarray analysis of S and S.R(D9Mco95-D9Mco98) revealed that >1,000 genes were differentially expressed. The top list of up- and downregulated genes is given in Table 2. The most upregulated gene (10-fold) in the kidney of the congenic strain was aldo-keto reductase family 1, member B7 (Akr1b7) (Table 2). Akr1b7 was associated with a network involved in acute phase/inflammatory response signaling including transcripts of heat shock proteins (Hspa1a, Hspa1b, Hsph1); Serpine1, complement factor B (Cfb); Stanniocalcin-1 (Stc1), a known renal protective anti-inflammatory molecule (16, 45); Gremlin-1 (Grem1), associated with TGF-β signaling and kidney development; and another member number C14 of the aldo-keto reductase family 1 (Akr1c14) (Fig. 5). The most downregulated transcript in the congenic strain compared with the S was uncoupling protein 1 (Ucp1). Other downregulated genes are listed in Table 2. Pathway analysis points to downregulation of at least eight transcripts (Table 2) in a network associated with several renal phenotypes (Fig. 6).

Table 2.

Differentially expressed genes in the kidneys of S.R(D9Mco95-D9Mco98) compared with S

Probe Set ID Fold-change P Value Gene Description
1368569_at 10.450 0.0283 Akr1b7 aldo-keto reductase family 1, member B7
1396101_at 2.051 0.0296 Stc1 stanniocalcin 1
1368247_at 2.050 0.0008 Hspa1a heat shock 70 kDa protein 1A
1377404_at 1.854 0.0073 Stc1 stanniocalcin 1
1370912_at 1.733 0.0005 Hspa1b heat shock 70 kDa protein 1B (mapped)
1385620_at 1.568 0.0105 Hsph1 heat shock 105 kDa/110 kDa protein 1
1370708_a_at 1.699 0.0071 Akr1c14 aldo-keto reductase family 1, member C14
1396933_s_at 1.548 0.0144 Akr1c14 aldo-keto reductase family 1, member C14
1368519_at 1.534 0.0080 Serpine1 serine (or cysteine) peptidase inhibitor, clade E, member 1
1389470_at 1.511 0.0213 Cfb complement factor B
1369113_at 1.505 0.0015 Grem1 gremlin 1, cysteine knot superfamily, homolog (Xenopus laevis)
1390596_at 1.500 0.0012 Mlana melan-A
1383302_at 1.493 0.0030 Dnajb1 DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily B, member 1
1387033_at −1.975 0.0414 Ucp1 uncoupling protein 1 (mitochondrial, proton carrier)
1369732_a_at −1.664 0.0079 St3 gal2 ST3 beta-galactoside alpha-2,3-sialyltransferase 2
1370052_at −1.484 0.0133 Pdpk1 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1
1375552_at −1.481 0.0213 Srp72 signal recognition particle 72
1392592_at −1.456 0.0467 LOC679869 similar to transcription factor 7-like 2, T-cell specific, HMG-box
1371248_at −1.426 0.0052 Sprr1al small proline-rich protein 1A-like
1393663_at −1.418 0.0187 Slc36a2 solute carrier family 36 (proton/amino acid symporter), member 2
1377532_at −1.399 0.0177 RGD1305020 similar to hepatocellular carcinoma-associated antigen 58 homolog
1368397_at −1.369 0.0091 Ugt2b36 UDP glucuronosyltransferase 2 family, polypeptide B36
1383974_at −1.365 0.0075 Elf5 E74-like factor 5

For the purpose of comparison, S rat array sets were arbitrarily assigned as the base line and the S.R(D9Mco95-D9Mco98) (congenic rat) array sets as the experimental arrays. Thus, a positive number for fold-change indicates that the expression in the congenic strain was higher than that in the S and a negative number indicates that the expression in the congenic strain was lower than that in the S.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

The list of upregulated genes in the congenic strain compared with S given in Table 2 were modeled using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. Upregulated genes are shown in shades of red based on the fold-change in expression.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

The list of downregulated genes in the congenic strain compared with S given in Table 2 were modeled using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. Downregulated genes are shown in shades of green based on the fold-change in expression.

DISCUSSION

Genetic analysis of inherited hypertension in humans has largely expanded in recent years through large-scale GWAS. Results from multiple methods to assess the genomic risk for development of hypertension including whole genome (2, 28, 30, 42, 47), haplotypic (3), and pathway-based (44) GWAS analyses and gene-based analyses (42, 47) converge with strong evidence to suggest that genetic contributions to BP is largely explained by a previously underestimated number of alleles, most lacking major effects per se. Modeling genetics of hypertension in rats has indicated a similar scenario (7, 9, 13, 18, 19, 22, 33, 43). Ascertaining whether the contribution of a locus to BP is causal or consequential is crucial to understanding the etiology of hypertension. This has not been achieved by any other means to date other than by substitution mapping (5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 21, 32, 35) . The current study represents one such sustained, rigorous substitution mapping of a BP QTL on RNO9, which has resulted in “trapping” alleles of the R rat on the S rat genetic background that results in lowering of BP compared with that of the S rat. The significance of this study is that the critical mapped segment of <81.8 kb is unparalleled in terms of 1) resolution of mapping BP QTLs that are the sole introgressed segments within congenic strains; 2) the introgressed segment not containing any known rat protein coding genes; 3) sequencing of a critical QTL interval for identifying candidate variants; and 4) renal transcriptome depicting alterations in renal homeostasis.

While the current mapping study provides evidence for the presence of a BP QTL between S and R rats within a very short segment of <81.8 kb, it also suggests that there are additional, yet undetected allelic variants of S and R as BP QTLs on RNO9. Two of the strains shown in Fig. 1 that possess R alleles other than within the <81.8 kb region increase BP of the S rat. This indicates the presence of at least one other R allele in the immediate vicinity of the <81.8 kb region, which has an opposite effect of increasing BP of the S rat.

In a previous report (11), a 117 kb region on RNO9 between 74.584 (D9Mco14) and 74.701 Mb (Resp18-Intron 2) was prioritized as the BP QTL based on this region being shared between two congenic strains [S.R(D9Mco95-Resp18) and S.R(9)x3x2C], both of which demonstrated a BP lowering effect. This method of mapping is described as the common-segment method by a recent report (38). However, congenic strains that were constructed either to span or to represent segments within the 117 kb region did not validate this localization [Fig. 1, S.R(D9Mco72-Resp18), S.R(D9Mco14-Resp18-1), S.R(D9Mco14-Resp18-2) or S.R(D9Mco14-Resp18-3)]. Our data therefore clearly support the demerits of the common-segment method of mapping QTLs using congenic strains (38) and suggest that BP lowering effect of the two congenic strains S.R(D9Mco95-Resp18) and S.R(9)×3×2C is attributed to the R alleles that are not common between the two strains. The finding of a BP lowering effect demonstrated by a substrain of S.R(D9Mco95-Resp18), i.e., S.R(D9Mco95-D9Mco98), which does not share R alleles with S.R(9)×3×2C, supports this interpretation.

Another interesting observation is that, similar to a previous substitution mapping study from our laboratory, the location of the critical <81.8 kb region (Fig. 4) is not within the confidence interval of the LOD peak for linkage to BP detected in the original analysis between S and R rats. The reasons for this are detailed elsewhere (21) and also applicable to the current study. Briefly, this observation suggests that the LOD peak is configured as a “ghost” peak generated between at least two adjacent QTLs instead of directly over either one of the QTLs (14, 23, 46), once again providing evidence for the existence of more than one BP QTL on RNO9.

Congenic strains continue to be used extensively to map several complex traits. It should be mentioned, however, that congenic strains are not devoid of residual heterozygosity or passenger cryptic loci (40, 41). The minimal congenic strain reported in our study has undergone a total of 18 backcrosses. Nevertheless, it is still possible that residual heterozygosity may also be contributing to the observed phenotype. In evaluating the applicability of congenic strains, Shao et al. (38) have recently proposed a sequential method as being a better method than the common-segment method. Both of these methods compare and contrast introgressed segments of two congenic strains to locate the QTL. Given that a number of QTL mapping studies are reporting the identification of multiple closely linked QTLs, some with opposing effects and/or epistasis, our view is that both the common-segment method and the sequential method ultimately require proof with minimal congenic strains such as the <81.8 kb congenic strain described in the current study.

Most, if not all, of the genetic studies of hypertension are typically conducted with a “gene-centric” view, i.e., focused on finding candidate protein coding genes as candidate BP QTLs. However, GWAS of hypertension in humans suggest that variants associated with BP are not necessarily all within protein coding genes. Although our study is by no means exhaustive so as to completely exclude the presence of a rat protein coding gene within the critical interval, the current observation of localization of a rat BP QTL to a region with very limited evidence for the presence of a protein coding gene lends support to noncoding variants to be also examined closely as BP QTLs within the critical <81.8 kb region.

The homologous regions of the <81.8 kb region lies on chromosomes 1 and 2 of mice and humans, respectively (Fig. 4). There are no GWAS that point to the homologous region of the rat <81.8 kb critical region as regions associated with BP. However, among the human linkage studies that point to HSA2, LOD peaks reported for BP in the Samoans (1), Amish (15), and, to some extent, the Finnish (31) populations are in the homologous region of the rat <81.8 kb BP QTL. Although the rat data, as per the current predictions, do not indicate a protein-coding candidate gene, the homologous human segment contains a gene, DIRC3, and therefore it cannot be excluded as a candidate for the homologous human BP QTL. The function of DIRC3 is unknown. Subtractive hybridization or RNA capture in sequence-capture chips needs to be applied to this project to detect any genes that are not yet annotated.

Proteinuria between the S and S.R(D9Mco95-D9Mco98) was not significantly different but only had a decreased trend in the congenic strain compared with S. Because this was observed in young, 54-day-old rats, it was possible that early changes in the kidney transcriptome could reflect on pathways that are affected by the BP QTL. The results suggested that some molecules involved in the renal acute phase/inflammatory response (17, 27, 29, 36, 39, 45) and other renal phenotypes were differentially expressed. It is admittedly quite difficult to interpret these data as the causative pathway due to the limited nature of examination of all other organs and tissues involved in BP regulation. Further, extensive work will be required to understand the mechanism of action of the fine-mapped BP QTL.

Overall, the mapping and extensive sequencing results of the current study provide the basis for future studies on variants detected within the minimal congenic BP QTL region to be explored as novel candidate quantitative trait nucleotides (QTNs). This study provides evidence for localization of a BP QTL to a high degree of resolution. Further resolving the mapped <81.8 kb region solely by the congenic approach is clearly not an expeditious approach. While bioinformatic methods may suggest new protein-coding gene annotations in future or predict potential functionality of noncoding elements, functional testing of such elements as BP QTLs would require the development and application of complementary genetic engineering approaches such as transgenesis, zinc finger nuclease-based knock-out, or knock-in models to test the variants within the critical interval as BP QTNs.

GRANTS

This work was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grants HL-020176 and HL-076709 (to B. Joe).

DISCLOSURES

No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the author(s).

Supplementary Material

Figure S1
figS1.pdf (108.7KB, pdf)
Table S1
tableS1.pdf (127.5KB, pdf)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank the Rat Genome Database team for support with bioinformatic analysis.

Footnotes

1

The online version of this article contains supplemental material.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Aberg K, Dai F, Viali S, Tuitele J, Sun G, Indugula SR, Deka R, Weeks DE, McGarvey ST. Suggestive linkage detected for blood pressure related traits on 2q and 22q in the population on the Samoan islands. BMC Med Genet 10: 107, 2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Adeyemo A, Gerry N, Chen G, Herbert A, Doumatey A, Huang H, Zhou J, Lashley K, Chen Y, Christman M, Rotimi C. A genome-wide association study of hypertension and blood pressure in African Americans. PLoS Genet 5: e1000564, 2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Browning BL, Browning SR. Haplotypic analysis of Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium data. Hum Genet 123: 273–280, 2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Bunag R, Butterfield J. Tail-cuff blood pressure measurement without external preheating in awake rats. Hypertension 4: 898–903, 1982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cicila GT, Garrett MR, Lee SJ, Liu J, Dene H, Rapp JP. High-resolution mapping of the blood pressure QTL on chromosome 7 using Dahl rat congenic strains. Genomics 72: 51–60, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Clemitson JR, Dixon RJ, Haines S, Bingham AJ, Patel BR, Hall L, Lo M, Sassard J, Charchar FJ, Samani NJ. Genetic dissection of a blood pressure quantitative trait locus on rat chromosome 1 and gene expression analysis identifies SPON1 as a novel candidate hypertension gene. Circ Res 100: 992–999, 2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cowley AW., Jr The genetic dissection of essential hypertension. Nat Rev Genet 7: 829–840, 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cowley AW, Jr, Liang M, Roman RJ, Greene AS, Jacob HJ. Consomic rat model systems for physiological genomics. Acta Physiol Scand 181: 585–592, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Deng AY. Genetic basis of polygenic hypertension. Hum Mol Genet 16: R195–202, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Deng AY. Positional cloning of quantitative trait Loci for blood pressure: how close are we?: a critical perspective. Hypertension 49: 740–747, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Garrett MR, Meng H, Rapp JP, Joe B. Locating a blood pressure quantitative trait locus within 117 kb on the rat genome: substitution mapping and renal expression analysis. Hypertension 45: 451–459, 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Garrett MR, Rapp JP. Defining the blood pressure QTL on chromosome 7 in Dahl rats by a 177kb congenic segment containing Cyp11b1. Mamm Genome 14: 268–273, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Graham D, McBride MW, Brain NJ, Dominiczak AF. Congenic/consomic models of hypertension. Methods Mol Med 108: 3–15, 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Haley CS, Knott SA. A simple regression method for mapping quantitative trait loci in line crosses using flanking markers. Heredity 69: 315–324, 1992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hsueh WC, Mitchell BD, Schneider JL, Wagner MJ, Bell CJ, Nanthakumar E, Shuldiner AR. QTL influencing blood pressure maps to the region of PPH1 on chromosome 2q31-34 in Old Order Amish. Circulation 101: 2810–2816, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Huang L, Garcia G, Lou Y, Zhou Q, Truong LD, DiMattia G, Lan XR, Lan HY, Wang Y, Sheikh-Hamad D. Anti-inflammatory and renal protective actions of stanniocalcin-1 in a model of anti-glomerular basement membrane glomerulonephritis. Am J Pathol 174: 1368–1378, 2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ishizaka N, Aizawa T, Ohno M, Usui Si S, Mori I, Tang SS, Ingelfinger JR, Kimura S, Nagai R. Regulation and localization of HSP70 and HSP25 in the kidney of rats undergoing long-term administration of angiotensin II. Hypertension 39: 122–128, 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Joe B, Garrett MR. Genetic analysis of inherited hypertension in the rat. In: Genetics of Hypertension, edited by Dominiczak A, Connell J. Amsterdam,The Netherlands: Elsevier Science, 2006, p. 177–200. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Joe B, Garrett MR. Substitution mapping: Using congenic strains to detect genes controlling blood pressure. In: Cardiovascular Genomics, edited by Raizada MK, Paton JRF, Kasparov S, Katovich MJ. Totowa, NJ: Humana, 2005, p. 41–58. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Joe B, Garrett MR, Dene H, Rapp JP. Substitution mapping of a blood pressure quantitative trait locus to a 2.73 Mb region on rat chromosome 1. J Hypertens 21: 2077–2084, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Joe B, Saad Y, Lee NH, Frank BC, Achinike OH, Luu TV, Gopalakrishnan K, Toland EJ, Farms P, Yerga-Woolwine S, Manickavasagam E, Rapp JP, Garrett MR, Coe D, Apte SS, Rankinen T, Perusse L, Ehret GB, Ganesh SK, Cooper RS, O'Connor A, Rice T, Weder AB, Chakravarti A, Rao DC, Bouchard C. Positional identification of variants of Adamts16 linked to inherited hypertension. Hum Mol Genet 18: 2825–2838, 2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Liang M, Lee NH, Wang H, Greene AS, Kwitek AE, Kaldunski ML, Luu TV, Frank BC, Bugenhagen S, Jacob HJ, Cowley AW., Jr Molecular networks in Dahl salt-sensitive hypertension based on transcriptome analysis of a panel of consomic rats. Physiol Genomics 34: 54–64, 2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Martinez O. Spurious linkage between markers in QTL mapping. Mol Breed 2: 351–358, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mattson DL, Dwinell MR, Greene AS, Kwitek AE, Roman RJ, Cowley AW, Jr, Jacob HJ. Chromosomal mapping of the genetic basis of hypertension and renal disease in FHH rats. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 293: F1905–F1914, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Meng H, Garrett MR, Dene H, Rapp JP. Localization of a blood pressure QTL to a 2.4-cM interval on rat chromosome 9 using congenic strains. Genomics 81: 210–220, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Moreno C, Dumas P, Kaldunski ML, Tonellato PJ, Greene AS, Roman RJ, Cheng Q, Wang Z, Jacob HJ, Cowley AW., Jr Genomic map of cardiovascular phenotypes of hypertension in female Dahl S rats. Physiol Genomics 15: 243–257, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Nakamura J, Fujimoto M, Yasuda K, Takeda K, Akira S, Hatayama T, Takagi Y, Nozaki K, Hosokawa N, Nagata K. Targeted disruption of Hsp110/105 gene protects against ischemic stress. Stroke 39: 2853–2859, 2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Newton-Cheh C, Johnson T, Gateva V, Tobin MD, Bochud M, Coin L, Najjar SS, Zhao JH, Heath SC, Eyheramendy S, Papadakis K, Voight BF, Scott LJ, Zhang F, Farrall M, Tanaka T, Wallace C, Chambers JC, Khaw KT, Nilsson P, van der Harst P, Polidoro S, Grobbee DE, Onland-Moret NC, Bots ML, Wain LV, Elliott KS, Teumer A, Luan J, Lucas G, Kuusisto J, Burton PR, Hadley D, McArdle WL, Brown M, Dominiczak A, Newhouse SJ, Samani NJ, Webster J, Zeggini E, Beckmann JS, Bergmann S, Lim N, Song K, Vollenweider P, Waeber G, Waterworth DM, Yuan X, Groop L, Orho-Melander M, Allione A, Di Gregorio A, Guarrera S, Panico S, Ricceri F, Romanazzi V, Sacerdote C, Vineis P, Barroso I, Sandhu MS, Luben RN, Crawford GJ, Jousilahti P, Perola M, Boehnke M, Bonnycastle LL, Collins FS, Jackson AU, Mohlke KL, Stringham HM, Valle TT, Willer CJ, Bergman RN, Morken MA, Doring A, Gieger C, Illig T, Meitinger T, Org E, Pfeufer A, Wichmann HE, Kathiresan S, Marrugat J, O'Donnell CJ, Schwartz SM, Siscovick DS, Subirana I, Freimer NB, Hartikainen AL, McCarthy MI, O'Reilly PF, Peltonen L, Pouta A, de Jong PE, Snieder H, van Gilst WH, Clarke R, Goel A, Hamsten A, Peden JF, Seedorf U, Syvanen AC, Tognoni G, Lakatta EG, Sanna S, Scheet P, Schlessinger D, Scuteri A, Dorr M, Ernst F, Felix SB, Homuth G, Lorbeer R, Reffelmann T, Rettig R, Volker U, Galan P, Gut IG, Hercberg S, Lathrop GM, Zelenika D, Deloukas P, Soranzo N, Williams FM, Zhai G, Salomaa V, Laakso M, Elosua R, Forouhi NG, Volzke H, Uiterwaal CS, van der Schouw YT, Numans ME, Matullo G, Navis G, Berglund G, Bingham SA, Kooner JS, Connell JM, Bandinelli S, Ferrucci L, Watkins H, Spector TD, Tuomilehto J, Altshuler D, Strachan DP, Laan M, Meneton P, Wareham NJ, Uda M, Jarvelin MR, Mooser V, Melander O, Loos RJ, Elliott P, Abecasis GR, Caulfield M, Munroe PB. Genome-wide association study identifies eight loci associated with blood pressure. Nat Genet 41: 666–676, 2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Oelkrug R, Kutschke M, Meyer CW, Heldmaier G, Jastroch M. Uncoupling protein 1 decreases superoxide production in brown adipose tissue mitochondria. J Biol Chem. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Org E, Eyheramendy S, Juhanson P, Gieger C, Lichtner P, Klopp N, Veldre G, Doring A, Viigimaa M, Sober S, Tomberg K, Eckstein G, Kelgo P, Rebane T, Shaw-Hawkins S, Howard P, Onipinla A, Dobson RJ, Newhouse SJ, Brown M, Dominiczak A, Connell J, Samani N, Farrall M, Caulfield MJ, Munroe PB, Illig T, Wichmann HE, Meitinger T, Laan M. Genome-wide scan identifies CDH13 as a novel susceptibility locus contributing to blood pressure determination in two European populations. Hum Mol Genet 18: 2288–2296, 2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Perola M, Kainulainen K, Pajukanta P, Terwilliger JD, Hiekkalinna T, Ellonen P, Kaprio J, Koskenvuo M, Kontula K, Peltonen L. Genome-wide scan of predisposing loci for increased diastolic blood pressure in Finnish siblings. J Hypertens 18: 1579–1585, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Pravenec M, Churchill PC, Churchill MC, Viklicky O, Kazdova L, Aitman TJ, Petretto E, Hubner N, Wallace CA, Zimdahl H, Zidek V, Landa V, Dunbar J, Bidani A, Griffin K, Qi N, Maxova M, Kren V, Mlejnek P, Wang J, Kurtz TW. Identification of renal Cd36 as a determinant of blood pressure and risk for hypertension. Nat Genet 40: 952–954, 2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Pravenec M, Kurtz TW. Molecular genetics of experimental hypertension and the metabolic syndrome: from gene pathways to new therapies. Hypertension 49: 941–952, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rapp JP, Garrett MR, Dene H, Meng H, Hoebee B, Lathrop GM. Linkage analysis and construction of a congenic strain for a blood pressure QTL on rat chromosome 9. Genomics 51: 191–196, 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Roman RJ, Hoagland KM, Lopez B, Kwitek AE, Garrett MR, Rapp JP, Lazar J, Jacob HJ, Sarkis A. Characterization of blood pressure and renal function in chromosome 5 congenic strains of Dahl S rats. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 290: F1463–F1471, 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Rose P, Bond J, Tighe S, Toth MJ, Wellman TL, Briso de Montiano EM, Lewinter MM, Lounsbury KM. Genes overexpressed in cerebral arteries following salt-induced hypertensive disease are regulated by angiotensin II, JunB, and CREB. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 294: H1075–H1085, 2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Saad Y, Yerga-Woolwine S, Saikumar J, Farms P, Manickavasagam E, Toland EJ, Joe B. Congenic interval mapping of RNO10 reveals a complex cluster of closely-linked genetic determinants of blood pressure. Hypertension 50: 891–898, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Shao H, Sinasac DS, Burrage LC, Hodges CA, Supelak PJ, Palmert MR, Moreno C, Cowley AW, Jr, Jacob HJ, Nadeau JH. Analyzing complex traits with congenic strains. Mamm Genome 21: 276–286, 2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sheikh-Hamad D. Mammalian stanniocalcin-1 activates mitochondrial antioxidant pathways: new paradigms for regulation of macrophages and endothelium. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 298: F248–F254, 2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Silver LM. Mouse Genetics: Concepts and Applications. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995, p. xiii. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Snell GD. Methods for the study of histocompatibility genes. J Genet 49: 87–108, 1948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Sober S, Org E, Kepp K, Juhanson P, Eyheramendy S, Gieger C, Lichtner P, Klopp N, Veldre G, Viigimaa M, Doring A, Putku M, Kelgo P, Shaw-Hawkins S, Howard P, Onipinla A, Dobson RJ, Newhouse SJ, Brown M, Dominiczak A, Connell J, Samani N, Farrall M, Caulfield MJ, Munroe PB, Illig T, Wichmann HE, Meitinger T, Laan M. Targeting 160 candidate genes for blood pressure regulation with a genome-wide genotyping array. PLoS One 4: e6034, 2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Stoll M, Jacob HJ. Genetic rat models of hypertension: relationship to human hypertension. Curr Hypertens Rep 3: 157–164, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Torkamani A, Topol EJ, Schork NJ. Pathway analysis of seven common diseases assessed by genome-wide association. Genomics 92: 265–272, 2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wang Y, Huang L, Abdelrahim M, Cai Q, Truong A, Bick R, Poindexter B, Sheikh-Hamad D. Stanniocalcin-1 suppresses superoxide generation in macrophages through induction of mitochondrial UCP2. J Leukoc Biol 86: 981–988, 2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wright FA, Kong A. Linkage mapping in experimental crosses: the robustness of single-gene models. Genetics 146: 417–425, 1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zhu X, Feng T, Li Y, Lu Q, Elston RC. Detecting rare variants for complex traits using family and unrelated data. Genet Epidemiol 34: 171–187, 2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1
figS1.pdf (108.7KB, pdf)
Table S1
tableS1.pdf (127.5KB, pdf)

Articles from Physiological Genomics are provided here courtesy of American Physiological Society

RESOURCES