Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2008 Oct 22;64(Pt 11):o2149. doi: 10.1107/S1600536808033254

But-2-enal 2,4-dinitro­phenyl­hydrazone

Zhi-Gang Yin a,*, Heng-Yu Qian a, Yu-Zhen Chen a, Jie Hu a
PMCID: PMC2959657  PMID: 21581009

Abstract

In the title compound, C10H10N4O4, the but-2-enal chain is almost planar, the largest deviation from the mean plane being 0.013 (1) Å, and this plane makes a dihedral angle of 9.95 (24)° with the benzene ring,. Of the two nitro groups, one is twisted with respect to the benzene ring, making a dihedral angle of 5.7 (1)°, whereas the other is nearly in the plane of the benzene ring, with a twist angle of only 0.7 (1)°. This difference is related to the occurence of an intra­molecular N—H⋯O hydrogen bond with the O atom of the less twisted nitro group. The NH group is also involved in a weak inter­action with the same O atom of a symmetry-related mol­ecule, thus forming a pseudo inversion dimer.

Related literature

For general background, see: Okabe et al. (1993). For related structures, see: Bolte & Dill (1998); Ohba (1996). graphic file with name e-64-o2149-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • C10H10N4O4

  • M r = 250.22

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 4.6699 (8) Å

  • b = 13.188 (2) Å

  • c = 18.880 (3) Å

  • β = 92.565 (3)°

  • V = 1161.6 (3) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.11 mm−1

  • T = 293 (2) K

  • 0.27 × 0.23 × 0.23 mm

Data collection

  • Bruker SMART APEX CCD area-detector diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 1998) T min = 0.972, T max = 0.976

  • 9152 measured reflections

  • 2458 independent reflections

  • 1326 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.039

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.042

  • wR(F 2) = 0.111

  • S = 0.95

  • 2458 reflections

  • 164 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.16 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.11 e Å−3

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 1998); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 1998); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEPIII (Burnett & Johnson, 1996), ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997) and PLATON (Spek, 2003); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808033254/dn2390sup1.cif

e-64-o2149-sup1.cif (16.1KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808033254/dn2390Isup2.hkl

e-64-o2149-Isup2.hkl (120.8KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N2—H2⋯O1 0.86 2.02 2.6314 (18) 127
N2—H2⋯O1i 0.86 2.52 3.331 (2) 159

Symmetry code: (i) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their deep appreciation to the Outstanding Youth Fund for Henan Natural Scientific Research (grant No. 0512001100) and the Fund for Scientific and Technical Emphasis (grant No. 072102270006)

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

2,4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine has applications in organic synthesis and some of its derivatives have been shown to be potentially DNA-damaging and mutagenic agents (Okabe et al., 1993). Some phenylhydrazone derivatives have been synthesized in our laboratory. As part of our work, we report the synthesis and crystal structure of the title compound(I).

In the title compound, the but-2-enal chain is planar with the largest deviation from the mean plane being 0.013 (1)Å at C1. This plane makes a dihedral angle of 9.95 (24)° with the benzene ring, so the whole molecule is roughly planar (Fig. 1). Of the the two nitro groups, one is twisted with respect to the benzene ring making a dihedral angle of 5.7 (1)° whereas the other is nearly in the plane of the benzene ring with a twist angle of only 0.7 (1)°. This difference is related to the occurence of an intramolecular hydrogen N-H···bond with the O atom of the less twisted nitro group (Table 1). The NH is also in weak intermolecular interaction with the same O atom of a symmetry related molecule building a pseudo dimer (Table 1, Fig. 2).

Bond lengths and bond angles are consistent with those of other dinitrophenylhydrazone derivatives(Ohba,1996; Bolte & Dill, 1998)

Experimental

2,4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine (1 mmol, 0.198 g) was dissolved in anhydrous methanol, H2SO4 (98% 0.5 ml) was added to this, the mixture was stirred for several minitutes at 351 K, but-2-enal (1 mmol 0.070 g) in methanol (8 ml) was added dropwise and the mixture was stirred at refluxing temperature for 2 h. The product was isolated and recrystallized in methanol, red single crystals of (I) was obtained after two weeks.

Refinement

H atoms were placed in calculated position and treated as riding with C—H= 0.93Å (aromatic), 0.96Å(methyl) and N-H= 0.86\%A with Uiso(H)=1.2Ueq(C,N) or Uiso(H)=1.5Ueq(methyl).

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Molecular view of (I) with the atom-labeling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level. H atoms are presented as small spheres of arbitrary radii. Intramolecular H bond is shown as dashed line.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Partial packing view showing the formation of pseudo dimer through weak intermolecular N-H···O hydrogen bonds which are shown as dashed lines. H atoms not involved in hydrogen bondings have been omitted for clarity.[Symmetry code: (i) -x+1, -y+1, -z]

Crystal data

C10H10N4O4 F(000) = 520
Mr = 250.22 Dx = 1.432 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/c Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc Cell parameters from 1673 reflections
a = 4.6699 (8) Å θ = 2.1–25.5°
b = 13.188 (2) Å µ = 0.11 mm1
c = 18.880 (3) Å T = 293 K
β = 92.565 (3)° Block, red
V = 1161.6 (3) Å3 0.27 × 0.23 × 0.23 mm
Z = 4

Data collection

Bruker SMART APEX CCD area-detector diffractometer 2458 independent reflections
Radiation source: sealed tube 1326 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphite Rint = 0.039
φ and ω scans θmax = 27.0°, θmin = 2.7°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 1998) h = −5→5
Tmin = 0.972, Tmax = 0.976 k = −16→16
9152 measured reflections l = −24→24

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.042 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.111 H-atom parameters constrained
S = 0.95 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0552P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2458 reflections (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
164 parameters Δρmax = 0.16 e Å3
0 restraints Δρmin = −0.11 e Å3

Special details

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
N1 0.0380 (3) 0.35052 (10) 0.11439 (8) 0.0607 (4)
N2 0.1292 (3) 0.44685 (9) 0.09740 (8) 0.0563 (4)
H2 0.2613 0.4552 0.0676 0.068*
N3 0.2785 (3) 0.65667 (11) 0.05938 (8) 0.0554 (4)
N4 −0.3915 (4) 0.77803 (13) 0.22849 (9) 0.0673 (5)
O1 0.4042 (3) 0.58766 (9) 0.02881 (7) 0.0693 (4)
O2 0.3266 (3) 0.74610 (9) 0.04720 (8) 0.0761 (4)
O3 −0.5851 (3) 0.75891 (12) 0.26884 (9) 0.0872 (5)
O4 −0.3125 (3) 0.86398 (12) 0.21507 (9) 0.0909 (5)
C1 0.1822 (6) −0.01443 (14) 0.09371 (14) 0.1054 (9)
H1A 0.0157 −0.0191 0.1216 0.158*
H1B 0.3428 −0.0449 0.1191 0.158*
H1C 0.1469 −0.0492 0.0495 0.158*
C2 0.2468 (5) 0.09525 (15) 0.07954 (12) 0.0770 (6)
H22 0.4003 0.1089 0.0513 0.092*
C3 0.1060 (5) 0.17380 (13) 0.10341 (10) 0.0651 (5)
H3 −0.0512 0.1615 0.1307 0.078*
C4 0.1811 (4) 0.27691 (12) 0.08969 (10) 0.0585 (5)
H4 0.3370 0.2906 0.0623 0.070*
C5 0.0079 (4) 0.52752 (12) 0.12821 (9) 0.0497 (4)
C6 0.0733 (4) 0.63020 (12) 0.11150 (9) 0.0506 (4)
C7 −0.0580 (4) 0.71065 (13) 0.14479 (10) 0.0539 (5)
H7 −0.0131 0.7771 0.1330 0.065*
C8 −0.2534 (4) 0.69186 (13) 0.19495 (10) 0.0556 (5)
C9 −0.3232 (4) 0.59241 (15) 0.21334 (10) 0.0603 (5)
H9 −0.4562 0.5806 0.2476 0.072*
C10 −0.1960 (4) 0.51299 (13) 0.18104 (10) 0.0582 (5)
H10 −0.2439 0.4473 0.1939 0.070*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
N1 0.0727 (10) 0.0384 (8) 0.0716 (10) −0.0054 (7) 0.0084 (8) 0.0014 (7)
N2 0.0651 (9) 0.0405 (8) 0.0639 (9) −0.0042 (7) 0.0116 (7) 0.0008 (7)
N3 0.0681 (10) 0.0380 (8) 0.0602 (9) 0.0009 (7) 0.0032 (8) 0.0008 (7)
N4 0.0677 (11) 0.0668 (12) 0.0670 (11) 0.0122 (9) −0.0015 (9) −0.0095 (9)
O1 0.0902 (10) 0.0448 (7) 0.0747 (9) 0.0027 (7) 0.0259 (7) −0.0002 (6)
O2 0.1022 (11) 0.0386 (7) 0.0894 (10) −0.0035 (7) 0.0259 (8) 0.0066 (6)
O3 0.0782 (10) 0.0913 (11) 0.0937 (11) 0.0151 (8) 0.0195 (9) −0.0164 (8)
O4 0.1150 (13) 0.0545 (9) 0.1047 (12) 0.0163 (9) 0.0220 (10) −0.0058 (8)
C1 0.162 (2) 0.0418 (11) 0.110 (2) 0.0019 (14) −0.0186 (17) 0.0004 (12)
C2 0.1028 (17) 0.0469 (11) 0.0809 (14) 0.0004 (11) 0.0013 (12) −0.0004 (10)
C3 0.0838 (14) 0.0428 (10) 0.0687 (12) −0.0059 (9) 0.0057 (10) 0.0026 (9)
C4 0.0724 (12) 0.0427 (10) 0.0606 (11) −0.0040 (9) 0.0060 (9) 0.0011 (8)
C5 0.0527 (10) 0.0394 (9) 0.0564 (11) −0.0010 (8) −0.0037 (8) −0.0010 (7)
C6 0.0528 (10) 0.0445 (9) 0.0543 (10) −0.0006 (8) −0.0001 (9) 0.0012 (8)
C7 0.0572 (11) 0.0406 (9) 0.0632 (11) 0.0014 (8) −0.0062 (9) −0.0002 (8)
C8 0.0548 (11) 0.0519 (11) 0.0596 (11) 0.0098 (9) −0.0014 (9) −0.0042 (9)
C9 0.0545 (11) 0.0661 (12) 0.0605 (12) 0.0025 (9) 0.0051 (9) −0.0002 (9)
C10 0.0622 (11) 0.0474 (10) 0.0649 (12) −0.0042 (9) 0.0039 (9) 0.0056 (9)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

N1—C4 1.278 (2) C2—C3 1.317 (3)
N1—N2 1.3821 (17) C2—H22 0.9300
N2—C5 1.349 (2) C3—C4 1.431 (2)
N2—H2 0.8600 C3—H3 0.9300
N3—O2 1.2245 (17) C4—H4 0.9300
N3—O1 1.2396 (17) C5—C10 1.422 (3)
N3—C6 1.446 (2) C5—C6 1.427 (2)
N4—O4 1.2221 (19) C6—C7 1.390 (2)
N4—O3 1.234 (2) C7—C8 1.367 (3)
N4—C8 1.465 (2) C7—H7 0.9300
C1—C2 1.504 (3) C8—C9 1.399 (3)
C1—H1A 0.9600 C9—C10 1.362 (2)
C1—H1B 0.9600 C9—H9 0.9300
C1—H1C 0.9600 C10—H10 0.9300
C4—N1—N2 116.23 (15) N1—C4—C3 121.30 (18)
C5—N2—N1 119.02 (14) N1—C4—H4 119.4
C5—N2—H2 120.5 C3—C4—H4 119.4
N1—N2—H2 120.5 N2—C5—C10 120.21 (15)
O2—N3—O1 121.65 (15) N2—C5—C6 123.70 (16)
O2—N3—C6 119.54 (15) C10—C5—C6 116.08 (16)
O1—N3—C6 118.80 (14) C7—C6—C5 121.43 (16)
O4—N4—O3 123.62 (17) C7—C6—N3 116.26 (15)
O4—N4—C8 119.16 (19) C5—C6—N3 122.30 (15)
O3—N4—C8 117.21 (17) C8—C7—C6 119.78 (16)
C2—C1—H1A 109.5 C8—C7—H7 120.1
C2—C1—H1B 109.5 C6—C7—H7 120.1
H1A—C1—H1B 109.5 C7—C8—C9 120.80 (17)
C2—C1—H1C 109.5 C7—C8—N4 118.64 (17)
H1A—C1—H1C 109.5 C9—C8—N4 120.55 (18)
H1B—C1—H1C 109.5 C10—C9—C8 119.93 (18)
C3—C2—C1 126.1 (2) C10—C9—H9 120.0
C3—C2—H22 117.0 C8—C9—H9 120.0
C1—C2—H22 117.0 C9—C10—C5 121.97 (16)
C2—C3—C4 123.7 (2) C9—C10—H10 119.0
C2—C3—H3 118.1 C5—C10—H10 119.0
C4—C3—H3 118.1
C5—N2—N1—C4 −172.68 (16) N1—C4—C3—C2 −179.7 (2)
N2—N1—C4—C3 −179.67 (15) C4—C3—C2—C1 178.41 (19)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
N2—H2···O1 0.86 2.02 2.6314 (18) 127
N2—H2···O1i 0.86 2.52 3.331 (2) 159

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: DN2390).

References

  1. Bolte, M. & Dill, M. (1998). Acta Cryst. C54, IUC9800065.
  2. Bruker (1998). SMART, SAINT and SADABS Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  3. Burnett, M. N. & Johnson, C. K. (1996). ORTEPIII Report ORNL-6895. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee, USA.
  4. Farrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst.30, 565.
  5. Ohba, S. (1996). Acta Cryst. C52, 2118–2119.
  6. Okabe, N., Nakamura, T. & Fukuda, H. (1993). Acta Cryst. C49, 1678–1680.
  7. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  8. Spek, A. L. (2003). J. Appl. Cryst.36, 7–13.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808033254/dn2390sup1.cif

e-64-o2149-sup1.cif (16.1KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808033254/dn2390Isup2.hkl

e-64-o2149-Isup2.hkl (120.8KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES