Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2008 Nov 8;64(Pt 12):m1510. doi: 10.1107/S1600536808035873

Poly[bis­(μ-2,6-dimethyl­pyridinium-3,5-dicarboxyl­ato-κ 2 O 3:O 5)copper(II)]

Hong-Kun Zhang a,*, Yu-Hong Du a, Tao Jiang a, Bai-Yan Li b, Guang-Feng Hou b
PMCID: PMC2959900  PMID: 21581129

Abstract

In the title coordination polymer, [Cu(C9H8NO4)2]n, the Cu atom, located on a twofold rotation axis, is four coordinate in a distorted square-planar environment. Each 2,6-dimethyl­pyridinium-3,5-dicarboxyl­ate anion bridges two Cu atoms, forming a two-dimensional coordination polymer. A three-dimensional supra­molecular network is built from N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds involving the pyridinium NH and the carboxyl COO groups.

Related literature

For the synthesis of 2,6-dimethyl­pyridine-3,5-dicarboxylic acid, see: Checchi et al. (1959). For the crystal structures of some of its metal complexes, see: Gao et al. (2007); Shi et al. (2007); Zeng et al. (2000, 2002).graphic file with name e-64-m1510-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • [Cu(C9H8N2O4)2]

  • M r = 451.87

  • Orthorhombic, Inline graphic

  • a = 8.2003 (16) Å

  • b = 16.234 (3) Å

  • c = 13.708 (3) Å

  • V = 1824.9 (6) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 1.25 mm−1

  • T = 291 (2) K

  • 0.26 × 0.24 × 0.19 mm

Data collection

  • Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995) T min = 0.733, T max = 0.801

  • 16747 measured reflections

  • 2097 independent reflections

  • 1754 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.051

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.033

  • wR(F 2) = 0.092

  • S = 1.09

  • 2097 reflections

  • 138 parameters

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 0.41 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.29 e Å−3

Data collection: RAPID-AUTO (Rigaku, 1998); cell refinement: RAPID-AUTO; data reduction: CrystalStructure (Rigaku/MSC, 2002); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808035873/ng2511sup1.cif

e-64-m1510-sup1.cif (15.1KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808035873/ng2511Isup2.hkl

e-64-m1510-Isup2.hkl (103.2KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H8⋯O3i 0.82 (3) 1.88 (3) 2.698 (2) 177 (3)

Symmetry code: (i) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Project of the Science and Technology Foundation of Heilongjiang Provincial Education Department (grant No. 11523041) and Heilongjiang East College for supporting this study.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

To the best of our knowledge, there have been few reports to date on the crystal structure of 2,6-dimethylpyrine-3,5-dicarboxylic acid ligand (Zeng et al., 2000; Zeng et al., 2002: Gao et al., 2007). The crystal structure of 2,6-dimethylpyridinium-3,5-dicarboxylate ligand and Cu atom complex have been reported, namely trans-tetraaquabis (2,6-dimethylpyrinium-3,5-dicarboxylate)cooper(II) tetrahydrate, which is a discrete compound (Shi et al., 2007). In this paper, we report the new two-dimensional title complex, (I), synthesized by the recation of 2,6-dimethylpyrine-3,5-dicarboxylic acid and copper(II) dinitrate in methanol solution.

In the title compound, (Fig. 1), the Cu atom is located on a twofold rotation axis is four coordinated in a square environment that is formed by four carboxylate O atoms from four 2,6-dimethylpyridinium-3,5- dicarboxylate ligands. Each 2,6-dimethylpyridinium-3,5-dicarboxylate ligand bridges two Cu atom to form a two-dimensional supramolecular network parallel the ab plane (Fig. 2). In addition, N1—H8···O3i hydrogen bonds link these adjacent plane into a three-dimensional supramolecular network (Table 1).

Experimental

2,6-Dimethylpyridine-3,5-dicarboxylic acid was prepared by basic hydrolysis of diethyl 2,6-dimethylpyridine-3,5-dicarboxylate, prepared according to Checchi (1959). Diethyl 2,6-dimethylpyridine-3,5-dicarboxylate (25.1 g, 0.1 mol) and potassium hydroxide (13.44 g, 0.24 mol) were dissolved in 150 ml e thanol and 150 ml water mixed solution, then stirred for three hours under reflux conditions. 10.5 g 2,6-Dimethylpyridine-3,5-dicarboxylic acid, a white precipitate, formed by adjusting pH of solution to 3 with 0.1 M HCl after evaporation of ethanol.

The complex (I) was synthesized with coppert(II) dinitrate (0.368 g, 2 mmol) and 2,6-dimethylpyridine-3,5-dicarboxylic acid (0.390 g, 2 mmol) were dissolved in methanol and the pH was adjusted to 6 with 0.01M sodium hydroxide. Black crystals were separated from the filtered solution after several days.

Refinement

H atoms bound to C atoms were placed in calculated positions and treated as riding on their parent atoms, with C—H = 0.93 Å, 0.97 Å for aromatic and methyl H atoms respectively; Uiso(H) was set to = 1.2Ueq of the carrier atom (1.5 Ueq for methyl H atoms). The H8 atoms bond to N1 atoms were located in a difference Fourier map and refined isotropically.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The molecular structure of (I), showing displacement ellipsoids at the 30% probability level for non-H atoms. [symmetry codes: (I): -x - 1, -y + 1, -z; (II): x - 1, 3/2 - y, -1/2 + z; (III): x, -1/2 - y, -1/2 + z]

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Part of the polymeric structure of (I), showing a two-dimensional network.

Crystal data

[Cu(C9H8N2O4)2] F000 = 924
Mr = 451.87 Dx = 1.645 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, Pbcn Mo Kα radiation λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2n 2ab Cell parameters from 12587 reflections
a = 8.2003 (16) Å θ = 3.2–27.5º
b = 16.234 (3) Å µ = 1.25 mm1
c = 13.708 (3) Å T = 291 (2) K
V = 1824.9 (6) Å3 Bluck, black
Z = 4 0.26 × 0.24 × 0.19 mm

Data collection

Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID diffractometer 2097 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 1754 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Monochromator: graphite Rint = 0.051
T = 291(2) K θmax = 27.5º
ω scan θmin = 3.2º
Absorption correction: Multi-scan(ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995) h = −10→10
Tmin = 0.733, Tmax = 0.801 k = −21→21
16747 measured reflections l = −17→17

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.033 H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.092   w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0491P)2 + 0.9342P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.09 (Δ/σ)max = 0.008
2097 reflections Δρmax = 0.41 e Å3
138 parameters Δρmin = −0.29 e Å3
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods Extinction correction: none

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
C1 0.1149 (2) 0.35544 (11) 0.53558 (13) 0.0216 (4)
C2 0.1113 (2) 0.33765 (12) 0.43628 (14) 0.0226 (4)
C3 0.1706 (3) 0.39606 (12) 0.37198 (13) 0.0251 (4)
H1 0.1677 0.3849 0.3055 0.030*
C4 0.2345 (3) 0.47081 (12) 0.40328 (13) 0.0225 (4)
C5 0.2407 (3) 0.48643 (11) 0.50282 (13) 0.0211 (4)
C6 0.0406 (3) 0.25909 (13) 0.39516 (15) 0.0269 (4)
C7 0.2938 (3) 0.53108 (12) 0.32739 (14) 0.0257 (4)
C8 0.3043 (3) 0.56351 (13) 0.54895 (15) 0.0300 (5)
H5 0.2941 0.5595 0.6186 0.045*
H6 0.2427 0.6099 0.5259 0.045*
H7 0.4170 0.5706 0.5320 0.045*
C9 0.0530 (3) 0.30107 (14) 0.61494 (15) 0.0331 (5)
H2 0.1078 0.3142 0.6749 0.050*
H3 0.0736 0.2446 0.5984 0.050*
H4 −0.0621 0.3094 0.6227 0.050*
Cu1 0.0000 0.148168 (18) 0.2500 0.02018 (13)
H8 0.186 (3) 0.4388 (17) 0.621 (2) 0.042 (8)*
N1 0.1800 (2) 0.42800 (10) 0.56291 (12) 0.0225 (4)
O1 −0.0813 (2) 0.22887 (11) 0.43090 (13) 0.0466 (5)
O2 0.1169 (2) 0.23282 (9) 0.32017 (10) 0.0333 (4)
O3 0.2050 (3) 0.54134 (12) 0.25578 (11) 0.0442 (5)
O4 0.4295 (2) 0.56494 (9) 0.34300 (11) 0.0337 (4)

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
C1 0.0243 (10) 0.0224 (9) 0.0180 (9) 0.0001 (8) −0.0003 (7) 0.0006 (7)
C2 0.0248 (10) 0.0226 (9) 0.0203 (9) −0.0015 (8) −0.0012 (7) −0.0027 (7)
C3 0.0331 (11) 0.0271 (10) 0.0152 (8) −0.0015 (8) −0.0020 (7) −0.0029 (7)
C4 0.0283 (10) 0.0217 (9) 0.0175 (8) −0.0017 (8) −0.0009 (7) 0.0015 (7)
C5 0.0239 (10) 0.0207 (9) 0.0186 (9) 0.0000 (8) −0.0020 (7) 0.0002 (7)
C6 0.0319 (11) 0.0239 (10) 0.0250 (10) −0.0044 (8) −0.0064 (8) −0.0013 (8)
C7 0.0382 (12) 0.0203 (9) 0.0186 (9) 0.0020 (9) 0.0036 (8) 0.0015 (7)
C8 0.0399 (12) 0.0254 (10) 0.0246 (10) −0.0060 (9) −0.0031 (8) −0.0051 (8)
C9 0.0442 (13) 0.0325 (11) 0.0225 (10) −0.0085 (10) 0.0067 (9) 0.0033 (8)
Cu1 0.0283 (2) 0.01488 (19) 0.01735 (19) 0.000 −0.00329 (12) 0.000
N1 0.0294 (9) 0.0249 (8) 0.0132 (7) −0.0018 (7) −0.0006 (6) −0.0012 (6)
O1 0.0439 (11) 0.0449 (10) 0.0511 (10) −0.0222 (9) 0.0102 (9) −0.0123 (8)
O2 0.0440 (9) 0.0283 (7) 0.0277 (7) −0.0087 (7) −0.0004 (7) −0.0095 (6)
O3 0.0507 (11) 0.0592 (12) 0.0228 (8) −0.0022 (9) −0.0051 (7) 0.0161 (7)
O4 0.0442 (10) 0.0279 (8) 0.0290 (8) −0.0094 (7) 0.0034 (7) 0.0081 (6)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

C1—N1 1.346 (3) C7—O4 1.259 (3)
C1—C2 1.392 (3) C8—H5 0.9600
C1—C9 1.490 (3) C8—H6 0.9600
C2—C3 1.383 (3) C8—H7 0.9600
C2—C6 1.510 (3) C9—H2 0.9600
C3—C4 1.390 (3) C9—H3 0.9600
C3—H1 0.9300 C9—H4 0.9600
C4—C5 1.389 (3) Cu1—O2 1.9322 (15)
C4—C7 1.509 (3) Cu1—O2i 1.9322 (15)
C5—N1 1.351 (2) Cu1—O4ii 1.9455 (15)
C5—C8 1.496 (3) Cu1—O4iii 1.9455 (15)
C6—O1 1.216 (3) N1—H8 0.82 (3)
C6—O2 1.277 (3) O4—Cu1iv 1.9455 (15)
C7—O3 1.234 (3)
N1—C1—C2 117.53 (17) C5—C8—H6 109.5
N1—C1—C9 116.75 (17) H5—C8—H6 109.5
C2—C1—C9 125.72 (18) C5—C8—H7 109.5
C3—C2—C1 118.26 (17) H5—C8—H7 109.5
C3—C2—C6 118.44 (17) H6—C8—H7 109.5
C1—C2—C6 123.26 (17) C1—C9—H2 109.5
C2—C3—C4 122.31 (17) C1—C9—H3 109.5
C2—C3—H1 118.8 H2—C9—H3 109.5
C4—C3—H1 118.8 C1—C9—H4 109.5
C5—C4—C3 118.47 (17) H2—C9—H4 109.5
C5—C4—C7 123.17 (17) H3—C9—H4 109.5
C3—C4—C7 118.36 (17) O2—Cu1—O2i 89.32 (10)
N1—C5—C4 117.21 (17) O2—Cu1—O4ii 165.38 (7)
N1—C5—C8 117.25 (16) O2i—Cu1—O4ii 91.17 (7)
C4—C5—C8 125.51 (17) O2—Cu1—O4iii 91.17 (7)
O1—C6—O2 126.3 (2) O2i—Cu1—O4iii 165.38 (7)
O1—C6—C2 120.40 (19) O4ii—Cu1—O4iii 92.03 (10)
O2—C6—C2 113.20 (18) C1—N1—C5 126.19 (16)
O3—C7—O4 126.7 (2) C1—N1—H8 119 (2)
O3—C7—C4 116.5 (2) C5—N1—H8 115 (2)
O4—C7—C4 116.80 (18) C6—O2—Cu1 113.26 (14)
C5—C8—H5 109.5 C7—O4—Cu1iv 117.02 (14)

Symmetry codes: (i) −x, y, −z+1/2; (ii) x−1/2, y−1/2, −z+1/2; (iii) −x+1/2, y−1/2, z; (iv) x+1/2, y+1/2, −z+1/2.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
N1—H8···O3v 0.82 (3) 1.88 (3) 2.698 (2) 177 (3)

Symmetry codes: (v) x, −y+1, z+1/2.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: NG2511).

References

  1. Checchi, S. (1959). Gazz. Chim. Ital 89, 2151–2162.
  2. Gao, J.-S., Zhang, Y.-M., Li, B.-Y. & Hou, G.-F. (2007). Acta Cryst. E63, m2717.
  3. Higashi, T. (1995). ABSCOR Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
  4. Rigaku (1998). RAPID-AUTO Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
  5. Rigaku/MSC (2002). CrystalStructure Rigaku/MSC Inc., The Woodlands, Texas, USA.
  6. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. Shi, A.-E., Li, B.-Y., Hou, G.-F. & Gao, J.-S. (2007). Acta Cryst. E63, m471–m473.
  8. Zeng, Q.-Q., Jennings, M. C., Puddephatt, R. J. & Muir, K. W. (2000). CrystEngComm, 2, 73–76.
  9. Zeng, Q.-Q., Jennings, M. C., Puddephatt, R. J. & Muir, K. W. (2002). Inorg. Chem 41, 5174–5186. [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808035873/ng2511sup1.cif

e-64-m1510-sup1.cif (15.1KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808035873/ng2511Isup2.hkl

e-64-m1510-Isup2.hkl (103.2KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES