Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2008 Jan 30;64(Pt 2):m430–m431. doi: 10.1107/S1600536808002584

Bis(acetato-κO)[N,N,N′,N′-tetra­methyl­ethane-1,2-diamine-κ2 N,N′]copper(II)

J Chris Slootweg a,, Peter Chen a,*
PMCID: PMC2960195  PMID: 21201373

Abstract

In the title compound, [Cu(C2H3O2)2(C6H16N2)], the CuII atom is coordinated by two N atoms from the chelating N,N,N′,N′-tetra­methyl­ethane-1,2-diamine ligand and two O atoms from two acetate anions in a distorted square-planar geometry. In addition, there are longer contacts between Cu and the second O atom of each acetate ligand, which could be considered to complete a distorted octa­hedral geometry. The mol­ecules in the crystal structure are connected via inter­molecular C—H⋯O hydrogen-bonding contacts.

Related literature

For general background, see: Slootweg & Chen (2006); Gerdes & Chen (2004); Gerdes (2004). For related structures, see: Dalai et al. (2002); Margraf et al. (2005); Devereux et al. (2007); Brown et al. (2002).graphic file with name e-64-0m430-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • [Cu(C2H3O2)2(C6H16N2)]

  • M r = 297.84

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 8.0201 (5) Å

  • b = 15.9153 (10) Å

  • c = 10.8536 (7) Å

  • β = 90.910 (3)°

  • V = 1385.20 (15) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 1.58 mm−1

  • T = 220 (2) K

  • 0.21 × 0.19 × 0.15 mm

Data collection

  • Nonius KappaCCD area-detector diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: none

  • 4704 measured reflections

  • 2711 independent reflections

  • 2321 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.040

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.040

  • wR(F 2) = 0.106

  • S = 1.05

  • 2711 reflections

  • 183 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.53 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.45 e Å−3

Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 2000); cell refinement: SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997); data reduction: DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997) and SCALEPACK; program(s) used to solve structure: SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2003); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808002584/si2074sup1.cif

e-64-0m430-sup1.cif (18.6KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808002584/si2074Isup2.hkl

e-64-0m430-Isup2.hkl (133.1KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Selected geometric parameters (Å, °).

Cu1—O14 1.9797 (19)
Cu1—O10 1.9813 (19)
Cu1⋯O12 2.509 (2)
Cu1⋯O16 2.531 (2)
Cu1—N2 2.037 (2)
Cu1—N5 2.047 (2)
O14—Cu1—O10 92.08 (9)
O14—Cu1—N2 164.30 (9)
O10—Cu1—N2 93.12 (9)
O14—Cu1—N5 92.40 (9)
O10—Cu1—N5 165.18 (9)
N2—Cu1—N5 86.30 (9)

Table 2. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C3—H3A⋯O12i 0.98 2.34 3.281 (4) 160
C4—H4A⋯O16ii 0.98 2.50 3.475 (4) 176
C13—H13C⋯O16iii 0.97 2.54 3.507 (4) 173
C17—H17C⋯O12iv 0.97 2.58 3.542 (4) 170

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic; (iii) Inline graphic; (iv) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

A TALENT stipend (JCS) of the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) is gratefully acknowledged. We thank Mr P. Seiler for the single-crystal structure determination.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

The aspiration of our work is to gain insight into the underlying mechanisms of the catalytic transformations of hydrocarbons by C—H bond activation (Slootweg & Chen, 2006; Gerdes & Chen, 2004) and subsequent oxidative coupling using heterobimetallic catalysis (Gerdes, 2004). Well defined platinum or palladium catalysts are suited for the C—H activation, whearas a copper-catalyzed coupling cycle is ideal for the C—X bond forming step. The intersection of the two cycles, that is transmetallation of the hydrocarbon group from platinum/palladium to copper, is poorly understood while being decisive for the outcome of the reaction. To connect two different catalyticallly active metal fragments, bridging acetate ligands are ideally suited (Gerdes, 2004) and therefore deserve our current attention. The title complex, [(TMEDA)Cu(OAc)2] (TMEDA = tetramethylethane-1,2-diamine), is a promising building block for the generation of the mixed [(TMEDA)Cu(κ1-acetate)(µ-acetate)MLn] complexes.

In the mononuclear title complex, the copper(II) atom is in a distorted, square-planar coordination geometry (Fig. 1, Table 1) and bonded to the bidentate tetramethylethane-1,2-diamine ligand [Cu—N 2.037 (2), 2.047 (2) Å] and to the two acetate anions (Dalai et al., 2002; Margraf et al., 2005). The acetato groups in [(TMEDA)Cu(OAc)2] are mono-coordinating [Cu—O 1.979 (2), 1.9810 (19) Å] (Devereux et al., 2007), but the second oxygen atom of each ligand shows an additional weak interaction with the copper atom [Cu—O 2.509 (2), 2.531 (2) Å], and could be considered to complete a distorted octahedral geometry (Dalai et al., 2002). A similar situation is observed for the zinc analogue, [(TMEDA)Zn(OAc)2], which displays more pronounced κ2-coordination of the acetates [Zn—O 2.052 (2), 2.353 (4) Å] (Brown et al., 2002).

The molecules in the crystal are connected via hydrogen bonding. There are four short intermolecular C—H···O contacts with O···H distances between 2.34 and 2.58 Å and C—H···O angles between 160 and 176° (Table 2).

Experimental

General Procedures. ESI-MS measurements were performed on a Finnigan MAT TSQ Quantum triple-quad mass spectrometer equipped with electrospray sources. Elemental analyses were performed by the Microanalytical Laboratory of the Laboratorium für Organische Chemie, ETH Zürich.

The title compound was obtained as follows. To a suspension of copper(II)acetate (1.78 g, 9.78 mmol) in MeOH (40 ml) an equimolar amount of TMEDA (1.48 ml, 9.78 mmol) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred for 18 h at room temperature yielding a deep blue solution. After filtration, the solvent was removed in vacuo yielding analytically pure [(TMEDA)Cu(OAc)2] (2.64 g, 91%) as a blue powder. Crystallization from THF at room temperature yielded blue plates suitable for X-ray crystallography. M.p. 178 °C (decomp.). MS (ESI, positive ions, DCM) m/z (%): 238 (100) [M - O2CCH3]+. Elem. anal.: Found C, 40.18; H, 7.15; N, 9.41. Calcd. for C10H22N2O4Cu: C, 40.33; H, 7.44; N, 9.41.

Refinement

The structure was refined by full-matrix least-squares analysis using an isotropic extinction correction. All non H-atoms were refined anisotropically, H-atoms isotropically, whereby H-positions are based on stereochemical considerations. For CH3 groups, C—H distances are 0.97 Å and Uiso(H) = 1.5U(eq) on the respective C-atom, while for CH2 groups, the corresponding values are 0.98 Å and 1.2U(eq), respectively.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Displacement ellipsoid of [(TMEDA)Cu(OAc)2] with ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level. Weak interactions in the metal coordination sphere are shown as dotted lines. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity.

Crystal data

[Cu(C2H3O2)2(C6H16N2)] F000 = 628
Mr = 297.84 Dx = 1.428 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/n Melting point: 178 K
Hall symbol: -P 2yn Mo Kα radiation λ = 0.7107 Å
a = 8.0201 (5) Å Cell parameters from 10930 reflections
b = 15.9153 (10) Å θ = 3.2–26.0º
c = 10.8536 (7) Å µ = 1.58 mm1
β = 90.910 (3)º T = 220 (2) K
V = 1385.20 (15) Å3 Cut fragment, blue
Z = 4 0.21 × 0.19 × 0.15 mm

Data collection

Nonius KappaCCD area-detector diffractometer 2321 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube Rint = 0.040
Monochromator: graphite θmax = 26.0º
T = 220(2) K θmin = 3.2º
φ and ω scans with κ offsets h = −9→9
Absorption correction: none k = −16→19
4704 measured reflections l = −13→13
2711 independent reflections

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
Least-squares matrix: full H-atom parameters constrained
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.040   w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0446P)2 + 0.7399P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.106 (Δ/σ)max = 0.006
S = 1.06 Δρmax = 0.53 e Å3
2711 reflections Δρmin = −0.45 e Å3
183 parameters Extinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods Extinction coefficient: 0.0108 (18)
Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Cu1 0.53786 (4) 0.26068 (2) 0.13564 (3) 0.03199 (13)
N2 0.3491 (3) 0.18731 (15) 0.1983 (2) 0.0345 (5)
C3 0.1951 (4) 0.23935 (18) 0.1898 (3) 0.0382 (7)
H3A 0.1903 0.2777 0.2603 0.058 (11)*
H3B 0.0964 0.2031 0.1909 0.051 (9)*
C4 0.1978 (4) 0.28884 (19) 0.0717 (3) 0.0389 (7)
H4A 0.1912 0.2506 0.0010 0.038 (9)*
H4B 0.1016 0.3268 0.0675 0.055 (11)*
N5 0.3551 (3) 0.33834 (15) 0.0673 (2) 0.0374 (5)
C6 0.3407 (4) 0.4158 (2) 0.1401 (4) 0.0529 (9)
H6A 0.2490 0.4494 0.1078 0.079 (12)*
H6B 0.4436 0.4476 0.1351 0.044 (9)*
H6C 0.3201 0.4016 0.2254 0.066 (12)*
C7 0.3938 (4) 0.3596 (3) −0.0616 (3) 0.0562 (9)
H7A 0.3075 0.3960 −0.0952 0.079 (14)*
H7B 0.3988 0.3085 −0.1101 0.073 (12)*
H7C 0.5005 0.3881 −0.0642 0.059 (11)*
C8 0.3279 (4) 0.10915 (18) 0.1261 (3) 0.0414 (7)
H8A 0.2369 0.0766 0.1595 0.062 (10)*
H8B 0.4299 0.0765 0.1308 0.048 (9)*
H8C 0.3029 0.1231 0.0408 0.070 (13)*
C9 0.3865 (4) 0.1654 (2) 0.3283 (3) 0.0448 (7)
H9A 0.3981 0.2164 0.3765 0.053 (10)*
H9B 0.4896 0.1336 0.3330 0.058 (10)*
H9C 0.2963 0.1317 0.3605 0.081 (13)*
O10 0.7070 (2) 0.17122 (13) 0.15991 (18) 0.0385 (5)
C11 0.7292 (3) 0.14698 (17) 0.0489 (3) 0.0349 (6)
O12 0.6444 (3) 0.17379 (14) −0.03924 (19) 0.0465 (5)
C13 0.8650 (4) 0.0828 (2) 0.0276 (3) 0.0492 (8)
H13A 0.8172 0.0335 −0.0118 0.083 (13)*
H13B 0.9156 0.0669 0.1060 0.104 (18)*
H13C 0.9493 0.1068 −0.0250 0.096 (15)*
O14 0.7116 (2) 0.34802 (13) 0.11797 (18) 0.0405 (5)
C15 0.7388 (4) 0.36997 (18) 0.2298 (3) 0.0369 (6)
O16 0.6567 (3) 0.34218 (14) 0.31695 (19) 0.0449 (5)
C17 0.8749 (4) 0.4340 (2) 0.2530 (4) 0.0503 (8)
H17A 0.8266 0.4850 0.2858 0.078 (12)*
H17B 0.9300 0.4466 0.1762 0.084 (16)*
H17C 0.9557 0.4115 0.3117 0.091 (13)*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Cu1 0.0299 (2) 0.0361 (2) 0.0299 (2) 0.00122 (13) −0.00067 (14) −0.00086 (13)
N2 0.0332 (12) 0.0405 (12) 0.0295 (12) 0.0007 (10) −0.0031 (9) −0.0032 (10)
C3 0.0315 (14) 0.0484 (16) 0.0346 (15) 0.0014 (12) 0.0018 (12) −0.0055 (12)
C4 0.0351 (15) 0.0467 (16) 0.0348 (15) 0.0062 (13) −0.0063 (12) −0.0057 (13)
N5 0.0379 (13) 0.0390 (12) 0.0352 (13) 0.0029 (10) −0.0005 (10) 0.0015 (10)
C6 0.0446 (18) 0.0394 (16) 0.074 (3) 0.0082 (14) −0.0051 (17) −0.0102 (16)
C7 0.054 (2) 0.071 (2) 0.0435 (19) 0.0032 (18) −0.0009 (16) 0.0163 (18)
C8 0.0379 (15) 0.0382 (15) 0.0481 (19) −0.0035 (12) −0.0016 (13) −0.0061 (13)
C9 0.0479 (18) 0.0558 (18) 0.0306 (15) 0.0010 (15) −0.0045 (13) 0.0079 (14)
O10 0.0361 (11) 0.0447 (11) 0.0347 (11) 0.0060 (9) −0.0011 (8) −0.0023 (9)
C11 0.0273 (13) 0.0368 (14) 0.0405 (16) −0.0042 (11) 0.0034 (11) 0.0005 (12)
O12 0.0471 (12) 0.0582 (13) 0.0341 (11) 0.0019 (10) −0.0039 (9) 0.0026 (10)
C13 0.0395 (17) 0.0447 (17) 0.064 (2) 0.0024 (13) 0.0077 (16) −0.0079 (16)
O14 0.0384 (11) 0.0465 (11) 0.0366 (11) −0.0045 (9) 0.0025 (9) −0.0017 (9)
C15 0.0315 (14) 0.0392 (15) 0.0399 (16) 0.0031 (11) −0.0014 (12) −0.0018 (12)
O16 0.0441 (12) 0.0536 (12) 0.0371 (11) −0.0046 (10) 0.0056 (9) −0.0008 (10)
C17 0.0405 (17) 0.0480 (17) 0.062 (2) −0.0092 (14) 0.0007 (16) −0.0118 (16)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

Cu1—O14 1.9797 (19) C4—H4A 0.98
Cu1—O10 1.9813 (19) C4—H4B 0.98
Cu1—O12 2.509 (2) C6—H6A 0.97
Cu1—O16 2.531 (2) C6—H6B 0.97
Cu1—N2 2.037 (2) C6—H6C 0.97
Cu1—N5 2.047 (2) C7—H7A 0.97
N2—C8 1.478 (4) C7—H7B 0.97
N2—C9 1.480 (4) C7—H7C 0.97
N2—C3 1.489 (4) C8—H8A 0.97
C3—C4 1.505 (4) C8—H8B 0.97
C4—N5 1.489 (4) C8—H8C 0.97
N5—C6 1.470 (4) C9—H9A 0.97
N5—C7 1.477 (4) C9—H9B 0.97
O10—C11 1.280 (4) C9—H9C 0.97
C11—O12 1.241 (3) C13—H13A 0.97
C11—C13 1.514 (4) C13—H13B 0.97
O14—C15 1.278 (4) C13—H13C 0.97
C15—O16 1.243 (4) C17—H17A 0.97
C15—C17 1.512 (4) C17—H17B 0.97
C3—H3A 0.98 C17—H17C 0.97
C3—H3B 0.98
O14—Cu1—O10 92.08 (9) H4A—C4—H4B 108
O14—Cu1—N2 164.30 (9) N5—C6—H6A 109
O10—Cu1—N2 93.12 (9) N5—C6—H6B 109
O14—Cu1—N5 92.40 (9) N5—C6—H6C 109
O10—Cu1—N5 165.18 (9) H6A—C6—H6B 109
N2—Cu1—N5 86.30 (9) H6A—C6—H6C 109
C8—N2—C9 109.1 (2) H6B—C6—H6C 109
C8—N2—C3 110.3 (2) N5—C7—H7A 109
C9—N2—C3 110.2 (2) N5—C7—H7B 109
C8—N2—Cu1 112.67 (18) N5—C7—H7C 109
C9—N2—Cu1 108.25 (18) H7A—C7—H7B 109
C3—N2—Cu1 106.29 (17) H7A—C7—H7C 110
N2—C3—C4 108.7 (2) H7B—C7—H7C 109
N5—C4—C3 109.1 (2) N2—C8—H8A 109
C6—N5—C7 109.7 (3) N2—C8—H8B 109
C6—N5—C4 110.7 (2) N2—C8—H8C 109
C7—N5—C4 110.0 (2) H8A—C8—H8B 109
C6—N5—Cu1 111.94 (19) H8A—C8—H8C 109
C7—N5—Cu1 108.74 (19) H8B—C8—H8C 110
C4—N5—Cu1 105.74 (17) N2—C9—H9A 109
C11—O10—Cu1 101.36 (17) N2—C9—H9B 109
O12—C11—O10 122.6 (3) N2—C9—H9C 109
O12—C11—C13 120.1 (3) H9A—C9—H9B 110
O10—C11—C13 117.3 (3) H9A—C9—H9C 110
C15—O14—Cu1 102.12 (18) H9B—C9—H9C 109
O16—C15—O14 122.7 (3) C11—C13—H13A 109
O16—C15—C17 120.2 (3) C11—C13—H13B 110
O14—C15—C17 117.0 (3) C11—C13—H13C 110
N2—C3—H3A 110 H13A—C13—H13B 109
N2—C3—H3B 110 H13A—C13—H13C 109
C4—C3—H3A 110 H13B—C13—H13C 109
C4—C3—H3B 110 C15—C17—H17A 110
H3A—C3—H3B 108 C15—C17—H17B 109
N5—C4—H4A 110 C15—C17—H17C 109
N5—C4—H4B 110 H17A—C17—H17B 109
C3—C4—H4A 110 H17A—C17—H17C 110
C3—C4—H4B 110 H17B—C17—H17C 109
O14—Cu1—N2—C8 −167.6 (3) N2—Cu1—N5—C6 106.3 (2)
O10—Cu1—N2—C8 −58.42 (19) O14—Cu1—N5—C7 63.3 (2)
N5—Cu1—N2—C8 106.75 (19) O10—Cu1—N5—C7 −44.1 (5)
O14—Cu1—N2—C9 −46.9 (4) N2—Cu1—N5—C7 −132.3 (2)
O10—Cu1—N2—C9 62.3 (2) O14—Cu1—N5—C4 −178.58 (17)
N5—Cu1—N2—C9 −132.6 (2) O10—Cu1—N5—C4 74.0 (4)
O14—Cu1—N2—C3 71.5 (4) N2—Cu1—N5—C4 −14.25 (17)
O10—Cu1—N2—C3 −179.34 (17) O14—Cu1—O10—C11 −90.25 (17)
N5—Cu1—N2—C3 −14.18 (18) N2—Cu1—O10—C11 104.56 (18)
C8—N2—C3—C4 −82.3 (3) N5—Cu1—O10—C11 17.2 (4)
C9—N2—C3—C4 157.2 (2) Cu1—O10—C11—O12 −5.8 (3)
Cu1—N2—C3—C4 40.1 (3) Cu1—O10—C11—C13 174.5 (2)
N2—C3—C4—N5 −55.2 (3) O10—Cu1—O14—C15 −87.43 (18)
C3—C4—N5—C6 −81.1 (3) N2—Cu1—O14—C15 21.9 (4)
C3—C4—N5—C7 157.5 (3) N5—Cu1—O14—C15 106.71 (19)
C3—C4—N5—Cu1 40.3 (3) Cu1—O14—C15—O16 −4.8 (3)
O14—Cu1—N5—C6 −58.0 (2) Cu1—O14—C15—C17 176.6 (2)
O10—Cu1—N5—C6 −165.4 (3)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
C3—H3A···O12i 0.98 2.34 3.281 (4) 160
C4—H4A···O16ii 0.98 2.50 3.475 (4) 176
C13—H13C···O16iii 0.97 2.54 3.507 (4) 173
C17—H17C···O12iv 0.97 2.58 3.542 (4) 170

Symmetry codes: (i) x−1/2, −y+1/2, z+1/2; (ii) x−1/2, −y+1/2, z−1/2; (iii) x+1/2, −y+1/2, z−1/2; (iv) x+1/2, −y+1/2, z+1/2.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: SI2074).

References

  1. Altomare, A., Burla, M. C., Camalli, M., Cascarano, G. L., Giacovazzo, C., Guagliardi, A., Moliterni, A. G. G., Polidori, G. & Spagna, R. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst.32, 115–119.
  2. Brown, D. A., Errington, W., Fitzpatrick, N. J., Glass, W. K., Kemp, T. J., Nimir, H. & Ryan, Á. T. (2002). Chem. Commun. pp. 1210–1211. [DOI] [PubMed]
  3. Dalai, S., Sarathi Mukherjee, P., Rogez, G., Mallah, T., Drew, M. G. B. & Ray Chaudhuri, N. (2002). Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. pp. 3292–3297.
  4. Devereux, M., O’Shea, D., O’Connor, M., Grehan, H., Connor, G., McCann, M., Rosair, G., Lyng, F., Kellett, A., Walsh, M., Egan, D. & Thati, B. (2007). Polyhedron, 26, 4073–4084.
  5. Gerdes, G. (2004). PhD thesis, ETH Zürich, Switzerland.
  6. Gerdes, G. & Chen, P. (2004). Organometallics, 23, 3031–3036.
  7. Margraf, G., Bats, J. W., Wagner, M. & Lerner, H.-W. (2005). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 358, 1193–1203.
  8. Nonius (2000). COLLECT Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands.
  9. Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 276, Macromolecular Crystallography, Part A, edited by C. W. Carter Jr & R. M. Sweet, pp. 307–326. New York: Academic Press.
  10. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  11. Slootweg, J. C. & Chen, P. (2006). Organometallics, 25, 5863–5869.
  12. Spek, A. L. (2003). J. Appl. Cryst.36, 7–13.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808002584/si2074sup1.cif

e-64-0m430-sup1.cif (18.6KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808002584/si2074Isup2.hkl

e-64-0m430-Isup2.hkl (133.1KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES