Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2008 Jan 4;64(Pt 2):o351. doi: 10.1107/S1600536807067463

Melaminium sulfate

Bao-Yong Zhu a, De-Liang Cui a, Hai-Peng Jing a,*
PMCID: PMC2960347  PMID: 21201383

Abstract

In the title compound, C3H8N6 2+·SO4 2−, the melaminium cations and sulfate anions are inter­connected by N—H⋯N and N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, forming a layer in the (101) plane. The layers are connected through multiple hydrogen bonds and π–π stacking inter­actions (centroid–centroid distance of about 3.4 Å).

Related literature

For related literature, see: Janczak & Perpétuo (2001a ,b ); Martin & Pinkerton (1995); Dewar et al. (1985).graphic file with name e-64-0o351-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • C3H8N6 2+·SO4 2−

  • M r = 224.21

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 18.5787 (3) Å

  • b = 8.6272 (2) Å

  • c = 12.7945 (4) Å

  • β = 129.739 (1)°

  • V = 1576.94 (7) Å3

  • Z = 8

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.42 mm−1

  • T = 293 (2) K

  • 0.32 × 0.27 × 0.26 mm

Data collection

  • Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (APEX2; Bruker, 2005) T min = 0.878, T max = 0.900

  • 3793 measured reflections

  • 1794 independent reflections

  • 1672 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.013

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.031

  • wR(F 2) = 0.088

  • S = 1.00

  • 1794 reflections

  • 136 parameters

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 0.48 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.45 e Å−3

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2005); cell refinement: APEX2; data reduction: APEX2; program(s) used to solve structure: SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Bruker, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536807067463/bt2656sup1.cif

e-64-0o351-sup1.cif (14.8KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536807067463/bt2656Isup2.hkl

e-64-0o351-Isup2.hkl (88.5KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N6—H6⋯O2i 0.87 (3) 1.76 (3) 2.622 (2) 171 (3)
N5—H5⋯O4ii 0.85 (3) 1.76 (3) 2.608 (2) 176 (3)
N3—H3B⋯O2i 0.86 2.59 3.244 (2) 134
N3—H3B⋯O1iii 0.86 2.44 2.944 (2) 118
N3—H3A⋯N4iv 0.86 2.14 3.000 (2) 176
N2—H2B⋯O3i 0.86 1.97 2.822 (2) 172
N2—H2A⋯O3v 0.86 2.02 2.836 (2) 159
N1—H1B⋯O2ii 0.86 1.99 2.838 (2) 169
N1—H1A⋯O1vi 0.86 2.43 2.992 (2) 123
N1—H1A⋯O1vii 0.86 2.11 2.887 (2) 151

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic; (iii) Inline graphic; (iv) Inline graphic; (v) Inline graphic; (vi) Inline graphic; (vii) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

We thank Professor Wen-Tao Yu and Mr Jian-Dong Fan for the data collection and helpful discussions. This work was supported by the Science and Technology Research Program of the Ministry of Education, China (grant No. 305010).

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

Salts of melamine and its derivatives can develop supramolecular structures via hydrogen bonding by self assembly. Monoprotonated melaminium sulfate hydrate, (C3H7N6)2 SO4.H2O, has been structurally investigated (Janczak & Perpétuo, 2001b). We present here the solid state structure of anhydrous diprotonated melaminium salt.

The internal C—N—C angle at the protonated N atoms [C2—N6—C3 120.35 (15) ° and C2—N5—C1 120.25 (15) °] is significantly larger than the C—N—C angle at the non-protonated N atom [C1—N4—C3 116.79 (15) °]. These differences are due to the steric effect of the lone-pair electrons and are fully consistent with the valence-shell electron-pair repulsion theory (Janczak & Perpétuo, 2001a). The two shortest bonds [N4—C3 1.333 (2) Å and N4—C1 1.338 (2) Å] are those furthest from the protonated ring N atoms. The two longest bonds [N6—C3 1.367 (2) Å and N5—C1 1.373 (2) Å] are those connected to the shortest bonds. This has the effect of opening up the ring bond angles at atoms C1 and C3, thus creating the largest bond angles in the ring [N4—C3—N6 122.4 (1) ° and N4—C1—N5 122.1 (1) °]. A semi-empirical calculation, with the AM1 parameter set (Dewar et al., 1985) on the melaminium residue diprotonated at two ring N atoms, results in almost the same geometrical features as being found in the title compound. The distortion of the aromatic ring is quite similar to that reported for the melaminium diperchlorate monohydrate salt (Martin & Pinkerton, 1995), as well as for melaminium bis(4-hydroxybenzene-sulfonate) dihydrate (Janczak & Perpétuo, 2001a).

The melaminium residue is involved in eleven hydrogen bonds, two N—H···N bonds with the neighbouring melaminium residue and nine N—H···O bonds with six neighbouring SO42- anions. Two of the SO42- anions are acceptors of two and three hydrogen bonds, respectively, while the other four are acceptors of one hydrogen bond each (Fig. 2). The H atoms at the protonated N atoms of the melaminium residue are involved in almost linear N—H···O hydrogen bonds.

Each SO42- ion is involved as an acceptor in nine hydrogen bonds connecting to six melaminium residues. The O1 and O2 atoms are the most interesting ones as they all accept three hydrogen atoms each. O3 forms two hydrogen bonds with melaminium residues via the H atoms of the amino groups, and O4 forms only one hydrogen bond via H5 atom at the protonated N atom of the melaminium residue.

The melaminium residues are interconnected by two almost linear N—H···N hydrogen bonds and five N—H···O hydrogen bonds. The distance between the centroids of the aromatic rings in adjacent layers (symmetry operator 2 - x, +y, 1.5 - z) is about 3.4 Å, which is much shorter than the maximum distance for the π-π stacking interaction (3.8 Å for centroid-centroid distance), indicating strong π-π stacking interactions. The two-dimensional layers are extensively interconnected by multiple hydrongen bonds with sulfate anions and π-π stacking interactions (Fig. 3).

Experimental

0.126 g (0.001 mol) of melamine was dissolved in 50 ml hot water. To this solution 4 ml 98% sulfate acid was slowly added. After several days, colorless crystals of (I) appeared.

Refinement

The H atoms bonded to the ring N atoms were located in difference Fourier map and their positions and displacement parameters were refined freely. The amino H atoms were added geometrically and treated as riding, with N—H = 0.86 Å and Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(N).

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

View of the asymmetric unit of (I) showing the atom-labelling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. H atoms are represented by circles of arbitrary size.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Diagram showing the hydrogen bonds of the melaminium cation. symmetry codes: (i) x, y + 1, z; (ii) -x + 1, -y, -z + 1; (iii) -x + 1, -y + 1, -z + 1; (iv) -x + 1, y, -z + 1/2; (v) -x + 1, y + 1, -z + 1/2; (vi) -x + 3/2, y + 1/2, -z + 1/2; (vii) x, -y, z + 1/2; (viii) x, -y + 1, z + 1/2; (ix) x - 1/2, -y + 1/2, z + 1/2.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

The molecular packing of (I) in the unit cell showing the hydrogen-bonding interaction (dashed lines).

Crystal data

C3H8N62+·SO42– F000 = 928
Mr = 224.21 Dx = 1.889 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/c Mo Kα radiation λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 18.5787 (3) Å Cell parameters from 2920 reflections
b = 8.6272 (2) Å θ = 2.8–27.5º
c = 12.7945 (4) Å µ = 0.42 mm1
β = 129.7390 (10)º T = 293 (2) K
V = 1576.94 (7) Å3 Prism, colorless
Z = 8 0.32 × 0.27 × 0.26 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEX2 CCD diffractometer 1794 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 1672 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Monochromator: graphite Rint = 0.013
T = 293(2) K θmax = 27.5º
φ and ω scans θmin = 2.8º
Absorption correction: multi-scan(APEX2; Bruker, 2005) h = −24→19
Tmin = 0.879, Tmax = 0.900 k = −6→11
3793 measured reflections l = −16→16

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
Least-squares matrix: full H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.031   w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.041P)2 + 3.6165P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.089 (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
S = 1.00 Δρmax = 0.48 e Å3
1794 reflections Δρmin = −0.45 e Å3
136 parameters Extinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods Extinction coefficient: 0.0037 (5)
Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
S1 0.65733 (3) 0.06360 (5) 0.27385 (4) 0.02105 (15)
O2 0.63929 (12) 0.11467 (16) 0.36667 (16) 0.0369 (4)
O4 0.70593 (10) −0.08710 (15) 0.32413 (17) 0.0348 (4)
C2 0.84604 (12) 0.9717 (2) 0.65207 (17) 0.0210 (3)
N5 0.86032 (10) 0.82418 (17) 0.63479 (15) 0.0215 (3)
N3 0.95352 (12) 1.16685 (18) 0.54108 (18) 0.0312 (4)
H3A 0.9834 1.1488 0.5118 0.037*
H3B 0.9448 1.2607 0.5534 0.037*
O3 0.71951 (10) 0.17704 (15) 0.28119 (15) 0.0309 (3)
N2 0.80592 (11) 1.00382 (18) 0.70342 (17) 0.0277 (3)
H2A 0.7879 0.9301 0.7272 0.033*
H2B 0.7974 1.0988 0.7136 0.033*
C3 0.92125 (12) 1.0513 (2) 0.56700 (18) 0.0222 (3)
N4 0.93490 (11) 0.90603 (17) 0.54780 (16) 0.0236 (3)
N1 0.91024 (13) 0.64908 (18) 0.55885 (18) 0.0317 (4)
H1A 0.9372 0.6259 0.5259 0.038*
H1B 0.8889 0.5768 0.5787 0.038*
O1 0.56934 (11) 0.0514 (2) 0.13681 (16) 0.0440 (4)
N6 0.87638 (11) 1.08607 (18) 0.61675 (16) 0.0232 (3)
C1 0.90174 (12) 0.7934 (2) 0.57868 (17) 0.0219 (3)
H6 0.8684 (18) 1.183 (3) 0.626 (2) 0.042 (7)*
H5 0.8388 (18) 0.749 (3) 0.651 (3) 0.044 (7)*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
S1 0.0277 (2) 0.0160 (2) 0.0288 (2) 0.00029 (15) 0.0224 (2) 0.00143 (15)
O2 0.0657 (10) 0.0212 (7) 0.0574 (9) −0.0009 (7) 0.0549 (9) −0.0015 (6)
O4 0.0425 (8) 0.0182 (6) 0.0605 (10) 0.0067 (6) 0.0408 (8) 0.0085 (6)
C2 0.0228 (8) 0.0197 (8) 0.0233 (8) −0.0007 (6) 0.0160 (7) −0.0004 (6)
N5 0.0284 (7) 0.0166 (7) 0.0289 (7) −0.0010 (6) 0.0226 (7) 0.0004 (6)
N3 0.0438 (9) 0.0183 (7) 0.0528 (10) −0.0030 (7) 0.0407 (9) −0.0011 (7)
O3 0.0416 (8) 0.0189 (6) 0.0502 (8) −0.0047 (5) 0.0377 (7) −0.0022 (6)
N2 0.0395 (9) 0.0202 (7) 0.0418 (9) −0.0002 (6) 0.0345 (8) −0.0006 (6)
C3 0.0246 (8) 0.0201 (8) 0.0274 (8) −0.0013 (6) 0.0191 (7) −0.0010 (6)
N4 0.0296 (8) 0.0185 (7) 0.0345 (8) −0.0010 (6) 0.0259 (7) −0.0010 (6)
N1 0.0519 (10) 0.0172 (7) 0.0516 (10) −0.0016 (7) 0.0449 (9) −0.0018 (7)
O1 0.0361 (8) 0.0554 (10) 0.0329 (8) −0.0085 (7) 0.0185 (7) 0.0045 (7)
N6 0.0320 (8) 0.0156 (7) 0.0330 (8) −0.0002 (6) 0.0259 (7) −0.0012 (6)
C1 0.0254 (8) 0.0194 (8) 0.0262 (8) −0.0003 (6) 0.0188 (7) −0.0007 (6)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

S1—O1 1.447 (1) N3—H3B 0.8600
S1—O3 1.471 (1) N2—H2A 0.8600
S1—O4 1.475 (1) N2—H2B 0.8600
S1—O2 1.492 (1) C3—N4 1.333 (2)
C2—N2 1.300 (2) C3—N6 1.367 (2)
C2—N5 1.347 (2) N4—C1 1.338 (2)
C2—N6 1.350 (2) N1—C1 1.300 (2)
N5—C1 1.373 (2) N1—H1A 0.8600
N5—H5 0.85 (3) N1—H1B 0.8600
N3—C3 1.310 (2) N6—H6 0.87 (3)
N3—H3A 0.8600
O1—S1—O3 111.02 (9) C2—N2—H2B 120.0
O1—S1—O4 111.51 (10) H2A—N2—H2B 120.0
O3—S1—O4 108.77 (8) N3—C3—N4 119.80 (16)
O1—S1—O2 109.36 (10) N3—C3—N6 117.71 (16)
O3—S1—O2 108.65 (8) N4—C3—N6 122.46 (16)
O4—S1—O2 107.42 (9) C3—N4—C1 116.79 (15)
N2—C2—N5 121.41 (16) C1—N1—H1A 120.0
N2—C2—N6 120.69 (16) C1—N1—H1B 120.0
N5—C2—N6 117.88 (15) H1A—N1—H1B 120.0
C2—N5—C1 120.25 (15) C2—N6—C3 120.35 (15)
C2—N5—H5 120.6 (18) C2—N6—H6 120.8 (17)
C1—N5—H5 118.9 (19) C3—N6—H6 118.8 (17)
C3—N3—H3A 120.0 N1—C1—N4 120.09 (16)
C3—N3—H3B 120.0 N1—C1—N5 117.76 (16)
H3A—N3—H3B 120.0 N4—C1—N5 122.13 (15)
C2—N2—H2A 120.0
N2—C2—N5—C1 179.14 (16) N3—C3—N6—C2 −176.50 (17)
N6—C2—N5—C1 −2.1 (2) N4—C3—N6—C2 1.8 (3)
N3—C3—N4—C1 178.76 (17) C3—N4—C1—N1 178.06 (18)
N6—C3—N4—C1 0.5 (3) C3—N4—C1—N5 −3.6 (3)
N2—C2—N6—C3 177.84 (17) C2—N5—C1—N1 −177.10 (17)
N5—C2—N6—C3 −0.9 (3) C2—N5—C1—N4 4.6 (3)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
N6—H6···O2i 0.87 (3) 1.76 (3) 2.622 (2) 171 (3)
N5—H5···O4ii 0.85 (3) 1.76 (3) 2.608 (2) 176 (3)
N3—H3B···O2i 0.86 2.59 3.244 (2) 134
N3—H3B···O1iii 0.86 2.44 2.944 (2) 118
N3—H3A···N4iv 0.86 2.14 3.000 (2) 176
N2—H2B···O3i 0.86 1.97 2.822 (2) 172
N2—H2A···O3v 0.86 2.02 2.836 (2) 159
N1—H1B···O2ii 0.86 1.99 2.838 (2) 169
N1—H1A···O1vi 0.86 2.43 2.992 (2) 123
N1—H1A···O1vii 0.86 2.11 2.887 (2) 151

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+3/2, −y+3/2, −z+1; (ii) −x+3/2, −y+1/2, −z+1; (iii) x+1/2, −y+3/2, z+1/2; (iv) −x+2, −y+2, −z+1; (v) x, −y+1, z+1/2; (vi) x+1/2, −y+1/2, z+1/2; (vii) −x+3/2, y+1/2, −z+1/2.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: BT2656).

References

  1. Altomare, A., Burla, M. C., Camalli, M., Cascarano, G. L., Giacovazzo, C., Guagliardi, A., Moliterni, A. G. G., Polidori, G. & Spagna, R. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst.32, 115–119.
  2. Bruker (1997). SHELXTL Version 5.1. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  3. Bruker (2005). APEX2 Version 2.0-2. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  4. Dewar, M. J. S., Zoebisch, E. G., Healy, E. F. & Stewart, J. J. P. (1985). J. Am. Chem. Soc.107, 3902–3909.
  5. Farrugia, L. J. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst.32, 837–838.
  6. Janczak, J. & Perpétuo, G. J. (2001a). Acta Cryst. C57, 873–875. [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. Janczak, J. & Perpétuo, G. J. (2001b). Acta Cryst. C57, 1431–1433. [DOI] [PubMed]
  8. Martin, A. & Pinkerton, A. A. (1995). Acta Cryst. C51, 2174–2177.
  9. Sheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXL97 University of Göttingen, Germany.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536807067463/bt2656sup1.cif

e-64-0o351-sup1.cif (14.8KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536807067463/bt2656Isup2.hkl

e-64-0o351-Isup2.hkl (88.5KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES