Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2008 Aug 16;64(Pt 9):m1181–m1182. doi: 10.1107/S1600536808026093

{5,5′-Dihydr­oxy-2,2′-[o-phenyl­enebis­(nitrilo­methyl­idyne)]diphenolato}nickel(II) dihydrate

Hoong-Kun Fun a,*, Reza Kia a,, Valiollah Mirkhani b,§, Hasan Zargoshi b
PMCID: PMC2960688  PMID: 21201624

Abstract

In the title complex, [Ni(C20H14N2O4)]·2H2O, the NiII ion is in an essentially square-planar geometry involving an N2O2 atom set of the tetra­dentate Schiff base ligand. The Ni atom lies on a crystallographic twofold rotation axis. The asymmetric unit contains one half-mol­ecule of the complex and a water mol­ecule. An inter­molecular O—H⋯O hydrogen bond forms a four-membered ring, producing an R 1 2(4) ring motif involving a bifurcated hydrogen bond to the phenolate O atoms of the complex mol­ecule. In the crystal structure, mol­ecules are linked by π–π stacking inter­actions, with centroid–centroid distances in the range 3.5750 (11)–3.7750 (11) Å. As a result of the twofold symmetry, the central benzene ring makes the same dihedral angle of 15.75 (9)° with the two outer benzene rings. The dihedral angle between the two hydroxy­phenyl rings is 13.16 (5)°. In the crystal structure, mol­ecules are linked into infinite one-dimensional chains by directed four-membered O—H⋯O—H inter­actions along the c axis and are further connected by C—H⋯O and π–π stacking into a three-dimensional network. An inter­esting feature of the crystal structure is the short Ni⋯O, O⋯O and N⋯N inter­actions which are shorter than the sum of the van der Waals radii of the relevant atoms. The crystal structure is stabilized by inter­molecular O—H⋯O and C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds and by π–π stacking inter­actions.

Related literature

For bond-length data, see Allen et al. (1987). For hydrogen-bond motifs, see: Bernstein et al. (1995). For related structures, see, for example: Clark et al. (1968, 1969, 1970); Hodgson 1975. For applications and bioactivities, see, for example: Elmali et al. (2000); Blower (1998); Granovski et al. (1993); Li & Chang (1991); Shahrokhian et al. (2000); Fun & Kia (2008a,b ).graphic file with name e-64-m1181-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • [Ni(C20H14N2O4)]·2H2O

  • M r = 441.07

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 10.9049 (2) Å

  • b = 17.6602 (3) Å

  • c = 9.0375 (3) Å

  • β = 101.150 (1)°

  • V = 1707.61 (7) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 1.18 mm−1

  • T = 100.0 (1) K

  • 0.35 × 0.12 × 0.11 mm

Data collection

  • Bruker SMART APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2005) T min = 0.683, T max = 0.881

  • 14574 measured reflections

  • 3566 independent reflections

  • 2388 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.046

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.048

  • wR(F 2) = 0.120

  • S = 1.12

  • 3566 reflections

  • 136 parameters

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 0.61 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.73 e Å−3

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2005); cell refinement: APEX2; data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2005); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL and PLATON (Spek, 2003).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808026093/pk2114sup1.cif

e-64-m1181-sup1.cif (17.3KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808026093/pk2114Isup2.hkl

e-64-m1181-Isup2.hkl (175KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Selected interatomic distances (Å).

Cg1, Cg2, Cg3, and Cg4 are the centroids of the Ni1/N1/C8/C8A/N1A, Ni1/O1/C1/C6/C7/N1, Ni1/O1A/C1A/C6A/C7A/N1A and C1–C6 rings, respectively.

Cg1⋯Cg4i 3.7364 (11)
Cg2⋯Cg2i 3.7380 (9)
Cg2⋯Cg3ii 3.7381 (9)
Cg3⋯Cg4iii 3.5766 (10)
Cg4⋯Cg4iv 3.7750 (11)
Ni1⋯O1Wv 3.7635 (13)
O1⋯O1v 2.4319 (18)
N1⋯N1v 2.525 (2)

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic; (iii) Inline graphic; (iv) Inline graphic; (v) Inline graphic.

Table 2. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O1W—H1W1⋯O1 0.88 2.40 3.0733 (18) 133
O1W—H1W1⋯O1v 0.88 1.97 2.8072 (19) 160
O1W—H2W1⋯O2vi 0.83 2.17 2.9985 (19) 173
C9—H9A⋯O2vii 0.93 2.60 3.394 (2) 144

Symmetry codes: (v) Inline graphic; (vi) Inline graphic; (vii) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

HKF and RK thank the Malaysian Government and Universiti Sains Malaysia for the Science Fund grant No. 305/PFIZIK/613312. RK thanks Universiti Sains Malaysia for a post-doctoral research fellowship.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

Schiff base complexes are some of the most important stereochemical models in transition metal coordination chemistry, with their ease of preparation and structural variations (Granovski et al., 1993). Many of the reported structural investigations of these complexes are discussed in some details in a review (Hodgson, 1975). Metal derivatives of Schiff bases have been studied extensively, and Cu(II) and Ni(II) complexes play a major role in both synthetic and structural research (Elmali et al., 2000; Blower, 1998; Fun & Kia, 2008a,b; Granovski et al., 1993; Li & Chang, 1991; Shahrokhian et al., 2000). Tetradentate Schiff base metal complexes may form trans or cis planar or tetrahedral structures (Elmali et al., 2000).

In the title compound (Fig. 1), the NiII ion, is in an essentially square-planar geometry involving a N2O2 atom set of the tetradentate Schiff base ligand. The Ni atom lies on a crystallographic twofold rotation axis. An intermolecular O—H···O hydrogen bond forms a four-membered ring, producing an R21(4) ring motif (Bernstein et al., 1995). The bond lengths are within the normal ranges (Allen et al., 1987). The asymmetric unit contains one-half of the molecule of the complex and a water molecule. The latter shows a bifurcated hydrogen bond which is connected to the phenolato oxygen atoms of the complex. The molecule is nearly planar, with a maximum deviation from the mean plane of 0.370 (2) Å for atom C9. As a result of the twofold symmetry, the central benzene ring makes the same dihedral angle of 15.75 (9)° with the two outer benzene rings. The dihedral angle between the two hydroxy phenyl rings is 13.16 (5)°. In the crystal structure, (Fig. 2) molecules are linked into infinite one-dimensional chains by directed four-membered O—H···O—H interactions along the c axis and are furthered connected by C—H···O and π-π stacking into a three-dimensional network.

An interesting feature of the crystal structure is the short Ni···O, O···O, and N···N interactions (Table 1), which are shorter than the sum of the van der Waals radii of the relevant atoms. The short distances between the centroids of the five- and six-membered rings indicate the existence of the π-π interactions (Table 1). The crystal structure is stabilized by intermolecular O—H···O, C—H···O hydrogen bonds (Table 2) and π-π interactions.

Experimental

A chloroform solution (40 ml) of the ligand (1 mmol, 354 mg) was added to a methanol solution (20 ml) of NiCl2.6H2O (1.05 mmol, 237 mg). The mixture was refluxed for 30 min and the resulting red precipitate was filtered, washed with cold ethanol and dried in air. Single crystals suitable for X-ray analysis were obtained from a THF solution at RT.

Refinement

The water H-atoms were located in a difference Fourier map and refined as riding on the parent atom with an isotropic displacement parameter of 1.5Ueq of the water oxygen. The hydroxyl H atoms were also located in a difference Fourier map and refined freely. The rest of the hydrogen atoms were positioned geometrically [C—H = 0.93 Å] and refined using a riding model.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The molecular structure of the title compound, showing 50% probability displacement ellipsoids and the atomic numbering scheme. Intermolecular hydrogen bonds are drawn as dashed lines.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

The crystal packing viewed down the b axis, showing one-dimensional extended chains involving the directed four membered O—H···O—H hydrogen bonds along the c axis. Intermolecular interactions are drawn as dashed lines.

Crystal data

[Ni(C20H14N2O4)]·2H2O F000 = 912
Mr = 441.07 Dx = 1.716 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/c Mo Kα radiation λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2yc Cell parameters from 3113 reflections
a = 10.9049 (2) Å θ = 2.3–29.1º
b = 17.6602 (3) Å µ = 1.18 mm1
c = 9.0375 (3) Å T = 100.0 (1) K
β = 101.150 (1)º Block, red
V = 1707.61 (7) Å3 0.35 × 0.12 × 0.11 mm
Z = 4

Data collection

Bruker SMART APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer 3566 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 2388 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Monochromator: graphite Rint = 0.046
T = 100.0(1) K θmax = 34.3º
φ and ω scans θmin = 2.2º
Absorption correction: multi-scan(SADABS; Bruker, 2005) h = −17→17
Tmin = 0.683, Tmax = 0.881 k = −23→27
14574 measured reflections l = −14→14

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.048 H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.121   w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0492P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.12 (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
3566 reflections Δρmax = 0.61 e Å3
136 parameters Δρmin = −0.73 e Å3
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods Extinction correction: none

Special details

Experimental. The low-temperature data was collected with the Oxford Cryosystem Cobra low-temperature attachment
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Ni1 0.0000 0.246535 (17) 0.7500 0.01493 (11)
O1 0.04391 (12) 0.32501 (7) 0.88434 (14) 0.0174 (3)
O2 0.18665 (13) 0.44913 (8) 1.35074 (15) 0.0215 (3)
N1 0.06039 (14) 0.17016 (8) 0.88409 (17) 0.0152 (3)
C1 0.09715 (16) 0.32009 (10) 1.0287 (2) 0.0159 (4)
C2 0.11546 (17) 0.38691 (10) 1.1132 (2) 0.0175 (4)
H2A 0.0908 0.4329 1.0668 0.021*
C3 0.16965 (17) 0.38546 (10) 1.2647 (2) 0.0161 (4)
C4 0.21006 (17) 0.31684 (11) 1.3364 (2) 0.0200 (4)
H4A 0.2474 0.3160 1.4380 0.024*
C5 0.1937 (2) 0.25113 (10) 1.2545 (2) 0.0192 (4)
H5A 0.2218 0.2058 1.3015 0.023*
C6 0.13518 (18) 0.25029 (10) 1.1002 (2) 0.0160 (3)
C7 0.11768 (17) 0.17979 (10) 1.0251 (2) 0.0172 (4)
H7A 0.1490 0.1369 1.0793 0.021*
C8 0.03852 (17) 0.09645 (10) 0.8211 (2) 0.0181 (4)
C9 0.08370 (18) 0.02822 (10) 0.8878 (2) 0.0206 (4)
H9A 0.1404 0.0281 0.9790 0.025*
C10 0.04344 (18) −0.03919 (11) 0.8171 (2) 0.0232 (4)
H10A 0.0748 −0.0849 0.8598 0.028*
O1W 0.15531 (13) 0.42836 (7) 0.67062 (15) 0.0240 (3)
H1W1 0.0971 0.3950 0.6774 0.036*
H2W1 0.1630 0.4380 0.5829 0.036*
H1O2 0.170 (2) 0.4836 (15) 1.304 (3) 0.047 (9)*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Ni1 0.01935 (18) 0.01096 (18) 0.01281 (16) 0.000 −0.00102 (12) 0.000
O1 0.0240 (7) 0.0128 (6) 0.0126 (6) 0.0004 (5) −0.0033 (5) −0.0004 (5)
O2 0.0320 (8) 0.0146 (7) 0.0156 (6) −0.0001 (6) −0.0007 (6) −0.0040 (6)
N1 0.0177 (7) 0.0109 (7) 0.0161 (7) −0.0006 (6) 0.0012 (6) −0.0003 (6)
C1 0.0189 (8) 0.0149 (9) 0.0129 (8) 0.0002 (7) 0.0002 (7) 0.0020 (7)
C2 0.0201 (9) 0.0156 (9) 0.0148 (8) −0.0007 (7) −0.0012 (7) 0.0009 (7)
C3 0.0192 (9) 0.0142 (9) 0.0145 (8) −0.0009 (7) 0.0020 (7) −0.0020 (7)
C4 0.0260 (10) 0.0209 (10) 0.0111 (8) 0.0015 (8) −0.0011 (7) 0.0013 (7)
C5 0.0256 (10) 0.0168 (9) 0.0139 (8) 0.0010 (7) 0.0006 (7) 0.0047 (7)
C6 0.0189 (8) 0.0154 (9) 0.0126 (7) −0.0004 (7) 0.0004 (6) 0.0010 (7)
C7 0.0215 (9) 0.0132 (9) 0.0158 (8) 0.0007 (7) 0.0009 (7) 0.0040 (7)
C8 0.0192 (9) 0.0151 (9) 0.0188 (9) 0.0006 (7) 0.0011 (7) 0.0016 (7)
C9 0.0224 (9) 0.0173 (9) 0.0207 (9) 0.0005 (8) 0.0007 (7) 0.0022 (8)
C10 0.0293 (11) 0.0153 (9) 0.0252 (10) 0.0014 (8) 0.0055 (8) 0.0039 (8)
O1W 0.0312 (8) 0.0175 (7) 0.0232 (7) −0.0055 (6) 0.0050 (6) 0.0009 (6)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

Ni1—O1 1.8436 (12) C4—C5 1.369 (3)
Ni1—O1i 1.8436 (12) C4—H4A 0.9300
Ni1—N1i 1.8474 (15) C5—C6 1.417 (3)
Ni1—N1 1.8474 (15) C5—H5A 0.9300
O1—C1 1.324 (2) C6—C7 1.414 (2)
O2—C3 1.359 (2) C7—H7A 0.9300
O2—H1O2 0.74 (3) C8—C8i 1.392 (4)
N1—C7 1.317 (2) C8—C9 1.394 (2)
N1—C8 1.422 (2) C9—C10 1.382 (3)
C1—C2 1.399 (2) C9—H9A 0.9300
C1—C6 1.416 (2) C10—C10i 1.387 (4)
C2—C3 1.383 (2) C10—H10A 0.9300
C2—H2A 0.9300 O1W—H1W1 0.8771
C3—C4 1.404 (3) O1W—H2W1 0.8309
Cg1···Cg4ii 3.7364 (11) Cg4···Cg4v 3.7750 (11)
Cg2···Cg2ii 3.7380 (9) Ni1···O1Wi 3.7635 (13)
Cg2···Cg3iii 3.7381 (9) O1···O1i 2.4319 (18)
Cg3···Cg4iv 3.5766 (10) N1···N1i 2.525 (2)
O1—Ni1—O1i 82.53 (8) C5—C4—H4A 120.5
O1—Ni1—N1i 174.29 (5) C3—C4—H4A 120.5
O1i—Ni1—N1i 95.89 (7) C4—C5—C6 121.82 (17)
O1—Ni1—N1 95.89 (7) C4—C5—H5A 119.1
O1i—Ni1—N1 174.29 (6) C6—C5—H5A 119.1
N1i—Ni1—N1 86.21 (9) C7—C6—C1 123.15 (17)
C1—O1—Ni1 127.44 (11) C7—C6—C5 118.38 (16)
C3—O2—H1O2 111 (2) C1—C6—C5 118.47 (16)
C7—N1—C8 121.12 (15) N1—C7—C6 124.97 (17)
C7—N1—Ni1 125.63 (13) N1—C7—H7A 117.5
C8—N1—Ni1 113.24 (12) C6—C7—H7A 117.5
O1—C1—C2 118.13 (16) C8i—C8—C9 119.92 (11)
O1—C1—C6 122.74 (16) C8i—C8—N1 113.20 (9)
C2—C1—C6 119.12 (17) C9—C8—N1 126.87 (17)
C3—C2—C1 120.89 (17) C10—C9—C8 119.37 (18)
C3—C2—H2A 119.6 C10—C9—H9A 120.3
C1—C2—H2A 119.6 C8—C9—H9A 120.3
O2—C3—C2 122.42 (17) C9—C10—C10i 120.43 (11)
O2—C3—C4 117.00 (16) C9—C10—H10A 119.8
C2—C3—C4 120.59 (17) C10i—C10—H10A 119.8
C5—C4—C3 119.06 (17) H1W1—O1W—H2W1 114.3
O1i—Ni1—O1—C1 −176.47 (18) O1—C1—C6—C5 178.70 (17)
N1i—Ni1—N1—C7 −176.59 (19) C2—C1—C6—C5 −1.7 (3)
O1—Ni1—N1—C8 177.60 (12) C4—C5—C6—C7 −177.71 (18)
N1i—Ni1—N1—C8 2.93 (9) C4—C5—C6—C1 2.4 (3)
Ni1—O1—C1—C2 −176.01 (12) C8—N1—C7—C6 −175.09 (17)
Ni1—O1—C1—C6 3.6 (3) Ni1—N1—C7—C6 4.4 (3)
O1—C1—C2—C3 179.49 (17) C1—C6—C7—N1 −3.0 (3)
C6—C1—C2—C3 −0.1 (3) C5—C6—C7—N1 177.10 (18)
C1—C2—C3—O2 −178.73 (16) C7—N1—C8—C8i 171.2 (2)
C1—C2—C3—C4 1.4 (3) Ni1—N1—C8—C8i −8.3 (3)
O2—C3—C4—C5 179.35 (17) C7—N1—C8—C9 −7.6 (3)
C2—C3—C4—C5 −0.8 (3) Ni1—N1—C8—C9 172.86 (16)
C3—C4—C5—C6 −1.1 (3) C8i—C8—C9—C10 −5.1 (3)
O1—C1—C6—C7 −1.2 (3) N1—C8—C9—C10 173.65 (18)
C2—C1—C6—C7 178.37 (17) C8—C9—C10—C10i −1.6 (3)

Symmetry codes: (i) −x, y, −z+3/2; (ii) −x+1/2, −y+1/2, −z+2; (iii) x+1/2, −y+1/2, z−1/2; (iv) x−1/2, −y+1/2, z−3/2; (v) −x, y, −z+5/2.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
O1W—H1W1···O1 0.88 2.40 3.0733 (18) 133
O1W—H1W1···O1i 0.88 1.97 2.8072 (19) 160
O1W—H2W1···O2vi 0.83 2.17 2.9985 (19) 173
C9—H9A···O2vii 0.93 2.60 3.394 (2) 144

Symmetry codes: (i) −x, y, −z+3/2; (vi) x, y, z−1; (vii) −x+1/2, y−1/2, −z+5/2.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: PK2114).

References

  1. Allen, F. H., Kennard, O., Watson, D. G., Brammer, L., Orpen, A. G. & Taylor, R. (1987). J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, pp. S1–19.
  2. Bernstein, J., Davis, R. E., Shimoni, L. & Chang, N.-L. (1995). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.34, 1555–1573.
  3. Blower, P. J. (1998). Transition Met. Chem.23, 109–112.
  4. Bruker (2005). APEX2, SAINT and SADABS Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  5. Clark, G. R., Hall, D. & Waters, T. N. (1968). J. Chem. Soc.A, pp. 223–226.
  6. Clark, G. R., Hall, D. & Waters, T. N. (1969). J. Chem. Soc.A, pp. 823–829.
  7. Clark, G. R., Hall, D. & Waters, T. N. (1970). J. Chem. Soc.A, pp. 396–399.
  8. Elmali, A., Elerman, Y. & Svoboda, I. (2000). Acta Cryst. C56, 423–424. [DOI] [PubMed]
  9. Fun, H.-K. & Kia, R. (2008a). Acta Cryst. E64, m1081–m1082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  10. Fun, H.-K. & Kia, R. (2008b). Acta Cryst. E64, m1116–m1117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  11. Granovski, A. D., Nivorozhkin, A. L. & Minkin, V. I. (1993). Coord. Chem. Rev.126, 1–69.
  12. Hodgson, D. J. (1975). Prog. Inorg. Chem.19, 173–202.
  13. Li, C. H. & Chang, T. C. (1991). Eur. Polym. J.27, 35–39.
  14. Shahrokhian, S., Amini, M. K., Kia, R. & Tangestaninejad, S. (2000). Anal. Chem.72, 956–962. [DOI] [PubMed]
  15. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  16. Spek, A. L. (2003). J. Appl. Cryst.36, 7–13.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808026093/pk2114sup1.cif

e-64-m1181-sup1.cif (17.3KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808026093/pk2114Isup2.hkl

e-64-m1181-Isup2.hkl (175KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES