Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2008 Mar 5;64(Pt 4):o660. doi: 10.1107/S1600536807068456

9,10-Dimethyl-9,10-per­oxy-9,10-dihydro­anthracene

Yun-Wu Wang a,*
PMCID: PMC2961065  PMID: 21202057

Abstract

The structure of the title compound, C16H14O2, contains one half-mol­ecule in the asymmetric unit and the mol­ecule is located on a mirror plane. The dihedral angle between the two benzene ring planes is 53.07 (6)°. The crystal structure involves intermolecular C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds.

Related literature

For related literature, see: Burrows et al. (1999); Gable et al. (1996); Karolak-Wojciechowska et al. (1998); Larson (1970); Price (1946); Simpson et al. (2004). graphic file with name e-64-0o660-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • C16H14O2

  • M r = 238.29

  • Orthorhombic, Inline graphic

  • a = 12.9873 (7) Å

  • b = 11.0810 (8) Å

  • c = 8.8368 (8) Å

  • V = 1271.72 (16) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.08 mm−1

  • T = 296 (1) K

  • 0.40 × 0.35 × 0.30 mm

Data collection

  • Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995) T min = 0.958, T max = 0.976

  • 5690 measured reflections

  • 812 independent reflections

  • 585 reflections with F 2 > 2σ(F 2)

  • R int = 0.083

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.042

  • wR(F 2) = 0.107

  • S = 1.00

  • 699 reflections

  • 94 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.23 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.19 e Å−3

Data collection: PROCESS-AUTO (Rigaku, 1998); cell refinement: PROCESS-AUTO; data reduction: CrystalStructure (Rigaku/MSC, 2004); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: CRYSTALS (Betteridge et al., 2003); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: CrystalStructure.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536807068456/ww2092sup1.cif

e-64-0o660-sup1.cif (14.6KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536807068456/ww2092Isup2.hkl

e-64-0o660-Isup2.hkl (38.4KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C4—H4⋯O2i 0.93 2.64 3.526 (2) 159

Symmetry code: (i) Inline graphic.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

The Friedel–Crafts reaction of an alkyl halide with an aromatic hydrocarbon in the presence of aluminium chloride yields a substituted phenyl compound (Price, 1946). The reaction does not, however, stop at the stage of mono-substitution, an unpredictable compound was reported and determined by X-ray crystal structure analysis. The molecule of the title compound lie on a crystallographic mirror plane, which pass through atoms C1/O1/O2/C8/C9/C10 (Fig. 1). The geometrical parameters for (1) are similar to those of related 9,10-bridged anthracene derivatives (Simpson et al., 2004; Gable et al., 1996; Burrows et al., 1999). Atoms C1, C8 are almost coplanar with the benzene ring plane, and the deviating distance from the benzene ring are 0.0074 Å, -0.066 Å respectively. The dihedral angle between the plane of bridge atoms C1—O1—O2—C8 and the benzene ring plane is 63.45 (5)°. The benzene ring plane and its symmetry-related one form the dihedral angle of 53.07 (6)°, which is smaller than that of 9,10-bridged anthrancene systems, e.g. the corresponding dihedral angle in 11,12-bis(N,N-dimethyl-aminomethyl)-9,10-dihydro-9,10-ethanoanthrancene (Karolak-Wojciechowska et al., 1998) is 58.8 (2)°. The three six-membered rings of the bicycle core of (1) [C1—C2—C7—C8—C7i—C2i, C1—C2—C7—C8—O2—O1, C1—C2i—C7i—C8—O2—O1, symmetric code (i): 1 - x,y,z] are all forced into boat forms. Intermolecular weak interactions, C4—H4···O2ii [symmetric code (ii): 1/2 + x, 1/2 - y, -1/2 + z] and C6—H6···C4iii [symmctric code (iii): x, 1 - y, 1/2 + z], link the molecules into circles (Fig. 2). The bridged O2 atom attached to H4 atom of neighbouring benzene ring may result in the longer distance O2—C8, compared with the bond length C1—O1 (Table 1).

Experimental

Ethyl 2-bromo-2-methylpropionate (3.84 g, 20 mmol) was added to a 50 ml flask equipped with a reflux condenser and large magnetic stirrer. Anhydrous benzene (20 ml) was added to the flask, followed by fresh anhydrous AlCl3 (9.00 g, 67.5 mmol) in small portions. The solution was then slowly heated to the reflux temperature and at this time the exit of the reflux condenser was connected to a flowing-water HBr trap. The mixture was heated a total of 24 h without interruption. The reaction mixture was then cooled to 278k. and treated with 20 ml of 50/50 (by volume) conc. HCl/H2O to decompose the catalyst complex. The benzene layer was then separated, washed once with ice-cold H2O (12 ml) and twice with dilute aqueous sodium hydroxide. The organic phase was evaporate. After 6 days, a single-crystal suitable for X-ray analysis was obtained by recrystallization from ethanol.

Refinement

All H atoms were placed in calculated positions with C—H = 0.93–0.96 Å and included in the refinement in riding model, with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(carrier atom). In the absence of anomalous scatterers, no attempt was made to establish the absolute configuration of the title compound.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

A view of (1). Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at 30% probability level and H atoms are shown as small circles of arbitary radii. Symmetry code (i): 1 - x, y, z

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Packing arrangement for (1).

Crystal data

C16H14O2 F000 = 504.00
Mr = 238.29 Dx = 1.244 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, Cmc21 Mo Kα radiation λ = 0.71069 Å
Hall symbol: C 2c -2 Cell parameters from 2234 reflections
a = 12.9873 (7) Å θ = 2.4–27.3º
b = 11.0810 (8) Å µ = 0.08 mm1
c = 8.8368 (8) Å T = 296 (1) K
V = 1271.72 (16) Å3 Chunk, yellow
Z = 4 0.40 × 0.35 × 0.30 mm

Data collection

Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID diffractometer 585 reflections with F2 > 2σ(F2)
Detector resolution: 10.00 pixels mm-1 Rint = 0.083
ω scans θmax = 27.5º
Absorption correction: multi-scan(ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995) h = −16→16
Tmin = 0.958, Tmax = 0.976 k = −14→12
5690 measured reflections l = −11→11
812 independent reflections

Refinement

Refinement on F2   w = 1/[0.0011Fo2 + σ(Fo2)]/(4Fo2)
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.042 (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
wR(F2) = 0.107 Δρmax = 0.23 e Å3
S = 1.00 Δρmin = −0.19 e Å3
699 reflections Extinction correction: (Larson, 1970)
94 parameters Extinction coefficient: 132 (34)
H-atom parameters constrained

Special details

Refinement. Refinement using all reflections. The weighted R-factor (wR) and goodness of fit (S) are based on F2. R-factor (gt) are based on F. The threshold expression of F2 > 2.0σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factor (gt).Data collection(812 indenpent reflections but 699 in refinement): The author of the software, Dr Lee Daniels (ldaniels@RigakuMSC.com) explain this problem (see following). The number of reflections used to refine the cell is taken from the diffractometer program, which uses all available reflections measured in different scans. Even though some reflections are used more than once, they measured at different psi angles and therefore represent independent observations for determination of the cell dimensions.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
O1 0.5000 0.1212 (2) 0.7053 (3) 0.0584 (7)
O2 0.5000 0.1937 (2) 0.8453 (2) 0.0547 (6)
C1 0.5000 0.1992 (2) 0.5707 (4) 0.0488 (9)
C2 0.59500 (13) 0.27732 (18) 0.5847 (2) 0.0466 (6)
C3 0.67877 (17) 0.2829 (2) 0.4883 (3) 0.0631 (8)
C4 0.76037 (19) 0.3580 (2) 0.5212 (3) 0.0750 (10)
C5 0.75816 (19) 0.4289 (3) 0.6492 (3) 0.0769 (9)
C6 0.67600 (18) 0.4228 (2) 0.7475 (3) 0.0655 (8)
C7 0.59468 (14) 0.3466 (2) 0.7153 (2) 0.0482 (5)
C8 0.5000 0.3253 (3) 0.8122 (4) 0.0502 (9)
C9 0.500000 (10) 0.1104 (4) 0.4404 (5) 0.0734 (12)
C10 0.500000 (10) 0.3808 (4) 0.9660 (5) 0.0786 (13)
H3 0.6800 0.2359 0.4011 0.076*
H4 0.8170 0.3608 0.4569 0.090*
H5 0.8125 0.4811 0.6693 0.092*
H6 0.6753 0.4696 0.8349 0.079*
H101 0.5603 0.3555 1.0201 0.094*
H102 0.5000 0.4671 0.9567 0.094*
H901 0.5604 0.0606 0.4462 0.088*
H902 0.5000 0.1538 0.3464 0.088*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
O1 0.0637 (13) 0.0364 (11) 0.0750 (17) 0.0000 0.0000 0.0017 (13)
O2 0.0565 (13) 0.0537 (13) 0.0538 (15) 0.0000 0.0000 0.0087 (11)
C1 0.0523 (17) 0.0373 (15) 0.057 (2) 0.0000 0.0000 −0.0067 (16)
C2 0.0403 (12) 0.0385 (10) 0.0608 (15) 0.0054 (8) 0.0021 (10) 0.0028 (10)
C3 0.0594 (14) 0.0578 (15) 0.072 (2) 0.0127 (11) 0.0150 (14) 0.0089 (14)
C4 0.0450 (13) 0.081 (2) 0.099 (2) 0.0072 (13) 0.0146 (15) 0.032 (2)
C5 0.0440 (13) 0.0784 (19) 0.108 (2) −0.0167 (13) −0.0131 (16) 0.037 (2)
C6 0.0569 (14) 0.0614 (15) 0.078 (2) −0.0120 (12) −0.0224 (14) 0.0061 (14)
C7 0.0400 (10) 0.0440 (10) 0.0606 (14) 0.0016 (8) −0.0061 (10) 0.0019 (12)
C8 0.0492 (16) 0.0492 (18) 0.052 (2) 0.0000 0.0000 −0.0027 (15)
C9 0.089 (2) 0.054 (2) 0.077 (2) 0.0000 0.0000 −0.019 (2)
C10 0.089 (2) 0.089 (2) 0.058 (2) 0.0000 0.0000 −0.017 (2)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

O1—O2 1.475 (3) C7—C8 1.517 (3)
O1—C1 1.470 (4) C8—C10 1.492 (6)
O2—C8 1.487 (4) C3—H3 0.930
C1—C2 1.512 (2) C4—H4 0.930
C1—C2i 1.512 (2) C5—H5 0.930
C1—C9 1.514 (5) C6—H6 0.930
C2—C3 1.383 (3) C9—H901 0.960
C2—C7 1.386 (3) C9—H901i 0.960
C3—C4 1.378 (3) C9—H902 0.960
C4—C5 1.377 (4) C10—H101 0.960
C5—C6 1.378 (3) C10—H101i 0.960
C6—C7 1.382 (3) C10—H102 0.960
O2—O1—C1 111.0 (2) C7—C8—C10 116.76 (19)
O1—O2—C8 111.6 (2) C7i—C8—C10 116.75 (19)
O1—C1—C2 105.68 (18) C2—C3—H3 119.9
O1—C1—C2i 105.68 (18) C4—C3—H3 119.9
O1—C1—C9 103.5 (2) C3—C4—H4 119.9
C2—C1—C2i 109.3 (2) C5—C4—H4 119.9
C2—C1—C9 115.72 (18) C4—C5—H5 119.8
C2i—C1—C9 115.72 (18) C6—C5—H5 119.8
C1—C2—C3 128.1 (2) C5—C6—H6 120.3
C1—C2—C7 112.5 (2) C7—C6—H6 120.3
C3—C2—C7 119.37 (19) C1—C9—H901 109.5
C2—C3—C4 120.1 (2) C1—C9—H901i 109.5
C3—C4—C5 120.1 (2) C1—C9—H902 109.5
C4—C5—C6 120.4 (2) H901—C9—H901i 109.5
C5—C6—C7 119.4 (2) H901—C9—H902 109.5
C2—C7—C6 120.5 (2) H901i—C9—H902 109.5
C2—C7—C8 112.7 (2) C8—C10—H101 109.5
C6—C7—C8 126.7 (2) C8—C10—H101i 109.5
O2—C8—C7 105.30 (19) C8—C10—H102 109.5
O2—C8—C7i 105.30 (19) H101—C10—H101i 109.4
O2—C8—C10 103.0 (3) H101—C10—H102 109.5
C7—C8—C7i 108.3 (2) H101i—C10—H102 109.5
O2—O1—C1—C2 57.93 (16) C1—C2—C7—C6 179.4 (2)
O2—O1—C1—C2i −57.93 (16) C1—C2—C7—C8 0.8 (2)
O1—O2—C8—C7 −57.16 (18) C3—C2—C7—C6 1.5 (3)
O1—O2—C8—C7i 57.16 (18) C3—C2—C7—C8 −177.1 (2)
O1—C1—C2—C3 118.2 (2) C7—C2—C3—C4 −0.8 (3)
O1—C1—C2—C7 −59.5 (2) C2—C3—C4—C5 −0.9 (4)
O1—C1—C2i—C3i −118.2 (2) C3—C4—C5—C6 1.9 (4)
O1—C1—C2i—C7i 59.5 (2) C4—C5—C6—C7 −1.2 (4)
C2—C1—C2i—C3i 128.5 (2) C5—C6—C7—C2 −0.5 (3)
C2—C1—C2i—C7i −53.8 (3) C5—C6—C7—C8 177.9 (2)
C2i—C1—C2—C3 −128.5 (2) C2—C7—C8—O2 57.3 (2)
C2i—C1—C2—C7 53.8 (3) C2—C7—C8—C10 170.8 (2)
C9—C1—C2—C3 4.3 (4) C2—C7—C8—C7i −55.0 (3)
C9—C1—C2—C7 −173.3 (2) C6—C7—C8—O2 −121.2 (2)
C9—C1—C2i—C3i −4.3 (4) C6—C7—C8—C10 −7.7 (4)
C9—C1—C2i—C7i 173.3 (2) C6—C7—C8—C7i 126.5 (2)
C1—C2—C3—C4 −178.4 (2)

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, y, z.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
C4—H4···O2ii 0.93 2.64 3.526 (2) 159

Symmetry codes: (ii) x+1/2, −y+1/2, z−1/2.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: WW2092).

References

  1. Betteridge, P. W., Carruthers, J. R., Cooper, R. I., Prout, K. & Watkin, D. J. (2003). J. Appl. Cryst.36, 1487.
  2. Burrows, L., Masnovi, J. & Baker, R. J. (1999). Acta Cryst. C55, 236–239.
  3. Farrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst.30, 565.
  4. Gable, R. W., Qureshi, A. & Schiesser, C. H. (1996). Acta Cryst. C52, 674–675.
  5. Higashi, T. (1995). ABSCOR Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
  6. Karolak-Wojciechowska, J., Trzezwinska, H. B., Alibert-Franco, S., Santelli-Rouvier, C. & Barbe, J. (1998). J. Chem. Crystallogr.28, 905–911.
  7. Larson, A. C. (1970). Crystallographic Computing, edited by F. R. Ahmed, S. R. Hall & C. P. Huber, pp. 291–294. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.
  8. Price, C. C. (1946). The Alkylation of Aromatic Compounds by the Friedel–Crafts Method, Vol. 3, Organic Reactions III, edited by R. Adams, pp. 1–82. New York: John Wiley Press.
  9. Rigaku (1998). PROCESS-AUTO Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
  10. Rigaku/MSC (2004). CrystalStructure Version 3.60. Rigaku/MSC, The Woodlands, Texas, USA.
  11. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  12. Simpson, M., Storey, J. M. D. & Harrison, W. T. A. (2004). Acta Cryst. E60, o1081–o1083.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536807068456/ww2092sup1.cif

e-64-0o660-sup1.cif (14.6KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536807068456/ww2092Isup2.hkl

e-64-0o660-Isup2.hkl (38.4KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES