Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2008 Apr 26;64(Pt 5):o910. doi: 10.1107/S160053680801129X

4,4′-Diiodo-3,3′-dimethoxy­biphen­yl

Qamar Ali a, Muhammad Raza Shah a,*, Donald VanDerveer b
PMCID: PMC2961291  PMID: 21202392

Abstract

The mol­ecules of the title compound, C14H12I2O2, lie on inversion centers and are linked by I⋯O inter­actions with inter­molecular distances of 3.324 (3) Å. The aromatic rings display no significant inter­calation or stacking inter­actions.

Related literature

For related literature see: Sakai & Matile (2003); Sakai et al. (1997); Anelli et al. (2001); Baumeister et al. (2001); Fidzinski et al. (2003); Mullen & Wegner (1998); Schwab & Levin (1999); Sisson et al. (2006).graphic file with name e-64-0o910-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • C14H12I2O2

  • M r = 466.04

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 6.8616 (14) Å

  • b = 7.7386 (15) Å

  • c = 13.435 (3) Å

  • β = 102.43 (3)°

  • V = 696.7 (2) Å3

  • Z = 2

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 4.50 mm−1

  • T = 153 (2) K

  • 0.36 × 0.26 × 0.24 mm

Data collection

  • Rigaku Mercury CCD diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (REQAB; Jacobson, 1998) T min = 0.241, T max = 0.337

  • 5295 measured reflections

  • 1417 independent reflections

  • 1381 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.039

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.024

  • wR(F 2) = 0.062

  • S = 1.13

  • 1417 reflections

  • 84 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 1.08 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.90 e Å−3

Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku/MSC, 2006); cell refinement: CrystalClear; data reduction: REQAB (Jacobson, 1998) and CrystalClear; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S160053680801129X/pv2077sup1.cif

e-64-0o910-sup1.cif (12.7KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053680801129X/pv2077Isup2.hkl

e-64-0o910-Isup2.hkl (70KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan for financial support.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

Over the last 25 years, much attention has been focused on the synthesis of artificial ion channels due to their potential applications in biomedical and material sciences (Schwab & Levin, 1999; Mullen & Wegner, 1998; Fidzinski et al., 2003). The title compound has been used as a precursor for the synthesis of oligo(p-phenylene)s (Baumeister et al., 2001) and as a source of hydrophobicity and rigidity (Sakai et al., 1997; Sakai & Matile, 2003) in artificial ion channels. When a macrocycles like porphyrin is attached to the oligo(p-phenylene)s, the π-π stacking of porphyrin and the antiperiplanar arrangement of the oligo(p-phenylene)s should result in cylindrical self-assembly process and ultimately lead to the formation of functionalized pores (Sisson et al., 2006). Furthermore, iodinated biphenyl has a bright prospect as X-ray contrast media (Anelli et al., 2001).

In this paper, we report the sysnthesis and crystal structure of the title compound, (I). The molecules of (I) lie on crystallographic inversion centers. The I1—O1 intermolecular distance is 3.324 (3) Å which is significantly shorter than 3.50 Å, the sum of the van der Waals radii for I and O, supporting the idea that oxygen atom of methoxy disturbs the electronic cloud surrounding the iodide, hence creating polarization over iodide and subsequently causes reduction in the I1—O1 intermolecular distance. The crystal structures of three hexaiododerivatives of biphenyl have been reported (Anelli et al., (2001).

Experimental

Fast Blue B salt (o-dianisidine bisdiazotated zinc double salt, 10.00 g, 21 mmol), was added to a solution of KI (28 g, 0.17 mmol) in water (200 ml). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 14 h. After dilution with dichloromethane, the crude reaction mixture was concentrated in vacuo. Purification of the crude product on silica gel (dichloromethane:hexane 1:4) followed by evaporation of the solvent under in vacuo gave the pure desired product as a pale yellow solid in 70% yield. Single crystals suitable for X-ray crystallography were obtained by slow evaporation of a solution of pale yellow solid in ethanol at room temperature.

Refinement

All H atoms were geometrically positioned and were allowed to ride on the corresponding C-atoms with C—H = 0.96 Å and Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(C) of the attached C atom for methyl H atoms and 1.2Ueq(C) for other H atoms. The highest peak in the final difference Fourier map corresponding to a residual electron density of 1.08 e/Å3 was located at 1.2 Å from H5 and was deemed meaningless.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

A thermal ellipsoid plot of the title compound drawn at 50% probability level. The symmetry related atoms have been identified by the letter A in atomic labels.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Packing diagram of the structure viewed down the b axis. Hydrogen bonds have been indicated with dashed lines.

Crystal data

C14H12I2O2 F(000) = 436
Mr = 466.04 Dx = 2.222 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/n Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2yn Cell parameters from 2340 reflections
a = 6.8616 (14) Å θ = 3.0–26.4°
b = 7.7386 (15) Å µ = 4.51 mm1
c = 13.435 (3) Å T = 153 K
β = 102.43 (3)° Chip, colorless
V = 696.7 (2) Å3 0.36 × 0.26 × 0.24 mm
Z = 2

Data collection

Rigaku Mercury CCD diffractometer 1417 independent reflections
Radiation source: Sealed Tube 1381 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite Monochromator Rint = 0.039
Detector resolution: 14.6306 pixels mm-1 θmax = 26.4°, θmin = 3.1°
ω scans h = −8→8
Absorption correction: multi-scan (REQAB; Jacobson, 1998) k = −9→9
Tmin = 0.241, Tmax = 0.337 l = −16→11
5295 measured reflections

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.024 H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.062 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0318P)2 + 1.081P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.13 (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1417 reflections Δρmax = 1.08 e Å3
84 parameters Δρmin = −0.90 e Å3
0 restraints Extinction correction: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods Extinction coefficient: 0.0437 (19)

Special details

Experimental. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R– factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
I1 0.28040 (3) 0.14667 (2) 0.340534 (14) 0.01974 (14)
O1 0.5702 (3) 0.3479 (3) 0.22987 (17) 0.0195 (5)
C1 0.5402 (4) 0.2888 (3) 0.3985 (2) 0.0152 (5)
C2 0.6482 (4) 0.3641 (3) 0.3325 (2) 0.0129 (6)
C3 0.8273 (4) 0.4479 (4) 0.3731 (2) 0.0151 (5)
H3 0.9008 0.5005 0.3278 0.018*
C4 0.9026 (4) 0.4569 (3) 0.4787 (2) 0.0139 (5)
C5 0.7896 (4) 0.3821 (4) 0.5427 (2) 0.0183 (6)
H5 0.8366 0.3884 0.6153 0.022*
C6 0.6107 (4) 0.2990 (4) 0.5026 (2) 0.0203 (6)
H6 0.5353 0.2483 0.5475 0.024*
C7 0.6900 (5) 0.4047 (5) 0.1613 (2) 0.0230 (7)
H7A 0.7072 0.5277 0.1668 0.035*
H7B 0.6251 0.3752 0.0927 0.035*
H7C 0.8180 0.3493 0.1783 0.035*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
I1 0.01475 (17) 0.02317 (18) 0.02110 (17) −0.00579 (6) 0.00339 (9) −0.00124 (6)
O1 0.0194 (10) 0.0253 (12) 0.0136 (10) −0.0088 (8) 0.0029 (8) −0.0017 (7)
C1 0.0090 (11) 0.0127 (12) 0.0230 (13) −0.0005 (10) 0.0019 (10) −0.0010 (10)
C2 0.0140 (13) 0.0108 (13) 0.0137 (14) 0.0005 (9) 0.0024 (10) −0.0009 (9)
C3 0.0156 (12) 0.0141 (12) 0.0161 (13) −0.0002 (10) 0.0042 (10) 0.0009 (10)
C4 0.0119 (12) 0.0111 (11) 0.0180 (13) 0.0021 (10) 0.0019 (10) 0.0018 (10)
C5 0.0143 (13) 0.0267 (14) 0.0121 (13) −0.0008 (12) −0.0014 (10) 0.0032 (11)
C6 0.0148 (13) 0.0258 (15) 0.0200 (14) 0.0004 (12) 0.0028 (10) 0.0021 (12)
C7 0.0239 (14) 0.0306 (17) 0.0145 (14) −0.0100 (14) 0.0038 (11) −0.0008 (12)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

I1—C1 2.097 (3) C4—C5 1.401 (4)
O1—C2 1.373 (4) C4—C4i 1.493 (5)
O1—C7 1.429 (4) C5—C6 1.388 (4)
C1—C6 1.380 (4) C5—H5 0.9600
C1—C2 1.399 (4) C6—H6 0.9600
C2—C3 1.392 (4) C7—H7A 0.9599
C3—C4 1.404 (4) C7—H7B 0.9599
C3—H3 0.9600 C7—H7C 0.9599
C2—O1—C7 117.8 (2) C6—C5—C4 120.8 (3)
C6—C1—C2 120.0 (3) C6—C5—H5 119.6
C6—C1—I1 119.4 (2) C4—C5—H5 119.6
C2—C1—I1 120.5 (2) C1—C6—C5 120.5 (3)
O1—C2—C3 123.8 (3) C1—C6—H6 119.7
O1—C2—C1 117.0 (2) C5—C6—H6 119.7
C3—C2—C1 119.3 (3) O1—C7—H7A 109.5
C2—C3—C4 121.4 (3) O1—C7—H7B 109.5
C2—C3—H3 119.3 H7A—C7—H7B 109.5
C4—C3—H3 119.3 O1—C7—H7C 109.5
C5—C4—C3 117.9 (2) H7A—C7—H7C 109.5
C5—C4—C4i 121.2 (3) H7B—C7—H7C 109.5
C3—C4—C4i 120.9 (3)

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+2, −y+1, −z+1.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: PV2077).

References

  1. Anelli, P. L., Brocchetta, M., Maffezzoni, C., Paoli, P., Rossi, P., Ugger, F. & Visigalli, M. (2001). J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1, pp. 1175–1181.
  2. Baumeister, B., Sakai, N. & Matile, S. (2001). Org. Lett.3, 4229–4232. [DOI] [PubMed]
  3. Fidzinski, A., Knoll, R., Rosenthal, A., Schrey, A., Vescovi, U., Koert, M., Weiderholt, M. & Straub, O. (2003). Chem. Biol.10, 35–43. [DOI] [PubMed]
  4. Jacobson, R. (1998). REQAB Molecular Structure Corporation, The Woodlands, Texas, USA.
  5. Mullen, K. & Wegner, G. (1998). Electronic Materials: The Oligomer Approach, pp. 210–225. Weinheim: Wiley–VCH.
  6. Rigaku/MSC (2006). CrystalClear MSC, The Woodlands, Texas, USA, and Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
  7. Sakai, N., Brennan, K. C., Weiss, L. A. & Matile, S. (1997). J. Am. Chem. Soc.119, 8726–8727.
  8. Sakai, N. & Matile, S. (2003). Chem. Commun. pp. 2514–2523. [DOI] [PubMed]
  9. Schwab, P. F. H. & Levin, M. D. (1999). Chem. Rev.99, 1863–1934. [DOI] [PubMed]
  10. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  11. Sisson, A. L., Shah, M. R., Bhosale, S. & Matile, S. (2006). Chem. Soc. Rev.35, 1269–1286. [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S160053680801129X/pv2077sup1.cif

e-64-0o910-sup1.cif (12.7KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053680801129X/pv2077Isup2.hkl

e-64-0o910-Isup2.hkl (70KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES