Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2008 May 17;64(Pt 6):o1100. doi: 10.1107/S1600536808014414

Bis(4-pyridylmeth­yl) hexa­nedioate

Jin-Hui Yang a, Jian-Min Zhang a, Yan-Xue Chen b,*, Jian-Zhi Diao a, Zheng Peng a
PMCID: PMC2961555  PMID: 21202614

Abstract

The asymmetric unit of the title compound, C18H20N2O4, contains one half-mol­ecule. The mol­ecule lies on an inversion centre and is roughly planar, the chains between the two pyridine rings being only slightly twisted, with torsion angles ranging from 170.9 (1) to 177.2 (1)°. Weak C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds result in the formation of a three-dimensional network.

Related literature

For related literature, see: Banfi et al. (2002); Magden & Basel (1984).graphic file with name e-64-o1100-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • C18H20N2O4

  • M r = 328.36

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 9.1489 (18) Å

  • b = 10.164 (2) Å

  • c = 8.9206 (18) Å

  • β = 102.11 (3)°

  • V = 811.1 (3) Å3

  • Z = 2

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.10 mm−1

  • T = 113 (2) K

  • 0.12 × 0.10 × 0.08 mm

Data collection

  • Rigaku Saturn diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005) T min = 0.979, T max = 0.988

  • 9823 measured reflections

  • 1918 independent reflections

  • 1288 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.060

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.041

  • wR(F 2) = 0.106

  • S = 0.98

  • 1918 reflections

  • 109 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.34 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.24 e Å−3

Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005); cell refinement: CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalClear; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEPIII (Burnett & Johnson, 1996) and ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808014414/dn2349sup1.cif

e-64-o1100-sup1.cif (14.6KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808014414/dn2349Isup2.hkl

e-64-o1100-Isup2.hkl (94.4KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C6—H6B⋯O2i 0.97 2.56 3.3333 (17) 137

Symmetry code: (i) Inline graphic.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

Hexanedioic acid dipyridin-4-ylmethyl ester is a very important intermediate in the synthesis of cephalosporins (Magden & Basel, 1984). Also, it can be used as a ligand designed for the self-assembly of coordination frameworks and architectures (Banfi et al., 2002);

The title compound is arranged around an inversion centre located in the middle of the C9-C9i bond [symmetry code:(i) 1-x, 1-y, 1-z ] (Fig. 1). The molecule is roughly planar, the chains between the two pyridyl rings being only slightly twisted with torsion angles ranging from 170.9 (1) to 177.2 (1)° .

Weak intermolecular C—H···O hydrogen bonds (Table 1) result in the formation of a three dimensionnal network

Experimental

4-pyridinemethanol (9.82 g, 0.09 mol) and dimethyl adipate (5.22 g, 0.03 mol) were stirred with 200 ml n-octane at 343 k,then titaniun tetraisopropoxide (0.2 g) was added.The mixture was heated to 399 k, the methanol was distilled off. After stirring at this temperature for 4 h,the reaction finished. The solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The product was purified by chromatography on silica. Crystals of hexanedioic acid dipyridin-4-ylmethyl ester were obtained by slow evaporation of a solution of ethyl acetation at room temperature(m.p. 359 k).

Refinement

H atoms were positioned geometrically and refined as riding on their parent atoms [C—H distances are 0.93 Å (aromatic) and 0.97 Å (methylene) with Uiso(H) = 1.2 Ueq(C)].

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

A view of the molecular structure of (I)with the atoms labelling scheme. Displacement ellopsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level and H atoms are shown as small spheres of arbitrary radii. [Symmetry code: (i) 1-x, 1-y, 1-z ]

Crystal data

C18H20N2O4 F000 = 348
Mr = 328.36 Dx = 1.345 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/c Mo Kα radiation λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc Cell parameters from 2434 reflections
a = 9.1489 (18) Å θ = 2.3–27.9º
b = 10.164 (2) Å µ = 0.10 mm1
c = 8.9206 (18) Å T = 113 (2) K
β = 102.11 (3)º Block, colorless
V = 811.1 (3) Å3 0.12 × 0.10 × 0.08 mm
Z = 2

Data collection

Rigaku Saturn diffractometer 1918 independent reflections
Radiation source: rotating anode 1288 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Monochromator: confocal Rint = 0.060
T = 113(2) K θmax = 27.9º
ω scans θmin = 2.3º
Absorption correction: multi-scan(CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005) h = −12→12
Tmin = 0.979, Tmax = 0.988 k = −13→13
9823 measured reflections l = −11→11

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.041 H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.107   w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0564P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 0.98 (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1918 reflections Δρmax = 0.34 e Å3
109 parameters Δρmin = −0.24 e Å3
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods Extinction correction: none

Special details

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
O1 0.70599 (9) 0.51214 (8) 0.11415 (9) 0.0198 (2)
O2 0.64123 (11) 0.69241 (9) 0.22847 (10) 0.0307 (3)
N1 0.90646 (13) 0.38939 (10) −0.35175 (12) 0.0234 (3)
C1 0.89598 (14) 0.58417 (13) −0.20251 (14) 0.0219 (3)
H1 0.9218 0.6722 −0.1854 0.026*
C2 0.93751 (15) 0.51700 (13) −0.32073 (15) 0.0226 (3)
H2 0.9901 0.5625 −0.3828 0.027*
C3 0.83041 (15) 0.32799 (13) −0.25920 (15) 0.0250 (3)
H3 0.8082 0.2394 −0.2773 0.030*
C4 0.78264 (14) 0.38780 (13) −0.13832 (14) 0.0221 (3)
H4 0.7297 0.3404 −0.0781 0.026*
C5 0.81535 (14) 0.51996 (12) −0.10895 (13) 0.0184 (3)
C6 0.76640 (15) 0.59800 (12) 0.01395 (14) 0.0206 (3)
H6A 0.8509 0.6460 0.0727 0.025*
H6B 0.6910 0.6614 −0.0323 0.025*
C7 0.64740 (13) 0.57452 (13) 0.22139 (13) 0.0188 (3)
C8 0.59372 (14) 0.47965 (12) 0.32611 (14) 0.0200 (3)
H8A 0.6751 0.4212 0.3707 0.024*
H8B 0.5141 0.4264 0.2669 0.024*
C9 0.53658 (14) 0.54786 (11) 0.45402 (14) 0.0196 (3)
H9A 0.6193 0.5912 0.5219 0.023*
H9B 0.4647 0.6148 0.4102 0.023*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
O1 0.0269 (5) 0.0179 (5) 0.0184 (5) 0.0006 (4) 0.0133 (4) 0.0013 (4)
O2 0.0492 (7) 0.0193 (5) 0.0301 (6) −0.0007 (4) 0.0230 (5) −0.0018 (4)
N1 0.0283 (6) 0.0223 (6) 0.0218 (6) 0.0034 (5) 0.0102 (5) −0.0005 (5)
C1 0.0242 (7) 0.0193 (7) 0.0236 (7) 0.0012 (5) 0.0081 (6) 0.0020 (6)
C2 0.0244 (7) 0.0263 (7) 0.0197 (7) 0.0016 (6) 0.0106 (6) 0.0040 (6)
C3 0.0288 (8) 0.0211 (7) 0.0263 (8) −0.0004 (6) 0.0089 (6) −0.0040 (6)
C4 0.0235 (7) 0.0249 (7) 0.0199 (7) −0.0010 (5) 0.0093 (6) 0.0018 (6)
C5 0.0189 (6) 0.0216 (7) 0.0145 (6) 0.0016 (5) 0.0033 (5) 0.0012 (5)
C6 0.0283 (7) 0.0175 (7) 0.0191 (7) −0.0018 (5) 0.0122 (6) 0.0023 (5)
C7 0.0199 (7) 0.0208 (7) 0.0168 (7) 0.0002 (5) 0.0062 (5) −0.0028 (6)
C8 0.0240 (7) 0.0183 (6) 0.0202 (7) −0.0005 (5) 0.0106 (5) 0.0010 (5)
C9 0.0220 (7) 0.0204 (7) 0.0187 (7) −0.0001 (5) 0.0098 (6) 0.0005 (6)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

O1—C7 1.3489 (14) C4—H4 0.9300
O1—C6 1.4398 (14) C5—C6 1.4959 (17)
O2—C7 1.2019 (15) C6—H6A 0.9700
N1—C3 1.3402 (16) C6—H6B 0.9700
N1—C2 1.3441 (16) C7—C8 1.4954 (17)
C1—C2 1.3751 (17) C8—C9 1.5186 (17)
C1—C5 1.3874 (16) C8—H8A 0.9700
C1—H1 0.9300 C8—H8B 0.9700
C2—H2 0.9300 C9—C9i 1.516 (2)
C3—C4 1.3860 (17) C9—H9A 0.9700
C3—H3 0.9300 C9—H9B 0.9700
C4—C5 1.3891 (18)
C7—O1—C6 114.63 (10) C5—C6—H6A 109.6
C3—N1—C2 115.92 (11) O1—C6—H6B 109.6
C2—C1—C5 119.68 (12) C5—C6—H6B 109.6
C2—C1—H1 120.2 H6A—C6—H6B 108.1
C5—C1—H1 120.2 O2—C7—O1 122.40 (11)
N1—C2—C1 123.82 (12) O2—C7—C8 125.79 (11)
N1—C2—H2 118.1 O1—C7—C8 111.80 (11)
C1—C2—H2 118.1 C7—C8—C9 112.64 (10)
N1—C3—C4 124.35 (12) C7—C8—H8A 109.1
N1—C3—H3 117.8 C9—C8—H8A 109.1
C4—C3—H3 117.8 C7—C8—H8B 109.1
C3—C4—C5 118.70 (11) C9—C8—H8B 109.1
C3—C4—H4 120.6 H8A—C8—H8B 107.8
C5—C4—H4 120.6 C9i—C9—C8 111.98 (12)
C1—C5—C4 117.52 (11) C9i—C9—H9A 109.2
C1—C5—C6 118.04 (11) C8—C9—H9A 109.2
C4—C5—C6 124.42 (11) C9i—C9—H9B 109.2
O1—C6—C5 110.27 (10) C8—C9—H9B 109.2
O1—C6—H6A 109.6 H9A—C9—H9B 107.9
C1—C5—C6—O1 −170.85 (11) O1—C7—C8—C9 176.27 (10)
C6—O1—C7—C8 −177.17 (10)

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
C6—H6B···O2ii 0.97 2.56 3.3333 (17) 137

Symmetry codes: (ii) x, −y+3/2, z−1/2.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: DN2349).

References

  1. Banfi, S., Carlucci, L., Caruso, E., Ciani, G. & Proserpio, D. (2002). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 2714–2721.
  2. Burnett, M. N. & Johnson, C. K. (1996). ORTEPIII Report ORNL-6895. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.
  3. Farrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst.30, 565.
  4. Magden, A. & Basel, E. (1984). United States Patent US 4 461 898.
  5. Rigaku (2005). CrystalClear Rigaku/MSC, The Woodlands, Texas, USA.
  6. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808014414/dn2349sup1.cif

e-64-o1100-sup1.cif (14.6KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808014414/dn2349Isup2.hkl

e-64-o1100-Isup2.hkl (94.4KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES