Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2003 Dec;47(12):3967–3969. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.12.3967-3969.2003

In Vitro Activity of Tigecycline against Staphylococcus epidermidis Growing in an Adherent-Cell Biofilm Model

Pornpen Labthavikul 1, Peter J Petersen 1,*, Patricia A Bradford 1
PMCID: PMC296180  PMID: 14638511

Abstract

The activity of tigecycline against Staphylococcus epidermidis growing in an in vitro adherent-cell biofilm model was determined. Tigecycline minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) ranged from 1 to 8 μg/ml for S. epidermidis growing in a biofilm of adherent cells, compared to MBCs of 0.12 to >32 μg/ml for freely growing cells. The killing activity of tigecycline against the adherent bacteria was at least fourfold better than that of vancomycin and daptomycin.


Staphylococcus epidermidis is a leading cause of medical-device-related infections, especially in immunocompromised patients. The treatment of these infections is further complicated by the emergence of multiresistant strains. The ability of S. epidermidis to form biofilms on smooth surfaces is believed to contribute significantly to the pathogenesis of these infections. Biofilms are notoriously difficult to eradicate and are often resistant to systemic antibiotic therapy. Numerous studies have reported S. epidermidis biofilm resistance to many antimicrobial agents in vitro and in vivo (2, 4, 5, 9, 10, 15, 16, 17).

Tigecycline (formerly GAR-936), a 9-glycylamido derivative of minocycline, is currently in phase III clinical trials. Tigecycline is a broad-spectrum antibacterial agent possessing excellent antimicrobial activity against most gram-positive pathogens, including S. epidermidis (1, 7, 13, 14). The goal of this study was to assess the antimicrobial activity of tigecycline against adherent S. epidermidis in an in vitro biofilm model.

(This work was presented in part previously [P. Labthavikul and P. A. Bradford, Abstr. 40th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. 525, 2000].)

Clinical isolates of S. epidermidis were screened for the ability to produce slime by a method described by Christensen et. al (3). The amount of slime production was scored, and the strains were categorized as strong, moderate, or weak slime producers or non-slime producers. The MICs and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) of tigecycline and the other antimicrobial agents against adherent S. epidermidis were determined as described previously (15, 16), with modifications. Bacterial suspensions (100 μl) at a density of 106 CFU/ml were made in phosphate-buffered saline supplemented with 0.25% glucose and were incubated in 96-well plates for 24 h at 37°C, without shaking, to allow the bacteria to attach to the surface. Nonadherent bacteria were removed by gentle washing two times with phosphate-buffered saline with a liquid-handling system (Cetus, Emeryville, Calif.). Serial twofold dilutions (100 μl per well) of antimicrobial agents in Mueller-Hinton broth (MHB II) were added to wells containing adherent cells. The plates were then incubated at 37°C for another 24 h. The MICadh was defined as the lowest concentration of antibiotic at which there was no observable bacterial growth in the wells containing adherent microcolonies. After the MICadhs were determined, the MHB II containing antibiotic was removed and replaced with 100 μl of antibiotic-free MHB II; this was followed by incubation for another 20 to 24 h at 37°C. The MBCadh was defined as the lowest concentration of antibiotic at which there was no bacterial growth following removal of the drug. All experiments with adherent cells were performed in duplicate. The MICs and MBCs of tigecycline and other antimicrobial agents for planktonic (freely growing) S. epidermidis were determined by broth microdilution assay as recommended by the NCCLS (11, 12) simultaneously with the adherent-cell experiments. To assess the possibility that the inoculum in the MIC tests with planktonic bacteria was substantially different from that of the adherent cells, colony counts were performed by plating representative planktonic and resuspended adherent isolates (see Table 2).

TABLE 2.

Inoculum concentration of S. epidermidis

Slime production group CFU/ml
Planktonic bacteria Adherent bacteria recovered from well
Strong producers
    S. epidermidis GC 5744 1.4 × 105 3.9 × 104
    S. epidermidis PT 1031 2.0 × 105 5.6 × 105
Moderate producers
    S. epidermidis GC 5734 1.0 × 105 1.7 × 105
    S. epidermidis GC 5746 3.2 × 105 2.0 × 105
Weak producers
    S. epidermidis GC 2794 6.0 × 105 4.8 × 105
    S. epidermidis GC 5737 1.7 × 105 7.2 × 105
Nonproducers
    S. epidermidis PT 5368 2.0 × 105 8.0 × 103
    S. epidermidis PT 7276 1.0 × 105 1.3 × 104

The MIC, MICadh, MBC, and MBCadh measurements obtained are summarized in Table 1. The MICs of most antibiotics for 90% of the strains tested (MIC90s) were comparable to the MIC90adhs. The MBC90 of the bactericidal antibiotic vancomycin (8 μg/ml) was fourfold lower than that of the bacteriostatic drugs tigecycline and minocycline (32 μg/ml) for freely growing cells. However, tigecycline and minocycline demonstrated more killing of adherent cells than did vancomycin and daptomycin (MBC90adhs, 8, 8, 32, and 32 μg/ml, respectively). The MBCadhs of vancomycin and daptomycin were higher than the MBC for planktonic bacteria by 2 to 3 dilutions. Tigecycline, minocycline, and teicoplanin demonstrated better activity against the biofilm bacteria than did the other comparative agents. The only agent that was slightly more active against adherent S. epidermidis (MBC90adh, 4 μg/ml) was the mannopeptimycin antibiotic AC98-6446, a novel semisynthetic glycopeptide under development at Wyeth (P. Labthavikul, P. J. Petersen, T. Z. Wang, R. G. Dushin, and P. A. Bradford, Abstr. 42nd Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. F355, 2002; R. G. Dushin and T. Z. Wang, Abstr. 42nd Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. F352, 2002). There was no correlation between the amount of slime produced by and the antibiotic susceptibility of strongly, moderately, and poorly slime-producing and non-slime-producing S. epidermidis bacteria. The colony counts from representative inocula used in the MIC tests with planktonic bacteria and bacteria recovered from resuspended adherent cells are shown in Table 2. For most of the strains, there was no significant difference between the inoculum used and the MICs determined with planktonic cells or adherent bacteria recovered from the wells. However, as expected, the colony counts of the two strains that did not produce slime were approximately 1 log lower than those of the adherent bacteria recovered from the wells.

TABLE 1.

In vitro MICs and MBCs of tigecycline and comparative antibiotics against 68 planktonic and adherent S. epidermidis isolates

Antimicrobial agent Planktonic bacteria (μg/ml)
Adherent bacteria (μg/ml)
MIC range MIC50 MIC90 MBC range MBC50 MBC90 MICadh range MIC50adh MIC90adh MBCadh range MBC50adh MBC90adh
Tigecycline 0.06-1 0.5 0.5 0.12->32 4 32 ≤0.015-1 0.25 0.5 1-8 4 8
Minocycline 0.06-1 0.5 1 0.25->32 8 32 ≤0.015-2 0.25 0.5 1-16 4 8
Vancomycin 1-8 2 4 1-16 4 8 ≤0.015-4 2 4 2->32 16 32
AC98-6446 0.06-2 0.25 0.5 0.06-4 0.5 1 0.12-2 1 2 1-8 2 4
Daptomycin 0.5-8 1 2 0.5-64 1 4 0.06-4 1 2 0.5-64 4 32
Teicoplanin 0.12-8 2 8 0.25-16 4 16 0.06-4 1 4 0.5-32 4 8
Gentamicin ≤0.015->32 0.25 >32 0.03->32 32 >32 ≤0.015-32 4 >32 0.12->32 32 >32
Tobramycin 0.06->32 16 >32 0.06->32 32 >32 0.06->32 8 >32 0.12->32 >32 >32
Ciprofloxacin 0.06->32 0.25 32 0.12->32 0.5 >32 0.06->32 0.25 32 0.5->32 2 >32
Oxacillin ≤0.06->128 4 128 0.06->128 8 >128 ≤0.06->128 2 128 0.12->128 16 >128
Cefazolin ≤0.06->128 2 32 ≤0.06->128 2 128 ≤0.06->128 1 16 0.5->128 16 128
Rifampin ≤0.015->8 ≤0.015 >8 ≤0.015->8 0.03 >8 ≤0.015->8 ≤0.015 >8 ≤0.015->8 0.03 >8
SXTa 0.12->128 2 64 4->128 >128 >128 0.12-128 1 64 1->128 >128 >128
a

SXT, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.

Biofilm is an assemblage of bacteria and a polysaccharide matrix (slime) that allows the bacteria to adhere to smooth surfaces and medical devices. The embedded bacteria are less accessible to antibiotics and the human immune system defense mechanism. None of the currently used bactericidal-compound-based technologies is completely effective at preventing microbial colonization of medical catheters (4, 6, 8, 10). In this study, we demonstrated that the bactericidal activities of tigecycline and minocycline against adherent S. epidermidis in a biofilm model were better than their activities against freely growing cells in that the MBC90adhs were lower than the MBC90s. Growth rate differences between adherent and planktonic cells have been indicated as a possible cause of susceptibility differences (2, 9, 10). This growth rate difference may have been a factor contributing to the better activity of tigecycline against adherent cells as well. The ability of tigecycline to inhibit the growth of adherent cells of S. epidermidis indicates that tigecycline is able to diffuse through the biofilm and act normally against its cellular target.

The findings of this in vitro study suggest that tigecycline might be considered for treatment of implant- or catheter-associated infections caused by slime-producing staphylococci. Although this model is lacking many of the components of a true in vivo biofilm, it is a good model with which to determine antibacterial activity against surface-associated bacteria. The relevance of any biofilm susceptibility testing to in vivo efficacy is still lacking. Therefore, further in vivo studies are warranted to confirm the efficacy of tigecycline against staphylococcal biofilm.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Biedenbach, D. J., M. L. Beach, and R. N. Jones. 2001. In vitro antimicrobial activity of GAR-936 tested against antibiotic resistant gram-positive blood stream infection isolates and strains producing extended-spectrum beta-lactamases. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 40:173-177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Brown, M. R., D. G. Allison, and P. Gilbert. 1988. Resistance of bacterial biofilms to antibiotics: a growth-rate related effect? J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 22:777-780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Christensen, G. D., W. A. Simpson, J. J. Younger, L. M. Baddour, F. F. Barrett, D. M. Melton, and E. H. Beachey. 1985. Adherence of coagulase-negative staphylococci to plastic tissue culture plates: a quantitative model for the adherence of staphylococci to medical devices. J. Clin. Microbiol. 22:996-1006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Danese, P. N. 2002. Antibiofilm approaches: prevention of catheter colonization. Chem. Biol. 9:873-880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Drancourt, M., A. Stein, J. N. Argenson, A. Zannier, G. Curvale, and D. Raoult. 1993. Oral rifampin plus ofloxacin for treatment of Staphylococcus-infected orthopedic implants. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 37:1214-1218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Evans, R. C., and C. J. Holmes. 1987. Effect of vancomycin hydrochloride on Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm associated with silicone elastomer. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 31:889-894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gales, A. C., and R. N. Jones. 2000. Antimicrobial activity and spectrum of the new glycylcycline GAR-936 tested against 1,203 recent clinical isolates. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 36:19-36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gilbert, P., P. J. Collier, and M. R. Brown. 1990. Influence of growth rate on susceptibility to antimicrobial agents: biofilms, cell cycle, dormancy, and stringent response. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 34:1865-1868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Holme, C. J., and R. C. Evans. 1989. Resistance of bacterial biofilms to antibiotics. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 24:84-93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lewis, K. 2001. Riddle of biofilm resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:999-1007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.NCCLS. 1999. Methods for determining bactericidal activity of antimicrobial agents, vol. 19. Approved guideline M26-A, NCCLS, Wayne, Pa.
  • 12.NCCLS. 2000. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically, 5th ed., vol. 20. Approved standard M7A5. NCCLS, Wayne, Pa.
  • 13.Petersen, P. J., N. V. Jacobus, W. J. Weiss, P. E. Sum, and R. T. Testa. 1999. In vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities of a novel glycylcycline, the 9-t-butylglycylamido derivative of minocycline (GAR-936). Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:738-744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Petersen, P. J., P. A. Bradford, W. J. Weiss, T. M. Murphy, P. E. Sum, and S. J. Projan. 2002. In vitro and in vivo activities of tigecycline (GAR-936), daptomycin, and comparative antimicrobial agents against glycopeptide-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus and other resistant gram-positive pathogens. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:2595-2601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Souli, M., and H. Giamarellou. 1998. Effect of slime produced by clinical isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci on activities of various antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:939-941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Trafny, E. A. 1998. Susceptibility of adherent organisms from Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from burn wounds to antimicrobial agents. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 10:223-228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yasuda, H., Y. Ajiki, T. Koga, and T. Yokota. 1994. Interaction between clarithromycin and biofilms formed by Staphylococcus epidermidis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38:138-141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES