Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2008 Jul 31;64(Pt 8):m1089. doi: 10.1107/S1600536808023593

Monoclinic polymorph of trans-tetra­aquabis­[(4-pyridylsulfanyl)­acetato-κN]cobalt(II)

Dušan Mikloš a, Jozef Miklovič b, Jan Moncol a,*, Peter Segľa a, Marian Koman a
PMCID: PMC2961997  PMID: 21203067

Abstract

The crystal structure of the title compound, [Co(C7H6NO2S)2(H2O)4], is a polymorph of the structure first reported by Du, Zhao & Wang [(2004). Dalton Trans, pp. 2065–2072]. The asymmetric unit of the title compound contains one half-mol­ecule; the CoII atom lies on an inversion centre in a distorted octa­hedral geometry coordinated by two N atoms of the pyridine rings of the 4-pyridylthio­acetate anions and four O atoms of water mol­ecules. In the crystal structure, inter­molecular O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds link the mol­ecules, forming a three-dimensional network.

Related literature

For related literature, see: Bernstein et al. (1995); Chiang et al. (1993); Du et al. (2004); Du & Li (2006); Kondo et al. (2002); For related structures, see: Fang et al. (2004); Zhang et al. (2004).graphic file with name e-64-m1089-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • [Co(C7H6NO2S)2(H2O)4]

  • M r = 467.37

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 12.173 (1) Å

  • b = 10.479 (1) Å

  • c = 7.523 (2) Å

  • β = 106.78 (3)°

  • V = 918.8 (3) Å3

  • Z = 2

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 1.21 mm−1

  • T = 293 (2) K

  • 0.45 × 0.40 × 0.30 mm

Data collection

  • Siemens P4 diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: ψ scan (XEMP; Siemens, 1994) T min = 0.608, T max = 0.684

  • 3491 measured reflections

  • 2651 independent reflections

  • 2283 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.024

  • 3 standard reflections every 97 reflections intensity decay: 2.0%

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.032

  • wR(F 2) = 0.102

  • S = 1.37

  • 2651 reflections

  • 125 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.41 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.37 e Å−3

Data collection: XSCANS (Siemens, 1994); cell refinement: XSCANS; data reduction: XSCANS; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: enCIFer (Allen et al. 2004).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808023593/ez2135sup1.cif

e-64-m1089-sup1.cif (16.6KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808023593/ez2135Isup2.hkl

e-64-m1089-Isup2.hkl (127.6KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O1W—H1W⋯O1i 0.82 2.05 2.849 (2) 163
O1W—H2W⋯O1ii 0.82 1.95 2.757 (2) 167
O2W—H3W⋯O2ii 0.82 1.91 2.725 (2) 176
O2W—H4W⋯O2iii 0.82 1.95 2.743 (2) 163

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic; (iii) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Scientific Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education of the Slovak Republic and the Slovak Academy of Sciences (grant Nos. 1/4454/07 and 1/0353/08).

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

Several transition metal coordination polymers that contain bridging 4-pyridylthioacetate ligands have been reported recently (Chiang et al., 1993; Du et al., 2004; Du & Li, 2006; Kondo et al., 2002). However, if the 4-pyridylthioacetate anions are coordinated only as terminal ligands there is a possibility that they may also be able to participate in a hydrogen-bonding network. As part of our efforts to investigate metal(II) complexes based on pyridyl-carboxylic acids, we report herein the crystal structure of the title compound, (I).

In the molecular structure of (I) (Fig. 1) the CoII atom lies on an inversion centre and adopts a distorted octahedral coordination geometry with the two N atoms of the pyridine rings of the 4-pyridylthioacetate anions and the four O atoms of the water molecules, where the two symmetry related 4-pyridylthioacetate ligands are in trans positions.

The bond lengths and angles may be compared with the corresponding values in the triclinic polymorph [Co(C7H6NO2S)2(H2O)4] [(II); Du et al., 2004]. In (II), the CoII atom displays similar distorted octahedral coordination geometry, but the angle between the plane through the pyridine rings and that through the four water O atoms of 87.9° is closer to a right angle than the angle of 77.8° in (I). Correspondingly, the distance between the two planes of pyridine rings in (II) is shorter (0.22 Å) than that (0.80 Å) in (I). On the other hand, complex (I) is isostructural with [Cu(C7H6NO2S)2(H2O)4] [(III); Fang et al., (2004)] and [Ni(C7H6NO2S)2(H2O)4] [(IV); Zhang et al., (2004)].

In the crystal structure, intermolecular O–H···O hydrogen bonds (Table 1) link the molecules to form a three-dimensional network. The molecules of (I) lying in layers parallel to the ac plane are linked by O1W–H2W···O1ii; O2W–H3W···O2ii and O2W–H4W···O2iii [Symmetry codes: (ii) -x + 2, -y + 1, -z + 1; (iii) x - 1, y, z] hydrogen bonds (Fig. 2). The hydrogen bonds between two coordinated water molecules O2W and two carboxylate groups through only one carboxylate O atom (O2) of the carboxylate group create R42(8) rings (Bernstein et al., 1995). On the other hand, both O atoms of the two carboxylate groups and two coordinated water molecules create R44(12) rings (Bernstein et al., 1995) in the triclinic polymorph (II). The hydrogen bonds O1W–H1W···O1i [Symmetry code: (i) -x + 2, y - 1/2, -z + 1/2] link the layers to form a 3-D hydrogen bonding network (Fig. 3).

Experimental

Well shaped red crystals of (I) suitable for X-ray analysis were prepared in an H-tube. An aqueous solution of the sodium salt of 4-pyridylthioacetic acid, was placed in the first part of the H-tube, and an aqueous solution of Co(II) sulfate in the second part. Crystals formed after two weeks, whereafter they were separated and dried at room temperature (yield 70%). Anal. Calc. for C14H20CoN2O8S2: C, 35.98; H, 4.31; N, 5.99; S, 13.72; Co, 12.61. Found: C, 35.82; H, 4.41; N, 5.90; S, 13.59; Co, 12.75%. Selected IR data (cm-1): 1570 (versus,br) (νa(COO-) + ν(C=N)), 1376 (versus) (νs(COO-)), 430 (m) (γ(py), pyridine ring out-of-plane bending). Electronic data (cm-1): 21200, 20300, 9200br.

Refinement

All H atoms of C–H (aromatic and methylene) were placed in calculated positions (0.93 and 0.97 Å, respectively); isotropic displaced parameters were fixed [Uiso(H) = 1.2 Uiso(C) of C atoms to which they were attached] using a riding model. The water H atoms were placed in calculated positions (O–H = 0.82 Å); isotropic displacement parameters were fixed [Uiso(H) = 1.5Uiso(O)) of O atoms to which they were attached].

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Molecular structure of the title compound, with atom-numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

A layer of molecules of (I). Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines [Symmetry codes: (ii) -x + 2, -y + 1, -z + 1; (iii) x - 1, y, z].

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Hydrogen bonds between layers of molecules of (I) [Symmetry code: (i) -x + 2, y - 1/2, -z + 1/2].

Crystal data

[Co(C7H6NO2S)2(H2O)4] F000 = 482
Mr = 467.37 Dx = 1.689 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/c Mo Kα radiation λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc Cell parameters from 25 reflections
a = 12.173 (1) Å θ = 1.7–7.9º
b = 10.479 (1) Å µ = 1.21 mm1
c = 7.523 (2) Å T = 293 (2) K
β = 106.78 (3)º Block, pink
V = 918.8 (3) Å3 0.45 × 0.40 × 0.30 mm
Z = 2

Data collection

Siemens P4 diffractometer Rint = 0.024
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube θmax = 30.0º
Monochromator: graphite θmin = 1.8º
T = 293(2) K h = −17→16
2θ/ω scans k = −14→1
Absorption correction: ψ scan(XEMP; Siemens, 1994) l = −1→10
Tmin = 0.608, Tmax = 0.684 3 standard reflections
3491 measured reflections every 97 reflections
2651 independent reflections intensity decay: 2.0%
2283 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
Least-squares matrix: full H-atom parameters constrained
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.032   w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0291P)2 + 0.3487P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.102 (Δ/σ)max = 0.001
S = 1.37 Δρmax = 0.41 e Å3
2651 reflections Δρmin = −0.37 e Å3
125 parameters Extinction correction: SHELXL, Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods Extinction coefficient: 0.073 (6)
Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Co1 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.01988 (13)
S1 1.03489 (4) 0.69603 (5) 0.41990 (8) 0.03026 (16)
O1 1.27843 (14) 0.69566 (16) 0.5784 (2) 0.0379 (4)
O2 1.32163 (14) 0.52026 (19) 0.4432 (3) 0.0413 (4)
O1W 0.56051 (12) 0.31434 (14) 0.0783 (2) 0.0303 (3)
H1W 0.5952 0.2790 0.0135 0.046*
H2W 0.5996 0.3114 0.1871 0.046*
O2W 0.48936 (14) 0.5278 (2) 0.2660 (2) 0.0386 (4)
H3W 0.5470 0.5169 0.3536 0.058*
H4W 0.4300 0.5267 0.2967 0.058*
N1 0.67362 (13) 0.57244 (16) 0.0968 (2) 0.0246 (3)
C1 1.25327 (16) 0.6025 (2) 0.4709 (3) 0.0294 (4)
C2 1.12871 (16) 0.5827 (2) 0.3577 (3) 0.0296 (4)
H2A 1.1051 0.4969 0.3782 0.036*
H2B 1.1223 0.5915 0.2267 0.036*
C3 0.76428 (16) 0.50244 (19) 0.0894 (3) 0.0249 (4)
H3 0.7508 0.4274 0.0205 0.030*
C4 0.87692 (16) 0.5353 (2) 0.1785 (3) 0.0257 (4)
H4 0.9369 0.4834 0.1686 0.031*
C5 0.89935 (15) 0.64675 (19) 0.2828 (3) 0.0228 (4)
C6 0.80572 (17) 0.7236 (2) 0.2835 (3) 0.0305 (4)
H6 0.8171 0.8014 0.3458 0.037*
C7 0.69607 (17) 0.6831 (2) 0.1909 (3) 0.0314 (5)
H7 0.6346 0.7350 0.1938 0.038*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Co1 0.01396 (18) 0.0244 (2) 0.02025 (19) 0.00132 (12) 0.00333 (12) −0.00054 (13)
S1 0.0187 (2) 0.0350 (3) 0.0329 (3) −0.00349 (18) 0.00085 (18) −0.0080 (2)
O1 0.0261 (7) 0.0401 (9) 0.0392 (9) −0.0061 (7) −0.0036 (6) 0.0038 (7)
O2 0.0210 (7) 0.0621 (12) 0.0403 (9) 0.0061 (7) 0.0078 (6) 0.0027 (8)
O1W 0.0248 (7) 0.0294 (7) 0.0337 (8) 0.0049 (6) 0.0034 (6) 0.0022 (6)
O2W 0.0234 (7) 0.0702 (12) 0.0225 (7) 0.0067 (7) 0.0068 (6) −0.0021 (7)
N1 0.0169 (7) 0.0273 (8) 0.0281 (8) 0.0001 (6) 0.0041 (6) −0.0015 (6)
C1 0.0168 (8) 0.0434 (12) 0.0263 (9) −0.0039 (8) 0.0034 (7) 0.0109 (9)
C2 0.0172 (8) 0.0392 (11) 0.0297 (10) 0.0010 (7) 0.0026 (7) −0.0015 (8)
C3 0.0189 (8) 0.0261 (9) 0.0287 (9) −0.0022 (7) 0.0049 (7) −0.0042 (8)
C4 0.0169 (8) 0.0272 (9) 0.0317 (10) 0.0009 (7) 0.0050 (7) −0.0023 (8)
C5 0.0173 (8) 0.0266 (9) 0.0230 (8) −0.0013 (6) 0.0033 (6) 0.0005 (7)
C6 0.0226 (9) 0.0286 (10) 0.0382 (11) −0.0003 (7) 0.0053 (8) −0.0108 (8)
C7 0.0197 (9) 0.0307 (10) 0.0416 (12) 0.0037 (7) 0.0053 (8) −0.0067 (9)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

Co1—O2Wi 2.0632 (16) N1—C3 1.340 (2)
Co1—O2W 2.0632 (16) N1—C7 1.345 (3)
Co1—O1Wi 2.1034 (15) C1—C2 1.524 (3)
Co1—O1W 2.1034 (15) C2—H2A 0.9700
Co1—N1i 2.1644 (16) C2—H2B 0.9700
Co1—N1 2.1644 (16) C3—C4 1.385 (3)
S1—C5 1.7523 (19) C3—H3 0.9300
S1—C2 1.800 (2) C4—C5 1.389 (3)
O1—C1 1.248 (3) C4—H4 0.9300
O2—C1 1.257 (3) C5—C6 1.397 (3)
O1W—H1W 0.8200 C6—C7 1.382 (3)
O1W—H2W 0.8200 C6—H6 0.9300
O2W—H3W 0.8200 C7—H7 0.9300
O2W—H4W 0.8200
O2Wi—Co1—O2W 180.0 O1—C1—O2 126.42 (19)
O2Wi—Co1—O1Wi 88.52 (7) O1—C1—C2 119.1 (2)
O2W—Co1—O1Wi 91.48 (7) O2—C1—C2 114.4 (2)
O2Wi—Co1—O1W 91.48 (7) C1—C2—S1 111.63 (16)
O2W—Co1—O1W 88.52 (7) C1—C2—H2A 109.3
O1Wi—Co1—O1W 180.0 S1—C2—H2A 109.3
O2Wi—Co1—N1i 87.28 (7) C1—C2—H2B 109.3
O2W—Co1—N1i 92.72 (7) S1—C2—H2B 109.3
O1Wi—Co1—N1i 90.07 (6) H2A—C2—H2B 108.0
O1W—Co1—N1i 89.93 (6) N1—C3—C4 123.78 (18)
O2Wi—Co1—N1 92.72 (7) N1—C3—H3 118.1
O2W—Co1—N1 87.28 (7) C4—C3—H3 118.1
O1Wi—Co1—N1 89.93 (6) C3—C4—C5 119.23 (18)
O1W—Co1—N1 90.07 (6) C3—C4—H4 120.4
N1i—Co1—N1 180.0 C5—C4—H4 120.4
C5—S1—C2 102.29 (10) C4—C5—C6 117.35 (17)
Co1—O1W—H1W 116.8 C4—C5—S1 125.34 (15)
Co1—O1W—H2W 111.7 C6—C5—S1 117.27 (15)
H1W—O1W—H2W 109.0 C7—C6—C5 119.40 (19)
Co1—O2W—H3W 118.7 C7—C6—H6 120.3
Co1—O2W—H4W 125.3 C5—C6—H6 120.3
H3W—O2W—H4W 113.0 N1—C7—C6 123.38 (18)
C3—N1—C7 116.71 (16) N1—C7—H7 118.3
C3—N1—Co1 122.00 (13) C6—C7—H7 118.3
C7—N1—Co1 120.65 (13)
O2Wi—Co1—N1—C3 −59.79 (17) Co1—N1—C3—C4 −168.13 (16)
O2W—Co1—N1—C3 120.21 (17) N1—C3—C4—C5 0.2 (3)
O1Wi—Co1—N1—C3 −148.31 (17) C3—C4—C5—C6 −3.3 (3)
O1W—Co1—N1—C3 31.69 (17) C3—C4—C5—S1 174.30 (16)
O2Wi—Co1—N1—C7 129.63 (17) C2—S1—C5—C4 8.6 (2)
O2W—Co1—N1—C7 −50.37 (17) C2—S1—C5—C6 −173.75 (17)
O1Wi—Co1—N1—C7 41.12 (17) C4—C5—C6—C7 3.5 (3)
O1W—Co1—N1—C7 −138.88 (17) S1—C5—C6—C7 −174.29 (18)
O1—C1—C2—S1 −5.4 (3) C3—N1—C7—C6 −2.6 (3)
O2—C1—C2—S1 175.01 (16) Co1—N1—C7—C6 168.50 (19)
C5—S1—C2—C1 −176.55 (15) C5—C6—C7—N1 −0.6 (4)
C7—N1—C3—C4 2.8 (3)

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
O1W—H1W···O1ii 0.82 2.05 2.849 (2) 163
O1W—H2W···O1iii 0.82 1.95 2.757 (2) 167
O2W—H3W···O2iii 0.82 1.91 2.725 (2) 176
O2W—H4W···O2iv 0.82 1.95 2.743 (2) 163

Symmetry codes: (ii) −x+2, y−1/2, −z+1/2; (iii) −x+2, −y+1, −z+1; (iv) x−1, y, z.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: EZ2135).

References

  1. Allen, F. H., Johnson, O., Shields, G. P., Smith, B. R. & Towler, M. (2004). J. Appl. Cryst.37, 335–338.
  2. Bernstein, J., Davis, R. E., Shimoni, L. & Chang, N.-L. (1995). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.34, 1555–1573.
  3. Chiang, W., Ho, D. M., Van Engen, D. & Thompson, M. E. (1993). Inorg. Chem.32, 2886–2893.
  4. Du, M. & Li, C.-P. (2006). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 359, 1690–1696.
  5. Du, M., Zhao, X.-J. & Wang, Y. (2004). Dalton Trans. pp. 2065–2072. [DOI] [PubMed]
  6. Fang, R.-Q., Zhang, X.-M., Wu, H.-S. & Ng, S. W. (2004). Acta Cryst. E60, m401–m402.
  7. Farrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst.30, 565.
  8. Kondo, M., Miyazawa, M., Irie, Y., Shinagawa, R., Horiba, T., Nakamura, A., Naito, T., Maeda, K., Utsuno, S. & Uchida, F. (2002). Chem. Commun. pp. 2156–2157. [DOI] [PubMed]
  9. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  10. Siemens (1994). XSCANS and XEMP Siemens Analytical X-ray Instruments Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  11. Zhang, X.-M., Fang, R.-Q., Wu, H.-S. & Ng, S. W. (2004). Acta Cryst. E60, m135–m136.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808023593/ez2135sup1.cif

e-64-m1089-sup1.cif (16.6KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808023593/ez2135Isup2.hkl

e-64-m1089-Isup2.hkl (127.6KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES