Skip to main content
Indian Journal of Psychiatry logoLink to Indian Journal of Psychiatry
. 2000 Oct-Dec;42(4):378–386.

ENDORSEMENT AND CONCORDANCE OF ICD-10 VERSUS DSM-IV CRITERIA FOR SUBSTANCE DEPENDENCE : INDIAN PERSPECTIVE

Debasish Basu *,*, Nitin Gupta , Narendra Singh , Surendra K Mattoo §, Parmanand Kulhara
PMCID: PMC2962738  PMID: 21407974

Abstract

Substance use disorders have undergone major changes in both the international (ICD-10) and American (DSM-IV) nosological systems, thus necessitating a study of cross-system agreement between ICD-10 and DSM-IV substance dependence, especially from a developing country setting. Further, endorsement rates for various substance dependence criteria in the two systems need to be studied from a similar perspective. Hence, 221 consecutive patients with 279 diagnostic categories of substance dependence attending a de-addiction centre in Northern India were studied with regard to endorsement of the various ICD-10 and DSM-IV criteria as well as for cross-system agreement for severity of dependence. High endorsement rates were seen for most criteria in both the systems, except for those related to ‘persistence despite harm’ and ‘salience (neglect of various activities, plus excessive time spent to procure the substance)’. There were some significant differences, however, between endorsement rates across different substance categories in both the systems. Cross-system agreement on severity of substance dependence ranged from fair to good for all categories combined, and was good to excellent for the opioid category. The category of ‘others’ (nicotine, cannabis and sedative-hypnotics) showed poor cross-system agreement Overall, the results lend support to the basic theoretical construct behind both ICD-10 and DSM-IV substance dependence syndrome from a developing country perspective.

Keywords: Substance dependence, diagnosis, endorsement, agreement, nosological systems

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (373.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Babor T. F., Mendelson J. H. Ethnic/religious differences in the manifestation and treatment of alcoholism. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1986;472:46–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1986.tb29610.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cottler L. B. Comparing DSM-III-R and ICD-10 substance use disorders. Addiction. 1993 May;88(5):689–696. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02082.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cottler L. B., Helzer J. E., Mager D., Spitznagel E. L., Compton W. M. Agreement between DSM-III and III-R substance use disorders. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1991 Dec;29(1):17–25. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(91)90018-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Edwards G., Arif A., Hadgson R. Nomenclature and classification of drug- and alcohol-related problems: a WHO Memorandum. Bull World Health Organ. 1981;59(2):225–242. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Edwards G., Gross M. M. Alcohol dependence: provisional description of a clinical syndrome. Br Med J. 1976 May 1;1(6017):1058–1061. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6017.1058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Edwards G. The alcohol dependence syndrome: a concept as stimulus to enquiry. Br J Addict. 1986 Apr;81(2):171–183. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1986.tb00313.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Grant B. F., Harford T. C., Hasin D. S., Chou P., Pickering R. DSM-III-R and the proposed DSM-IV alcohol use disorders, United States 1988: a nosological comparison. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1992 Apr;16(2):215–221. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1992.tb01366.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Grant B. F. ICD-10 and proposed DSM-IV harmful use of alcohol/alcohol abuse and dependence, United States 1988: a nosological comparison. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1993 Oct;17(5):1093–1101. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1993.tb05670.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hasin D. S., Grant B. Nosological comparisons of DSM-III-R and DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence in a clinical facility: comparison with the 1988 National Health Interview Survey results. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1994 Apr;18(2):272–279. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1994.tb00014.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Langenbucher J., Morgenstern J., Labouvie E., Nathan P. E. Diagnostic concordance of substance use disorders in DSM-III, DSM-IV and ICD-10. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1994 Dec;36(3):193–203. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(94)90145-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rounsaville B. J., Bryant K., Babor T., Kranzler H., Kadden R. Cross system agreement for substance use disorders: DSM-III-R, DSM-IV and ICD-10. Addiction. 1993 Mar;88(3):337–348. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb00821.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rounsaville B. J., Spitzer R. L., Williams J. B. Proposed changes in DSM-III substance use disorders: description and rationale. Am J Psychiatry. 1986 Apr;143(4):463–468. doi: 10.1176/ajp.143.4.463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES