Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Oct 25.
Published in final edited form as: J Perinat Med. 2010 Mar;38(2):129–139. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2009.140

Retinol Binding Protein 4 – A Novel Association with Early-Onset Preeclampsia

Edi Vaisbuch 1,2, Roberto Romero 1,2,3, Shali Mazaki-Tovi 1,2, Offer Erez 1,2, Sun Kwon Kim 1, Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa 1,2, Francesca Gotsch 1, Nandor Gabor Than 1, Zhong Dong 1, Percy Pacora 1, Ronald Lamont 1,2, Lami Yeo 1,2, Sonia S Hassan 1,2, Juan Pedro Kusanovic 1,2
PMCID: PMC2962937  NIHMSID: NIHMS230024  PMID: 19708829

Abstract

Objective

Dysregulation of maternal circulating adipokines has been implicated in several “great obstetrical syndromes” including preeclampsia (PE), small-for-gestational age (SGA) neonate and fetal death (FD). It has been suggested that adipokines provide a molecular link between metabolic derangements and inflammatory response in complicated pregnancies. Retinol binding protein 4 (RBP4), a novel adipokine, plays a role in obesity-related disorders, as well as in the regulation of the immune response. The aim of this study was to determine whether there are changes in maternal plasma concentrations of RBP4 in patients with PE and in those with an SGA neonate or FD.

Study design

This cross-sectional study included patients in the following groups: 1) normal pregnancy (n=134); 2) PE (n=104); 3) SGA neonate (n=28); and 4) FD (n=37). Maternal plasma RBP4 concentrations were determined by ELISA. Non-parametric statistics were used for analysis.

Results

1) The median maternal plasma RBP4 concentration was higher among patients with PE than in those with a normal pregnancy (p=0.03); 2) The median maternal plasma RBP4 concentrations of patients with preterm PE (<37 weeks) was higher than that of those with term PE (p=0.017) and than that of those with a normal pregnancy (p=0.002); 3) The median maternal plasma RBP4 concentration did not differ significantly between patients with a normal pregnancy and those with an SGA neonate or with an FD; 4) Among normal pregnant women, the maternal plasma RBP4 concentrations did not correlate with pre-pregnancy body mass index, gestational age at blood sampling and neonatal birthweight.

Conclusions

1) Preeclampsia, but not pregnancy with an SGA neonate or an FD, is associated with a higher median maternal plasma concentration of RBP4 than normal pregnancy; 2) Preterm PE, and specifically early-onset PE, is associated with higher median RBP4 concentrations in maternal plasma compared to term PE. These findings suggest a role for RBP4 in the pathogenesis of preterm PE, but not in SGA and FD.

Keywords: Adipokines, fetal death (FD), fetal demise, intrauterine fetal death (IUFD), pregnancy, RBP4, small-for-gestational age (SGA) neonate

Introduction

Preeclampsia is a leading cause of maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity[27, 61, 106, 110], and together with small-for-gestational age (SGA) neonate and fetal death are part of the “great obstetrical syndromes”[102]. Consistent with the syndromic nature, of these conditions, several mechanism of disease have been associated with their clinical manifestations, such as an anti-angiogenic state[16, 17, 30, 31, 38, 57, 59, 60, 65, 103, 122, 126], abnormal physiologic transformation of the spiral arteries[14, 15, 26, 83, 91], chronic uteroplacental ischemia[ 12, 41, 85, 100, 108], increased trophoblast apoptosis/necrosis[51] and endothelial cell dysfunction [22, 36, 92, 97, 99, 119]. Notably, preeclampsia, SGA and fetal death have all been associated with maternal metabolic complications such as obesity[23, 29, 109, 110, 129], insulin resistance[34, 52, 115, 131] and dyslipidemia [42, 128]. In addition, these women have an increased risk of metabolic syndrome-related morbidity[20, 39, 44, 111] and mortality[49, 53, 113] later in life.

Adipokines are a family of biologically active adipocyte-derived cytokines/hormones, such as leptin, adiponectin, visfatin and resistin, as well as tumor necrosis factor (TNF), interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1 and monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1)[120]. Adipokines have been implicated in the physiology and pathophysiology of glucose homeostasis, providing a link between obesity, insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM)[120]. In addition, adipocytokines play a role in the pathophysiology of inflammatory disorders such as asthma[43], inflammatory bowel disease[6, 123], rheumatoid arthritis[10, 105] and obesity[32, 121, 132, 133]. Alterations in circulating concentrations of adipokines such as leptin, adiponectin, visfatin and TNF-α have been associated with the pathogenesis of preeclampsia[24, 25, 45, 64, 81, 86, 95], SGA[70, 75] and fetal death[89], as well as other complications of pregnancy [58, 68, 69, 71-74, 76-80, 82, 87, 88, 125].

Retinol binding protein 4 (RBP4), previously thought to be only a specific carrier for retinol and be produced mainly by the liver, has recently[132] been added to the rapidly expanding family of adipokines. RBP4 is suggested to have a role in obesity-induced insulin resistance and, like other adipokines, increased circulating RBP4 concentrations have been reported in patients with diabetes[132] as well as in those destine to develop overt diabetes[21, 40]. Thus, lowering RBP4 concentrations has been suggested as a potential therapeutic target in type 2 DM[40, 118, 132]. Furthermore, RBP4 may play a role in inflammation[5, 134]. Indeed, in non-diabetic human subjects, RBP4 gene expression was found to be strongly associated with inflammatory markers of adipose tissue such as CD68 and MCP-1[134].

Currently, there is only one report[117] of RBP4 concentrations in patients with preeclampsia which found no association between maternal circulating concentrations of RBP4 and preeclampsia. Moreover, there is no data regarding changes in circulating RBP4 in patients with SGA or fetal death. The aim of this study was to determine whether maternal plasma concentration of RBP4 is associated with preeclampsia, delivery of an SGA neonate or a fetal death.

Materials and methods

Study groups and inclusion criteria

A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted comprising women in the following groups: 1) normal pregnant women (n=134); 2) patients with preeclampsia (n=104); 3) pregnant women without preeclampsia or hypertension who delivered an SGA neonate (n=28); and 4) patients without preeclampsia or hypertension who had a fetal death (n=37). Women with multiple pregnancies or fetuses with congenital and/or chromosomal anomalies were excluded.

Samples and data were retrieved from our bank of biological samples and clinical databases. Many of these samples have previously been used to study the biology of inflammation, hemostasis, and angiogenesis regulation in normal pregnant women and those with pregnancy complications.

All participants provided written informed consent prior to the collection of maternal blood. The collection of maternal blood and its use for research purposes was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the Sotero del Rio Hospital (Chile), Wayne State University (Detroit, Michigan, USA) and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD/NIH/DHHS).

Clinical Definitions

Women with a normal pregnancy were defined as those without medical, obstetrical, or surgical complications at the time of the study and who subsequently delivered at term (>37 weeks of gestation) an appropriate-for-gestational age infant[3], without neonatal complications. Preeclampsia was defined as the onset hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg on at least two occasions, 4 hours to 1 week apart) after 20 weeks of gestation with proteinuria (≥300 mg in a 24 hour urine collection or at least one dipstick measurement ≥2+)[1]. Severe preeclampsia was diagnosed according to the criteria proposed by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) committee[1]. Preterm preeclampsia was defined as the development of preeclampsia before 37 completed weeks of gestation. Patients with preeclampsia were further classified as either having early-onset (<32 weeks), or late-onset (≥32 weeks) disease according to the gestational age at which preeclampsia was diagnosed. SGA was defined as birthweight below the 10th percentile[3]. Women with a fetal death included those with a singleton pregnancy and fetal death diagnosed after 20 weeks of gestation. Fetal death was determined by absence of heart motion on ultrasound examination. The body mass index (BMI) was calculated using the formula: weight (kg)/height (m2). The study population was classified according to the pre-pregnancy BMI into two groups: normal weight (BMI <25 kg/m2) and overweight/obese (BMI ≥25 kg/m2) women[2].

Sample collection and determination of RBP4 in maternal plasma

Maternal blood samples were obtained once from each woman at the time of diagnosis and collected in vials containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. The samples were then centrifuged at 1300 × g for 10 minutes at 4°C and the obtained plasma was stored at -80°C until assayed. Maternal plasma concentration of RBP4 was determined by sensitive enzyme-linked immunoassays (Millipore Corporation, St. Charles, MO, USA). The RBP4 immunoassay was validated for human plasma in our laboratory, prior to the conduction of this study. Immunoassays were carried out according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. The calculated inter- and intra-assay coefficients of variation for RBP4 immunoassays in our laboratory were 5% and 5.1%, respectively. The sensitivity was calculated to be 0.10 ng/mL.

Statistical analysis

Normality of the data was tested using the Shapiro-Wilk and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests. Since maternal plasma RBP4 concentrations were not normally distributed, Kruskal–Wallis test with post-hoc analysis by Mann-Whitney U test were used for comparisons of continuous variables. Comparison of proportions was performed using Chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests. Correlations between RBP4 concentrations and pre-pregnancy BMI and gestational age at blood sampling were examined using Spearman’s rank correlation test. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Analysis was performed with SPSS, version 14 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Demographic and clinical characteristics of women with a normal pregnancy, preeclampsia, an SGA neonate and a fetal death are listed in Table 1. Compared to women with a normal pregnancy, patients with preeclampsia had a higher rate of nulliparity, women with an SGA neonate were more likely to smoke and to have a lower pre-pregnancy BMI, and those with a fetal death had a lower median gestational age at blood sampling. All three groups had a lower median gestational age at delivery and a lower median neonatal birthweight than women with a normal pregnancy.

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population.

Normal Pregnancy (n=134) PE (n=104) p1 SGA (n=28) p2 Fetal Death (n=37) p3
Maternal age (years) 25 (21-29) 23.5 (20-29) NS 23 (20-28.5) NS 27 (25-29.5) NS
Ethnicity, African American 79.5 (105/132) 81.7 (85) NS 89.3 (25) NS 88.9 (32/36) NS
Smoking 17.4 (23/132) 13.5 (14) NS 42.9 (12) 0.005 32.4 (12) NS
Nulliparity 27.6 (37) 62.5 (65) <0.001 46.4 (13) NS 29.7 (11) NS
Pre-pregnancy BMI (kg/m2) 26.4 (22.6-33.1) 26.6 (23.5-30.0) NS 23.1 (18.5-28.8) 0.027 27.9 (24.9-32.9) NS
Gestational age at blood sampling (weeks) 37.6 (31.1-39.1) 36.0 (31.6-38.5) NS 37.4 (34.7-38.4) NS 31 (26.9-36.6) 0.002
Gestational age at delivery (weeks) 39.3 (38.7-40.2) 36 (32.3-38.6) <0.001 37.6 (36.3-38.4) <0.001 31 (27.4-36.7) <0.001
Sample storage time (years) 7.7 (6.8-8.1) 7.5 (6.8-8.0) NS 7.3 (6.6-7.6) NS 7.5 (6.8-7.9) NS
Birth weight (g) 3342 (3100-3629 2195 (1480-2815) <0.001 2240 (1897-2470) <0.001 1417 (779-2263) <0.001

Values are expressed as median (interquartile range) or % (number);

PE – preeclampsia; SGA – Small-for-gestational age; BMI – Body Mass Index; NS - Not significant;

p1 – between preeclampsia and normal pregnancy

p2 – between SGA and normal pregnancy

p3 – between fetal death and normal pregnancy

Maternal plasma RBP4 concentration in normal pregnancy

Retinol binding protein 4 was detected in the maternal plasma of all subjects included in this study. Among women with a normal pregnancy outcome, maternal plasma RBP4 concentration did not correlated with pre-pregnancy BMI (Spearman’s rho -0.64, p=0.6), gestational age at blood sampling (Spearman’s rho -0.038, p=0.7) or neonatal birthweight (Spearman’s rho -0.032, p=0.8). In addition, the median maternal plasma RBP4 concentration did not differ significantly between women with a normal BMI and overweigh/obese women (median 9025.5 ng/mL, IQR 7681.9-10811 vs. 9023.4 ng/mL, IQR 7272.0-10506.7, respectively; p=0.8). Similarly, there was no significant difference between women who smoked and those who did not (8102.5 ng/mL, IQR 7090.3-10332.8 vs. 9168.8 ng/mL, IQR 7602.9-10245.9, respectively; p=0.3).

Maternal plasma RBP4 concentration in patients with preeclampsia

The median maternal plasma RBP4 concentration was higher in women with preeclampsia than in those with a normal pregnancy outcome (9769.3 ng/mL vs. 9080.9 ng/mL, p=0.03; Figure 1). In patients with preeclampsia, the maternal plasma RBP4 concentrations correlated with gestational age at blood sampling (Spearman’s rho -0.34, p<0.001) and neonatal birthweight (Spearman’s rho -0.31, p=0.01, but not with pre-pregnancy BMI (Spearman’s rho -0.03, p=0.77). The median maternal plasma RBP4 concentration did not differ significantly between women with a normal BMI and overweight/obese women with preeclampsia (9888.4 ng/mL vs. 9932.2 ng/mL, respectively; p=0.9).

Figure 1. Box and whisker plot of the comparison of the median plasma RBP4 concentrations of women with a normal pregnancy and those with preeclampsia, SGA or fetal death.

Figure 1

The median maternal plasma concentration of RBP4 was higher in patients with preeclampsia than in those with a normal pregnancy (9769.3 ng/mL, interquartile range (IQR) 7780.2-11732.8 vs. 9080.9 ng/mL, IQR 7284.4-10741.3, p=0.03). The median maternal plasma concentration of RBP4 was not significantly different between patients with a normal pregnancy (9080.9 ng/mL, IQR 7284.4-10741.3), those with an SGA neonate (8831.3 ng/mL, IQR 7223.9-10056.1, p=0.6) and pregnant women with a fetal death (8877.3 ng/mL, IQR 7730.4-10878.9, p=0.7).

RBP4 in preterm preeclampsia (<37 week’s gestation)

Among patients with preeclampsia, 37% (39/104) had preterm preeclampsia. The median maternal plasma RBP4 concentration of these women was higher than in those with preeclampsia at term (10257.6 ng/mL vs. 9018.3 ng/mL, p=0.017; Figure 2). Similarly, patients with preterm preeclampsia had a higher median RBP4 concentration than women with a normal pregnancy outcome (10257.6 ng/mL vs. 9080.9 ng/mL, p=0.002; Figure 2). There was no significant difference in the median maternal plasma RBP4 concentration between women with term preeclampsia and those with a normal pregnancy (p=0.8, Figure 2).

Figure 2. Box and whisker plot of the comparison of the median maternal plasma RBP4 concentration of patients with preterm (<37 weeks gestation) and term preeclampsia.

Figure 2

The median maternal plasma RBP4 concentration of patients with preterm preeclampsia was higher than in women with a normal pregnancy (10257.6 ng/mL, IQR 8690.4-12500.4 vs. 9080.9 ng/mL, IQR 7284.4-10741.3, p=0.002), as wells as than those with term preeclampsia (9018.3 ng/mL, IQR 7451.4-10768.7, p=0.017). The median RBP4 concentration in maternal plasma did not differ significantly between normal pregnant women and those with term preeclampsia (p=0.8).

RBP4 in early-onset preeclampsia (<32 week’s gestation)

Early-onset preeclampsia (<32 weeks’ gestation) was diagnosed in 27% (28/104) of patients with preeclampsia. The demographic and clinical characteristics of women with early and late-onset preeclampsia (≥32 weeks’ gestation) are displayed in Table 2. The median maternal plasma RBP4 concentration of women with early-onset preeclampsia was higher than in those diagnosed with preeclampsia at ≥32 weeks of gestation (11427 ng/mL vs. 9260.0 ng/mL, p<0.001; Figure 3), as well as than in women with a normal pregnancy (11427 ng/mL, vs. 9080.9 ng/mL, p<0.001; Figure 3). In contrast, the median maternal plasma RBP4 concentration did not differ significantly between patients with preeclampsia diagnosed ≥32 weeks of gestation and normal pregnant women (p=0.8).

Table 2.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with early-onset preeclampsia and those with preeclampsia diagnosed ≥ 32 weeks of gestation.

Gestational age at diagnosis of preeclampsia
< 32 weeks (n=28) ≥32 weeks (n=76) p
Maternal age (years) 24.5 (20-31.7) 23.5 (19-27.7) NS
Ethnicity, African American 67.9 (19) 86.8 (66) NS
Smoking 10.7 (3) 16.9 (11) NS
Nulliparity 67.9 (19) 60.5 (46) NS
Pre-pregnancy BMI (kg/m2) 26.8 (23.5-29.7) 26.6 (23.1-30.1) NS
Gestational age at blood sampling (weeks) 29.5 (27.5-30.5) 37.2 (34.6-39) <0.001
Gestational age at delivery (weeks) 30.1 (27.7-31.7) 37.3 (35.1-39) <0.001
Sample storage time (years) 7.4 (7.1-7.9) 7.5 (6.7-8.1) NS
Birth weight (g) 1150 (775-1370) 2590 (2025-2995) <0.001

Values are expressed as median (interquartile range) or % (number);

BMI – Body Mass Index; NS - Not significant;

Figure 3. Box and whisker plot of the comparison of the median maternal plasma RBP4 concentration of patients with earl-onset preeclampsia (<32 weeks gestation) and those with preeclampsia diagnosed ≥32 weeks’ gestation.

Figure 3

The median maternal plasma RBP4 concentration of patients with early-onset preeclampsia was higher than in women with a normal pregnancy (11427 ng/mL, IQR 9852.9-13560.0 vs. 9080.9 ng/mL, IQR 7284.4-10741.3, p<0.001) and than those with preeclampsia diagnosed ≥32 weeks’ gestation (9260.0 ng/mL, IQR 7456.0-10880.9, p<0.001). The median RBP4 concentration in maternal plasma did not differ significantly between normal pregnant women and those with preeclampsia diagnosed ≥32 weeks’ gestation (p=0.8).

RBP4 in severe preeclampsia and preeclampsia with an SGA neonate

Among patients with preeclampsia, 80% (83/104) had severe preeclampsia, and 49% (51/104) delivered an SGA neonate. There was no significant difference in the median maternal plasma concentration of RBP4 between patients with severe preeclampsia and those with mild preeclampsia (9810.9 ng/mL, IQR 7816.1-11715.7 vs. 9724.7 ng/mL, IQR 7699.4-11754.2, respectively; p=0.7). Similarly, the median maternal plasma RBP4 concentration did not differ significantly between patients with preeclampsia with or without an SGA neonate (9721.6 ng/mL, IQR 8249.3-12393.2 vs. 9837.5 ng/mL, IQR 7603.4-11698.4, respectively; p=0.6).

Maternal plasma RBP4 in patients with an SGA neonate or a fetal death

Among normotensive women with an SGA neonate, 82% (23/28) had a neonate with a birthweight <5th centile for gestational age. The median maternal plasma concentration of RBP4 was not significantly different between women with an SGA neonate and those with a normal pregnancy outcome (8831.3 ng/mL vs. 9080.9 ng/mL, respectively; p=0.6; Figure 1). There was no significant difference in the median maternal plasma RBP4 concentration of women with severe SGA (<5th centile for gestational age) and those whose neonates weighed between the 5th and <10th centiles for gestational age (8938.3 ng/mL, IQR 7112.6-10328.8 vs. 7818.0 ng/mL, IQR 7079.7-9833.9, respectively; p=0.5)

Similarly, the median maternal plasma RBP4 concentrations did not differ significantly between women with a fetal death and those with a normal pregnancy outcome (8877.3 ng/mL vs. 9080.9 ng/mL, respectively; p=0.7; Figure 1).

Discussion

Principal findings of the study

1) Patients with preeclampsia had a higher median maternal plasma concentration of RBP4 than women with a normal pregnancy; 2) Early-onset preeclampsia (<32 weeks) is associated with a higher median maternal plasma RBP4 concentration than late-onset preeclampsia; 3) The median maternal plasma RBP4 concentrations of women with an SGA neonate or fetal death did not differ significantly from normal pregnant women.

RBP4 - a novel adipokine

Retinol binding protein[55] belongs to the lipocalin family and is a specific carrier of retinol from the liver to peripheral tissues. RBP4 is a plasma protein[101], while RBP1, RBP2[28], RBP5 and RBP7 are cellular proteins, and RBP3 is the interstitial form[62].

Although RBP is mainly synthesized by the liver[93], subsequent studies demonstrated that it is also produced by adipocytes[66, 84]. Only recently, RBP4 has been characterized as a novel adipokine when its role in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance has been proposed[132]. RBP4, similar to other adipokines [11, 58, 63, 77-79, 86-88, 112, 120, 121, 132, 133],has also been linked to inflammation[5, 134]. Gene expression of RBP4 was found to be strongly associated with inflammatory markers (i.e., CD68 and MCP-1) of adipose tissue in non-diabetic human subjects[134]. In children, RBP4 concentrations correlated not only with indices of obesity and insulin resistance but also with inflammatory factors such as C-reactive protein and IL-6[5].

RBP4 concentration during normal gestation

Among women with a normal pregnancy, there was no correlation between RBP4 concentrations and maternal age, gestational age at blood sampling, pre-pregnancy BMI and neonatal birthweight. In addition, there was no difference in the median RBP4 concentrations between normal weight and overweight/obese patients, as well as between healthy pregnant women who smoked and those who did not.

Our findings are in agreement with a recent report by Stepan et al[117] in which RBP4 was not associated with gestational age at blood sampling, gestational age at delivery and neonatal birthweight. The authors also reported a lack of correlation between RBP4 and markers of adiposity (BMI, leptin), insulin resistance (fasting glucose, fasting insulin, HOMA-IR and adiponectin) and lipid metabolism (cholesterol, triglycerides)[117]. Similarly, no change in circulating RBP with increasing gestational age was reported[7, 19, 35, 37]. The results of our study demonstrate lack of correlation over a wide range of gestational age (20-42 weeks’ gestation) and that there is no difference in RBP4 concentrations between normal weight and overweight/obese pregnant women.

RBP4 concentration is elevated in preterm preeclampsia but not in term preeclampsia

The finding that the median maternal plasma concentration of RBP4 is higher in patients with preeclampsia than in women with a normal pregnancy outcome is novel. Moreover, among patients with preeclampsia, but not in normal pregnant women, the RBP4 concentrations had a significantly negative correlation with gestational age at blood collection (at the time of diagnosis of preeclampsia). Thus, the earlier the diagnosis, the higher was the maternal plasma RBP4 concentrations. This is pertinent since the timing of the diagnosis of preeclampsia is an important index of severity. The finding that preeclampsia is associated with higher circulating RBP4 concentrations is in agreement with a recent study by Atkinson et al[4].in which a proteomic approach was used to identify novel biomarkers for preeclampsia. The authors found RBP4 to be differentially up-regulated (2.1 fold-change) in the serum of patients with preeclampsia compared to matched healthy pregnant women[4].

Our results are in disagreement with the study reported by Stepan et al[117] regarding RBP4 concentrations in maternal circulation The authors found no significant differences in the mean maternal serum RBP4 concentration between patients with preeclampsia (n=16) compared to normotensive controls (n=20) admitted to the hospital for other obstetrical complications[117]. This apparent contradiction can be explained by differences in sample size, study population and inclusion criteria for the control group. In addition, the authors[117] did not differentiate between term and preterm preeclampsia. The relatively large sample size of our study allowed us to identify higher concentrations of circulating RBP4 in patients with early-onset preeclampsia.

Why is early-onset preeclampsia associated with elevated maternal RBP4 concentrations?

The cross-sectional nature of our study does not allow us to discern a cause-effect relationship between elevated maternal plasma RBP4 concentrations and preeclampsia; however, several suggestions for this findinf can be raised:

  1. An activation of the immune response has been implicated as a cause of endothelial cell dysfunction and preeclampsia [36, 97, 99]. Adhesion molecules play a central role in the adherence of leukocytes to endothelial cells and the subsequent migration of white blood cells into perivascular tissue and have been implicated in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia[18]. A recent study[90] in adults with newly diagnosed type 2 DM reported a positive correlation between RBP4 and soluble adhesion molecules such as sICAM-1 and sE-selectin. It was suggested that RBP4 might be responsible for up-regulating endothelial adhesion molecules and the development of vascular complications in type 2 DM[8, 56]. Furthermore, RBP4 inhibits insulin action in endothelial cells, leading to impaired NO-dependent vasodilation[127]. Thus, the increased maternal plasma RBP4 concentration in patients with preeclampsia may be an additional marker of endothelial dysfunction[90].

  2. Several hallmarks of the metabolic syndrome, which includes abdominal obesity, high level of triglycerides, low level of high-density lipoprotein, cholesterol, high blood pressure, and high fasting glucose are well established risk factors for preeclampsia [29, 34, 42, 48, 50, 52, 54, 110, 115, 131]. Similar to the metabolic syndrome, preeclampsia is emerging as a risk factor for cardiovascular complications later in life[9, 33, 44, 96, 111, 113, 114, 130]. Importantly, Bellami et al[9] reported in a recent meta-analysis that women who had preterm preeclampsia had the greatest risk of future cardiovascular disease, and this was higher than those who had severe preeclampsia, supporting the concept that timing of onset of preeclampsia more accurately reflects the severity of the maternal cardiovascular phenotype[9]. Elevated circulating RBP4 concentration has been linked to insulin resistance[21, 40, 132], a core component of the metabolic syndrome. Moreover, it has been associated with a subclinical cardiovascular disease in the elderly[47]. Thus, the elevated RBP4 concentration found in patients with early-onset preeclampsia may be a marker for a subclinical metabolic syndrome, which is reflected by the greater risk of cardiovascular complications in later life observed in these women compared to those with term preeclampsia[9].

  3. Serum RBP4 concentration has been shown to be elevated in patients with impaired kidney function[94, 104]. In addition, it has been suggested that the increased RBP concentration observed in patients with type 2 DM may be due to impaired kidney function rather than the diabetic state itself[46, 67]. During normal pregnancy, the urinary excretion of RBP is greater than in the non-pregnant state, and increases from the first to the second and third trimester[7, 35]. It is possible that the impaired renal function that accompanies preeclampsia, especially in its more severe form, may lead to decreased glomerular filtration rate and decreased excretion of RBP4 in urine. In our study, a significantly higher proportion of patients with early-onset preeclampsia (<32 weeks) had a urine dipstick measurement ≥3+ protein compared to those diagnosed with preeclampsia later in pregnancy (86% [24/28] vs. 64% [49/76], p=0.03)

  4. The lack of correlation between circulating RBP4 concentrations and obesity-related parameters demonstrated in our study and those of others[117, 124], leads to the suggestion that the liver, rather than adipose tissue, may be involved in regulating the circulating RBP4 concentration[13]. It may be that the differences in the RBP4 concentration between normal pregnant women and those with early-onset preeclampsia are related to liver dysfunction. Hepatic fat accumulation has been demonstrated to increase RBP4[107, 116] and a positive association between alanine aminotransferase and RBP4 concentrations has been recently suggested[98]. In our study, there was a trend toward a higher rate of elevated liver function tests (aspartate aminotransferase >70 IU/L) in patients with early-onset preeclampsia than in those with preeclampsia later in pregnancy (23% [6/23] vs. 11% [8/73], respectively; p=0.1).

RBP4 concentrations in maternal blood are not associated with SGA or fetal death

Although preeclampsia, SGA and fetal death share several common mechanisms of disease, we did not find an association between circulating maternal RBP4 and pregnancies complicated by an SGA infant or a fetal death. These findings suggest that RBP4 does not play a role in the pathophysiology of these obstetrical syndromes among normotensive pregnant women. The elevated concentrations of RBP4 found only in patients with early-onset preeclampsia could be explained by different mechanisms of disease distinguishing this complication from SGA or fetal death. While the clinical manifestations of preeclampsia involve mainly the maternal compartment, SGA and fetal death are primarily a consequence of a fetal disease. Thus, the increased circulating RBP4 concentrations in preeclampsia may reflect an exaggerated maternal inflammatory response, a subclinical metabolic syndrome or other aspects of disease such as renal or liver dysfunction associated with preeclampsia.

In conclusion, we were able to demonstrate, for the first time, an association between higher maternal circulating RBP4 concentration and preeclampsia, specifically among patients with early-onset preeclampsia. Such an association was not evident among normotensive pregnant women with either an SGA neonate or a fetal death. Further studies are needed in order to elucidate the relationship between maternal circulating RBP4 concentration and preeclampsia.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Perinatology Research Branch, Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, DHHS.

Reference List

  • 1.ACOG practice bulletin. Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia and eclampsia. Number 33, January 2002. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99:159–167. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01747-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2003;916:i–viii. 1–149. backcover. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Alexander GR, Himes JH, Kaufman RB, Mor J, Kogan M. A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87:163–168. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00386-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Atkinson KR, Blumenstein M, Black MA, Wu SH, Kasabov N, Taylor RS, et al. An altered pattern of circulating apolipoprotein E3 isoforms is implicated in preeclampsia. J Lipid Res. 2009;50:71–80. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M800296-JLR200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Balagopal P, Graham TE, Kahn BB, Altomare A, Funanage V, George D. Reduction of elevated serum retinol binding protein in obese children by lifestyle intervention: association with subclinical inflammation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:1971–1974. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-2712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Barbier M, Vidal H, Desreumaux P, Dubuquoy L, Bourreille A, Colombel JF, et al. Overexpression of leptin mRNA in mesenteric adipose tissue in inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2003;27:987–991. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Beetham R, Dawnay A, Menabawy M, Silver A. Urinary excretion of albumin and retinol-binding protein during normal pregnancy. J Clin Pathol. 1988;41:1089–1092. doi: 10.1136/jcp.41.10.1089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Behrendt D, Ganz P. Endothelial function. From vascular biology to clinical applications. Am J Cardiol. 2002;90:40L–48L. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02963-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bellamy L, Casas JP, Hingorani AD, Williams DJ. Pre-eclampsia and risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer in later life: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2007;335:974. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39335.385301.BE. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bernotiene E, Palmer G, Talabot-Ayer D, Szalay-Quinodoz I, Aubert ML, Gabay C. Delayed resolution of acute inflammation during zymosan-induced arthritis in leptin-deficient mice. Arthritis Res Ther. 2004;6:R256–R263. doi: 10.1186/ar1174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bokarewa M, Nagaev I, Dahlberg L, Smith U, Tarkowski A. Resistin, an adipokine with potent proinflammatory properties. J Immunol. 2005;174:5789–5795. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.9.5789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bower S, Schuchter K, Campbell S. Doppler ultrasound screening as part of routine antenatal scanning: prediction of pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth retardation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993;100:989–994. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1993.tb15139.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Broch M, Auguet MT, Ramirez R, Olona M, Aguilar C, Megia A, et al. Parallel down-regulation of retinol binding protein-4 (RBP4) and adiponectin expression in subcutaneous adipose tissue of non-morbidly obese subjects. Eur J Endocrinol. 2009 doi: 10.1530/EJE-08-0866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Brosens IA. Morphological changes in the utero-placental bed in pregnancy hypertension. Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1977;4:573–593. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Brosens IA, Robertson WB, Dixon HG. The role of the spiral arteries in the pathogenesis of pre-eclampsia. J Pathol. 1970;101:vi. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chaiworapongsa T, Romero R, Espinoza J, Bujold E, Mee KY, Goncalves LF, et al. Evidence supporting a role for blockade of the vascular endothelial growth factor system in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia. Young Investigator Award. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:1541–1547. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.03.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chaiworapongsa T, Romero R, Kim YM, Kim GJ, Kim MR, Espinoza J, et al. Plasma soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 concentration is elevated prior to the clinical diagnosis of pre-eclampsia. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2005;17:3–18. doi: 10.1080/14767050400028816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chaiworapongsa T, Romero R, Yoshimatsu J, Espinoza J, Kim YM, Park K, et al. Soluble adhesion molecule profile in normal pregnancy and pre-eclampsia. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2002;12:19–27. doi: 10.1080/jmf.12.1.19.27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chan TF, Chen HS, Chen YC, Lee CH, Chou FH, Chen IJ, et al. Increased serum retinol-binding protein 4 concentrations in women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Reprod Sci. 2007;14:169–174. doi: 10.1177/1933719106298407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chesley SC, Annitto JE, Cosgrove RA. The remote prognosis of eclamptic women. Sixth periodic report. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976;124:446–459. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(76)90168-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cho YM, Youn BS, Lee H, Lee N, Min SS, Kwak SH, et al. Plasma retinol-binding protein-4 concentrations are elevated in human subjects with impaired glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:2457–2461. doi: 10.2337/dc06-0360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Clark BA, Halvorson L, Sachs B, Epstein FH. Plasma endothelin levels in preeclampsia: elevation and correlation with uric acid levels and renal impairment. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166:962–968. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(92)91372-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cnattingius S, Bergstrom R, Lipworth L, Kramer MS. Prepregnancy weight and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:147–152. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199801153380302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cortelazzi D, Corbetta S, Ronzoni S, Pelle F, Marconi A, Cozzi V, et al. Maternal and foetal resistin and adiponectin concentrations in normal and complicated pregnancies. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2007;66:447–453. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2007.02761.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.D’Anna R, Baviera G, Corrado F, Giordano D, De VA, Nicocia G, et al. Adiponectin and insulin resistance in early- and late-onset pre-eclampsia. BJOG. 2006;113:1264–1269. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01078.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.De Wolf F, Brosens I, Renaer M. Fetal growth retardation and the maternal arterial supply of the human placenta in the absence of sustained hypertension. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1980;87:678–685. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1980.tb04601.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Dekker GA, Sibai BM. Etiology and pathogenesis of preeclampsia: current concepts. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179:1359–1375. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70160-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Demmer LA, Birkenmeier EH, Sweetser DA, Levin MS, Zollman S, Sparkes RS, et al. The cellular retinol binding protein II gene. Sequence analysis of the rat gene, chromosomal localization in mice and humans, and documentation of its close linkage to the cellular retinol binding protein gene. J Biol Chem. 1987;262:2458–2467. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Eskenazi B, Fenster L, Sidney S. A multivariate analysis of risk factors for preeclampsia. JAMA. 1991;266:237–241. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Espinoza J, Nien JK, Kusanovic JP, Goncalves LF, Medina LH, Gomez R, et al. The combined use of uterine artery Doppler and maternal plasma placental growth factor concentrations identifies patients at risk for early onset and/or severe preeclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;28:387–388. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Espinoza J, Romero R, Nien JK, Kusanovic JP, Richani K, Gomez R, et al. A role of the anti-angiogenic factor sVEGFR-1 in the ‘mirror syndrome’ (Ballantyne’s syndrome) J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2006;19:607–613. doi: 10.1080/14767050600922677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Esposito K, Pontillo A, Di PC, Giugliano G, Masella M, Marfella R, et al. Effect of weight loss and lifestyle changes on vascular inflammatory markers in obese women: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2003;289:1799–1804. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.14.1799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Funai EF, Friedlander Y, Paltiel O, Tiram E, Xue X, Deutsch L, et al. Long-term mortality after preeclampsia. Epidemiology. 2005;16:206–215. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000152912.02042.cd. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Garner PR, D’Alton ME, Dudley DK, Huard P, Hardie M. Preeclampsia in diabetic pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;163:505–508. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)91184-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gero G, Anthony F, Rowe DJ, Dennis KJ. Increased urinary excretion of retinol-binding protein during normal pregnancies. Clin Chem. 1986;32:916–917. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Gervasi MT, Chaiworapongsa T, Pacora P, Naccasha N, Yoon BH, Maymon E, et al. Phenotypic and metabolic characteristics of monocytes and granulocytes in preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:792–797. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.117311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Giacoia GP. Concentration of serum prealbumin and retinol-binding proteins during pregnancy. South Med J. 1984;77:1261–1263. doi: 10.1097/00007611-198410000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Girardi G, Yarilin D, Thurman JM, Holers VM, Salmon JE. Complement activation induces dysregulation of angiogenic factors and causes fetal rejection and growth restriction. J Exp Med. 2006;203:2165–2175. doi: 10.1084/jem.20061022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Girouard J, Giguere Y, Moutquin JM, Forest JC. Previous hypertensive disease of pregnancy is associated with alterations of markers of insulin resistance. Hypertension. 2007;49:1056–1062. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.087528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Graham TE, Yang Q, Bluher M, Hammarstedt A, Ciaraldi TP, Henry RR, et al. Retinol-binding protein 4 and insulin resistance in lean, obese, and diabetic subjects. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:2552–2563. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa054862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Granger JP, Alexander BT, Llinas MT, Bennett WA, Khalil RA. Pathophysiology of preeclampsia: linking placental ischemia/hypoxia with microvascular dysfunction. Microcirculation. 2002;9:147–160. doi: 10.1038/sj.mn.7800137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Gratacos E, Casals E, Sanllehy C, Cararach V, Alonso PL, Fortuny A. Variation in lipid levels during pregnancy in women with different types of hypertension. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1996;75:896–901. doi: 10.3109/00016349609055024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Guler N, Kirerleri E, Ones U, Tamay Z, Salmayenli N, Darendeliler F. Leptin: does it have any role in childhood asthma? J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;114:254–259. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.03.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hannaford P, Ferry S, Hirsch S. Cardiovascular sequelae of toxaemia of pregnancy. Heart. 1997;77:154–158. doi: 10.1136/hrt.77.2.154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hendler I, Blackwell SC, Mehta SH, Whitty JE, Russell E, Sorokin Y, et al. The levels of leptin, adiponectin, and resistin in normal weight, overweight, and obese pregnant women with and without preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:979–983. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.06.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Henze A, Frey SK, Raila J, Tepel M, Scholze A, Pfeiffer AF, et al. Evidence that kidney function but not type 2 diabetes determines retinol-binding protein 4 serum levels. Diabetes. 2008;57:3323–3326. doi: 10.2337/db08-0866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ingelsson E, Lind L. Circulating retinol-binding protein 4 and subclinical cardiovascular disease in the elderly. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:733–735. doi: 10.2337/dc08-1656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Innes KE, Wimsatt JH, McDuffie R. Relative glucose tolerance and subsequent development of hypertension in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97:905–910. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01342-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Irgens HU, Reisaeter L, Irgens LM, Lie RT. Long term mortality of mothers and fathers after pre-eclampsia: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2001;323:1213–1217. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7323.1213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Isezuo SA, Ekele BA. Comparison of metabolic syndrome variables among pregnant women with and without eclampsia. J Natl Med Assoc. 2008;100:1059–1062. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)31444-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Ishihara N, Matsuo H, Murakoshi H, Laoag-Fernandez JB, Samoto T, Maruo T. Increased apoptosis in the syncytiotrophoblast in human term placentas complicated by either preeclampsia or intrauterine growth retardation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:158–166. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.119176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Joffe GM, Esterlitz JR, Levine RJ, Clemens JD, Ewell MG, Sibai BM, et al. The relationship between abnormal glucose tolerance and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in healthy nulliparous women. Calcium for Preeclampsia Prevention (CPEP) Study Group. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179:1032–1037. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70210-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Jonsdottir LS, Arngrimsson R, Geirsson RT, Sigvaldason H, Sigfusson N. Death rates from ischemic heart disease in women with a history of hypertension in pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1995;74:772–776. doi: 10.3109/00016349509021195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kaaja R, Laivuori H, Laakso M, Tikkanen MJ, Ylikorkala O. Evidence of a state of increased insulin resistance in preeclampsia. Metabolism. 1999;48:892–896. doi: 10.1016/s0026-0495(99)90225-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kanai M, Raz A, Goodman DS. Retinol-binding protein: the transport protein for vitamin A in human plasma. J Clin Invest. 1968;47:2025–2044. doi: 10.1172/JCI105889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kuboki K, Jiang ZY, Takahara N, Ha SW, Igarashi M, Yamauchi T, et al. Regulation of endothelial constitutive nitric oxide synthase gene expression in endothelial cells and in vivo : a specific vascular action of insulin. Circulation. 2000;101:676–681. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.101.6.676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kupferminc MJ, Daniel Y, Englender T, Baram A, Many A, Jaffa AJ, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor is increased in patients with preeclampsia. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1997;38:302–306. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1997.tb00519.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kusanovic JP, Romero R, Mazaki-Tovi S, Chaiworapongsa T, Mittal P, Gotsch F, et al. Resistin in amniotic fluid and its association with intra-amniotic infection and inflammation. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008;21:902–916. doi: 10.1080/14767050802320357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Levine RJ, Lam C, Qian C, Yu KF, Maynard SE, Sachs BP, et al. Soluble endoglin and other circulating antiangiogenic factors in preeclampsia. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:992–1005. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa055352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Levine RJ, Maynard SE, Qian C, Lim KH, England LJ, Yu KF, et al. Circulating angiogenic factors and the risk of preeclampsia. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:672–683. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa031884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Lindheimer MD. Hypertension in pregnancy. Hypertension. 1993;22:127–137. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.22.1.127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Liou GI, Fong SL, Gosden J, van TP, Ledbetter DH, Christie S, et al. Human interstitial retinol-binding protein (IRBP): cloning, partial sequence, and chromosomal localization. Somat Cell Mol Genet. 1987;13:315–323. doi: 10.1007/BF01534925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Lord GM, Matarese G, Howard JK, Baker RJ, Bloom SR, Lechler RI. Leptin modulates the T-cell immune response and reverses starvation-induced immunosuppression. Nature. 1998;394:897–901. doi: 10.1038/29795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Lu D, Yang X, Wu Y, Wang H, Huang H, Dong M. Serum adiponectin, leptin and soluble leptin receptor in pre-eclampsia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006 doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Lyall F, Greer IA, Boswell F, Fleming R. Suppression of serum vascular endothelial growth factor immunoreactivity in normal pregnancy and in pre-eclampsia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;104:223–228. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11050.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Makover A, Soprano DR, Wyatt ML, Goodman DS. Localization of retinol-binding protein messenger RNA in the rat kidney and in perinephric fat tissue. J Lipid Res. 1989;30:171–180. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Masaki T, Anan F, Tsubone T, Gotoh K, Chiba S, Katsuragi I, et al. Retinol binding protein 4 concentrations are influenced by renal function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Metabolism. 2008;57:1340–1344. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2008.03.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Mazaki-Tovi S, Romero R, Vaisbuch E, Erez O, Chaiwaropongsa T, Mittal P, et al. Maternal Plasma Visfatin in Preterm Labor. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;22:693–704. doi: 10.1080/14767050902994788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Mazaki-Tovi S, Romero R, Vaisbuch E, Erez O, Mittal P, Chaiwaropongsa T, et al. Dysregulation of maternal serum adiponectin in preterm labor. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009 doi: 10.1080/14767050902994655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Mazaki-Tovi S, Romero R, Vaisbuch E, Erez O, Mittal P, Chaiwaropongsa T, et al. Maternal Serum Adiponectin Multimers in Patients with a Small-For-Gestational-Age Newborn. J Perinat Med. 2009 doi: 10.1515/JPM.2009.128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Mazaki-Tovi S, Romero R, Vaisbuch E, Erez O, Mittal P, Chaiwaropongsa T, et al. Maternal Serum Adiponectin Multimers in Gestational Diabetes. J Perinat Med. 2009 doi: 10.1515/JPM.2009.101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Mazaki-Tovi S, Kanety H, Pariente C, Hemi R, Efraty Y, Schiff E, et al. Determining the source of fetal adiponectin. J Reprod Med. 2007;52:774–778. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Mazaki-Tovi S, Kanety H, Pariente C, Hemi R, Schiff E, Sivan E. Cord blood adiponectin in large-for-gestational age newborns. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:1238–1242. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.05.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Mazaki-Tovi S, Kanety H, Pariente C, Hemi R, Wiser A, Schiff E, et al. Maternal serum adiponectin levels during human pregnancy. J Perinatol. 2007;27:77–81. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Mazaki-Tovi S, Kanety H, Pariente C, Hemi R, Yinon Y, Wiser A, et al. Adiponectin and leptin concentrations in dichorionic twins with discordant and concordant growth. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:892–898. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-2118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Mazaki-Tovi S, Kanety H, Sivan E. Adiponectin and human pregnancy. Curr Diab Rep. 2005;5:278–281. doi: 10.1007/s11892-005-0023-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Mazaki-Tovi S, Romero R, Kusanovic JP, Erez O, Gotsch F, Mittal P, et al. Visfatin/Pre-B cell colony-enhancing factor in amniotic fluid in normal pregnancy, spontaneous labor at term, preterm labor and prelabor rupture of membranes: an association with subclinical intrauterine infection in preterm parturition. J Perinat Med. 2008;36:485–496. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2008.084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Mazaki-Tovi S, Romero R, Kusanovic JP, Erez O, Vaisbuch E, Gotsch F, et al. Adiponectin multimers in maternal plasma. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008;21:796–815. doi: 10.1080/14767050802266881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Mazaki-Tovi S, Romero R, Kusanovic JP, Vaisbuch E, Erez O, Than NG, et al. Visfatin in human pregnancy: maternal gestational diabetes vis-a-vis neonatal birthweight. J Perinat Med. 2009;37:218–231. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2009.053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Mazaki-Tovi S, Romero R, Kusanovic JP, Vaisbuch E, Erez O, Than NG, et al. Maternal visfatin concentration in normal pregnancy. J Perinat Med. 2009;37:206–217. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2009.054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Mazaki-Tovi S, Romero R, Vaisbuch E, Kusanovic JP, Erez O, Gotsch F, et al. Maternal serum adiponectin multimers in preeclampsia. J Perinat Med. 2009 doi: 10.1515/JPM.2009.085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Mazaki-Tovi S, Romero R, Vaisbuch E, Kusanovic JP, Erez O, Mittal P, et al. Adiponectin in amniotic fluid in normal pregnancy, spontaneous labor at term, and preterm labor: A novel association with intra-amniotic infection/inflammation. J Matern Neonatal Med. 2009 doi: 10.1080/14767050903026481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Meekins JW, Pijnenborg R, Hanssens M, McFadyen IR, van Asshe A. A study of placental bed spiral arteries and trophoblast invasion in normal and severe pre-eclamptic pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994;101:669–674. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13182.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Montague CT, Prins JB, Sanders L, Zhang J, Sewter CP, Digby J, et al. Depot-related gene expression in human subcutaneous and omental adipocytes. Diabetes. 1998;47:1384–1391. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.47.9.1384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Myatt L. Role of placenta in preeclampsia. Endocrine. 2002;19:103–111. doi: 10.1385/ENDO:19:1:103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Nien JK, Mazaki-Tovi S, Romero R, Erez O, Kusanovic JP, Gotsch F, et al. Adiponectin in severe preeclampsia. J Perinat Med. 2007;35:503–512. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2007.121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Nien JK, Mazaki-Tovi S, Romero R, Erez O, Kusanovic JP, Gotsch F, et al. Plasma adiponectin concentrations in non-pregnant, normal and overweight pregnant women. J Perinat Med. 2007;35:522–531. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2007.123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Nien JK, Mazaki-Tovi S, Romero R, Kusanovic JP, Erez O, Gotsch F, et al. Resistin: a hormone which induces insulin resistance is increased in normal pregnancy. J Perinat Med. 2007;35:513–521. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2007.122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Pacora P, Romero R, Mazaki-Tovi S, Kusanovic JP, Mittal P, Than NG, et al. Adiponectin: A missing link between fetal death and altered metabolic inflammatory and anti-angiogenic states? Reprod Sci. 2009;16:247A. [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Park SE, Kim DH, Lee JH, Park JS, Kang ES, Ahn CW, et al. Retinol-binding protein-4 is associated with endothelial dysfunction in adults with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus. Atherosclerosis. 2008 doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2008.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Pijnenborg R, Anthony J, Davey DA, Rees A, Tiltman A, Vercruysse L, et al. Placental bed spiral arteries in the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991;98:648–655. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1991.tb13450.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Poston L, Chappell LC. Is oxidative stress involved in the aetiology of pre-eclampsia? Acta Paediatr Suppl. 2001;90:3–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2001.tb01619.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Quadro L, Hamberger L, Colantuoni V, Gottesman ME, Blaner WS. Understanding the physiological role of retinol-binding protein in vitamin A metabolism using transgenic and knockout mouse models. Mol Aspects Med. 2003;24:421–430. doi: 10.1016/s0098-2997(03)00038-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Raila J, Henze A, Spranger J, Mohlig M, Pfeiffer AF, Schweigert FJ. Microalbuminuria is a major determinant of elevated plasma retinol-binding protein 4 in type 2 diabetic patients. Kidney Int. 2007;72:505–511. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Ramsay JE, Jamieson N, Greer IA, Sattar N. Paradoxical elevation in adiponectin concentrations in women with preeclampsia. Hypertension. 2003;42:891–894. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000095981.92542.F6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Ray JG, Vermeulen MJ, Schull MJ, Redelmeier DA. Cardiovascular health after maternal placental syndromes (CHAMPS): population-based retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2005;366:1797–1803. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67726-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Redman CW, Sacks GP, Sargent IL. Preeclampsia: an excessive maternal inflammatory response to pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:499–506. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70239-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Ribel-Madsen R, Friedrichsen M, Vaag A, Poulsen P. Retinol-binding protein 4 in twins: regulatory mechanisms and impact of circulating and tissue expression levels on insulin secretion and action. Diabetes. 2009;58:54–60. doi: 10.2337/db08-1019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Roberts JM, Taylor RN, Musci TJ, Rodgers GM, Hubel CA, McLaughlin MK. Preeclampsia: an endothelial cell disorder. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161:1200–1204. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(89)90665-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Robertson WB, Brosens I, Dixon G. Maternal uterine vascular lesions in the hypertensive complications of pregnancy. Perspect Nephrol Hypertens. 1976;5:115–127. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Rocchi M, Covone A, Romeo G, Faraonio R, Colantuoni V. Regional mapping of RBP4 to 10q23----q24 and RBP1 to 3q21----q22 in man. Somat Cell Mol Genet. 1989;15:185–190. doi: 10.1007/BF01535081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Romero R. Prenatal medicine: the child is the father of the man. Prenatal and Neonatal Medicine. 1996;1:8–11. doi: 10.1080/14767050902784171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Romero R, Nien JK, Espinoza J, Todem D, Fu W, Chung H, et al. A longitudinal study of angiogenic (placental growth factor) and anti-angiogenic (soluble endoglin and soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1) factors in normal pregnancy and patients destined to develop preeclampsia and deliver a small for gestational age neonate. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008;21:9–23. doi: 10.1080/14767050701830480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Scarpioni L, Dall’aglio PP, Poisetti PG, Buzio C. Retinol binding protein in serum and in urine of glomerular and tubular nephropathies. Clin Chim Acta. 1976;68:107–113. doi: 10.1016/0009-8981(76)90409-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Schaffler A, Ehling A, Neumann E, Herfarth H, Tarner I, Scholmerich J, et al. Adipocytokines in synovial fluid. JAMA. 2003;290:1709–1710. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.13.1709-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Seely EW. Hypertension in pregnancy: a potential window into long-term cardiovascular risk in women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84:1858–1861. doi: 10.1210/jcem.84.6.5785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Seo JA, Kim NH, Park SY, Kim HY, Ryu OH, Lee KW, et al. Serum retinol-binding protein 4 levels are elevated in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2008;68:555–560. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2007.03072.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Sheppard BL, Bonnar J. An ultrastructural study of utero-placental spiral arteries in hypertensive and normotensive pregnancy and fetal growth retardation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1981;88:695–705. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1981.tb01268.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Sibai BM, Ewell M, Levine RJ, Klebanoff MA, Esterlitz J, Catalano PM, et al. Risk factors associated with preeclampsia in healthy nulliparous women. The Calcium for Preeclampsia Prevention (CPEP) Study Group. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177:1003–1010. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70004-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Sibai BM, Gordon T, Thom E, Caritis SN, Klebanoff M, McNellis D, et al. Risk factors for preeclampsia in healthy nulliparous women: a prospective multicenter study. The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Network of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;172:642–648. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90586-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Sibai BM, Sarinoglu C, Mercer BM. Eclampsia. VII. Pregnancy outcome after eclampsia and long-term prognosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166:1757–1761. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(92)91566-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Silswal N, Singh AK, Aruna B, Mukhopadhyay S, Ghosh S, Ehtesham NZ. Human resistin stimulates the pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-alpha and IL-12 in macrophages by NF-kappaB-dependent pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;334:1092–1101. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.06.202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Smith GC, Pell JP, Walsh D. Pregnancy complications and maternal risk of ischaemic heart disease: a retrospective cohort study of 129,290 births. Lancet. 2001;357:2002–2006. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)05112-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Smith GN, Walker MC, Liu A, Wen SW, Swansburg M, Ramshaw H, et al. A history of preeclampsia identifies women who have underlying cardiovascular risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(58):e1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.06.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Solomon CG, Seely EW. Brief review: hypertension in pregnancy : a manifestation of the insulin resistance syndrome? Hypertension. 2001;37:232–239. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.37.2.232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Stefan N, Hennige AM, Staiger H, Machann J, Schick F, Schleicher E, et al. High circulating retinol-binding protein 4 is associated with elevated liver fat but not with total, subcutaneous, visceral, or intramyocellular fat in humans. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:1173–1178. doi: 10.2337/dc06-2342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Stepan H, Ebert T, Schrey S, Reisenbuchler C, Bluher M, Stumvoll M, et al. Preliminary report: Serum levels of retinol-binding protein 4 in preeclampsia. Metabolism. 2009;58:275–277. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2008.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Tamori Y, Sakaue H, Kasuga M. RBP4, an unexpected adipokine. Nat Med. 2006;12:30–31. doi: 10.1038/nm0106-30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Taylor RN, de Groot CJ, Cho YK, Lim KH. Circulating factors as markers and mediators of endothelial cell dysfunction in preeclampsia. Semin Reprod Endocrinol. 1998;16:17–31. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1016249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Tilg H, Moschen AR. Adipocytokines: mediators linking adipose tissue, inflammation and immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006;6:772–783. doi: 10.1038/nri1937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Tilg H, Moschen AR. Role of adiponectin and PBEF/visfatin as regulators of inflammation: involvement in obesity-associated diseases. Clin Sci (Lond) 2008;114:275–288. doi: 10.1042/CS20070196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Torry DS, Wang HS, Wang TH, Caudle MR, Torry RJ. Preeclampsia is associated with reduced serum levels of placenta growth factor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179:1539–1544. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70021-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Tuzun A, Uygun A, Yesilova Z, Ozel AM, Erdil A, Yaman H, et al. Leptin levels in the acute stage of ulcerative colitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;19:429–432. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2003.03300.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Ueland T, Dalsoren T, Voldner N, Godang K, Henriksen T, Bollerslev J. Retinol-binding protein-4 is not strongly associated with insulin sensitivity in normal pregnancies. Eur J Endocrinol. 2008;159:49–54. doi: 10.1530/EJE-07-0682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Vaisbuch E, Mazaki-Tovi S, Kusanovic JP, Erez O, Than NG, Kim SK, et al. Retinol Binding Protein 4: An Adipokine Associated with Intra-amniotic Infection / Inflammation. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009 doi: 10.3109/14767050902994739. In press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Venkatesha S, Toporsian M, Lam C, Hanai J, Mammoto T, Kim YM, et al. Soluble endoglin contributes to the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Nat Med. 2006;12:642–649. doi: 10.1038/nm1429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Vincent MA, Barrett EJ, Lindner JR, Clark MG, Rattigan S. Inhibiting NOS blocks microvascular recruitment and blunts muscle glucose uptake in response to insulin. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2003;285:E123–E129. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00021.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Wakatsuki A, Ikenoue N, Okatani Y, Shinohara K, Fukaya T. Lipoprotein particles in preeclampsia: susceptibility to oxidative modification. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96:55–59. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)00858-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Weiss JL, Malone FD, Emig D, Ball RH, Nyberg DA, Comstock CH, et al. Obesity, obstetric complications and cesarean delivery rate--a population-based screening study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:1091–1097. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.09.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Wilson BJ, Watson MS, Prescott GJ, Sunderland S, Campbell DM, Hannaford P, et al. Hypertensive diseases of pregnancy and risk of hypertension and stroke in later life: results from cohort study. BMJ. 2003:326–845. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7394.845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Wolf M, Sandler L, Munoz K, Hsu K, Ecker JL, Thadhani R. First trimester insulin resistance and subsequent preeclampsia: a prospective study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87:1563–1568. doi: 10.1210/jcem.87.4.8405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Yang Q, Graham TE, Mody N, Preitner F, Peroni OD, Zabolotny JM, et al. Serum retinol binding protein 4 contributes to insulin resistance in obesity and type 2 diabetes. Nature. 2005;436:356–362. doi: 10.1038/nature03711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Yang WS, Lee WJ, Funahashi T, Tanaka S, Matsuzawa Y, Chao CL, et al. Weight reduction increases plasma levels of an adipose-derived anti-inflammatory protein, adiponectin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:3815–3819. doi: 10.1210/jcem.86.8.7741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Yao-Borengasser A, Varma V, Bodles AM, Rasouli N, Phanavanh B, Lee MJ, et al. Retinol binding protein 4 expression in humans: relationship to insulin resistance, inflammation, and response to pioglitazone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:2590–2597. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-0816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES