Abstract
Purpose
This study examined the efficacy and generalizability of a family-oriented, web-based substance use prevention program to young Asian-American adolescent girls.
Methods
Between September and December 2007, 108 Asian-American girls aged 10-14 years and their mothers were recruited through online advertisements and from community service agencies. Mother-daughter dyads were randomly assigned to an intervention arm or to a test-only control arm. Following pretest measurement, intervention-arm dyads completed a 9-session web-based substance use prevention program. Guided by family interaction theory, the program aimed to improve girls' psychological states, strengthen substance use prevention skills, increase mother-daughter interactions, enhance maternal monitoring, and prevent girls' substance use. Study outcomes were assessed using generalized estimating equations.
Results
At posttest, relative to control-arm girls, intervention-arm girls showed less depressed mood; reported improved self-efficacy and refusal skills; had higher levels of mother-daughter closeness, mother-daughter communication, and maternal monitoring; and reported more family rules against substance use. Intervention-arm girls also reported fewer instances of alcohol, marijuana, and illicit prescription drug use, and expressed lower intentions to use substances in the future.
Conclusions
A family-oriented, web-based substance use prevention program was efficacious in preventing substance use behavior among early Asian-American adolescent girls.
Keywords: Asian Americans, adolescent, female, family, prevention, substance use, computer, web-based
Introduction
Notwithstanding their popular image as members of a model minority group, Asian-American adolescent girls face increasing risks for substance use [1]. Little research has invested in developing and testing prevention programs for Asian-American adolescent girls. Meta-analytic data showing that Asians are nearly excluded from the youth treatment outcome literature highlight the need to include adequate number of Asian Americans in clinical trials [2]. Addressing this research gap, we tested the generalizability of a family-based, gender-specific program with a sample of Asian-American adolescent girls and their mothers, and evaluated the program's outcomes on girls' substance use, psychological states, substance use prevention skills, parent-child interactions, and parental monitoring and rules against substance use.
Methods
Study participants were recruited through advertisements on craigslist.org and in mailings to Asian community service agencies in 19 states with significant Asian populations between September and December 2007. To be eligible, girls needed to be Asian, be aged between 11 and 14 years, have private access to a computer, and have mothers' active participation. Among 206 mother-daughter dyads screened, 98 were excluded (37 ineligible, 36 failed to consent/assent, 25 unreachable by mail) and 108 were recruited and randomized. The study protocol was approved by Columbia University's Institutional Review Board.
Procedure
Mother-daughter dyads were randomly assigned to intervention (n = 56) and control arms (n = 52). Girls and mothers had separate and unique log-in names and passwords, and each completed a pretest and posttest survey online. Following pretest measurement, intervention-arm dyads received, via email, a username and password to interact with a 9-session web-based substance use prevention program at home and at times convenient to them. Delivered by voice-over narration, animated graphics, and games, session content involved skill demonstrations and interactive exercises that required the joint participation of mothers and daughters. Mother-daughter dyads were asked to complete one session per week. Each session lasted approximately 45 minutes. The average length of time between baseline and post-intervention survey completion was 6.25 months (SD = 2.25; Range = 5.5).
Control-arm dyads received no intervention. Intervention participants could not access post-intervention measures unless they completed all program sessions. Posttest data collection occurred approximately 1 year after pretest. Each participant received incentives of gift certificates (valued at $20 and $25 respectively at the two measurement occasions) for completing study measures.
Intervention
The substance use prevention program (Table 1) was guided by family interaction theory [3]. Positing that parent-child dynamics during pre- and early-adolescent years play a significant role to adolescent substance use, family interaction theory suggests that strong parent-child communication, appropriate parental monitoring, high levels of parental involvement, and high levels of parent-child communication can buffer against peer and psychological risks and decrease adolescent substance use. Aiming to preventing girls' substance use through enhancing mother-daughter interactions, the program helped mothers establish clear rules about consequences for substance use, manage conflict, monitor their daughters' behavior and activities, improve their children's self-esteem, and gain competency in empathizing with their daughters and assisting them in coping with stress. At the same time, the program assisted girls to manage stress and interpersonal conflict, build refusal skills, enhance self-efficacy, increase their social supports and prosocial activities, and maintain close relationships with their mothers.
Table 1.
Session Theme | Sample Activity |
---|---|
1. Mother-daughter relationship |
|
2. Conflict management |
|
3. Substance use opportunities |
|
4. Body image |
|
5. Mood management |
|
6. Stress management |
|
7. Problem solving |
|
8. Social influences |
|
9. Self-efficacy |
|
Measures
Demographic data were obtained from girls and mothers. At pretest and posttest, girls reported their use of alcohol, cigarettes, marijuana, and prescription drugs for non-medical purpose in the past 30 days, and their intentions in engaging in substance use in the future. Girls also completed measures concerning depression (α = 0.71-0.89) [4], self-efficacy (α = 0.95) [5], refusal skills (α = 0.71-0.89) [6], mother-daughter closeness (α = 0.91) [7], mother-daughter communication (α = 0.80-0.84) [8], maternal monitoring (α = 0.88) [9], and family rules against substance use (α = 0.77-0.83) [10]. All survey instruments were administered in English.
Results
Two mother-daughter dyads attrited from each arm, and 104 dyads (54 intervention and 50 control) successfully completed both pretest and posttest measures. At pretest, 41.3% (n = 43) of girls had used alcohol, 6.7% (n = 7) cigarettes, 3.8% (n = 4) marijuana, and 21.1% (n = 22) illicit prescription drugs in the past 12 months. No demographic differences were found between intervention and control arms at pretest (Table 2). Generalized estimating equations (GEE) tested between-arm differences for repeated measures outcome variables. Relative to control-arm girls, at posttest, intervention-arm girls reported less depressed mood (p = .045), greater self-efficacy (p = .002), better refusal skills (p = .014), higher levels of mother-daughter closeness (p = .0001), improved mother-daughter communication (p = .03), greater maternal monitoring (p = .0003), and more family rules against substance use (p = .0004). Intervention-arm girls also reported fewer instances of using alcohol (p = .016), marijuana (p = .009), and prescription drugs for non-medical purposes (p = .017), and expressed lower intentions to use substances in the future (p = .004).
Table 2.
Baseline | Posttest | Intervention by time interaction effect | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control (n = 50) |
Intervention (n = 54) |
Control (n = 50) |
Intervention (n = 54) |
Wald χ2 | P | |
Demographic Variables | ||||||
Girl's age, y, mean (SD) | 13.25 (0.94) | 12.99 (0.96) | .17d | |||
Mother's age, y, mean (SD) | 41.06 (7.10) | 39.42 (6.48) | .22d | |||
Foreign-born girls, % | 14.0 | 20.4 | .45e | |||
Foreign-born mothers, % | 64.0 | 55.6 | .53e | |||
Single parent, % | 18.0 | 13.0 | .48e | |||
Mothers' highest education, % | .50e | |||||
High school | 32.0 | 22.2 | ||||
College | 40.0 | 24.6 | ||||
Graduate school | 28.0 | 35.2 | ||||
Outcome Variablesa | ||||||
Depression (SE)b | 1.62 (0.57) | 1.41 (0.88) | 1.68 (0.71) | 1.26 (0.73) | 3.97 | .045 |
Self-efficacy (SE) | 3.46 (0.71) | 3.54 (0.69) | 3.24 (0.92) | 3.78 (0.50) | 9.73 | .002 |
Refusal skills (SE) | 3.52 (0.79) | 3.54 (0.67) | 3.34 (0.75) | 3.70 (0.57) | 6.02 | .014 |
Mother-daughter closeness (SE) | 2.88 (1.15) | 3.02 (1.04) | 2.70 (1.17) | 3.41 (0.88) | 15.51 | .0001 |
Mother-daughter communication (SE) | 3.27 (2.40) | 3.50 (2.04) | 2.85 (1.80) | 3.61 (2.03) | 4.62 | .03 |
Maternal monitoring (SE) | 4.39 (0.87) | 4.39 (0.72) | 4.22 (0.84) | 4.67 (0.58) | 13.00 | .0003 |
Family rules (SE) | 1.97 (1.62) | 1.92 (1.62) | 1.83 (1.62) | 2.62 (1.32) | 12.48 | .0004 |
30-Day Substance Use (SE)c | ||||||
Alcohol | 0.26 (0.78) | 0.06 (0.23) | 0.74 (1.92) | 0.07 (0.33) | 5.85 | .016 |
Cigarettes | 0.06 (0.31) | 0.13 (0.58) | 1.84 (10.23) | 0.02 (0.14) | 3.54 | .06 |
Marijuana | 0.004 (0.02) | 0.001 (0.01) | 0.01 (0.03) | 0 (0.00) | 6.84 | .009 |
Prescription drugs | 0.03 (0.13) | 0.06 (0.25) | 0.14 (0.61) | 0.01 (0.03) | 5.73 | .017 |
Intention to use in the future (SE) | 3.04 (2.80) | 2.70 (2.14) | 3.70 (3.39) | 2.11 (2.05) | 8.10 | .004 |
Note. Wald χ2 and P values were derived using the generalized estimating equation (GEE) models. Adjusting for within-subject model correlations, GEE models included outcomes as the dependent variables, and group assignment, time and interaction of the two variables as independent variables. Frequency of substance use in the past 30 days was analyzed through log link by specifying the Poisson distribution in the GEE. Linear GEE models were used to analyze all other outcome variables. We assessed whether including the demographic variables (i.e. girl's age, mother's age, girls' and mothers' foreign-born status, mother's education, and household composition) would change the coefficient of the interaction term by more than 10%. No confounding was found so these variables were not included.
Except as noted, scores are from 5-point scales; higher scores are better.
Scores are from 5-point scales; lower scores are better.
Occasions of use in the past 30 days.
Using the t test.
Using the χ2 test.
Discussion
This is the first randomized controlled trial that examines the efficacy of a family-oriented substance use prevention program for Asian-American adolescent girls. Facilitated by online recruitment, the web-based program reached a substantial number of Asian-American participants in a relatively short period. Girls were largely second-generation Asian Americans from socioeconomically advantaged backgrounds. Participants involved in the intervention improved on measures of their psychological states, substance use prevention skills, and maternal relationships. These girls also reported more parental monitoring and rules against substance use. Most important, intervention-arm girls reported less substances use than their control-arm counterparts.
Study findings should be interpreted with caution. The program was delivered in English, and was inaccessible to non-English-speaking participants. Findings are most salient for second-generation, acculturated Asian-American girls. That participating families were required to have a computer to access the computerized program and were mostly recruited online further limited the generalizability of study findings. Lastly, the program content was not designed expressly for Asian Americans and lacked cultural specificity. Given that substance use is a culturally and contextually dependent behavior, culturally relevant programs that enhance the content relevance for Asian-American youth warrant further development and testing.
Acknowledgments
The research originated from Columbia University in New York, NY. The study reported in this paper was funded by grant DA17721 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Contributor Information
Lin Fang, The University of Toronto, Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, 246 Bloor Street W., Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada.
Steven P. Schinke, Columbia University School of Social Work, 1255 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY 10027.
Kristin C. A. Cole, Columbia University School of Social Work, 1255 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY 10027
References
- 1.Hahm HC, Lahiff M, Guterman NB. Asian American adolescents' acculturation, binge drinking, and alcohol- and tobacco-using peers. Journal of Community Psychology. 2004;32:295–308. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Huey SJ, Polo AJ. Evidence-based psychosocial treatments for ethnic minority youth. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology. 2008;37(1):262–301. doi: 10.1080/15374410701820174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Brook JS, Brook DW, Gordon AS, et al. The psychosocial etiology of adolescent drug use: A family interactional approach. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs. 1990;116:111–267. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kovacs M. Children's Depression Inventory (CDI) Los Angeles, CA: WPS/Western Psychological Services; 1992. [Google Scholar]
- 5.DiClemente CC, Prochaska JO, Gibertini M. Self-efficacy and the stages of self-change of smoking. Cognitive Therapy and Research. 1985;9:181–200. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Macaulay AP, Griffin KW, Botvin GJ. Initial internal reliability and descriptive statistics for a brief assessment tool for the Life Skills Training drug-abuse prevention program. Psychological Reports. 2002;91(2):459–462. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2002.91.2.459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Armsden G, Greenberg M. The inventory of parent and peer attachment: Individual differences and their relationship to psychological well-being in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 1987;16(5):427–454. doi: 10.1007/BF02202939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Melby JN, Conger RD, Book R, et al. The Iowa Family Interaction Rating Scales. 5th. Ames, IA: Institute for Social and Behavioral Research, Iowa State University at Ames; 1998. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Li X, Feigelman S, Stanton B. Perceived parental monitoring and health risk behaviors among urban low-income African-American children and adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2000;27(1):43–48. doi: 10.1016/s1054-139x(99)00077-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Komro K, Perry C, Veblen-Mortenson S, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and evaluation of a home-based program for alcohol use prevention among urban youth: The “Slick Tracy Home Team Program”. The Journal of Primary Prevention. 2006;27(2):135–154. doi: 10.1007/s10935-005-0029-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]