Skip to main content
PMC home page
Nature Portfolio logoLink to Nature Portfolio
. 2010 Aug;1(5):1–7. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1057

Controlling spins in adsorbed molecules by a chemical switch

Christian Wäckerlin 1,*, Dorota Chylarecka 1,*, Armin Kleibert 2, Kathrin Müller 1,†, Cristian Iacovita 3, Frithjof Nolting 2, Thomas A Jung 1,b, Nirmalya Ballav 1,a
PMCID: PMC2964454  PMID: 20975713

Abstract

The development of chemical systems with switchable molecular spins could lead to the architecture of materials with controllable magnetic or spintronic properties. Here, we present conclusive evidence that the spin of an organometallic molecule coupled to a ferromagnetic substrate can be switched between magnetic off and on states by a chemical stimulus. This is achieved by nitric oxide (NO) functioning as an axial ligand of cobalt(II)tetraphenylporphyrin (CoTPP) ferromagnetically coupled to nickel thin-film (Ni(001)). On NO addition, the coordination sphere of Co2+ is modified and a NO–CoTPP nitrosyl complex is formed, which corresponds to an off state of the Co spin. Thermal dissociation of NO from the nitrosyl complex restores the on state of the Co spin. The NO-induced reversible off–on switching of surface-adsorbed molecular spins observed here is attributed to a spin trans effect.

Inline graphic Chemical systems with switchable molecular spins could allow the development of materials with controllable spintronic properties. Here, the authors show that nitric oxide coordination to cobalt(II)tetraphenylporphyrin on a nickel surface, followed by thermal dissociation, leads to off-on spin switching.

Planar organometallic complexes with extended π-conjugation, for example, metalloporphyrins and metallophthalocyanines, have an indispensable role in controlling a wide range of functionalities: chemical reactivity (in biochemistry), optical absorbance (in dyes), optoelectronic conductance (in light harvesting chromophores), as well as the ability to function as electron donors or acceptors (in gas sensors and organic semiconductor devices)1. This degree of control is achieved by modifying the coordination of the central metal ion through interaction with its environment, for example, by an external chemical stimulus, as exemplified in nature by the regulation of Fe-porphyrin-to-oxygen affinity within the haemoglobin tetramer2,3. Recently, a similar effect has been implemented at surfaces in which the electronic surface-molecular interaction has been controlled by chemical stimuli4,5,6. Furthermore, metalloporphyrins containing unpaired spins have been shown to exhibit exchange coupling to magnetic substrates7,8,9,10,11,12. In view of spintronics13,14, which has been predominantly emerging for thin-film devices such as spin valves and transistors, it comprises a challenge to control single molecular spins within their specific environment at the spintronic interface. Notably, the molecular spin state for inorganic complexes/polymers in bulk can be controlled by external factors such as temperature, pressure and photon-induced excitation15,16,17,18.

Molecules containing unpaired spins and molecular magnets bearing several coupled magnetic atoms19 have recently received increasing attention. Unpaired electron spins in a molecule offer a wide range of options towards the tuning of their coupling with the environment. The structure and properties of such molecules can be initially architectured through synthesis and can be further modified by chemical reactions. X-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD) spectroscopy20,21 allows for the highly sensitive determination of the magnetization of spin systems assembled at surfaces with elemental and chemical specificity. The XMCD technique has also been used to assess the magnetization of adsorbed metalloporphyrin spin systems with respect to ferromagnetic substrates7,8,9,10,11.

In this article, we demonstrate that the spin of a metalloporphyrin molecule, namely cobalt(II)tetraphenylporphyrin (CoTPP), is magnetically coupled to a ferromagnetic substrate (here nickel (Ni(001))) and can be controlled by nitric oxide (NO) functioning as a chemical stimulus. A reversible off–on switching process of the molecular spin, induced by NO, in the presence of the remanent magnetization of the Ni substrate is shown. Addition of NO supersedes the Co–Ni magnetoelectronic interaction by the formation of a NO–CoTPP nitrosyl complex22,23, which corresponds to the off state of the Co spin in CoTPP. Thermal dissociation of NO from the nitrosyl complex restores the initial Co–Ni magnetoelectronic interaction and leads to the on state of the Co spin in CoTPP. Thereby, this work provides an example of a chemical switch affecting the spin in surface-adsorbed molecules and presents a case for the spin trans effect in analogy to the well-established 'trans effect'22,23,24. Using stimuli to control single atomic25 and molecular spins at interfaces and determining their coupling with the environment is of eminent interest in the field of quantum information26.

Results

Design of the magnetic interface

A cobalt-porphyrin, CoTPP (see Fig. 1a; top panel), has been chosen as a magnetic molecule characterized by one unpaired electron (S=½; magnetic moment M (static)=1.73 μB, M (effective)=1.92 μB)27. On the basis of its architecture and properties, this molecule is expected to be affected by the up or down magnetization of the ferromagnetic Ni substrate8. Atomically clean Ni substrates were prepared by deposition of thin films (~20 monolayers (MLs)) onto clean Cu(001) single crystals in ultrahigh vacuum. About 1 ML of CoTPP molecules was then evaporated onto the freshly prepared non-magnetized Ni(001) substrates kept at room temperature. On such prepared samples the magnetization of the different elemental species, that is, Co and Ni, has been determined by the element-specific XMCD technique20 (see Fig. 1a; bottom panel).

Figure 1. Magnetic ordering of substrate (Ni) and organic adsorbate (CoTPP) with respect to the NO-induced switching.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

In all spectra, 'a.u.' represents arbitrary units. (a) Chemical structure of the CoTPP molecule (top) and schematic view of the XMCD experiment (bottom). (b) Chemical identification of Co and Ni: L-edges X-ray absorption spectra of Co (CoTPP, photon energy range: 765–815 eV) and Ni (substrate, photon energy range: 835–885 eV) acquired with circularly polarized X-ray light from a synchrotron source with opposite helicities (μ+ and μ−). The difference in X-ray absorption for the opposite helicities (dichroism) reveals the magnetization of the observed chemical species. (c) Spin-switching sequence from left to right as indicated by arrows: L-edges XMCD spectra of Co (top panels) and Ni (bottom panels) recorded on the CoTPP/Ni(001) system after the initial preparation of molecular adlayers (left), after NO addition (centre) and on temperature-induced NO desorption (right). The directions of the remanent substrate magnetization M are indicated by grey arrows to the left of each spectrum. Ferromagnetic ordering of molecular spins with respect to the substrate is observed initially. Reversible 'off–on' switching of Co magnetization is observed with progressing NO addition and temperature-induced NO desorption.

XMCD spectroscopy

X-ray absorption spectra of circularly polarized synchrotron light with opposite helicities (μ+ and μ−) are presented in Figure 1b. They clearly show a difference in absorption, that is, magnetic circular dichroism, at L2 and L3 absorption edges of both Co (top) and Ni (bottom). In the dichroic spectra, both the magnetic molecule (Co; Fig. 1c; top left panel initial) and the substrate (Ni; Fig. 1c; bottom left panel initial) show a magnetization, as characterized by the two peaks at photon energies corresponding to the L2 and L3 edges. A ferromagnetic coupling between CoTPP molecules and the Ni substrate is clearly identified by the same sign of the L2 and L3 dichroic signals in the respective spectra. Such ferromagnetic coupling has also been observed for similar molecules with different central metal atoms on various substrates7,8,9. Following numerical calculations based on density functional theory, this coupling occurs by superexchange through nitrogen atoms of the porphyrin ring for these observations8,28,29.

To investigate the effect of a reaction with a chemical stimulus on the magnetization of CoTPP adsorbed on the Ni substrate, the CoTPP/Ni system was exposed to NO gas at room temperature. After the NO exposure, the initially well-detectable Co magnetization (Fig. 1c; initial) cannot be detected by XMCD anymore (Fig. 1c; '+NO). This behaviour is observed irrespective of the substrate magnetization and provides clear evidence that the magnetization of Co in CoTPP is switched off—an effect that goes far beyond earlier observations7,8,21 and allows for the switching of individual molecular spins. As expected for a thin film, the Ni substrate magnetization was only marginally affected by the NO adsorption. We assign the off state of the molecular spin to the pairing of the initially unpaired Co spin, with the unpaired spin supplied by NO in the formation of a NO–CoTPP complex22,23,30 as discussed further below.

To probe the reversibility of the process the sample temperature was temporarily increased to ~615 K, leading to the removal of NO from the NO–CoTPP complex. This implies the reactivation of the Co spin (S=½) and the regeneration of the ferromagnetic coupling between CoTPP and Ni as clearly reflected in the XMCD spectra (Fig. 1c; '−NO), that is, the Co spin system was switched on again. Consequently, the ferromagnetic coupling of Co magnetic moment to the Ni substrate magnetization is reestablished, as confirmed by the respective dichroic signals (Fig. 1c; '−NO).

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

To assess the influence of NO ligation on the chemical species involved and on the electronic interaction between CoTPP and Ni, we have employed X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and measured Co2p XP spectra at various stages of the experiment (Fig. 2a). For a monolayer of CoTPP on Ni, the Co2p3/2 XPS signal exhibits a multiplet spectral feature, on which the main peak was observed at ~778.2 eV resembling an outermost (dz2)1-open-shell structure (compare CoTPP/Ag(111) system in Flechtner et al.6). Reaction with NO causes two major changes in the Co2p3/2 XPS signal. First, the multiplet spectral feature is replaced by a single peak, which is the expected behaviour for Co, assuming an outermost (dz2)2-closed-shell electronic structure. Second, the main peak position shifts from ~778.2 to ~780.2 eV—the latter value also being observed for the main Co2p3/2 peak of CoTPP in multilayers (see Flechtner et al.6). This behaviour suggests the suppression of the Co–Ni interaction by the stronger NO–Co interaction and correlates the observed chemical shift in XPS to a downshift of the unoccupied dz2 spin level after bonding with NO. On thermal treatment of the NO–CoTPP–Ni system the multiplet feature of the Co2p3/2 XPS signal, characterized by the main peak at ~778.2 eV, is observed again, which proves the NO dissociation from the nitrosyl complex—consistent with an earlier report on the electronic coupling of the NO–CoTPP–Ag system6. Notably, in our system, both the electronic coupling and the ad-molecular magnetization respond simultaneously to NO addition and removal.

Figure 2. Probing electronic interaction and visualizing molecules on the surface.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(a) Co2p3/2 XP spectra (raw data and fitted curves) of CoTPP molecules (~1 ML) on Ni(001) before NO exposure (black line), after NO exposure (red line) and on desorption of NO (blue line). The spectral evolution reflects the NO-induced reversible switching of the Co oxidation state and the modified electronic interaction between CoTPP molecules and the Ni surface. Different binding energy positions of the Co2p3/2 XPS signal have been marked by dotted lines; 'a.u.' refers to arbitrary units. (b) Molecular adsorption on a reactive magnetic substrate: room temperature STM image showing the surface morphology of Ni(001) (150 nm × 150 nm; the size corresponding to one CoTPP molecule is depicted by the black square within the dotted circle). (c) Adsorption of CoTPP molecules on the Ni(001) surface (50 nm × 50 nm), where CoTPP is recognized by a four-leaf clover shape in symmetric and planar adsorption geometry while asymmetric conformations can also be detected38. (d) High-resolution STM: As a guide to the eye, molecular cartoons of CoTPP have been inserted (5 nm × 5 nm). Tunnelling parameters: I=0.07 nA, U=0.68 V (b) and I=0.05 nA, U=1.05 V (c, d).

Scanning tunnelling microscopy

To further elucidate the nature of the chemical switching effect, it is necessary to study the adsorption geometry of the CoTPP molecules on Ni(001). Our scanning tunnelling microscopy (STM) data (Fig. 2b–d) show that the Ni(001) surface exhibits extended terraces that are virtually free of point defects and that CoTPP molecules adsorb spatially in a random distribution on the surface. This is due to a considerable surface-molecular interaction limiting the diffusion length during the deposition process, which then hinders the frequently observed self-assembly on metallic substrates31,32. This observation is in line with a recent report on the Mn-porphyrin/Co(001) system showing limited or no self-assembly11. High-resolution STM images of the CoTPP molecules on Ni(001) (Fig. 2d) reveal a planar orientation on the surface. A quasi-planar orientation has also been found by means of near-edge X-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy for similar magnetic molecule–substrate interfaces, for example, Mn-porphyrin/Co(001), Fe-porphyrin/Co(001) and Fe-porphyrin/Ni(001)7,8. Density functional theory calculations have shown that magnetic exchange coupling requires the metalloporphyrin molecule: (i) in a planar orientation with the metal ion–4N moiety (see 'Co–4N' in Fig. 3a) on the surface and (ii) in a certain distance from the magnetic substrate8,28,29.

Figure 3. Reversible off–on switching of a molecular spin.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(a) A scheme of the NO–CoTPP complex depicting the involvement of the relevant orbitals. The four green N atoms from the pyrrole moieties of the porphyrin represent the coordination with the Co ion and the dashed lines indicate the Co–4N plane that gets a pyramidal distortion on nitrosyl complex formation. (b) The electronic levels involved in the chemical reaction between NO acting as a π-ligand and CoTPP. Molecular orbital diagrams (the dashed vertical arrow indicates the energy axis, E) of CoTPP (d7 configuration: (dxz)2(dyz)2(dxy)2(dz2)1 (dx2−y2)0 adapted from Wayland et al.34 and Kozuka and Nakamoto35) and NO (configuration: (σ)2(πa)2(πb)2(πa*)1(πb*)0 adapted from Huheey et al.23) showing the presence of unpaired electrons in both CoTPP (dz2) and NO (πa*). On formation of the NO–CoTPP complex (grey arrow), the unpaired spin of CoTPP, which is responsible for the molecular magnetism, is paired up with the unpaired spin supplied by NO in the mixed bonding orbital (highest occupied molecular orbital, HOMO). Consequently, the mixed antibonding orbital (lowest unoccupied molecular orbital, LUMO) is lifted above the Fermi level (EF) of the Ni substrate. Note that the energy levels of the orbitals within the blue dotted circle have been adapted from the literature: Wayland et al.34 and Kozuka and Nakamoto35 for the HOMO/LUMO of the NO–CoTPP complex and Flechtner et al.6 for EF. α and β represent orbital mixing coefficients of dz2 and πa*, respectively. (c) Schematic representation of the switching process: switching on (top)—the CoTPP molecule is ferromagnetically coupled to the Ni substrate and the Co magnetic moment follows the substrate (Ni) magnetization; switching off (bottom)—on addition of NO, CoTPP (S=½) forms the NO–CoTPP complex (S=0) and the spin state of NO–CoTPP remains the same, irrespective of the Ni magnetization. Reversibility is shown by the reaction arrows indicating the chemical reaction with NO and the dissociation of NO.

In our STM data, we observe some bright spots (Fig. 2c) that correspond to CoTPP molecules adsorbed on top of the first (incomplete) molecular layer. Molecules in the second layer do not have contact with the Ni substrate and reside comparably far above the surface. Thus, not every CoTPP molecule on our samples undergoes ferromagnetic exchange coupling with the Ni(001) substrate. However, XPS data (Fig. 2a) support that the vast majority of CoTPP molecules electronically interact with the Ni(001) substrate. Furthermore, in the STM overview of clean Ni(001) (cf. Fig. 2b), the small black square drawn within the dotted circle represents the corresponding size of one CoTPP molecule. From the molecular dimensions and the step density observed in the STM data, we estimate an upper limit of ~5 to 10% of the molecules (at a coverage of ~1ML CoTPP), which can reside at low-symmetry sites, for example, step edges. As a result, most of the CoTPP molecules are adsorbed at high-symmetry sites and in planar orientation (Fig. 2c and 2d) and are thereby expected to contribute to the magnetic interaction and to respond well to the spin switching events by NO adsorption/desorption, as observed in the XMCD data (see Fig. 1c).

Discussion

On the basis of the XPS identification of the Co species and the STM observation of a predominantly planar orientation of the molecules, the NO-induced reversible switching between CoTPP and Ni can be attributed to the trans effect6,22,23,24. In analogy to the elegant postulate reported in Flechtner et al.6 describing the role of the trans effect in interfacial coordination chemistry, the NO ligand coordinating in trans position controls the coupling to a second ligand (Ni substrate) acting on the same metalloporphyrin (CoTPP). Bonding of NO with the Co ion presumably changes the 'Co–4N' planar geometry (see Fig. 3a) such that the Co ion is pulled out of the plane towards the NO, whereby the overlap with Ni orbitals is reduced—which assists the switching event. The 'trans effect is frequently used to control chemical reactivity or electron affinity through ligands22,23,24 and, as demonstrated here, simultaneously controls the chemical/electronic coupling and the spin state.

The magnetic properties, namely the Co magnetization during the switching process that depends on the Ni substrate magnetization direction, can be uniquely probed for this system by the element-specific XMCD technique. The quenching of the Co XMCD signal observed in our experiments is identified as a consequence of the pairing of the originally unpaired spin in the dz2 orbital on formation of the NO–CoTPP complex. This chemically stimulated process directly affects the Co spin system and the coupling to the substrate, as can be seen from the discussion of the molecular levels (Fig. 3b) involved: the highest occupied molecular orbital of the NO–CoTPP complex33,34,35 originates from the interaction of singly occupied molecular orbitals of CoTPP (dz2)34,35 and NO (π*)23, as schematically shown in Figure 3a,b.

On heating the sample, NO dissociates from the NO–CoTPP complex, leaving the CoTPP molecule with an unpaired spin and reestablishing the magnetoelectronic association with the Ni substrate. The dichroic signal at ~778.5 eV (Fig. 1c; top right panel) and the Co XPS data (Fig. 2a; blue line) clearly indicate that the CoTPP molecules remain intact after the temperature-induced dissociation of NO. A scheme for the NO-induced reversible switching of the magnetic response of CoTPP coupled to a ferromagnetic Ni substrate is presented in Figure 3c. Two different mechanisms can be considered: (i) NO reacts with CoTPP from the top and forms the NO–CoTPP complex or (ii) the Ni substrate reacts with NO and consequently affects the CoTPP–Ni interaction. To provide decisive evidence towards mechanism (i) or (ii), we have performed two additional experiments. First, a bare Ni(001) surface was exposed to ~6,000 L (Langmuir) of NO and was subsequently annealed at ~615 K. The O1s (a) and N1s (b) XPS signals (see Fig. 4) remain essentially unchanged on annealing. The shoulder observed at higher binding energies before annealing is assigned to physisorbed species desorbing from the surface on annealing. On the basis of the earlier reported observation of NO dissociation on Ni(001), even at room temperature36, the two peaks are attributed to Ni–N and Ni–O species, which remain chemisorbed at the annealing temperatures used in our experiment.

Figure 4. Effect of NO coadsorption on Ni(001).

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

XPS data recorded on a Ni(001) surface after exposure of ~6,000 L NO. The measurements were taken before (blue) and after (red) annealing at ~615 K. The O1s (a) and N1s (b) XP spectra clearly show that only the physisorbed NO is removed after annealing. The N/O intensity ratio is reduced after heating by a negligible extent, which suggests that the Ni(001) surface remained covered with nitrogen- and oxygen containing species even after annealing. We tentatively assign these species to chemisorbed Ni–oxygen/Ni–nitrogen and (NO)x. 'a.u.' represents arbitrary units.

In the second experiment, CoTPP (~1 ML) was deposited onto a Ni(001) surface preexposed to NO (~6,000 L). Subsequently, this system was annealed at ~615 K. Interestingly, the Co2p XPS data exhibited almost identical peak positions (Co2p3/2 ~780.2 eV) before and after this annealing procedure (see Fig. 5), which indicates that CoTPP remains electronically decoupled from the Ni substrate, that is, the preexposure of NO modifies the Ni(001) substrate such that no NO-induced reversibility can be observed in this temperature window. These results confirm that our experiments on the NO-induced switching are not significantly determined/affected by side reactions of NO on the bare fraction of the Ni substrate (<20%; see Fig. 2b), as the electronic and ferromagnetic exchange coupling between CoTPP and Ni is restored after annealing at ~615 K (see Figs 1c and 2a). Thus, the reported experiments are all in agreement with mechanism (i) and are consistent with the involvement of the trans effect. Note that the observation of ligand-induced spin switching of porphyrins is not restricted to ferromagnetic substrates, and we expect that this work can be extended to antiferromagnetic or diamagnetic (for example, Cu(100)) substrates as well, using sufficiently high external magnetic fields at low temperature, for example, 6 T and 8 K21. The trans effect, as used to control the site-specific affinity of porphyrins or phthalocyanines to chemical reactants, is used in this study to control the spin localized at a central metal ion, and thereby provides the case for a spin trans effect.

Figure 5. Role of the trans effect in the observed reversibility.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

About 1 ML of CoTPP was evaporated onto a Ni(001) surface that was previously exposed to ~6,000 L of NO to prepare a CoTPP/NO/Ni(001) system. The system was subsequently annealed at ~615 K, and Co2p XP spectra were recorded before and after annealing. Before annealing, the Co2p3/2 peak at ~780.2 eV indicates that there is no electronic interaction between CoTPP and Ni. Interestingly, even after annealing, the CoTPP remained electronically decoupled from the Ni. This control experiment shows that CoTPP on preexposed NO/Ni(001) cannot exhibit reversibility of the magnetoelectronic interaction between CoTPP and Ni (see Figs 1c and 2a). Thereby, the reversibility observed in our main experiment is attributed to gaseous NO species coordinating to the CoTPP adlayer through the trans effect6. 'a.u.' represents arbitrary units.

Because of the large body of knowledge about porphyrins and phthalocyanines1, and their variability established in coordination chemistry, the spin trans effect is expected to proceed beyond the case presented here. Spin switching systems on the basis of the presented architecture are expected to be demonstrated using other chemical stimuli (for example, CO), using modified molecular spin systems (for example, metallophthalocyanines), and also for the case of antiferromagnetic exchange coupling10,11. Considering the involvement of the chromophoric group in these molecules, the use of other stimuli such as light is foreseeable. By exploiting a pump-and-probe approach it might become possible to study spin dynamics in surface-supported chemical reactions using the XMCD technique20.

The reversible off–on switching of the electron spin in a surface-supported paramagnetic molecule presented here suggests further studies on organic spintronic interfaces in conjunction with transport measurements. In view of the rapidly advancing capabilities to induce events on the level of single atoms and molecules by scanning probe microscopy, it is anticipated that surface-supported magnetic molecules can be individually switched. The behaviour of such model systems, not only as isolated spin systems and in dependence of their coupling to the substrate/environment but also as elements of quantum-coupled systems, may provide a new basis for experimental insight into quantum behaviour at further increased complexity.

Methods

Sample preparation and characterization

All experiments were performed in ultrahigh vacuum. Cu(001) single crystals (MaTecK GmbH) were cleaned by repeated Ar+ sputtering/annealing cycles and the impurity level was monitored by recording C1s, O1s, N1s and Ni2p XPS signals. Ni (MaTecK GmbH) thin films (~20 MLs, ~3.5 nm) were deposited by means of electron-beam evaporation in a two-step procedure onto clean Cu(001) single crystals11. In the first step, ~10 MLs of Ni were evaporated on Cu(001) kept at room temperature, which provided a sufficient barrier to prevent the Cu atoms from diffusion across the Ni layers. After ~30 min of annealing at ~530 K, another ~10 MLs of Ni were deposited while keeping the sample at ~460 K to obtain atomically flat terraces. During these evaporation steps, the deposition rate was monitored by a quartz crystal microbalance. After deposition of ~20 MLs of Ni on Cu(001), the thin-film substrate was investigated by XPS and low-energy electron diffraction studies to assure that no contamination of the film occurred and that the growing film shows the fcc(001) structure11. CoTPP (Sigma-Aldrich) molecules were evaporated (~1 ML) onto a freshly prepared non-magnetized Ni(001) substrate kept at room temperature. The deposition rate was monitored by a quartz crystal microbalance and the molecular coverage on the surface was calibrated by combined XPS and STM measurements. STM images were taken in constant-current mode at room temperature with a Pt/Ir tip and the bias voltages were referred to the grounded sample. The prepared samples were transported to the surfaces/interfaces microscopy (SIM) beamline of the Swiss Light Source (SLS) using a vacuum suitcase (base pressure in the order of ~7.5×10−11 Torr), that is, without breaking the vacuum.

XMCD measurements

An external magnetic field of ~125 mT was applied perpendicular to the surface plane of the CoTPP/Ni(001) sample before the XMCD measurements to assure single-domain magnetization of the Ni film along the easy axis (out-of-plane)8. The L-edges absorption spectra for both Co and Ni were recorded at normal incidence in total electron yield mode without externally applied magnetic field, that is, in the remanent magnetization of the Ni substrate. The SLS-SIM beamline provides high brilliance X-ray light in the energy range of 130–2,000 eV from two elliptical twin undulators, which permit switching of the photon helicity optically within a few seconds37. All spectra were recorded at room temperature and normalized to the incident photon flux. The Ni magnetization was reproducibly reversed by inverting the externally applied magnetic field. XMCD data taken at the SLS-SIM beamline were complemented by XPS/STM measurements using the same sample preparation conditions.

NO dosing and heating

The CoTPP/Ni(001) system was exposed to ~6,000 L of NO (exposure time ~17 min) in the XMCD chamber at room temperature. The sample was subsequently heated to ~615 K to remove NO from the NO–CoTPP complex. Notably, our experiments suggest that cooling the sample to ~100 K reduces the required NO exposure to a considerable extent, whereas the off–on electronic switching events can still be consistently observed by the XPS measurements.

Author contributions

N.B. planned the study and the experimental sessions. C.W., D.C. and N.B. conducted most of the experiments, analysed the data and prepared the figures for the paper. A.K., K.M., C.I. and F.N. provided essential assistance during the beamtime experiments. A.K. and F.N. supervised and checked the XMCD experiments and the analysis. N.B. and T.A.J. supervised and checked the XPS, STM and XAS experiments; and they also assembled the paper and references with inputs from the coauthors.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Wäckerlin, C. et al. Controlling spins in adsorbed molecules by a chemical switch. Nat. Commun. 1:61 doi: 10.1038/ncomms1057 (2010).

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge financial supports from the Swiss National Science Foundation; National Center of Competence in Research, and Research Equipment Funding, Switzerland; and from the European Union through the Marie Curie Research Training Network PRAIRIES (MRTN-CT-2006-035810). N.B. thanks the Holcim Foundation for the Advancement of Scientific Research, Switzerland for a research scholarship. A part of this study has been conducted at the SLS-SIM beamline, Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, Switzerland. The authors thank Rolf Schelldorfer and Andrea Steger for technical support; Arantxa Fraile-Rodriguez for providing help during beamtimes at SLS; Harald Rossmann for assistance on XPS experiments; and Izabela Czekaj for the molecular scheme of CoTPP.

References

  1. Khadis K. M., Smith K. M. & Guilard R. (eds) in The Porphyrin Handbook (Academic Press, Vol. 1–10 (1999) and Vol. 11–20 (2003)). [Google Scholar]
  2. Perutz M. F. Stereochemistry of cooperative effects of haemoglobin: haem-haem interaction and the problem of allostery. Nature 228, 726–734 (1970). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berg J. M., Tymoczko J. L. & Stryer L. Biochemistry, 5th edn (W. H. Freeman and Company, 2002). [Google Scholar]
  4. Williams F. J., Vaughan O. P. H., Knox K. J., Bampos N. & Lambert R. M. First observation of capping/uncapping by a ligand of a Zn porphyrin adsorbed on Ag(100). Chem. Commun. 1688–1689 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Vaughan O. P. H., Williams F. J., Bampos N. & Lambert R. M. A chemically switchable molecular pinwheel. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45, 3779–3781 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Flechtner K., Kretschmann A., Steinrück H.-P. & Gottfried J. M. NO-induced reversible switching of the electronic interaction between a porphyrin-coordinated cobalt ion and a silver surface. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 12110–12111 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Scheybal A., Ramsvik T., Bertschinger R., Putero M., Nolting F. & Jung T. A. Induced magnetic ordering in a molecular monolayer. Chem. Phys. Lett. 411, 214–220 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  8. Wende H. et al. Substrate-induced magnetic ordering and switching of iron porphyrin molecules. Nat. Mater. 6, 516–520 (2007) [Gatteschi, D. News and Views; Molecular magnets: a coupling powered by nature. Nat. Mater. 6, 471–72 (2007)]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bernien M. et al. Fe-porphyrin monolayers on ferromagnetic substrates: electronic structure and magnetic coupling strength. Phys. Rev. B. 76, 214406 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  10. Bernien M. et al. Tailoring the nature of magnetic coupling of Fe-porphyrin molecules to ferromagnetic substrates. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 047202 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chylarecka D. et al. Self-assembly and superexchange coupling of magnetic molecules on oxygen-reconstructed ferromagnetic thin film. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 1, 1408–1413 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  12. Iacovita C. et al. Visualizing the spin of individual cobalt-phthalocyanine molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 116602 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rocha A. R., Garcia-Suarez V. M., Bailey S. W., Lambert C. J., Ferrer J. & Sanvito S. Towards molecular spintronics. Nat. Mater. 4, 335–339 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dediu V. A., Hueso L. E., Bergenti I. & Taliani C. Spin routes in organic semiconductors. Nat. Mater. 8, 707–716 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gütlich P. & Goodwin H. A. (eds). Topics in Current Chemistry Series: Spin Crossover in Transition Metal Compounds, Vol. 233–235 (Springer, 2004). [Google Scholar]
  16. Kahn O. & Martinez C. J. Spin-transition polymers: from molecular materials toward memory devices. Science 279, 44–48 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  17. Gütlich P., Hauser A. & Spiering H. Thermal and optical switching of spin states in iron(II) complexes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 33, 2024–2054 (1994). [Google Scholar]
  18. Bousseksou A., Molnár G. & Matouzenko G. Switching of molecular spin states in inorganic complexes by temperature, pressure, magnetic field and light: towards molecular devices. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2004, 4353–4369 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  19. Mannini M. et al. Magnetic memory of a single-molecule quantum magnet wired to a gold surface. Nat. Mater. 8, 194–197 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Stöhr J. & Siegmann H. C. in Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences, Magnetism: from Fundamentals to Nanoscale Dynamics, Vol. 152 (Springer, 2006). [Google Scholar]
  21. Gambardella P. et al. Supramolecular control of the magnetic anisotropy in two-dimensional high-spin Fe arrays at a metal surface. Nat. Mater. 8, 189–193 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Cotton F. A., Wilkinson G., Murillo C. A. & Bochmann M. Advanced Inorganic Chemistry, 6th edn (Wiley-Interscience, 1999). [Google Scholar]
  23. Huheey J. E., Keiter E. A. & Keiter R. L. Inorganic Chemistry: Principles of Structure and Reactivity 4th edn (Prentice Hall, 1997). [Google Scholar]
  24. Hartley F. R. The cis- and trans-effects of ligands. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2, 163–179 (1973). [Google Scholar]
  25. Hirjibehedin C. F., Lutz C. P. & Heinrich A. J. Spin coupling in engineered atomic structures. Science 312, 1021–1024 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Leuenberger M. N. & Loss D. Quantum computing in molecular magnets. Nature 410, 789–793 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Eaton S. S. & Eaton G. R. Magnetic susceptibility of porphyrins. Inorg. Chem. 19, 1095–1096 (1980). [Google Scholar]
  28. Ali Md.E., Sanyal B. & Oppeneer P. M. Tuning the magnetic interaction between manganese porphyrins and ferromagnetic Co substrate through dedicated control of the adsorption. J. Phys. Chem. C 113, 14381–14383 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  29. Oppeneer P. M., Panchmatia P. M., Sanyal B., Eriksson O. & Ali Md.E. Nature of the magnetic interaction between Fe-porphyrin molecules and ferromagnetic surfaces. Prog. Surf. Sci. 84, 18–29 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  30. Richter-Addo G. B., Legzdins P. & Burstyn J. Introduction: nitric oxide chemistry. Chem. Rev. 102, 857–860 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Barlow D. E., Scudiero L. & Hipps K. W. Scanning tunnelling microscopy study of the structure and orbital-mediated tunneling spectra of cobalt(II) phthalocyanine and cobalt(II) tetraphenylporphyrin on Au(111): mixed composition films. Langmuir 20, 4413–4421 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Buchner F. et al. Chemical fingerprints of large organic molecules in scanning tunneling microscopy: imaging adsorbate-substrate coupling of metalloporphyrins. J. Phys. Chem. C. 113, 16450–16457 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  33. Ghosh A. Metalloporphyrin-NO bonding: building bridges with organometallic chemistry. Acc. Chem. Res. 38, 943–954 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Wayland B. B., Minkiewicz J. V. & Abd-Elmageed M. E. Spectroscopic studies for tetraphenylporphyrincobalt(II) complexes of CO, NO, O2, RNC, and (RO3P), and a bonding model for complexes of CO, NO, and O2 with cobalt(II) and iron(II) porphyrins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 96, 2795–2801 (1974). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kozuka M. & Nakamoto K. Vibrational studies of (tetraphenylporphyrinato)cobalt(II) and its adduct with CO, NO, and O2 in gas matrices. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 103, 2162–2168 (1981). [Google Scholar]
  36. Sandell A., Nilsson A. & Mårtensson N. Adsorption of NO on Ni(100). Surf. Sci. 251–252, 971–978 (1991). [Google Scholar]
  37. Flechsig U. et al. Performance measurements at SLS SIM beamline. AIP Conf. Proc. 1234, 319–322 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  38. Jung T. A., Schlittler R. R. & Gimzewski J. K. Conformational identification of individual adsorbed molecules with the STM. Nature 386, 696–698 (1997). [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES