Abstract
The evolutionary loss of hepatic urate oxidase (uricase) has resulted in humans with elevated serum uric acid (urate). Uricase loss may have been beneficial to early primate survival. However, an elevated serum urate has predisposed man to hyperuricemia, a metabolic disturbance leading to gout, hypertension, and various cardiovascular diseases. Human serum urate levels are largely determined by urate reabsorption and secretion in the kidney. Renal urate reabsorption is controlled via two proximal tubular urate transporters: apical URAT1 (SLC22A12) and basolateral URATv1/GLUT9 (SLC2A9). In contrast, the molecular mechanism(s) for renal urate secretion remain unknown. In this report, we demonstrate that an orphan transporter hNPT4 (human sodium phosphate transporter 4; SLC17A3) was a multispecific organic anion efflux transporter expressed in the kidneys and liver. hNPT4 was localized at the apical side of renal tubules and functioned as a voltage-driven urate transporter. Furthermore, loop diuretics, such as furosemide and bumetanide, substantially interacted with hNPT4. Thus, this protein is likely to act as a common secretion route for both drugs and may play an important role in diuretics-induced hyperuricemia. The in vivo role of hNPT4 was suggested by two hyperuricemia patients with missense mutations in SLC17A3. These mutated versions of hNPT4 exhibited reduced urate efflux when they were expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Our findings will complete a model of urate secretion in the renal tubular cell, where intracellular urate taken up via OAT1 and/or OAT3 from the blood exits from the cell into the lumen via hNPT4.
Keywords: Epithelial Cell, Gout, Kidney, Transport Drugs, Uric Acid, Diuretics
Introduction
Urate is the end product of purine metabolism in humans and certain primates as a result of uricase genetic loss (urate oxidase degrades urate to allantoin) (1). Two independent nonsense mutations in this gene, found in human, chimpanzee, and orangutan but not in the gibbon, indicate that this loss had evolutionary advantages for early primates (2). Because urate has powerful antioxidant properties, uricase loss resulting in elevated serum urate may have been beneficial to early primate survival (1). In addition, Watanabe et al. (3) hypothesized that elevated serum urate levels provided a survival advantage by helping to maintain blood pressure under the low salt dietary conditions that prevailed during the middle to late Miocene period. Despite its beneficial role and given the fact that more than half of uricase-deficient mice die from urate nephropathy within 4 weeks of age, elevation in serum urate level produces a burden on the body (4). To circumvent this problem, the human body had to develop a urate excretion system.
The kidney plays a dominant role in maintaining serum urate levels (1, 5). Renal urate excretion is a function of the balance between reabsorption and secretion. Recently it was demonstrated that luminal urate is taken up by a urate-anion exchanger (URAT1; SLC22A12)3 (6) into the renal proximal tubular cell and that intracellular urate exits the cell into the interstitium/blood space via a voltage-driven urate efflux transporter (URATv1/GLUT9; SLC2A9) (7–9). In contrast, the molecular mechanism(s) regulating renal urate secretion still remain largely unknown. It has been proposed that OAT1 and/or OAT3, located on the basolateral side of renal proximal tubular cell, act as uptake transporters for urate from the interstitium/blood space into the cell (10), but the molecular identity for an apical urate transporter, which excretes intracellular urate to the luminal (urine) space, is elusive.
Recently, in their genome-wide association study (GWAS), Dehghan et al. (11) indicated that SLC17A3 was one of three gene loci associated with uric acid concentration and gout. The SLC17A3 gene product NPT4 was originally identified (see Fig. 1A) as a protein with close homology to type I Na+-dependent phosphate transporter NPT1 (SLC17A1) (12). Because the phosphate transport activity of NPT1 is lower than type II sodium phosphate transporter NaPi-II (SLC34) (13, 14), human NPT1 (hNPT1) is thought to transport organic anions such as para-aminohippurate (PAH) (15). To date, a hNPT4 substrate transport study has not been reported. In the current studies, we show that hNPT4 is the previously unknown urate efflux transporter on the apical side of human renal proximal tubule and is likely to act as an exit path for organic anionic drugs as well as urate in vivo.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Materials
[14C]PAH (1950 MBq/mmol), [3H]estradiol-glucuronide (1.67 TBq/mmol), [3H]estrone sulfate (2.1201 TBq/mmol), and [3H]taurocholate (185 GBq/mmol) were purchased from PerkinElmer Life Sciences. [14C]Urate (2.035 GBq/mmol) was purchased from Moravek (Brea, CA). [3H]Bumetanide (740 GBq/mmol) and [3H]prostaglandin E2 (7.4 TBq/mmol), were from American Radiolabeled Chemicals, Inc. (St. Louis, MO). All other chemicals and reagents were purchased from Sigma.
Tissue Distribution
0.8-μl samples from human multiple tissue cDNA Panels I and II (Clontech) were amplified as described previously (16) under the following conditions: 34 cycles of 30 s at 95 °C, 30 s at 68 °C, and 1.0 min at 72 °C for NPT4; only 25 cycles were performed for GAPDH). The PCR products (5.0 μl) were resolved on a 2% agarose gel. The primers used for PCR amplification are shown in Table 1.
TABLE 1.
Target | Primer sequences | Product size |
---|---|---|
hNPT4 | ||
Forward primer | 5′-GCTCGCTATGGAATAGCCCTCGT-3′ | 586 bp for hNPT4_L isoform |
Reverse primer | 5′-AGGGCCACCCAAGGGTTTCA-3′ | 352 bp for hNPT4_S isoform |
GAPDH | ||
Forward primer | 5′-TGAAGGTCGGAGTCAACGGATTTGGT-3′ | 983 bp |
Reverse primer | 5′-CATGTGGGCCATGAGGTCCACCAC-3′ |
Immunohistochemistry
Immunocytochemical analyses were performed as described previously (17). Xenopus laevis oocytes injected with cRNAs were fixed with paraformaldehyde and incubated with the anti-SLC17A3 antibody (Sigma; HPA016569) (1:500), followed by Alexa546-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG (Wako; diluted 1:200). Fluorescein Lotus tetragonolobus lectin (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) was used to identify proximal tubules (18). The sections were observed under a confocal laser scanning microscope (Fluoview FV500; Olympus). Alexa546 fluorescence was excited by green helium-neon laser light with a wavelength of 543 nm. Human single-tissue slides (Biochain) were used for light microscopic immunohistochemical analysis as described elsewhere (16). Antigen peptide corresponding to amino acid residues 2-38 of hNPT4_L (ATKTELSPTARESKNAQDMQVDETLIPRKVPSLCSAR) was used for absorption experiments.
Expression and Transport Assay
Human NPT4 isoform 1 and 2 cDNAs were purchased from OriGene Technologies. In vitro transcription and injection of capped cRNA (30–50 ng/oocyte) into oocytes were performed as described previously (8). The experiments were performed using three batches of oocytes, and the results from the representative experiments are expressed as the means ± S.E. Statistical significance was determined by Student's t test.
Electrophysiological Measurement
Electrode voltage-clamp experiments in Xenopus oocytes were performed as described previously (19, 20).
Mutation Analysis and Construction of Mutant cDNA
For the NPT4 sequence determination, we prepared specific primers for 11 NPT4 exons including an ORF (Table 2). Institutional approval was obtained at each participating site, and informed consent was given by the study participants. High molecular weight genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral whole blood cells and was amplified by PCR. The PCR products were sequenced in both directions using a 3130xl Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems) (8). The mutagenic oligonucleotide primers for generation of NPT4 mutants are shown in Table 3. Proper construction of the mutated cDNA was confirmed by complete sequencing.
TABLE 2.
Exon | Forward | Reverse |
---|---|---|
Exon 2 | 5′-ACTGGCACACCAAGAGCAC-3′ | 5′-TGCAATCACAAGCAGGACA-3′ |
Exon 3 | 5′-CAGAACCCCCGAGATCAA-3′ | 5′-GACCTTTTGCTTGCTTTCAA-3′ |
Exons 4,5 | 5′-TTGCTGTTTATTTGCTTGGA-3′ | 5′-CATTGAGCAGATGATGAGGA-3′ |
Exon 6 | 5′-TGCTCGTCTCCTTATGGTTT-3′ | 5′-AGGCAGGAGAACTTCCAAA-3′ |
Exon 7 | 5′-GTGTGGTGCCACTTCTAGGC-3′ | 5′-AACGGTAAATCCGACAGATG-3′ |
Exon 8 | 5′-TCTTGAGGCCTTAAATCTGG-3′ | 5′-AAAGGCAGTGAGACCACAAC-3′ |
Exons 9,10 | 5′-TGCCCTCACTAATCATTCCA-3′ | 5′-TGTGGTTCTTCCCCTATGGT-3′ |
Exon 11 | 5′-TGTCCTCATCCCTCTCATTG-3′ | 5′-AACCAGGCTTTAGGTCACCA-3′ |
Exon 12 | 5′-AGCCACTTTCAGGAAATGAA-3′ | 5′-CCATCCAAGGTGGGATAACT-3′ |
TABLE 3.
Mutation | Forward | Reverse |
---|---|---|
N68H | 5′-CATGGTAGCCATGGTCCACAGCACAAGCCCTC-3′ | 5′-GAGGGCTTGTGCTGTGGACCATGGCTACCATG-3′ |
F304S | 5′-CATATGTTTAGGCTGTTCCAGCCATCAATGGTTAG-3′ | 5′-CTAACCATTGATGGCTGGAACAGCCTAAACATATG-3′ |
RESULTS
hNPT4 has two splice variants: hNPT4_L (isoform 1, NM_001098486) and hNPT4_S (isoform 2, NM_006632) (Fig. 1B). The difference lies in the presence of the fourth exon present only in hNPT4_L. As previously reported, mRNAs for both hNPT4 isoforms were detected only in the kidney and liver by RT-PCR (Fig. 2A) (12). When complementary RNAs (cRNAs) were injected into Xenopus oocytes, hNPT4_L but not hNPT4_S was expressed on the plasma membrane (Fig. 2B). These results seem compatible with previous findings where NPT4 (U90545, short form) showed intracellular localization when expressed in COS cells (21). In contrast, we observed plasma membrane localization of hNPT4_L in COS cells.4 NPT4_L showed transport activities for PAH (Fig. 2C) as well as several organic anions such as estrone sulfate, estradiol-17-β-glucuronide, bumetanide, and ochratoxin A (Fig. 3), which was enhanced by the replacement of extracellular NaCl with KCl. Thus, hNPT4_L seems to be a multispecific organic anion transporter. Immunohistochemical analysis of paraffin-embedded human kidney sections revealed that NPT4 immunoreactivities, absorbed by antigen peptide, were detected in proximal tubules in renal cortex as well as some tubules and glomeruli (Fig. 4A). Strong immunoreactivities of hNPT4 were observed at the apical side of proximal tubules. Proximal tubular staining of hNPT4 was confirmed by the co-localization of proximal tubular marker, L. tetragonolobus lectin (Fig. 4B). Consequently, we used hNPT4_L for further characterization.
Next, we examined the PAH transport properties of hNPT4_L. Xenopus oocytes expressing hNPT4_L exhibited time-dependent and concentration-dependent transport of [14C]PAH (Fig. 5, A and B). The Eadie-Hofstee plot yielded a Km of 9.56 ± 0.51 mm (mean ± S.E. of four separate experiments), demonstrating that hNPT4 had low affinity for PAH (Fig. 5B). Removal of extracellular Na+ and Cl− did not affect PAH transport by hNPT4_L, whereas replacement of external Na+ with K+ (which depolarizes oocyte plasma membrane) facilitated PAH uptake, indicating that hNPT4_L activity was sensitive to membrane potential (Fig. 5C). Because of inside-negative cell potential, this voltage sensitivity should favor the efflux of PAH from tubular cells.
Consistent with the idea that hNPT4 acts as an efflux transporter under physiological conditions, hNPT4_L-expressing oocytes preloaded with [14C]PAH showed a time-dependent efflux of radioactivity when incubated in the standard uptake solution (Fig. 5D). PAH efflux via NPT4 is depressed by replacement of external Na+ with K+ (Fig. 5E) and dependent on concentration gradient (Fig. 5F). To confirm the voltage dependence of PAH transport by hNPT4, we performed electrophysiological studies via voltage clamp methods. In an I-V curve obtained by a ramping voltage command (Fig. 6A), hNPT4-expressing oocytes showed a large leak conductance compared with water-injected, control oocytes. The leak current seemed to be an increase in Cl− conductance because the reversal potential was approximately −20 mV, which was closed to the equilibrium potential of Cl− in oocytes (22). When PAH (5 mm) was added, the slope conductance was greatly potentiated, indicating the increase in Cl− conductance. In addition, there was an outwardly rectifying component at positive potentials, suggesting that influx of PAH caused outward current component increasing with depolarization. To isolate the PAH-mediated current, we removed Cl− from external solution and measured the PAH-induced current at −60 and −20 mV (Fig. 6B). The PAH-evoked outward current was more prominent at −20 mV, suggesting the voltage-driven, inward transport of PAH.
Based on these data, we conclude that hNPT4_L functions as a voltage-driven organic anion transporter. Given its apical membrane localization in proximal tubular cells (Fig. 4), we propose that hNPT4_L is responsible for transferring PAH from the cell into the lumen, the final step in secretion, following the initial step mediated by OAT1 and OAT3 (10) (Fig. 7).
The cis-inhibitory effect of various compounds at 1.0 mm (except for some compounds) on hNPT4-mediated [14C]PAH (10 μm) uptake was examined to investigate its substrate selectivity (Table 4). hNPT4 interacted with chemically heterogenous anionic compounds, such as probenecid, diuretics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and steroid sulfates. In particular, we found that PAH transport via hNPT4_L was strongly inhibited by loop diuretics such as bumetanide and furosemide. The IC50 values for bumetanide and furosemide were 391.6 ± 1.5 and 433.5 ± 1.5 μm, respectively (Fig. 8, A and B). Saturable uptake of [3H]bumetanide was observed in hNPT4-expressing oocytes (Km = 288.4 ± 41.3 μm) (Fig. 8C). Bumetanide currents were also observed under the voltage clamp experiments (Fig. 6C). These data also support the notion that hNPT4_L transports diuretics from the cell into the lumen.
TABLE 4.
Substrates | Uptake |
---|---|
% of control | |
Control (no inhibitor) | 100.0 ± 6.6 |
1.0 mm PAH | 84.1 ± 7.5a |
5.0 mm PAH | 68.1 ± 8.6a |
1.0 mm urate | 110.0 ± 11.0 |
5.0 mm urate | 98.9 ± 8.5 |
8.0 mm urate | 71.6 ± 5.8a |
1.0 mm probenecid | 38.5 ± 6.0b |
1.0 mm amiloride | 94.1 ± 19.3 |
1.0 mm hydrochlorothiazide | 66.5 ± 5.2c |
1.0 mm chlorothiazide | 54.9 ± 8.2c |
1.0 mm trichlormethiazide | 40.6 ± 3.8b |
1.0 mm ethacrynic acid | 15.4 ± 6.7b |
1.0 mm methazolamide | 79.7 ± 6.2a |
1.0 mm acetazolamide | 88.6 ± 5.4 |
1.0 mm spironolactone | 15.5 ± 2.1b |
1.0 mm bumetanide | 12.5 ± 1.7b |
1.0 mm furosemide | 5.8 ± 1.5b |
1.0 mm nicotinate | 107.0 ± 14.9 |
1.0 mm xanthine | 102.5 ± 6.0 |
1.0 mm hypoxanthine | 106.6 ± 6.4 |
1.0 mmd-lactate | 106.6 ± 12.3 |
1.0 mml-lactate | 92.2 ± 4.7 |
1.0 mm estrone | 60.8 ± 6.3c |
1.0 mm β-estradiol-3-sulfate | 5.7 ± 0.2b |
1.0 mm estriol | 72.3 ± 12.8a |
1.0 mm estrone sulfate | 14.6 ± 2.2b |
1.0 mm dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate | 18.9 ± 2.8b |
1.0 mm succinate | 106.8 ± 10.9 |
1.0 mm α-ketoglutarate | 93.7 ± 8.2 |
1.0 mm salicylate | 85.4 ± 5.2 |
1.0 mm penicillin G | 103.1 ± 7.4 |
1.0 mm cholate | 104.1 ± 9.7 |
1.0 mm taurocholate | 101.7 ± 8.1 |
1.0 mm sulfobromophthalein | 12.5 ± 1.3b |
1.0 mm diclofenac | 17.3 ± 7.8b |
1.0 mm ibuprofen | 59.7 ± 4.5b |
0.5 mm indomethacin | 9.9 ± 1.3b |
1.0 mm ochratoxin A | 41.0 ± 5.2b |
1.0 mm corticosterone | 8.0 ± 2.1b |
1.0 mm ouabain | 116.6 ± 7.2 |
1.0 mm cimetidine | 89.6 ± 13.2 |
1.0 mm quinidine | 54.3 ± 3.5b |
1.0 mm histamine | 108.8 ± 10.5 |
1.0 mm tetraethylammonium | 107.5 ± 3.7 |
1.0 mm DIDS | 97.9 ± 10.7 |
1.0 mm SITS | 97.0 ± 10.1 |
1.0 mm NPPB | 4.9 ± 0.6b |
a p < 0.05 versus the uptake in control.
b p < 0.001 versus the uptake in control.
c p < 0.01 versus the uptake in control.
It is clinically well known that diuretic administration leads to hyperuricemia, caused not only by the reduction of extracellular fluid but also by sharing the renal tubular secretion pathway with urate (23). Because hNPT4 interacted strongly with loop diuretics, we examined urate transport via hNPT4_L in oocytes to identify the mechanism responsible for diuretic-induced hyperuricemia. We observed KCl-enhanced urate uptake (Fig. 9A) in hNPT4_L-expressing oocytes. Similar to PAH, time-dependent [14C]urate uptake and efflux was observed (Fig. 9, B and C); however, because of its low water solubility, we could not determine the Km for urate. Applying urate to the bath solution induced currents under the voltage clamp conditions (Fig. 9D). Urate efflux via NPT4 is depressed by replacement of external Na+ with K+ (Fig. 9E). Dose-dependent inhibitory effects of loop diuretics on hNPT4-mediated urate uptake were observed (IC50 was 223.5 ± 1.5 μm for bumetanide and 73.5 ± 1.5 μm for furosemide) (Fig. 8, D and E). These results suggest that hNPT4 functions as a luminal voltage-dependent exit pathway for urate as well as other anionic substrates in the proximal tubule.
It is known that the majority of hyperuricemia patients have impaired renal urate excretion (24). Underexcretion-type hyperuricemia is caused by the enhancement of renal urate reabsorption and/or the reduction of renal urate secretion. As a component of the secretion pathway, alteration of urate efflux function by hNPT4 may affect the serum urate level in vivo. Furthermore, as described above, a recent GWAS indicated that some single nucleotide polymorphisms near the SLC17A3 gene showed association with uric acid concentration and risk of gout (11). Therefore, we sequenced the coding region of SLC17A3 gene in underexcretion-type hyperuricemia patients without any polymorphisms known to influence urate transport activity, such as Q141K in ABCG2 (25).
One of these patients (a 68-year-old Japanese male) had a plasma urate level of 7.5 mg/dl. His urate clearance was 5.1 ml/min, urate excretion was 636 mg/day, and the fractional excretion of urate was 5.93%. Analysis of the NPT4-coding region from the genomic DNA of this patient revealed the presence of a heterozygous T to C alteration at nucleotide 1021 within exon 8 of SLC17A3 (Fig. 10A), changing phenylalanine 304 (TTC) to a serine (TCC). This residue (Phe304) is located in the middle of the sixth transmembrane domain (Fig. 11). We also detected another heterozygous mutation, A to C at nucleotide 312 (in exon 3), which led to the substitution of asparagine by histidine (N68H); this residue (Asn68) is located in the putative N-glycosylation site in an unrelated subject (67-year-old Japanese male) with gout (Fig. 10A). None of these mutations were identified in 55 randomly chosen control Japanese individuals.
To confirm the function of mutant hNPT4_L, we analyzed urate efflux activity after injection of wild-type or mutated hNPT4_L cRNA into oocytes. We observed that these substitutions (N68H and F304S) significantly reduced urate transport activity (Fig. 10B). Expression of both wild-type and mutant hNPT4_L was detected in the plasma membrane by immunostaining (Fig. 10C). The membrane expression of hNPT4_L appeared lower in F304S mutant-injected oocytes, and this might contribute to its level of efflux activity, which was lower than the N68H mutant. These in vivo and in vitro data suggest that the mutation in hNPT4_L led to hyperuricemia in these patients.
DISCUSSION
In this study, we have investigated the characteristics of an orphan transporter hNPT4 (SLC17A3). This is the first report, to our knowledge, showing that hNPT4_L acts as a voltage-driven transporter for drugs and urate. Our findings will complete a model of urate secretion in the renal tubular cell, where urate in the blood is taken up via OAT1/OAT3 and intracellular urate exits from the cell into the tubular lumen via hNPT4 (Fig. 7).
Renal secretion of organic anions including exogenous (e.g. drugs) and endogenous substrates (e.g. urate) is performed by at least two steps in proximal tubular cells (26, 27). The first step is the transport of organic anions from the blood across the basolateral membrane into the cells. This transport, against an electrochemical gradient, occurs in exchange for intracellular dicarboxylates such as α-ketoglutarate. Two organic anion transporters, OAT1 and OAT3, have been proposed to be responsible for this step (28). The second is the exit of organic anions across the apical membrane at the tubular cells into the urine. This energetically downhill process for organic anions is thought to be mediated by membrane transporters. Classical studies using isolated brush border membrane vesicles demonstrated that the luminal efflux for PAH, a prototypical organic anion, involves both anion exchange mechanisms and voltage-driven facilitated transport (29). However, in the physiological conditions, the major exit path for organic anions into the lumen has been proposed to be facilitated diffusion along the electrochemical potential gradient (30), suggesting that a voltage-driven organic anion transporter should play an important role. In this study, we aimed to identify such a voltage-driven transporter at the apical membrane of the renal proximal tubular cell.
First, we examined the transport function of hNPT4_L using PAH. When the extracellular concentration of K+ was increased, PAH uptake mediated by hNPT4_L was elevated (Fig. 5C). Moreover, the results from electrophysiological measurements showed that membrane depolarization increased the outward current associated with PAH uptake into oocytes expressing hNPT4_L (Fig. 6, A and B); these results further support the notion that PAH transport by hNPT4_L occurs via a voltage-driven process. Based on the voltage-driven facilitated transport mechanisms of hNPT4_L and its localization at the apical membrane of proximal tubules, hNPT4_L is presumed to be well suited as an exit path for organic anions via the apical membrane of renal proximal tubules.
hNPT4_L mediated the transport of PAH, estrone sulfate, estradiol glucuronide, bumetanide, and ochratoxin A (Fig. 3), and it interacted with various anionic compounds such as probenecid, diuretics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and steroid sulfates (Table 4). Therefore, hNPT4_L is a multispecific organic anion transporter with overlapping substrate selectivity to OAT family (SLC22) members (28). Many substrates for OATs, excepting dicarboxylates and penicillin G, interacted with hNPT4_L. Thus, it will be interesting to determine the common mechanisms responsible for the similar substrate selectivity via structurally different organic anion transporters.
Because hNPT4_L interacted strongly with various diuretics such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, thiazides, and loop diuretics (Table 4) and because bumetanide and furosemide inhibited PAH transport via hNPT4_L in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 8, A and B), we further examined hNPT4_L-mediated bumetanide transport. [3H]Bumetanide uptake by hNPT4_L was enhanced when extracellular NaCl was replaced with KCl (Fig. 3). In addition, electrophysiological measurements indicated that the current was elicited by 1.0 mm bumetanide in oocytes expressing hNPT4_L, results similar to 5.0 mm PAH (Fig. 6C). Thus, it is likely that bumetanide transport by hNPT4_L was also voltage-driven. These results suggest that hNPT4 functions as a luminal voltage-dependent excretion pathway for loop diuretics in proximal tubules (23) (Fig. 7).
Hyperuricemia is a well known adverse effect of diuretic treatment (31). Diuretics are thought to have a direct action on urate transporter(s) in the renal proximal tubules that enhance urate influx and lead to an increase in serum urate level. Therefore, we examined whether hNPT4_L transports urate. We observed time-dependent [14C]urate uptake, efflux, (Fig. 10, B and C), and urate-induced currents under voltage clamp conditions (Fig. 10D). These characteristics seem compatible with a voltage-dependent efflux pathway for urate in the apical membrane of human proximal tubules indicated previously (32–34). Furthermore, dose-dependent inhibitory effects of bumetanide and furosemide on hNPT4_L-mediated urate transport (Fig. 8, D and E) suggest that the inhibition of urate efflux through this transporter by loop diuretics may be responsible for diuretic-induced hyperuricemia (Fig. 7).
In 2007, Li et al. (35) performed a GWAS using a genetically isolated population in Sardinia and identified SLC2A9 of the glucose transporter family as a gene correlated with serum uric acid level. We and others confirmed that the SLC2A9 gene product GLUT9 functions as a urate transporter (7–9). Particularly, we demonstrated that GLUT9 is a voltage-dependent urate efflux transporter URATv1 (8). Because GLUT9 is expressed mainly on the basolateral membrane of tubular cells in the human kidney (36), this transporter is likely to be involved in the efflux of urate toward the blood side, the final step of transcellular urate reabsorption (Fig. 7). A recent GWAS by Dehghan et al. (11) identified two new loci, ABCG2 and SLC17A3, which display association with uric acid concentration and risk of gout in addition to SLC2A9. Because SLC17A3 shows limited tissue localization, as displayed in Fig. 1A, our functional analysis of SLC17A3 gene product NPT4 will give a molecular basis for its role in the renal urate handling suggested by GWAS. In contrast, the contribution of ABCG2 gene product BCRP (breast cancer resistance protein), an ABC (ATP-binding cassette) transporter, in the kidney is controversial, although it was reported to transport urate by Woodward et al. (25). One report said that a moderate level of BCRP protein expression was detected despite no mRNA expression in the human kidney (37). Given its high expression in the liver and intestine, it is likely that ABCG2 variants with reduced transport activities lead to decreased urate excretion into the intestine rather than decreased urate excretion from the kidney.
Previously, we identified a pig voltage-driven organic anion transporter 1, pOATV1, from pig kidney cortex (38). The amino acid sequence of OATV1 showed the highest similarity to hNPT1 (63%) and remote similarity to hNPT4 (45%). When expressed in Xenopus oocytes, pOATV1 mediated the transport of a wide range of organic anions such as PAH, urate, and estrone sulfate. Similar to hNPT4_L, pOATV1 mediates facilitated diffusion driven by membrane voltage. However, PAH transport via pOATV1 was shown to be chloride-sensitive, whereas hNPT4_L was not. Because of this difference between these transporters, we could not, at this moment, conclude whether hNPT4_L is a human orthologue for pOATV1.
The in vivo role of hNPT4_L is supported by the fact that underexcretion-type hyperuricemia patients without any known polymorphisms that influence serum urate level (i.e. Q141K in ABCG2) were found to have missense mutations (N68H and F304S) in SLC17A3. These mutations were shown to reduce hNPT4_L-mediated urate transport activity in vitro (Fig. 10, A and B). These mutations were not likely to be polymorphism because they were not detected in an additional 200 Japanese gout patients, who were analyzed later. Based on our proposed model (Fig. 7), we predict that intact function of hNPT4 is necessary for normal urate secretion in the renal proximal tubule.
Functional characterization of hNPT4 as an apical exit pathway for drugs and urate, together with the fact that other multispecific drug efflux transporters such as breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2) and multidrug resistance protein 4 (MRP4/ABCC4) also mediate the transport of urate (25, 39), indicates that our body treated increased urate as a xenobiotic to relieve its disadvantageous effect despite its powerful antioxidant properties. This view is consistent with the fact that urate uptake into the renal tubular cells via basolateral membrane is mediated by other multispecific organic anion transporters, OAT1 and/or OAT3 (10). Thus, the renal secretory pathway for urate consists of arrays of multispecific organic anion transporters that have relatively low affinity and specificity for urate. This explains why many drugs including diuretics cause hyperuricemia (40); because such drugs compete for efflux transporters with urate, urate excretion from the kidney will be compromised. On the other hand, it is interesting that the renal reabsorptive pathway for urate is made up with transporters that have relatively high affinity and specificity, URAT1 (6) and URATv1 (8). Before the loss of uricase, these transporters may have functioned to preserve the “beneficial” anti-oxidant molecule of urate. Furthermore, their high selectivity and specificity for urate should make these reabsorptive transporters better candidates as novel hyperuricemia drug development targets (41–43).
Acknowledgments
We thank all of the patients involved in this study. We thank A. Yamanishi and Y. Kimura for immunohistochemical analysis; K. Uchimura, M. Hayata, J. Morinaga, R. Kofuji, and C. Sekita for genetic analysis; and A. Enomoto for critical reading of the manuscript.
This work was supported in part by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Grants KAKENHI 21390073, 21659216, and 21890245 and by the Nakatomi Foundation, the Gout Research Foundation of Japan, and Kyorin University School of Medicine Collaborative Project 2009.
T. Kimura and N. Anzai, unpublished observation.
- URAT1
- urate transporter 1
- SLC
- solute carrier
- GLUT9
- glucose transporter 9
- URATv1
- voltage-driven urate transporter
- OAT
- organic anion transporter
- NPT
- sodium phosphate transporter
- PAH
- para-aminohippurate
- GWAS
- genome-wide association study
- cRNA
- complementary RNA.
REFERENCES
- 1.Hediger M. A., Johnson R. J., Miyazaki H., Endou H. (2005) Physiology 20, 125–133 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wu X. W., Muzny D. M., Lee C. C., Caskey C. T. (1992) J. Mol. Evol. 34, 78–84 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Watanabe S., Kang D. H., Feng L., Nakagawa T., Kanellis J., Lan H., Mazzali M., Johnson R. J. (2002) Hypertension 40, 355–360 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wu X., Wakamiya M., Vaishnav S., Geske R., Montgomery C., Jr., Jones P., Bradley A., Caskey C. T. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 91, 742–746 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Anzai N., Kanai Y., Endou H. (2007) Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 19, 151–157 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Enomoto A., Kimura H., Chairoungdua A., Shigeta Y., Jutabha P., Cha S. H., Hosoyamada M., Takeda M., Sekine T., Igarashi T., Matsuo H., Kikuchi Y., Oda T., Ichida K., Hosoya T., Shimokata K., Niwa T., Kanai Y., Endou H. (2002) Nature 417, 447–452 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Vitart V., Rudan I., Hayward C., Gray N. K., Floyd J., Palmer C. N., Knott S. A., Kolcic I., Polasek O., Graessler J., Wilson J. F., Marinaki A., Riches P. L., Shu X., Janicijevic B., Smolej-Narancic N., Gorgoni B., Morgan J., Campbell S., Biloglav Z., Barac-Lauc L., Pericic M., Klaric I. M., Zgaga L., Skaric-Juric T., Wild S. H., Richardson W. A., Hohenstein P., Kimber C. H., Tenesa A., Donnelly L. A., Fairbanks L. D., Aringer M., McKeigue P. M., Ralston S. H., Morris A. D., Rudan P., Hastie N. D., Campbell H., Wright A. F. (2008) Nat. Genet. 40, 437–442 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Anzai N., Ichida K., Jutabha P., Kimura T., Babu E., Jin C. J., Srivastava S., Kitamura K., Hisatome I., Endou H., Sakurai H. (2008) J. Biol. Chem. 283, 26834–26838 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Caulfield M. J., Munroe P. B., O'Neill D., Witkowska K., Charchar F. J., Doblado M., Evans S., Eyheramendy S., Onipinla A., Howard P., Shaw-Hawkins S., Dobson R. J., Wallace C., Newhouse S. J., Brown M., Connell J. M., Dominiczak A., Farrall M., Lathrop G. M., Samani N. J., Kumari M., Marmot M., Brunner E., Chambers J., Elliott P., Kooner J., Laan M., Org E., Veldre G., Viigimaa M., Cappuccio F. P., Ji C., Iacone R., Strazzullo P., Moley K. H., Cheeseman C. (2008) PLoS Med. 5, e197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Eraly S. A., Vallon V., Rieg T., Gangoiti J. A., Wikoff W. R., Siuzdak G., Barshop B. A., Nigam S. K. (2008) Physiol. Genomics 33, 180–192 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dehghan A., Köttgen A., Yang Q., Hwang S. J., Kao W. L., Rivadeneira F., Boerwinkle E., Levy D., Hofman A., Astor B. C., Benjamin E. J., van Duijn C. M., Witteman J. C., Coresh J., Fox C. S. (2008) Lancet 372, 1953–1961 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ruddy D. A., Kronmal G. S., Lee V. K., Mintier G. A., Quintana L., Domingo R., Jr., Meyer N. C., Irrinki A., McClelland E. E., Fullan A., Mapa F. A., Moore T., Thomas W., Loeb D. B., Harmon C., Tsuchihashi Z., Wolff R. K., Schatzman R. C., Feder J. N. (1997) Genome Res. 7, 441–456 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Reimer R. J., Edwards R. H. (2004) Pflugers Arch. 447, 629–635 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Murer H., Forster I., Biber J. (2004) Pflugers Arch. 447, 763–767 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Uchino H., Tamai I., Yamashita K., Minemoto Y., Sai Y., Yabuuchi H., Miyamoto K., Takeda E., Tsuji A. (2000) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 270, 254–259 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Anzai N., Miyazaki H., Noshiro R., Khamdang S., Chairoungdua A., Shin H. J., Enomoto A., Sakamoto S., Hirata T., Tomita K., Kanai Y., Endou H. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 45942–45950 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tsuchida H., Anzai N., Shin H. J., Wempe M. F., Jutabha P., Enomoto A., Cha S. H., Satoh T., Ishida M., Sakurai H., Endou H. (2010) Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 25, 511–522 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Avner E. D., Sweeney W. E., Jr. (1990) Pediatr. Nephrol. 4, 372–377 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yamauchi Y., Izumi T., Unemura K., Uenishi Y., Nakagawa T., Kaneko S. (2007) Neurosci. Lett. 428, 72–76 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Horita S., Yamada H., Inatomi J., Moriyama N., Sekine T., Igarashi T., Endo Y., Dasouki M., Ekim M., Al-Gazali L., Shimadzu M., Seki G., Fujita T. (2005) J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 16, 2270–2278 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Melis D., Havelaar A. C., Verbeek E., Smit G. P., Benedetti A., Mancini G. M., Verheijen F. (2004) J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 27, 725–733 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kusano K., Miledi R., Stinnakre J. (1982) J. Physiol. 328, 143–170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ellison D. H., Wilcox C. S. (2008) Brenner & Rector's The Kidney, 8th Ed., pp. 1646–1678, Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mount D. B., Kwon C. Y., Zandi-Nejad K. (2006) Rheum. Dis. Clin. North Am. 32, 313–331 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Woodward O. M., Köttgen A., Coresh J., Boerwinkle E., Guggino W. B., Köttgen M. (2009) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 10338–10342 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Møller J. V., Sheikh M. I. (1982) Pharmacol. Rev. 34, 315–358 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Pritchard J. B., Miller D. S. (1993) Physiol. Rev. 73, 765–796 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Anzai N., Kanai Y., Endou H. (2006) J. Pharmacol. Sci. 100, 411–426 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Russel F. G., Masereeuw R., van Aubel R. A. (2002) Annu. Rev. Physiol. 64, 563–594 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Dantzler W. H. (2002) Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1566, 169–181 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Pascual E., Perdiguero M. (2006) Ann. Rheum. Dis. 65, 981–982 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Roch-Ramel F., Guisan B. (1999) News. Physiol. Sci. 14, 80–84 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Burckhardt G., Pritchard J. B. (2000) The Kidney Physiology and Pathophysiology, 3rd Ed., pp. 193–222, Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia [Google Scholar]
- 34.Rafey M. A., Lipkowitz M. S., Leal-Pinto E., Abramson R. G. (2003) Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 12, 511–516 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Li S., Sanna S., Maschio A., Busonero F., Usala G., Mulas A., Lai S., Dei M., Orrù M., Albai G., Bandinelli S., Schlessinger D., Lakatta E., Scuteri A., Najjar S. S., Guralnik J., Naitza S., Crisponi L., Cao A., Abecasis G., Ferrucci L., Uda M., Chen W. M., Nagaraja R. (2007) PLoS Genet. 3, e194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Augustin R., Carayannopoulos M. O., Dowd L. O., Phay J. E., Moley J. F., Moley K. H. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 16229–16236 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Krishnamurthy P., Schuetz J. D. (2006) Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 46, 381–410 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Jutabha P., Kanai Y., Hosoyamada M., Chairoungdua A., Kim D. K., Iribe Y., Babu E., Kim J. Y., Anzai N., Chatsudthipong V., Endou H. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 27930–27938 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Van Aubel R. A., Smeets P. H., van den Heuvel J. J., Russel F. G. (2005) Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 288, F327–F333 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Emmerson B. T. (1996) N. Engl. J. Med. 334, 445–451 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Anzai N., Endou H. (2007) Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2, 1251–1261 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Anzai N., Jutabha P., Endou H. (2010) Curr. Hypertens. Rev. 6, 148–154 [Google Scholar]
- 43.Anzai N., Jutabha P., Kimura T., Fukutomi T. (2010) Curr. Rheumatol. Rev. 6, in press [Google Scholar]