Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Nov 5.
Published in final edited form as: Org Lett. 2010 Nov 5;12(21):4876–4879. doi: 10.1021/ol102039c

Synthesis of Amidomethyltrifluoroborates and their Use in Cross-Coupling Reactions

Gary A Molander 1,, Marie-Aude Hiebel 1
PMCID: PMC2966550  NIHMSID: NIHMS241428  PMID: 20879742

Abstract

graphic file with name nihms241428u1.jpg

Amidomethyltrifluoroborates were successfully synthesized in a one-pot fashion and used in cross-coupling reactions with a wide variety of aryl and heteroaryl chlorides.


Amidomethylarenes are commonly found in a variety of biologically active compounds (Figure 1).1 Several strategies have been developed to obtain amidomethyl-containing products such as nucleophilic displacement,2 reductive N-alkylation,3 and more commonly amidation.4 These methods follow a consonant reactivity pattern based on the nucleophilicity of the nitrogen. Recently, cross-coupling reactions using N,N-dialkylaminomethyltrifluoroborates were described to access the analogous aminomethyl moiety.5 This approach provides access to amines using a C-C bond connection strategy complementary to existing C-N bond-forming approaches.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Biologically Active Molecules Containing the Amidomethyl Moiety

The N,N-dialkylaminomethyltrifluoroborates used in previous coupling efforts were obtained by a direct SN2 displacement of the halides of potassium halomethyltrifluoroborates. Unfortunately, amidomethyltrifluoroborates cannot be accessed in this manner, and thus it was necessary to develop a different approach to the trifluoroborate starting materials. The strategy chosen was based on previous work pioneered by Matteson,6 in which substituted boronate esters were obtained from halomethylboronate esters via intramolecular nucleophilic displacement and one carbon homologation of in situ generated LiCHX2 or LiCH2X species (X = Cl, Br, I).7 The “ate” complex resulting from initial attack of the nucleophile at the boron atom is followed by α-transfer to the neighboring carbon to form the elaborated boronate ester (Figure 2).8

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Reaction mechanism of the one-carbon homologation of boronate esters and the intramolecular nucleophilic displacement of α-halo boronate esters with various nucleophiles.

Amidomethylboronate esters have been synthesized following this strategy,9 but only a few examples were reported, and poor to moderate yields were observed for the formation of α-unsubstituted products in a process that required two to three steps.9f,10 Furthermore, apart from their biological evaluations, amidomethylborons have not been used with success as Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling partners.11 We disclose herein the formation of amidomethyltrifluoroborates synthesized in an original one-pot process from halomethylboronate esters. Additionally we report their palladium-catalyzed coupling with various aryl- and heteroaryl chlorides, which constitutes the first successful example of amidomethylation by a cross-coupling protocol. 12,13

The current study began with the preparation of amidomethyltrifluoroborates 4a-m using an adaptation of the Matteson procedure (Scheme 1).9

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

One-pot process to synthesize 4a-m

Thus 2-(chloromethyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolane 1 in the presence of potassium hexamethyldisilazide gave the expected disilylated aminoboronate ester 2a, which was deprotected in situ by the addition of methanol. The revealed free amine 2b was then reacted with various acyl chlorides to form the corresponding amides. The crude boronate esters 3 obtained in this one-pot fashion were directly treated with a saturated solution of KHF2 to afford 4a-m in good to excellent overall yields (Table 1).

Table 1.

Preparation of Amidomethyltrifluoroborates

graphic file with name nihms241428u2.jpg

entry RCOCl product % isolated yield
1 graphic file with name nihms241428t1.jpg graphic file with name nihms241428t2.jpg 4a: R1 = H 67
4b: R1 = p-F 76
4c: R1 = p-CF3 71
4d: R1 = p-Ph 77
4e: R1 = m-OMe 69a
2 graphic file with name nihms241428t3.jpg graphic file with name nihms241428t4.jpg 4f 62
3 graphic file with name nihms241428t5.jpg graphic file with name nihms241428t6.jpg 4g 59a
4 graphic file with name nihms241428t7.jpg graphic file with name nihms241428t8.jpg 4h 60a
5 graphic file with name nihms241428t9.jpg graphic file with name nihms241428t10.jpg 4i 56
6 graphic file with name nihms241428t11.jpg graphic file with name nihms241428t12.jpg 4j 63
7 graphic file with name nihms241428t13.jpg graphic file with name nihms241428t14.jpg 4k: R1 = H 41
4l: R1 = Me 41
8 graphic file with name nihms241428t15.jpg graphic file with name nihms241428t16.jpg 4m 54
a

Reaction for 12 h at rt in the presence of RCOCl

This method provided access to aromatic substituted carbamides 4a-f that contained electron withdrawing and electron donating groups (Table 1, entries 1 and 2). Saturated carbocycles (entries 3-5) as well as alkyl side chains (entries 6-8) could also be incorporated.

With these compounds in hand, the cross-coupling conditions were first optimized with 4a and p-chloroanisole as the electrophilic partner (Table 2, entry 6). The most effective coupling conditions were found to be 2.5 mol % of Pd(OAc)2, 5 mol % of XPhos and 3 equiv of Cs2CO3 in a 10:1 cyclopentyl methyl ether (CPME) and water mixture at 85 °C for 6 h with a stoichiometric amount of potassium trifluoroborate. On a larger scale reaction (1 g of product), the catalyst loading could be lowered to 1 mol % with similar results (entry 6). The generality of the method was then investigated by using structurally and electronically diverse aryl chlorides. Throughout the series of reaction partners studied, the expected coupling products were obtained in good to excellent yields, and a variety of functional groups including nitriles, ketones, aldehydes, esters, and alcohols were tolerated under these conditions. Sterically hindered electrophiles (Table 2, entries 2, 3, 7, 10) were found to couple in excellent yields, although an increase in the catalyst loading or in the reaction time was required.

Table 2.

Cross-Coupling of 4a with Diverse Aryl Chlorides

graphic file with name nihms241428u3.jpg

entry chloride product % isolated yield
1 graphic file with name nihms241428t17.jpg graphic file with name nihms241428t18.jpg 5a 87
2 graphic file with name nihms241428t19.jpg graphic file with name nihms241428t20.jpg 5b: R1 = H 83 (91)a
5c: R1 = Me 88b
3 graphic file with name nihms241428t21.jpg graphic file with name nihms241428t22.jpg 5d 65a
4 graphic file with name nihms241428t23.jpg graphic file with name nihms241428t24.jpg 5e: R1 = CN 87
5f: R1 = CHO 88
5g: R1 = Ac 88
5 graphic file with name nihms241428t25.jpg graphic file with name nihms241428t26.jpg 5h 98
6 graphic file with name nihms241428t27.jpg graphic file with name nihms241428t28.jpg 5i 95 (91)c
7 graphic file with name nihms241428t29.jpg graphic file with name nihms241428t30.jpg 5j 74
8 graphic file with name nihms241428t31.jpg graphic file with name nihms241428t32.jpg 5k 87
9 graphic file with name nihms241428t33.jpg graphic file with name nihms241428t34.jpg 5l 89
10 graphic file with name nihms241428t35.jpg graphic file with name nihms241428t36.jpg 5m 76

All reactions were carried out using 0.3 mmol of 4a and aryl chloride, 2.5 mol % Pd(OAc)2, 5 mol % XPhos, 0.9 mmol of Cs2CO3, 10:1 CPME/H2O (0.09 M), 85 °C, 6 h.

a

Used 5 mol % Pd(OAc)2, 10 mol % XPhos.

b

Heated reaction for 14 h.

c

Reaction performed on 4.1 mmol scale using 1 mol % Pd(OAc)2 and 2 mol % XPhos, 24 h at 85 °C.

To investigate the method further, the array of electrophiles was expanded to heteroaryl chlorides (Table 3). Chloropyridines bearing the halogen in the 3 or 4 position and other heteroaryl chlorides such as quinoline, thiophene or furan derivatives were successfully coupled with 4a under our previously described conditions in moderate to excellent yields. Unfortunately, despite attempting to increase the reaction temperature and increase or decrease the catalyst loading, 2-chloropyridine (6d) and 2-chloro-4-methoxypyrimidine (6g) gave rise to a significant amount of homocoupled product (entries 3, 6).

Table 3.

Cross-Coupling of 4a with Various Heteroaryl Chlorides

graphic file with name nihms241428u4.jpg

entry chloride product % isolated yield
1 graphic file with name nihms241428t37.jpg graphic file with name nihms241428t38.jpg 6a: R1 = H 79
6b: R1 = OMe 89
2 graphic file with name nihms241428t39.jpg graphic file with name nihms241428t40.jpg 6c 25 (49)a
3 graphic file with name nihms241428t41.jpg graphic file with name nihms241428t42.jpg 6d 24 (33)a
4 graphic file with name nihms241428t43.jpg graphic file with name nihms241428t44.jpg 6e 58b (66)a
5 graphic file with name nihms241428t45.jpg graphic file with name nihms241428t46.jpg 6f 86
6 graphic file with name nihms241428t47.jpg graphic file with name nihms241428t48.jpg 6g 25
7 graphic file with name nihms241428t49.jpg graphic file with name nihms241428t50.jpg 6h: R1 = H 86
6i: R1 = Ac 78
6j: R1 = CHO 82
8 graphic file with name nihms241428t51.jpg graphic file with name nihms241428t52.jpg 6k 89

All reactions were carried out using 0.3 mmol of 4a and heteroaryl chloride, 2.5 mol % Pd(OAc)2, 5 mol % XPhos, 0.9 mmol of Cs2CO3, 10:1 CPME/H2O (0.09 M), 85 °C, 6 h.

a

Heated for 24 h with 5 mol % Pd(OAc)2, 10 mol % XPhos.

b

Heated reaction for 14 h.

We next examined the efficiency of the reaction with different amidomethyltrifluoroborates (Table 4). Both cyclic and acyclic carbamides gave the expected coupling product in good to excellent yields except for the biphenyl- and the pentafluorophenyl substrates (7d and 7f) (Table 4, entries 1 and 2), where degradation products were mostly recovered.

Table 4.

Cross-Coupling with Various Potassium Amidomethyltrifluoroborates

graphic file with name nihms241428u5.jpg

entry R product % isolated yield
1 graphic file with name nihms241428t53.jpg 4b graphic file with name nihms241428t54.jpg 7b: R1 = p-F 89
4c 7c: R1 = p-CF3 88
4d 7d: R1 = p-Ph 18
4e 7e: R1 = m-OMe 81
2 graphic file with name nihms241428t55.jpg 4f graphic file with name nihms241428t56.jpg 7f 32
3 graphic file with name nihms241428t57.jpg 4g graphic file with name nihms241428t58.jpg 7g 77
4 graphic file with name nihms241428t59.jpg 4h graphic file with name nihms241428t60.jpg 7h 90
5 graphic file with name nihms241428t61.jpg 4i graphic file with name nihms241428t62.jpg 7i 52 (83)a
6 graphic file with name nihms241428t63.jpg 4j graphic file with name nihms241428t64.jpg 7j 94
7 graphic file with name nihms241428t65.jpg 4k graphic file with name nihms241428t66.jpg 7k: R1 = H 83
4l 7l: R1 = Me 93
8 graphic file with name nihms241428t67.jpg 4m graphic file with name nihms241428t68.jpg 7m 81

All reactions were carried out using 0.3 mmol of 1a and aryl chloride, 2.5 mol % Pd(OAc)2, 5 mol % XPhos, 0.9 mmol of Cs2CO3, 10:1 CPME/H2O (0.09 M), 85 °C, 6 h.

a

Used 5 mol % Pd(OAc)2, 10 mol % XPhos.

Finally, the electrophile compatibility was examined (Table 5). Surprisingly, the aryl iodide gave low yields, indicating that the oxidative addition is not the limiting step of the catalytic cycle under these conditions. Aryl triflates and -bromides coupled cleanly in high yields. Unfortunately, tosylate derivatives exhibited no reactivity.

Table 5.

Electrophile Compatibility

graphic file with name nihms241428u6.jpg

entry aryl electrophile % isolated yield
1 I 31
2 Br 85
3 OTf 93
4 OTs traces

All reactions were carried out using 0.3 mmol of 1a and aryl chloride, 2.5 mol % Pd(OAc)2, 5 mol %XPhos, 0.9 mmol of Cs2CO3, 10:1 CPME/H2O (0.09 M), 85 °C, 6 h.

In summary, an efficient one-pot synthetic protocol successfully delivered α-unsubstituted amidomethyltrifluoroborates. These trifluoroborates proved to be suitable reagents to introduce the amidomethyl functional group into substrates via a unique bond construction. Various electron-rich and electron-poor aryl and heteroaryl electrophiles were used, demonstrating the generality of this method.

Supplementary Material

1_si_001

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a National Priorities Research Program (NPRP) grant from the Qatar National Research Fund (Grant no. 08-035-1-008) and the NIH (R01 GM-081376). We thank Frontier Scientific for a generous gift of Pd(OAc)2. Dr. Rakesh Kohli (University of Pennsylvania) is acknowledged for obtaining HRMS data.

Footnotes

Supporting Information Available Experimental procedures, spectral characterization, and copies of 1H, 13C, 19F, and 11B NMR spectra for all compounds. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http/pubs.acs.org.

References

  • 1.(a) French KJ, Zhuang Y, Maines LW, Gao P, Wang W, Beljanski V, Upson JJ, Green CL, Keller SN, Smith CD. J Phamarcol Exp Ther. 2010;133:129. doi: 10.1124/jpet.109.163444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Belyk KM, Morrison HG, Jones P, Summa V. WO Patent 60,730. 2007; (c) McIntyre JA, Castaner J. Drugs Future. 2004;29:992. [Google Scholar]; (d) Ratti S, Quarato P, Casagrande C, Fumagalli R, Corsini A. Eur J Pharmacol. 1998;355:77. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(98)00467-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gajda T, Zwierzak A. Biochemistry. 1981;1:1005. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.(a) Dubé D, Scholte AA. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999;40:2295. [Google Scholar]; (b) Oaki Y, Kobayashi S. J Comb Chem. 1999;1:371. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.(a) Han SY, Kim YA. Tetrahedron. 2004;60:2447. [Google Scholar]; (b) Montalbetti CAGN, Falque V. Tetrahedron. 2005;61:10827. [Google Scholar]; (c) Huang Z, Reilly JE, Buckle RN. Synlett. 2007:1026. [Google Scholar]; (d) NordstrØm LU, Vogt H, Madsen R. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:17672. doi: 10.1021/ja808129p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Terada Y, Ieda N, Komura K, Sugi Y. Synlett. 2008:2318. [Google Scholar]; (f) Burés J, Martín M, Urpí F, Vilarrasa J. J Org Chem. 2009;74:2203. doi: 10.1021/jo802825e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.(a) Molander GA, Ham J. Org Lett. 2006;8:2031. doi: 10.1021/ol060375a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Molander GA, Sandrock DL. Org Lett. 2007;9:1597. doi: 10.1021/ol070543e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Molander GA, Gormisky PE, Sandrock DL. J Org Chem. 2008;73:2052. doi: 10.1021/jo800183q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.For reviews on α-halo boronate esters see: Matteson DS. Chem Rev. 1989;89:1535.Matteson DS. Tetrahedron. 1989;45:1859.Matteson DS. Tetrahedron. 1998;54:10555.
  • 7.(a) Brown HC, Rogic MM, Rathke MW, Kabalka GW. J Am Chem Soc. 1968;90:818. [Google Scholar]; (b) Matteson DS, Mah RWH. J Am Chem Soc. 1963;85:2599. [Google Scholar]; (c) Brown HC, De Lue NR, Yamamoto Y, Maruyama K, Kasahara T, Murahashi S, Sanoda A. J Org Chem. 1977;42:4088. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.(a) Sadhu KM, Matteson DS. Organometallics. 1985;4:1687. [Google Scholar]; (b) Sadhu KM, Matteson DS. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986;27:795. [Google Scholar]; (c) Brown HC, Phadke AS, Rangaishenvi MV. J Am Chem Soc. 1998;110:6263. doi: 10.1021/ja00226a061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Brown HC, Singh SM. Organometallics. 1986;5:994. [Google Scholar]; (e) Brown HC, Singh SM, Rangaishenvi MV. J Org Chem. 1986;51:3150. [Google Scholar]; (f) Wallace RH, Zong KK. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992;33:6941. [Google Scholar]; (g) Soundararajan R, Li G, Brown HC. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994;35:8957. [Google Scholar]; (m) Davoli P, Fava R, Morandi S, Spaggiari A, Prati F. Tetrahedron. 1993;49:177. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.(a) Matteson DS, Sadhu KM, Lienhard GE. J Am Chem Soc. 1981;103:5241. [Google Scholar]; (b) Matteson DS, Jesthi PK, Kizhakethil MS. Organometallics. 1984;3:1284. [Google Scholar]; (c) Matteson DS, Sadhu KM. Organometallics. 1984;3:614. [Google Scholar]; (d) Verleijen JPG, Faber PM, Bodewes HH, Braker AH, Van Leusen D, van Leusen AM. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995;36:2109. [Google Scholar]; (e) Matteson DS, Singh RP, Sutton CH, Verheyden JD, Lu JH. Heteroat Chem. 1997;8:487. [Google Scholar]; (f) Matteson DS. Pure Appl Chem. 2003;75:1249. [Google Scholar]; (g) Lai JH, Liu Y, Wu W, Zhou Y, Maw HH, Bachovchin WW, Bhat KL, Bock CW. J Org Chem. 2006;71:512. doi: 10.1021/jo051757h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (h) Inglis SR, Woon ECY, Thompson AL, Schofield CJ. J Org Chem. 2010;75:468. doi: 10.1021/jo901930v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.(a) Caselli E, Powers RA, Blasczcak LC, Wu CYE, Prati F, Shoicher BK. Chem Biol. 2001;8:17. doi: 10.1016/s1074-5521(00)00052-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Kinder DH, Katzenellenbogen JA. J Med Chem. 1985;28:1917. doi: 10.1021/jm00150a027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Pechenov A, Stefanova ME, Nicholas RA, Peddi S, Gutheil WG. Biochemistry. 2003;42:579. doi: 10.1021/bi026726k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tanaka K. US Patent 15,351. 2008:A1.
  • 12.For reviews on organotrifluoroborate salts see: Molander GA, Figueroa R. Aldrichim Acta. 2005;38:49.Molander GA, Ellis N. Acc Chem Res. 2007;40:275. doi: 10.1021/ar050199q.Stefani HA, Cella R, Adriano S. Tetrahedron. 2007;63:3623.Darses S, Genêt JP. Chem Rev. 2008;108:288. doi: 10.1021/cr0509758.
  • 13.(a) Molander GA, Biolatto B. J Org Chem. 2007;68:4302. doi: 10.1021/jo0342368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Molander GA, Canturk B, Kennedy LE. J Org Chem. 2009;74:973. doi: 10.1021/jo802590b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1_si_001

RESOURCES