Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2009 Feb 25;65(Pt 3):m323. doi: 10.1107/S1600536809005972

Guanidinium tetra­bromidomercurate(II)

Hiromitsu Terao a, Thorsten M Gesing b, Hideta Ishihara c, Yoshihiro Furukawa d, B Thimme Gowda e,*
PMCID: PMC2968626  PMID: 21582096

Abstract

The Hg atoms in the crystal structure of the title compound, (CH6N3)2[HgBr4], are tetra­hedrally coordinated by four Br atoms and the resulting [HgBr4]2− tetra­hedral ions are linked to the [C(NH2)3]+ ions by bromine–hydrogen bonds, forming a three-dimensional network. In the structure, the anions are located on special positions. The two different Hg⋯Br distances of 2.664 (1) and 2.559 (1) Å observed in the tetra­bromidomercurate unit are due to the connection of Br atoms to different number of H atoms.

Related literature

For the ability of the guanidinium ion to make hydrogen bonds and its unique planar shape, see: Terao et al. (2000). For related literature, see: Ishihara et al. (2002); Furukawa et al. (2005)graphic file with name e-65-0m323-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • (CH6N3)2[HgBr4]

  • M r = 640.41

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 10.035 (2) Å

  • b = 11.164 (2) Å

  • c = 13.358 (3) Å

  • β = 111.67 (3)°

  • V = 1390.7 (6) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 22.53 mm−1

  • T = 298 K

  • 0.09 × 0.09 × 0.09 mm

Data collection

  • Stoe IPDS-I diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: none

  • 9651 measured reflections

  • 1361 independent reflections

  • 982 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.093

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.030

  • wR(F 2) = 0.069

  • S = 0.90

  • 1361 reflections

  • 79 parameters

  • 6 restraints

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 0.71 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −1.03 e Å−3

Data collection: EXPOSE (Stoe & Cie, 1999); cell refinement: CELL (Stoe & Cie, 1999); data reduction: XPREP (Bruker, 2003); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS86 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL93 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Crystal Impact, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL93 (Sheldrick, 2008).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809005972/bt2874sup1.cif

e-65-0m323-sup1.cif (12.9KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809005972/bt2874Isup2.hkl

e-65-0m323-Isup2.hkl (67.3KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯Br2i 0.87 (9) 3.03 (4) 3.845 (8) 158 (9)
N1—H1B⋯Br1ii 0.87 (9) 2.77 (6) 3.512 (7) 144 (8)
N2—H2A⋯Br1iii 0.87 (9) 2.72 (4) 3.541 (7) 159 (8)
N2—H2B⋯Br2i 0.87 (9) 2.74 (4) 3.535 (7) 153 (8)
N3—H3A⋯Br1iv 0.87 (9) 3.05 (10) 3.505 (8) 115 (8)
N3—H3B⋯Br1iii 0.87 (9) 2.98 (8) 3.667 (9) 137 (9)

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic; (iii) Inline graphic; (iv) Inline graphic.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

The guanidium ion, [C(NH2)3]+ is interesting due to its ability of making hydrogen bonds and its unique planar shape (Terao et al., 2000). Further, the guanidium ions tend to undergo reorientation motions about their (pseudo) C3 axes in the crystals. Due to the soft nature of the Hg atom amenable to polarization, the Hg-halogen bonds are sensitive to the intermolecular interactions such as hydrogen bonding (Ishihara et al., 2002). This was evident in the halogen NQR of the Hg compounds in which the resonance lines are widely spread in frequency (Furukawa et al., 2005). Thus we are interested in studying the structure and bonding in this class of compounds. As a part of our study, we report herein the crystal structure of Guanidinium tetrabromidomercurate(II). In the structure, mercury atoms are tetrahedrally coordinated by four bromine atoms and the resulting HgBr4 tetrahedra are interconnected to the [C(NH2)3]+ ions by bromine-hydrogen bonds (Fig. 1) forming a three-dimensional network. In the tetrabromidomercurate unit, two different Hg—Br distances were observed: Hg—Br1 = 2.664 (1) Å and Hg—Br2 = 2.559 (1) Å. The shorter distance of the latter is due to its connection with two hydrogen atoms, whereas the Br1 is connected to four different hydrogen atoms, which elongate the Hg—Br bond (Fig.2). The C(NH2)3 moity (Fig. 3) itself is planar where the N—H bonds are somewhat elongated (1.01 (2) Å) to form the network bonds to the bromine atoms of the HgBr4 tetrahedra.

Experimental

Guanidinium tetrabromidomercurate(II) was prepared by slow concentration of methanolic solution containing mercuric bromide (0.01 mole) and guanidium bromide (0.02 mole) in 1:2 molar ratio. The purity of the compound was checked by elemental analysis and characterized by its NMR and NQR spectra (Furukawa et al., 2005). The single crystals used in X-ray diffraction studies were grown in methanolic solution by a slow evaporation at room temperature.

Refinement

The N-H distances were restrained to 0.87 (1)Å and the coordinates of the H atoms were refined with isotropic displacement parameters set to 1.2 times of the Ueq of the parent atom.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Molecular structure of (I), showing the atom labeling scheme. The displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. The H atoms are represented as small spheres of arbitrary radii.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

: Connection scheme of the HgBr42- tetrahedra with the [C(NH2)3]+ ions.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

: The planar [C(NH2)3]+ ion.

Crystal data

(CH6N3)2[HgBr4] F(000) = 1144
Mr = 640.41 Dx = 3.059 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/c Melting point: not measured K
Hall symbol: -C 2yc Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 10.035 (2) Å Cell parameters from 2000 reflections
b = 11.164 (2) Å θ = 2.9–26.1°
c = 13.358 (3) Å µ = 22.53 mm1
β = 111.67 (3)° T = 298 K
V = 1390.7 (6) Å3 Cylindric, colourless transparent
Z = 4 0.09 × 0.09 × 0.09 mm

Data collection

Stoe IPDS-I diffractometer 982 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube Rint = 0.093
graphite θmax = 26.1°, θmin = 2.9°
imaging plate dynamic profile intergration scans h = −12→12
9651 measured reflections k = −13→13
1361 independent reflections l = −16→16

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.030 H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.069 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0376P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 0.90 (Δ/σ)max = 0.001
1361 reflections Δρmax = 0.71 e Å3
79 parameters Δρmin = −1.03 e Å3
6 restraints Extinction correction: SHELXL93 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods Extinction coefficient: 0.00077 (10)

Special details

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Hg1 0.5000 0.71191 (4) 0.2500 0.0577 (2)
Br1 0.30789 (8) 0.86270 (7) 0.27353 (7) 0.0555 (2)
Br2 0.38905 (10) 0.60032 (7) 0.07086 (6) 0.0635 (3)
C1 0.4454 (8) 0.8215 (6) 0.6018 (6) 0.0492 (18)
N1 0.5515 (10) 0.8736 (7) 0.5829 (6) 0.070 (2)
H1A 0.592 (10) 0.818 (7) 0.558 (8) 0.084*
H1B 0.549 (10) 0.950 (2) 0.594 (8) 0.084*
N2 0.4254 (7) 0.7072 (6) 0.5904 (6) 0.0625 (17)
H2A 0.363 (7) 0.673 (8) 0.612 (7) 0.075*
H2B 0.485 (8) 0.665 (7) 0.571 (7) 0.075*
N3 0.3560 (9) 0.8857 (7) 0.6335 (7) 0.075 (2)
H3A 0.369 (11) 0.960 (3) 0.622 (8) 0.090*
H3B 0.278 (7) 0.856 (9) 0.636 (9) 0.090*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Hg1 0.0706 (3) 0.0544 (3) 0.0586 (3) 0.000 0.0359 (2) 0.000
Br1 0.0569 (4) 0.0485 (4) 0.0714 (5) −0.0003 (3) 0.0359 (4) −0.0070 (4)
Br2 0.0950 (6) 0.0453 (5) 0.0638 (5) −0.0062 (4) 0.0454 (5) −0.0100 (4)
C1 0.051 (4) 0.043 (4) 0.043 (4) 0.005 (3) 0.005 (3) −0.006 (3)
N1 0.090 (5) 0.054 (4) 0.064 (5) −0.021 (4) 0.026 (4) −0.001 (4)
N2 0.058 (4) 0.052 (4) 0.081 (5) −0.005 (3) 0.030 (4) −0.011 (4)
N3 0.081 (5) 0.063 (5) 0.073 (5) 0.011 (5) 0.018 (5) −0.009 (4)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

Hg1—Br2 2.5593 (10) N1—H1A 0.87 (9)
Hg1—Br2i 2.5593 (10) N1—H1B 0.87 (9)
Hg1—Br1 2.6639 (9) N2—H2A 0.87 (9)
Hg1—Br1i 2.6639 (9) N2—H2B 0.87 (9)
C1—N2 1.293 (10) N3—H3A 0.87 (9)
C1—N1 1.316 (11) N3—H3B 0.87 (9)
C1—N3 1.334 (11)
Br2—Hg1—Br2i 121.74 (4) C1—N1—H1A 107 (7)
Br2—Hg1—Br1 109.51 (4) C1—N1—H1B 109 (7)
Br2i—Hg1—Br1 106.33 (3) H1A—N1—H1B 144 (10)
Br2—Hg1—Br1i 106.33 (3) C1—N2—H2A 120 (6)
Br2i—Hg1—Br1i 109.51 (4) C1—N2—H2B 118 (7)
Br1—Hg1—Br1i 101.62 (4) H2A—N2—H2B 121 (9)
N2—C1—N1 121.0 (8) C1—N3—H3A 107 (8)
N2—C1—N3 118.3 (8) C1—N3—H3B 122 (8)
N1—C1—N3 120.7 (7) H3A—N3—H3B 125 (10)

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, y, −z+1/2.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
N1—H1A···Br2i 0.87 (9) 3.03 (4) 3.845 (8) 158 (9)
N1—H1B···Br1ii 0.87 (9) 2.77 (6) 3.512 (7) 144 (8)
N2—H2A···Br1iii 0.87 (9) 2.72 (4) 3.541 (7) 159 (8)
N2—H2B···Br2i 0.87 (9) 2.74 (4) 3.535 (7) 153 (8)
N3—H3A···Br1iv 0.87 (9) 3.05 (10) 3.505 (8) 115 (8)
N3—H3B···Br1iii 0.87 (9) 2.98 (8) 3.667 (9) 137 (9)

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, y, −z+1/2; (ii) −x+1, −y+2, −z+1; (iii) −x+1/2, −y+3/2, −z+1; (iv) x, −y+2, z+1/2.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: BT2874).

References

  1. Bruker (2003). XPREP Bruker AXS GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany.
  2. Crystal Impact (2008). DIAMOND Crystal Impact GmbH, Bonn, Germany.
  3. Furukawa, Y., Terao, H., Ishihara, H., Gesing, T. M. & Buhl, J.-C. (2005). Hyperfine Interactions, 159, 143–148.
  4. Ishihara, H., Hatano, N., Horiuchi, K. & Terao, H. (2002). Z. Naturforsch. Teil A, 57, 343–347.
  5. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  6. Stoe & Cie (1999). EXPOSE and CELL Stoe & Cie GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany.
  7. Terao, H., Hashimoto, M., Hashimoto, A. & Furukawa, Y. (2000). Z. Naturforsch. Teil A, 55, 230–236.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809005972/bt2874sup1.cif

e-65-0m323-sup1.cif (12.9KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809005972/bt2874Isup2.hkl

e-65-0m323-Isup2.hkl (67.3KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES