Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2009 Mar 6;65(Pt 4):o707–o708. doi: 10.1107/S1600536809007557

6,6′-Diethoxy-2,2′-[2,2-dimethylpropane-1,3-diylbis(nitrilomethylidyne)]diphenol

Hoong-Kun Fun a,*, Hadi Kargar b,, Reza Kia a, Arezoo Jamshidvand b
PMCID: PMC2969095  PMID: 21582445

Abstract

In the crystal structure, the title Schiff base compound, C23H30N2O4, exhibits crystallographic twofold rotation symmetry. The imino group is coplanar with the aromatic ring with an N—C—C—C torsion angle of -179.72 (9)°. An intra­molecular O—H⋯N hydrogen bond forms a six-membered ring, producing an S(6) ring motif. The dihedral angle between symmetry related benzene rings is 28.05 (5)°. The eth­oxy group makes a C—O—C—C torsion angle of −7.20 (16)° with the benzene ring. The crystal structure is stabilized by inter­molecular C—H⋯π inter­actions.

Related literature

For bond-length data, see: Allen et al. (1987). For hydrogen-bond motifs, see: Bernstein et al. (1995). For information on Schiff base ligands, complexes and their applications, see, for example: Calligaris & Randaccio, (1987); Casellato & Vigato, (1977); Pal et al. (2005); Reglinski et al. 2004; Hou et al. (2001); Ren et al. (2002). For the stability of the temperature controller used for the data collection, see: Cosier & Glazer (1986).graphic file with name e-65-0o707-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • C23H30N2O4

  • M r = 398.49

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 5.6523 (1) Å

  • b = 12.9591 (2) Å

  • c = 28.3771 (3) Å

  • β = 91.282 (1)°

  • V = 2078.07 (5) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.09 mm−1

  • T = 100 K

  • 0.43 × 0.22 × 0.04 mm

Data collection

  • Bruker SMART APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2005) T min = 0.880, T max = 0.997

  • 21349 measured reflections

  • 3560 independent reflections

  • 2743 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.042

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.045

  • wR(F 2) = 0.128

  • S = 1.07

  • 3560 reflections

  • 134 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.42 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.26 e Å−3

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2005); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2005); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL and PLATON (Spek, 2009).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809007557/at2735sup1.cif

e-65-0o707-sup1.cif (17.1KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809007557/at2735Isup2.hkl

e-65-0o707-Isup2.hkl (174.7KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O1—H1⋯N1 0.82 1.85 2.5772 (12) 147
C11—H11ACg1i 0.96 2.87 3.6007 (12) 133

Symmetry code: (i) Inline graphic. Cg1 is the centroid of the C1–C6 benzene ring.

Acknowledgments

HKF and RK thank the Malaysian Government and Universiti Sains Malaysia for the Science Fund grant No. 305/PFIZIK/613312). RK thanks Universiti Sains Malaysia for the award of a post-doctoral research fellowship. HK and AJ thank PNU for financial support. HKF also thanks Universiti Sains Malaysia for the Research University Golden Goose grant No. 1001/PFIZIK/811012.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

The condensation of primary amines with carbonyl compounds yields Schiff base (Casellato & Vigato, 1977) that are still now regarded as one of the most potential group of chelators for facile preparations of metallo-organic hybrid materials. In the past two decades, the synthesis, structure and properties of Schiff base complexes have stimulated much interest for their noteworthy contributions in single molecule-based magnetism, materials science, catalysis of many reactions like carbonylation, hydroformylation, reduction, oxidation, epoxidation and hydrolysis, etc (Pal et al., 2005; Reglinski et al., 2004; Hou et al., 2001; Ren et al., 2002). This is due to the fact that Schiff bases offer opportunities for inducing substrate chirality, tuning the metal-centered electronic factor and enhancing the solubility and stability of either homogeneous or heterogeneous catalysts. Only a relatively small number of free Schiff base ligands have been characterized (Calligaris & Randaccio, 1987). As an extension of our work on the structural characterization of Schiff base compounds, the title compound, is reported here.

The molecule of the title compound, (Fig. 1), has a crystallographic twofold rotation symmetry. The atom C9 lies across a crystallographic twofold rotation symmetry. An intramolecular O—H···N hydrogen bond forms a six-membered ring, producing a S(6) ring motif (Bernstein et al. 1995). The dihedral angle between the symmetry related benzene rings is 28.05 (5)°. The ethoxy group makes a torsion angle (C11—O2—C2—C3) of -7.20 (16)° with the benzene ring. The N atom is in close proximity to the H atom of the methylene group of the diamine segment, with H8B—N1 distance of 2.70 Å. The crystal structure is stabilized by intermolecular C—H···π interactions [Cg1 is the centroid of the C1–C6 benzene ring] (Table 1).

Experimental

The synthetic method has been described earlier (Reglinski et al., 2004), except that 3-ethoxysalicylaldehyde was used. Single crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction were obtained by evaporation of an methanol solution at room temperature.

Refinement

H atom of the hydroxy group was positioned by a freely rotating O—H bond and constrained with a fixed distance of 0.82 Å. The rest of the hydrogen atoms were positioned geometrically with a riding model approximation with C—H = 0.93-0.97 Å and Uiso(H) = 1.2 or 1.5 (C & O). A rotating group model was used for the methyl group of the ethoxy segment.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The molecular structure of the title compound with atom labels and 50% probability ellipsoids for non-H atoms. The suffix A corresponds to symmetry code (-x + 1, y, -z + 1/2).

Crystal data

C23H30N2O4 F(000) = 856
Mr = 398.49 Dx = 1.274 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/c Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2yc Cell parameters from 5303 reflections
a = 5.6523 (1) Å θ = 2.9–31.8°
b = 12.9591 (2) Å µ = 0.09 mm1
c = 28.3771 (3) Å T = 100 K
β = 91.282 (1)° Plate, yellow
V = 2078.07 (5) Å3 0.43 × 0.22 × 0.04 mm
Z = 4

Data collection

Bruker SMART APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer 3560 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 2743 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphite Rint = 0.042
φ and ω scans θmax = 31.8°, θmin = 1.4°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2005) h = −8→8
Tmin = 0.880, Tmax = 0.997 k = −18→19
21349 measured reflections l = −42→41

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.045 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.128 H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.07 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0621P)2 + 0.9557P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
3560 reflections (Δ/σ)max = 0.001
134 parameters Δρmax = 0.42 e Å3
0 restraints Δρmin = −0.26 e Å3

Special details

Experimental. The crystal was placed in the cold stream of an Oxford Cyrosystems Cobra open-flow nitrogen cryostat (Cosier & Glazer, 1986) operating at 100.0 (1)K.
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
O2 −0.21577 (13) 0.86647 (6) 0.42709 (3) 0.01900 (18)
O1 0.07879 (14) 0.77817 (6) 0.36945 (3) 0.01951 (18)
H1 0.1800 0.7580 0.3514 0.029*
N1 0.44608 (15) 0.78978 (7) 0.31751 (3) 0.01556 (18)
C1 0.11143 (18) 0.87962 (8) 0.37834 (4) 0.0150 (2)
C2 −0.04483 (18) 0.92916 (8) 0.40916 (4) 0.0157 (2)
C3 −0.01574 (19) 1.03346 (8) 0.41899 (4) 0.0180 (2)
H3A −0.1215 1.0665 0.4386 0.022*
C4 0.1713 (2) 1.08960 (8) 0.39974 (4) 0.0189 (2)
H4A 0.1897 1.1593 0.4066 0.023*
C5 0.32737 (19) 1.04064 (8) 0.37052 (4) 0.0168 (2)
H5A 0.4531 1.0774 0.3582 0.020*
C6 0.29882 (18) 0.93596 (8) 0.35912 (3) 0.01445 (19)
C7 0.46777 (18) 0.88493 (8) 0.32869 (3) 0.0151 (2)
H7A 0.5941 0.9225 0.3172 0.018*
C8 0.62015 (17) 0.74010 (8) 0.28797 (4) 0.0149 (2)
H8A 0.7249 0.6980 0.3075 0.018*
H8B 0.7150 0.7925 0.2729 0.018*
C9 0.5000 0.67209 (11) 0.2500 0.0132 (3)
C10 0.68697 (18) 0.60294 (9) 0.22779 (4) 0.0175 (2)
H10A 0.7602 0.5606 0.2518 0.026*
H10B 0.8049 0.6451 0.2134 0.026*
H10C 0.6130 0.5597 0.2043 0.026*
C11 −0.36178 (19) 0.90890 (9) 0.46303 (4) 0.0181 (2)
H11A −0.4504 0.9675 0.4508 0.022*
H11B −0.2647 0.9318 0.4896 0.022*
C12 −0.5284 (2) 0.82495 (9) 0.47814 (4) 0.0215 (2)
H12A −0.6358 0.8522 0.5007 0.032*
H12B −0.4392 0.7694 0.4921 0.032*
H12C −0.6163 0.7998 0.4512 0.032*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
O2 0.0195 (4) 0.0172 (4) 0.0207 (4) −0.0019 (3) 0.0086 (3) −0.0030 (3)
O1 0.0212 (4) 0.0142 (4) 0.0235 (4) −0.0046 (3) 0.0087 (3) −0.0061 (3)
N1 0.0162 (4) 0.0165 (4) 0.0141 (4) −0.0009 (3) 0.0029 (3) −0.0018 (3)
C1 0.0177 (5) 0.0132 (5) 0.0141 (4) −0.0009 (3) 0.0004 (3) −0.0010 (3)
C2 0.0165 (4) 0.0159 (5) 0.0147 (4) −0.0005 (4) 0.0022 (3) −0.0001 (4)
C3 0.0221 (5) 0.0157 (5) 0.0163 (5) 0.0017 (4) 0.0026 (4) −0.0015 (4)
C4 0.0249 (5) 0.0128 (5) 0.0190 (5) 0.0002 (4) 0.0010 (4) −0.0003 (4)
C5 0.0200 (5) 0.0142 (5) 0.0164 (4) −0.0018 (4) 0.0009 (4) 0.0012 (4)
C6 0.0164 (4) 0.0144 (5) 0.0126 (4) −0.0006 (3) 0.0008 (3) 0.0004 (3)
C7 0.0155 (4) 0.0166 (5) 0.0134 (4) −0.0022 (3) 0.0014 (3) 0.0017 (3)
C8 0.0132 (4) 0.0160 (5) 0.0154 (4) −0.0011 (3) 0.0029 (3) −0.0002 (3)
C9 0.0132 (6) 0.0131 (6) 0.0134 (6) 0.000 0.0034 (5) 0.000
C10 0.0174 (5) 0.0168 (5) 0.0186 (5) 0.0039 (4) 0.0032 (4) −0.0005 (4)
C11 0.0194 (5) 0.0196 (5) 0.0157 (4) 0.0015 (4) 0.0051 (4) −0.0012 (4)
C12 0.0191 (5) 0.0243 (6) 0.0213 (5) 0.0011 (4) 0.0060 (4) 0.0020 (4)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

O2—C2 1.3692 (12) C7—H7A 0.9300
O2—C11 1.4357 (12) C8—C9 1.5382 (13)
O1—C1 1.3506 (12) C8—H8A 0.9700
O1—H1 0.8200 C8—H8B 0.9700
N1—C7 1.2784 (13) C9—C10 1.5319 (13)
N1—C8 1.4568 (13) C9—C10i 1.5319 (13)
C1—C6 1.4065 (14) C9—C8i 1.5382 (13)
C1—C2 1.4112 (14) C10—H10A 0.9600
C2—C3 1.3890 (15) C10—H10B 0.9600
C3—C4 1.4039 (15) C10—H10C 0.9600
C3—H3A 0.9300 C11—C12 1.5075 (16)
C4—C5 1.3789 (15) C11—H11A 0.9700
C4—H4A 0.9300 C11—H11B 0.9700
C5—C6 1.4031 (14) C12—H12A 0.9600
C5—H5A 0.9300 C12—H12B 0.9600
C6—C7 1.4601 (14) C12—H12C 0.9600
C2—O2—C11 117.29 (8) N1—C8—H8B 109.4
C1—O1—H1 109.5 C9—C8—H8B 109.4
C7—N1—C8 120.45 (9) H8A—C8—H8B 108.0
O1—C1—C6 122.26 (9) C10—C9—C10i 108.40 (12)
O1—C1—C2 118.29 (9) C10—C9—C8i 110.18 (6)
C6—C1—C2 119.43 (9) C10i—C9—C8i 108.99 (6)
O2—C2—C3 125.73 (9) C10—C9—C8 108.99 (6)
O2—C2—C1 114.65 (9) C10i—C9—C8 110.18 (6)
C3—C2—C1 119.62 (9) C8i—C9—C8 110.08 (12)
C2—C3—C4 120.85 (10) C9—C10—H10A 109.5
C2—C3—H3A 119.6 C9—C10—H10B 109.5
C4—C3—H3A 119.6 H10A—C10—H10B 109.5
C5—C4—C3 119.54 (10) C9—C10—H10C 109.5
C5—C4—H4A 120.2 H10A—C10—H10C 109.5
C3—C4—H4A 120.2 H10B—C10—H10C 109.5
C4—C5—C6 120.77 (10) O2—C11—C12 107.36 (9)
C4—C5—H5A 119.6 O2—C11—H11A 110.2
C6—C5—H5A 119.6 C12—C11—H11A 110.2
C5—C6—C1 119.75 (9) O2—C11—H11B 110.2
C5—C6—C7 120.06 (9) C12—C11—H11B 110.2
C1—C6—C7 120.16 (9) H11A—C11—H11B 108.5
N1—C7—C6 121.55 (9) C11—C12—H12A 109.5
N1—C7—H7A 119.2 C11—C12—H12B 109.5
C6—C7—H7A 119.2 H12A—C12—H12B 109.5
N1—C8—C9 111.29 (7) C11—C12—H12C 109.5
N1—C8—H8A 109.4 H12A—C12—H12C 109.5
C9—C8—H8A 109.4 H12B—C12—H12C 109.5
C11—O2—C2—C3 −7.20 (15) O1—C1—C6—C5 −178.44 (10)
C11—O2—C2—C1 172.54 (8) C2—C1—C6—C5 −0.41 (15)
O1—C1—C2—O2 0.25 (14) O1—C1—C6—C7 −0.50 (15)
C6—C1—C2—O2 −177.86 (9) C2—C1—C6—C7 177.53 (9)
O1—C1—C2—C3 180.00 (9) C8—N1—C7—C6 −178.59 (9)
C6—C1—C2—C3 1.89 (15) C5—C6—C7—N1 −179.73 (10)
O2—C2—C3—C4 177.87 (10) C1—C6—C7—N1 2.34 (15)
C1—C2—C3—C4 −1.86 (15) C7—N1—C8—C9 −136.31 (10)
C2—C3—C4—C5 0.31 (16) N1—C8—C9—C10 −166.89 (8)
C3—C4—C5—C6 1.21 (16) N1—C8—C9—C10i −48.07 (11)
C4—C5—C6—C1 −1.15 (15) N1—C8—C9—C8i 72.16 (7)
C4—C5—C6—C7 −179.09 (9) C2—O2—C11—C12 −178.04 (9)

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, y, −z+1/2.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
O1—H1···N1 0.82 1.85 2.5772 (12) 147
C11—H11A···Cg1ii 0.96 2.87 3.6007 (12) 133

Symmetry codes: (ii) x−1, y, z.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: AT2735).

References

  1. Allen, F. H., Kennard, O., Watson, D. G., Brammer, L., Orpen, A. G. & Taylor, R. (1987). J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, pp. S1–19.
  2. Bernstein, J., Davis, R. E., Shimoni, L. & Chang, N.-L. (1995). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.34, 1555–1573.
  3. Bruker (2005). APEX2, SAINT and SADABS Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  4. Calligaris, M. & Randaccio, L. (1987). Comprehensive Coordination Chemistry, Vol. 2, edited by G. Wilkinson, pp. 715–738. London: Pergamon.
  5. Casellato, U. & Vigato, P. A. (1977). Coord. Chem. Rev.23, 31–50.
  6. Cosier, J. & Glazer, A. M. (1986). J. Appl. Cryst.19, 105–107.
  7. Hou, B., Friedman, N., Ruhman, S., Sheves, M. & Ottolenghi, M. (2001). J. Phys. Chem. B, 105, 7042–7048.
  8. Pal, S., Barik, A. K., Gupta, S., Hazra, A., Kar, S. K., Peng, S.-M., Lee, G.-H., Butcher, R. J., El Fallah, M. S. & Ribas, J. (2005). Inorg. Chem.44, 3880–3889. [DOI] [PubMed]
  9. Reglinski, J., Taylor, M. K. & Kennedy, A. R. (2004). Acta Cryst. C60, o169–o172. [DOI] [PubMed]
  10. Ren, S., Wang, R., Komatsu, K., Bonaz-Krause, P., Zyrianov, Y., McKenna, C. E., Csipke, C., Tokes, Z. A. & Lien, E. J. (2002). J. Med. Chem.45, 410–419. [DOI] [PubMed]
  11. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  12. Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809007557/at2735sup1.cif

e-65-0o707-sup1.cif (17.1KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809007557/at2735Isup2.hkl

e-65-0o707-Isup2.hkl (174.7KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES