Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2009 May 23;65(Pt 6):o1378. doi: 10.1107/S1600536809018716

2-Methyl-4-nitro­phenol

Sheng Bi a, Yong-Zhong Wu b, Yi-Xin Zhou a, Jian-Guo Tang a, Cheng Guo a,*
PMCID: PMC2969836  PMID: 21583226

Abstract

The mol­ecule of the title compound, C7H7NO3, is nearly planar [maximum deviation 0.112 (3) Å for one of the notro O atoms]. In the crystal structure, inter­molecular O—H⋯O and C—H⋯O inter­actions link the mol­ecules into a three-dimensional network.

Related literature

For a related structure, see: Ahmed & Ashwini (2004). For bond-length data, see: Allen et al. (1987).graphic file with name e-65-o1378-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • C7H7NO3

  • M r = 153.14

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 5.6210 (11) Å

  • b = 8.7420 (17) Å>

  • c = 14.300 (3) Å

  • β = 100.71 (3)°

  • V = 690.4 (2) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.12 mm−1

  • T = 294 K

  • 0.30 × 0.20 × 0.10 mm

Data collection

  • Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968) T min = 0.966, T max = 0.988

  • 1378 measured reflections

  • 1245 independent reflections

  • 870 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.027

  • 3 standard reflections frequency: 120 min intensity decay: 1%

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.054

  • wR(F 2) = 0.181

  • S = 1.01

  • 1245 reflections

  • 102 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.25 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.24 e Å−3

Data collection: CAD-4 Software (Enraf–Nonius, 1989); cell refinement: CAD-4 Software; data reduction: XCAD4 (Harms & Wocadlo, 1995); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809018716/hk2688sup1.cif

e-65-o1378-sup1.cif (14.6KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809018716/hk2688Isup2.hkl

e-65-o1378-Isup2.hkl (61.6KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O3—H3A⋯O2i 0.82 2.10 2.770 (4) 138
C7—H7C⋯O1ii 0.96 2.57 3.505 (5) 165

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Center of Testing and Analysis, Nanjing University, for support.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

Some derivatives of benzoic acids are important chemical materials. We report herein the crystal structure of the title compound.

In the molecule of the title compound (Fig 1), the bond lengths (Allen et al., 1987) and angles are within normal ranges. Ring A (C1-C6) is, of course, planar. Atoms O1, O2, O3, N and C7 are 0.112 (3), 0.023 (3), 0.049 (3), 0.026 (4) and -0.042 (3) Å away from the ring plane, respectively. So, the molecule is nearly planar.

In the crystal structure, intermolecular O-H···O and C-H···O interactions (Table 1) link the molecules into a network, in which they may be effective in the stabilization of the structure.

Experimental

For the preparation of the title compound, ethyl acetate (150 ml), 2-methyl-phenol (5.9 g) and zinc chloride (7.4 g) are placed in an ultrasonic cleaning bath equipped with a round botton flask, and then nitric acid (5.9 g) was added dropwise in 3 min. After the reaction was completed, water (200 ml) was added. After evaporation of the organic layer, the obtained product (Ahmed & Ashwini, 2004) was crystallized by slow evaporation of a methanol solution.

Refinement

H atoms were positioned geometrically, with O-H = 0.82 Å (for OH) and C-H = 0.93 and 0.96 Å for aromatic and methyl H, respectively, and constrained to ride on their parent atoms, with Uiso(H) = xUeq(C,O), where x = 1.2 for aromatic H and x = 1.5 for all other H atoms.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The molecular structure of the title molecule, with the atom-numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

A partial packing diagram of the title compound. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines.

Crystal data

C7H7NO3 F(000) = 320
Mr = 153.14 Dx = 1.473 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/n Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2yn Cell parameters from 25 reflections
a = 5.6210 (11) Å θ = 9–13°
b = 8.7420 (17) Å µ = 0.12 mm1
c = 14.300 (3) Å T = 294 K
β = 100.71 (3)° Block, colorless
V = 690.4 (2) Å3 0.30 × 0.20 × 0.10 mm
Z = 4

Data collection

Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer 870 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube Rint = 0.027
graphite θmax = 25.3°, θmin = 2.7°
ω/2θ scans h = 0→6
Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968) k = 0→10
Tmin = 0.966, Tmax = 0.988 l = −17→16
1378 measured reflections 3 standard reflections every 120 min
1245 independent reflections intensity decay: 1%

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.054 H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.181 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.08P)2 + 0.74P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.01 (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1245 reflections Δρmax = 0.25 e Å3
102 parameters Δρmin = −0.24 e Å3
0 restraints Extinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods Extinction coefficient: 0.017 (4)

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
O1 −0.3440 (5) 0.6807 (3) 0.9304 (2) 0.0769 (9)
O2 −0.0576 (5) 0.7542 (3) 0.8605 (2) 0.0682 (8)
O3 0.0480 (4) 0.0536 (3) 0.81980 (17) 0.0567 (7)
H3A −0.0372 −0.0079 0.8417 0.085*
N −0.1770 (5) 0.6536 (3) 0.8896 (2) 0.0490 (8)
C1 0.0652 (6) 0.4640 (4) 0.8248 (2) 0.0478 (9)
H1A 0.1525 0.5429 0.8034 0.057*
C2 0.1146 (6) 0.3143 (4) 0.8076 (2) 0.0487 (9)
H2A 0.2352 0.2908 0.7734 0.058*
C3 −0.0137 (6) 0.1979 (4) 0.8410 (2) 0.0417 (8)
C4 −0.1941 (5) 0.2284 (3) 0.8932 (2) 0.0410 (8)
C5 −0.2457 (6) 0.3796 (4) 0.9085 (2) 0.0415 (8)
H5A −0.3678 0.4038 0.9418 0.050*
C6 −0.1175 (5) 0.4950 (4) 0.8747 (2) 0.0413 (8)
C7 −0.3278 (6) 0.1019 (4) 0.9313 (3) 0.0531 (9)
H7A −0.2143 0.0360 0.9707 0.080*
H7B −0.4172 0.0441 0.8793 0.080*
H7C −0.4375 0.1443 0.9684 0.080*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
O1 0.093 (2) 0.0485 (16) 0.104 (2) 0.0137 (14) 0.0576 (18) −0.0051 (15)
O2 0.0861 (19) 0.0303 (13) 0.097 (2) −0.0030 (12) 0.0392 (16) 0.0063 (13)
O3 0.0661 (15) 0.0341 (13) 0.0802 (17) 0.0000 (11) 0.0405 (13) −0.0053 (11)
N 0.0594 (18) 0.0337 (15) 0.0567 (17) 0.0039 (13) 0.0180 (14) 0.0005 (13)
C1 0.0539 (19) 0.0371 (17) 0.059 (2) −0.0036 (14) 0.0281 (17) 0.0044 (15)
C2 0.0496 (19) 0.0413 (18) 0.063 (2) −0.0036 (15) 0.0302 (17) −0.0024 (16)
C3 0.0438 (17) 0.0339 (15) 0.0503 (18) −0.0019 (14) 0.0168 (14) −0.0029 (14)
C4 0.0389 (16) 0.0397 (17) 0.0473 (18) −0.0032 (13) 0.0156 (14) −0.0012 (14)
C5 0.0403 (16) 0.0407 (17) 0.0469 (17) 0.0021 (14) 0.0171 (14) 0.0005 (14)
C6 0.0461 (17) 0.0312 (16) 0.0500 (18) 0.0009 (13) 0.0177 (14) −0.0006 (13)
C7 0.054 (2) 0.045 (2) 0.068 (2) −0.0034 (15) 0.0285 (17) 0.0007 (16)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

O3—C3 1.357 (4) C2—H2A 0.9300
O3—H3A 0.8200 C3—C4 1.393 (4)
N—O1 1.217 (3) C4—C5 1.379 (4)
N—O2 1.225 (4) C4—C7 1.496 (4)
N—C6 1.451 (4) C5—C6 1.379 (4)
C1—C2 1.370 (5) C5—H5A 0.9300
C1—C6 1.382 (4) C7—H7A 0.9600
C1—H1A 0.9300 C7—H7B 0.9600
C2—C3 1.382 (4) C7—H7C 0.9600
C3—O3—H3A 109.5 C5—C4—C7 121.1 (3)
O1—N—O2 122.9 (3) C3—C4—C7 121.2 (3)
O1—N—C6 118.4 (3) C6—C5—C4 120.5 (3)
O2—N—C6 118.7 (3) C6—C5—H5A 119.8
C2—C1—C6 118.4 (3) C4—C5—H5A 119.8
C2—C1—H1A 120.8 C5—C6—C1 121.6 (3)
C6—C1—H1A 120.8 C5—C6—N 119.9 (3)
C1—C2—C3 120.4 (3) C1—C6—N 118.5 (3)
C1—C2—H2A 119.8 C4—C7—H7A 109.5
C3—C2—H2A 119.8 C4—C7—H7B 109.5
O3—C3—C2 115.9 (3) H7A—C7—H7B 109.5
O3—C3—C4 122.7 (3) C4—C7—H7C 109.5
C2—C3—C4 121.5 (3) H7A—C7—H7C 109.5
C5—C4—C3 117.7 (3) H7B—C7—H7C 109.5
O1—N—C6—C5 −1.5 (5) O3—C3—C4—C5 −178.4 (3)
O2—N—C6—C5 178.6 (3) C2—C3—C4—C5 1.8 (5)
O1—N—C6—C1 177.3 (3) O3—C3—C4—C7 1.4 (5)
O2—N—C6—C1 −2.6 (5) C2—C3—C4—C7 −178.3 (3)
C6—C1—C2—C3 −1.0 (5) C3—C4—C5—C6 −1.5 (5)
C2—C1—C6—C5 1.2 (5) C7—C4—C5—C6 178.6 (3)
C2—C1—C6—N −177.5 (3) C4—C5—C6—C1 0.0 (5)
C1—C2—C3—O3 179.7 (3) C4—C5—C6—N 178.8 (3)
C1—C2—C3—C4 −0.5 (5)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
O3—H3A···O2i 0.82 2.10 2.770 (4) 138
C7—H7C···O1ii 0.96 2.57 3.505 (5) 165

Symmetry codes: (i) x, y−1, z; (ii) −x−1, −y+1, −z+2.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: HK2688).

References

  1. Ahmed, K. & Ashwini, K. (2004). Ultrason. Sonochem. pp. 455–457.
  2. Allen, F. H., Kennard, O., Watson, D. G., Brammer, L., Orpen, A. G. & Taylor, R. (1987). J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, pp. S1–19.
  3. Enraf–Nonius (1989). CAD-4 Software Enraf–Nonius, Delft, The Netherlands.
  4. Farrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst.30, 565.
  5. Harms, K. & Wocadlo, S. (1995). XCAD4 University of Marburg, Germany.
  6. North, A. C. T., Phillips, D. C. & Mathews, F. S. (1968). Acta Cryst. A24, 351–359.
  7. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809018716/hk2688sup1.cif

e-65-o1378-sup1.cif (14.6KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809018716/hk2688Isup2.hkl

e-65-o1378-Isup2.hkl (61.6KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES