Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2009 Aug 26;65(Pt 9):o2244. doi: 10.1107/S1600536809033297

4-Methyl­benzaldehyde thio­semi­carbazone

Jian Zhang a, Hao Geng a, Ling-hua Zhuang a, Guo-wei Wang a,*
PMCID: PMC2969930  PMID: 21577642

Abstract

The title compound, C9H11N3S, was prepared by reacting 4-methyl­benzaldehyde with thio­semicarbazide. An intra­molecular N—H⋯N hydrogen bond helps to establish the observed mol­ecular conformation. The crystal packing is realized by inter­molecular N—H⋯S hydrogen bonds.

Related literature

For general background to thio­semicarbazone compounds, see: Casas et al. (2000); Tarafder et al. (2000); Ferrari et al. (2000); Deschamps et al. (2003); Maccioni et al.(2003); Chimenti et al. (2007); Zhang et al. (2009). For bond-length data, see: Allen et al. (1987).graphic file with name e-65-o2244-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • C9H11N3S

  • M r = 193.27

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 13.234 (3) Å

  • b = 8.221 (2) Å

  • c = 10.311 (2) Å

  • β = 111.15 (3)°

  • V = 1046.2 (4) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.27 mm−1

  • T = 293 K

  • 0.30 × 0.20 × 0.10 mm

Data collection

  • Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968) T min = 0.924, T max = 0.974

  • 1982 measured reflections

  • 1898 independent reflections

  • 1322 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.032

  • 3 standard reflections every 200 reflections intensity decay: 9%

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.052

  • wR(F 2) = 0.146

  • S = 1.00

  • 1898 reflections

  • 120 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.26 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.20 e Å−3

Data collection: CAD-4 Software (Enraf–Nonius, 1989); cell refinement: CAD-4 Software; data reduction: XCAD4 (Harms & Wocadlo, 1995); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809033297/im2136sup1.cif

e-65-o2244-sup1.cif (15.5KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809033297/im2136Isup2.hkl

e-65-o2244-Isup2.hkl (93.4KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N2—H2A⋯Si 0.86 2.54 3.389 (3) 168
N3—H3B⋯Sii 0.86 2.61 3.395 (3) 153
N3—H3A⋯N1 0.86 2.29 2.641 (4) 105

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Center of Testing and Analysis, Nanjing University, for support.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

Thiosemicarbazones constitute an important class of N,S donor ligands due to their ability to react with a wide range of metals (Casas et al., 2000). Thiosemicarbazones exhibit various biological activities and have therefore attracted considerable pharmaceutical interest (Maccioni et al., 2003; Ferrari et al., 2000). They have been evaluated as antiviral, antibacterial and anticancer therapeutics. Thiosemicarbazones belong to a large group of thiourea derivatives, whose biological activities are a function of the parent aldehyde or ketone moiety (Chimenti et al., 2007). Schiff bases in general show potential as antimicrobial and anticancer agents (Tarafder et al., 2000; Deschamps et al., 2003) and have therefore envisaged biochemical and pharmacological applications. We are focusing our synthetic and structural studies on new products of thiazole Schiff bases from thiosemicarbazones (Zhang et al., 2009). We herein report the crystal structure of the title compound (I).

The atom-numbering scheme of (I) is shown in Fig.1, and all bond lengths are within normal ranges (Allen et al., 1987).

The sulfur atom and the hydrazine nitrogen N1 are in trans position with respect to the C9–N2 bond. The molecular conformation is determined by a strong intramolecular hydrogen bond N3–H3A···N1(2.641 (3) A°).

The planar phenyl ring A (C2/C3/C4/C5/C6/C7, r.m.s. deviation 0.0115 (1) Å) and the pseudo five-membered ring B(N1/N2/C9/N3/H3A, r.m.s. deviation 0.035 (1) Å that is formed by the N3—H3A···N1 hydrogen bond enclose a dihedral angle of 14 (1)°. The dihedral angle between the thiourea group (N1/N2/C9/S) and the phenyl ring measures to 17 (2)°.

The crystal packing is realized by intermolecular N—H···S hydrogen bonds (Table 1, Fig. 1 and Fig.2).

Experimental

A mixture of 4-methyl-benzaldehyde (1.20 g, 0.01 mol) and hydrazinecarbothioamide (0.91 g, 0.01 mol) in 20 ml of absolute methanol was refluxed for about 3 h. After cooling, the precipitated solid separated was filtered and recrystallized from ethyl acetate. Crystals of (I) suitable for X-ray diffraction were obtained by slow evaporation of ethyl acetate at room temperature. 1H NMR (DMSO, δ, p.p.m.) 11.39 (s, 1 H), 8.17 (s, 1 H), 8.02 (s,2 H), 7.42 (m, 1 H), 7.30 (t, 2 H), 6.99 (t,1 H), 1.79 (t, 3 H).

Refinement

All H atoms were positioned geometrically, with C—H = 0.93 Å and N—H = 0.86 °, and constrained to ride on their parent atoms, with Uiso(H) = xUeq(C), where x= 1.5 for methyl H and x = 1.2 for methylene H atoms.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Molecular structure of (I) showing the atom-numbering scheme and 30% displacement ellipsoids. The intramolecular hydrogen bond is shown as dashed lines.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Crystal packing of (I). Hydrogen bonds are drawn as dashed lines.

Crystal data

C9H11N3S F(000) = 408
Mr = 193.27 Dx = 1.227 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/c Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc Cell parameters from 27 reflections
a = 13.234 (3) Å θ = 1–25°
b = 8.221 (2) Å µ = 0.27 mm1
c = 10.311 (2) Å T = 293 K
β = 111.15 (3)° Block, colorless
V = 1046.2 (4) Å3 0.30 × 0.20 × 0.10 mm
Z = 4

Data collection

Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer 1322 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube Rint = 0.032
graphite θmax = 25.3°, θmin = 1.7°
ω/2θ scans h = −15→0
Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968) k = 0→9
Tmin = 0.924, Tmax = 0.974 l = −11→12
1982 measured reflections 3 standard reflections every 200 reflections
1898 independent reflections intensity decay: 9%

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.052 H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.146 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.07P)2 + 0.38P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.00 (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1898 reflections Δρmax = 0.26 e Å3
120 parameters Δρmin = −0.20 e Å3
0 restraints Extinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods Extinction coefficient: 0.034 (4)

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
S 0.48277 (7) 0.09017 (9) 0.81196 (7) 0.0534 (3)
N1 0.34064 (18) −0.0455 (3) 0.4236 (2) 0.0438 (6)
C1 −0.0005 (3) −0.2600 (6) −0.1894 (3) 0.0788 (12)
H1B −0.0374 −0.3614 −0.1934 0.118*
H1C 0.0324 −0.2593 −0.2585 0.118*
H1D −0.0514 −0.1721 −0.2067 0.118*
N2 0.40264 (19) −0.0458 (3) 0.5647 (2) 0.0456 (6)
H2A 0.4275 −0.1358 0.6065 0.055*
C2 0.0863 (3) −0.2397 (5) −0.0467 (3) 0.0560 (9)
N3 0.3955 (2) 0.2299 (3) 0.5633 (3) 0.0630 (8)
H3A 0.3650 0.2263 0.4743 0.076*
H3B 0.4078 0.3222 0.6054 0.076*
C3 0.1264 (3) −0.0877 (4) 0.0043 (3) 0.0614 (9)
H3C 0.1006 0.0034 −0.0513 0.074*
C4 0.2041 (3) −0.0681 (4) 0.1365 (3) 0.0553 (8)
H4A 0.2302 0.0352 0.1678 0.066*
C5 0.2429 (2) −0.2018 (4) 0.2222 (3) 0.0445 (7)
C6 0.2060 (2) −0.3553 (4) 0.1705 (3) 0.0521 (8)
H6A 0.2329 −0.4465 0.2255 0.063*
C7 0.1289 (3) −0.3741 (4) 0.0370 (3) 0.0565 (9)
H7A 0.1056 −0.4779 0.0036 0.068*
C8 0.3157 (2) −0.1842 (4) 0.3664 (3) 0.0452 (7)
H8A 0.3446 −0.2770 0.4180 0.054*
C9 0.4235 (2) 0.0939 (3) 0.6353 (3) 0.0420 (7)

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
S 0.0798 (6) 0.0472 (5) 0.0282 (4) −0.0056 (4) 0.0134 (4) −0.0039 (3)
N1 0.0512 (15) 0.0501 (15) 0.0282 (11) −0.0033 (11) 0.0121 (10) −0.0016 (10)
C1 0.071 (2) 0.116 (3) 0.0399 (18) −0.014 (2) 0.0086 (17) −0.015 (2)
N2 0.0603 (16) 0.0443 (14) 0.0268 (11) −0.0011 (12) 0.0094 (11) −0.0010 (10)
C2 0.0497 (19) 0.081 (2) 0.0362 (16) −0.0065 (17) 0.0143 (14) −0.0080 (16)
N3 0.100 (2) 0.0425 (15) 0.0339 (13) 0.0016 (14) 0.0082 (14) −0.0005 (11)
C3 0.068 (2) 0.067 (2) 0.0419 (17) −0.0007 (18) 0.0119 (16) 0.0070 (16)
C4 0.064 (2) 0.055 (2) 0.0386 (16) −0.0061 (16) 0.0082 (14) −0.0039 (14)
C5 0.0452 (17) 0.0530 (18) 0.0342 (14) −0.0006 (14) 0.0131 (12) −0.0056 (13)
C6 0.0556 (19) 0.0562 (19) 0.0423 (17) −0.0015 (15) 0.0151 (14) −0.0060 (15)
C7 0.057 (2) 0.066 (2) 0.0451 (17) −0.0113 (16) 0.0169 (15) −0.0190 (16)
C8 0.0516 (18) 0.0476 (18) 0.0332 (14) 0.0002 (14) 0.0115 (13) −0.0019 (13)
C9 0.0492 (17) 0.0438 (16) 0.0320 (14) −0.0015 (13) 0.0135 (12) −0.0018 (13)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

S—C9 1.704 (3) N3—H3A 0.8600
N1—C8 1.271 (4) N3—H3B 0.8600
N1—N2 1.389 (3) C3—C4 1.390 (4)
C1—C2 1.514 (4) C3—H3C 0.9300
C1—H1B 0.9600 C4—C5 1.387 (4)
C1—H1C 0.9600 C4—H4A 0.9300
C1—H1D 0.9600 C5—C6 1.388 (4)
N2—C9 1.334 (3) C5—C8 1.458 (4)
N2—H2A 0.8600 C6—C7 1.395 (4)
C2—C3 1.385 (5) C6—H6A 0.9300
C2—C7 1.390 (5) C7—H7A 0.9300
N3—C9 1.319 (3) C8—H8A 0.9300
C8—N1—N2 116.1 (2) C5—C4—C3 120.4 (3)
C2—C1—H1B 109.5 C5—C4—H4A 119.8
C2—C1—H1C 109.5 C3—C4—H4A 119.8
H1B—C1—H1C 109.5 C4—C5—C6 118.5 (3)
C2—C1—H1D 109.5 C4—C5—C8 121.9 (3)
H1B—C1—H1D 109.5 C6—C5—C8 119.5 (3)
H1C—C1—H1D 109.5 C5—C6—C7 120.7 (3)
C9—N2—N1 119.9 (2) C5—C6—H6A 119.7
C9—N2—H2A 120.1 C7—C6—H6A 119.7
N1—N2—H2A 120.1 C2—C7—C6 120.8 (3)
C3—C2—C7 117.9 (3) C2—C7—H7A 119.6
C3—C2—C1 121.4 (3) C6—C7—H7A 119.6
C7—C2—C1 120.8 (3) N1—C8—C5 121.8 (3)
C9—N3—H3A 120.0 N1—C8—H8A 119.1
C9—N3—H3B 120.0 C5—C8—H8A 119.1
H3A—N3—H3B 120.0 N3—C9—N2 117.5 (2)
C2—C3—C4 121.6 (3) N3—C9—S 123.0 (2)
C2—C3—H3C 119.2 N2—C9—S 119.5 (2)
C4—C3—H3C 119.2
C8—N1—N2—C9 −173.6 (3) C3—C2—C7—C6 2.8 (5)
C7—C2—C3—C4 −2.1 (5) C1—C2—C7—C6 −177.7 (3)
C1—C2—C3—C4 178.4 (3) C5—C6—C7—C2 −0.8 (5)
C2—C3—C4—C5 −0.7 (5) N2—N1—C8—C5 174.4 (2)
C3—C4—C5—C6 2.8 (5) C4—C5—C8—N1 5.3 (5)
C3—C4—C5—C8 −173.4 (3) C6—C5—C8—N1 −170.9 (3)
C4—C5—C6—C7 −2.0 (5) N1—N2—C9—N3 −8.5 (4)
C8—C5—C6—C7 174.2 (3) N1—N2—C9—S 170.71 (19)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
N3—H3A···N1 0.86 2.29 2.641 (4) 105
N2—H2A···Si 0.86 2.54 3.389 (3) 168
N3—H3B···Sii 0.86 2.61 3.395 (3) 153

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, y−1/2, −z+3/2; (ii) −x+1, y+1/2, −z+3/2.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: IM2136).

References

  1. Allen, F. H., Kennard, O., Watson, D. G., Brammer, L., Orpen, A. G. & Taylor, R. (1987). J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, pp. S1–19.
  2. Casas, J. S., Garcia-Tasende, M. S. & Sordo, J. (2000). Coord. Chem. Rev.209, 197–261.
  3. Chimenti, F., Maccioni, E., Secci, D., Bolasco, A., Chimenti, P., Granese, A., Befani, O., Turini, P., Alcaro, S., Ortuso, F., Cardia, M. C. & Distinto, S. (2007). J. Med. Chem.50, 707–712. [DOI] [PubMed]
  4. Deschamps, P., Kulkarni, P. P. & Sarkar, B. (2003). Inorg. Chem.42, 7366–7368. [DOI] [PubMed]
  5. Enraf–Nonius (1989). CAD-4 Software Enraf–Nonius, Delft, The Netherlands.
  6. Ferrari, M. B., Capacchi, S., Reffo, G., Pelosi, G., Tarasconi, P., Albertini, R., Pinelli, S. & Lunghi, P. (2000). J. Inorg. Biochem.81, 89–97. [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. Harms, K. & Wocadlo, S. (1995). XCAD4 University of Marburg, Germany.
  8. Maccioni, E., Cardia, M. C., Distinto, S., Bonsignore, L. & De Logu, A. (2003). Farmaco, 58, 951–959. [DOI] [PubMed]
  9. North, A. C. T., Phillips, D. C. & Mathews, F. S. (1968). Acta Cryst. A24, 351–359.
  10. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  11. Tarafder, M. T. H., Ali, M. A., Wee, D. J., Azahari, K., Silong, S. & Crouse, K. A. (2000). Transition Met. Chem.25, 456–460.
  12. Zhang, J., Wu, L., Zhuang, L. & Wang, G. (2009). Acta Cryst. E65, o884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809033297/im2136sup1.cif

e-65-o2244-sup1.cif (15.5KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809033297/im2136Isup2.hkl

e-65-o2244-Isup2.hkl (93.4KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES