Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2009 Aug 8;65(Pt 9):o2123–o2124. doi: 10.1107/S1600536809030840

(2RS)-3-Hydr­oxy-2-methyl-2-(2-pyrid­yl)imidazolidine-4-one

Turganbay S Iskenderov a, Irina A Golenya b, Elźbieta Gumienna-Kontecka c, Igor O Fritsky b, Elena V Prisyazhnaya d,*
PMCID: PMC2970069  PMID: 21577537

Abstract

The title structure, C9H11N3O2, is a racemate. The chiral centre is situated at the N—C—N C atom of the imidazolidine ring. The inter­planar angle between the mean planes of the pyridine and imidazolidine rings is 89.41 (5)°. The methyl group is in a trans position with respect to the pyridine N atom. In the crystal, the mol­ecules are arranged in zigzag layers parallel to the b axis. The mol­ecules within the layers are inter­connected by strong O—H⋯N and weak N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds; the former take place between OH groups and amine N atoms and the latter between the amine N atom and the carbonyl O atom. In addition, C—H⋯O inter­actions are also present.

Related literature

For background to hydroxamic acids in biological and coord­ination chemistry, see: Miller (1989); Lipczynska-Kochany (1991); Kurzak et al. (1992); Whittaker et al. (1999). For reactions of α-amino hydroxamic acids with aldehydes and ketones resulting in 3-hydroxy­imidazolidin-4-one derivatives, see: Vystorop et al. (2002, 2003); Marson & Pucci (2004). For related structures, see: Krämer & Fritsky (2000); Świątek-Kozłowska et al. (2000); Krämer et al. (2002); Kovbasyuk et al. (2004). For the synthesis, see: Cunningham et al. (1949). For hydrogen bonds, see: Desiraju & Steiner (1999).graphic file with name e-65-o2123-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • C9H11N3O2

  • M r = 193.21

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 8.207 (2) Å

  • b = 10.604 (2) Å

  • c = 10.642 (2) Å

  • β = 106.43 (3)°

  • V = 888.3 (3) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.11 mm−1

  • T = 100 K

  • 0.25 × 0.17 × 0.12 mm

Data collection

  • Kuma KM-4-CCD diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis RED, Oxford Diffraction, 2006) T min = 0.976, T max = 0.986

  • 6025 measured reflections

  • 2048 independent reflections

  • 1772 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.020

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.039

  • wR(F 2) = 0.092

  • S = 1.12

  • 2048 reflections

  • 137 parameters

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 0.31 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.21 e Å−3

Data collection: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2006); cell refinement: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2006); data reduction: CrysAlis RED; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809030840/fb2163sup1.cif

e-65-o2123-sup1.cif (16.7KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809030840/fb2163Isup2.hkl

e-65-o2123-Isup2.hkl (100.8KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O1—H1O⋯N1i 0.95 (2) 1.78 (2) 2.7287 (16) 175.5 (18)
N1—H1N⋯O2ii 0.874 (17) 2.135 (18) 3.0058 (15) 173.7 (15)
C6—H6⋯O1iii 0.93 2.47 3.2867 (17) 147
C7—H7⋯O2iii 0.93 2.81 3.3559 (17) 119
C8—H8⋯O2iv 0.93 2.80 3.4177 (17) 125

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic; (iii) Inline graphic; (iv) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine for financial support (grant No. M/42–2008).

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

Hydroxamic acids are important bioligands possessing a wide spectrum of biological activities (Lipczynska-Kochany, 1991). Notably, they have a high affinity to the transition metal ions (Kurzak et al., 1992). For example, naturally occurring hydroxamate siderophores are strong Fe(III) chelators (Miller, 1989). Hydroxamic acids are also efficient metalloenzyme inhibitors, e.g. urease and matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors (Whittaker et al., 1999).

These properties have provoked current interest in the development of novel synthetic routes for preparation of new selective hydroxamate chelating agents and siderophore mimics. Recently it was found that the reactions of α-amino hydroxamic acids with aldehydes and ketons do not result in the open-chain Schiff base hydroxamic acids but afford five-membered cyclic products containing residues of 3-hydroxyimidazolidine-4-one (Marson & Pucci, 2004; Vystorop et al., 2002; Vystorop et al., 2003). Here we describe a crystal structure of the title structure, 2-methyl-2-(pyridine-2-yl)-3-hydroxyimidazolidine-4-one, obtained as a result of the condensation of glycine hydroxamic acid and 2-acetylpyridine.

The molecules of the title structure are interconnected by the H-bonds. The molecules contain a chiral centre at the C2 atom (Fig. 1) and the structure is a racemate. The molecule is not planar: the interplanar angle between the mean planes of the pyridine and imidazolidine rings equals to 89.41 (5)°. The imidazolidine ring exhibits the envelope conformation: the C2 atom is displaced by 0.320 (2) Å out of the mean plane defined by four other atoms of the ring. The methyl group is in the trans-position with respect to the pyridine nitrogen.

The bond lengths C—O, N—O and C—N in the hydroxamic function suggest the presence of the hydroxamic function in the hydroxamic form rather than in the oximic one (Świątek-Kozłowska et al., 2000). The C—N and C—C bond lengths within the pyridine ring are normal for 2-substituted pyridine derivatives (Krämer & Fritsky, 2000; Krämer et al., 2002; Kovbasyuk et al., 2004).

In the crystal packing, the molecules are arranged into zig-zagged layers by the O1—H···N2 and N2—H···O2 hydrogen bonds. These layers are parallel to the axis b. The former one takes place between NOH group and it is considered as a strong hydrogen bond (Desiraju & Steiner, 1999) while the latter one between the amine nitrogen and the carbonyl oxygen atom (Fig. 2) is considered as weak one (Desiraju & Steiner, 1999). Moreover, the mentioned layers are interconnected by C—H···O H-bonds (Tab. 1).

Experimental

A suspension of glycine hydroxamic acid (0.9 g, 10 mmol) and 2-acetylpyridine (12 mmol) in 30 ml of 96% aqueous ethanol was refluxed for at 78°C for 1-2 h. The hot reaction mixture was filtered, the filtrate produced a white precipitate on cooling. The precipitate was filtered, air-dried and recrystallized from absolute ethanol to yield the title structure as colourless prismatic crystals of average size 0.25 × 0.15 × 0.15 mm. The reagent, glycine hydroxamic acid, was prepared according to the procedure described by Cunningham et al. (1949).

Refinement

All the H-atoms were discernible in the difference electron density map. The coordinates and the isotropic displacement parameters of the hydroxyl and amine hydrogens that are involved in the strongest hydrogen bonds have been refined. The hydrogens with C atoms as their carriers were situated into the idealized positions and constrained: C—H = 0.93, 0.96 and 0.97 Å for aryl, methyl and methylene hydrogens; UisoHaryl/methylene=1.2UeqCaryl/methylene, UisoHmethyl=1.5UeqCmethyl. The methyl H atoms have been refined with AFIX 137 [SHELXL98 (Sheldrick, 2008] so their positions with regard to the electron density maps have been optimized.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

A view of the (2R)-enantiomer of the title compound, with the displacement ellipsoids shown at the 50% probability level.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

A packing diagram of the title compound. Oxygen and nitrogen atoms are depicted as larger (hatched) and smaller (dotted) circles, respectively. The O-H···N and N-H···O hydrogen bonds are indicated by the dashed lines. The H atoms not involved in the hydrogen bonding have been omitted for the sake of clarity.

Crystal data

C9H11N3O2 F(000) = 408
Mr = 193.21 Dx = 1.445 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/c Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc Cell parameters from 505 reflections
a = 8.207 (2) Å θ = 4.5–27.0°
b = 10.604 (2) Å µ = 0.11 mm1
c = 10.642 (2) Å T = 100 K
β = 106.43 (3)° Block, colourless
V = 888.3 (3) Å3 0.25 × 0.17 × 0.12 mm
Z = 4

Data collection

Kuma KM-4-CCD diffractometer 2048 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 1772 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphite Rint = 0.020
ω scans θmax = 28.4°, θmin = 3.4°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis RED, Oxford Diffraction, 2006) h = −10→10
Tmin = 0.976, Tmax = 0.986 k = −12→14
6025 measured reflections l = −10→13

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.039 H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.092 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0423P)2 + 0.2114P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.12 (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
2048 reflections Δρmax = 0.31 e Å3
137 parameters Δρmin = −0.21 e Å3
0 restraints Extinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
35 constraints Extinction coefficient: 0.011 (3)
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
O1 0.16520 (11) 0.16310 (8) 0.36523 (9) 0.0161 (2)
O2 0.40231 (11) 0.01414 (8) 0.28974 (9) 0.0197 (2)
N1 0.33317 (13) 0.31162 (10) 0.12474 (10) 0.0143 (2)
N2 0.02391 (13) 0.16898 (10) 0.05476 (10) 0.0162 (2)
N3 0.27351 (13) 0.20590 (10) 0.29470 (10) 0.0135 (2)
C1 0.21832 (17) 0.43456 (12) 0.27885 (13) 0.0175 (3)
H1A 0.1455 0.4293 0.3351 0.026*
H1B 0.1815 0.5026 0.2179 0.026*
H1C 0.3330 0.4496 0.3307 0.026*
C2 0.21024 (15) 0.31194 (11) 0.20447 (11) 0.0137 (3)
C3 0.03258 (15) 0.27995 (11) 0.11645 (11) 0.0137 (3)
C4 0.36622 (15) 0.12145 (12) 0.24864 (12) 0.0147 (3)
C5 0.41829 (16) 0.18664 (12) 0.14047 (12) 0.0167 (3)
H5A 0.5407 0.1966 0.1638 0.020*
H5B 0.3818 0.1385 0.0598 0.020*
C6 −0.10579 (17) 0.36021 (12) 0.09906 (13) 0.0184 (3)
H6 −0.0958 0.4360 0.1446 0.022*
C7 −0.25965 (17) 0.32455 (13) 0.01199 (13) 0.0206 (3)
H7 −0.3546 0.3762 −0.0018 0.025*
C8 −0.26922 (16) 0.21144 (13) −0.05353 (13) 0.0196 (3)
H8 −0.3702 0.1859 −0.1130 0.023*
C9 −0.12508 (16) 0.13664 (12) −0.02886 (12) 0.0177 (3)
H9 −0.1323 0.0601 −0.0727 0.021*
H1O 0.229 (3) 0.1711 (18) 0.454 (2) 0.049 (6)*
H1N 0.409 (2) 0.3703 (16) 0.1556 (15) 0.023 (4)*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
O1 0.0174 (5) 0.0199 (5) 0.0126 (4) −0.0039 (3) 0.0067 (4) 0.0010 (3)
O2 0.0196 (5) 0.0154 (5) 0.0233 (5) 0.0026 (3) 0.0050 (4) 0.0021 (4)
N1 0.0146 (5) 0.0152 (5) 0.0135 (5) −0.0028 (4) 0.0049 (4) −0.0007 (4)
N2 0.0169 (5) 0.0145 (5) 0.0166 (5) −0.0009 (4) 0.0040 (4) −0.0016 (4)
N3 0.0147 (5) 0.0148 (5) 0.0117 (5) −0.0010 (4) 0.0052 (4) 0.0016 (4)
C1 0.0208 (7) 0.0143 (6) 0.0172 (6) −0.0012 (5) 0.0052 (5) −0.0020 (5)
C2 0.0165 (6) 0.0132 (6) 0.0118 (6) 0.0003 (4) 0.0046 (5) 0.0010 (4)
C3 0.0162 (6) 0.0139 (6) 0.0117 (6) −0.0012 (4) 0.0050 (5) 0.0011 (4)
C4 0.0111 (6) 0.0170 (6) 0.0139 (6) −0.0022 (4) −0.0001 (4) −0.0033 (5)
C5 0.0161 (6) 0.0186 (6) 0.0160 (6) 0.0012 (5) 0.0057 (5) −0.0010 (5)
C6 0.0211 (7) 0.0155 (6) 0.0187 (6) 0.0025 (5) 0.0060 (5) −0.0019 (5)
C7 0.0173 (7) 0.0221 (7) 0.0216 (7) 0.0063 (5) 0.0042 (5) 0.0027 (5)
C8 0.0156 (6) 0.0236 (7) 0.0171 (6) −0.0009 (5) 0.0008 (5) 0.0017 (5)
C9 0.0194 (7) 0.0161 (6) 0.0167 (6) −0.0022 (5) 0.0036 (5) −0.0029 (5)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

O1—N3 1.3917 (13) C1—H1C 0.9600
O1—H1O 0.95 (2) C2—C3 1.5316 (18)
O2—C4 1.2250 (16) C3—C6 1.3891 (17)
N1—C5 1.4854 (16) C4—C5 1.5047 (17)
N1—C2 1.4907 (16) C5—H5A 0.9700
N1—H1N 0.874 (17) C5—H5B 0.9700
N2—C9 1.3376 (17) C6—C7 1.3908 (19)
N2—C3 1.3395 (16) C6—H6 0.9300
N3—C4 1.3536 (16) C7—C8 1.3783 (19)
N3—C2 1.4744 (16) C7—H7 0.9300
C1—C2 1.5139 (17) C8—C9 1.3863 (19)
C1—H1A 0.9600 C8—H8 0.9300
C1—H1B 0.9600 C9—H9 0.9300
N3—O1—H1O 104.8 (12) C6—C3—C2 123.14 (11)
C5—N1—C2 108.08 (9) O2—C4—N3 126.10 (12)
C5—N1—H1N 109.4 (11) O2—C4—C5 127.42 (11)
C2—N1—H1N 107.8 (10) N3—C4—C5 106.47 (11)
C9—N2—C3 117.59 (11) N1—C5—C4 105.65 (10)
C4—N3—O1 119.32 (10) N1—C5—H5A 110.6
C4—N3—C2 113.53 (10) C4—C5—H5A 110.6
O1—N3—C2 116.04 (9) N1—C5—H5B 110.6
C2—C1—H1A 109.5 C4—C5—H5B 110.6
C2—C1—H1B 109.5 H5A—C5—H5B 108.7
H1A—C1—H1B 109.5 C3—C6—C7 118.43 (12)
C2—C1—H1C 109.5 C3—C6—H6 120.8
H1A—C1—H1C 109.5 C7—C6—H6 120.8
H1B—C1—H1C 109.5 C8—C7—C6 119.00 (12)
N3—C2—N1 101.45 (9) C8—C7—H7 120.5
N3—C2—C1 111.05 (10) C6—C7—H7 120.5
N1—C2—C1 111.28 (10) C7—C8—C9 118.60 (12)
N3—C2—C3 109.17 (10) C7—C8—H8 120.7
N1—C2—C3 109.38 (9) C9—C8—H8 120.7
C1—C2—C3 113.79 (10) N2—C9—C8 123.35 (12)
N2—C3—C6 123.02 (12) N2—C9—H9 118.3
N2—C3—C2 113.82 (10) C8—C9—H9 118.3
C4—N3—C2—N1 −23.00 (12) N1—C2—C3—C6 −120.73 (13)
O1—N3—C2—N1 −166.82 (9) C1—C2—C3—C6 4.41 (17)
C4—N3—C2—C1 −141.35 (11) O1—N3—C4—O2 −21.10 (17)
O1—N3—C2—C1 74.84 (13) C2—N3—C4—O2 −163.63 (11)
C4—N3—C2—C3 92.40 (12) O1—N3—C4—C5 160.17 (9)
O1—N3—C2—C3 −51.42 (13) C2—N3—C4—C5 17.65 (13)
C5—N1—C2—N3 18.56 (12) C2—N1—C5—C4 −9.58 (12)
C5—N1—C2—C1 136.75 (10) O2—C4—C5—N1 176.85 (11)
C5—N1—C2—C3 −96.68 (11) N3—C4—C5—N1 −4.45 (13)
C9—N2—C3—C6 1.26 (18) N2—C3—C6—C7 −1.06 (19)
C9—N2—C3—C2 −176.93 (11) C2—C3—C6—C7 176.96 (11)
N3—C2—C3—N2 −52.74 (13) C3—C6—C7—C8 0.01 (19)
N1—C2—C3—N2 57.46 (13) C6—C7—C8—C9 0.7 (2)
C1—C2—C3—N2 −177.41 (10) C3—N2—C9—C8 −0.43 (19)
N3—C2—C3—C6 129.08 (12) C7—C8—C9—N2 −0.6 (2)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
O1—H1O···N1i 0.95 (2) 1.78 (2) 2.7287 (16) 175.5 (18)
N1—H1N···O2ii 0.874 (17) 2.135 (18) 3.0058 (15) 173.7 (15)
C6—H6···O1iii 0.93 2.47 3.2867 (17) 147
C7—H7···O2iii 0.93 2.81 3.3559 (17) 119
C8—H8···O2iv 0.93 2.80 3.4177 (17) 125

Symmetry codes: (i) x, −y+1/2, z+1/2; (ii) −x+1, y+1/2, −z+1/2; (iii) −x, y+1/2, −z+1/2; (iv) −x, −y, −z.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: FB2163).

References

  1. Cunningham, K. G., Newbold, G. T., Spring, F. S. & Stark, J. (1949). J. Chem. Soc. pp. 2091–2096.
  2. Desiraju, G. R. & Steiner, T. (1999). The Weak Hydrogen Bond in Structural Chemistry and Biology, p. 13. International Union of Crystallography Monographs on Crystallography. New York: Oxford Science Publications.
  3. Farrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst.30, 565.
  4. Farrugia, L. J. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst.32, 837–838.
  5. Kovbasyuk, L., Pritzkow, H., Krämer, R. & Fritsky, I. O. (2004). Chem. Commun. pp. 880–881. [DOI] [PubMed]
  6. Krämer, R. & Fritsky, I. O. (2000). Eur. J. Org. Chem. pp. 3505–3510.
  7. Krämer, R., Fritsky, I. O., Pritzkow, H. & Kovbasyuk, L. A. (2002). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 1307–1314.
  8. Kurzak, B., Kozłowski, H. & Farkas, E. (1992). Coord. Chem. Rev.114, 169–188.
  9. Lipczynska-Kochany, E. (1991). Chem. Rev.91, 477–495.
  10. Marson, C. M. & Pucci, S. (2004). Tetrahedron Lett.45, 9007–9012.
  11. Miller, M. J. (1989). Chem. Rev.89, 1563-1590.
  12. Oxford Diffraction (2006). CrysAlis CCD and CrysAlis RED Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Abingdon, England.
  13. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  14. Świątek-Kozłowska, J., Fritsky, I. O., Dobosz, A., Karaczyn, A., Dudarenko, N. M., Sliva, T. Yu., Gumienna-Kontecka, E. & Jerzykiewicz, L. (2000). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 4064–4068.
  15. Vystorop, I. V., Lyssenko, K. A. & Kostyanovsky, R. G. (2002). Mendeleev Commun. pp. 85–86.
  16. Vystorop, I. V., Lyssenko, K. A., Kostyanovsky, R. G. & Remir, G. (2003). Mendeleev Commun pp. 116–117.
  17. Whittaker, M., Floyd, C. D., Brown, P. & Gearing, A. J. H. (1999). Chem. Rev.99, 2735–2762. [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809030840/fb2163sup1.cif

e-65-o2123-sup1.cif (16.7KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809030840/fb2163Isup2.hkl

e-65-o2123-Isup2.hkl (100.8KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES