Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2009 Sep 26;65(Pt 10):o2513. doi: 10.1107/S1600536809037271

2-Amino-4-methyl­benzene­sulfonamide

Shao-Song Qian a,*, Hao Hu a, Hong-You Cui b
PMCID: PMC2970282  PMID: 21577960

Abstract

In the crystal of the title compound, C7H10N2O2S, the mol­ecules are linked by two strong N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. The mol­ecular structure is stabilized by an intra­molecular N—H⋯O hydrogen bond. The C/S/N plane makes a dihedral angle of 69.7 (2)° with the aromatic ring plane.

Related literature

For the anti­convulsant activity of the title compound and its derivatives, see: Monzani et al. (1985); Tait et al. (1993). For hydrogen-bond motifs, see: Bernstein et al. (1995).graphic file with name e-65-o2513-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • C7H10N2O2S

  • M r = 186.23

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 9.873 (5) Å

  • b = 9.151 (4) Å

  • c = 10.408 (5) Å

  • β = 114.689 (6)°

  • V = 854.4 (7) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.34 mm−1

  • T = 273 K

  • 0.16 × 0.13 × 0.10 mm

Data collection

  • Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) T min = 0.948, T max = 0.967

  • 4115 measured reflections

  • 1449 independent reflections

  • 1338 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.017

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.047

  • wR(F 2) = 0.132

  • S = 1.10

  • 1449 reflections

  • 110 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.56 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.41 e Å−3

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2004); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2004); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809037271/bx2239sup1.cif

e-65-o2513-sup1.cif (14KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809037271/bx2239Isup2.hkl

e-65-o2513-Isup2.hkl (71.5KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N2—H2B⋯O2i 0.86 2.15 3.003 (4) 174
N2—H2A⋯O1ii 0.86 2.27 2.975 (4) 139
N1—H1B⋯O2 0.86 2.60 3.080 (5) 117

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

This project was sponsored by the ShanDong Province Science & Technology Innovation Foundation.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

The title compound (I), Figure1, was prepared and tested for anticonvulsant activity in mice, (Monzani, et al.,1985). In addition, its derivatives was studied using indomethacin as a reference drug (Tait, et al.,1993). We report here its crystal and molecular structure. The molecules are linked by two strong N—H···O generating a graph-set motif R44(16) ring (Bernstein, et al., 1995) and is stabilized by one N—H···O intramolecular hydrogen bonds (Table1, Figure 2). The C2/S1/N2 plane makes a dihedral angle of 69.7 (2)° with the aromatic ring plane.

Experimental

The title compound was synthesized according to method described by Monzani, et al.,1985.The single crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction were obtained by spontaneous evaporation of the solvent.

Refinement

All the H atoms attached to C atoms were placed in geometrical positions and constrained to ride on their parent atoms with C—H distance in the range 0.93–0.98 Å, They were treated as riding atoms, with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C).

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The structure of (I), showing the atom-labelling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 35% probability level.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

A portion of the packing diagram for (I) showing graph-set motif R44(16) ring. For the sake clarity the atoms not involved in the motif shown have been omitted Symmetry codes: (i) x, -y+1/2, z+1/2; (ii)-x,y+1/2,-z+3/2.

Crystal data

C7H10N2O2S F(000) = 392
Mr = 186.23 Dx = 1.448 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/c Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc Cell parameters from 3354 reflections
a = 9.873 (5) Å θ = 2.2–28.2°
b = 9.151 (4) Å µ = 0.34 mm1
c = 10.408 (5) Å T = 273 K
β = 114.689 (6)° Block, colorless
V = 854.4 (7) Å3 0.16 × 0.13 × 0.10 mm
Z = 4

Data collection

Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer 1449 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 1338 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphite Rint = 0.017
φ and ω scans θmax = 25.1°, θmin = 3.1°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) h = −11→11
Tmin = 0.948, Tmax = 0.967 k = −10→10
4115 measured reflections l = −12→9

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.047 H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.132 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0721P)2 + 0.701P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.10 (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1449 reflections Δρmax = 0.56 e Å3
110 parameters Δρmin = −0.41 e Å3
0 restraints Extinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods Extinction coefficient: 0.047 (9)

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
S1 0.13944 (9) 0.19821 (9) 0.76214 (8) 0.0361 (4)
O1 0.1511 (3) 0.0560 (3) 0.8246 (3) 0.0533 (8)
O2 0.0800 (3) 0.2040 (4) 0.6109 (3) 0.0603 (9)
N1 0.2315 (4) 0.5060 (4) 0.6773 (4) 0.0604 (10)
H1A 0.2566 0.5867 0.6510 0.073*
H1B 0.1391 0.4815 0.6450 0.073*
N2 0.0260 (3) 0.2896 (3) 0.8048 (3) 0.0412 (7)
H2A −0.0514 0.3293 0.7402 0.049*
H2B 0.0426 0.2990 0.8924 0.049*
C1 0.3488 (4) 0.4078 (4) 0.7793 (3) 0.0357 (7)
C2 0.3186 (3) 0.2754 (4) 0.8318 (3) 0.0342 (7)
C3 0.4324 (4) 0.1967 (4) 0.9361 (4) 0.0396 (8)
H3 0.4098 0.1121 0.9727 0.048*
C4 0.5787 (4) 0.2433 (4) 0.9859 (4) 0.0443 (9)
H4 0.6543 0.1920 1.0571 0.053*
C5 0.6107 (3) 0.3669 (4) 0.9282 (4) 0.0417 (8)
C6 0.4979 (4) 0.4501 (4) 0.8300 (4) 0.0406 (8)
H6 0.5221 0.5362 0.7969 0.049*
C7 0.7610 (3) 0.4151 (5) 0.9737 (4) 0.0497 (9)
H7A 0.7795 0.4947 1.0389 0.074*
H7B 0.7771 0.4471 0.8933 0.074*
H7C 0.8276 0.3360 1.0193 0.074*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
S1 0.0355 (6) 0.0364 (6) 0.0356 (6) −0.0058 (3) 0.0140 (4) −0.0071 (3)
O1 0.0470 (15) 0.0348 (14) 0.0722 (18) −0.0059 (11) 0.0191 (13) −0.0030 (12)
O2 0.0540 (16) 0.086 (2) 0.0376 (14) −0.0211 (14) 0.0163 (12) −0.0185 (13)
N1 0.056 (2) 0.063 (2) 0.062 (2) 0.0026 (16) 0.0245 (17) 0.0197 (17)
N2 0.0373 (16) 0.0455 (17) 0.0419 (15) 0.0014 (12) 0.0174 (13) 0.0004 (12)
C1 0.0368 (16) 0.0390 (17) 0.0348 (15) 0.0007 (13) 0.0184 (13) −0.0019 (13)
C2 0.0329 (16) 0.0357 (16) 0.0352 (16) −0.0012 (12) 0.0155 (13) −0.0053 (12)
C3 0.0414 (18) 0.0327 (17) 0.0435 (18) 0.0024 (13) 0.0165 (15) 0.0001 (13)
C4 0.0360 (18) 0.0431 (19) 0.0474 (19) 0.0067 (14) 0.0109 (15) −0.0027 (16)
C5 0.0313 (17) 0.047 (2) 0.0467 (18) −0.0029 (14) 0.0165 (14) −0.0113 (15)
C6 0.0395 (17) 0.0420 (18) 0.0443 (18) −0.0051 (14) 0.0213 (15) −0.0005 (15)
C7 0.0246 (16) 0.058 (2) 0.062 (2) −0.0056 (15) 0.0139 (16) −0.0010 (18)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

S1—O2 1.433 (3) C2—C3 1.393 (5)
S1—O1 1.438 (3) C3—C4 1.383 (5)
S1—N2 1.602 (3) C3—H3 0.9300
S1—C2 1.756 (3) C4—C5 1.378 (6)
N1—C1 1.500 (5) C4—H4 0.9300
N1—H1A 0.8600 C5—C6 1.383 (5)
N1—H1B 0.8600 C5—C7 1.426 (4)
N2—H2A 0.8600 C6—H6 0.9300
N2—H2B 0.8600 C7—H7A 0.9600
C1—C6 1.395 (5) C7—H7B 0.9600
C1—C2 1.412 (5) C7—H7C 0.9600
O2—S1—O1 116.68 (18) C4—C3—C2 120.6 (3)
O2—S1—N2 105.80 (18) C4—C3—H3 119.7
O1—S1—N2 106.29 (16) C2—C3—H3 119.7
O2—S1—C2 108.58 (16) C5—C4—C3 118.9 (3)
O1—S1—C2 107.49 (16) C5—C4—H4 120.5
N2—S1—C2 112.08 (16) C3—C4—H4 120.5
C1—N1—H1A 120.0 C4—C5—C6 120.9 (3)
C1—N1—H1B 120.0 C4—C5—C7 120.3 (3)
H1A—N1—H1B 120.0 C6—C5—C7 118.7 (4)
S1—N2—H2A 120.0 C5—C6—C1 121.5 (3)
S1—N2—H2B 120.0 C5—C6—H6 119.2
H2A—N2—H2B 120.0 C1—C6—H6 119.2
C6—C1—C2 116.9 (3) C5—C7—H7A 109.5
C6—C1—N1 118.9 (3) C5—C7—H7B 109.5
C2—C1—N1 124.3 (3) H7A—C7—H7B 109.5
C3—C2—C1 120.9 (3) C5—C7—H7C 109.5
C3—C2—S1 117.4 (3) H7A—C7—H7C 109.5
C1—C2—S1 121.6 (3) H7B—C7—H7C 109.5

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
N2—H2B···O2i 0.86 2.15 3.003 (4) 174
N2—H2A···O1ii 0.86 2.27 2.975 (4) 139
N1—H1B···O2 0.86 2.60 3.080 (5) 117

Symmetry codes: (i) x, −y+1/2, z+1/2; (ii) −x, y+1/2, −z+3/2.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: BX2239).

References

  1. Bernstein, J., Davis, R. E., Shimoni, L. & Chang, N.-L. (1995). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.34, 1555–1573.
  2. Bruker (2004). SMART and SAINT Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  3. Monzani, A., Gamberini, G., Braghiroli, D., Di Bella, M., Raffa, L. & Sandrini, M. (1985). Arch. Pharm.318, 299–304. [DOI] [PubMed]
  4. Sheldrick, G. M. (1996). SADABS University of Göttingen, Germany.
  5. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  6. Tait, A., Parenti, C., Zanoli, P., Veneri, C., Truzzi, C., Brandoli, C., Baraldi, M. & Di Bella, M. (1993). Farmaco, 48, 1463–1473. [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809037271/bx2239sup1.cif

e-65-o2513-sup1.cif (14KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809037271/bx2239Isup2.hkl

e-65-o2513-Isup2.hkl (71.5KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES