Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2009 Oct 17;65(Pt 11):o2765. doi: 10.1107/S1600536809041737

2-Morpholino-4-oxo-4,5-dihydro­thio­phene-3-carbonitrile

JinJiang Zhu a, Kevin K Liu a, Matthew A Marx a, Arnold L Rheingold b, Alex Yanovsky a,*
PMCID: PMC2970977  PMID: 21578359

Abstract

The title compound, C9H10N2O2S, was obtained from the treatment of ethyl 4-cyano-3-hydr­oxy-5-morpholinothio­phene-2-carboxyl­ate with concentrated HCl. The mean plane of the essentially planar dihydro­thio­phene ring is almost orthogonal to the mirror plane of the N-morpholine substituent, making a dihedral angle of 87.2 (2)°.

Related literature

For the structure of a similar compound with the morpholine substituent attached to dihydro­thio­phene ring, see: Moghaddam et al. (2005).graphic file with name e-65-o2765-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • C9H10N2O2S

  • M r = 210.25

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 7.1931 (3) Å

  • b = 17.3275 (8) Å

  • c = 7.2793 (3) Å

  • β = 94.506 (2)°

  • V = 904.48 (7) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Cu Kα radiation

  • μ = 2.98 mm−1

  • T = 100 K

  • 0.41 × 0.20 × 0.08 mm

Data collection

  • Bruker Kappa APEXII diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2001) T min = 0.765, T max = 0.919

  • 7337 measured reflections

  • 1607 independent reflections

  • 1531 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.027

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.026

  • wR(F 2) = 0.068

  • S = 1.08

  • 1607 reflections

  • 128 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.29 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.20 e Å−3

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2007); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2007); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks pflj124, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809041737/dn2498sup1.cif

e-65-o2765-sup1.cif (14.5KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809041737/dn2498Isup2.hkl

e-65-o2765-Isup2.hkl (79.2KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

The title compound was obtained via the treatment of ethyl 4-cyano-3-hydroxy-5-morpholinothiophene-2-carboxylate with concentrated HCl, and its structural formula was confirmed by the present study (Fig. 1).

Dihydrothiophene ring C5/C6/C7/C8/S1 is planar within 0.02 Å. Its least squares plane is almost orthogonal to the mirror plane of the N-morpholine substituent passing through C5, N1 and O1 atoms: the corresponding dihedral angle being 92.8 (2)°. Similar conformation is observed in the related structure with morpholine substituent attached to dihydrothiophene ring (Moghaddam et al., 2005).

Experimental

Into a suspension of ethyl 4-cyano-3-hydroxy-5-morpholinothiophene-2-carboxylate (100 mg, 0.35 mmol) in MeOH (1.2 ml), was added concentrated HCl (0.2 ml) with stirring. The reaction mixture was heated in an oil bath at 60°C for 48 h to form a clear solution. The reaction solution was cooled to room temperature and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The resulting residue was neutralized with 2 N NaOH to pH 4. The precipitate was collected by filtration and rinsed with a solution of water/MeOH. The sample was dried under high vacuum to afford the desired compound as a white solid (52.1 mg, 58% yield). LC—MS (APCI, M+1) 211.2; 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ p.p.m. 3.87 (s, 3 H), 3.84 (dd, J=5.84, 2.07 Hz, 2 H), 3.68 - 3.79 (m, 5 H). The product was recrystallized from EtOAc/hexane/dichloromethane to yield single crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction studies.

Refinement

All H atoms were placed in geometrically calculated positions (C—H 0.99 Å) and included in the refinement in riding motion approximation. The Uiso(H) were set to 1.2Ueq of the carrying atom.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Molecular structure of the title compound, showing 50% probability displacement ellipsoids and atom numbering scheme. H atoms are drawn as circles with arbitrary small radius.

Crystal data

C9H10N2O2S F(000) = 440
Mr = 210.25 Dx = 1.544 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/c Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54178 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc Cell parameters from 2017 reflections
a = 7.1931 (3) Å θ = 8.0–49.4°
b = 17.3275 (8) Å µ = 2.98 mm1
c = 7.2793 (3) Å T = 100 K
β = 94.506 (2)° Blade, colorless
V = 904.48 (7) Å3 0.41 × 0.20 × 0.08 mm
Z = 4

Data collection

Bruker Kappa APEXII diffractometer 1607 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 1531 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphite Rint = 0.027
phi and ω scans θmax = 68.3°, θmin = 5.1°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2001) h = −7→8
Tmin = 0.765, Tmax = 0.919 k = −20→20
7337 measured reflections l = −6→8

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.026 H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.068 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0333P)2 + 0.4P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.08 (Δ/σ)max = 0.005
1607 reflections Δρmax = 0.29 e Å3
128 parameters Δρmin = −0.20 e Å3
0 restraints Extinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods Extinction coefficient: 0.0051 (4)

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
S1 0.41531 (4) 0.190051 (19) 0.14477 (4) 0.01446 (13)
O1 0.93155 (14) −0.01397 (6) 0.25143 (14) 0.0203 (2)
O2 0.60927 (14) 0.39685 (6) 0.22161 (14) 0.0206 (2)
N2 1.03469 (17) 0.30903 (7) 0.41842 (18) 0.0206 (3)
N1 0.72767 (15) 0.12491 (7) 0.28592 (16) 0.0153 (3)
C3 0.7576 (2) −0.00224 (8) 0.1488 (2) 0.0202 (3)
H3A 0.6948 −0.0526 0.1261 0.024*
H3B 0.7789 0.0210 0.0281 0.024*
C4 0.63342 (19) 0.05034 (8) 0.2519 (2) 0.0186 (3)
H4A 0.5133 0.0583 0.1783 0.022*
H4B 0.6072 0.0263 0.3706 0.022*
C5 0.64590 (18) 0.19201 (8) 0.24689 (18) 0.0127 (3)
C6 0.71300 (18) 0.26741 (8) 0.27408 (17) 0.0132 (3)
C7 0.58227 (19) 0.32720 (8) 0.21546 (17) 0.0143 (3)
C9 0.89130 (19) 0.28941 (8) 0.35321 (18) 0.0147 (3)
C8 0.39555 (18) 0.29364 (8) 0.14293 (18) 0.0163 (3)
H8A 0.3622 0.3121 0.0159 0.020*
H8B 0.2968 0.3101 0.2218 0.020*
C2 1.0259 (2) 0.05782 (8) 0.2777 (2) 0.0204 (3)
H2A 1.0490 0.0799 0.1562 0.025*
H2B 1.1482 0.0491 0.3468 0.025*
C1 0.91428 (19) 0.11467 (8) 0.3821 (2) 0.0191 (3)
H1A 0.9019 0.0954 0.5086 0.023*
H1B 0.9799 0.1649 0.3912 0.023*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
S1 0.01039 (19) 0.0182 (2) 0.0144 (2) −0.00046 (11) −0.00152 (13) −0.00068 (11)
O1 0.0208 (5) 0.0133 (5) 0.0264 (5) 0.0025 (4) −0.0004 (4) 0.0007 (4)
O2 0.0198 (5) 0.0151 (5) 0.0270 (5) 0.0026 (4) 0.0030 (4) 0.0025 (4)
N2 0.0156 (6) 0.0184 (6) 0.0273 (7) −0.0014 (5) −0.0015 (5) −0.0033 (5)
N1 0.0123 (5) 0.0139 (6) 0.0191 (6) −0.0009 (4) −0.0025 (5) −0.0008 (4)
C3 0.0230 (8) 0.0154 (7) 0.0216 (7) −0.0006 (5) −0.0021 (6) −0.0011 (5)
C4 0.0162 (7) 0.0139 (7) 0.0253 (7) −0.0039 (5) −0.0008 (6) −0.0010 (5)
C5 0.0111 (6) 0.0169 (7) 0.0102 (6) 0.0006 (5) 0.0018 (5) −0.0011 (5)
C6 0.0118 (6) 0.0149 (7) 0.0129 (6) 0.0007 (5) 0.0014 (5) −0.0003 (5)
C7 0.0142 (6) 0.0174 (7) 0.0118 (6) 0.0011 (5) 0.0040 (5) 0.0008 (5)
C9 0.0167 (7) 0.0116 (6) 0.0161 (6) 0.0015 (5) 0.0036 (5) −0.0006 (5)
C8 0.0135 (7) 0.0193 (7) 0.0159 (7) 0.0031 (5) −0.0001 (5) 0.0011 (5)
C2 0.0158 (7) 0.0160 (7) 0.0293 (8) 0.0006 (5) 0.0008 (6) 0.0049 (6)
C1 0.0147 (7) 0.0145 (7) 0.0267 (7) 0.0004 (5) −0.0071 (6) 0.0005 (5)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

S1—C5 1.7639 (13) C4—H4B 0.9900
S1—C8 1.8004 (14) C5—C6 1.4014 (18)
O1—C3 1.4204 (17) C6—C9 1.4163 (18)
O1—C2 1.4227 (17) C6—C7 1.4410 (18)
O2—C7 1.2227 (17) C7—C8 1.5197 (18)
N2—C9 1.1523 (19) C8—H8A 0.9900
N1—C5 1.3238 (17) C8—H8B 0.9900
N1—C4 1.4710 (17) C2—C1 1.513 (2)
N1—C1 1.4751 (17) C2—H2A 0.9900
C3—C4 1.515 (2) C2—H2B 0.9900
C3—H3A 0.9900 C1—H1A 0.9900
C3—H3B 0.9900 C1—H1B 0.9900
C4—H4A 0.9900
C5—S1—C8 93.15 (6) O2—C7—C6 126.92 (13)
C3—O1—C2 109.68 (10) O2—C7—C8 121.60 (12)
C5—N1—C4 122.97 (11) C6—C7—C8 111.48 (12)
C5—N1—C1 125.44 (11) N2—C9—C6 178.37 (15)
C4—N1—C1 111.37 (11) C7—C8—S1 108.17 (9)
O1—C3—C4 110.79 (11) C7—C8—H8A 110.1
O1—C3—H3A 109.5 S1—C8—H8A 110.1
C4—C3—H3A 109.5 C7—C8—H8B 110.1
O1—C3—H3B 109.5 S1—C8—H8B 110.1
C4—C3—H3B 109.5 H8A—C8—H8B 108.4
H3A—C3—H3B 108.1 O1—C2—C1 111.75 (11)
N1—C4—C3 109.24 (11) O1—C2—H2A 109.3
N1—C4—H4A 109.8 C1—C2—H2A 109.3
C3—C4—H4A 109.8 O1—C2—H2B 109.3
N1—C4—H4B 109.8 C1—C2—H2B 109.3
C3—C4—H4B 109.8 H2A—C2—H2B 107.9
H4A—C4—H4B 108.3 N1—C1—C2 109.81 (11)
N1—C5—C6 130.26 (12) N1—C1—H1A 109.7
N1—C5—S1 117.43 (10) C2—C1—H1A 109.7
C6—C5—S1 112.30 (10) N1—C1—H1B 109.7
C5—C6—C9 126.81 (12) C2—C1—H1B 109.7
C5—C6—C7 114.77 (12) H1A—C1—H1B 108.2
C9—C6—C7 118.42 (12)

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: DN2498).

References

  1. Bruker (2001). SADABS Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  2. Bruker (2007). APEX2 and SAINT Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  3. Moghaddam, F. M., Boeini, H. Z., Bagheri, M., Ruëdi, P. & Linden, A. (2005). Sulfur Chem.26, 245–250.
  4. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks pflj124, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809041737/dn2498sup1.cif

e-65-o2765-sup1.cif (14.5KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809041737/dn2498Isup2.hkl

e-65-o2765-Isup2.hkl (79.2KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES