Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2009 Oct 3;65(Pt 11):o2601. doi: 10.1107/S1600536809039166

1,3-Phenyl­enediammonium dinitrate

Bobby Portis a, Kalpana R Dey a, Musabbir A Saeed a, Douglas R Powell b, Md Alamgir Hossain a,*
PMCID: PMC2971349  NIHMSID: NIHMS173759  PMID: 21578220

Abstract

In the title compound, C6H10N2 2+·2NO3 , the dication lies on a crystallographic twofold rotation axis. The nitrate ions are linked to the dications though N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, forming a three-dimensional network.

Related literature

For general background to polyamines, see: Bianchi et al. (1997); Ilioudis et al. (2002); Hossain (2008). For related structures, see: Anderson et al. (2006; Gawlicka-Chruszcz & Stadnicka (2002); Soumhi & Jouini (1995); Wang et al. (2007).graphic file with name e-65-o2601-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • C6H10N2 2+·2NO3

  • M r = 234.18

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 16.2548 (12) Å

  • b = 9.6212 (8) Å

  • c = 7.1070 (6) Å

  • β = 115.506 (6)°

  • V = 1003.14 (14) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Cu Kα radiation

  • μ = 1.22 mm−1

  • T = 100 K

  • 0.53 × 0.50 × 0.24 mm

Data collection

  • Bruker APEX CCD area-detector diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2007) T min = 0.562, T max = 0.761

  • 5278 measured reflections

  • 942 independent reflections

  • 882 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.036

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.033

  • wR(F 2) = 0.092

  • S = 1.01

  • 942 reflections

  • 84 parameters

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 0.26 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.20 e Å−3

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 1998); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 1998); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809039166/ci2920sup1.cif

e-65-o2601-sup1.cif (12.7KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809039166/ci2920Isup2.hkl

e-65-o2601-Isup2.hkl (46.8KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N5—H5A⋯O1A 0.94 (2) 1.87 (2) 2.7955 (15) 168 (2)
N5—H5B⋯O1Ai 0.92 (2) 1.95 (2) 2.8416 (16) 163 (2)
N5—H5C⋯O3Aii 0.92 (2) 1.96 (2) 2.8626 (16) 167 (2)

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Center for Research Resources (grant No. G12RR013459) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Science Education Partnership Award (SEPA) Program ‘Recovery Act Administrative Supplements Providing Summer Research Research Experiences for Students and Science Educators’ under contract 5R25RR020405–04S1. Funds to purchase the diffractometer used in this study were provided in part by the National Science Foundation (grant No. CHE-0130835).

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

Simple polyammonium ions are known as excellent hydrogen bond donors for a variety of anions in particular for oxoanions, forming supramolecular aggregates with hydrogen bonding networks (Ilioudis et al., 2002). Indeed, a difunctional or trifunctional polyamine is widely used as an essential building block for a macrocyclic based host, and acts as major binding components for a negatively charged anion (Bianchi et al., 1997; Hossain, 2008). In this study, we used a simple 1,3-phenylenediamine to prepare an adduct with nitric acid. We report, herein, the crystal structure of the title compound in which the nitrate anions are connected to the cationic units through hydrogen bonding interactions.

X-ray analysis of the nitrate salt reveals that both amino groups are protonated to form a dication and crystallized with two nitrate anions. In the crystal lattice, each diaction is surrounded by two symmetry related nitrate anions (Fig. 1). Each amino group is engaged in coordinating nitrate anions through N—H ···O bonds ranging from 2.7955 (15) to 2.8626 (16) Å (see Table 1). The crystal structure viewed along the b axis shows that the cations are arranged antiparallel to one another along the c axis in which two adjacent aromatic units are separated at 7.024 Å (Fig. 2). Therefore, there is no π-π stacking involved. The nitrates serve as linkers of the two adjacent aromatic units by hydrogen bonding networks along the b axis.

Experimental

To a solution of 1,3-phenylenediamine (0.1 g) in CH3OH (2 ml) was added a few drop of nitric acid. The white precipitate formed immediately was filtered and washed with diethyl ether. Yield: 80%. M.P. 150.5°C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, D2O, TSP): δ 7.15 (m, J = 4 Hz,1H, ArH), 6.68 (d, J = 8 Hz, J = 2 Hz, 2H, ArH), 6.62 (t, J= 2 Hz, 1H, ArH). Crystals suitable for X-ray crystallography were obtained by recystallization from a methanolic solution of the salt and isolated after seven days keeping the solution under Et2O diffusion in a desiccator.

Refinement

H atoms bonded to carbons were positioned geometrically and refined using a riding model, with C-H = 0.99 Å and Uiso(H) = 1.2 Ueq(C). H atoms bonded to N atoms were located in a difference map and their positional parameters were refined, with Uiso(H) = 1.2 Ueq(N).

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The formula unit of the title compound, showing the atom-numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. Dashed lines indicate hydrogen bonding interactions. Symmetry code: (i) -x, y, 1/2 -z.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Crystal packing of the title compound, viewed along the b axis.

Crystal data

C6H10N22+·2NO3 F(000) = 488
Mr = 234.18 Dx = 1.551 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/c Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54178 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2yc Cell parameters from 3468 reflections
a = 16.2548 (12) Å θ = 5.5–69.5°
b = 9.6212 (8) Å µ = 1.22 mm1
c = 7.1070 (6) Å T = 100 K
β = 115.506 (6)° Block, colorless
V = 1003.14 (14) Å3 0.53 × 0.50 × 0.24 mm
Z = 4

Data collection

Bruker APEX CCD area-detector diffractometer 942 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 882 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphite Rint = 0.036
φ and ω scans θmax = 69.5°, θmin = 5.5°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2007) h = −19→18
Tmin = 0.562, Tmax = 0.761 k = −11→11
5278 measured reflections l = −8→8

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.033 H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.092 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.054P)2 + 1.07P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.00 (Δ/σ)max = 0.001
942 reflections Δρmax = 0.26 e Å3
84 parameters Δρmin = −0.20 e Å3
0 restraints Extinction correction: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods Extinction coefficient: 0.0046 (5)

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
N1A 0.16571 (7) 0.19642 (12) 1.08086 (17) 0.0129 (3)
O1A 0.11343 (7) 0.11334 (11) 0.94063 (14) 0.0171 (3)
O2A 0.17425 (7) 0.31761 (10) 1.03487 (16) 0.0205 (3)
O3A 0.20794 (7) 0.15171 (11) 1.26369 (14) 0.0170 (3)
C1 0.0000 0.16909 (19) 0.2500 0.0119 (4)
H1 0.0000 0.0703 0.2500 0.014*
C2 0.06684 (9) 0.24329 (14) 0.40956 (19) 0.0125 (3)
C3 0.06855 (9) 0.38745 (15) 0.4119 (2) 0.0148 (3)
H3 0.1156 0.4364 0.5218 0.018*
C4 0.0000 0.4588 (2) 0.2500 0.0167 (4)
H4 0.0000 0.5575 0.2500 0.020*
N5 0.13746 (8) 0.16679 (12) 0.58086 (17) 0.0136 (3)
H5A 0.1261 (12) 0.1620 (17) 0.700 (3) 0.016*
H5B 0.1409 (11) 0.079 (2) 0.535 (3) 0.016*
H5C 0.1918 (13) 0.2147 (19) 0.624 (3) 0.016*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
N1A 0.0125 (6) 0.0140 (6) 0.0121 (6) 0.0001 (4) 0.0053 (4) −0.0013 (4)
O1A 0.0187 (5) 0.0179 (5) 0.0115 (5) −0.0058 (4) 0.0034 (4) −0.0038 (4)
O2A 0.0234 (6) 0.0108 (5) 0.0243 (6) −0.0001 (4) 0.0075 (4) 0.0016 (4)
O3A 0.0154 (5) 0.0232 (6) 0.0100 (5) −0.0005 (4) 0.0032 (4) 0.0017 (4)
C1 0.0139 (9) 0.0107 (9) 0.0117 (9) 0.000 0.0062 (7) 0.000
C2 0.0122 (7) 0.0161 (7) 0.0097 (6) 0.0005 (5) 0.0053 (5) 0.0011 (5)
C3 0.0157 (7) 0.0151 (7) 0.0138 (7) −0.0031 (5) 0.0065 (6) −0.0034 (5)
C4 0.0215 (10) 0.0119 (9) 0.0191 (9) 0.000 0.0112 (8) 0.000
N5 0.0133 (6) 0.0149 (6) 0.0098 (6) −0.0005 (4) 0.0022 (5) −0.0005 (4)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

N1A—O2A 1.2348 (16) C3—C4 1.3901 (16)
N1A—O3A 1.2556 (15) C3—H3 0.95
N1A—O1A 1.2747 (15) C4—H4 0.95
C1—C2 1.3838 (16) N5—H5A 0.943 (19)
C1—H1 0.95 N5—H5B 0.92 (2)
C2—C3 1.387 (2) N5—H5C 0.924 (19)
C2—N5 1.4621 (16)
O2A—N1A—O3A 121.59 (11) C4—C3—H3 120.7
O2A—N1A—O1A 119.88 (11) C3i—C4—C3 120.83 (18)
O3A—N1A—O1A 118.53 (11) C3—C4—H4 119.6
C2i—C1—C2 117.89 (17) C2—N5—H5A 112.7 (10)
C2—C1—H1 121.1 C2—N5—H5B 108.4 (11)
C1—C2—C3 122.02 (12) H5A—N5—H5B 109.8 (14)
C1—C2—N5 118.72 (13) C2—N5—H5C 108.7 (11)
C3—C2—N5 119.26 (11) H5A—N5—H5C 104.8 (15)
C2—C3—C4 118.62 (12) H5B—N5—H5C 112.5 (15)
C2—C3—H3 120.7
C2i—C1—C2—C3 −0.49 (9) N5—C2—C3—C4 −178.80 (10)
C2i—C1—C2—N5 179.28 (13) C2—C3—C4—C3i −0.47 (8)
C1—C2—C3—C4 0.97 (17)

Symmetry codes: (i) −x, y, −z+1/2.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
N5—H5A···O1A 0.94 (2) 1.87 (2) 2.7955 (15) 168 (2)
N5—H5B···O1Aii 0.92 (2) 1.95 (2) 2.8416 (16) 163 (2)
N5—H5C···O3Aiii 0.92 (2) 1.96 (2) 2.8626 (16) 167 (2)

Symmetry codes: (ii) x, −y, z−1/2; (iii) −x+1/2, −y+1/2, −z+2.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: CI2920).

References

  1. Anderson, K. M., Goeta, K. M., Hancock, K. S. B. & Steed, J. W. (2006). Chem. Commun. pp. 2138–2140. [DOI] [PubMed]
  2. Bianchi, A., García-España, E. & Bowman-James, K. (1997). Supramolecular Chemistry of Anions New York: Wiley-VCH.
  3. Bruker (1998). SMART and SAINT Bruker AXS, Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  4. Gawlicka-Chruszcz, A. & Stadnicka, K. (2002). Acta Cryst. C58, o416–o420. [DOI] [PubMed]
  5. Hossain, M. A. (2008). Curr. Org. Chem 12, 1231–1256.
  6. Ilioudis, C. A., Georganopoulou, D. G. & Steed, J. W. (2002). CrystEngComm, 4, 26–36.
  7. Sheldrick, G. M. (2007). SADABS University of Göttingen, Germany.
  8. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  9. Soumhi, E. H. & Jouini, T. (1995). Acta Cryst. C51, 1457–1459.
  10. Wang, K.-W., Zhang, H. & Shen, L.-Q. (2007). Acta Cryst. E63, o126–o128.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809039166/ci2920sup1.cif

e-65-o2601-sup1.cif (12.7KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809039166/ci2920Isup2.hkl

e-65-o2601-Isup2.hkl (46.8KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES