Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Clinical Investigation logoLink to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
. 1968 Sep;47(9):2045–2057. doi: 10.1172/JCI105890

Evaluation of the forced oscillation technique for the determination of resistance to breathing

Aron B Fisher 1,2, Arthur B DuBois 1,2, Richard W Hyde 1,2
PMCID: PMC297365  PMID: 5675425

Abstract

Total respiratory resistance (RT) was measured by the application of a sine wave of airflow to the mouth at the resonant frequency of the respiratory system. The mean respiratory resistance of 42 normal subjects, measured at a mean functional residual capacity of 3.3 liters, was 2.3, SD ± 0.5, cm H2O/liter per sec, and the resonant frequency was between 5 and 8 cycle/sec. The airway resistance measured in these same subjects with the body plethysmograph at a mean panting thoracic gas volume of 3.5 liters was 1.3, SD ± 0.3, cm H2O/liter per sec. Total respiratory resistance was found to vary inversely with lung volume (V) measured plethysmographically; prediction formulae for normal subjects based on this relationship are: RT (mean) = 7.1/V, RT (range) = 4.0/V to 11.6/V where V is in liters and RT is in cm H2O/liter per sec. When these criteria were applied to subjects with thoracic disease the following results were obtained: 17 subjects with obstructive lung disease all had elevated total respiratory resistance; 9 subjects with diffuse lung disease without airway obstruction all had normal respiratory resistance; all but 1 of 5 obese subjects and all but 2 of a heterogeneous group of 9 subjects without airway obstruction had normal respiratory resistance. Failure to take lung volume into account resulted in a considerable decrease in the ability to discriminate between obstructive and nonobstructive lung disease on the basis of the forced oscillation test. The resonant frequency of the respiratory system of patients with obesity or nonobstructive lung disease was similar to that obtained in the normal group; accurate evaluation of resonant frequency in subjects with obstructive lung disease was frequently not possible. The combined resistances of lung, thoracic wall and abdominal tissues were found to account for less than 43% of the total respiratory resistance in normal subjects and were only slightly increased by the presence of obesity, restrictive diseases of the thoracic wall, and hyperinflation of the thorax. The forced oscillation method is potentially of value in the study of resistance to breathing of patients who cannot undergo body plethysmography, such as acutely ill, anesthetized, or unconscious subjects. Accurate evaluation of RT requires an independent measure of lung volume as well as careful attention during measurements to the airflow rate, phase of respiration, and the adequacy of cheek compression and laryngeal relaxation.

Full text

PDF
2045

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BEDELL G. N., MARSHALL R., DUBOIS A. B., COMROE J. H. Plethysmographic determination of the volume of gas trapped in the lungs. J Clin Invest. 1956 Jun;35(6):664–670. doi: 10.1172/JCI103323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BRISCOE W. A., DUBOIS A. B. The relationship between airway resistance, airway conductance and lung volume in subjects of different age and body size. J Clin Invest. 1958 Sep;37(9):1279–1285. doi: 10.1172/JCI103715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BRODY A. W., CONNOLLY J. J., Jr, WANDER H. J. Influence of abdominal muscles, mesenteric viscera and liver on respiratory mechanics. J Appl Physiol. 1959 Jan;14(1):121–128. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1959.14.1.121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. BRODY A. W., DUBOIS A. B. Determination of tissue, airway and total resistance to respiration in cats. J Appl Physiol. 1956 Sep;9(2):213–218. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1956.9.2.213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. BRODY A. W., DUBOIS A. B., ENGELBERG J., NISELL O. I. Natural frequency, damping factor and inertance of the chest-lung system in cats. Am J Physiol. 1956 Jul;186(1):142–148. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1956.186.1.142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. BRODY A. W., WANDER H. J., O'HALLORAN P. S., CONNOLLY J. J., Jr, SCHWERTLEY F. W. CORRELATIONS, NORMAL STANDARDS, AND INTERDEPENDENCE IN TESTS OF VENTILATORY STRENGTH AND MECHANICS. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1964 Feb;89:214–235. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1964.89.2.214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brody J. S., Glazier J. B. The effect of position on pulmonary function in chronic obstructive lung disease. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1965 Oct;92(4):579–588. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1965.92.4.579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. COMROE J. H., Jr, BOTELHO S. Y., DUBOIS A. B. Design of a body plethysmograph for studying cardiopulmonary physiology. J Appl Physiol. 1959 May;14(3):439–444. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1959.14.3.439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cass L. J. Measurement of total respiratory and nasal airflow resistance. JAMA. 1967 Feb 6;199(6):396–398. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. DUBOIS A. B., BOTELHO S. Y., COMROE J. H., Jr A new method for measuring airway resistance in man using a body plethysmograph: values in normal subjects and in patients with respiratory disease. J Clin Invest. 1956 Mar;35(3):327–335. doi: 10.1172/JCI103282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. DUBOIS A. B., BRODY A. W., LEWIS D. H., BURGESS B. F., Jr Oscillation mechanics of lungs and chest in man. J Appl Physiol. 1956 May;8(6):587–594. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1956.8.6.587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. EMMANUEL G., BRISCOE W. A., COURNAND A. A method for the determination of the volume of air in the lungs: measurements in chronic pulmonary emphysema. J Clin Invest. 1961 Feb;40:329–337. doi: 10.1172/JCI104260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. FERRIS B. G., Jr, MEAD J., OPIE L. H. PARTITIONING OF RESPIRATORY FLOW RESISTANCE IN MAN. J Appl Physiol. 1964 Jul;19:653–658. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1964.19.4.653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. GOLDMAN H. I., BECKLAKE M. R. Respiratory function tests; normal values at median altitudes and the prediction of normal results. Am Rev Tuberc. 1959 Apr;79(4):457–467. doi: 10.1164/artpd.1959.79.4.457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. KNOTT J. L., MACHAFFIE R. A., LIN T. K., LOOMIS G. W., BRODY A. W. Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis. A case with cardiac catheterization and pulmonary function studies. Ann Intern Med. 1961 Sep;55:481–490. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-55-3-481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Loyd H. M., String S. T., DuBois A. B. Radiographic and plethysmographic determination of total lung capacity. Radiology. 1966 Jan;86(1):7–14. doi: 10.1148/86.1.7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. MEAD J., LINDGREN I., GAENSLER E. A. The mechanical properties of the lungs in emphysema. J Clin Invest. 1955 Jul;34(7 Pt 1):1005–1016. doi: 10.1172/JCI103150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. NEEDHAM C. D., ROGAN M. C., McDONALD I. Normal standards for lung volumes, intrapulmonary gas-mixing, and maximum breathing capacity. Thorax. 1954 Dec;9(4):313–325. doi: 10.1136/thx.9.4.313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Neu H. C., Connolly J. J., Jr, Schwertley F. W., Ladwig H. A., Brody A. W. Obstructive respiratory dysfunction in parkinsonian patients. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1967 Jan;95(1):33–47. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1967.95.1.33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. SHARP J. T., HENRY J. P., SWEANY S. K., MEADOWS W. R., PIETRAS R. J. THE TOTAL WORK OF BREATHING IN NORMAL AND OBESE MEN. J Clin Invest. 1964 Apr;43:728–739. doi: 10.1172/JCI104957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Shephard R. J. Dynamic characteristics of the human airway and the behavior of unstable breathing systems. Aerosp Med. 1966 Oct;37(10):1014–1021. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. TIERNEY D. F., NADEL J. A. Concurrent measurements of functional residual capacity by three methods. J Appl Physiol. 1962 Nov;17:871–873. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1962.17.6.871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Investigation are provided here courtesy of American Society for Clinical Investigation

RESOURCES