Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2010 Nov 4;5(11):e13697. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013697

The Mechanism of Abrupt Transition between Theta and Hyper-Excitable Spiking Activity in Medial Entorhinal Cortex Layer II Stellate Cells

Tilman Kispersky 1, John A White 2, Horacio G Rotstein 3,*
Editor: Clayton T Dickson4
PMCID: PMC2973955  PMID: 21079802

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that stellate cells (SCs) of the medial entorhinal cortex become hyper-excitable in animal models of temporal lobe epilepsy. These studies have also demonstrated the existence of recurrent connections among SCs, reduced levels of recurrent inhibition in epileptic networks as compared to control ones, and comparable levels of recurrent excitation among SCs in both network types. In this work, we investigate the biophysical and dynamic mechanism of generation of the fast time scale corresponding to hyper-excitable firing and the transition between theta and fast firing frequency activity in SCs. We show that recurrently connected minimal networks of SCs exhibit abrupt, threshold-like transition between theta and hyper-excitable firing frequencies as the result of small changes in the maximal synaptic (AMPAergic) conductance. The threshold required for this transition is modulated by synaptic inhibition. Similar abrupt transition between firing frequency regimes can be observed in single, self-coupled SCs, which represent a network of recurrently coupled neurons synchronized in phase, but not in synaptically isolated SCs as the result of changes in the levels of the tonic drive. Using dynamical systems tools (phase-space analysis), we explain the dynamic mechanism underlying the genesis of the fast time scale and the abrupt transition between firing frequency regimes, their dependence on the intrinsic SC's currents and synaptic excitation. This abrupt transition is mechanistically different from others observed in similar networks with different cell types. Most notably, there is no bistability involved. ‘In vitro’ experiments using single SCs self-coupled with dynamic clamp show the abrupt transition between firing frequency regimes, and demonstrate that our theoretical predictions are not an artifact of the model. In addition, these experiments show that high-frequency firing is burst-like with a duration modulated by an M-current.

Introduction

Information flows from the neocortex to the hippocampus through the superficial layers (II and III) of the medial entorhinal cortex (EC) [1], [2]. The spiny stellate cells (SCs) are the most abundant cell type in layer II of the medial EC, and give rise to the perforant path, the main afferent fiber system to the hippocampus [1], [3]. Previous experimental and theoretical work [4][11] has shown that SCs posses the intrinsic and dynamic properties that endow them with the ability to display rhythmic activity in the theta frequency range (4–10 Hz). More specifically, in vitro electrophysiological studies have shown that SCs display rhythmic subthreshold membrane potential oscillations (STOs) in the theta frequency range and, when the membrane is set positive to threshold, SCs fire action potentials at the peak of the STOs, but not necessarily on every STO cycle [4]. These subthreshold oscillations are intrinsic single cell phenomena [12] resulting from the interaction between a persistent sodium (Inline graphic) and a hyperpolarization-activated (Inline graphic) currents [4]. In vivo spiking patterns are similarly rhythmic in the theta range [13], although there is some question about the link between subthreshold oscillations and in vivo firing [14]. Theta frequency rhythmic activity in the medial temporal lobe has been implicated in learning and memory process [15][18] and spatial navigation [19][22].

SCs have been found to be hyper-excitable in animal models of temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) [23][25]. In the hyper-excitable state SCs fire at a frequency much higher than theta. The proposed network mechanisms for hyper-excitability of SCs include, as their main component, a reduced level of the inhibitory inputs onto SCs in diseased animals as compared to control ones [23], [25][31]. Similar results to these observed in epileptic animals were shown to occur in control animals under GABAA receptor blockade with picrotoxin [31]. A recent study [32] found evidence for the existence of (1) recurrent excitatory connections among SCs, (2) similar levels of recurrent excitation in control and epileptic animals, and (3) reduced levels of recurrent inhibition of SCs in epileptic animals as compared to control ones.

A cell's firing frequency can be described in terms of an effective time-scale operating in the subthreshold regime and resulting from current balances occuring there. For SCs in the theta frequency range, Inline graphic activates fast and provides the main drive for the depolarization phase of STOs while Inline graphic (hyperpolarization-activated with slow kinetics) provides a delayed feedback effect that promotes resonance. In an isolated cell, the spikes occurring at the peak of STOs are the result of imbalances among Inline graphic, Inline graphic and the tonic drive (constant applied current) [4], [10], [11], [33]. Each subsequent spike will occur after roughly a theta cycle. Theoretical studies [8] have shown that spiking at theta frequencies persists in recurrently connected SCs for significant levels of synaptic AMPA excitation, and SCs synchronize in phase. We reasoned that, dynamically such a network behaves as a single, self connected SC. Accordingly, a synaptic pulse of AMPA excitation arrives immediately after a spike has occurred. The initial SC's fast depolarization provides a window of opportunity for a new spike to occur (shortly after the previous one) provided the amount of excitatory current is large enough to overcome the combined effect of the theta pacemaking currents before they fully develop (note that EPSPs activate Inline graphic but deactivate Inline graphic). This amount of excitatory current depends on the the maximal synaptic conductance and the synaptic decay time. The interspike interval (ISI) of two such consecutive spikes would be much shorter than a theta cycle and would constitute an effective fast time-scale for the autaptically connected SCs and hence for recurrently connected network of SCs. We hypothesized that under biophysically plausible conditions recurrently connected networks of SCs are able to fire in these two well separated frequency regimes depending on the levels of recurrent synaptic excitation but not at frequencies in between. The fast frequency regime corresponds to hyper-excitable firing. In the context of this paper we use term hyper-excitability as the ability of the SC to fire in this fast frequency regime.

In this paper we investigate this hypothesis and the underlying biophysical and dynamic mechanism that leads to hyper-excitable firing in SCs, including the role played by synaptic inhibition (opposing the effects of synaptic excitation) and the mechanism of termination of fast frequency spiking leading to hyper-excitable bursts similar to the ones observed experimentally [31]. In our investigation we combine modeling, simulations, dynamical systems tools and dynamic clamp experiments.

Results

We use a biophysical (conductance-based) model for SCs that has previously been used to investigate several aspects of SC dynamics including the mechanism of generation of rhythmic activity at theta frequencies (subthreshold oscillations and spikes) in single SCs and recurrently connected networks including SCs and interneurons [8], [10], [11]. This model is based on measurements from layer II SCs [4], [33][35], and it includes a persistent sodium (Inline graphic), a two-component (fast and slow) hyperpolarization-activated (Inline graphic or h-) current, and a slow potassium (Inline graphic or M-) current. The model is described in the Methods section. We first show that minimal model networks including SCs and interneurons (ICs) exhibit a transition between the tw firing frequency regimes (theta and hyper-excitable) as the result of reduced levels of inhibition onto SCs, thus capturing a main feature of the results by Kumar et al. [31]. We then show that this transition also occurs for recurrently connected SCs in the absence of inhibition and that it is abrupt (threshold-like); i.e., the constant theta firing frequency maintained for significant levels of recurrent excitation [8] breaks at a threshold level and a sudden increase in firing frequency occurs. We observe similar transitions in single SCs self-connected with an autapse. However, this transition does not occur in isolated SCs by increasing tonic (constant) excitation. Next, we use phase-space analysis to provide a geometric/dynamic explanation of these results. More specifically, we explain how Inline graphic and Inline graphic interact with AMPA synaptic excitation to produce the two modes of firing frequency operation for sub- and super-threshold levels of recurrent excitation. By using this approach we demonstrate that the fast time scale, just like the theta time scale, is “built in” the SC model but is occluded in isolated cells and uncovered by phasic excitation. Differently from other mechanisms for similar phenomena [36], we have not observed bistability between the corresponding firing frequency regimes. Experiments using dynamic clamp show that real SCs exhibit abrupt transition between firing frequency regimes; i.e., our theoretical findings are not an artifact of the model. Finally, the combination of this experimental approach and simulations using single cells uncovers a new role for the M-current in modulating the duration of bursts of hyper-excitable activity.

Minimal networks capture hyper-excitable behavior

Hyper-excitability in recurrently connected stellate cells with reduced inhibition

We used a minimal network model consisting of two stellate cells (SCs) and one interneuron (IC) (Figure 1-A) to capture the transition between firing frequency regimes as the result of reduced levels of inhibition onto SCs. The two SCs are connected via excitatory AMPAergic synapses. Each of these cells receives GABAergic inhibition (GABAA) from the IC. In Figures 1, 2 and 3, the maximal synaptic conductances between the two stellate cells are equal (Inline graphic = Inline graphic) and represented by Inline graphic. The inhibition to both SCs is also equal (Inline graphic) and is represented by Inline graphic.

Figure 1. Abrupt transition from the theta to the hyper-excitable regime in a SI minimal network.

Figure 1

A: Diagram of the minimal SI network. Stellate cells (S) excite each other (AMPA) and receive inhibition (GABAA) from an interneuron (I). The maximal synaptic conductances Inline graphic and Inline graphic are represented by Inline graphic and Inline graphic respectively. B and C: show the transition from the theta to the persistent hyper-excitable regime as the result of a small decrease in inhibition. In the theta regime SCs are synchronized in phase while in the hyper-excitable regime SCs are synchronized slightly out of phase. The right panel in C is a magnification of the left one. The parameters used are Inline graphic, and Inline graphic.

Figure 2. The role of synaptic excitation and inhibition in the abrupt transition from the theta to the hyper-excitable regimes in two recurrently connected SCs.

Figure 2

A–D: Abrupt transition from the theta to the hyper-excitable regime in two recurrently connected SCs as a result of a small increase in the amount of excitation. A: In the absence of recurrent excitation the SCs fire out of phase. B and C: Recurrent excitation synchronizes the SCs in phase but the firing frequency remains almost unchanged in the theta regime. D: A small increase in the maximal synaptic conductance causes the abrupt transition to the hyper-excitable regime. The parameters used are Inline graphic. E and F: A small increase in inhibition to the two recurrently connected SCs reverses the firing frequency from the hyper-excitable to the theta regime. The parameters used are Inline graphic.

Figure 3. The abrupt transition from the theta to the hyper-excitable regime is the result of phasic but not tonic excitation.

Figure 3

A: Firing frequency of a single isolated SC as a function of the applied DC current Inline graphic. The transition from low to high frequencies is smooth. B: Firing frequency of a single SC self-excited via an autapse as a funciton of the autapse maximal synaptic conductance Inline graphic (Inline graphic). The transition from low to high frequencies is abrupt. C: Effects of persistent sodium and h-currents on hyperexcitability in a self-connected single SC. Top-left panel: A decrease in the h-current maximal conductance Inline graphic facilitates hyperexcitability for a fixed applied DC current Inline graphic. Appropriate values of Inline graphic were chosen in order to obtain close values of the SC's firing frequency for for Inline graphic (isolated cell). Top-right panel: A decrease in the h-current maximal conductance Inline graphic facilitates hyperexcitability for a fixed maximal persistent sodium conductance Inline graphic. Appropriate values of Inline graphic were chosen in order to obtain close values of the SC's firing frequency for for Inline graphic (isolated cell). Bottom-left panel: Changes in the h-current maximal conductance Inline graphic have little effect on hyperexcitability for fixed values of Inline graphic and Inline graphic. Bottom-right panel: An increase in the amount of persistent sodium facilitates hyperexcitabilit for fixed values of Inline graphic and Inline graphic. In all cases, simulations were performed using the (7D) “full” SC model.

Figure 1 shows representative examples of the transition from normal (theta) to hyper-excitable spiking activity in SCs resulting from a decrease in synaptic inhibition. In these figures, the natural frequency of each SC (the firing frequency of the cell in the absence of any excitatory and inhibitory input) was set at Inline graphic3 Hz with an underlying subthreshold oscillation frequency approximately equal to 9 Hz. This produces a regular pattern of three subthreshold oscillations per spike (Figure 2-A). In the absence of any synaptic input the two SCs fire with a relative phase that depends on the initial conditions. The natural frequency of the IC was set to Inline graphic25 Hz [37]. During normal activity (Figure 1-B), the firing frequency of the synchronized in phase coupled SCs (Inline graphic4 Hz) is slightly higher than the uncoupled ones (Inline graphic3 Hz). The higher firing frequency is due to excitation combined with repeated inhibitory pulses that result in activation of the h-current [10], [11], [38] producing a net depolarizing effect. Figures 1-B and -C differ only in the value of Inline graphic, which is lower in Figure 1-C and represents the decreased inhibition seen in epileptic rats [31]. For larger values of Inline graphic (Figure 1-B), SCs fire in the theta regime at Inline graphic4 Hz and synchronize in phase as occurs for recurrently connected networks of SCs in the absence of inhibition [8]. When Inline graphic is reduced (Figure 1-C), SCs fire at Inline graphic60 Hz and synchronize slightly out of phase (Figure 1-C, top-right panel).

A small increase in the SC recurrent synaptic conductance causes an abrupt increase in the SC's firing frequency in the absence of inhibition

In order to understand the role of recurrent excitation in the abrupt transition between firing frequency regimes, we modified the minimal model network considering only two synaptically connected SCs with no inhibition (Inline graphic = 0). Figure 2-A shows voltage traces of two uncoupled SCs (Inline graphic = 0). In this case, the phase relationship of the cells depends only on their initial conditions. When coupling is added (Inline graphic Inline graphic0), Figures 2-B and -C, SCs synchronize in phase in the theta frequency regime as previously shown in [8]. Notably, in Figures 2-B and -C, which differ significantly in the strength of Inline graphic coupling, SCs fire at nearly the same frequency showing that firing in the theta frequency regime is robust to changes in the levels of recurrent excitation. However, when Inline graphic is further increased by a small amount an abrupt transition in the firing frequency occurs (Figure 2-D). This large change in the SC's firing frequency for a small change in the maximal conductance Inline graphic has the characteristics of a threshold-like phenomenon occurring for a value, or a very narrow range of values, of Inline graphic in between Inline graphic and Inline graphic (Figures 2-C and -D).

A small increase in the inhibitory input to fast firing SCs abruptly reverses their firing frequency to the theta regime

Here we show that the inhibition acts as a switch between firing frequency regimes. That is, inhibition uncovers the fast time scale created by recurrent excitation in the minimal network model but is not necessarily involved in its generation. To this end, we reintroduce a small amount of inhibition to the network of two coupled SCs (Inline graphic Inline graphic0). We started with the network firing in the hyper-excitable regime (parameters like those in Figure 2-D). Figures 2-E and -F show that a small increase in inhibition can abruptly cause a transition back to the theta state. The value of Inline graphic at which the transition to hyper-excitable firing occurs is dependent on the chosen value of Inline graphic and, in the representative example shown, lies between the two values used in Figures 2-E and -F. No bistability between firing frequency regimes was observed in this inhibition-containing network just as no such bistability was observed in the network containing recurrent excitation. We discuss this point further in the next sections.

The abrupt changes in the SC firing frequency are the result of phasic but not tonic excitation

Here we show that the abrupt transitions between the theta and hyper-excitable firing frequency regimes observed in recurrently connected networks of SCs do not occur in single, isolated SCs. To simplify our study, we followed other authors [36], [39], [40] and studied a single SC synaptically connected to itself with an “autapse”. We justify this approximation by noting that model SCs synchronize in phase in the theta regime and very close to in phase in the hyper-excitable regime This approximation lends itself well to later experimental and analytical investigation.

We compared the effects of increasing tonic (constant) excitation (Inline graphic) in the isolated cell (Inline graphic) with increasing phasic excitation, via increasing the maximal synaptic conductance Inline graphic, in an autaptically coupled model SC for constant values of the tonic drive. Figure 3-A shows a graph of frequency as a function of Inline graphic for Inline graphic = 0 (only tonic excitation). In this regime the SC can reach high spike rates with no abrupt changes in the firing frequency. Note that although the SC can fire at frequencies corresponding to the hyper-excitable regime, the change in the amount of Inline graphic needed for the transition from the theta regime seems biophysically implausible.

Figure 3-B shows a graph of frequency as a function of Inline graphic for a constant value of the tonic drive Inline graphic (only changes in phasic excitation). The constant value of Inline graphic chosen is equal to the one used in the previous sections. Figure 3-B shows an abrupt jump in the firing frequency occurring in a very small range of values of Inline graphic. Simulations for values of Inline graphic in this range shows spiking burts with fast intra-burst spiking frequency (corresponding to the hyper-excitable regime). They are reminiscent of the bursts observed in the presence of an M-current (discussed later, see also Figure S7-b). For the remainder of this paper we will approximate this narrow range by a threshold value. As a consequence of the approximation (single, self-connected SCs representing a recurrently connected SC population), the threshold values for hyper-excitability are higher than the ones found for the two recurrently connected SCs. Qualitatively, however, these simulation results show that increasing phasic excitation (by increasing maximal autapse strength, Inline graphic) past a threshold value causes a rapid transition to the hyper-excitable regime (Figure 3-B). Voltage traces illustrating this transition are presented in Figure S7-a.

Further simulations show that there is no histeresis, and hence no bistability, between firing frequency regimes as the result of increasing Inline graphic. (See also Figure S2 and Supporting Text S1) Lack of bistability often occurs in nonlinear systems showing abrupt transitions between disparate dynamic regimes. A typical example is the abrupt transition in the amplitude of limit cycles created in a super-critical Hopf bifurcation due to the canard phenomenon in two-dimensional fast-slow systems such as the FitzHugh-Nagumo model [41], [42]. Note that in the model we use (see Methods) the transition from subthreshold oscillations to spikes in isolated cells also occurs via a canard mechanism [10], [11].

The dynamic mechanism we describe here is different from previous work on recurrently connected excitatory networks. AMPA recurrent excitation has been shown to lead to high frequency firing in networks of integrate-and-fire (I-F) neurons [36]. In these models there is bistability between a rest state and a high frequency spiking state, and the minimal firing rate increases as Inline graphic (our Inline graphic) increases. In addition, in I-F models the frequency of isolated cells increases with increasing amounts of both phasic and tonic excitation. In contrast, we show that SCs recurrently connected via AMPA synaptic excitation display spiking activity in two frequency regimes (theta and hyper-excitable) with no bistability between them. In addition, the SC's firing frequency remains almost constant until the levels of AMPA excitation reach the threshold for the abrupt transition; i.e., the SC's firing frequency in the theta regime is very robust below the threshold for hyper-excitability. Moreover, the model we use, unlike I-F models, contain biophysical information about SCs that allow for the investigation of the effect of the cell's intrinsic currents on hyper-excitabiliy. Finally, in the recurrently connected networks considered in [36], AMPA receptor mediated synaptic excitation produced firing frequencies much higher than the ones corresponding to our hyper-excitable regime. Lower firing frequencies required either NMDA receptor mediated synaptic excitation or synaptic depression mechanisms [36]. Note that due to its slow decay time NMDA currents are almost constant for the time scales corrsponding to the hyper-excitable regime and thus would produce no qualitative change in the behaviors described in this paper. Hyper-excitable firing due to recurrent synaptic excitatory connections and controlled by synaptic inhibition has been previously shown to occur in other areas of the hippocampal formation such as hippocampal region CA3 [43][46]. However, the set of intrinsic currents present in CA3 pyramidal cells is different from these controlling the dynamics of SCs in the subthreshold regime. Synaptic excitation with slow decay times has been shown to significantly reduce the firing frequency in networks of Hodgkin-Huxley (HH) neurons [40] leading to low firing frequency patterns consisting of spikes interspersed with subhtreshold oscillations at much higher frequencies. Although this scenario has some similarities with the one displayed by SCs in the low firing frequency regime, the two are qualitatively different. First, in both cases the corresponding slow time scales are generated by a three-dimensional canard mechanism [10], [11], [40], [47]. However, for SCs the slow time scale is generated by the intrinsic currents (mostly Inline graphic and Inline graphic) with no participation of synaptic excitation while synaptic excitation is necessary for the networks of HH neurons considered in [40]. In addition, as we showed above, the SC's firing frequency is maintained for significant levels of recurrent excitation before the abrupt transition to high-frequency firing occurs while for the HH neurons in [40] firing firing frequency decreases with stronger synaptic coupling. Finally, for SCs subthreshold oscillations occur at theta frequencies and result from the interaction between Inline graphic and Inline graphic with no participation of the spiking currents (transient sodium, Inline graphic, and delayed-rectifier potassium, Inline graphic) while for networks of HH neurons subthreshold oscillations have a frequency much higher than theta and result from the interaction among synaptic excitation, Inline graphic and Inline graphic.

The effect of the SC's intrinsic currents on abrupt transition between firing regimes

The abrupt transition between firing frequency regimes persists upon changes in the SC's intrinsic currents Inline graphic, Inline graphic and the tonic drive Inline graphic. The effect of these changes are reflected mostly in the threshold values for Inline graphic. In most cases we compared among parameter sets where the levels of Inline graphic, Inline graphic and Inline graphic are balanced so that the resulting baseline frequency in the theta regime is almost unchanged (see Figure S3). Our results are presented in Figure 3-C. (See also Figure S2 and Supporting Text S1). Figure 3-C (top panels) show that for a given baseline frequency (Inline graphic Hz) in the theta regime, the threshold for the abrupt transition increases with Inline graphic. The top-left panel corresponds to a constant value of Inline graphic and pairs of balanced values of Inline graphic and Inline graphic while the top-right panel corresponds to a constant value of Inline graphic and pairs of balanced values of Inline graphic and Inline graphic. In Figure 3-C (bottom-left panel) both Inline graphic and Inline graphic are constant, and consequently the baseline theta frequency increases with Inline graphic (see also Figure S3) but the threshold for the abrupt transition remains almost constant. Figure 3-C (bottom-right panel) corresponds to constant values of Inline graphic and Inline graphic. The baseline theta frequency increases with Inline graphic but the threshold for the abrupt transition decreases with increasing values of Inline graphic. The effect of changes in Inline graphic will be considered later in the paper.

The dynamic mechanism of abrupt transition between firing frequency regimes due to phasic excitation

Phase-space analysis is a useful geometric tool for building a qualitative understanding of the evolution of dynamical systems. Here we use dynamical systems tools to provide a geometric/dynamic explanation of the mechanism underlying the abrupt transition between firing frequency regimes in a single model SC, self-connected via AMPA excitation. In particular, we show that the two time scales (theta and fast) are built into the isolated SC, explain their dependence on the model parameters, in particular Inline graphic, Inline graphic and Inline graphic, and show how these currents interact with synaptic excitation.

We extend the nonlinear artificially spiking (NAS) SC model derived in [10] to include synaptic currents (see Methods for the description of this model for an isolated SC). NAS models include integrate- and resonate-and-fire neurons. The NAS-SC model consist of a set of three equations describing the dynamics of the the voltage Inline graphic and the two Inline graphic gating variables, (fast Inline graphic and slow Inline graphic) in the subthreshold voltage regime, a voltage threshold Inline graphic indicating the occurrence of a spike and a reset value for the dynamic variables after a spike has occurred. This model captures the main aspects of the dynamics of the “full” (7D) SC model in the subthreshold regime [10] (see Methods): the generation of subthreshold oscillations and the onset of spikes. The model also includes Inline graphic, slaved to Inline graphic due to the fast dynamics of its associated gating variable Inline graphic, but it does not include the spiking currents Inline graphic and Inline graphic, which were found to be negligible in the subthreshold regime [10], nor Inline graphic which, as suggested by other authors [48] and confirmed by our experiments (described later in this paper), is not active at subthreshold voltage levels and does not alter the low frequency firing behavior.

In order to account for the effect of synaptic excitation, we extend the reduced NAS-SC model Eqs. (14)–(16) described in Methods for a single SC to include a synaptic current term (autapse) Inline graphic in the voltage equation, and a fourth equation describing the evolution of the synaptic variable Inline graphic. The resulting equations are:

graphic file with name pone.0013697.e131.jpg (1)
graphic file with name pone.0013697.e132.jpg (2)
graphic file with name pone.0013697.e133.jpg (3)
graphic file with name pone.0013697.e134.jpg (4)

The (reduced) NAS-SC model captures the abrupt changes in the firing frequency due to phasic self-excitation

In Figure 4-A we show a graph of firing frequency vs. Inline graphic for representative values of Inline graphic, Inline graphic and Inline graphic. For these parameter values there is a jump in firing frequency for Inline graphic in a range of values in the interval Inline graphic. Figure 4-B shows the voltage traces for Inline graphic (top panels) and Inline graphic (bottom panels), on each side of, and close to the transition values. Time Inline graphic corresponds to the occurrence of a spike and hence the initiation of the EPSP. The total period for the unperturbed SC is Inline graphic ms. The interspike-interval decreases from Inline graphic ms (Figure 4-B, top-left panel) to Inline graphic ms (Figure 4-B, bottom-left panel). Comparison between the top and bottom panels shows that in both cases, the voltage first depolarizes fast at the beginning of the interspike interval and then it continues to depolarize fast for Inline graphic = 0.21, eventually spiking, while for Inline graphic = 0.2 the trajectory “turns around” and hyperpolarizes, displaying a “bump” and continues to evolve on a much slower time scale. Note that the bump period is much smaller than the subthreshold oscillation period, and of the same order of magnitude as the fast spike. Qualitatively similar results are obtained for other combinations of parameters indicating this behavior is robust (data not shown). Note that the transition values of Inline graphic are lower than the ones corresponding to the full model. This is due to the NAS-SC model approximation described above. However, consistent with the full SC model, transition values are the same as those observed for two recurrently coupled NAS-SC cells initially in phase (data not shown).

Figure 4. The NAS-SC model self-connected with an autpase captures the abrupt transition between the theta and hyper-excitable regimes as the result of small changes in the maximal synaptic conductance Inline graphic.

Figure 4

A: Spiking frequency vs. Inline graphic for representative values of Inline graphic and Inline graphic. The spiking frequency is measured in number of spikes per second. The transition point corresponds to Inline graphic. B: Voltage traces for one representative values of Inline graphic on each side of (and close to) the transition point. The value of the persistent sodium maximal conductance is Inline graphic. The interspike intervals are Inline graphic ms (top-left) and Inline graphic ms (bottom-left). The right panels are magnifications of the left ones.

The dynamics of isolated SCs: Phase-space analysis, nonlinearities and time-scale separation

The NAS-SC model for the isolated SC (Inline graphic) is three-dimensional and is described by Eqs. (1)–(3). (The equation for Inline graphic is decoupled from system (8)–(16).) Figure 5-A shows the trace of one firing period generated by the NAS-SC model for a biophysically plausible set of parameters (and Inline graphic = 0). The initial conditions were set at Inline graphic and Inline graphic which approximate the reset values of the variables after a spike has occurred. Importantly, when capturing the SC's dynamics after a spike has occured, not all initial conditions in the subthreshold regime are possible but only these reset values (see Methods and [10]). In Figure 5-A, the voltage first increases fast, then evolves on a slower time scale displaying a few subthreshold oscillations (Figure 5-A, bottom panel), and finally increases fast marking the initiation of a spike. (Spikes are the result of the activation of Inline graphic, which is not described by the NAS-SC model and belongs to the spiking regime as explained in Methods.)

Figure 5. Phase-space diagram for the NAS-SC model in the theta regime (slow time scale).

Figure 5

Trajectories begin evolving from reset values Inline graphic (Inline graphic measured in mV). A: Voltage trace corresponding to the trajectory shown in B and C:. The bottom panel is a magnification of the top one and shows subthreshold oscillations. B: Two-dimensional projection of the phase-space diagram shown in C. The two curves in red are contained in the V-nullsurface. The bottom panel is a magnification of the top one. C: For different views of the Inline graphic phase-space diagram showing only the V-nullsurface and the trajectory. The values of the parameters are Inline graphic.

Figures 5-B and -C show the phase-space corresponding to Figure 5-A. Trajectories join the points Inline graphic corresponding to different values of Inline graphic. As Inline graphic increases, the tip of the trajectory moves describing the evolution of the dynamical system (1)–(3). The set of points resulting from setting the right hand sides of Eqs. (1)–(3) equal to zero define surfaces, called nullsurfaces, on which there is no motion in the direction of the corresponding variable. Nullsurfaces, and their shapes, play an important role in the description of a phase-space. The Inline graphic-nullsurface for system (1)–(3) with Inline graphic, is given by

graphic file with name pone.0013697.e174.jpg (5)

The Inline graphic- and Inline graphic- nullsurfaces are given by Inline graphic and Inline graphic respectively. The speed of the trajectory is not captured by the phase-space. Additional information has to be taken either from the voltage traces or from the parameter values. The SC model in the subthreshold regime is a fast-slow system. Inline graphic is the fast variable and both Inline graphic and Inline graphic are the slow variables; i.e., both Inline graphic and Inline graphic evolve on a much slower time scale than Inline graphic. This time-scale separation is crucial for the phenomenon we are explaining here. In Methods we show how these time scales are uncovered by bringing the system (1)–(3) to the dimensionless form.

Trajectories evolve on a combination of both time scales: fast along horizontal directions and slow on small neighborhoods of the V-nullsurface. Figure 5-C shows the V-nullsurface Inline graphic and the trajectory corresponding to Figure 5-A. This trajectory moves fast from its initial point Inline graphic towards the left branch of the V-nullsurface (Figure 5-C, top-left panel) (fast voltage increases) and then slow in a vicinity of the Inline graphic-nullsurface (the so called slow manifold, along which Inline graphic increases slow) towards the curve of knees (Figure 5-C, top-right panel). Once trajectories reach the curve of knees, they oscillate (Figure 5, bottom panels) [10], and finally move fast in the direction of increasing values of V. This unbounded motion in the horizontal direction signifies that the trajectory escapes the subthreshold regime and moves into the spiking regime where the dynamics are governed by a different set of currents. Due to the nature of the system's dynamics (vector field), once a trajectory starts moving along this fast horizontal direction it cannot stop unless externally forced. Thus, once a trajectory is on the right side of the V-nullsurface it will spike. We emphaize that spiking is indicated, but not described, by Inline graphic.

Figure 5-B shows a compact (two-dimensional) description of the phase-space where the two-dimensional Inline graphic- and Inline graphic-nullsurfaces are projected onto the Inline graphic-Inline graphic plane. The top panel shows the curves Inline graphic and Inline graphic (for some Inline graphic Inline graphic0), which are the result of the intersection of Inline graphic with constant planes Inline graphic and Inline graphic respectively. Both curves are contained in the nullsurface Inline graphic given by (5). Note that as Inline graphic increases, the V-nullsurface decreases; i.e., the curve of knees joining the maxima of the curves Inline graphic is a decreasing function of Inline graphic. In the following sections we will use this compact description.

From our previous discussion, the evolution of the trajectory describing the state of the system at different times within an interspike-interval (ISI) can be qualitatively understood by looking at the nullsurfaces, in particular the Inline graphic-nullsurface, and the time-scale separation between the participating variables which separates the phase-space into regions of fast and slow motion. The Inline graphic-nullsurface and the relative time scales are the main components of the system's dynamic structure. They convey information about Inline graphic, Inline graphic and Inline graphic, and relations among them through Eq. (5), defining the Inline graphic-nullsurface, the non-dimensionalization results in the Methods section, and the Figure S1. Due to the presence of two time scales, trajectories spend most of the interspike interval (spiking period) in a vicinity of the Inline graphic-nullsurface. Consequently, the SC's interspike interval (spiking period) can be approximated by the time the trajectory spends in a neighborhood of the V-nullsurface. Thus, the nullsurface represents the balance among Inline graphic, Inline graphic and Inline graphic necessary for the cell to fire at a specific frequency. An increase in Inline graphic favoring spiking at a higher frequency is reflected in a “lower” Inline graphic-nullsurface. For instance, the maximum of the V-nullsurface corresponding to Inline graphic = −2.35 (Figure S4-b) is lower than that corresponding to Inline graphic = −2.5 (Figure 5-B) reflecting the fact that, as the applied current increases the time the trajectory spends in the subthreshold regime decreases and thus the firing rate increases (Figure S4-a). Changes in other parameter values such as Inline graphic and Inline graphic have analogous effects on both nullsurfaces and firing frequency. Figure S3 summarizes some of these effects.

By looking at the effect that changes in the biophysical parameter values have on the Inline graphic-nullsurface and time-scale separation one can predict how these changes will affect the cell's dynanics. This approach has been useful in the investigation of the mechanism of generation of subthreshold and spikes in the SC model, and in particular about the role of Inline graphic, Inline graphic and Inline graphic in the generation of the theta time scale through equation (5) and the results in [10], [11]. We refer the reader to these papers for further details.

Gradual (non-abrupt) increase in firing frequency due to tonic excitation

In Figure 6, and in more detail in Figures S5 and S6, we present the voltage traces (left panels) and phase-space diagrams (right panels) for various values of Inline graphic increasing from top to bottom. As Inline graphic increases, the nullsurfaces move down by an amount almost proportional to the value of Inline graphic, and the region of the slow manifold available for the trajectory to move along decreases. As a consequence, the time the trajectory spends on the slow manifold decreases almost linearly with the value of Inline graphic and the cell's firing frequency increases nearly linearly with the value of Inline graphic. The cell's highest firing frequency corresponds to the trajectory moving along the fast (horizontal) direction without being “captured” by the slow-manifold (Figure 6, bottom panel). Since the displacement of the V-nullsurface as a consequence of increasing values of Inline graphic is gradual, so is the transition from the lower (theta) to higher (hyper-excitable) firing frequencies. Thus, there are no abrupt changes in firing frequency due to increases in tonic excitation.

Figure 6. Voltage traces and two-dimensional phase-space representations for the NAS-SC model for increasing values of Inline graphic .

Figure 6

Each row shows the voltage trace (left) for a particular value of Inline graphic and the corresponding phase space diagram (right). As the value of Inline graphic gradually increases (top row lowest value of Inline graphic, bottom row highest value of Inline graphic, the V-nullsurface gradually moves down causing the firing frequency to increase. As the model is not self-connected in this case, increasing Inline graphic causes a gradual increase in firing rate proportional to the applied current. Increasing values of Inline graphic cause a progressive decrease in the influence of the slow manifold on the trajectory and thus no rapid transitions in firing rate are observed.

For each choice of parameters, in particular for each choice of the tonic drive Inline graphic, the NAS-SC model has a unique interspike-interval (a unique spiking period) which is determined by the parameter values and the initial condition Inline graphic which, again, reflects the fact that Inline graphic resets after a spike has occured. Consider parameter values corresponding to Figure 5 for which the SC fires in the slow (theta) frequency regime. Hypothetically, for the SC to fire also in the fast frequency regime for this same set of parameter values, the initial conditions should be located above the level of knee of the Inline graphic-nullsurface in phase-space; i.e., initially, Inline graphic should be higher than the maximum of the Inline graphic-nullsurface. If this happened, then the trajectory would evolve along a fast, horizontal direction thus reaching the end of the subthreshold voltage range in a short time interval corresponding to fast spiking. (Note that this condition is equivalent to requiring Inline graphic to be initially large enough to disrupt the current balance corresponding to slow spiking.) However, as we mentioned earlier, the initial conditions in the subthreshold regime are not arbitrary but correspond to the reset values after a spike has occurred and are “dictated” by the “full” (7D) model [10]. Trajectories starting these initial conditions are “captured” by the Inline graphic-nullsurface and forced to evolve (at a slower pace) in its vicinity until reaching the knee.

Abrupt increase in firing frequency due to phasic excitation

Due to the addition of the synaptic variable Inline graphic, system (1)–(4) is four-dimensional. Geometrically, the generalized nullsurfaces (the set of points that make the right hand side of equation (1) equal to zero) are three-dimensional objects:

graphic file with name pone.0013697.e247.jpg (6)

The corresponding phase-space diagram can be visualized by extending the previous approach used for the isolated NAS-SC model to include values of Inline graphic Inline graphic. Figure 7 corresponds to the traces shown in Figure 4-B (top panel) where the SC fires in the theta regime. Figure 8 corresponds to the traces shown in Figure 4-B (bottom panel) in which the SC fires in the fast (hyper-excitable) regime. The initial conditions in both cases (Figures 7 and 8) correspond to the reset values of the trajectory after a spike has occurred. Note that the synaptic variable Inline graphic is parameterized by time; thus the 3D generalized V-nullsurface can be seen as a two-dimensional Inline graphic-nullsurface moving as time evolves. More precisely, in each panel we plot the V-nullsurface corresponding to a representative value of Inline graphic(t). After a spike has occurred, the synaptic variable Inline graphic first increases and then decreases with the time scales corresponding to the rise (fast) and decay (slow) times of AMPAergic excitation. We use the parameters in [8]. As a consequence, the V-nullsurface (6) first moves down (fast) (Figure 7-A) until Inline graphic has reached its maximum. When Inline graphic starts decreasing, the V-nullsurface moves back up on a slower time scale (Figure 7-B) corresponding to the AMPA decay time. Given a specific firing frequency in the theta (slow) frequency regime. For each value of Inline graphic, and hence for each value of Inline graphic, the distance between the peaks of the unperturbed and perturbed Inline graphic-nullsurfaces measures the instantaneous magnitude of the current balance disruption due to synaptic excitation. The current balance is recovered when the Inline graphic-nullsurface returns to its original position (or close to it).

Figure 7. Dynamic two-dimensional phase-space representation of one firing phase for the self-connected NAS-SC model in the theta regime.

Figure 7

Parameter values are Inline graphic and Inline graphic and fixed for all diagrams. The value of Inline graphic is below the threshold for hyper-excitable firing and thus a theta frequency ISI is observed. Each panel shows the evolution of the phase space for time points through one firing phase. Time increases from A to H. As the trajectory evolves it is captured by the slow-manifold (vicinity of the V-nullsurface) and is forced to move around it on a slow time scale thus causing subthreshold oscillations.

Figure 8. Dynamic two-dimensional phase-space representation of one firing phase for the self-connected NAS-SC model in the hyper-excitable regime.

Figure 8

Parameter values are as in Figure 7 except that the value of Inline graphic is above the threshold for hyper-excitable firing and thus a very short ISI is observed. Each panel shows the evolution of the phase space for time points through one firing phase. Time increases from A to D. The trajectory evolves along the fast time scale and it manages to escape the subthreshold regime without being captured by the slow manifold (vicinity of the V-nullsurface).

If the trajectory moving along the horizontal direction is slow compared with the speed at which the V-nullsurface moves up, then it may be caught inside it (Figure 7-C). If this occurs, then the trajectory is forced to reverse its direction and move towards the left (Figure 7-D). This change in the trajectory's Inline graphic direction of motion gives rise to the fast frequency “bump” observed in Figure 5-B (top panel). After crossing the left branch of the V-nullsurface the trajectory moves along the slow manifold (small neighborhood of the V-nullsurface) (Figure 7-E). When it reaches the knee (Figure 7-F) it oscillates eventually escaping the subthreshold regime firing an action potential (Figures 7-G and -H). As before, since all other processes occur along fast directions, the cell's spiking period is determined by the time the trajectory spends in the vicinity of the slow manifold (vicinity of the V-nullsurface). Thus, the spiking period of the coupled (Inline graphic = 0.2) and uncoupled (Inline graphic = 0) cases do not differ by much. In this case, the SC's current balance recovered fast enough to prevent the new spike from occurring right after the previous one.

This geometric picture changes for Inline graphic = 0.21 (Figure 8). For this value of Inline graphic, the V-nullsurface does not move upwards fast enough to be able to capture the trajectory inside it (Figure 8-C). As a consequence, the trajectory is able to keep moving along the fast (almost horizontal) direction and escapes the subthreshold regime, firing an action potential, without being influenced by the slow manifold. The SC's spiking period and firing frequency are thus determined by the time it takes the trajectory to traverse the subthreshold regime (fast time scale) leading to hyper-excitability. In this case, the SC's current balance did not recover fast enough to prevent a spike to occur right after the previous one. In the absence of any change in the model parameters these dynamics repeat and lead to persistent firing in the fast frequency regime.

Taken together, these results and the results of the previous sections explain the genesis of the two time-scales present in SCs (theta, slow and hyper-excitable, fast) and the abrupt transition between them as the result of interactions between the SC's intrinsic currents and recurrent phasic (AMPA) excitation. Additionally, our results show the role that AMPA synaptic kinetics play in this process.

Dynamic clamp experiments confirm theoretical findings and suggest a novel role for the M-current in stellate cells

In vitro SCs undergo abrupt transitions in firing rate due to small increases in self-excitation

To confirm the predictions of our theoretical results and to show that they are not a artifact of the model, we performed an experimental investigation of the role of recurrent excitation on hyper-excitable firing in in vitro mEC SCs. To make experimental investigation tractable and to allow the comparison between our theoretical and experimental results we proceeded as above and approximated a network of recurrently coupled SCs with a single self-coupled SC. In all experiments SCs were synaptically isolated from surrounding cells with AMPA and GABAA blockers (see Methods). We used dynamic clamp to mimic autapses onto patch-clamped SCs and asked whether small increases in the strength of the autapse could produce hyper-excitable firing as observed in our simulation results (Figures 1 to 3). We also asked whether in vitro self-coupled SCs undergo abrupt, threshold-like transitions to the hyper-excitable regime. To start, SCs were depolarized with constant current to achieve a spike rate of about 2 Hz on average (4–6 Hz spike clusters separated by longer inter-cluster intervals). Over the course of each experiment, autapse maximal conductance Inline graphic was increased in a ramp-like manner from 0–6 nS. In all cells tested using this protocol, we observed a transition from regular spiking to high frequency, burst spiking (representative example, Figure 9-C, first panel control, second and third panels with autapse).

Figure 9. Sudden transitions from regular spiking to burst firing in EC stellate cells.

Figure 9

A: Instantaneous frequency (the frequency corresponding to a single ISI, see Methods) jumps rapidly in autapse ramp experiments. In this representative example, autapse strength (Inline graphic) was ramped up gradually exposing a threshold (dotted vertical line) above which firing frequency jumps to the hyper-excitable, bursting regime. Prior to ramp onset (data not shown) and low levels of autapse strength stellate cells fire at baseline, DC current dependent frequencies. At a critical level of autapse strength (0.8 nS in this example) a small further increase in autapse conductance causes a sudden transition to the high frequency firing regime consistent with our modeling work. B: Instantaneous frequency jumps rapidly with increasing tonic current in autaptically coupled SCs. A control stellate cell (not coupled with an autapse) is given DC current steps increasing in magnitude. Firing rate increases gradually and continuously as a function of input current (right axis). When the same cell is coupled with an autapse of constant strength firing frequency undergoes a rapid transition to the hyper-excitable regime when identical current steps are presented (left axis, note difference in scale). C: Linopirdine increases autapse-induced burst duration. Representative example of an autapse experiment. After a period of baseline firing was observed (first panel), the autpase was turned on inducing hyper-excitable, burst firing (second panel). A magnified view of a single burst is seen in the last panel. D: After 10 Inline graphicM linopirdine was washed on the same experiment was done on the same cell using the same autapse magnitude. Baseline, uncoupled firing remained qualitatively unchanged (first panel). However, once the autapse is turned on and burst firing is induced, significantly more spikes per burst are observed. The second panel shows a single burst magnified in the last panel to show individual spikes. E: M-current blockade with linopirdine significantly increases number of spikes per burst. For all recorded autapse experiments we observed no significant difference between burst ISIs with and without linopirdine application (left bar graph, n = 6). However, burst duration measured as the number of spikes per burst increased significantly (Inline graphic) with linopirdine application (right bar graph, n = 6). Error bars are SEM. Linopirdine alters the shape of the spike after hyperpolarization on a fast time scale.

To confirm that the transition to the high frequency firing regime is a threshold-like phenomenon (defined here as disproportionately large change in firing frequency given a small parameter change) in autaptically coupled SCs, we measured the instantaneous frequency (see Methods) of spike trains produced by autapse conductance ramps. Using these protocols, before autapse strength reached it's threshold level, theta frequency (4–6 Hz) activity was observed. Consistent with modeling results (Figures 2-B, -C and 3-B), changes in the strength of self-coupling below the threshold for hyper-excitability did not appear to change the firing frequency to any significant degree.

When autapse strength reached approximately 0.8 nS (Figure 9-A, dashed line) instantaneous firing frequency jumped from the theta range to approximately 60 Hz. Further increases in the autapse strength parameter (Inline graphic) continued to increase the firing rate but no further abrupt transitions in frequency were observed. Thus we conclude that, consistent with modeling results, in vitro SCs can undergo abrupt transitions in firing rate due to small increases in self-excitation.

The abrupt changes in firing frequency in in vitro SCs are the result of phasic but not tonic excitation

Next, we investigated whether in vitro SCs could abruptly transition to the high frequency firing regime when given DC current (control) or whether phasic, synaptic current (from an autapse) was necessary. In these experiments, current steps were used instead of current ramps. We found no difference in the qualitative outcome of these two protocols. We applied current steps of increasing magnitude both with an autapse (phasic current) and without an autapse present (tonic current only, control). Figure 9-B shows a representative example in which we compare current steps given to an autaptically coupled cell (black line) to the same cell under control conditions when there was no autapse (gray line). In the control case, the frequency of spikes increased linearly with increasing current and reached a maximal frequency of around 20 Hz when the current steps had a magnitude of around 300 pA (Figure 9-B, gray line, right axis). In all experimental data presented, frequency was computed as the intra-cluster or intra-burst frequency. Clusters and bursts were distinguished as groups of spikes separated by ISIsInline graphic ms. When an autapse was present (constant value of Inline graphic = 10 nS in this example), triggering single spikes due to tonic injected current would immediately trigger an entire train of spikes as the recurrent coupling provided additional positive feedback resulting in continued spiking until adaptation mechanisms activated. At around 100 pA injected DC current, instantaneous frequency (computed from intra-burst intervals only) rapidly jumped to about 150 Hz and remained there for the duration of the experiment. Firing frequency did not change significantly for higher values of applied current. This same behavior was seen in all cells tested (n = 6). We conclude that abrupt, threshold-like transitions in firing rate can occur in recurrently coupled SCs with small increases in phasic current but not isolated (uncoupled) unstellate cells. These experimental results are in good qualitative agreement with our modeling results (Figure 3).

Blockade of the M-current in autapse-coupled, in vitro SCs increases the number of spikes per burst

Both modeling and experimental results show the existence of a hyper-excitable firing frequency regime. However, there is a difference between the predicted high frequency firing patterns and the experimentally observed ones. The former are persistent (see Figure 1) while the latter are burst-like. This behavior indicates the presence of a slow, adapting mechanism possibly produced by an M-current [49]. The M-current is a slowly activating, depolarization activated and hyperpolarizing current mediated by Kv7 type potassium channels. It is known that blockade of the M-current can cause bursting behavior in hippocampal neurons [50] and some non-stellate EC cells [48] in response to square current pulses. On the other hand, blockade of the M-current has been shown to have no effect on the subthreshold oscillatory activity in SCs oscillatory activity [48].

We build on these studies by investigating the M-current's effect on SC bursting in response to realistic synaptic inputs generated with dynamic clamp. Figures 9-C and -D are representative traces from the same cell being given an identical autapse. Under control conditions (Figure 9-C) SCs fire in proportion to their applied current, Inline graphic2 Hz in this example (left panel). As with our previous data, all frequency measurements represent intra-cluster or intra-burst frequency. When an autapse is added, burst firing due to self-excitation is induced (Figure 9-C, panel 2). The dotted box in this panel is magnified in the last panel. We note that the representative burst shown has three spikes and then terminates. We then applied 10Inline graphicM of the Kv7 channel blocker linopirdine to the same cell and performed the same recording (Figure 9-D). Baseline firing, shown in the first panel, appeared unaltered which is consistent with previous work [48]. Introduction of an autapse, shown in panel 2, induced burst firing as in the control case. However, a magnified burst (Figure 9-D, panel 3) shows that the burst duration increased to around 10 spikes. Thus we conclude that the M-current in SCs is activated at voltages above threshold, during high frequency firing, and modulates burst duration in response to recurrent excitation.

Burst duration but not burst interspike interval (ISI) is modulated by the M-current in in vitro SCs

To quantify the changes to burst properties we performed the same experiment shown in Figure 9-C, -D for six cells and observed burst durations with and without M-current blockade. To automatically identify the gaps between bursts we searched the data for inter-spike intervals longer than Inline graphic ms. Averaging over all cells showed that burst duration increased significantly (Figure 9-E, right bar plot, pInline graphic0.01, n = 6) with average burst duration changing from about 3.5 spikes per burst in control (gray bar) to about 7.5 spikes per burst with M-current block (black bar). Interestingly, the intra-burst frequency (the frequency of spikes within a burst) didn't change significantly, as seen in the left bar plot of Figure 9-E and remained at an ISI of about 7 ms regardless of M-current blockade (n = 6). Thus we conclude that in hyper-excitable stellate cells in vitro burst duration but not burst ISI is modulated by the M-current. In all cells tested, firing was not persistent even with M-current block as seen in some versions of the model. See our discussion below.

Addition of a M-current to the minimal network model produces burst-like behavior in the hyper-excitable frequency regime

Consistent with our own and previous experimental findings [48], the parameters corresponding to Inline graphic were set so that its blockade did not affect subthreshold oscillatory patterns; i.e., Inline graphic was set to activate for voltage values slightly above the subthreshold regime in contrast to previous studies [8] and to layer V pyramidal cell models [51]. Figures 10-A and -B show the transition from the theta regime (Figure 10-A) to the hyper-excitable regime (Figure 10-B) for the minimal network investigated above (Figure 1-A) when the strength of inhibition (Inline graphic) is lowered (Figure 10-B) to mimic the drop in SC inhibitory inputs seen in epileptic animal models. For the larger value of Inline graphic (Figure 10-A), SCs fire in phase at Inline graphic4 Hz (theta regime). For the lower value of Inline graphic (Figure 10-B), SCs fire bursts of spikes with an interspike interval of 17 ms (Inline graphic60 Hz) and slightly out of phase with one another. The length of the hyper-excitable burst is modulated by the amount of Inline graphic (data not shown).

Figure 10. Abrupt transition from the theta to the bursting hyper-excitable regime in a SI minimal network in a stellate cell model including a M-current.

Figure 10

The parameters used are Inline graphic and Inline graphic.

A qualitatively similar transition from the theta to the burst-like hyper-excitable regime is observed in the self-coupled SC model as the maximal synaptic conductance Inline graphic increases above its threshold level (see Figure S7-B). The high-frequency regime is burst-like but the intra-burst interspike-interval remains almost unchanged. Figure S7-B shows the abrupt transition between firing frequency regimes for Inline graphic. The Inline graphic threshold for the transition is not affected by the presence of Inline graphic. Near this threshold values the number intra-burst spikes is low and increases with Inline graphic (Figure S7-B top-left to bottom-right panels). The interspike-interval within a burst is almost constant. For a fixed value of Inline graphic the number of spikes per burst decreases with increasing values of Inline graphic (not shown). In contrast to experimental findings, complete blockade of Inline graphic produces persistent firing (Figures 2 and S7-A) indicating that SCs contain additional mechanisms not considered in our model that terminate bursts. We discuss these mechanisms further below.

Discussion

Previous work has established that stellate cells (SCs) from layer II of the medial entorhinal cortex in vitro display rhythmic patterns of voltage activity in the theta frequency regime (4–10 Hz) [4], [12]. These patterns, consisting of subthreshold oscillations and spikes, have been shown to be an intrinsic cell phenomenon [12] resulting from the interaction between the h- (Inline graphic) and persistent sodium (Inline graphic) currents [4]. In vivo spiking patterns have been shown to be similarly rhythmic in the theta range [13], although there is some question about the link between subthreshold oscillations and in vivo firing [14]. Modeling work has contributed to the understanding of the mechanism of generation of theta rhythmic subthreshold oscillations and spiking patterns [4], [9][11], [33] in single SCs, and in small networks including SCs and interneurons [8], [10], [11], [37].

Recent studies report that SCs are hyper-excitable in epileptic-like, pilocarpine-treated rats [31], [32] where reduced levels of recurrent inhibition and similar levels of recurrent excitation have been observed in diseased animals as compared to control ones. Similar results to those observed in epileptic animals were shown to occur in control animals under GABAA receptor blockade [31]. Furthermore, hyper-excitability in SCs does not appear to be dependent on changes in the intrinsic properties of SCs [23], [32], [52]. These findings raised the question of what biophysical and dynamic mechanisms are responsible for both the generation of the fast time scale corresponding to hyper-excitable firing and the transition between the theta and hyper-excitable firing frequency regimes.

In this paper we have addressed these questions using biophysical (conductance-based) modeling, simulations, dynamical systems tools and dynamic clamp experiments. We have shown that model SCs have the intrinsic dynamic properties that endow them with the ability to fire in the fast, hyper-excitable regime in addition to the theta one. In other words, the fast time scale corresponding to hyper-excitable firing is “built in” the SC as it is the slow time scale corresponding to theta rhythmic activity (generated by the interaction between Inline graphic and Inline graphic). The latter is uncovered with the solely presence of appropriate levels of tonic (constant) drive while the former requires phasic excitation to be uncovered and is “hidden” in control cases. The transition between these two modes of operation is abrupt mostly due to the fast-slow nature of the dynamical system governing the dynamics of the SC model in the subthreshold regime, and it does not require changes in the intrinsic properties of SCs.

In a single, self-connected SC, AMPA recurrent excitation arrives at the cell immediately after a spike has occurred and causes an imbalance between Inline graphic (depolarization activated) and Inline graphic (depolarization deactivated) that favors spiking. Spiking occurs within a short interval after the previous spike provided the amount of recurrent AMPA excitation is large enough for this current imbalance to be maintained for the necessary amount of time. This requires the maximal synaptic conductance and the decay time of excitation to be large enough so the SC's recovery from excitation is slow enough. For combinations of these two parameters such that the amount of AMPA current is lower, the current balance between Inline graphic and Inline graphic that opposes fast spiking is recovered fast enough, before a new spike occurs, and the SC does not fire again until after roughly a theta cycle.

To show that our findings are not an artifact of the model we performed complementary in vitro experiments where real SCs where synaptically self-excited using dynamic clamp. We first showed that in vitro stellate cells do indeed exhibit and abrupt transition to fast spiking. Next, we showed a difference in response to depolarizing current steps when a stellate cell was autaptically coupled and when it was not. In the presence of the autapse, the cells jumped abruptly to very high frequency firing, while in its absence the cells proportionally increased their firing rates with the level of injected current.

Firing patterns displayed in SCs were burst-like meaning that periods of high frequency firing triggered by positive feedback were interspersed by periods of quiescence. They resemble those observed in the in vitro experiments in [32] in response to brief current pulses in both pilocarpine-treated animals and control animals under GABAA receptor blockade. Next, we showed that burst-like firing in the in vitro preparation is modulated by the depolarization activated M-current. Addition of an M-current to our model SC resulted in similar burst-firing behavior. Supplemental data (see Supporting Text S1) shows that washing on linopirdine, an M-current blocker, enhances the depolarizing after potential (DAP) in autaptically coupled SCs, an event on the same timescale as monosynaptic inputs (Figure S8). We hypothesize that the amplification of the DAP causes increased receptivity to fast timescale spike generating synaptic inputs lengthening. It has been previously reported that a similar transient spike probability change controls patterned spiking in a stellate cell model with stochastically gating channels [9]. An outstanding difference between our modeling and experimental results is that experimental blockade of the M-current did not produce persistent firing as in our model. This indicates that other currents, not considered in this study, are also involved in the termination of the high frequency bursts. Further research will be required to identify these currents. Possible mechanisms include (i) other potassium currents mediated by Kv2.1 subclass channels which are also (like Kv7) non-inactivating and have slow kinetics, and are not blocked by linopiridine, (ii) fast firing would causing calcium build up and eventually leading to the activation and opening of calcium dependent potassium channels, (iii) sodium depletion after many spikes which could eventually lead to the termination of spiking. In addition, we cannot rule out the possibility that a single-compartment model is too simple to account for the whole phenomenon. However, as our results emphasize, the mechanism of burst termination is independent of the mechanism of transition from “normal” to hyper-excitable firing which is the main focus of this work.

It is well established that the SC model gives highly irregular firing (including clustering) in the theta regime when appropriate levels of noise are added [8], [35], [53]. (See also [33] for a mechanistic description in a similar model). We illustrate irregular firing in the SC model in the theta regime in Figure S9. Adding realistic levels of noise also generate irregular firing in the hyper-excitable regime. In the presence of the M-current, the firing frequency distribution is bimodal (see Figures S10 and S11) with one cluster of firing frequencies in the theta regime and another cluster in the hyper-excitable regime.

In this paper, we did not include the effects of inhibition or the M-current on the phase-space analysis. Previous work [48] by other authors and our experiments have shown that the M-current has a negligible effect on the generation of subthreshold oscillations in the theta frequency regime. Thus, we assumed the M-current is not active in the subthreshold regime. Understanding the M-current's effect on burst duration requires analysis of a separate regime (intermediate between the spiking and subthreshold ones). In principle, Inline graphic opposses the effects of synaptic excitation. A building-up mechanism for Inline graphic as the result of succesive pulses of synaptic excitation is a plausible candidate that could explain the fact that Inline graphic modulates the length of the bursts while the intra-burst frequency remains almost unchanged.

The results for single, self-connected SCs have implications for networks of recurrently connected SCs. However, the mechanism is not straightforward. Unlike single, self-connected cells, in large networks each cell contributes a low amount of AMPA excitation and there is no reason to believe that most inputs coming from other cells arrive within the window opportunity for fast spiking referred to above. In these networks, SCs first need to fire close enough, an ability demonstrated theoretically and experimentally (in vitro) in [8], [54]. For each SC, the transition to fast spiking occurs once the amount of recurrent excitation received right after a spike has occurred reaches a “critical mass”. All SCs in the network are expected to be recruited to fast spiking after a few theta cycles. Our results on networks of two SCs transitioning to fast spiking makes the generation of out-of-phase clusters at theta frequencies very implausible. We hypothesize that the anatomically realistic recurrent coupling, seen in epileptic animal models [32], promotes firing on the fast timescale.

Our results for recurrently connected networks of SCs receiving synaptic inhibition from interneurons show that additional transitions between firing frequency regimes occur depending on the level of inhibition onto SCs. Inhibition acts as an external switch: it is not necessary for the generation of the hyper-excitable firing regime. Instead, inhibition serves to modulate the cell's firing frequency regime. The fact that synaptic inhibition above some threshold value helps maintain the current balance necessary for firing at theta frequencies is not surprising since synaptic inhibition acts by opposing the effects of synaptic excitation. However, synaptic inhibition promotes firing as the result of its interaction with the h-current [38]. Whether this switching mechanism is at work in larger networks of recurrently connected SCs remains an open question. Synaptic inhibition has a dual effect on SCs. It both promots and disrupt synchronization in phase [10]. In the latter case, it would be preventing recruitment of SCs into fast spiking. Our results explaining neural excitability due to the interaction between intrinsic and network properties complement previous studies [36], [43][46].

Reduction of inhibition and recurrent connectivity between SCs has been observed in epileptic tissue [31] in vitro. The present work provides insights into the implications of this type of network arrangement for the generation of hyper-excitable firing. While the hyper-excitable firing patterns shown in this study do not represent the full range of firing behaviors seen in a true epileptic seizure our results explain in great mechanistic detail how physiologically realistic network topology can lead to hyper-excitable firing. Our simulations demonstrate that the rapid, threshold like transition to the high frequency firing regime does not require changes in the intrinsic properties of the SC, and is modulated by network inhibition, recurrent excitation and intrinsic biophysical mechanisms. Our experiments (see Supporting Text S1 and Figure S8) show the timing of rapid synaptic feedback is similar to that of SC DAPs which are amplified by M-current block implying a role for the M-current in preventing high frequency neural discharges. This finding suggests a possible method of action for retigabine, an M-current enhancer currently under investigation for therapeutic use for its anti-convulsant properties [55]. Our results suggest that a drug such as retigabine would decrease burst duration by making fast time scale spike generation more difficult. Further research is warranted to investigate the effect of retigabine on the SC DAP and high frequency spiking behavior. The present study provides evidence that stellate cells naturally contain two timescales for spike output. The slow timescale is associated with theta frequency spiking while the fast timescale depends on low levels of inhibition and recurrent excitation and produces hyper-excitable firing as observed in epileptic animals.

Materials and Methods

Modeling: Biophysical models for stellate cells, interneurons and synaptic connections

We use single compartment biophysical (conductance-based) models for both stellate cells (SCs) and interneurons (inhibitory cells or ICs) and consider synaptically coupled networks of these cells. For SCs we use the model introduced in [8], which is based on measurements from layer II SCs of the medial entorhinal cortex (MEC) [4], [33][35]. It has the following currents: transient sodium (Inline graphic), delayed rectifier potassium (Inline graphic), leak (Inline graphic), persistent sodium (Inline graphic), a two-component (fast and slow) hyperpolarization-activated (Inline graphic or h-) current, and a slow potassium (Inline graphic or M-) current. The current-balance equation for single SCs is

graphic file with name pone.0013697.e318.jpg (7)

where Inline graphic is the membrane potential (mV), Inline graphic is the membrane capacitance (Inline graphicF/cmInline graphic), Inline graphic is the applied bias (DC) current (Inline graphicA/cmInline graphic), Inline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic, and Inline graphic. For interneurons (inhibitory cells or ICs) we use the biophysical model introduced in [56]. The current-balance equation for single ICs is

graphic file with name pone.0013697.e332.jpg (8)

where Inline graphic is the membrane potential (mV), Inline graphic is the membrane capacitance (Inline graphicF/cmInline graphic), Inline graphic is the applied bias (DC) current (Inline graphicA/cmInline graphic), Inline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic.

For both cell types Inline graphic Inline graphic and Inline graphic Inline graphic are the maximal conductances (mS/cmInline graphic) and reversal potentials (mV) respectively. The units of time are msec. All the gating variables Inline graphic Inline graphic obey a first order differential equation of the following form:

graphic file with name pone.0013697.e350.jpg (9)

where the activation/inactivation curves and voltage-dependent time scales are given respectively by

graphic file with name pone.0013697.e351.jpg (10)

For the gating variables corresponding to the I-cell (Inline graphic and Inline graphic) the right hand side of eq. (9) is multiplied by a parameter Inline graphic = 5 [56]. The definitions of the functions in eq. (10) for all the gating variables are given below. Graphs of Inline graphic and Inline graphic for the gating variables Inline graphic are presented in Figure S4. For the remaining gating variables, the graphs of Inline graphic and Inline graphic are standard. We use the following parameter values [8], [56]: Inline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic and Inline graphic. In our simulation we keep all parameters fixed except for Inline graphic and the maximal synaptic conductances that we describe below.

For networks we add synaptic connectivity terms of the form

graphic file with name pone.0013697.e365.jpg (11)

to the current balance equations (7) and (8), where X and Z represent the presynaptic and postsynaptic cell respectively with Inline graphic or Inline graphic (mV) according to whether the presynaptic (X) cell is excitatory or inhibitory respectively. The parameters Inline graphic are the maximal synaptic conductances (mS/cmInline graphic). The excitatory and inhibitory reversal potentials are Inline graphic and Inline graphic respectively. The synaptic variables Inline graphic obey the following kinetic equations

graphic file with name pone.0013697.e373.jpg (12)

where

graphic file with name pone.0013697.e374.jpg (13)

and Inline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic and Inline graphic.

Following [35] we introduce channel white noise in the persistent sodium current (Inline graphic) in some of our simulations. More specifically, we add a stochastic term Inline graphic to the dynamic equation for the gating variable Inline graphic. This term is delta correlated with zero mean; i.e., Inline graphic. A similar stochastic formulation has been used to generate subthreshold oscillations (and spikes) in SCs in an otherwise silent SC [10].

The functions Inline graphic and Inline graphic used in the definitions of Inline graphic and Inline graphic or, in some cases, the latter functions are given by

graphic file with name pone.0013697.e389.jpg
graphic file with name pone.0013697.e390.jpg

Note that Inline graphic and Inline graphic.

Simulations were performed using XPP [57] (using parameters: meth = cvode, toler = 1e-5, dt = 0.02) and the modified Euler method [58] coded in C. Graphs were generated with MATLAB (The Mathworks, Natick, MA).

The reduced nonlinear artificially spiking stellate cell (NAS-SC) model

In previous work [10], [11] we studied the mechanism of generation of subthreshold oscillations and the onset of spikes in the SC model (7) (in the absence of Inline graphic). Using dimensionality reduction methods we uncovered a three-dimensional model that captures the dynamics of the SC in the subthreshold regime [10] where subthreshold oscillations are generated and the onset of spikes occur, and provides a good approximation to the “full” SC model in that regime. This reduced 3D model describes the evolution of the membrane potential V and the two h-current gating variables Inline graphic and Inline graphic (fast and slow respectively). Notably, Inline graphic and Inline graphic were found to have a negligible effect on subthreshold dynamics and thus, were omitted from the reduced model [10]. The persistent sodium gating variable Inline graphic evolves much faster than the remaining gating variables and the adiabatic approximation Inline graphic can be made. The resulting equations are

graphic file with name pone.0013697.e400.jpg (14)
graphic file with name pone.0013697.e401.jpg (15)
graphic file with name pone.0013697.e402.jpg (16)

where Inline graphic. Equations (14)–(16) describe the dynamics of the SC in subthreshold regime, including both the generation of subthreshold oscillations and the onset of spikes [10], [11], but they do not describe the spike dynamics which belong in a different regime (where Inline graphic and Inline graphic are the main active currents).

If spiking dynamics are not of interest but only the occurrence of spikes, the dynamics of a SC can be approximately described by Eqs. (14)–(16) supplemented with a zero width “artificial spike” (occurring on a short time scale and reaching a peak of about 60mV) and an appropriate threshold (Inline graphic) and reset (Inline graphic) values. This reduced model was termed the Nonlinear Artificially Spiking SC (NAS-SC) model [10]. It is a class of model that includes the generalized integrate-and-fire and resonate-and-fire models [59], [60]. As we describe later, in our NAS model the onset of a spike occurs when the voltage begins to evolve on a fast time scale as a consequence of the cell's dynamics, and without bounds, in the subthreshold regime. This indicates that the voltage is “escaping” the subthreshold regime and entering the spiking one. We choose Inline graphic such that it lies close to the end of the subthreshold regime. Once the trajectory reaches the threshold value the voltage is reset to its initial, subthreshold value. Note that in contrast to other models, crossing Inline graphic is not part of the mechanism of spike generation and only indicates spike occurrence [10]. The onset of spikes, however, is accurately described by Eqs. (14)–(16). The reset values Inline graphic and Inline graphic can be derived from the seven-dimensional SC model [10], [11]. The reset value Inline graphic mV is an estimate from our numerical simulations. We take Inline graphic as the initial conditions in the subthreshold regime, and we reset the trajectory to these values after each spike has occurred.

In the full SC model there is a brief intermediate regime in between the spiking and the subthreshold regimes [10]. This intermediate regime corresponds to the recovery of the voltage after a spike or AHP. It is different from the subthreshold regime in that Inline graphic is not negligible and its corresponding gating variable n evolves on a time scale faster than both rf and rs. In this regime, both Inline graphic and Inline graphic evolve slowly (and for a short amount of time) from their reset values Inline graphic and Inline graphic to slightly higher ones. In the NAS-SC model approximation we are neglecting both the intermediate and spiking regimes, and we are setting the initial conditions at Inline graphic. The patterns obtained using the NAS-SC and the full SC models are qualitatively similar. However, quantitative comparable results can be obtained by adjusting some parameters such as Inline graphic or the maximal conductances.

Dimensionless formulation

Here we bring system (14–16) to a dimensionless form in order to uncover the different time scales in which the system operates. We first choose appropriate voltage and time reference scales, Inline graphic mV and Inline graphic respectively, and define

graphic file with name pone.0013697.e423.jpg (17)

Note that the spiking cell's voltage range is bounded by the spiking currents reversal potentials Inline graphic mV and Inline graphic mV; so the dimensionless voltage Inline graphic. A relevant voltage range for the subthreshold regime, in terms of the dimensionless variable Inline graphic, is Inline graphic [10], [11]. We define

graphic file with name pone.0013697.e429.jpg (18)

and we choose Inline graphic (see Figure S4-B). We also choose a reference maximal conductance Inline graphic, which is at the top of the range of physiologically plausible values of Inline graphic we use in our simulations. We define the following dimensionless variables, parameters and functions

graphic file with name pone.0013697.e433.jpg (19)
graphic file with name pone.0013697.e434.jpg (20)
graphic file with name pone.0013697.e435.jpg (21)
graphic file with name pone.0013697.e436.jpg (22)
graphic file with name pone.0013697.e437.jpg (23)

Substituting eqs. (17–23) into eqs. (14–16) and deleting the “bar” sign yields

graphic file with name pone.0013697.e438.jpg (24)
graphic file with name pone.0013697.e439.jpg (25)
graphic file with name pone.0013697.e440.jpg (26)

System (24)–(26) is a fast-slow system with Inline graphic evolving on the fast time scale and both Inline graphic and Inline graphic evolving on a slow scale. These two variables evolve on a similar slow time-scale, as it becomes apparent by comparing the values of Inline graphic and Inline graphic (Inline graphic). The dimensionless voltage threshold and reset values are: Inline graphic and Inline graphic.

System (24)–(26) describes the slow dynamics. The fast dynamics is described by the following system obtained by a further rescaling Inline graphic:

graphic file with name pone.0013697.e450.jpg (27)
graphic file with name pone.0013697.e451.jpg (28)
graphic file with name pone.0013697.e452.jpg (29)

Experimental

Brain slice and electrophysiology

All protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Use and Care Committees at Boston University (approval #07-014) and University of Utah (approval #07-09009). Experimental protocols were the same at both locations. Brain slices were prepared using established techniques [54]. Briefly, young, Long-Evans rats (postnatal days 18–28) were anesthetized using isoflurane and decapitated. The brain was removed rapidly and placed in a beaker of ice cold, oxygenated artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF) containing (in mM): NaCl 124, KCl 5, KHInline graphic, POInline graphic 1.2, CaClInline graphic 2.4, MgSOInline graphic 2.6, NaHCOInline graphic 26, D-glucose 25. The pH was maintained at 7.4 by saturation with 95% O2–5% CO2. The brain was dissected down to a block of tissue containing the region of interest. A Vibratome (TPI) was used to cut slices, 350–450Inline graphicm thick in the horizontal plane. Slices were incubated at 32Inline graphicC for at least 30 min and 30 min at room temperature before use.

Entorhinal cells were identified under differential interference contrast (DIC) optics based on morphology and location, then patched with 4–6 MInline graphic glass pipettes filled with internal solution that contained (in mM): 120 K-Gluconate, 10 Inline graphic, 10 HEPES, 4 Mg-ATP, 0.3 Tris-GTP, 10 NaInline graphic-Phosphocreatine, 20 U/ml Creatine Kinase. Pipettes were connected to the headstage of an amplifier (MultiClamp 700B) set in “bridge” mode to obtain current clamp recordings. Input resistance, resting potential, and capacitance compensation settings were continually monitored. Stellate cells in the medial entorhinal cortex were identified using established criteria [61] such as the presence of the hyperpolarization activated cation current Ih, spike clustering and peri-threshold oscillations.

Dynamic clamp

A real-time dynamic clamp system [62] was used to mimic the recurrent connections between a population of stellate cells. “Autapses” were modeled with a double exponential function with rise time constant of 0.3 ms and fall time constant of 5.6 ms [63]. The sum of the synaptic delay and conduction delay was modeled to be 3 ms. Synaptic currents obeyed the equation Inline graphic where Inline graphic is the maximal synaptic conductance, Inline graphic is the synaptic variable, Inline graphic is the post-synaptic voltage supplied by the dynamic clamp and Inline graphic is the synaptic reversal potential which was set to 0 mV. After cells were patch clamped, their membrane voltage was supplied to the dynamic clamp which detected, in real time, the occurrence of spikes in the voltage trace. After a spike was detected and the synaptic delay had passed the dynamic clamp computed the time varying, voltage dependent output current necessary to mimic the desired synaptic waveform.

Analysis

Dynamic clamp data was analyzed with MATLAB (The Mathworks, Natick, MA). Dynamic clamp protocols were written to enable constant value autapses and autapse ramps. Frequency vs. Inline graphic plots were computed from autapse ramps. Burst spike frequency was computed from instantaneous ISIs during bursts only. Bursts were differentiated by the relatively long ISIs that separated them. Stellate cells tend to cluster their spikes under control conditons and spike frequency was computed from intra-cluster ISIs only. Clusters were automatically identified as any group of spikes separated by an ISI larger than Inline graphic ms. The same method was used to identify bursts. Frequency-current plots were made from the spike frequency measurements described above. Once burst spikes had been counted these numbers were averaged over multiple trials and significance computed with a one way ANOVA. AHP statistics were computed from spontaneous spiking when no autapse was present and was averaged over all detected spikes. Plots were produced in MATLAB and finalized with the Inkscape graphics editor (inkscape.org).

Supporting Information

Text S1

The stellate cells depolarizing afterpotential (DAP) is on the same time scale as the ISI of burst spikes. This implies that hyperexcitable firing may be facilitated by the presence of a DAP and that enhancements of the DAP, such as an autapse, would serve to enhance hyperexcitable firing behavior.

(0.03 MB ZIP)

Figure S1

Activation/deactivation curves (x1(V)) and voltage-dependent time scales (τx(V)) for Ip (x = p) and Ih (x = rf , rs) in the stellate cell model (1)–(3). The bottom panels are magnifications of the top ones.

(0.11 MB EPS)

Figure S2

Threshold values of GS⇔S as a function of Iapp,S (top panels) and Gh (bottom panels) for the SC model (7D) for two values of the isolated SC's firing frequency: (a) ∼3 Hz (3 spikes/sec), (b) ∼4 Hz (4 spikes per sec). Points in parameter space below and above the lines correspond to theta and fast firing frequency respectively. The values of Iapp,S and Gh corresponding to the same critical value of GS⇔S obey the quasi-linear curve shown in Fig. S3 to maintain a constant natural frequency for the isolated SC.

(0.07 MB EPS)

Figure S3

Curves of constant values of firing frequency for the (7D) SC model. The four higher firing frequencies (6 to 12 Hz) have been calculated as the reciprocal of the interspike interval. The lower two firing frequencies (3 and 4 Hz) have been approximated by the number of spikes per second. In the latter cases, the curves shown correspond to regular patterns displaying two and one subthreshold oscillations per spike respectively. The interspike interval slightly increases as the value of Iapp,S increases. (The M-current Im has not been included in these simulations.)

(0.05 MB EPS)

Figure S4

Voltage traces and phase-space diagram for the NAS-SC model in the theta regime (slow time scale). The value of Iapp,S = −2.35 is larger than the one corresponding to Fig. 7. The values of the other parameters are the same (Gh = 1.5, Gp = 0.5) as in Fig. 7. The bottom panels are a magnification of the top ones. (a) Voltage trace showing two subthreshold oscillations. (b) Two-dimensional representation of the phase-space. See main text for explanations.

(0.22 MB EPS)

Figure S5

Voltage traces (left) and two-dimensional phase-space representations for the NAS-SC model for values of Iapp,S that increase from Fig. 5-top (this figure) to Fig. 6-bottom (next figure). As the value of Iapp,S gradually increases, the V-nullsurface gradually moves down, thus facilitating firing; i.e., the firing frequency gradually increases.

(0.34 MB EPS)

Figure S6

Voltage traces (left) and two-dimensional phase-space representations for the NAS-SC model for values of Iapp,S that increase from Fig. 5-top (previous figure) to Fig. 6-bottom (this figure). As the value of Iapp,S gradually increases, the V-nullsurface gradually moves down, thus facilitating firing; i.e., the firing frequency gradually increases.

(0.21 MB EPS)

Figure S7

Effects of IM on hyper-excitability in single SCs self-connected with an autapse. (a) Persistent spiking patterns in the hyper-excitable firing regime in the absence of Im. (b) Bursting spiking patterns in the hyper-excitable regime in the presence of Im. The number of bursts per spike increases with increasing values of the maximal synaptic conductance. The following parameters were used: Gh = 1.5, Gp = 0.5 and Iapp,S = −2.5.

(0.23 MB EPS)

Figure S8

M-current block amplifies the depolarizing afterpotential (DAP) in stellate cells. Voltage traces from all cells used for analysis in panel (a) were scanned for spikes prior to the onset of the autapse (eg. control spiking where Gsyn,SS = 0). The voltage traces following those spikes were averaged. On a slow time scale (100s of ms) the DAP characteristic of stellate cells was obvious from this average as well as the tendency of stellate cells to cluster their spikes seen as the grouping of spikelets on the peak of the overshoot. Additionally, on a fast time scale (5–10 ms), the brief depolarization seen right after the spike (arrow) was amplified dramatically in the traces from cells treated with linopirdine. We note that this depolarization is on the timescale of the burst ISI.

(0.11 MB EPS)

Figure S9

Irregular spiking pattern in an isolated SC model with persistent sodium noise. (a) Voltage trace. The right panel is a magnification of the left one. (b) firing frequency histogram. The firing frequency r was calculated as the reciprocal of the interspike-interval multiplied by 1000 ms. Parameters used: Gh = 1.5, Gp = 0.5, Gq = 0.5, GSS = 0, D = 0.001. Spiking occurs only in the theta frequency regime.

(0.37 MB EPS)

Figure S10

Irregular spiking pattern in a self-connected SC model with persistent sodium noise. (a) Voltage trace. The right panel is a magnification of the left one. (b) firing frequency histogram. The firing frequency r was calculated as the reciprocal of the interspike-interval multiplied by 1000 ms. Parameters used: Gh = 1.5, Gp = 0.5, Gq = 0.5, GSS = 0.56, D = 0.001. Burst of fast frequency spikes. The intra-burst frequency corresponds to the fast time scale while the inter-burst frequency corresponds to the theta time scale.

(0.38 MB EPS)

Figure S11

Irregular spiking pattern in a self-connected SC model with persistent sodium noise. (a) Voltage trace. The right panel is a magnification of the left one. (b) firing frequency histogram. The firing frequency r was calculated as the reciprocal of the interspike-interval multiplied by 1000 ms. Parameters used: Gh = 1.5, Gp = 0.5, Gq = 0.15, GSS = 0.56, D = 0.001. Burst of fast frequency spikes. The intra-burst frequency corresponds to the fast time scale while the inter-burst frequency corresponds to the theta time scale.

(0.42 MB EPS)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Nancy Kopell, Mark Cunningham, John Huguenard and Paul Buckmaster for useful comments and discussions. TK and HGR would like to thank Fernando Fernandez and Michael N. Economo for useful comments and technical assistance. TK would like to thank the Bioengineering Department at the University of Utah for equipment support.

Footnotes

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Funding: This work was partially supported by the National Science Foundation DMS-0817241 (HGR), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (JW and TK), National Institue of Mental Health (JW and TK) and National Center for Research Resources (JW and TK). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Johnston D, Amaral DG. Hippocampus. In: Shepherd GM, editor. The Synaptic Organization of the Brain. (Oxford University Press); 2004. pp. 455–498. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Amaral DG, Witter MP. The hippocampus. In: Paxinos G, editor. The Rat Nervous System, 2nd ed. New York: Academic Press; 1995. pp. 443–493. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Scharfman HE, Witter MP, Schwarcz R. The Parahippocampal region: Implications for neurological and psychiatric diseases. 2000. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, V. 911. [PubMed]
  • 4.Dickson CT, Magistretti J, Shalinsky MH, Fransén E, Hasselmo M, et al. Properties and role of Ih in the pacing of subthreshold oscillation in entorhinal cortex layer II neurons. J Neurophysiol. 2000;83:2562–2579. doi: 10.1152/jn.2000.83.5.2562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Haas JS, White JA. Frequency selectivity of layer II stellate cells in the medial entorhinal cortex. J Neurophysiol. 2002;88:2422–2429. doi: 10.1152/jn.00598.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Schreiber S, Erchova I, Heinemann U, Herz AV. Subthreshold resonance explains the frequency-dependent integration of periodic as well as random stimuli in the entorhinal cortex. J Neurophysiol. 2004;92:408–415. doi: 10.1152/jn.01116.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Engel TA, Schimansky-Geier L, Herz AV, Schreiber S, Erchova I. Subthreshold membrane-potential resonances shape spike-train patterns in the entorhinal cortex. J Neurophysiol. 2008;100:1576–1588. doi: 10.1152/jn.01282.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Acker CD, Kopell N, White JA. Synchronization of strongly coupled excitatory neurons: relating network behavior to biophysics. Journal of Computational Neuroscience. 2003;15:71–90. doi: 10.1023/a:1024474819512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dudman JT, Nolan MF. Stochastically gating ion channels enable patterned spike firing through activity-dependent modulation of spike probability. PLoS Computational Biology. 2009;5:e1000290. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rotstein HG, Oppermann T, White JA, Kopell N. A reduced model for medial entorhinal cortex stellate cells: subthreshold oscillations, spiking and synchronization. Journal of Computational Neuroscience. 2006;21:271–292. doi: 10.1007/s10827-006-8096-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rotstein HG, Wechselberger M, Kopell N. Canard induced mixed-mode oscillations in a medial entorhinal cortex layer II stellate cell model. SIAM J Appl Dyn Sys. 2008;7:1582–1611. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Alonso AA, Llinás RR. Subthreshold Na+-dependent theta like rhythmicity in stellate cells of entorhinal cortex layer II. Nature. 1989;342:175–177. doi: 10.1038/342175a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Alonso AA, García Austt E. Neuronal sources of theta rhythm in the entorhinal cortex of the rat. II. phase relations between unit discharges and theta field potentials. Exp Brain Res. 1987;67:493–501. doi: 10.1007/BF00247283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fernandez R, White JA. Artificial synaptic conductances reduce subthreshold oscillations and periodic firing in stellate cells of the entorhinal cortex. J Neurosci. 2008;28:3790–3803. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5658-07.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Winson J. Loss of hippocampal theta rhythm results in spatial memory deficit in the rat. Science. 1978;201:160–163. doi: 10.1126/science.663646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Buzsáki G. Two-stage model of memory trace formation: a role for ‘noisy’ brain states. 1989;31:551–570. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(89)90423-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kahana MJ, Sekuler R, Caplan JB, Kirschen M, Madsen JR. Human theta oscillations exhibit task dependence during virtual maze navigation. Nature. 1999;399:781–784. doi: 10.1038/21645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rutishauser U, Ross IB, Mamelak AN, Schuman EM. Human memory strength is predicted by theta-frequency phase-locking of single neurons. Nature. 2010;464:903–907. doi: 10.1038/nature08860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Fyhn M, Molden S, Witter MP, I ME, Moser MB. Spatial representation in the entorhinal cortex. Science. 2004;305:1258–1264. doi: 10.1126/science.1099901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sargolini F, Fyhn M, Hafting T, McNaughton B, Witter MP, et al. Conjunctive representation of position, direction, and velocity in the entorhinal cortex. Science. 2006;312:758–762. doi: 10.1126/science.1125572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Moser E, M-B M. A metric for space. Hippocampus. 2008;18:1142–1156. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hafting T, Fyhn M, Molden S, Moser MB, Moser EI. Microstructure of a spatial map in the entorhinal cortex. Nature. 2005;436:801–806. doi: 10.1038/nature03721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bear J, Fountain NB, Lothman EW. Responses of superficial entorhinal cortex in vitro slices from naive and chronically epileptic rats. J Neurophysiol. 1996;76:2928–2940. doi: 10.1152/jn.1996.76.5.2928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Scharfman HE, Goodman JH, Du F, Schwarcz R. Chronic changes in synaptic responses of entorhinal hippocampal neurons after amino-oxyacetic acid (AOAA)-induced entorhinal cortical neuron loss. J Neurophysiol. 1998;80:3031–3046. doi: 10.1152/jn.1998.80.6.3031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tolner EA, Klosterman F, van Vliet EA, Witter MP, Lopes da Silva FH, et al. Presubiculum stimulation in vivo evokes distinct oscillations in superficial and deep entorhinal cortex layers in chronic epileptic rats. J Neurosci. 2005;25:8755–8765. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1165-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sloviter RS. Decreased hippocampal inhibition and a selective loos of interneurons in experimental epilepsy. Science. 1987;235:73–76. doi: 10.1126/science.2879352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bekenstein JW, Lothman EW. Dormancy of inhibitory interneurons in a model of temporal lobe epilepsy. Science. 1993;259:97–100. doi: 10.1126/science.8093417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Du F, Eid T, Lothman EE, Køler C, Schwarcz R. Preferntial neuronal loss in layer III of the medial entorhinal cortex in rat models of temporal lobe epilepsy. J Neurosci. 1995;15:6301–6313. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-10-06301.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Eid T, Schwarcz R, Ottersen OP. Ultrastructure and immunocytochemical distribution in layer III of the rat medial entorhinal cortex following aminooxyacetic acid-induced seizures. Exp Brain Res. 1999;125:463–475. doi: 10.1007/s002210050704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Schwarcz R, Tore E, Du F. Neurons in layer III of the entorhinal cortex: A role in epileptogenesis and epilepsy? Ann NY Acad Sci. 2000;911:328–342. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06735.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kumar SS, Buckmaster PS. Hyperexcitability, interneurons, and loss of GABAergic synapses in entorhinal cortex in a model of temporal lobe epilepsy. J Neurosci. 2006;26:4613–4623. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0064-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kumar SS, Jin X, Buckmaster PS, Huguenard JR. Recurrent circuits in layer II of medial entorhinal cortex in a model of temporal lobe epilepsy. J Neurosci. 2007;27:1239–1246. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3182-06.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Fransén E, Alonso AA, Dickson CT, Magistretti ME, Hasselmo J. Ionic mechanisms in the generation of subthreshold oscillations and action potential clustering in entorhinal layer II stellate neurons. Hippocampus. 2004;14:368–384. doi: 10.1002/hipo.10198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.White JA, Budde T, Kay AR. A bifurcation analysis of neuronal subthreshold oscillations. Biophysical J. 1995;69:1203–1217. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)79995-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.White JA, Klink R, Alonso A, Kay AR. Noise from voltage-gated ion channels may influence neuronal dynamics in the entorhinal cortex. J Neurophysiol. 1998;80:262–269. doi: 10.1152/jn.1998.80.1.262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wang XJ. Synaptic basis of cortical persistent activity: the importance of NMDA receptos to working memory. J Neurosci. 1999;19:9587–9603. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-21-09587.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Middleton S, Jalics J, Kispersky T, LeBeau FEN, Roopun AK, et al. NMDA receptor-dependent switching between different gamma rhythm-generating microcircuits in entorhinal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:18572–18577. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809302105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Rotstein HG, Pervouchine D, Gillies MJ, Acker CD, White JA, et al. Slow and fast inhibition and h-current interact to create a theta rhythm in a model of CA1 interneuron networks. J Neurophysiol. 2005;94:1509–1518. doi: 10.1152/jn.00957.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sutherland C, Doiron B, Longtin A. Feedback-induced gain control in stochastic spiking networks. 2009;100:475–489. doi: 10.1007/s00422-009-0298-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Drover J, Rubin J, Su J, Ermentrout B. Analysis of a canard mechanism by which excitatory synaptic coupling can synchronize neurons at low firing frequencies. SIAM J Appl Math. 2004;65:69–92. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Krupa M, Szmolyan P. Extending geometric singular perturbation theory to nonhyperbolic points - fold and canard points in two dimensions. SIAM J Math Anal. 2001;33(2):286–314. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Baer SM, Erneux T. Singular Hopf bifurcation to relaxation oscillations. SIAM J Appl Math. 1992;52:1651–1664. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Traub RD, Miles R, Wong RK. Model of the origin of rhythmic population oscillations in the hippocampal slice. Science. 1989;243:1319–1325. doi: 10.1126/science.2646715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Traub RD, Miles R, Wong RK. Models of synchronized hippocampal bursts in the presence of inhibition. I. single population events. J Neurophysiol. 1987;58:739–751. doi: 10.1152/jn.1987.58.4.739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Traub RD, Miles R, Wong SLSRK, Schneiderman JH. Models of synchronized hippocampal bursts in the presence of inhibition. I. ongoing spontaneous populations events. J Neurophysiol. 1987;58:752–764. doi: 10.1152/jn.1987.58.4.752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Traub RD, Miles R, Wong RK. Models of synchronous firing in longitudinal slices from the CA3 region of the hippocampus. J Neurophysiol. 1988;60:1481–1496. doi: 10.1152/jn.1988.60.4.1481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Wechselberger M. Existence and bifurcation of canards in R3 in the case of a folded node. SIAM J Appl Dyn Syst. 2005;4:101–139. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Yoshida M, Alonso A. Cell-type-specific modulation of intrinsic firing properties and subthreshold membrane oscillations by the M(Kv7)-currents in neurons of the entorhinal cortex. J Neurophysiol. 2007;98:2779–2994. doi: 10.1152/jn.00033.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Brown DA, Adams PR. Muscarinic supression of novel voltage-sensitive K+ current in a vertebrate neurone. Nature. 1980;283:673–676. doi: 10.1038/283673a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Yue C, Yaari Y. KCNQ/M channels control spike afterdepolarization and burst generation in hippocampal neurons. J Neurosci. 2004;24:4614–1624. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0765-04.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Jalics J, Krupa M, Rotstein HG. A novel mechanism for mixed-mode oscillations in a neuronal model. Dynamical Systems: An International Journal iFirst. 2010:1–38. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kobayashi M, Buckmaster PS. Reduced inhibition of dentate granule cells in a model of temporal lobe epilepsy. J Neurosci. 2003;23:2440–2452. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-06-02440.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.White JA, Haas JS. Intrinsic noise from voltage-gated ion channels: effects on dynamics and reliability in intrinsically oscillatory neurons. In Handbook of Biological Physics. 2001;4:257–278. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Netoff TI, Banks MI, Dorval AD, Acker CD, Haas JS, et al. Synchronization in hybrid neuronal networks of the hippocampal formation. J Neurophysiol. 2005;93:1197–1208. doi: 10.1152/jn.00982.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ben-Menachem E. Retigabine: Has the orphan found a home? Epilepsy Curr. 2007;7:153–154. doi: 10.1111/j.1535-7511.2007.00209.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Wang XJ, Buzsáki G. Gamma oscillations by synaptic inhibition in an interneuronal network model. J Neurosci. 1996;16:6402–6413. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-20-06402.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ermentrout GB. Simulating, analyzing, and animating dynamical systems. 2002. A guide to XPPAUT for researchers and students. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (Philadelphia, PA, USA)
  • 58.Burden RL, Faires JD. Numerical analysis. PWS Publishing Company - Boston; 1980. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Richardson MJE, Brunel N, Hakim V. From subthreshold to firing-rate resonance. J Neurophysiol. 2003;89:2538–2554. doi: 10.1152/jn.00955.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Izhikevich EM. Resonate-and-fire neurons. Neural Networks. 2001;14:883–894. doi: 10.1016/s0893-6080(01)00078-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Klink RM, Alonso AA. Ionic mechanisms of muscarinic depolarization in entorhinal cortex layer II neurons. J Neurophysiol. 1997;77:1829–1843. doi: 10.1152/jn.1997.77.4.1829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Dorval ADJ, White JA. Channel noise is essential for perithreshold oscillations in entorhinal stellate neurons. J Neurosci. 2005;25:10025–10028. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3557-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Destexhe A, Mainen ZF, Sejnowski TJ. Synthesis of models for excitable membranes, synaptic transmission and neuromodulation using a common kinetic formalism. Journal of Computational Neuroscience. 1994;3:195–230. doi: 10.1007/BF00961734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Text S1

The stellate cells depolarizing afterpotential (DAP) is on the same time scale as the ISI of burst spikes. This implies that hyperexcitable firing may be facilitated by the presence of a DAP and that enhancements of the DAP, such as an autapse, would serve to enhance hyperexcitable firing behavior.

(0.03 MB ZIP)

Figure S1

Activation/deactivation curves (x1(V)) and voltage-dependent time scales (τx(V)) for Ip (x = p) and Ih (x = rf , rs) in the stellate cell model (1)–(3). The bottom panels are magnifications of the top ones.

(0.11 MB EPS)

Figure S2

Threshold values of GS⇔S as a function of Iapp,S (top panels) and Gh (bottom panels) for the SC model (7D) for two values of the isolated SC's firing frequency: (a) ∼3 Hz (3 spikes/sec), (b) ∼4 Hz (4 spikes per sec). Points in parameter space below and above the lines correspond to theta and fast firing frequency respectively. The values of Iapp,S and Gh corresponding to the same critical value of GS⇔S obey the quasi-linear curve shown in Fig. S3 to maintain a constant natural frequency for the isolated SC.

(0.07 MB EPS)

Figure S3

Curves of constant values of firing frequency for the (7D) SC model. The four higher firing frequencies (6 to 12 Hz) have been calculated as the reciprocal of the interspike interval. The lower two firing frequencies (3 and 4 Hz) have been approximated by the number of spikes per second. In the latter cases, the curves shown correspond to regular patterns displaying two and one subthreshold oscillations per spike respectively. The interspike interval slightly increases as the value of Iapp,S increases. (The M-current Im has not been included in these simulations.)

(0.05 MB EPS)

Figure S4

Voltage traces and phase-space diagram for the NAS-SC model in the theta regime (slow time scale). The value of Iapp,S = −2.35 is larger than the one corresponding to Fig. 7. The values of the other parameters are the same (Gh = 1.5, Gp = 0.5) as in Fig. 7. The bottom panels are a magnification of the top ones. (a) Voltage trace showing two subthreshold oscillations. (b) Two-dimensional representation of the phase-space. See main text for explanations.

(0.22 MB EPS)

Figure S5

Voltage traces (left) and two-dimensional phase-space representations for the NAS-SC model for values of Iapp,S that increase from Fig. 5-top (this figure) to Fig. 6-bottom (next figure). As the value of Iapp,S gradually increases, the V-nullsurface gradually moves down, thus facilitating firing; i.e., the firing frequency gradually increases.

(0.34 MB EPS)

Figure S6

Voltage traces (left) and two-dimensional phase-space representations for the NAS-SC model for values of Iapp,S that increase from Fig. 5-top (previous figure) to Fig. 6-bottom (this figure). As the value of Iapp,S gradually increases, the V-nullsurface gradually moves down, thus facilitating firing; i.e., the firing frequency gradually increases.

(0.21 MB EPS)

Figure S7

Effects of IM on hyper-excitability in single SCs self-connected with an autapse. (a) Persistent spiking patterns in the hyper-excitable firing regime in the absence of Im. (b) Bursting spiking patterns in the hyper-excitable regime in the presence of Im. The number of bursts per spike increases with increasing values of the maximal synaptic conductance. The following parameters were used: Gh = 1.5, Gp = 0.5 and Iapp,S = −2.5.

(0.23 MB EPS)

Figure S8

M-current block amplifies the depolarizing afterpotential (DAP) in stellate cells. Voltage traces from all cells used for analysis in panel (a) were scanned for spikes prior to the onset of the autapse (eg. control spiking where Gsyn,SS = 0). The voltage traces following those spikes were averaged. On a slow time scale (100s of ms) the DAP characteristic of stellate cells was obvious from this average as well as the tendency of stellate cells to cluster their spikes seen as the grouping of spikelets on the peak of the overshoot. Additionally, on a fast time scale (5–10 ms), the brief depolarization seen right after the spike (arrow) was amplified dramatically in the traces from cells treated with linopirdine. We note that this depolarization is on the timescale of the burst ISI.

(0.11 MB EPS)

Figure S9

Irregular spiking pattern in an isolated SC model with persistent sodium noise. (a) Voltage trace. The right panel is a magnification of the left one. (b) firing frequency histogram. The firing frequency r was calculated as the reciprocal of the interspike-interval multiplied by 1000 ms. Parameters used: Gh = 1.5, Gp = 0.5, Gq = 0.5, GSS = 0, D = 0.001. Spiking occurs only in the theta frequency regime.

(0.37 MB EPS)

Figure S10

Irregular spiking pattern in a self-connected SC model with persistent sodium noise. (a) Voltage trace. The right panel is a magnification of the left one. (b) firing frequency histogram. The firing frequency r was calculated as the reciprocal of the interspike-interval multiplied by 1000 ms. Parameters used: Gh = 1.5, Gp = 0.5, Gq = 0.5, GSS = 0.56, D = 0.001. Burst of fast frequency spikes. The intra-burst frequency corresponds to the fast time scale while the inter-burst frequency corresponds to the theta time scale.

(0.38 MB EPS)

Figure S11

Irregular spiking pattern in a self-connected SC model with persistent sodium noise. (a) Voltage trace. The right panel is a magnification of the left one. (b) firing frequency histogram. The firing frequency r was calculated as the reciprocal of the interspike-interval multiplied by 1000 ms. Parameters used: Gh = 1.5, Gp = 0.5, Gq = 0.15, GSS = 0.56, D = 0.001. Burst of fast frequency spikes. The intra-burst frequency corresponds to the fast time scale while the inter-burst frequency corresponds to the theta time scale.

(0.42 MB EPS)


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES