Abstract
Glycosaminoglycans (GAG) play decisive roles in various cardio-vascular & cancer-associated processes. Changes in the expression of GAG fine structures, attributed to deregulation of their biosynthetic and catabolic enzymes, are hallmarks of vascular dysfunction and tumor progression. Wide spread role of GAG chains in blood clotting, wound healing and tumor biology has led to the development of modified GAG chains, GAG binding peptides and GAG based enzyme inhibitors as therapeutic agents. Xylosides, carrying hydrophobic aglycone, are known to induce GAG biosynthesis in various systems. Given the important roles of GAG chains in vascular and tumor biology, we envision that RGD-conjugated xylosides could be targeted to activated endothelial and cancer cells, which are known to express αvβ3 integrin, and thereby, modulate the pathological processes. To accomplish this vision, xylose residue was conjugated to linear and cyclic RGD containing peptides using click chemistry. Our results demonstrate that RGD-conjugated xylosides are able to prime GAG chains in various cell types, and future studies are aimed toward evaluating potential utility of such xylosides in treating myocardial infarction as well as cancer-associated thrombotic complications.
Keywords: Proteoglycans, Glycosaminoglycans, Xylosides, RGD targeting, Biosynthesis
INTRODUCTION
Proteoglycan (PG) consists of a core protein and one or more GAG chains. There are four major classes of sulfated GAG chains: heparan sulfate (HS), chondroitin sulfate (CS), dermatan sulfate (DS) and keratan sulfate. GAG side chains of PGs play an important role in various cardiovascular functions including haemostasis and thrombosis [1] . HS chain that contains a specific pentasaccharide sequence functions as endogenous anticoagulant through inhibition of factor Xa by activating anti-thrombin III (ATIII) [2–4]. One of the main causes of myocardial infarction (MI), a devastating disease that kills several million people worldwide annually, is formation of thrombi inside the coronary artery through platelet activation/aggregation. GAG side chains also play a major role in various cancer processes. Dramatic changes in the expression of biosynthetic and catabolic enzymes are attributed to alterations in GAG fine structures, which are suggested to affect tumor cell growth, invasion and metastasis [5, 6]. For example, heparanase, a β-endoglucuronidase, which is over expressed in a variety of malignant tumors, cleaves HS chains into smaller biologically active oligosaccharides that promote cancer growth, angiogenesis, tumor-cell invasion and migration [7–9]. Melanoma associated CS and DS chains have been shown to stimulate tumor cell proliferation [10] while these GAG chains have been shown to surprisingly suppress angiogenesis [11].
Heparin, structurally similar to HS, has been in use as a major anticoagulant for seven decades because of its abundance, cost and potency. It is used as a blood thinner in surgical procedures and in tackling thrombotic complications associated with various cardiovascular and cerebrovascular dysfunctions. Heparin is also known to affect tumor biology in a variety of ways [11–13]. It decreases thrombin generation and fibrin formation, inhibits heparanase, modulates P-selectin-vascular wall interactions and adhesion. A chemically modified non-anticoagulant heparin-like molecule is shown to reduce metastasis by more than 50% [11]. In various clinical trials, low molecular weight heparin is shown to increase survival rate among patients with advanced malignancy.
Several animal derived GAGs and their derivatives have been in use as therapeutics to tackle thrombosis, MI and cancer. However, direct administration of these GAG chains faces the problem of molecular heterogeneity, possible contamination with pathogens or intentional chemical adulteration as evidenced in the latest tragic episode of heparin contamination [14, 15]. Furthermore, it is administered intravenously which makes it is less attractive for those who require prolonged prophylactic treatment. An attractive alternative approach would be the use of xylosides to induce endogenous GAG chain biosynthesis without a core protein at specific sites. Xylosides containing a hydrophobic aglycone can compete with endogenous core protein acceptor sites for assembly of GAG chains in the Golgi apparatus [16–22]. The hydrophobic aglycone helps xylosides pass through the membrane and hence increases priming activity/production of GAG chains and its oral bioavailability. Interestingly, the composition of primed GAG chains depends on the structure of the aglycone moiety [23–25].
Arginine-glycine-aspartate (RGD) selectively binds to αvβ3 integrin which is abundantly expressed on the surface of many tumor cell types and activated endothelial cells surrounding cancer and myocardial infarction. Linear and cyclic peptide sequences containing RGD motifs have been employed as targeting vectors for selective delivery of therapeutic and diagnostic agents by conjugating them to RGD sequences [26–30] . Moreover, RGD derivatives are also shown to interact selectively with GPIIb/IIIa receptor and therefore inhibit platelet aggregation [31]. Therefore, RGD-conjugated xylosides are predicted to have a dual use as anticoagulants as well as anti-platelet agents in tackling thrombotic complications associated with MI, cancer and other disease conditions. Here, we describe the synthesis of RGD- conjugated xylosides using click-chemistry and report on their GAG priming activity in a variety of cellular systems.
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
Materials
Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell line, pgsA-745, which is defective in xylosyl transferase, was obtained from American type culture collection. The cell culture reagents for CHO cell line were obtained from HyClone. Bovine lung microvascular endothelial cell (BLMVEC) and Mouse breast cancer cells (4T1) were gifts from Dr Randall Bull and Dr David Bull, University of Utah, respectively. The cell culture reagents for BLMVEC and 4T1 (MCDB-131 complete) were obtained from Vec Technologies. Na235SO4 was purchased from MP Biochemicals and Ultima-FloAP scintillation cocktail for flow scintillation analysis was obtained from PerkinElmer Life Sciences. All other chemicals and biochemicals were obtained from Sigma. Linear RGD peptide 4 was synthesized using peptide synthesizer available through core facilities at the University of Utah, and cyclic RGD peptide 7 was purchased from Peptides International Inc. The DEAE-Sepharose gel was purchased from Amersham Biosciences. The anion-exchange chromatography column TSK-GEL DEAE-3SW (7.4 mm × 7.5 cm, 10 μm particle size) and the size exclusion chromatography columns G3000SWXL (7.8 mm × 30 cm) were obtained from Tosoh bioscience.
General synthetic procedures
Anhydrous solvents were purchased and used directly or dried over standard drying agents and freshly distilled prior to use. Reactions were monitored by TLC on silica gel 60 F254 with detection by Von’s reagent. Intermediate compounds were purified by flash chromatography columns using silica gel 60 (230–400 mesh) and were run under pressure at 5–7 psi. Final products were purified by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) on reverse phase C18 column (VYDAC 2.2 cm × 25 cm) with solvent A (25 mM formic acid in water) and solvent B (95% acetonitrile) at a flow rate of 5 ml/min in a linear gradient over 120 minutes starting with 0% B. All synthetic compounds were characterized by mercury 400 MHz spectrometry. The compounds were also confirmed for their final structures using a Finnigan LCQ mass spectrometry in either positive or negative ion mode.
2,3,4-Tri-O-Acetyl-β-D-xylopyranosyl azide (1)
Trimethylsilyl azide (1.5 mmol) and SnCl4 (0.5 mmol ) were added dropwise to a stirred solution of fully acetylated xylose derivative (1 mmol) in dry CH2Cl2, and stirring was continued at room temperature. The progress of the reaction was checked by TLC, and after the completion of the reaction, the reaction mixture was then evaporated under vacuum to give a residue that was further purified by low pressure flash silica column chromatography to yield the compound 1 [32].
N-(2,3,4-tri-O-acetyl-β-D-xylopyranosyl) chloroacetamide (2)
2,3,4-Tri-O-Acetyl-β-D-xylopyranosyl azide (1) (1 mmol) was dissolved in dry CH2Cl2 (20ml). The mixture was cooled at 0 °C. Chloroacetic anhydride (1 mmol) was added to the solution, followed by tri-phenyl phosphine (1 mmol), and the reaction was continued overnight. After the reaction was complete, the solvent was removed using rotary evaporator under reduced pressure. The reaction mixture was extracted using ethyl acetate and water. The organic layer was washed with saturated brine solution and evaporated under vacuum to give a residue, which was purified by silica column chromatography to give the title compound 2 [33].
N-(2,3,4-tri-O-acetyl-β-xylopyranosyl) azidoacetamide (3)
N-(2,3,4-tri-O-acetyl-β-D-xylopyranosyl) chloroacetamide (2) (1 mmol) was taken in a 100 ml RB flask and dry DMF (20 ml) was added, followed by the addition of sodium azide (2 mmol). The reaction mixture was heated to 90 °C under stirring. Progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC using ethyl acetate and hexane (1:1) as the eluant. After the reaction was complete, the reaction mixture was cooled and diluted with ethyl acetate. The organic layer was washed with water, dried over sodium sulfate and concentrated to obtain a syrupy materials that was further purified by silica flash column chromatography to give the title compound 3 [34].
Propargylated cyclic RGD (8)
Propiolic acid (10 mmol) was taken in a RB flask and dry DMF (20 ml) was added, followed by addition of hydroxybenzotriazole (5 mmol) and 1, 3-dispropylcarbodimide (5 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred for one hour before cyclic RGD (1 mmol) was added, and stirred for another hour. Reaction mixture was evaporated using rotary evaporator under reduced pressure. The reaction mixture was purified by HPLC-reverse phase C18 column with solvent A (25 mM formic acid in water) and solvent B (95% acetonitrile) in a linear gradient starting with 0% B to give the pure compound 8.
Preparation of RGD-conjugated xylosides (5, 6 and 9)
To a solution of alkyne group containing linear or cyclic RGD derivative (1 mmol) and xylosyl azide derivative (1 mmol) in DMF (8 ml) /water (2.6 ml) mixture, sodium ascorbate (0.8 mmol) was added, followed by Cu2SO4.5 H20 (0.4 mmol) at room temperature and the mixture was stirred until disappearance of the starting materials as indicated by TLC. At the end of the reaction, the reaction mixture was concentrated using rotary evaporator under reduced pressure. The reaction mixture was purified by HPLC-reverse phase C18 column with solvent A (25 mM formic acid in water) and solvent B (95% acetonitrile) to give the final compounds, 5, 6 & 9. Compound 5: 1H NMR (CD3OD): δ 8.07 (s, 1H), 5.97 (d, J = 8.98 Hz, 1H), 5.55-5.44 (m, 2H), 5.20-5.14 (m, 1H), 4.58 (t, J = 4.68 Hz, 1H), 4.46 (dd, J = 15.62 Hz, 24.80 Hz, 2H), 4.41-4.36 (m, 1H), 4.22 (dd, J = 5.47 Hz, 11.33 Hz, 1H), 4.02 (d, J = 17.18 Hz, 1H), 3.74 (t, J = 10.54 Hz, 1H), 3.72 (d, J = 16.79 Hz, 1H), 3.26-3.20 (m, 1H), 3.12-3.05 (m, 1H), 2.92 (dd, J = 4.3 Hz, 16.60 Hz, 1H), 2.53 (dd, J = 5.08 Hz, 16.40 Hz, 1H ), 2.04 (s, 3H), 2.01 (s, 3H), 2.00 (s, 3H), 1.82 (s, 3H), 1.70-1.64 (m, 2H); MS (ESI): calcd for C28H43N10O13 [M+H]+ 727.2932; found 727.3333. Compound 6: 1H NMR (CD3OD): δ 7.86 (s, 1H), 5.28 (t, J = 9.37 Hz, 1H), 5.20 (d, J = 8.98 Hz, 1H), 5.12 (d, J = 1.95 Hz, 1H), 4.58-4.57 (m, 1H), 4.53 (s, 1H), 4.44 (s, 1H), 4.40-4.35 (m, 1H), 4.06-4.02 (m, 1H), 3.98 (s, 1H), 3.72 (d, J = 16.79 Hz, 1H), 3.48 (t, J = 11.13 Hz, 1H), 3.25-3.22 (m, 1H), 3.13-3.08 (m, 1H), 2.92 (dd, J = 4.3 Hz, 16.4 Hz, 1H), 2.50 (dd, J = 4.69 Hz, 16.60 Hz, 1H), 2.06-1.96 (m, 12 H), 1.68-1.63 (m, 2H) ; MS (ESI): calcd for C30H46N11O14 [M+H]+ 784.3226; found 784.3400. Compound 9: 1H NMR (CD3OD): δ 8.65 (s, 1H), 8.60 (s, 1H), 8.34 (s, 1H), 7.86 (d, J = 6.64 Hz, 1H), 7.54 (t, J = 7.81 Hz, 1H), 7.25-7.16 (m, 3H), 6.09 (d, J = 8.98 Hz, 1H), 5.62-5.56 (m, 1H), 5.50 (t, J = 8.98 Hz, 1H), 5.24-5.18 (m, 1H), 4.66 (t, J = 5.08 Hz, 1H), 4.54 (t, J = 6.64 Hz, 1H), 4.41 (t, J = 6.64 Hz, 1H), 4.30-4.24 (m, 2H), 4.07-3.90 (m, 3H), 3.80-3.68 (m, 3H), 3.55-3.47 (m, 2H), 3.25-3.12 (m, 2H), 3.03 (t, J = 13.58 Hz, 1H), 2.93 (dd, J = 6.65 Hz, 13.28 Hz, 1H), 2.69-2.59 (m, 2H), 2.04 (s, 3H), 2.02 (s, 3H), 1.83 (s, 3H), 1.76-1.67 (m, 2H), 1.58-1.51 (m, 3H), 1.44-1.28 (m, 3H), 1.16-1.01 (m, 2H); MS (ESI): calcd for C41H57N12O15 [M+H]+ 957.3988; found 957.2667.
Screening of RGD-xylosides in CHO cells, endothelial cells (BLMEC) and cancer cells (4T1)
To determine whether the RGD-xylosides were able to prime GAG chains, the cells were treated with RGD-conjugated xylosides at various concentrations in the presence of Na235SO4. GAG chains were purified and analyzed as described below. 1x105 cells were plated per well in complete growth medium in a 24 well plate. The cells were incubated at 37 °C in a humidified incubator for 24 h to a confluence of about 50%. The cells were washed with sterile PBS and replaced with 495 μL Ham’s/F12 containing 10% dialyzed FBS. Solution containing a specific primer at 100X the final concentration was prepared. 5 μL of appropriate 100X primer was added to various wells to yield the appropriate concentration and 50 μCi of Na235SO4 was also added to each well as tracer. The 24-well plates were incubated at 37 °C in a humidified incubator (5% CO2) for 24 h.
Purification and quantitation of GAG chains
The entire contents of the wells were transferred to a microcentrifuge tube and subjected to centrifugation at 16000 x g for 5 min. The supernatant was transferred to a fresh tube and 0.016 % Triton X-100 (1.5 volumes) was added. The diluted supernatant was loaded on 0.2 ml DEAE-sepharose column pre-equilibrated with 2 ml of wash buffer (20 mM NaOAc, 0.1 M NaCl and 0.01% Triton X-100, pH 6.0) and the column was washed with 6 ml of wash buffer. The bound HS/CS was eluted using 1.2 ml of elution buffer (20 mM NaOAc and 1 M NaCl, pH 6.0). The priming activities of xylosides 5, 6 & 9 were evaluated by quantitating the 35S-radioactivity incorporated in to the purified HS/CS chains by liquid scintillation counter.
Sulfate density analysis of GAG chains
The purified GAG chains were analyzed by HPLC coupled to an inline radiomatic detector. Xyloside primed GAG chains of equal quantity was diluted five-fold with HPLC solvent A (10 mM KH2PO4, pH 6.0, 0.2% CHAPS) for anion exchange chromatography analysis. The sample was loaded on HPLC-DEAE column and eluted from the column with a linear gradient of 0.2 M - 1 M NaCl over 80 minutes at a flow rate of 1ml/min. The radioactive GAG chains were detected by radiomatic flo-one A505A detector. The HPLC effluent was mixed with Ultima-Flo AP scintillation cocktail in a 2:1 ratio and detected in the flow scintillation analyzer.
Chain length analysis of GAG chains primed by RGD-xylosides
The chain length of the GAG chains synthesized by various RGD-xyloside conjugates was determined by measuring migration time on size exclusion column using HPLC with inline radiodetector. The GAG chains were loaded on to two tandem G3000SWXL columns (Tosoh, 7.8 mm × 30 cm) and analyzed with the aid of inline radiodetector using phosphate buffer (100 mM KH2PO4, 100 mM NaCl, pH 6) as eluant. The average molecular weight was determined by measuring the migration time of GAG chains in comparison to those of polystyrene sulfonate standards performed under similar conditions.
RESULTS & DISCUSSION
Synthesis of RGD-Xylosides
In recent years, there has been great interest in assembling a number of biologically active carbohydrate conjugates using click chemistry because of its mild reaction conditions, the generation of regioselective molecules with high efficiency in water and compatible with most functional groups in biological systems [35–37]. This bioconjugation approach relies on the Cu(I)-catalyzed orthogonal reaction of azide containing xylosyl scaffold with terminal alkyne containing RGD motifs in the presence of other reactive functional groups. Furthermore, this approach offers two advantages: a) the 1, 2, 3-triazole ring, generated during the click-chemistry, is a metabolically stable linker between xylose residue and RGD peptide; b) the triazole ring can facilitate hydrogen-bonding interactions resulting in favorable and productive biological effect.
Xylosyl azide 1 was converted into 3 by first converting the azide group into the chloroacetamide and then the replacement of chloride group with azide as shown in Scheme 1. These two xylosyl derivatives, 1 & 3, contain reactive azide group for orthogonal coupling with RGD peptides containing terminal alkyne group in the subsequent steps. RGD peptides, 4 and 7, were purchased from commercial sources. These RGD peptides were coupled with propargyl amine using well established coupling procedure. In a similar manner, cyclic RGD peptide 7 containing side chain amine group was reacted with propargylic acid under similar conditions to obtain propargylated cyclic RGD peptide 8 in high yield as shown in Scheme 3. After preparing appropriate orthogonally functionalized RGD peptides and xylosides, we turned to assembling RGD-conjugated xylosides, 5, 6 and 9, using click-chemistry as described in Schemes 2 and 3. The final products were purified on reverse phase C18 column using HPLC as described in the experimental section.
Priming Activity of RGD-Xylosides in CHO cells
The very first step in the biosynthesis of proteoglycans is the xylosylation of certain serine residues of the core protein [38]. Following xylosylation of the core protein, a tetrasaccharide linkage region, which serves as an acceptor site for elongation of GAG chains, is assembled [39–42]. It has been known over three decades that GAG chains can also be assembled on xylosides without a core protein provided xylosides carry hydrophobic aglycone [20, 22]. We have synthesized various click-xylosides with hydrophobic moiety and demonstrated their ability to induce GAG chains in a cellular system [23]. A mutant Chinese hamster ovary [CHO] cell line, pgsA-745, is a convenient cellular system for determining the priming activity of exogenously supplied RGD-conjugated xylosides because this cell line lacks active xylosyltransferase enzyme and therefore does not make endogenous GAG chains [43]. Thus, it is easier to determine whether RGD-conjugated xylosides induce GAG chains using this cell line. RGD-conjugated xylosides were screened in cell culture at various concentrations [10, 30, 100 and 300 μM). We found that the nature of linkage between xylose and RGD can affect the priming activity (Figure 1). The results from priming activity analysis suggest that RGD-xyloside 5 is a better GAG primer than RGD-xyloside 6 at 100 μM and 300 μM. Therefore, the GAG chains primed by xyloside 5 were further analyzed for their sulfation pattern by DEAE-anion exchange HPLC column and for their molecular weights using size exclusion columns as outlined in the experimental section. It is interesting to note that the extent of sulfation of GAG chains primed by xylosides at 100 μM and 300 μM are nearly identical suggesting that these concentrations are optimal for GAG induction without challenging the Golgi machinery (Figure 2). Nevertheless, Xyloside 5 primed nearly three times more GAG chains at 300 μM compare to 100 μM in CHO cells. The chain length of GAG chains primed by xyloside 5 in CHO cells was determined by measuring migration time of GAG chains in comparison to those of polystyrene sulfonate standards performed under similar conditions on size exclusion analyses suggest that GAG chains, primed by xyloside 5 in CHO cells, have an average molecular weight of 45 KDa at 100 μM and 19 KDa at 300 μM concentration.
Cyclic RGD peptides are shown to bind more selectively than their linear motifs to αvβ3 integrin expressing activated endothelial cells and cancer cell lines [28, 44, 45]. Therefore, we synthesized xyloside conjugated to cyclic-RGD peptide motif (8) using click-chemistry (Scheme 3). It is interesting to note that xyloside 9 primed GAG chains whose average molecular weight is higher than those primed by xyloside 5 in CHO cells. Xyloside 9 primed GAG chains migrated between 20 – 28 minutes in size exclusion column with average molecular weight of 67 KDa in comparison to those of polystyrene sulfonate standard (Figure 3). GAG chains primed by xylosides 5 and 9 were digested with heparin lyases I, II and III to determine HS/CS composition. It is interesting to note that xyloside 5 primed about 50% HS chains whereas Xylsoide 9 primed about 25% HS chains. Xyloside 6, on the other hand, primed about 80 % HS chains even though this scaffold has lower priming activity than Xyloside 5.
Priming Activity of xylosides in endothelial cells (BLMVEC) and cancer cell line (4T1)
αvβ3 integrin receptors are elevated in activated endothelial cells, angiogenic cardiomyocytes and highly vascularized cancer cells, and therefore, RGD-conjugated xylosides are expected to be up taken by these cells. For these reasons, we chose to determine the priming activity of RGD-conjugated xylosides in endothelial cells (BLMVEC) and mouse breast cancer cell line (4T1). The priming activity of RGD xylosides in endothelial cells and cancer cells are determined as described earlier for CHO cells. The xyloside 5 did prime on both endothelial cells and cancer cells (Figure 4, Figure 5). Xyloside 5 was able to induce GAG chains by 6-fold in endothelial cells and 3-fold in cancer cell line. Molecular weight of GAG chains primed by xyloside 5 was found to be ~ 10 KDa in endothelial cell and cancer cell line. It was disappointing to note that cyclic-RGD conjugated xyloside 9 was unable to prime GAG chains in either endothelial cells or cancer cell line. It is possible that cyclic-RGD motif may prevent the selective transport of xyloside to Golgi machinery where they prime GAG chains. Alternatively, cyclic motif may sterically interfere with biosynthetic enzymes preventing the priming of GAG chains by xyloside 9. For these reasons, we plan to make a library of cyclic-RGD motifs with variable distance between xylose and the peptide with an aim to discover new scaffolds that prime GAG chains.
In summary, we have successfully synthesized RGD-conjugated xylosides that target cells displaying the αvβ3 integrin using click chemistry. These RGD-conjugated homing xylosides are able to prime GAG chains in various cellular systems indicating their likely applications in tackling MI, thrombosis and cancer associated vascular complications where GAG chains are known to modulate various pathological processes. Future studies will focus on the synthesis of additional homing xylosides, and evaluation of their pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in various animal models.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by NIH (GM075168) and Human Frontier Science Program grants to BK.
ABBREVIATIONS
- GAG chains
Glycosaminoglycans
- RGD
Arginine-Glycine-Aspartate
- HS
Heparan Sulfate
- CS
Chondroitin Sulfate
- DS
Dermatan Sulfate
- BLMVEC
Bovine Lung Endothelial vascular Cell
- 4T1
Mouse Breast Cancer Cell
References
- 1.Cummings RD. The repertoire of glycan determinants in the human glycome. Mol Biosyst. 2009;5:1087–1104. doi: 10.1039/b907931a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Damus PS, Hicks M, Rosenberg RD. Anticoagulant action of heparin. Nature. 1973;246:355–357. doi: 10.1038/246355a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hopwood J, Hook M, Linker A, Lindahl U. Anticoagulant activity of heparin: isolation of antithrombin-binding sites. FEBS Lett. 1976;69:51–54. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(76)80651-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kuberan B, Lech MZ, Beeler DL, Wu ZL, Rosenberg RD. Enzymatic synthesis of antithrombin III-binding heparan sulfate pentasaccharide. Nat Biotechnol. 2003;21:1343–1346. doi: 10.1038/nbt885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sasisekharan R, Shriver Z, Venkataraman G, Narayanasami U. Roles of heparan-sulphate glycosaminoglycans in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:521–528. doi: 10.1038/nrc842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Raman K, Kuberan B. Chemical Tumor Biology of Heparan Sulfate Proteoglycans. Curr Chem Biol. 2010;4:20–31. doi: 10.2174/187231310790226206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Purushothaman A, Chen L, Yang Y, Sanderson RD. Heparanase stimulation of protease expression implicates it as a master regulator of the aggressive tumor phenotype in myeloma. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:32628–32636. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M806266200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Fux L, Ilan N, Sanderson RD, Vlodavsky I. Heparanase: busy at the cell surface. Trends Biochem Sci. 2009;34:511–519. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2009.06.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Vlodavsky I, Ilan N, Nadir Y, Brenner B, Katz BZ, Naggi A, Torri G, Casu B, Sasisekharan R. Heparanase, heparin and the coagulation system in cancer progression. Thromb Res. 2007;120 (Suppl 2):S112–120. doi: 10.1016/S0049-3848(07)70139-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yang J, Price MA, Neudauer CL, Wilson C, Ferrone S, Xia H, Iida J, Simpson MA, McCarthy JB. Melanoma chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan enhances FAK and ERK activation by distinct mechanisms. J Cell Biol. 2004;165:881–891. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200403174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yip GW, Smollich M, Gotte M. Therapeutic value of glycosaminoglycans in cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2006;5:2139–2148. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Varki NM, Varki A. Heparin inhibition of selectin-mediated interactions during the hematogenous phase of carcinoma metastasis: rationale for clinical studies in humans. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2002;28:53–66. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-20564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Borsig L, Wong R, Feramisco J, Nadeau DR, Varki NM, Varki A. Heparin and cancer revisited: mechanistic connections involving platelets, P-selectin, carcinoma mucins, and tumor metastasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:3352–3357. doi: 10.1073/pnas.061615598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kishimoto TK, Viswanathan K, Ganguly T, Elankumaran S, Smith S, Pelzer K, Lansing JC, Sriranganathan N, Zhao G, Galcheva-Gargova Z, Al-Hakim A, Bailey GS, Fraser B, Roy S, Rogers-Cotrone T, Buhse L, Whary M, Fox J, Nasr M, Dal Pan GJ, Shriver Z, Langer RS, Venkataraman G, Austen KF, Woodcock J, Sasisekharan R. Contaminated heparin associated with adverse clinical events and activation of the contact system. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2457–2467. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0803200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Blossom DB, Kallen AJ, Patel PR, Elward A, Robinson L, Gao G, Langer R, Perkins KM, Jaeger JL, Kurkjian KM, Jones M, Schillie SF, Shehab N, Ketterer D, Venkataraman G, Kishimoto TK, Shriver Z, McMahon AW, Austen KF, Kozlowski S, Srinivasan A, Turabelidze G, Gould CV, Arduino MJ, Sasisekharan R. Outbreak of adverse reactions associated with contaminated heparin. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2674–2684. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0806450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gibson KD, Segen BJ, Audhya TK. The effect of beta-D-xylosides on chondroitin sulphate biosynthesis in embryonic chicken cartilage in the absence of protein synthesis inhibitors. Biochem J. 1977;162:217–233. doi: 10.1042/bj1620217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Schwartz NB, Ho PL, Dorfman A. Effect of beta-xylosides on synthesis of cartilage-specific proteoglycan in chondrocyte cultures. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1976;71:851–856. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(76)90909-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Robinson HC, Brett MJ, Tralaggan PJ, Lowther DA, Okayama M. The effect of D-xylose, beta-D-xylosides and beta-D-galactosides on chondroitin sulphate biosynthesis in embryonic chicken cartilage. Biochem J. 1975;148:25–34. doi: 10.1042/bj1480025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Galligani L, Hopwood J, Schwartz NB, Dorfman A. Stimulation of synthesis of free chondroitin sulfate chains by beta-D-xylosides in cultured cells. J Biol Chem. 1975;250:5400–5406. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Schwartz NB, Galligani L, Ho PL, Dorfman A. Stimulation of synthesis of free chondroitin sulfate chains by beta-D-xylosides in cultured cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974;71:4047–4051. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.10.4047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Abrahamsson CO, Ellervik U, Eriksson-Bajtner J, Jacobsson M, Mani K. Xylosylated naphthoic acid-amino acid conjugates for investigation of glycosaminoglycan priming. Carbohyd Res. 2008;343:1473–1477. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2008.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Okayama M, Kimata K, Suzuki S. The influence of p-nitrophenyl beta-d-xyloside on the synthesis of proteochondroitin sulfate by slices of embryonic chick cartilage. J Biochem. 1973;74:1069–1073. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kuberan B, Ethirajan M, Victor XV, Tran V, Nguyen K, Do A. “Click” xylosides initiate glycosaminoglycan biosynthesis in a mammalian cell line. Chembiochem. 2008;9:198–200. doi: 10.1002/cbic.200700494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Fritz TA, Lugemwa FN, Sarkar AK, Esko JD. Biosynthesis of heparan sulfate on beta-D-xylosides depends on aglycone structure. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:300–307. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Victor XV, Nguyen TK, Ethirajan M, Tran VM, Nguyen KV, Kuberan B. Investigating the elusive mechanism of glycosaminoglycan biosynthesis. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:25842–25853. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.043208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.DeNardo SJ, Burke PA, Leigh BR, O'Donnell RT, Miers LA, Kroger LA, Goodman SL, Matzku S, Jonczyk A, Lamborn KR, DeNardo GL. Neovascular targeting with cyclic RGD peptide (cRGDf-ACHA) to enhance delivery of radioimmunotherapy. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2000;15:71–79. doi: 10.1089/cbr.2000.15.71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Meyer A, Auernheimer J, Modlinger A, Kessler H. Targeting RGD recognizing integrins: drug development, biomaterial research, tumor imaging and targeting. Curr Pharm Des. 2006;12:2723–2747. doi: 10.2174/138161206777947740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Park K, Kim YS, Lee GY, Park RW, Kim IS, Kim SY, Byun Y. Tumor endothelial cell targeted cyclic RGD-modified heparin derivative: inhibition of angiogenesis and tumor growth. Pharm Res. 2008;25:2786–2798. doi: 10.1007/s11095-008-9643-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Carlson CB, Mowery P, Owen RM, Dykhuizen EC, Kiessling LL. Selective tumor cell targeting using low-affinity, multivalent interactions. ACS Chem Biol. 2007;2:119–127. doi: 10.1021/cb6003788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Owen RM, Carlson CB, Xu J, Mowery P, Fasella E, Kiessling LL. Bifunctional ligands that target cells displaying the alpha v beta3 integrin. Chembiochem. 2007;8:68–82. doi: 10.1002/cbic.200600339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wang W, Borchardt RT, Wang B. Orally active peptidomimetic RGD analogs that are glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists. Curr Med Chem. 2000;7:437–453. doi: 10.2174/0929867003375074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gyorgydeak Z, Szilagyi L, Paulsen H. Synthesis, structure, and reactions of glycosyl azide. J Carbohyd Chem. 1993;12:139–163. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Inazu T, Kobayashi K. A new method for the synthesis of Nα-Fmoc-Nβ-glycosylated-L-asparagine derivatives. Synlett. 1993:869–870. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Aich U, Loganathan D. Synthesis of N-(beta-glycopyranosyl)azidoacetamides. J Carbohyd Chem. 2005;24:1–12. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Tornoe CW, Christensen C, Meldal M. Peptidotriazoles on solid phase: [1,2,3]-triazoles by regiospecific copper(i)-catalyzed 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions of terminal alkynes to azides. J Org Chem. 2002;67:3057–3064. doi: 10.1021/jo011148j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Meldal M, Tornoe CW. Cu-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition. Chem Rev. 2008;108:2952–3015. doi: 10.1021/cr0783479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bertozzi CR, Kiessling LL. Chemical glycobiology. Science. 2001;291:2357–2364. doi: 10.1126/science.1059820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lindahl U, Roden L. The Role of Galactose and Xylose in the Linkage of Heparin to Protein. J Biol Chem. 1965;240:2821–2826. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sugahara K. The carbohydrate-protein linkage region of proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycan biosynthesis. Seikagaku. 1989;61:496–500. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kitagawa H, Oyama M, Masayama K, Yamaguchi Y, Sugahara K. Structural variations in the glycosaminoglycan-protein linkage region of recombinant decorin expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Glycobiology. 1997;7:1175–1180. doi: 10.1093/glycob/7.8.1175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kitagawa H, Tone Y, Tamura J, Neumann KW, Ogawa T, Oka S, Kawasaki T, Sugahara K. Molecular cloning and expression of glucuronyltransferase I involved in the biosynthesis of the glycosaminoglycan-protein linkage region of proteoglycans. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:6615–6618. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.12.6615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Gulberti S, Lattard V, Fondeur M, Jacquinet JC, Mulliert G, Netter P, Magdalou J, Ouzzine M, Fournel-Gigleux S. Phosphorylation and sulfation of oligosaccharide substrates critically influence the activity of human beta1,4-galactosyltransferase 7 (GalT-I) and beta1,3-glucuronosyltransferase I (GlcAT-I) involved in the biosynthesis of the glycosaminoglycan-protein linkage region of proteoglycans. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:1417–1425. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M411552200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Esko JD, Stewart TE, Taylor WH. Animal cell mutants defective in glycosaminoglycan biosynthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985;82:3197–3201. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.10.3197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Pfaff M, Tangemann K, Muller B, Gurrath M, Muller G, Kessler H, Timpl R, Engel J. Selective recognition of cyclic RGD peptides of NMR defined conformation by alpha IIb beta 3, alpha V beta 3, and alpha 5 beta 1 integrins. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:20233–20238. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kaufmann D, Fiedler A, Junger A, Auernheimer J, Kessler H, Weberskirch R. Chemical conjugation of linear and cyclic RGD moieties to a recombinant elastin-mimetic polypeptide--a versatile approach towards bioactive protein hydrogels. Macromol Biosci. 2008;8:577–588. doi: 10.1002/mabi.200700234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]