Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
letter
. 2010 Aug 16;54(11):4948–4949. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00415-10

Frequency of Spontaneous Resistance to Fosfomycin Combined with Different Antibiotics in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Alexandro Rodríguez-Rojas 1,*, Alejandro Couce 1, Jesús Blázquez* 1,*
PMCID: PMC2976149  PMID: 20713658

Chronic infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa are probably the most recurrent clinical situation where antibiotic treatment fails (5). The presence of hypermutable strains exacerbates this phenomenon and appears to be an important factor for the development of multiple-antimicrobial resistance (6, 8). The shortage of new antimicrobials led to reconsideration of old antibiotics, including fosfomycin, as appealing alternatives for treatments (2). The good effectiveness of fosfomycin combined with other antibiotics has been reported (2, 3, 7, 9, 11, 15). However, P. aeruginosa has a very high mutant frequency for fosfomycin resistance in vitro (12) and in vivo (13), suggesting an elevated risk of resistance to combined treatments.

We analyzed the frequency of mutants resistant to fosfomycin in combination with other antimicrobials currently used in P. aeruginosa infections, including tobramycin, amikacin, imipenem, meropenem, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, and colistin. PA14 and its hypermutable mutS::MAR2xT7 derivative (4) were used as model strains. Experiments were performed in quintuplicate in all cases as described previously (12). Antibiotic concentrations were chosen according to each drug clinical breakpoint, as established by EUCAST (www.eucast.org/clinical_breakpoints/), except for fosfomycin, which was used at 128 μg/ml to avoid the background on plates (no significant differences were found in mutant frequencies at 32, 64, and 128 μg/ml [not shown]).

The mutant frequencies of PA14 for individual antibiotics were very high for fosfomycin, high for imipenem and meropenem, moderate for ceftazidime, and relatively low for ciprofloxacin, tobramycin, and amikacin (Table 1). The frequencies of the hypermutable strain were, as expected, 100- to 1,000-fold higher. However, the mutant frequencies of the wild-type (WT) strain for the combinations were below the limit of detection (<1 × 10−10) for all antibiotics, except for imipenem plus fosfomycin (1.1 × 10−9). For the hypermutable strain, the mutant frequencies for combinations of fosfomycin with tobramycin, amikacin, meropenem, ciprofloxacin, and colistin were below the limit of detection. However, combinations with ceftazidime or imipenem yielded a higher-than-expected number of mutants resistant to both antibiotics (higher than the product of the frequencies for each single antibiotic), with values of 1.0 × 10−8 and 1.1 × 10−7, respectively. These interesting results remain to be explained, although antagonism between fosfomycin and these antibiotics in vitro could not be demonstrated (data not shown). These results suggest that the combinations of fosfomycin with ceftazidime or imipenem are less appropriate, in terms of probability of mutant occurrence, than those with tobramycin or ciprofloxacin.

TABLE 1.

Frequency of mutants of P. aeruginosa PA14 and its hypermutable mutS derivative resistant to single antibiotics and their combinations with fosfomycin

Antibiotic(s) MICa (μg/ml) Concnb (μg/ml) Mutant frequency
WT mutS
Fosfomycin 8 128 2.3 × 10−6 2.1 × 10−4
Tobramycin 1 4 2.2 × 10−9 1.4 × 10−7
Amikacin 1 16 2.6 × 10−9 1.2 × 10−7
Imipenem 0.5 8 1.5 × 10−7 1.6 × 10−5
Meropenem 0.25 8 4.2 × 10−8 1.3 × 10−6
Ceftazidime 1 8 1.3 × 10−8 1.3 × 10−6
Ciprofloxacin 0.1 1 1.1 × 10−9 9.0 × 10−7
Colistin 0.5 2 <1.0 × 10−10 <1.0 × 10−10
Tobramycin + fosfomycin 4 + 128 <1.0 × 10−10 <1.0 × 10−10
Amikacin + fosfomycin 16 + 128 <1.0 × 10−10 <1.0 × 10−10
Imipenem + fosfomycin 8 + 128 1.1 × 10−9 1.1 × 10−7
Meropenem + fosfomycin 8 + 128 <1.0 × 10−10 <1.0 × 10−10
Ceftazidime + fosfomycin 8 + 128 <1.0 × 10−10 1.0 × 10−8
Ciprofloxacin + fosfomycin 1 + 128 <1.0 × 10−10 <1.0 × 10−10
Colistin + fosfomycin 2 + 128 <1.0 × 10−10 <1.0 × 10−10
a

The MICs for PA14 (WT) and its mutS derivative were identical in all cases. For all antibiotics, the MIC was determined as recommended by the CLSI (1).

b

Final concentration used for calculation of mutant frequency.

In cases of chronic infection, such as that involving cystic fibrosis, the bacterial load of P. aeruginosa can be as high as 107 to 109 CFU per ml of mucus secretion (14), with a high frequency of hypermutable strains (10). According to our results, the probability of finding mutants resistant to the combination of fosfomycin with ceftazidime or imipenem is dangerously high.

Antibiotic combinations must be carefully considered to minimize the selection of strains with double resistance. Further studies on combinations need to be done considering different criteria, including pharmacological activity and the possibility of emergence of resistant mutants.

Acknowledgments

We thank A. Oliver for useful comments and F. Ausubel for the P. aeruginosa strains.

This work was supported by the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (cofinanced by the European Development Regional Fund “A Way To Achieve Europe” ERDF), Spanish Network for the Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI RD06/0008), the grant PI070215 (FIS-ISCIII), and the PAR project (Ref 241476) from the EU 7th Framework Programme.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 16 August 2010.

REFERENCES

  • 1.CLSI. 2006. CLSI methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. Approved standard, 7th ed. CLSI M7-A7. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
  • 2.Falagas, M. E., A. P. Grammatikos, and A. Michalopoulos. 2008. Potential of old-generation antibiotics to address current need for new antibiotics. Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 6:593-600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Faruqi, S., J. McCreanor, T. Moon, R. Meigh, and A. H. Morice. 2008. Fosfomycin for Pseudomonas-related exacerbations of cystic fibrosis. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 32:461-463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Liberati, N. T., J. M. Urbach, S. Miyata, D. G. Lee, E. Drenkard, G. Wu, J. Villanueva, T. Wei, and F. M. Ausubel. 2006. An ordered, nonredundant library of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PA14 transposon insertion mutants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103:2833-2838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Livermore, D. M. 2002. Multiple mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: our worst nightmare? Clin. Infect. Dis. 34:634-640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Macia, M. D., D. Blanquer, B. Togores, J. Sauleda, J. L. Perez, and A. Oliver. 2005. Hypermutation is a key factor in development of multiple-antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains causing chronic lung infections. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:3382-3386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.MacLeod, D. L., L. M. Barker, J. L. Sutherland, S. C. Moss, J. L. Gurgel, T. F. Kenney, J. L. Burns, and W. R. Baker. 2009. Antibacterial activities of a fosfomycin/tobramycin combination: a novel inhaled antibiotic for bronchiectasis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 64:829-836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mena, A., E. E. Smith, J. L. Burns, D. P. Speert, S. M. Moskowitz, J. L. Perez, and A. Oliver. 2008. Genetic adaptation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to the airways of cystic fibrosis patients is catalyzed by hypermutation. J. Bacteriol. 190:7910-7917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mikuniya, T., Y. Kato, T. Ida, K. Maebashi, K. Monden, R. Kariyama, and H. Kumon. 2007. Treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms with a combination of fluoroquinolones and fosfomycin in a rat urinary tract infection model. J. Infect. Chemother. 13:285-290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Oliver, A., R. Canton, P. Campo, F. Baquero, and J. Blazquez. 2000. High frequency of hypermutable Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis lung infection. Science 288:1251-1254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pruekprasert, P., and W. Tunyapanit. 2005. In vitro activity of fosfomycin-gentamicin, fosfomycin-ceftazidime, fosfomycin-imipenem and ceftazidime-gentamicin combinations against ceftazidime-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 36:1239-1242. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rodriguez-Rojas, A., and J. Blazquez. 2009. The Pseudomonas aeruginosa pfpI gene plays an antimutator role and provides general stress protection. J. Bacteriol. 191:844-850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rodriguez-Rojas, A., M. D. Macia, A. Couce, C. Gomez, A. Castaneda-Garcia, A. Oliver, and J. Blazquez. 2010. Assessing the emergence of resistance: the absence of biological cost in vivo may compromise fosfomycin treatments for P. aeruginosa infections. PLoS One 5:e10193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tummler, B., J. Bosshammer, S. Breitenstein, I. Brockhausen, P. Gudowius, C. Herrmann, S. Herrmann, T. Heuer, P. Kubesch, F. Mekus, U. Romling, K. D. Schmidt, C. Spangenberg, and S. Walter. 1997. Infections with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in patients with cystic fibrosis. Behring Inst. Mitt. 98:249-255. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yamada, S., Y. Hyo, S. Ohmori, and M. Ohuchi. 2007. Role of ciprofloxacin in its synergistic effect with fosfomycin on drug-resistant strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Chemotherapy 53:202-209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES