Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2009 Jul 15;65(Pt 8):m921. doi: 10.1107/S1600536809026804

catena-Poly[bis­(4-amino­pyridinium) [[diaqua­manganese(II)]-di-μ-chlorido] dichloride]

Donia Zaouali Zgolli a, Habib Boughzala a,*, Ahmed Driss a
PMCID: PMC2977461  PMID: 21583377

Abstract

Single crystals of the title organic–inorganic hybrid, {(C5H7N2)2[MnCl2(H2O)2]Cl2}n, were synthesized from an ethanol solution containing manganese(II) chloride tetra­hydrate and 4-amino­pyridine under acidic conditions. The asymmetric unit contains a disordered organic cation (occupancies in the ratio 0.72:0.28), a chloride anion and an MnCl(H2O) moiety with the MnII atom located on an inversion center. The structure is built up of infinite chains of edge-sharing [MnCl4(H2O)2] octa­hedra developing parallel to the a axis which are separated by the 4-amino­pyridinium ions and discrete chloride ions. The organic cations occupy the empty space around each inorganic chain. Structural cohesion is organized through N—H⋯Cl and O—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds, which build up a three-dimensional network.

Related literature

For general background to organic–inorganic hybride materials, see: Lacroix et al. (1994); Mitzi (2001); Calabrese et al. (1991); Hong et al. (1992). For related structures, see: Caputo et al. (1976); Hachuła et al. (2009); Zeng et al. (2008).graphic file with name e-65-0m921-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • (C5H7N2)2[MnCl2(H2O)2]Cl2

  • M r = 421.01

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 3.946 (1) Å

  • b = 17.586 (6) Å

  • c = 12.845 (4) Å

  • β = 93.48 (3)°

  • V = 889.7 (5) Å3

  • Z = 2

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 1.35 mm−1

  • T = 298 K

  • 0.05 × 0.04 × 0.02 mm

Data collection

  • Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968) T min = 0.916, T max = 0.999

  • 2516 measured reflections

  • 1892 independent reflections

  • 1473 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.017

  • 2 standard reflections frequency: 120 min intensity decay: 1%

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.036

  • wR(F 2) = 0.095

  • S = 1.04

  • 1892 reflections

  • 112 parameters

  • 43 restraints

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.38 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.45 e Å−3

Data collection: CAD-4 EXPRESS (Duisenberg, 1992; Macíček & Yordanov, 1992); cell refinement: CAD-4 EXPRESS; data reduction: XCAD4 (Harms & Wocadlo, 1995); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2009) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2006); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809026804/dn2460sup1.cif

e-65-0m921-sup1.cif (17.3KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809026804/dn2460Isup2.hkl

e-65-0m921-Isup2.hkl (91.2KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O1—HW1⋯Cl1i 0.87 2.27 3.090 (2) 158
O1—HW2⋯Cl1ii 0.73 2.39 3.082 (2) 159
N1—H1A⋯Cl1 0.86 2.41 3.264 (4) 172
N1—H1B⋯Cl2 0.86 2.57 3.415 (4) 169
N1′—H1′1⋯Cl1iii 0.86 2.47 3.299 (10) 163
N1′—H1′2⋯Cl1i 0.86 2.58 3.386 (9) 156

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic; (iii) Inline graphic.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

Studies of organic-inorganic hybrid compounds continue to be a focus area in chemistry and material science because they combine properties of organic and inorganic compounds within one single molecular scale, such as second order nonlinear optical (NLO) response, magnetism, luminescence, and even multifunctional properties (Mitzi et al. (2001); Lacroix et al. (1994)).

This kind of materials, generally expressed as (R—NH3)2-MX4 or (NH3– R—NH3) MX4 (where R: organic group, M: divalent metal and X: halogen) can be regarded as semiconductor/insulator multiple quantum well system consisting of metal halide semiconductor layers sandwiched between organic ammonium insulator layers (Calabrese et al. (1991); Hong et al. (1992). In this paper, we report the synthesis and single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies of the organic-inorganic hybrid compound: [MnCl2(H2O)2].(C5H8N2)2.Cl2.

The assymetric unit is built up from a MnCl(H2O) moiety, a fully disordered 4-ammoniumpyridine and a Cl ion. The Mn atom is located on an inversion center and each managanese atom is octahedrally coordinated to four equatorial chlorine atoms and to two oxygen atoms in axial positions (Fig. 1).

The [MnCl2(H2O)2].(C5H8N2)2.Cl2 structure is built up of infinite edges sharing octahedra MnCl4(H2O)2 chains running along the [100] direction. Similar arrangement of the inorganic part was reported for [(CH3)3NH]MnCl3. 2H2O published by Caputo et al. (1976). The organic-inorganic cohesion is ensured by hydrogen bonding that involves two kinds of interactions: N1—H1A···Cl1 and N1—H1B···Cl2 bonds between the organic cation and the chloride and O—HW1···Cl1 and O—HW2···Cl1 between the water molecule and the Cl anion (Fig. 2, Table 1). It is worthy to note that the second kind of hydrogene bonds are stronger than the first one.

The [C5H8N2]+cations is disordered over two positions which are rotated with respect to each other by about 141°. Thus, the amine group of one component lies close to the carbon atom C1 of the other component so that both components are more or less coplanar one to another (Fig. 3).

The distances and angles througout the structure are in good agreement with those encountered in several compounds of literature (Zeng et al. (2008); Hachuła et al. (2009)).

Experimental

An aqueous HCl (1M) solution, 4-aminopyridine (C5H6N2) and manganese dichloride tetrahydrate (MnCl2.4H2O) in a 2:1:1 molar ratio were mixed and dissolved in sufficient ethanol. Crystal for X-Ray diffraction structural analysis were grown by slow evaporation at room temperature and then set aside for few days to obtain colourless crystals.

Refinement

All H atoms attached to C atoms and N atom were fixed geometrically and treated as riding with C—H = 0.93 Å and N—H = 0.86 Å with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C or N). H atoms of water molecule were located in difference Fourier maps and included in the subsequent refinement using restraints (O—H= 0.82 (1)Å and H···.H= 1.39 (2) Å) with Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(O). In the last stage of refinement, they were treated as as riding on the O atom.

The organic cation is disordered over two positions twisted to each other by about 141° around an axis perpendicular to their mean planes. The two components were refined using the tools available in SHELXL97(Sheldrick, 2008): PART, SAME and EADP. In the first step of refinement the occupancy factor for each domain has been determined to be in the ration 0.72/0.28 by using the FREE variable option.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Representation of the assymetric unit with the atom labelling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. H atoms ahve been omitted for clarity. [Symmetry codes: (i) -x + 1, -y + 1, -z + 2; (ii) -x, -y + 1, -z + 2; (iii) x + 1, y, z; (iv) x - 1, y, z]

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Partial packing view showing the hydrogen bond interactions between the inorganic and organic molecules. Ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Representation of the disordrered components of the organic cation

Crystal data

(C5H7N2)2[MnCl2(H2O)2]Cl2 F(000) = 426
Mr = 421.01 Dx = 1.572 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/c Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc Cell parameters from 25 reflections
a = 3.946 (1) Å θ = 10–15°
b = 17.586 (6) Å µ = 1.35 mm1
c = 12.845 (4) Å T = 298 K
β = 93.48 (3)° Prism, colourless
V = 889.7 (5) Å3 0.05 × 0.04 × 0.02 mm
Z = 2

Data collection

Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer 1473 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube Rint = 0.017
graphite θmax = 27.0°, θmin = 2.3°
non–profiled ω/2θ scans h = −5→1
Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968) k = 0→22
Tmin = 0.916, Tmax = 0.999 l = −16→16
2516 measured reflections 2 standard reflections every 120 min
1892 independent reflections intensity decay: 1%

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.036 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.095 H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.04 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0506P)2 + 0.1303P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1892 reflections (Δ/σ)max = 0.001
112 parameters Δρmax = 0.38 e Å3
43 restraints Δρmin = −0.45 e Å3

Special details

Experimental. Refinement of F^2^ against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F^2^, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F^2^. The threshold expression of F^2^ > 2sigma(F^2^) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F^2^ are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R– factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq Occ. (<1)
Mn1 0.5000 0.5000 1.0000 0.03113 (15)
Cl1 0.05805 (18) 0.09651 (5) 0.82588 (5) 0.0535 (2)
Cl2 −0.01007 (15) 0.40847 (3) 0.95374 (5) 0.03833 (17)
O1 0.4739 (4) 0.54280 (11) 0.84390 (13) 0.0451 (5)
HW1 0.6426 0.5601 0.8110 0.068*
HW2 0.3186 0.5559 0.8160 0.068*
N1 0.2765 (11) 0.2731 (2) 0.7899 (3) 0.0640 (10) 0.72
H1A 0.2411 0.2253 0.7984 0.077* 0.72
H1B 0.2264 0.3050 0.8374 0.077* 0.72
N2 0.6831 (9) 0.3534 (2) 0.5246 (3) 0.0569 (9) 0.72
C1 0.4091 (13) 0.2978 (3) 0.7031 (3) 0.0501 (6) 0.72
C2 0.4949 (15) 0.2487 (3) 0.6239 (4) 0.0501 (6) 0.72
H2 0.4608 0.1966 0.6298 0.060* 0.72
C3 0.6292 (14) 0.2782 (3) 0.5378 (4) 0.0501 (6) 0.72
H3 0.6869 0.2451 0.4853 0.060* 0.72
C4 0.6020 (12) 0.4012 (3) 0.6012 (3) 0.0501 (6) 0.72
H4 0.6453 0.4528 0.5937 0.060* 0.72
C5 0.4562 (16) 0.3764 (4) 0.6909 (5) 0.0501 (6) 0.72
H5 0.3920 0.4107 0.7412 0.060* 0.72
N1' 0.704 (3) 0.4342 (5) 0.5481 (7) 0.060 (3) 0.28
H1'1 0.7695 0.4343 0.4855 0.072* 0.28
H1'2 0.6962 0.4761 0.5824 0.072* 0.28
N2' 0.400 (2) 0.2381 (5) 0.6940 (6) 0.049 (2) 0.28
C1' 0.614 (3) 0.3697 (5) 0.5917 (8) 0.0483 (15) 0.28
C2' 0.619 (4) 0.3023 (5) 0.5432 (10) 0.0483 (15) 0.28
H2' 0.6893 0.2985 0.4756 0.058* 0.28
C3' 0.517 (4) 0.2379 (6) 0.5971 (8) 0.0483 (15) 0.28
H3' 0.5299 0.1912 0.5635 0.058* 0.28
C4' 0.377 (3) 0.3078 (5) 0.7366 (9) 0.0483 (15) 0.28
H4' 0.2683 0.3122 0.7986 0.058* 0.28
C5' 0.507 (4) 0.3743 (10) 0.6929 (12) 0.0483 (15) 0.28
H5' 0.5207 0.4197 0.7301 0.058* 0.28

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Mn1 0.0294 (3) 0.0381 (3) 0.0263 (2) 0.0004 (2) 0.00499 (18) 0.00265 (19)
Cl1 0.0426 (4) 0.0783 (5) 0.0402 (3) −0.0008 (3) 0.0075 (3) −0.0189 (3)
Cl2 0.0326 (3) 0.0375 (3) 0.0455 (3) 0.0002 (2) 0.0071 (2) −0.0063 (2)
O1 0.0335 (9) 0.0706 (13) 0.0317 (9) 0.0022 (9) 0.0050 (7) 0.0172 (8)
N1 0.086 (3) 0.061 (2) 0.0471 (19) −0.003 (2) 0.0207 (19) 0.0011 (17)
N2 0.051 (2) 0.078 (3) 0.0413 (19) 0.0024 (19) 0.0022 (16) 0.0057 (18)
C1 0.0557 (14) 0.0510 (11) 0.0435 (11) 0.0032 (12) 0.0032 (10) −0.0060 (10)
C2 0.0557 (14) 0.0510 (11) 0.0435 (11) 0.0032 (12) 0.0032 (10) −0.0060 (10)
C3 0.0557 (14) 0.0510 (11) 0.0435 (11) 0.0032 (12) 0.0032 (10) −0.0060 (10)
C4 0.0557 (14) 0.0510 (11) 0.0435 (11) 0.0032 (12) 0.0032 (10) −0.0060 (10)
C5 0.0557 (14) 0.0510 (11) 0.0435 (11) 0.0032 (12) 0.0032 (10) −0.0060 (10)
N1' 0.094 (8) 0.049 (5) 0.038 (4) −0.017 (5) 0.002 (5) −0.003 (4)
N2' 0.052 (5) 0.050 (5) 0.045 (5) 0.000 (4) 0.005 (4) −0.004 (4)
C1' 0.052 (3) 0.040 (3) 0.052 (3) 0.008 (2) −0.002 (3) −0.018 (3)
C2' 0.052 (3) 0.040 (3) 0.052 (3) 0.008 (2) −0.002 (3) −0.018 (3)
C3' 0.052 (3) 0.040 (3) 0.052 (3) 0.008 (2) −0.002 (3) −0.018 (3)
C4' 0.052 (3) 0.040 (3) 0.052 (3) 0.008 (2) −0.002 (3) −0.018 (3)
C5' 0.052 (3) 0.040 (3) 0.052 (3) 0.008 (2) −0.002 (3) −0.018 (3)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

Mn1—O1i 2.1383 (17) C3—H3 0.9300
Mn1—O1 2.1383 (17) C4—C5 1.389 (7)
Mn1—Cl2ii 2.6117 (8) C4—H4 0.9300
Mn1—Cl2iii 2.6117 (8) C5—H5 0.9300
Mn1—Cl2 2.6173 (8) N1'—C1' 1.323 (11)
Mn1—Cl2i 2.6173 (8) N1'—H1'1 0.8600
Cl2—Mn1iv 2.6117 (8) N1'—H1'2 0.8600
O1—HW1 0.8654 N2'—C4' 1.348 (10)
O1—HW2 0.7285 N2'—C3' 1.353 (10)
N1—C1 1.332 (5) C1'—C2' 1.339 (11)
N1—H1A 0.8600 C1'—C5' 1.393 (13)
N1—H1B 0.8600 C2'—C3' 1.400 (12)
N2—C4 1.348 (5) C2'—H2' 0.9300
N2—C3 1.351 (6) C3'—H3' 0.9300
C1—C2 1.392 (6) C4'—C5' 1.408 (13)
C1—C5 1.405 (8) C4'—H4' 0.9300
C2—C3 1.359 (6) C5'—H5' 0.9300
C2—H2 0.9300
O1i—Mn1—O1 180.000 (1) N2—C3—C2 123.2 (4)
O1i—Mn1—Cl2ii 90.13 (6) N2—C3—H3 118.4
O1—Mn1—Cl2ii 89.87 (6) C2—C3—H3 118.4
O1i—Mn1—Cl2iii 89.87 (6) N2—C4—C5 122.6 (5)
O1—Mn1—Cl2iii 90.13 (6) N2—C4—H4 118.7
Cl2ii—Mn1—Cl2iii 180.0 C5—C4—H4 118.7
O1i—Mn1—Cl2 89.37 (6) C4—C5—C1 117.8 (6)
O1—Mn1—Cl2 90.63 (6) C4—C5—H5 121.1
Cl2ii—Mn1—Cl2 97.99 (3) C1—C5—H5 121.1
Cl2iii—Mn1—Cl2 82.01 (3) C1'—N1'—H1'1 120.0
O1i—Mn1—Cl2i 90.63 (6) C1'—N1'—H1'2 120.0
O1—Mn1—Cl2i 89.37 (6) H1'1—N1'—H1'2 120.0
Cl2ii—Mn1—Cl2i 82.01 (3) C4'—N2'—C3' 114.4 (10)
Cl2iii—Mn1—Cl2i 97.99 (3) N1'—C1'—C2' 123.4 (12)
Cl2—Mn1—Cl2i 180.00 (2) N1'—C1'—C5' 116.6 (10)
Mn1iv—Cl2—Mn1 97.99 (3) C2'—C1'—C5' 120.0 (13)
Mn1—O1—HW1 126.0 C1'—C2'—C3' 118.3 (12)
Mn1—O1—HW2 124.3 C1'—C2'—H2' 120.9
HW1—O1—HW2 107.3 C3'—C2'—H2' 120.9
C1—N1—H1A 120.0 N2'—C3'—C2' 125.2 (10)
C1—N1—H1B 120.0 N2'—C3'—H3' 117.4
H1A—N1—H1B 120.0 C2'—C3'—H3' 117.4
C4—N2—C3 118.2 (4) N2'—C4'—C5' 123.9 (13)
N1—C1—C2 122.3 (5) N2'—C4'—H4' 118.0
N1—C1—C5 118.4 (5) C5'—C4'—H4' 118.0
C2—C1—C5 119.3 (5) C1'—C5'—C4' 117.5 (14)
C3—C2—C1 118.8 (5) C1'—C5'—H5' 121.3
C3—C2—H2 120.6 C4'—C5'—H5' 121.3
C1—C2—H2 120.6

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z+2; (ii) x+1, y, z; (iii) −x, −y+1, −z+2; (iv) x−1, y, z.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
O1—HW1···Cl1v 0.87 2.27 3.090 (2) 158
O1—HW2···Cl1vi 0.73 2.39 3.082 (2) 159
N1—H1A···Cl1 0.86 2.41 3.264 (4) 172
N1—H1B···Cl2 0.86 2.57 3.415 (4) 169
N1'—H1'1···Cl1vii 0.86 2.47 3.299 (10) 163
N1'—H1'2···Cl1v 0.86 2.58 3.386 (9) 156

Symmetry codes: (v) −x+1, y+1/2, −z+3/2; (vi) −x, y+1/2, −z+3/2; (vii) x+1, −y+1/2, z−1/2.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: DN2460).

References

  1. Brandenburg, K. (2006). DIAMOND Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.
  2. Calabrese, J., Jones, N. L., Harlow, R. L., Herron, N., Thorn, D. L. & Wang, Y. (1991). J. Am. Chem. Soc.113, 2328–2330.
  3. Caputo, R. E., Willett, R. D. & Muir, J. A. (1976). Acta Cryst. B32, 2639–2642.
  4. Duisenberg, A. J. M. (1992). J. Appl. Cryst.25, 92–96.
  5. Farrugia, L. J. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst.32, 837–838.
  6. Hachuła, B., Pędras, M., Pentak, D., Nowak, M., Kusz, J. & Borek, J. (2009). Acta Cryst. C65, m215–m218. [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. Harms, K. & Wocadlo, S. (1995). XCAD4 University of Marburg, Germany.
  8. Hong, X., Ishihara, T. & Nurmikko, A. V. (1992). Solid State Commun.84, 657–661.
  9. Lacroix, P. G., Clément, R., Nakatani, K., Delaire, J. A., Zyss, J. & Ledoux, I. (1994). Science, 263, 658–660. [DOI] [PubMed]
  10. Macíček, J. & Yordanov, A. (1992). J. Appl. Cryst.25, 73–80.
  11. Mitzi, D. B. (2001). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 1–12.
  12. North, A. C. T., Phillips, D. C. & Mathews, F. S. (1968). Acta Cryst. A24, 351–359.
  13. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  14. Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  15. Zeng, J.-Z., Yi, X.-G., Lin, J.-Y., Ying, S.-M. & Huang, G.-S. (2008). Acta Cryst. E64, m476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809026804/dn2460sup1.cif

e-65-0m921-sup1.cif (17.3KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809026804/dn2460Isup2.hkl

e-65-0m921-Isup2.hkl (91.2KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES