Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2009 Jul 25;65(Pt 8):o1981. doi: 10.1107/S1600536809027822

N-[(E)-Quinoxalin-2-ylmethyl­idene]-1H-indazol-5-amine

P Leeju a, V Arun a, Manju Sebastian a, G Varsha a, Digna Varghese a, K K M Yusuff a,*
PMCID: PMC2977485  PMID: 21583657

Abstract

In the title mol­ecule, C16H11N5, the mean planes of the quinoxaline and indazole fragments form a dihedral angle of 10.62 (5)°. In the crystal, weak inter­molecular N—H⋯N hydrogen bonds link the mol­ecules into zigzag chains extending in the [001] direction. The crystal packing also exhibits π–π inter­actions [centroid–centroid distances of 3.7080 (2) and 3.8220 (5) Å], which form stacks of the mol­ecules parallel to the a axis.

Related literature

For related structures, see: Varghese et al. (2009); Varsha et al. (2009).graphic file with name e-65-o1981-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • C16H11N5

  • M r = 273.30

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 7.7015 (6) Å

  • b = 8.0330 (6) Å

  • c = 20.6034 (16) Å

  • β = 96.882 (2)°

  • V = 1265.47 (17) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.09 mm−1

  • T = 298 K

  • 0.45 × 0.27 × 0.08 mm

Data collection

  • Bruker Kappa APEX CCD diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2001) T min = 0.960, T max = 0.993

  • 16012 measured reflections

  • 3597 independent reflections

  • 2502 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.024

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.046

  • wR(F 2) = 0.143

  • S = 1.03

  • 3597 reflections

  • 190 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.23 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.26 e Å−3

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2000); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2000); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2009).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global, schiflm. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809027822/cv2578sup1.cif

e-65-o1981-sup1.cif (16.5KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809027822/cv2578Isup2.hkl

e-65-o1981-Isup2.hkl (172.8KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N4—H4⋯N1iii 0.86 2.31 3.1050 (15) 153

Symmetry code: (iii) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

The X-ray data were collected on the diffractometer facilities at the Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, provided by the Department of Science and Technology. MS thanks the Kerala State Council for Science, Technology and the Environment, Trivandrum, Kerala, for support. DV acknowledges the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), India, for financial assistance.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

In view of synthesizing new quinoxaline based Schiff bases, we have undertaken the synthesis of the title compound, (1), and report here its crystal structure. In (1), the quinoxaline ring and indazole ring are each approximately planar, with the maximum deviations of 0.0254 (4) and 0.0213 (4) Å from the least square planes, respectively. A perspective drawing is depicted in figure 1 with the atomic numbering scheme. The compound is non-planar due to the twisting of rings with respect to azomethine group. Bond lengths and angles are in normal ranges and comparable to those in related structures (Varghese et al., 2009; Varsha et al., 2009). In the crystal structure, molecules are held together by π–π stacking interactions and N—H···N intermolecular hydrogen bonding.

Experimental

A hot solution of 5-aminoindazole (1 mmol) in ethanol (20 ml) was added slowly to a hot solution of quinoxaline-2-carboxaldehyde (1 mmol) in the same solvent (40 ml).The resulting mixture on cooling yielded the crude product of (1). Pale green crystals suitable for single-crystal XRD are obtained by slow evaporation of ethanolic solution of (1).

Refinement

H atoms were positioned geometrically (N—H = 0.86 Å, C—H = 0.93 Å) and refined in riding mode, with Uiso (H) = 1.2Ueq(C, N).

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The molecular structure of (I), showing the atom-numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level.

Crystal data

C16H11N5 F(000) = 568
Mr = 273.30 Dx = 1.434 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/c Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc Cell parameters from 2502 reflections
a = 7.7015 (6) Å θ = 2.6–29.8°
b = 8.0330 (6) Å µ = 0.09 mm1
c = 20.6034 (16) Å T = 298 K
β = 96.882 (2)° Plate, green
V = 1265.47 (17) Å3 0.45 × 0.27 × 0.08 mm
Z = 4

Data collection

Bruker Kappa APEX CCD diffractometer 3597 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 2502 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphite Rint = 0.024
ω and φ scans θmax = 29.8°, θmin = 2.7°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2001) h = −10→10
Tmin = 0.960, Tmax = 0.993 k = −11→10
16012 measured reflections l = −28→26

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.046 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.143 H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.03 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0715P)2 + 0.2171P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
3597 reflections (Δ/σ)max = 0.003
190 parameters Δρmax = 0.23 e Å3
0 restraints Δρmin = −0.26 e Å3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
N1 0.25032 (15) 0.66502 (15) 0.33833 (5) 0.0436 (3)
N2 0.14194 (13) 0.77204 (14) 0.45776 (5) 0.0392 (3)
N3 0.30313 (15) 0.37642 (14) 0.50779 (5) 0.0413 (3)
N4 0.38605 (15) −0.08636 (16) 0.70573 (5) 0.0454 (3)
H4 0.3774 −0.0851 0.7470 0.054*
N5 0.42455 (17) −0.22452 (16) 0.67229 (6) 0.0515 (3)
C1 0.18211 (15) 0.82051 (17) 0.34459 (6) 0.0368 (3)
C2 0.16182 (18) 0.9289 (2) 0.29041 (6) 0.0469 (3)
H2 0.1980 0.8960 0.2509 0.056*
C3 0.08916 (19) 1.0817 (2) 0.29612 (7) 0.0507 (4)
H3 0.0724 1.1511 0.2598 0.061*
C4 0.03910 (19) 1.1364 (2) 0.35576 (7) 0.0490 (4)
H4A −0.0073 1.2426 0.3589 0.059*
C5 0.05790 (18) 1.03530 (18) 0.40912 (7) 0.0440 (3)
H5 0.0247 1.0724 0.4486 0.053*
C6 0.12780 (16) 0.87452 (17) 0.40443 (6) 0.0361 (3)
C7 0.26273 (18) 0.57069 (18) 0.39027 (6) 0.0436 (3)
H7 0.3088 0.4642 0.3877 0.052*
C8 0.20879 (16) 0.62367 (16) 0.45062 (6) 0.0374 (3)
C9 0.22517 (17) 0.51440 (18) 0.50816 (6) 0.0411 (3)
H9 0.1773 0.5475 0.5455 0.049*
C10 0.32246 (16) 0.27137 (17) 0.56339 (6) 0.0369 (3)
C11 0.36804 (16) 0.10932 (16) 0.55175 (6) 0.0375 (3)
H11 0.3848 0.0756 0.5098 0.045*
C12 0.38887 (16) −0.00418 (17) 0.60359 (6) 0.0360 (3)
C13 0.36273 (15) 0.04951 (17) 0.66654 (6) 0.0365 (3)
C14 0.42856 (19) −0.17552 (18) 0.61149 (6) 0.0460 (3)
H14 0.4543 −0.2451 0.5778 0.055*
C15 0.32249 (17) 0.21454 (18) 0.67939 (6) 0.0421 (3)
H15 0.3096 0.2496 0.7216 0.051*
C16 0.30258 (18) 0.32333 (18) 0.62789 (6) 0.0427 (3)
H16 0.2754 0.4339 0.6354 0.051*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
N1 0.0514 (6) 0.0477 (7) 0.0324 (5) 0.0016 (5) 0.0079 (4) −0.0037 (5)
N2 0.0438 (6) 0.0433 (6) 0.0313 (5) 0.0018 (5) 0.0081 (4) 0.0014 (4)
N3 0.0508 (6) 0.0404 (6) 0.0333 (5) −0.0004 (5) 0.0073 (4) 0.0023 (4)
N4 0.0577 (7) 0.0510 (7) 0.0279 (5) −0.0001 (5) 0.0070 (5) 0.0050 (5)
N5 0.0698 (8) 0.0469 (7) 0.0377 (6) 0.0017 (6) 0.0070 (5) 0.0050 (5)
C1 0.0357 (6) 0.0445 (7) 0.0304 (6) −0.0040 (5) 0.0046 (4) −0.0005 (5)
C2 0.0492 (7) 0.0593 (9) 0.0333 (6) −0.0023 (7) 0.0096 (5) 0.0060 (6)
C3 0.0494 (8) 0.0581 (9) 0.0453 (8) −0.0007 (7) 0.0087 (6) 0.0184 (7)
C4 0.0473 (7) 0.0466 (8) 0.0536 (8) 0.0046 (6) 0.0085 (6) 0.0093 (7)
C5 0.0465 (7) 0.0465 (8) 0.0398 (7) 0.0042 (6) 0.0087 (5) 0.0011 (6)
C6 0.0355 (6) 0.0423 (7) 0.0307 (6) −0.0030 (5) 0.0046 (4) 0.0000 (5)
C7 0.0530 (8) 0.0435 (8) 0.0347 (6) 0.0041 (6) 0.0065 (5) −0.0026 (5)
C8 0.0401 (6) 0.0402 (7) 0.0322 (6) −0.0015 (5) 0.0061 (5) 0.0006 (5)
C9 0.0452 (7) 0.0452 (8) 0.0338 (6) 0.0000 (6) 0.0087 (5) 0.0022 (5)
C10 0.0417 (6) 0.0405 (7) 0.0291 (6) −0.0015 (5) 0.0071 (5) 0.0001 (5)
C11 0.0440 (6) 0.0435 (7) 0.0264 (5) 0.0002 (5) 0.0098 (5) −0.0015 (5)
C12 0.0395 (6) 0.0406 (7) 0.0286 (6) −0.0015 (5) 0.0067 (4) −0.0007 (5)
C13 0.0367 (6) 0.0468 (8) 0.0264 (5) −0.0026 (5) 0.0054 (4) 0.0012 (5)
C14 0.0604 (8) 0.0425 (8) 0.0356 (7) 0.0029 (6) 0.0075 (6) 0.0008 (6)
C15 0.0489 (7) 0.0516 (8) 0.0265 (6) 0.0014 (6) 0.0074 (5) −0.0063 (5)
C16 0.0531 (7) 0.0420 (7) 0.0334 (6) 0.0038 (6) 0.0062 (5) −0.0063 (5)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

N1—C7 1.3053 (17) C5—C6 1.4070 (19)
N1—C1 1.3670 (17) C5—H5 0.9300
N2—C8 1.3136 (17) C7—C8 1.4225 (17)
N2—C6 1.3668 (16) C7—H7 0.9300
N3—C9 1.2610 (18) C8—C9 1.4684 (17)
N3—C10 1.4162 (16) C9—H9 0.9300
N4—C13 1.3568 (17) C10—C11 1.3768 (18)
N4—N5 1.3576 (17) C10—C16 1.4185 (17)
N4—H4 0.8600 C11—C12 1.3989 (17)
N5—C14 1.3169 (17) C11—H11 0.9300
C1—C2 1.4094 (18) C12—C13 1.4039 (16)
C1—C6 1.4167 (17) C12—C14 1.4150 (19)
C2—C3 1.360 (2) C13—C15 1.3941 (19)
C2—H2 0.9300 C14—H14 0.9300
C3—C4 1.402 (2) C15—C16 1.3691 (18)
C3—H3 0.9300 C15—H15 0.9300
C4—C5 1.3605 (19) C16—H16 0.9300
C4—H4A 0.9300
Cg1···Cg3i 3.7080 (2) Cg2···Cg3ii 3.8220 (5)
C7—N1—C1 116.38 (11) N2—C8—C7 121.92 (12)
C8—N2—C6 116.81 (10) N2—C8—C9 116.67 (11)
C9—N3—C10 121.52 (11) C7—C8—C9 121.40 (12)
C13—N4—N5 112.15 (10) N3—C9—C8 121.03 (12)
C13—N4—H4 123.9 N3—C9—H9 119.5
N5—N4—H4 123.9 C8—C9—H9 119.5
C14—N5—N4 105.65 (12) C11—C10—N3 115.26 (11)
N1—C1—C2 119.81 (11) C11—C10—C16 119.99 (12)
N1—C1—C6 121.24 (11) N3—C10—C16 124.73 (12)
C2—C1—C6 118.94 (12) C10—C11—C12 119.44 (11)
C3—C2—C1 119.78 (13) C10—C11—H11 120.3
C3—C2—H2 120.1 C12—C11—H11 120.3
C1—C2—H2 120.1 C11—C12—C13 119.28 (12)
C2—C3—C4 121.20 (13) C11—C12—C14 136.49 (12)
C2—C3—H3 119.4 C13—C12—C14 104.21 (11)
C4—C3—H3 119.4 N4—C13—C15 131.95 (11)
C5—C4—C3 120.49 (14) N4—C13—C12 106.21 (12)
C5—C4—H4A 119.8 C15—C13—C12 121.83 (12)
C3—C4—H4A 119.8 N5—C14—C12 111.77 (12)
C4—C5—C6 119.80 (13) N5—C14—H14 124.1
C4—C5—H5 120.1 C12—C14—H14 124.1
C6—C5—H5 120.1 C16—C15—C13 117.81 (11)
N2—C6—C5 119.47 (11) C16—C15—H15 121.1
N2—C6—C1 120.78 (12) C13—C15—H15 121.1
C5—C6—C1 119.75 (12) C15—C16—C10 121.58 (13)
N1—C7—C8 122.85 (13) C15—C16—H16 119.2
N1—C7—H7 118.6 C10—C16—H16 119.2
C8—C7—H7 118.6

Symmetry codes: (i) −x, −y+2, −z; (ii) −x+2, −y+2, −z+2.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
N4—H4···N1iii 0.86 2.31 3.1050 (15) 153

Symmetry codes: (iii) x, −y+1/2, z+1/2.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: CV2578).

References

  1. Bruker (2000). SMART and SAINT Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  2. Sheldrick, G. M. (2001). SADABS. University of Göttingen, Germany.
  3. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  4. Varghese, D., Arun, V., Sebastian, M., Leeju, P., Varsha, G. & Yusuff, K. K. M. (2009). Acta Cryst. E65, o435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  5. Varsha, G., Arun, V., Sebastian, M., Leeju, P., Varghese, D. & Yusuff, K. K. M. (2009). Acta Cryst. E65, o919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  6. Westrip, S. P. (2009). publCIF In preparation.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global, schiflm. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809027822/cv2578sup1.cif

e-65-o1981-sup1.cif (16.5KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809027822/cv2578Isup2.hkl

e-65-o1981-Isup2.hkl (172.8KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES