Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2009 Apr 2;65(Pt 5):o952. doi: 10.1107/S1600536809011647

3,3′,5,5′-Tetra­bromo-2,2′-bithio­phene

Hongqi Li a,*, Lin Li a
PMCID: PMC2977652  PMID: 21583995

Abstract

The title compound, C8H2Br4S2, was prepared by bromination of 2,2′-bithio­phene with bromine. The mol­ecule is located on a crystallographic twofold rotation axis, thereby imposing equal geometry of the two thio­phene rings. Each five-membered ring is planar [maximum deviation 0.011 (9) Å] and the dihedral angle between the planes through the rings is 47.2 (4)°. The mol­ecules are arranged to minimize intramolecular contacts between the 3-3′ and 5-5′-bromine atoms.

Related literature

For use of the title compound as an intermediate in the synthesis of oligothiophenes and polythiophenes, see: Roncali (1997); Funahashi et al. (2005). For synthetic methods, see: Takahashi et al. (2006); Lin et al. (2005).graphic file with name e-65-0o952-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • C8H2Br4S2

  • M r = 481.86

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 17.164 (3) Å

  • b = 4.0153 (7) Å

  • c = 18.655 (3) Å

  • β = 115.395 (3)°

  • V = 1161.4 (4) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 14.18 mm−1

  • T = 293 K

  • 0.40 × 0.17 × 0.05 mm

Data collection

  • Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2004) T min = 0.258, T max = 1.000 (expected range = 0.122–0.472)

  • 2792 measured reflections

  • 1077 independent reflections

  • 886 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.146

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.078

  • wR(F 2) = 0.208

  • S = 1.00

  • 1077 reflections

  • 64 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 1.15 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −1.06 e Å−3

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2001); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2001); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809011647/kj2109sup1.cif

e-65-0o952-sup1.cif (12.4KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809011647/kj2109Isup2.hkl

e-65-0o952-Isup2.hkl (53.4KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Acknowledgments

Financial support of this project by the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in Universities (No. IRT0526) and Shanghai Natural Science Foundation (No. 06ZR14001) is acknowledged.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

3,3',5,5'-Tetrabromo-2,2'-bithiophene is an important intermediate compound in the synthesis of oligothiophenes and polythiophenes which have recently attracted attention as materials showing conductive, semiconductive, nonlinear optical (NLO), and liquid crystalline characteristics (Roncali, 1997; Funahashi et al., 2005). While synthesis of 3,3',5,5'-tetrabromo-2,2'-bithiophene could be achieved by coupling of 2,3-dibromothiophene (Takahashi et al., 2006) or bromination of 2,2'-bithiophene (Lin et al., 2005), its single crystal structure has not been reported. Herein we present the single crystal structure of the title compound. A molecule of the title compound is located on a crystallographic two-fold rotation axis, thereby imposing equal geometry of the two rings. Each 5-membered ring is planar and the dihedral angle between the planes thorugh the rings is 47.2 (4)°. The molecules arrange in such a fashion that both pairs of bromine atoms (3- and 3'-bromine and 5- and 5'-bromine) lie far away to each other.

Experimental

The title compound was prepared as reported in the literature (Lin et al., 2005). Single crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction measurement were obtained by slow evaporation of a solution in ethanol (m.p. 413 K; literature value: 413–414 K (Takahashi et al., 2006)).

Refinement

All H atoms were placed at calculated positions and refined using a riding model approximation, with C—H = 0.93 Å and with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C).

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

A view of the molecule of the title compound. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level.

Crystal data

C8H2Br4S2 Dx = 2.756 Mg m3
Mr = 481.86 Melting point = 413–414 K
Monoclinic, C2/c Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 17.164 (3) Å Cell parameters from 1249 reflections
b = 4.0153 (7) Å θ = 4.8–55.3°
c = 18.655 (3) Å µ = 14.18 mm1
β = 115.395 (3)° T = 293 K
V = 1161.4 (4) Å3 Prismatic, yellow
Z = 4 0.40 × 0.17 × 0.05 mm
F(000) = 888

Data collection

Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer 1077 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 886 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphite Rint = 0.146
φ and ω scans θmax = 25.5°, θmin = 2.4°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2004) h = −20→18
Tmin = 0.258, Tmax = 1.000 k = −4→4
2792 measured reflections l = −22→21

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.078 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.208 H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.00 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1428P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1077 reflections (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
64 parameters Δρmax = 1.15 e Å3
0 restraints Δρmin = −1.06 e Å3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Br1 0.17755 (6) 0.2991 (3) 0.27753 (6) 0.0443 (5)
Br2 0.11718 (8) 0.7463 (3) 0.54198 (6) 0.0562 (5)
S1 −0.00225 (17) 0.7354 (6) 0.36201 (13) 0.0393 (7)
C1 0.0301 (5) 0.581 (2) 0.2918 (4) 0.0331 (17)
C2 0.1140 (5) 0.480 (2) 0.3291 (4) 0.0354 (17)
C4 0.0973 (6) 0.650 (2) 0.4373 (5) 0.041 (2)
C3 0.1540 (5) 0.521 (2) 0.4129 (4) 0.0411 (19)
H3 0.2109 0.4669 0.4459 0.049*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Br1 0.0524 (7) 0.0457 (7) 0.0483 (7) 0.0023 (4) 0.0344 (6) −0.0050 (4)
Br2 0.0735 (9) 0.0718 (9) 0.0312 (7) −0.0072 (5) 0.0298 (6) −0.0063 (4)
S1 0.0508 (15) 0.0482 (13) 0.0306 (12) 0.0043 (9) 0.0286 (11) −0.0007 (8)
C1 0.050 (5) 0.030 (4) 0.034 (4) 0.000 (4) 0.032 (4) 0.000 (3)
C2 0.052 (5) 0.030 (4) 0.034 (4) −0.006 (3) 0.028 (4) 0.001 (3)
C4 0.059 (6) 0.042 (5) 0.028 (4) 0.003 (4) 0.025 (4) 0.006 (3)
C3 0.050 (5) 0.046 (5) 0.035 (4) −0.003 (4) 0.025 (4) 0.005 (4)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

Br1—C2 1.882 (8) C1—C1i 1.455 (15)
Br2—C4 1.873 (8) C2—C3 1.422 (11)
S1—C4 1.719 (9) C4—C3 1.342 (11)
S1—C1 1.741 (7) C3—H3 0.9300
C1—C2 1.365 (11)
C4—S1—C1 91.0 (4) C3—C4—S1 114.3 (6)
C2—C1—C1i 131.0 (8) C3—C4—Br2 126.8 (7)
C2—C1—S1 109.2 (6) S1—C4—Br2 118.9 (5)
C1i—C1—S1 119.8 (7) C4—C3—C2 109.8 (8)
C1—C2—C3 115.6 (7) C4—C3—H3 125.1
C1—C2—Br1 124.7 (6) C2—C3—H3 125.1
C3—C2—Br1 119.6 (6)
C4—S1—C1—C2 −0.9 (6) C1—S1—C4—C3 1.7 (7)
C4—S1—C1—C1i 179.8 (5) C1—S1—C4—Br2 −179.2 (5)
C1i—C1—C2—C3 179.2 (5) S1—C4—C3—C2 −1.9 (10)
S1—C1—C2—C3 0.1 (9) Br2—C4—C3—C2 179.1 (6)
C1i—C1—C2—Br1 −0.2 (11) C1—C2—C3—C4 1.2 (11)
S1—C1—C2—Br1 −179.4 (4) Br1—C2—C3—C4 −179.4 (6)

Symmetry codes: (i) −x, y, −z+1/2.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: KJ2109).

References

  1. Bruker (2001). SMART and SAINT Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  2. Funahashi, M. & Hanna, J.-I. (2005). Adv. Mater 17, 594–598.
  3. Lin, H.-C., Sung, H.-H., Tsai, C.-M. & Li, K.-C. (2005). Polymer, 46, 9810–9820.
  4. Roncali, J. (1997). Chem. Rev 97, 173–205. [DOI] [PubMed]
  5. Sheldrick, G. M. (2004). SADABS University of Göttingen, Germany.
  6. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. Takahashi, M., Masui, K., Sekiguchi, H., Kobayashi, N., Mori, A., Funahashi, M. & Tamaoki, N. (2006). J. Am. Chem. Soc 128, 10930–10933. [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809011647/kj2109sup1.cif

e-65-0o952-sup1.cif (12.4KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809011647/kj2109Isup2.hkl

e-65-0o952-Isup2.hkl (53.4KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES