Abstract
In the title compound, C7H6ClNS, the dihedral angle between the aromatic ring and the thioamide fragment is 28.1 (2)°. The structure features a π-stacking interaction between the aromatic rings with a slight offset of the rings, giving a centroid–centroid separation of 3.7942 (2) Å. There are intermolecular hydrogen-bonding interactions between the amino group and the S atoms.
Related literature
For the uses of thioamides, see: Akhtar et al. (2006 ▶, 2007 ▶, 2008 ▶); Jagodzinski (2003 ▶); Lebana et al. (2008 ▶). For the biological activity of thioamides, see: Wei et al. (2006 ▶). For the synthesis of thioamides, see: Bauer & Kuhlein (1985 ▶); Cava & Levinson (1985 ▶); Manaka & Sato (2005 ▶). For a comparable structure, see: Jian et al. (2006 ▶).
Experimental
Crystal data
C7H6ClNS
M r = 171.64
Monoclinic,
a = 8.1592 (4) Å
b = 9.0934 (5) Å
c = 10.8915 (6) Å
β = 100.113 (10°
V = 795.54 (7) Å3
Z = 4
Mo Kα radiation
μ = 0.66 mm−1
T = 296 K
0.40 × 0.36 × 0.18 mm
Data collection
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2008 ▶) T min = 0.778, T max = 0.889
6337 measured reflections
1901 independent reflections
1667 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
R int = 0.017
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.037
wR(F 2) = 0.105
S = 1.06
1901 reflections
91 parameters
H-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax = 0.33 e Å−3
Δρmin = −0.38 e Å−3
Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2008 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2008 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶).
Supplementary Material
Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809014640/bt2933sup1.cif
Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809014640/bt2933Isup2.hkl
Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).
| D—H⋯A | D—H | H⋯A | D⋯A | D—H⋯A |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N1—H1A⋯S1i | 0.86 | 2.64 | 3.3769 (15) | 145 |
| N1—H1B⋯S1ii | 0.86 | 2.63 | 3.4527 (15) | 160 |
Symmetry codes: (i)
; (ii)
.
Acknowledgments
MuHK is thankful to the HEC, Pakistan, for a PhD fellowship under the indigenous PhD Program. JDM thanks Saint Mary’s Univeristy for funding.
supplementary crystallographic information
Comment
Thioamides are important precursors/intermediates in the synthesis of various heterocycles (Jagodzinski et al., 2003). Besides being used as synthetic intermediates, they exhibit numerous biological activities (Wei et al., 2006). In addition, thioamides have found use as important ligands in coordination chemistry (Lebana et al., 2008). Several methods for their synthesis have been published involving the uses of Lawesson's regent (Cava et al., 1985) and phosphorus pentasulphide (Bauer et al., 1985). The title compound, 4-chlorobenzothioamide was synthesized in continuation of our previous work on the synthesis and biological screenings of five membered heterocycles (Akhtar et al., 2006, 2007, 2008). In this article the crystal structure of 4-chlorobenzothioamide is being reported. The title compound was synthesized by treating 4-chlorobenzonitrile with 70% sodium hydrogen sulfide hydrate and magnesium chloride hexahydrate in dimethylformamide (Manaka & Sato, 2005) as an intermediate for the synthesis of thiazoles.
The hydrogen bonding interactions between the nitrogen and sulfur atoms are in the range of those seen in p-trifluoromethylbenzothioamide where the corresponding interactions are between 3.3735Å and 3.5133Å (Jian et al., 2006).
Experimental
4-Chlorobenzonitrile (14.5 mmol) was added to a slurry of sodium hydrogen sulfide hydrate (70%, 29 mmol) and magnesium chloride hexahydrate (14.5 mmol) in DMF (40 mL) and the mixture stirred at room temperature for 2 h. The resulting green slurry was poured into water (100 mL) and the precipitated solid collected by filtration. The product obtained was resuspended in 1 N HCl (50 ml), stirred for another 30 min, filtered and washed with excess of water. The recrystallization of the residue from chloroform afforded the crystals of the title compound suitable for X-ray analysis.
Refinement
The hydrogen atoms were placed in geometrically idealized positions of 0.93Å (aromatic C—H) and 0.86Å (amide N—H) and constrained to ride on the parent atom with Uiso(H) = 1.2 Ueq(C,N).
Figures
Fig. 1.
Molecular structure of 4-chlorobenzothioamide showing displacement ellipsoids at the 50% probability level (for non-H atoms).
Fig. 2.
Packing diagram of 4-chlorobenzothioamide as viewed down the b axis. Displacement ellipsoids are shown at the 50% probability level (for non-H atoms).
Crystal data
| C7H6ClNS | F(000) = 352 |
| Mr = 171.64 | Dx = 1.433 Mg m−3 |
| Monoclinic, P21/c | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
| Hall symbol: -P 2ybc | Cell parameters from 3894 reflections |
| a = 8.1592 (4) Å | θ = 2.5–28.5° |
| b = 9.0934 (5) Å | µ = 0.66 mm−1 |
| c = 10.8915 (6) Å | T = 296 K |
| β = 100.113 (1)° | Block, yellow |
| V = 795.54 (7) Å3 | 0.40 × 0.36 × 0.18 mm |
| Z = 4 |
Data collection
| Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer | 1901 independent reflections |
| Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 1667 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
| graphite | Rint = 0.017 |
| φ and ω scans | θmax = 28.5°, θmin = 2.9° |
| Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2008) | h = −10→10 |
| Tmin = 0.778, Tmax = 0.889 | k = −12→12 |
| 6337 measured reflections | l = −9→14 |
Refinement
| Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
| Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
| R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.037 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
| wR(F2) = 0.105 | H-atom parameters constrained |
| S = 1.06 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0539P)2 + 0.2817P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
| 1901 reflections | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
| 91 parameters | Δρmax = 0.33 e Å−3 |
| 0 restraints | Δρmin = −0.38 e Å−3 |
Special details
| Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
| Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)
| x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
| S1 | 0.08443 (7) | 0.15260 (5) | 0.36191 (4) | 0.05425 (18) | |
| Cl1 | 0.41127 (8) | 0.84764 (5) | 0.55354 (7) | 0.0767 (2) | |
| N1 | 0.1431 (2) | 0.16063 (15) | 0.60516 (12) | 0.0479 (4) | |
| H1A | 0.1776 | 0.2025 | 0.6758 | 0.058* | |
| H1B | 0.1046 | 0.0724 | 0.6028 | 0.058* | |
| C1 | 0.14913 (18) | 0.23175 (17) | 0.50045 (13) | 0.0367 (3) | |
| C2 | 0.21721 (18) | 0.38334 (16) | 0.51285 (13) | 0.0346 (3) | |
| C7 | 0.16710 (19) | 0.48716 (18) | 0.41971 (14) | 0.0402 (3) | |
| H7A | 0.0925 | 0.4603 | 0.3485 | 0.048* | |
| C5 | 0.3367 (2) | 0.66844 (17) | 0.53788 (18) | 0.0466 (4) | |
| C6 | 0.2270 (2) | 0.62963 (18) | 0.43192 (17) | 0.0462 (4) | |
| H6A | 0.1937 | 0.6984 | 0.3693 | 0.055* | |
| C3 | 0.3294 (2) | 0.42569 (19) | 0.61821 (15) | 0.0448 (4) | |
| H3A | 0.3647 | 0.3573 | 0.6808 | 0.054* | |
| C4 | 0.3893 (2) | 0.5685 (2) | 0.63118 (17) | 0.0515 (4) | |
| H4A | 0.4641 | 0.5963 | 0.7020 | 0.062* |
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)
| U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
| S1 | 0.0851 (4) | 0.0495 (3) | 0.0281 (2) | −0.0239 (2) | 0.0096 (2) | −0.00374 (15) |
| Cl1 | 0.0841 (4) | 0.0399 (3) | 0.1008 (5) | −0.0176 (2) | 0.0012 (3) | −0.0009 (2) |
| N1 | 0.0790 (10) | 0.0363 (7) | 0.0299 (7) | −0.0104 (6) | 0.0134 (6) | −0.0014 (5) |
| C1 | 0.0449 (7) | 0.0369 (7) | 0.0291 (7) | −0.0020 (6) | 0.0091 (6) | −0.0005 (5) |
| C2 | 0.0393 (7) | 0.0345 (7) | 0.0307 (7) | −0.0002 (5) | 0.0085 (5) | −0.0002 (5) |
| C7 | 0.0438 (7) | 0.0415 (8) | 0.0341 (8) | 0.0001 (6) | 0.0030 (6) | 0.0029 (6) |
| C5 | 0.0457 (8) | 0.0337 (7) | 0.0604 (11) | −0.0048 (6) | 0.0095 (7) | −0.0024 (7) |
| C6 | 0.0489 (8) | 0.0383 (8) | 0.0504 (10) | 0.0020 (7) | 0.0056 (7) | 0.0095 (7) |
| C3 | 0.0520 (9) | 0.0422 (8) | 0.0374 (8) | −0.0029 (7) | −0.0002 (6) | 0.0040 (6) |
| C4 | 0.0539 (9) | 0.0483 (9) | 0.0477 (10) | −0.0087 (7) | −0.0036 (7) | −0.0042 (7) |
Geometric parameters (Å, °)
| S1—C1 | 1.6714 (15) | C7—C6 | 1.383 (2) |
| Cl1—C5 | 1.7374 (16) | C7—H7A | 0.9300 |
| N1—C1 | 1.3195 (19) | C5—C4 | 1.375 (3) |
| N1—H1A | 0.8600 | C5—C6 | 1.376 (3) |
| N1—H1B | 0.8600 | C6—H6A | 0.9300 |
| C1—C2 | 1.483 (2) | C3—C4 | 1.386 (2) |
| C2—C3 | 1.391 (2) | C3—H3A | 0.9300 |
| C2—C7 | 1.393 (2) | C4—H4A | 0.9300 |
| C1—N1—H1A | 120.0 | C4—C5—C6 | 121.55 (15) |
| C1—N1—H1B | 120.0 | C4—C5—Cl1 | 119.26 (14) |
| H1A—N1—H1B | 120.0 | C6—C5—Cl1 | 119.19 (14) |
| N1—C1—C2 | 116.55 (13) | C5—C6—C7 | 119.19 (15) |
| N1—C1—S1 | 121.02 (12) | C5—C6—H6A | 120.4 |
| C2—C1—S1 | 122.42 (11) | C7—C6—H6A | 120.4 |
| C3—C2—C7 | 118.65 (14) | C4—C3—C2 | 120.85 (15) |
| C3—C2—C1 | 120.94 (14) | C4—C3—H3A | 119.6 |
| C7—C2—C1 | 120.40 (13) | C2—C3—H3A | 119.6 |
| C6—C7—C2 | 120.74 (15) | C5—C4—C3 | 119.02 (15) |
| C6—C7—H7A | 119.6 | C5—C4—H4A | 120.5 |
| C2—C7—H7A | 119.6 | C3—C4—H4A | 120.5 |
| S1—C1—C2—C7 | 28.1 (2) |
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)
| D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
| N1—H1A···S1i | 0.86 | 2.64 | 3.3769 (15) | 145 |
| N1—H1B···S1ii | 0.86 | 2.63 | 3.4527 (15) | 160 |
Symmetry codes: (i) x, −y+1/2, z+1/2; (ii) −x, −y, −z+1.
Footnotes
Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: BT2933).
References
- Akhtar, T., Hameed, S., Al-Masoudi, N. A. & Khan, K. M. (2007). Heteroat. Chem.18, 316–322.
- Akhtar, T., Hameed, S., Al-Masoudi, N. A., Loddo, R. & La Colla, P. (2008). Acta Pharm.58, 135–149. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Akhtar, T., Hameed, S., Lu, X., Yasin, K. A. & Khan, M. H. (2006). Anal. Sci. X-ray Struct. Anal. Online, 22, x307–308.
- Bauer, W. & Kuhlein, K. (1985). Houben–Weyl Methoden der Organischen Chemie, Vol. E5, p 1218. Stuttgart, New York: Georg Thieme Verlag.
- Bruker (2008). APEX2, SAINT and SADABS Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
- Cava, M. P. & Levinson, M. I. (1985). Tetrahedron, 41, 5061–5087.
- Farrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst.30, 565.
- Jagodzinski, T. S. (2003). Chem. Rev.103, 197–227. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Jian, F. F., Zhao, P., Zhang, L. & Zheng, J. (2006). J. Fluorine Chem.127, 63–67.
- Lebana, S. T., Sultana, R. & Hendal, G. (2008). Polyhedron, 27, 1008–1016.
- Manaka, A. & Sato, M. (2005). Synth. Commun.35, 761–764.
- Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Wei, Q.-L., Zhang, S.-S., Gao, J., Li, W.-H., Xu, L.-Z. & Yu, Z.-G. (2006). Bioorg. Med. Chem.14, 7146–7153. [DOI] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809014640/bt2933sup1.cif
Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809014640/bt2933Isup2.hkl
Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


