Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov 9;341:c5943. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c5943

Table 2.

 Summary of 2×2 tables indicating correct and incorrect diagnoses of endobronchial intubation and correct and incorrect diagnoses of excluding endobronchial intubation by different methods for assessment of position of endotracheal tube.* Each of 20 patients in each group assessed independently by experienced and inexperienced anaesthetists resulting in 40 independent observations

Tube position and diagnosis Auscultation Observation Depth All three
Endobronchial position:
 Correct diagnosis 26 17 35 40
 Incorrect diagnosis 14 23 5 0
Tracheal position:
 Correct diagnosis 37 36 39 38
 Incorrect diagnosis 3 4 1 2
Odds ratio (95% CI)† 10.5 (2.3 to 47.5), P=0.002 19.9 (4.5 to 88.5), P<0.001 3.2 (0.6 to 17.0), P=0.18 1

*Bilateral auscultation of chest; observation of symmetrical chest movements; checking cm scale (depth); or combination of all three.

†Odds ratio to predict incorrect tube position according to bedside test with “all three” as baseline category from logistic regression model with 95% confidence intervals calculated from robust standard errors to allow for correlation within patients.