Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2010 May 12;66(Pt 6):o1315. doi: 10.1107/S1600536810016612

6-De­oxy-6-fluoro-d-galactose

Sarah F Jenkinson a,*, Daniel Best a, Ken Izumori b, Francis X Wilson c, Alexander C Weymouth-Wilson d, George W J Fleet a, Amber L Thompson e
PMCID: PMC2979621  PMID: 21579408

Abstract

The crystal structure unequivocally confirms the relative stereochemistry of the title compound, C6H11FO5. The absolute stereochemistry was determined by the use of d-galactose as the starting material. The compound exists as a three-dimensional O—H⋯O hydrogen-bonded network with each mol­ecule acting as a donor and acceptor for four hydrogen bonds.

Related literature

For literature relating to the biotechnological inter­conversion of carbohydrates (Izumoring), see: Granström et al. (2004); Izumori (2006); Jones et al. (2008); Rao et al. (2009); Jenkinson et al. (2009); Gullapalli et al. (2010). For literature relating to fluoro­sugars, see: Cobb et al. (2005); Caravano et al. (2009); Brackhagen et al. (2001); Taylor & Kent (1958).graphic file with name e-66-o1315-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • C6H11FO5

  • M r = 182.15

  • Orthorhombic, Inline graphic

  • a = 6.7928 (3) Å

  • b = 7.5822 (3) Å

  • c = 14.1165 (6) Å

  • V = 727.06 (5) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.16 mm−1

  • T = 150 K

  • 0.25 × 0.15 × 0.15 mm

Data collection

  • Area diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (DENZO/SCALEPACK; Otwinowski & Minor, 1997) T min = 0.88, T max = 0.98

  • 6912 measured reflections

  • 978 independent reflections

  • 855 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.082

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.048

  • wR(F 2) = 0.119

  • S = 1.00

  • 978 reflections

  • 109 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.39 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.33 e Å−3

Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 2001); cell refinement: DENZO/SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997); data reduction: DENZO/SCALEPACK; program(s) used to solve structure: SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1994); program(s) used to refine structure: CRYSTALS (Betteridge et al., 2003); molecular graphics: CAMERON (Watkin et al., 1996); software used to prepare material for publication: CRYSTALS.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810016612/lh5035sup1.cif

e-66-o1315-sup1.cif (13.6KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810016612/lh5035Isup2.hkl

e-66-o1315-Isup2.hkl (49.4KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O12—H121⋯O8i 0.82 1.95 2.769 (4) 177
O11—H111⋯O12ii 0.84 1.96 2.781 (4) 168
O6—H61⋯O4iii 0.84 1.91 2.747 (4) 174
O8—H81⋯O6i 0.82 1.93 2.739 (4) 169

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic; (iii) Inline graphic.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

Izumoring, a strategy for the biotechnological interconversion of aldoses, ketoses and alditols (Granström et al. 2004, Izumori 2006) allows convenient access to rare monosaccharides. Interconversions are achieved by regioselective microbial oxidation of alditols to give the corresponding ketoses, followed by enzymatic isomerisation to aldoses. Stereochemical diversity is introduced at C-2 in the keto-aldose isomerisation step and at C-3 by the epimerisation of ketoses, catalysed by D-tagatose-3-epimerase. In addition to the simple monosaccharides, this strategy is effective for the interconversion of deoxy (Gullapalli et al. 2010, Rao et al. 2009), methyl-branched (Jones et al. 2008) and azido (Jenkinson et al. 2009) sugars.

Fluorosugars have not been isolated from natural sources and consequently, in order to study metabolic processes, their passage along various biological pathways can be effectively tracked with the detection of fluorinated metabolites by 19F NMR (Cobb et al. 2005). The fluoro modification of sugars affects their hydrogen bonding capability and fluorosugars have been shown to resemble deoxy sugars such as fucose and rhamnose in terms of enzymatic recognition (Caravano et al. 2009). Application of the Izumoring strategy to fluorinated substrates would allow the bulk preparation of fluorosugars, an important and interesting class of carbohydrates.

6-Deoxy-6-fluoro-D-galactose was prepared from D-galactose diacetonide 1 (Fig. 1). Fluoride was introduced nucleophilically to give the protected fluorogalactose 2 in 68% yield as previously described for the enantiomer (Brackhagen et al. 2001). Dowex resin (H+) catalysed hydrolysis of the diacetonide gave the free 6-deoxy-6-fluoro-D-galactose 3 in 98% yield.

X-ray crystallography unequivocally confirmed the relative stereochemistry of the title compound. The absolute stereochemistry was determined by the use of D-galactose as the starting material. The compound exists as an extensively hydrogen-bonded lattice with each molecule acting as a donor and acceptor for 4 hydrogen bonds. Only classical hydrogen bonding is considered.

Experimental

The title compound was recrystallised by vapour diffusion from a mixture of ethanol and water [m.p. 431-433 K;[α]D25 initial: +119.8, equilibrium: +69.4 (c 1.12, H2O) {Lit. (Taylor & Kent, 1958) m.p. 433 K; [α]D20 initial: +135, equilibrium: +76.5 (c 0.967, H2O)].

Refinement

In the absence of significant anomalous scattering, Friedel pairs were merged and the absolute configuration was assigned from the use of D-galactose as the starting material.

The H atoms were all located in a difference map, but those attached to carbon atoms were repositioned geometrically. The H atoms were initially refined with soft restraints on the bond lengths and angles to regularize their geometry (C—H in the range 0.93–0.98, O—H = 0.82 Å) and Uiso(H) (in the range 1.2–1.5 times Ueq of the parent atom), after which the positions were refined with riding constraints.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Synthetic Scheme.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

The title compound with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level. H atoms are shown as spheres of arbitrary radius.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Packing diagram of the title compound projected along the b-axis. Hydrogen bonds are shown by dotted lines.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Packing diagram of the title compound projected along the a-axis. Hydrogen bonds are shown by dotted lines.

Crystal data

C6H11FO5 F(000) = 384
Mr = 182.15 Dx = 1.664 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, P212121 Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: P 2ac 2ab Cell parameters from 976 reflections
a = 6.7928 (3) Å θ = 5–27°
b = 7.5822 (3) Å µ = 0.16 mm1
c = 14.1165 (6) Å T = 150 K
V = 727.06 (5) Å3 Plate, colourless
Z = 4 0.25 × 0.15 × 0.15 mm

Data collection

Area diffractometer 855 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphite Rint = 0.082
ω scans θmax = 27.4°, θmin = 5.1°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (DENZO/SCALEPACK; Otwinowski & Minor, 1997) h = −8→8
Tmin = 0.88, Tmax = 0.98 k = −9→9
6912 measured reflections l = −18→18
978 independent reflections

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.048 H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.119 Method = Modified Sheldrick w = 1/[σ2(F2) + ( 0.06P)2 + 0.71P], where P = [max(Fo2,0) + 2Fc2]/3
S = 1.00 (Δ/σ)max = 0.0002
978 reflections Δρmax = 0.39 e Å3
109 parameters Δρmin = −0.33 e Å3
0 restraints

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
F1 0.9642 (3) 0.0074 (3) 0.67642 (15) 0.0322
C2 0.8064 (5) 0.1203 (4) 0.7000 (2) 0.0241
C3 0.8368 (5) 0.2957 (4) 0.6533 (2) 0.0197
O4 0.8221 (3) 0.2665 (3) 0.55221 (14) 0.0197
C5 0.8651 (5) 0.4205 (4) 0.4981 (2) 0.0199
O6 1.0586 (3) 0.4776 (3) 0.51563 (17) 0.0249
C7 0.7217 (5) 0.5681 (4) 0.5230 (2) 0.0193
O8 0.7765 (3) 0.7197 (3) 0.46922 (16) 0.0253
C9 0.7242 (5) 0.6033 (4) 0.6292 (2) 0.0196
C10 0.6857 (5) 0.4332 (4) 0.6843 (2) 0.0207
O11 0.4899 (3) 0.3738 (3) 0.66532 (15) 0.0234
O12 0.5874 (3) 0.7379 (3) 0.65554 (15) 0.0225
H21 0.6889 0.0662 0.6738 0.0302*
H22 0.7979 0.1319 0.7701 0.0295*
H31 0.9723 0.3377 0.6670 0.0229*
H51 0.8463 0.3902 0.4278 0.0240*
H71 0.5858 0.5333 0.5064 0.0246*
H91 0.8539 0.6454 0.6460 0.0234*
H101 0.7044 0.4557 0.7541 0.0250*
H121 0.4980 0.7488 0.6170 0.0346*
H111 0.4489 0.3361 0.7175 0.0347*
H61 1.1320 0.3983 0.4931 0.0374*
H81 0.7170 0.8119 0.4811 0.0389*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
F1 0.0339 (11) 0.0274 (10) 0.0352 (11) 0.0100 (9) 0.0011 (9) 0.0051 (9)
C2 0.0227 (16) 0.0222 (15) 0.0273 (15) 0.0057 (15) 0.0012 (14) 0.0016 (13)
C3 0.0187 (14) 0.0211 (14) 0.0193 (14) 0.0019 (13) 0.0003 (12) 0.0014 (12)
O4 0.0221 (11) 0.0165 (10) 0.0205 (10) −0.0024 (9) 0.0011 (9) 0.0005 (9)
C5 0.0189 (15) 0.0168 (14) 0.0241 (14) −0.0029 (12) 0.0029 (12) 0.0020 (12)
O6 0.0193 (12) 0.0195 (10) 0.0359 (12) 0.0006 (9) 0.0060 (10) −0.0002 (9)
C7 0.0205 (16) 0.0171 (14) 0.0204 (14) 0.0006 (12) 0.0028 (12) 0.0018 (12)
O8 0.0307 (12) 0.0176 (10) 0.0277 (11) 0.0021 (10) 0.0077 (10) 0.0035 (9)
C9 0.0172 (15) 0.0171 (14) 0.0246 (15) 0.0033 (13) 0.0001 (12) −0.0020 (12)
C10 0.0192 (16) 0.0228 (15) 0.0203 (14) 0.0005 (13) −0.0016 (12) 0.0012 (12)
O11 0.0185 (11) 0.0281 (12) 0.0236 (11) −0.0034 (10) 0.0013 (9) 0.0023 (10)
O12 0.0220 (11) 0.0230 (11) 0.0226 (10) 0.0054 (10) −0.0005 (9) −0.0038 (10)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

F1—C2 1.412 (4) C7—O8 1.428 (4)
C2—C3 1.499 (4) C7—C9 1.522 (4)
C2—H21 0.971 C7—H71 0.988
C2—H22 0.995 O8—H81 0.824
C3—O4 1.448 (3) C9—C10 1.528 (4)
C3—C10 1.527 (4) C9—O12 1.430 (4)
C3—H31 0.992 C9—H91 0.967
O4—C5 1.426 (4) C10—O11 1.430 (4)
C5—O6 1.406 (4) C10—H101 1.008
C5—C7 1.524 (4) O11—H111 0.838
C5—H51 1.027 O12—H121 0.820
O6—H61 0.843
F1—C2—C3 109.2 (3) C5—C7—C9 110.4 (2)
F1—C2—H21 106.2 O8—C7—C9 112.3 (2)
C3—C2—H21 108.7 C5—C7—H71 110.3
F1—C2—H22 109.4 O8—C7—H71 109.4
C3—C2—H22 111.5 C9—C7—H71 106.9
H21—C2—H22 111.7 C7—O8—H81 116.5
C2—C3—O4 106.8 (2) C7—C9—C10 110.5 (3)
C2—C3—C10 112.8 (3) C7—C9—O12 112.0 (2)
O4—C3—C10 109.9 (2) C10—C9—O12 111.0 (2)
C2—C3—H31 109.1 C7—C9—H91 108.1
O4—C3—H31 107.8 C10—C9—H91 108.0
C10—C3—H31 110.3 O12—C9—H91 107.0
C3—O4—C5 112.9 (2) C9—C10—C3 108.4 (3)
O4—C5—O6 110.4 (3) C9—C10—O11 109.2 (3)
O4—C5—C7 110.3 (2) C3—C10—O11 110.9 (3)
O6—C5—C7 109.3 (2) C9—C10—H101 109.5
O4—C5—H51 108.0 C3—C10—H101 108.1
O6—C5—H51 110.8 O11—C10—H101 110.7
C7—C5—H51 107.9 C10—O11—H111 104.6
C5—O6—H61 105.5 C9—O12—H121 112.3
C5—C7—O8 107.6 (2)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
C2—H21···O12i 0.97 2.60 3.318 (4) 131
C5—H51···O11ii 1.03 2.59 3.320 (4) 128
O12—H121···O8iii 0.82 1.95 2.769 (4) 177
O11—H111···O12iv 0.84 1.96 2.781 (4) 168
O6—H61···O4ii 0.84 1.91 2.747 (4) 174
O8—H81···O6iii 0.82 1.93 2.739 (4) 169

Symmetry codes: (i) x, y−1, z; (ii) x+1/2, −y+1/2, −z+1; (iii) x−1/2, −y+3/2, −z+1; (iv) −x+1, y−1/2, −z+3/2.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: LH5035).

References

  1. Altomare, A., Cascarano, G., Giacovazzo, C., Guagliardi, A., Burla, M. C., Polidori, G. & Camalli, M. (1994). J. Appl. Cryst.27, 435.
  2. Betteridge, P. W., Carruthers, J. R., Cooper, R. I., Prout, K. & Watkin, D. J. (2003). J. Appl. Cryst.36, 1487.
  3. Brackhagen, M., Boye, H. & Vogel, C. (2001). J. Carbohydr. Chem.20, 31–43.
  4. Caravano, A., Field, R. A., Percy, J. M., Rinaudo, G., Roig, R. & Singh, K. (2009). Org. Biomol. Chem.7, 996–1008. [DOI] [PubMed]
  5. Cobb, S. L., Deng, H., Hamilton, J. T. G., McGlinchey, R. P., O’Hagan, D. & Schaffrath, C. (2005). Bioorg. Chem.33, 393–401. [DOI] [PubMed]
  6. Granström, T. B., Takata, G., Tokuda, M. & Izumori, K. J. (2004). J. Biosci. Bioeng.97, 89–94. [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. Gullapalli, P., Yoshihara, A., Morimoto, K., Rao, D., Akimitsu, K., Jenkinson, S. F., Fleet, G. W. J. & Izumori, K. (2010). Tetrahedron Lett.51, 895–898.
  8. Izumori, K. J. (2006). J. Biotechnol.124, 717–722. [DOI] [PubMed]
  9. Jenkinson, S. F., Booth, K. V., Newberry, S., Fleet, G. W. J., Izumori, K., Morimoto, K., Nash, R. J., Jones, L., Watkin, D. J. & Thompson, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. E65, o1755–o1756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  10. Jones, N. A., Rao, D., Yoshihara, A., Gullapalli, P., Morimoto, K., Takata, G., Hunter, S. J., Wormald, M. R., Dwek, R. A., Izumori, K. & Fleet, G. W. J. (2008). Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 16, 1904–1918.
  11. Nonius (2001). COLLECT Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands.
  12. Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 276, Macromolecular Crystallography, Part A, edited by C. W. Carter Jr & R. M. Sweet, pp. 307–326. New York: Academic Press.
  13. Rao, D., Best, D., Yoshihara, A., Gullapalli, P., Morimoto, K., Wormald, M. R., Wilson, F. X., Izumori, K. & Fleet, G. W. J. (2009). Tetrahedron Lett.50, 3559–3563.
  14. Taylor, N. F. & Kent, P. W. (1958). J. Chem. Soc. pp. 872–875.
  15. Watkin, D. J., Prout, C. K. & Pearce, L. J. (1996). CAMERON Chemical Crystallography Laboratory, Oxford, England.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810016612/lh5035sup1.cif

e-66-o1315-sup1.cif (13.6KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810016612/lh5035Isup2.hkl

e-66-o1315-Isup2.hkl (49.4KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES