Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2009 Dec 4;66(Pt 1):o61. doi: 10.1107/S1600536809051265

3-Amino-1-methyl­pyrazin-1-ium chloride

Daniel Foucher a, Stephen Wylie a, Joshua Acosta a, Alan J Lough b,*
PMCID: PMC2980274  PMID: 21580163

Abstract

In the cation of the title compound, C5H8N3 +·Cl, the C—N(H2) bond distance [1.348 (3) Å] is at the lower end of the range for aryl amines. In the crystal structure, cations and anions are linked via N—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds, forming one-dimensional chains along [100].

Related literature

For the synthesis and characterization of the title compound, see: Foucher et al. (1993). Additional preparative details of similar compounds are given by Goto et al. (1968). For related structures, see Chao et al. (1976); Kazheva et al. (2006); Foucher et al. (1989); Lu & Xi (2008). For the crystal structure of 3-amino-1- methylpyrazin-1-ium iodide, see: Foucher et al. (2009). For comparative bond-distance data, see: Allen et al. (1987).graphic file with name e-66-00o61-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • C5H8N3 +·Cl

  • M r = 145.59

  • Orthorhombic, Inline graphic

  • a = 11.3164 (3) Å

  • b = 9.5029 (5) Å

  • c = 12.3877 (5) Å

  • V = 1332.16 (10) Å3

  • Z = 8

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.48 mm−1

  • T = 150 K

  • 0.24 × 0.16 × 0.12 mm

Data collection

  • Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SORTAV; Blessing 1995) T min = 0.819, T max = 0.946

  • 9107 measured reflections

  • 1526 independent reflections

  • 1144 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.047

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.040

  • wR(F 2) = 0.111

  • S = 1.10

  • 1526 reflections

  • 91 parameters

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 0.46 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.28 e Å−3

Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius BV, 2002); cell refinement: DENZO-SMN (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997); data reduction: DENZO-SMN; program(s) used to solve structure: SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1994); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2009); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809051265/tk2586sup1.cif

e-66-00o61-sup1.cif (13.1KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809051265/tk2586Isup2.hkl

e-66-00o61-Isup2.hkl (75.4KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N7—H1N⋯Cl1 0.91 (3) 2.40 (3) 3.297 (2) 168 (2)
N7—H2N⋯Cl1i 0.94 (3) 2.37 (3) 3.289 (2) 168 (3)

Symmetry code: (i) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge NSERC Canada, the University of Toronto and the Dean’s Seed Fund Initiative (Ryerson University) for funding.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

The title chloride compound, (I), was recovered from the ion exchange (Dowex 1-X8 ion exchange resin saturated with Cl- anions) of the iodide precursor of N-methyl-3-aminopyrazinium iodide (Foucher et al., 1993). The proximity of the amine group to one of the diazine N atoms makes it an ideal chelating ligand to metals and geometrically suggests the possibility for amine-imine tautomerism. We have investigated the possibility that a smaller counter ion might induce a preference for the imine tautomer in these salts.

The molecular structure of (I) is shown in Fig. 1. The cation is the amine tautomer and resembles closely in terms of bond angles and bond lengths, other N-methylated amino pyrazinium salts (Kazheva et al., 2006; Foucher et al., 1989). The C5—N4—C3 bond angle in (I) [121.02 (18) °] is significantly wider than in 2-aminopyrazine [116.6 (1)°] (Chao et al., 1976) but similar to the angle found in N-methyl-3-aminopyrazinium iodide (121.3 (5)°; Foucher et al., 2010). 2-Aminopyrazine and both N-methyl-3-aminopyrazium salts are characterized by short amine-ring bond distances [N7—C6 in (I) = 1.348 (3) Å, 1.341 (1)Å (Chao et al., 1976) and 1.338 (8)Å (Foucher et al., 2009)] compared to typical values for C(sp2)-NH2 bond lengths, i.e. 1.36 Å (Allen et al., 1987)] although these distances are significantly longer than the C=N(H) bond [1.285 (4) Å] in N-(4-imino-3,5-dimethylcyclohexa-2,5-dienylidene)-2,6-dimethylaniline (Lu & Xi, 2008). These short bond lengths are suggestive of a considerable degree of double bond character, where the lone pair of the amine participates in the resonance of the ring π system. In the crystal structure, cations and anions are linked via intermolecular N—H···Cl hydrogen bonds to form one-dimensional chains along [100], Table 1 and Fig. 2.

Experimental

General procedures for the synthesis of this type of compound are given by Goto et al. (1968) and Kazheva et al. (2006). The title compound was recovered from the ion exchange (Dowex 1-X8 ion exchange resin saturated with Cl- anion) of a concentrated aqueous solution containing 0.30 g (1.266 mmol) of N-methyl-3-pyrazinium iodide (Foucher et al., 1993). The aqueous fractions containing the crude title compound were collected and brought to dryness. Crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction were isolated from the recrystallization of the crude product from boiling ethanol. Yield 0.11 g, 78%. Characterization by NMR agreed with previous literature (Foucher et al., 1993).

Refinement

H atoms bonded to C atoms were placed in calculated positions with C—H = 0.95 and 0.98 Å, and included in a riding-model approximation with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C) or 1.5Ueq(Cmethyl). H atoms bonded to the amine group N atom were refined independently with isotropic displacement parameters.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The asymmetric unit of (I) with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 30% probability level. The dashed line indicates a hydrogen bond.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Part of the crystal structure of (I) with hydrogen bonds shown as dashed lines.

Crystal data

C5H8N3+·Cl F(000) = 608
Mr = 145.59 Dx = 1.452 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, Pbca Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ac 2ab Cell parameters from 9107 reflections
a = 11.3164 (3) Å θ = 3.3–27.5°
b = 9.5029 (5) Å µ = 0.48 mm1
c = 12.3877 (5) Å T = 150 K
V = 1332.16 (10) Å3 Needle, pale yellow
Z = 8 0.24 × 0.16 × 0.12 mm

Data collection

Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer 1526 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 1144 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphite Rint = 0.047
Detector resolution: 9 pixels mm-1 θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.3°
φ scans and ω scans with κ offsets h = −14→14
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SORTAV; Blessing 1995) k = −11→12
Tmin = 0.819, Tmax = 0.946 l = −16→15
9107 measured reflections

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.040 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.111 H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.10 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0514P)2 + 0.7939P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1526 reflections (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
91 parameters Δρmax = 0.46 e Å3
0 restraints Δρmin = −0.28 e Å3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Cl1 0.52068 (5) 0.20079 (5) 0.55295 (4) 0.02322 (19)
N1 0.80709 (16) 0.15734 (19) 0.21473 (15) 0.0255 (4)
C2 0.7861 (2) 0.0803 (2) 0.12664 (17) 0.0257 (5)
H2A 0.8438 0.0795 0.0710 0.031*
C3 0.68473 (19) 0.0018 (2) 0.11251 (17) 0.0256 (5)
H3A 0.6730 −0.0519 0.0487 0.031*
N4 0.60290 (15) 0.00317 (17) 0.19137 (13) 0.0202 (4)
C5 0.61964 (18) 0.0768 (2) 0.28134 (16) 0.0207 (5)
H5A 0.5618 0.0767 0.3369 0.025*
C6 0.72478 (18) 0.1552 (2) 0.29291 (17) 0.0212 (5)
N7 0.74454 (18) 0.2293 (2) 0.38395 (16) 0.0301 (5)
C8 0.49086 (19) −0.0728 (2) 0.17540 (19) 0.0256 (5)
H8A 0.4646 −0.1126 0.2443 0.038*
H8B 0.5026 −0.1488 0.1231 0.038*
H8C 0.4308 −0.0075 0.1482 0.038*
H1N 0.691 (2) 0.227 (3) 0.438 (2) 0.035 (7)*
H2N 0.821 (3) 0.263 (3) 0.397 (2) 0.058 (9)*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Cl1 0.0224 (3) 0.0264 (3) 0.0209 (3) −0.0013 (2) 0.0005 (2) −0.00014 (19)
N1 0.0213 (9) 0.0295 (9) 0.0257 (10) 0.0032 (8) 0.0023 (8) 0.0047 (8)
C2 0.0255 (11) 0.0306 (11) 0.0210 (11) 0.0062 (9) 0.0037 (9) 0.0048 (9)
C3 0.0299 (12) 0.0267 (11) 0.0202 (11) 0.0069 (9) 0.0027 (9) 0.0000 (9)
N4 0.0211 (9) 0.0195 (8) 0.0199 (9) 0.0032 (7) −0.0003 (7) 0.0014 (7)
C5 0.0206 (10) 0.0225 (10) 0.0191 (11) 0.0037 (8) 0.0011 (8) 0.0008 (8)
C6 0.0206 (11) 0.0218 (10) 0.0212 (11) 0.0029 (8) −0.0004 (8) 0.0025 (8)
N7 0.0209 (10) 0.0421 (12) 0.0272 (11) −0.0047 (9) 0.0017 (9) −0.0085 (9)
C8 0.0241 (11) 0.0273 (11) 0.0254 (12) −0.0029 (9) −0.0020 (9) −0.0047 (9)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

N1—C2 1.335 (3) C5—C6 1.411 (3)
N1—C6 1.344 (3) C5—H5A 0.9500
C2—C3 1.380 (3) C6—N7 1.348 (3)
C2—H2A 0.9500 N7—H1N 0.91 (3)
C3—N4 1.346 (3) N7—H2N 0.94 (3)
C3—H3A 0.9500 C8—H8A 0.9800
N4—C5 1.330 (3) C8—H8B 0.9800
N4—C8 1.472 (3) C8—H8C 0.9800
C2—N1—C6 117.23 (18) N1—C6—N7 118.70 (19)
N1—C2—C3 123.2 (2) N1—C6—C5 121.26 (19)
N1—C2—H2A 118.4 N7—C6—C5 120.03 (19)
C3—C2—H2A 118.4 C6—N7—H1N 119.8 (16)
N4—C3—C2 118.34 (19) C6—N7—H2N 118.6 (19)
N4—C3—H3A 120.8 H1N—N7—H2N 120 (2)
C2—C3—H3A 120.8 N4—C8—H8A 109.5
C5—N4—C3 121.02 (18) N4—C8—H8B 109.5
C5—N4—C8 119.57 (17) H8A—C8—H8B 109.5
C3—N4—C8 119.35 (18) N4—C8—H8C 109.5
N4—C5—C6 118.90 (19) H8A—C8—H8C 109.5
N4—C5—H5A 120.6 H8B—C8—H8C 109.5
C6—C5—H5A 120.6

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
N7—H1N···Cl1 0.91 (3) 2.40 (3) 3.297 (2) 168 (2)
N7—H2N···Cl1i 0.94 (3) 2.37 (3) 3.289 (2) 168 (3)

Symmetry codes: (i) x+1/2, −y+1/2, −z+1.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: TK2586).

References

  1. Allen, F. H., Kennard, O., Watson, D. G., Brammer, L., Orpen, A. G. & Taylor, R. (1987). J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, pp. S1–19.
  2. Altomare, A., Cascarano, G., Giacovazzo, C., Guagliardi, A., Burla, M. C., Polidori, G. & Camalli, M. (1994). J. Appl. Cryst.27, 435.
  3. Blessing, R. H. (1995). Acta Cryst. A51, 33–38. [DOI] [PubMed]
  4. Chao, M., Schempp, E. & Rosenstein, R. D. (1976). Acta Cryst. B32, 288–290.
  5. Foucher, D. A., Fortier, S. & Macartney, D. H. (1989). Acta Cryst. C45, 112–114.
  6. Foucher, D. A., Macartney, D. H., Warrack, L. J. & Wilson, J. P. (1993). Inorg. Chem.32, 3425–3432.
  7. Foucher, D., Wylie, S., Macartney, D. H. & Lough, A. J. (2010). Acta Cryst. E66, o60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  8. Goto, T., Isobe, M., Ohtsuru, M. & Tori, K. (1968). Tetrahedron Lett.12, 1511–1514.
  9. Kazheva, O. N., Ziolkovskiy, D. V., Alexandrov, G. G., Chekhlov, A. N., Dyachenko, O. A., Starodub, V. A. & Khotkevich, A. V. (2006). Synth. Met 156, 1010–1016.
  10. Lu, W. & Xi, C. (2008). Tetrahedron Lett.49, 4011–4015.
  11. Nonius BV (2002). COLLECT Delft, The Netherlands.
  12. Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 276, Macromolecular Crystallography, Part A edited by C. W. Carter & R. M. Sweet pp. 307–326. London: Academic press.
  13. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  14. Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809051265/tk2586sup1.cif

e-66-00o61-sup1.cif (13.1KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809051265/tk2586Isup2.hkl

e-66-00o61-Isup2.hkl (75.4KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES