Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1989 Oct;86(19):7336–7340. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.19.7336

Geometry of a branched DNA structure in solution.

J P Cooper 1, P J Hagerman 1
PMCID: PMC298056  PMID: 2798413

Abstract

An approximate geometry of a stable, four-way DNA junction has been determined in free solution by applying the technique of transient electric birefringence. The current approach consists of (i) construction of a set of six molecules in which two of the four arms of a synthetic junction are elongated by approximately 9-fold (in each of the six possible two-arm combinations), (ii) determination of the ratios of the longest birefringence decay time of each elongated junction to the decay time of a linear control molecule, and (iii) comparison of the experimental ratios with corresponding ratios computed as a function of the junction interarm angle. The result is a set of six angles that define the geometry of the junction. In the presence of magnesium ions, the junction adopts a geometry in which particular pairs of arms approach colinearity. Furthermore, the geometry of the junction is significantly altered in the absence of magnesium, adopting a more uniform structure, although such an effect is not apparent on gels. The application of transient electric birefringence, as described in the current study, should be useful for the characterization of a broad range of tertiary structures in both DNA and RNA.

Full text

PDF
7336

Images in this article

7338Image
on p.7338

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Broker T. R., Lehman I. R. Branched DNA molecules: intermediates in T4 recombination. J Mol Biol. 1971 Aug 28;60(1):131–149. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(71)90453-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chen J. H., Churchill M. E., Tullius T. D., Kallenbach N. R., Seeman N. C. Construction and analysis of monomobile DNA junctions. Biochemistry. 1988 Aug 9;27(16):6032–6038. doi: 10.1021/bi00416a031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Churchill M. E., Tullius T. D., Kallenbach N. R., Seeman N. C. A Holliday recombination intermediate is twofold symmetric. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Jul;85(13):4653–4656. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.13.4653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cooper J. P., Hagerman P. J. Gel electrophoretic analysis of the geometry of a DNA four-way junction. J Mol Biol. 1987 Dec 20;198(4):711–719. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90212-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dickie P., McFadden G., Morgan A. R. The site-specific cleavage of synthetic Holliday junction analogs and related branched DNA structures by bacteriophage T7 endonuclease I. J Biol Chem. 1987 Oct 25;262(30):14826–14836. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Diekmann S., Wang J. C. On the sequence determinants and flexibility of the kinetoplast DNA fragment with abnormal gel electrophoretic mobilities. J Mol Biol. 1985 Nov 5;186(1):1–11. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90251-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Duckett D. R., Murchie A. I., Diekmann S., von Kitzing E., Kemper B., Lilley D. M. The structure of the Holliday junction, and its resolution. Cell. 1988 Oct 7;55(1):79–89. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90011-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hagerman P. J. Application of transient electric birefringence to the study of biopolymer structure. Methods Enzymol. 1985;117:198–219. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(85)17015-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hagerman P. J. Evidence for the existence of stable curvature of DNA in solution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Aug;81(15):4632–4636. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.15.4632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hagerman P. J. Investigation of the flexibility of DNA using transient electric birefringence. Biopolymers. 1981 Jul;20(7):1503–1535. doi: 10.1002/bip.1981.360200710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lilley D. M., Kemper B. Cruciform-resolvase interactions in supercoiled DNA. Cell. 1984 Feb;36(2):413–422. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90234-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Meselson M. S., Radding C. M. A general model for genetic recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Jan;72(1):358–361. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.1.358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mizuuchi K., Kemper B., Hays J., Weisberg R. A. T4 endonuclease VII cleaves holliday structures. Cell. 1982 Jun;29(2):357–365. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90152-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mueller J. E., Kemper B., Cunningham R. P., Kallenbach N. R., Seeman N. C. T4 endonuclease VII cleaves the crossover strands of Holliday junction analogs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Dec;85(24):9441–9445. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.24.9441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Parsons C. A., West S. C. Resolution of model Holliday junctions by yeast endonuclease is dependent upon homologous DNA sequences. Cell. 1988 Feb 26;52(4):621–629. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90474-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Seeman N. C., Kallenbach N. R. Design of immobile nucleic acid junctions. Biophys J. 1983 Nov;44(2):201–209. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(83)84292-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Seeman N. C. Nucleic acid junctions and lattices. J Theor Biol. 1982 Nov 21;99(2):237–247. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(82)90002-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sigal N., Alberts B. Genetic recombination: the nature of a crossed strand-exchange between two homologous DNA molecules. J Mol Biol. 1972 Nov 28;71(3):789–793. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(72)80039-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Symington L. S., Kolodner R. Partial purification of an enzyme from Saccharomyces cerevisiae that cleaves Holliday junctions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Nov;82(21):7247–7251. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.21.7247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Taylor W. H., Hagerman P. J. A general method for cloning DNA fragments in multiple copies. Gene. 1987;53(2-3):139–144. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(87)90001-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wemmer D. E., Wand A. J., Seeman N. C., Kallenbach N. R. NMR analysis of DNA junctions: imino proton NMR studies of individual arms and intact junction. Biochemistry. 1985 Oct 8;24(21):5745–5749. doi: 10.1021/bi00342a009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. West S. C., Körner A. Cleavage of cruciform DNA structures by an activity from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Oct;82(19):6445–6449. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.19.6445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wu H. M., Crothers D. M. The locus of sequence-directed and protein-induced DNA bending. Nature. 1984 Apr 5;308(5959):509–513. doi: 10.1038/308509a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. de Massy B., Studier F. W., Dorgai L., Appelbaum E., Weisberg R. A. Enzymes and sites of genetic recombination: studies with gene-3 endonuclease of phage T7 and with site-affinity mutants of phage lambda. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1984;49:715–726. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1984.049.01.081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES