Abstract
The conversion of glass to a hydroxyapatite (HA) material in an aqueous phosphate solution is used as an indication of the bioactive potential of the glass, as well as a low temperature route for preparing biologically useful materials. In this work, the effect of varying concentrations of pyrophosphate ions in the phosphate solution on the conversion of a calcium–lithium–borate glass to HA was investigated. Particles of the glass (150–355 µm) were immersed for up to 28 days in 0.25 M K2HPO4 solution containing 0–0.1 M K4P2O7. The kinetics of degradation of the glass particles and their conversion to HA were monitored by measuring the weight loss of the particles and the ionic concentration of the solution. The structure and composition of the conversion products were analyzed using X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. For K4P2O7 concentrations of up to 0.01 M, the glass particles converted to HA, but the time for complete conversion increased from 2 days (no K4P2O7) to 10 days (0.01 M K4P2O7). When the K4P2O7 concentration was increased to 0.1 M, the product consisted of an amorphous calcium phosphate material, which eventually crystallized to a pyrophosphate product (predominantly K2CaP2O7 and Ca2P2O7). The consequences of the results for the formation of HA materials and devices by the glass conversion route are discussed.
1 Introduction
Bioactive glasses have attractive properties for biomedical applications [1–3]. When placed in an aqueous phosphate solution, such as the body fluid, bioactive glasses undergo specific surface reactions, leading to the formation of a hydroxyapatite (HA)-type surface layer that is responsible for developing a firm bond with hard and soft tissues [4–6]. The conversion of a bioactive glass (or glass–ceramic) to HA in vitro, when immersed in an aqueous phosphate solution such as a simulated body fluid (SBF), provides a measure of its bioactive potential in vivo [7]. Therefore, it is important to understand the factors that influence the conversion of bioactive glass to HA in vitro.
The conversion of bioactive glass to HA in an aqueous phosphate solution is also of interest because the method can be used as a low temperature route for the formation of biologically useful materials, such as hollow or porous HA microspheres [8–11]. CaO-containing alkali-borate glass with special compositions in the system Li2O–CaO–B2O3 or Na2O–CaO–B2O3 have been observed to convert rapidly to HA when placed in an aqueous phosphate solution near room temperature, such as the body temperature, 37°C [8, 12]. Porous or hollow HA microspheres prepared by this route have a mesoporous structure of nanosized particles and high surface area (100–200 m2/g). As such, the glass conversion method provides a novel route for the production of biologically active HA materials and devices for biomedical applications which cannot be obtained by other known methods.
The conversion of silicate and borate bioactive glass to HA in an aqueous phosphate solution has been the subject of several studies [1, 13–16]. It is well established that an initial step in the conversion of silicate bioactive glass (such as 45S5 and 13–93 glass) to HA is the formation of a SiO2-rich gel layer on the glass surface by ion exchange reactions. Dissolution of Ca2+ ions from the glass, their diffusion through the SiO2-rich layer, and reaction with (PO4)3− ions from the solution, leads to the precipitation of an amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP) layer on the SiO2-rich layer, which subsequently converts to HA. The reaction interface moves inward with time. Because of their lower chemical durability, some borate glasses convert faster and more completely to HA than silicate 45S5 or 13–93 glass. The mechanism of converting borate bioactive glass to HA is similar to that for silicate bioactive glass, but without the formation of a SiO2-rich layer [14, 15].
In addition to factors such as glass composition, reaction temperature, and concentration of the aqueous phosphate solution, the conversion of silicate bioactive glass (13–93) to HA has also been shown to depend on the presence of polyanions in the aqueous phosphate solution [17]. In particular, the conversion rate of 13–93 glass in 0.25 M K2HPO4 solution was found to increase linearly with alginic acid concentration in the range 0–1 wt% alginic acid (based on the dry mass of the glass). At a given alginic acid concentration, the conversion rate increased almost six times when compared to that for the reaction without alginic acid. The acceleration of the conversion rate was explained in terms of chelation of the electron donating moieties of alginic acid, such as carboxyls and hydroxyls, to the leached Ca2+ from the glass.
Inorganic phosphates such as dipotassium phosphate, K2HPO4, used for preparing the aqueous phosphate solution in the glass conversion process often contain varying concentrations of other phosphates resulting from incomplete purification. In particular, tetrapotassium pyrophosphate, K4P2O7, is a common ‘impurity’ in commercial K2HPO4. Although the specific charge (charge per unit anion group) of the (P2O7)4− anion is the same as that for the (HPO4)2− anion, the higher molecular weight could result in preferential adsorption at the reaction interface. This could result in a modification of the rate of formation of HA by the glass conversion method, or in the formation of new phases based on calcium pyrophosphate.
The objective of this work was to study the effect of varying concentrations of K4P2O7 on the conversion of calcium–lithium–borate glass particles to HA in K2HPO4 solution (0.25 M). The kinetics of conversion were monitored by measuring the weight loss of the glass particles and the concentration of ions dissolved from the glass into the aqueous phosphate solution. The structure and composition of the solid conversion products were analyzed using X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
2 Experimental procedure
2.1 Conversion of calcium–lithium–borate glass particles in aqueous phosphate solution
Borate glass, with the composition (wt%): 15CaO, 10.63Li2O, 74.37 B2O3, designated CaLB3–15, was prepared by melting Reagent grade CaCO3, Li2 CO3 and H3BO3 (Alfa Aesar, Haverhill, MA, USA) in a Pt crucible for 1 h at 1200°C, and quenching the melt between cold stainless steel plates. This glass composition was used because previous work had shown that particles of the glass could be converted rapidly (within 2 days) to a HA-type material in an aqueous phosphate solution [11]. Particles of size 150–355 µm were obtained by grinding the glass in a hardened steel mortar and pestle, and sieving through 45 and 100 mesh sieves. The particles were washed three times with ethanol prior to being used in the conversion reaction.
Conversion of the borate glass particles to HA was studied in 0.25 M K2HPO4 solution containing 0–0.1 M K4P2O7 (compositions and reaction times shown in Table 1). The K2HPO4 solution was used as the parent solution for the conversion reaction because it had been used previously in several studies [14–16]. The solutions were prepared by dissolving 0.25 mol of K2HPO4·3H2O (99+%; Acros Organics, Morris Plains, NJ, USA) in 1 l distilled water, and then dissolving the required amount of K4P2O7 (98%; Acros Organics). The pH of the as-prepared solutions was 9.0.
Table 1.
Composition of K2HPO4 solutions with varying K4P2O7 concentration used in these experiments for converting calcium–lithium–borate (CaLB3–15) glass particles to a calcium phosphate material
| K2HPO4 (M) | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| K4P2O7 (M) | 0 | 0.001 | 0.01 | 0.1 |
| Reaction time (h) | 72 | 96 | 240 | 672 |
The total reaction time for each composition is also shown
In the conversion reaction, 1 g glass particles was placed in a bag consisting of nylon sieve cloth (140 mesh; nominal opening = 106 µm), and immersed in the aqueous phosphate solution. Each bag of particles was placed in a sealed polyethylene bottle containing 100 ml solution and kept at 37°C for up to 28 days (Table 1). After selected immersion times, the particles were removed from the solution, rinsed twice with distilled water, then twice with anhydrous ethanol, and dried at 90°C. For each immersion time, the weight loss was determined from three samples.
2.2 Evaluation of conversion kinetics
Measurement of the weight loss of the borate glass particles as a function of immersion time in the phosphate solution was used to monitor the conversion kinetics of the particles to HA, as described previously [14–16]. The weight loss is defined as ΔW/Wo = (Wo – W)/Wo, where Wo is the initial mass of the particles (prior to immersion) and W is the mass after time t. Since the conversion of the calcium–lithium–borate glass to HA is also accompanied by dissolution of ions such as Li+ and (BO3)3−, the concentration of Li and B in the phosphate solution as a function of immersion time was also used to evaluate the conversion process. The concentration of Ca, B, Li and P in the phosphate solution was measured using inductively-coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) at a commercial laboratory (Research Analytical Lab, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA).
2.3 Characterization of conversion products
The phase composition and microstructure of the solid products of the conversion reaction were analyzed using XRD and SEM. XRD was performed using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.15406 nm) at a scan rate of 1.8°/min in the 2θ range 5–70° (D/mas 2550 v; Rigaku; The Woodlands, TX, USA). The conversion product was ground to a powder for the XRD analysis. The microstructure of the external surface of the product was observed using SEM (S-4700; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan), at an accelerating voltage of 10 kV and working distance of 12 mm. Composition analysis of the conversion product was performed using FTIR spectroscopy (NEXUS 670 FTIR; Thermo Nicolet; Madison, WI, USA) in the wavenumber range 400–4000 cm−1 (resolution = 8 cm−1). A mass of 2 mg of the product was ground into a powder, mixed with 198 mg KBr, and pressed to form pellets for the FTIR analysis.
3 Results
3.1 Structure and composition of conversion products
XRD patterns of the starting glass (CaLB3–15) and the products formed by reacting the glass particles in 0.25 M K2HPO4 solution with varying concentration of K4P2O7 at 37°C and pH = 9.0 are shown in Fig. 1. The starting glass had a diffraction pattern with no identifiable peaks, typical of an amorphous glass. (A small peak at ~13° 2θ is due to the instrument). For the conversion products formed by reacting the glass particles in the K2HPO4 solution (without K4P2O7) and in the K2HPO4 solution containing 0.001 M and 0.01 M K4P2O7, the XRD patterns showed diffraction peaks corresponding to those of a reference HA (JCPDS 72–1243). The peaks in the XRD patterns appeared to be broad, which might indicate that the conversion products were poorly crystallized, or consisted of nanometer-sized crystals, or a combination of both.
Fig. 1.
XRD patterns of the starting calcium–lithium–borate (CaLB3–15) glass particles and the products formed after converting the glass particles for the times shown in 0.25 M K2HPO4 solution containing 0, 0.001, 0.01, and 0.1 M K4P2O7. For comparison, the pattern for a reference hydroxyapatite (JCPDS 72–1243) is also shown
In comparison, the product formed when the glass particles were reacted in the K2HPO4 solution containing 0.1 M K4P2O7 had a markedly different XRD pattern (Fig. 1). The major peaks corresponded to those of a dipotassium calcium pyrophosphate, K2CaP2O7·4H2O and a calcium pyrophosphate, Ca2P2O7·nH2O. Only minor peaks corresponding to HA were identified in the XRD pattern, indicating little formation of HA. The XRD pattern showed the presence of additional phases that could not be clearly identified.
FTIR spectra of the conversion products formed when the glass particles were reacted in the K2HPO4 solution (without K4P2O7) and in the K2HPO4 solution containing 0.001 M and 0.01 M K4P2O7 are shown in Fig. 2. The most dominant resonances were the phosphate v3 resonance, centered at ~1040 cm−1, and the phosphate v4 resonance, with peaks at ~605 and 560 cm−1, which are associated with HA [18, 19]. These FTIR spectra provided further evidence that the products formed by reacting the glass particles in these three solutions consisted of HA. Additional resonances in the spectra of these conversion products included a weak shoulder at ~962 cm−1 corresponding to the phosphate v1 resonance [20], and a resonance at ~878 cm−1 corresponding to the vibrations of CO32− ions substituting for PO43− ions in the HA lattice [20].
Fig. 2.
FTIR spectra of the starting calcium–lithium–borate (CaLB3–15) glass particles and the products formed after converting the glass particles for the times shown in 0.25 M K2HPO4 solution containing 0, 0.001, 0.01, and 0.1 M K4P2O7. The main resonances in the spectra are shown
In comparison, the FTIR spectrum of the product formed in the K2HPO4 solution containing 0.1 M K4P2O7 was markedly different from those described above. The asymmetric and symmetric terminal stretching vibrations of PO2 groups usually occur in the region 1250–980 cm−1 [21–23]. The intense band observed at 1175 cm−1 is attributed to the asymmetric P–O stretching, while the symmetric P–O stretching is located at 1109 and 1024 cm−1. The P–OH vibrations are observed at 916 cm−1 and 487 cm−1. The resonance observed at 723 cm−1 is attributed to symmetric P–O–P bridge vibration, while the resonance centered at ~580 cm−1 might be produced by the phosphate v4 and asymmetric δ PO3 vibration. Taken together, the FTIR spectrum showed that the product formed in K2HPO4 solution with 0.1 M K4P2O7 contained the function groups P2O74−, HP2O73− and PO43−, indicating the presence of a pyrophosphate, as well as a phosphate.
3.2 Reaction kinetics
Data for the weight loss, ΔW/Wo, of the glass particles as a function of immersion time in the K2HPO4 solution with or without K4P2O7 are shown in Fig. 3. The average weight loss and deviation for each immersion time were determined from three samples under the same conditions. In the K2HPO4 solution without K4P2O7, the weight loss increased rapidly with immersion time, reaching a steady, limiting value of 63% after 48 h. The presence of 0.001 M K4P2O7 in the K2HPO4 resulted in a small decrease in the ΔW/Wo value at a given immersion time, so the weight loss curve was shifted slightly to longer immersion times. For the glass particles reacted in the K2HPO4 solution containing 0.01 M K4P2O7, the weight loss data showed a marked decrease at any immersion time, when compared to the data for particles reacted in K2HPO4 solution without K4P2O7. The weight loss reached the same final limiting value (63%), but only after 200–250 h.
Fig. 3.
a Weight loss of calcium–lithium–borate (CaLB3–15) glass particles during conversion in 0.25 M K2HPO4 solution containing 0, 0.001, 0.01, and 0.1 M K4P2O7. b Weight loss curve for the glass particles during conversion in 0.25 M K2HPO4 solution containing 0.1 M K4P2O7, showing a maximum, followed by a decrease at longer times
The weight loss curve for the particles immersed in K2HPO4 solution with 0.1 M K4P2O7 showed a markedly different behavior (Fig. 3a, b). The weight loss first increased with immersion time, reaching a maximum value of 57% after an immersion time of 300–350 h, but then decreased at longer immersion times. After an immersion time of 672 h when the experiment was terminated, the final weight loss was 39%. According to XRD analysis, the product formed by reacting the particles for 336 h, corresponding to approximately the maximum on the weight loss curve, was amorphous (Fig. 4a). (A small peak at ~13° 2θ, as indicated earlier, is due to the instrument.) The FTIR spectrum of the amorphous product also showed differences from that of the final product, particularly in the wavenumber range 1000–1200 cm−1 (Fig. 4b).
Fig. 4.
(a) XRD patterns and (b) FTIR spectra of the products formed by converting calcium–lithium–borate (CaLB3–15) glass particles in 0.25 M K2HPO4 solution containing 0.1 M K4P2O7 for 14 days (336 h) and for 28 days (672 h)
Table 2 shows data for the concentration of B, Ca, Li, and P in the K2HPO4 solution (with or without K4P2O7) after different immersion times. For the K2HPO4 solution containing 0–0.01 M K4P2O7, the concentration of B and Li showed trends similar to those described earlier for the weight loss data. With increasing K4P2O7 concentration, the B and Li concentration decreased at a given immersion time, indicating a reduction in the degradation of the glass due to the presence of increasing K4P2O7 concentration in this range. However, when the K4P2O7 was increased to 0.1 M, this trend of decreasing B and Li concentrations at any given immersion time was not observed. Instead, the concentrations of B and Li at earlier emersion times (e.g., 1 day or earlier) showed an increase over those for the K2HPO4 solution containing 0.01 M K4P2O7. When the experiments were terminated after 3–28 days, presumably after completion of the conversion reaction, the B concentration in the solution was similar to the theoretical value (taken as the amount in the nominal composition of the starting glass), whereas the Li concentration was slightly less than the theoretical value. The Li/B atomic ratio in the final solution was in the range 0.180–0.188 for all four solutions.
Table 2.
Concentration of B, Ca, Li, and P in 0.25 M K2HPO4 solution containing 0, 0.001, 0.01, and 0.1 M K4P2O7 after immersion of calcium–lithium–borate (CaLB3–15) glass particles for the times shown
| B (mg/l) |
Ca (mg/l) |
Li (mg/l) |
P (mg/l) |
Theoretical concentration of P (mg/l) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 M K4P2O7 | 7750 | ||||
| 0 h | 1.3 | <0.7 | <0.1 | 7381 | |
| 1 h | 227 | 2.4 | 47.2 | 7335 | |
| 1 day | 2169 | 1.2 | 414 | 7280 | |
| 3 days | 2339 | <0.7 | 427 | 6746 | |
| 0.001 M K4P2O7 | 7810 | ||||
| 0 h | 1.7 | 0.8 | <0.1 | 7438 | |
| 1 h | 205 | 1.7 | 35.9 | 7337 | |
| 1 day | 2081 | 2.4 | 421 | 6972 | |
| 4 days | 2400 | 0.8 | 434 | 6802 | |
| 0.01 M K4P2O7 | 8370 | ||||
| 0 h | 3.8 | 1.2 | <0.1 | 8300 | |
| 1 h | 190 | 5.4 | 39.2 | 8105 | |
| 1 day | 1148 | 16.3 | 234 | 7990 | |
| 10 days | 2275 | 2.5 | 427 | 7570 | |
| 0.1 M K4P2O7 | 13950 | ||||
| 0 h | 1.5 | 1.3 | <0.1 | 13677 | |
| 1 h | 207 | 37.7 | 41.4 | 13431 | |
| 1 day | 1600 | 70.5 | 322 | 12958 | |
| 14 days | 2313 | 75.1 | 419 | 12658 | |
| 28 days | 2325 | 3.7 | 420 | 11847 | |
| Theoretical composition (in starting glass) | 2310 | 1070 | 494 | 0 |
Based on the low concentration of Ca in the K2HPO4 solution containing 0 or 0.001 M K4P2O7, it appeared that almost all the Ca2+ ions released from the glass reacted rapidly with the phosphate ions of the solution to precipitate a HA-type material. However, as the K4P2O7 increased to 0.01 and 0.1 M, the concentration of Ca2+ remaining in solution, while low, increased with increasing K4P2O7 concentration, indicating that all the Ca2+ ions did not react rapidly with the phosphate ions from the solution to precipitate a calcium phosphate material. The concentration of P in each of the four solutions decreased with increasing immersion time of the glass particles, indicating a continuous consumption of the phosphate ions from the solution in the formation of the calcium phosphate material.
3.3 Microstructure of reaction product
SEM images (Fig. 5) of the surfaces of the converted particles showed marked changes in the microstructure when compared to that of the starting glass particles. In general, the smooth surface typical of a dense glass changed to a porous particulate surface after conversion in the phosphate solution. After conversion in K2HPO4 solution containing 0 or 0.001 M K4P2O7, the surface of the product consisted of fine, plate-like (or needle-like) particles (Fig. 5a, b), typical of HA precipitated from solution [10]. An increase of the K4P2O7 concentration to 0.01 M resulted in a more equiaxial particle shape (Fig. 5c). The product formed in K2HPO4 solution containing 0.1 M K4P2O7 had a microstructure (Fig. 5d) consisting of more rounded particles, which was markedly different from that of the HA-type material formed in the K2HPO4 solution without K4P2O7 (Fig. 5a).
Fig. 5.
SEM images of the surface of the products formed by converting calcium–lithium– borate (CaLB3–15) glass particles in 0.25 M K2HPO4 solution containing (a) 0 M, (b) 0.001 M, (c) 0.01 M, and (d) 0.1 M K4P2O7 for the times shown. The inset in (a) shows an SEM image of the unreacted glass surface
4 Discussion
The results show that the presence of pyrophosphate (P2O7)4− ions in an aqueous phosphate solution (0.25 M K2HPO4) has a marked effect on the degradation of a calcium–lithium–borate glass and its conversion to a HA-type material. The degradation and conversion also appear to show a marked difference in behavior when the K4P2O7 concentration in the K2HPO4 solution increases above 0.01–0.1 M. When the K4P2O7 concentration is 0.01 M or lower, the degradation and conversion rate decreases with increasing K4P2O7 concentration, and according to XRD and FTIR, the conversion product consists of a HA-type material (Figs. 1, 2). On the other hand, for a K4P2O7 concentration of 0.1 M, the degradation rate shows a different trend (Fig. 3), and, according to XRD and FTIR, the product does not consist predominantly of a HA-type material (Figs. 1, 2). Instead, the product consists predominantly of a pyrophosphate material consisting of K2CaP2O7·4H2O and Ca2P2O7.nH2O, with only little HA.
Based on the results of previous work [8, 14], it is generally understood that upon immersion of a calcium–lithium–borate glass (e.g., CaLB3–15) in an aqueous phosphate solution (e.g., K2HPO4), Li and B dissolve to form Li+ and BO33− ions in the solution. At the same time, Ca2+ ions from the glass react with (PO4)3− ions from the solution to precipitate HA. ICP-OES data for the concentration of Li, B, and Ca in the phosphate solution (Table 2), coupled with the weight loss data for the glass particles (Fig. 3), are in general agreement with this degradation and conversion mechanism.
Upon addition of 0.001 M and 0.01 M K4P2O7 to the K2HPO4 solution, XRD and FTIR analyses show that a HA-type product is still formed. However, the ICP-OES and weight loss data show that both the degradation of the glass particles (Table 2) and the conversion to HA (Fig. 3) are markedly reduced with increasing K4P2O7 concentration. The time for complete conversion of the particles increases from ~2 days (no K4P2O7) to ~10 days (0.01 M K4P2O7). Assuming that all the CaO from the glass reacts with phosphate ions from the solution to form HA, then the theoretical weight loss is 73%. Figure 3 shows that the final, limiting weight loss of the particles in the K2HPO4 solution containing 0–0.01 M K4P2O7 is 64%. As discussed previously [9], formation of a substituted hydroxyapatite, such as the substitution of Ca2+ with K+ or (PO4)3− with (CO3)2− could account for a deviation from the theoretical value.
At lower K4P2O7 concentrations (0–0.01 M), a possible explanation for the reduction in degradation rate and conversion to HA is preferential adsorption of (P2O7)4− to the surface of the particles because of their larger molecular weight, when compared to (HPO4)2− ions. Upon immersion of the borate glass particles into the K2HPO4 solution, a calcium phosphate surface layer is presumably formed rapidly [18, 24]. Pyrophosphate ions such as (P2O7)4− and (HP2O7)3− have been reported to adsorb readily on the surfaces of HA crystals [25] and to chelate with positively charged ions such as Ca2+ [26]. In the present work, adsorption of pyrophosphate ions and chelation with the positively charged network modifiers Li+ and Ca2+ could lead to a reduction in the degradation of the glass. The adsorption of pyrophosphate ions could also lead to a reduction in the nucleation and growth of HA-type material, resulting in a reduction in the conversion to a HA-type material, as observed (Fig. 3). For each system, the Ca content of the solution (Table 2) reaches its highest value at intermediate immersion times, then it decreases at longer times. However, the Ca concentration in the solution is far smaller than the Ca content of the starting glass, indicating the Ca is essentially precipitated as a HA-type material on the particles or chelated with the (P2O7)4− ions on surface of the particles.
For the highest K4P2O7 concentration (0.1 M) in the K2HPO4 solution, the weight loss data (Fig. 3b) and the concentrations of B and Li in the solution (Table 2) show approximately similar trends up to an immersion time of 14 days: they increase with immersion time and reach their maximum values within 14 days. At longer times, the weight loss decreases, whereas the B and Li concentrations essentially show no further change. Essentially all the Li and B has dissolved out of the glass particles within 14 days. On the other hand, the Ca and P concentrations decrease markedly between 14 and 28 days, which indicate the precipitation of these two ions from the solution. As outlined earlier, according to XRD, the product formed after 14 days is amorphous (Fig. 4a), whereas it is crystalline after 28 days, consisting predominantly of K2CaP2O7·4H2O and Ca2P2O7·nH2O. A possible explanation for the behavior at this higher K4P2O7 concentration (0.1 M) is that the glass first degrades and converts to an ACP material within the first 14 days of immersion. Calcium ions are chelated with pyrophosphate (P2O7)4− ions adsorbed on the surface of the particles and in solution. Subsequently, precipitation from solution coupled with crystallization of the ACP material leads to a decrease in the weight loss and the formation of a product consisting predominantly of K2CaP2O7·4H2O and Ca2P2O7·nH2O. XRD showed the presence of additional phases that could not be clearly identified, indicating that the final product consisted of a fairly complex mixture of phases.
A schematic diagram illustrating the proposed mechanism for the conversion of the calcium–lithium–borate glass in K2HPO4 solution containing varying concentrations of pyrophosphate (P2O7)4− ions is shown in Fig. 6. In the K2HPO4 solution with no K4P2O7, degradation of the glass, coupled with reaction between Ca2+ and (PO4)3− ions leads to the formation of a HA-type material, as described previously [8, 14]. With the small additions of K4P2O7 (0.01 M or smaller) to the K2HPO4 solution, adsorption of (P2O7)4− ions (and possibly (HP2O7)3− to the surface coupled with chelation of Ca2+ ions leads to a reduction in the degradation rate of the glass and its conversion to a HA-type material. However, with higher K4P2O7 addition (0.1 M) to the K2HPO4 solution, an ACP material is formed which eventually converts to a crystalline pyrophosphate, consisting predominantly of K2CaP2O7·4H2O and Ca2P2O7·nH2O.
Fig. 6.
Schematic diagrams showing the main steps in the conversion of CaLB3–15 glass in K2HPO4 solution (0.25 M) containing (a) no K4P2O7; (b) 0–0.01 M K4P2O7; and (c) 0.1 M K4P2O7
The present results have important consequences for the use of bioactive glass in biomedical applications. Firstly, the addition of pyrophosphate ions to an aqueous phosphate solution could provide a method for controlling the degradation rate of a bioactive glass and its conversion to a HA-type material, particularly for borate glass, which has a low durability. Secondly, the presence of pyrophosphate ions in an aqueous phosphate solution should be avoided when the efficient and complete conversion of a bioactive glass to a HA-type device is required.
5 Conclusions
The conversion of calcium–lithium–borate glass particles (150–355 µm) to a HA-type material in an aqueous phosphate solution (0.25 M K2HPO4) was markedly influenced by the concentration of pyrophosphate (P2O7)4− ions in the solution. In the K2HPO4 solution containing 0–0.01 M K4P2O7, while the conversion rate to HA decreased with increasing K4P2O7 concentration, XRD and FTIR showed that the fully converted particles consisted of an HA-type product. At higher K4P2O7 concentration (0.1 M), the conversion rate of the particles also decreased, but the product did not consist of an HA-type material. Instead, the product consisted predominantly of an ACP material which eventually crystallized to a pyrophosphate product, consisting predominantly of K2CaP2O7·4H2O and Ca2P2O7·nH2O. The results show the potential of pyrophosphate ions for influencing the conversion of a bioactive glass to HA in an aqueous phosphate solution, as well as the ability to produce a calcium pyrophosphate product predominantly by reacting a calcium–lithium–borate glass in a phosphate solution containing a sufficient concentration of pyrophosphate ions.
Contributor Information
Hailuo Fu, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, and Center for Bone and Tissue Repair and Regeneration, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409, USA.
Mohamed N. Rahaman, Email: rahaman@mst.edu, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, and Center for Bone and Tissue Repair and Regeneration, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409, USA.
Delbert E. Day, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, and Center for Bone and Tissue Repair and Regeneration, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409, USA
Wenhai Huang, Institute of Bioengineering and Information Technology Materials, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China.
References
- 1.Hench LL. Bioceramics. J Am Ceram Soc. 1998;81:1705–1728. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rahaman MN, Brown RF, Bal BS, Day DE. Bioactive glasses for nonbearing applications in total joint replacement. Semin Arthroplasty. 2006;17:102–112. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jones JR, Gentleman E, Polak J. Bioactive glass scaffolds for bone regeneration. Elements. 2007;3:393–399. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hench LL, Splinter RJ, Allen WC, Greenlee TK., Jr Bonding mechanisms at the interface of ceramic prosthetic materials. J Biomed Mater Res. 1971;5:117–141. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pantano CG, Clark AE, Hench LL. Multilayer corrosion films on Bioglass surfaces. J Am Ceram Soc. 1974;57:412–413. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hench LL, Wilson J. Surface-active biomaterials. Science. 1984;226:630–636. doi: 10.1126/science.6093253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ducheyne P, Qiu Q. Bioactive ceramics: the effect of surface reactivity on bone formation and bone cell function. Biomaterials. 1999;20:2287–2303. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(99)00181-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Day DE, White JE, Brown RF, McMenamin KD. Transformation of borate glasses into biologically useful materials. Glass Technol. 2003;44:75–81. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wang Q, Huang W, Wang D, Darvell BW, Day DE, Rahaman MN. Preparation of hollow hydroxyapatite microspheres. J Mater Sci: Mater Med. 2006;17:641–646. doi: 10.1007/s10856-006-9227-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Conzone SD, Day DE. Preparation and properties of porous microspheres made from borate glass. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009;88A:531–542. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.31883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fu H, Rahaman MN, Day DE. Effect of process variables on the microstructure of hollow hydroxyapatite microspheres prepared by a glass conversion process. J Am Ceram Soc. 2010 doi: 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.03833.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.03833.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Han X, Du M, Ma Y, Day DE. Evaluation of hydroxyapatite microspheres made from a borate glass to separate protein mixtures. J Mater Sci. 2008;43:5618–5625. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Huang W, Day DE, Kittiratanapiboon K, Rahaman MN. Kinetics and mechanisms of the conversion of silicate (45S5), borate, and borosilicate glasses to hydroxyapatite in dilute phosphate solutions. J Mater Sci: Mater Med. 2006;17:583–596. doi: 10.1007/s10856-006-9220-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Huang W, Rahaman MN, Day DE, Li Y. Mechanisms of converting silicate. borate, and borosilicate glasses to hydroxyapatite in dilute phosphate solutions. Phys Chem Glasses: Eur J Glass Sci Technol B. 2006;47:647–658. doi: 10.1007/s10856-006-9220-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Huang W, Day DE, Rahaman MN. Comparison of the formation of calcium and barium phosphates by the conversion of borate glass in dilute phosphate solution at near room temperature. J Am Ceram Soc. 2007;90:838–844. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yao A, Wang D, Huang W, Fu Q, Rahaman MN, Day DE. In vitro bioactive characteristics of borate-based glasses with controllable degradation behavior. J Am Ceram Soc. 2007;90:303–306. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fu Q, Rahaman MN, Day DE. Accelerated conversion of silicate bioactive glass (13–93) to hydroxyapatite in aqueous phosphate solution containing polyanions. J Am Ceram Soc. 2009;92:2870–2876. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Clark AE, Hench LL. Early stages of calcium-phosphate layer formation in bioglass. J Non-Cryst Solids. 1989;113:195–202. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Filgueiras MR, LaTorre G, Hench LL. Solution effects on the surface reaction of a bioactive glass. J Biomed Mater Res. 1993;27:445–453. doi: 10.1002/jbm.820270405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Rehman I, Bonfield W. Characterization of hydroxyapatite and carbonated apatite by photo acoustic FTIR spectroscopy. J Mater Sci: Mater Med. 1997;8:1–4. doi: 10.1023/a:1018570213546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Harcharras M, Ennaciri A, Assaaoudi H. Vibrational spectra of double diphosphates M2SrP2O7 (M = Li, Na, K, Rb, Cs) J Can Anal Sci Spectrosc. 2001;46:83–88. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Harcharras M, Ennaciri A, Rulmont A, Gilbert B. Vibrational spectra and structures of double diphosphates M2CdP2O7 (M = Li, Na, K, Rb, Cs) Spectrochim Acta. 1997;A53:345–352. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sarr O, Diop L. The vibrational spectra of the crystalline tripotassium hydrogen pyrophosphates K3HP2O7·3H2O and K3HP2O7. Spectrochim Acta. 1984;A40:1011–1015. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Li Y, Rahaman MN, Bal BS, Day DE, Fu Q. Early stages of calcium phosphate formation on bioactive borosilicate glass in aqueous phosphate solution. J Am Ceram Soc. 2008;91:1528–1533. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Christoffersen J, Christoffersen MR. Kinetics of dissolution of calcium hydroxyapatite: IV. The effect of some biologically important inhibitors. J. Crys Growth. 1981;53:42–54. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Christoffersen MR, Balic-Zunic T, Pehrson S, Christoffersen J. Kinetics of growth of triclinic calcium pyrophosphate dehydrate crystals. Cryst Growth Des. 2001;1:463–466. [Google Scholar]






