Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Eugenics Review logoLink to The Eugenics Review
. 1966 Sep;58(3):122–135.

Galtonian eugenics and the study of growth: the relation of body size, intelligence test score, and social circumstances in children and adults.

J M Tanner
PMCID: PMC2982386  PMID: 5913725

Full text

PDF
122

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BAYLEY N. Individual patterns of development. Child Dev. 1956 Mar;27(1):45–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1956.tb04793.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BERRY W. T., COWIN P. J. Conditions associated with the growth of boys, 1950-1. Br Med J. 1954 Apr 10;1(4866):847–851. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.4866.847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boas F. ON DR. WILLIAM TOWNSEND PORTER'S INVESTIGATION OF THE GROWTH OF THE SCHOOL CHILDREN OF ST. LOUIS. Science. 1895 Mar 1;1(9):225–230. doi: 10.1126/science.1.9.225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. DOUGLAS J. W., ROSS J. M., SIMPSON H. R. THE RELATION BETWEEN HEIGHT AND MEASURED EDUCATIONAL ABILITY IN SCHOOL CHILDREN OF THE SAME SOCIAL CLASS, FAMILY SIZE AND STAGE OF SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT. Hum Biol. 1965 May;37:178–186. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DOUGLAS J. W., SIMPSON H. R. HEIGHT IN RELATION TO PUBERTY FAMILY SIZE AND SOCIAL CLASS. A LONGITUDINAL STUDY. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1964 Jul;42:20–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. GRAFFAR M., ASIEL M., EMERY-HAUZEUR C. [Height and cephalic perimetry during the first year of life]. Acta Paediatr Belg. 1961;15:61–74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. GRANT M. W. RATE OF GROWTH IN RELATION TO BIRTH RANK AND FAMILY SIZE. Br J Prev Soc Med. 1964 Jan;18:35–42. doi: 10.1136/jech.18.1.35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Illsley R. Preventive medicine in the perinatal period. Early prediction of perinatal risk. Proc R Soc Med. 1966 Mar;59(3):181–184. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. LAYCOCK F., CAYLOR J. S. PHYSIQUES OF GIFTED CHILDREN AND THEIR LESS GIFTED SIBLINGS. Child Dev. 1964 Mar;35:63–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1964.tb05918.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lee J. A. Regional variations in intellectual ability in Britain. Eugen Rev. 1957 Apr;49(1):19–24. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. MORRIS J. N., HEADY J. A. V. Mortality in relation to the father's occupation; 1911-1950. Lancet. 1955 Mar 12;268(6863):554–560. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(55)91237-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mosier H. D., Jr, Grossman H. J., Dingman H. F. Physical growth in mental defectives. A study in an institutionalized population. Pediatrics. 1965 Sep;36(3 Suppl):465–519. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. PARNELL R. W. The physique of Oxford undergraduates; relationship with weight variation, schooling and habits. J Hyg (Lond) 1954 Sep;52(3):369–378. doi: 10.1017/s002217240002756x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. SCOTT J. A. Intelligence, physique, and family size. Br J Prev Soc Med. 1962 Oct;16:165–173. doi: 10.1136/jech.16.4.165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Vernon P. E. Recent investigations of intelligence and its measurement. Eugen Rev. 1951 Oct;43(3):125–137. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Eugenics Review are provided here courtesy of The Galton Institute

RESOURCES