Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychophysiology. 2011 Apr;48(4):532–546. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01085.x

Table 1.

Stimulus type Valence judgment RT (ms) Recognition response type (hit rate)
Remember old Know old Guess old New
Targets
1st Presentation (new)
 Related prime 692 (55) .03 (.01) .03 (.01) .07 (.02) .87 (.03)
 Unrelated prime 697 (76) .03 (.01) .03 (.01) .06 (.02) .88 (.03)
2nd Presentation (old)
 Related prime 691 (56) .57 (.07) .21 (.04) .09 (.02) .13 (.02)
 Unrelated prime 702 (58) .57 (.07) .23 (.04) .08 (.03) .12 (.03)
Primes
1st Target presentation
 Related target 703 (57) .02 (.01) .02 (.01) .06 (.02) .90 (.03)
 Unrelated target 675 (55) .02 (.01) .02 (.01) .05 (.02) .91 (.03)
2nd Target presentation
 Related target 682 (57) .05 (.01) .05 (.01) .09 (.02) .81 (.04)
 Unrelated target 660 (58) .02 (.01) .03 (.01) .08 (.03) .87 (.03)

Provided for each stimulus type is the mean valence judgment response time (RT) and the mean hit rate for each recognition response type. Targets are classified according to old/new status and according to whether the target was preceded be a semantically related or unrelated prime (Figure 1). Primes are classified according to the old/new status of the immediately following target and by the semantic relatedness to the target. No primes were repeated (all were “new”). Parentheses indicate SEM.