Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2010 Sep 25;66(Pt 10):m1301. doi: 10.1107/S1600536810036913

catena-Poly[[[dipyridine­copper(II)]-μ-2,3,5,6-tetra­methyl­benzene-1,4-di­carboxyl­ato] monohydrate]

Xiaoqin Hu a,*
PMCID: PMC2983187  PMID: 21587440

Abstract

In the title complex, {[Cu(C12H12O4)(C5H5N)2]·H2O}n, the CuII ion lies on an inversion center and is coordinated by two O atoms from two 2,3,5,6-tetra­methyl­benzene-1,4-dicarboxyl­ate (TBDC) ligands and two N atoms from two pyridine ligands in a slightly distorted square-planar environment. The TBDC ligands act as bridging ligands, forming chains along [110]. These chains are further linked into a two-dimensional network via inter­molecular O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. The solvent water mol­ecule lies on a twofold rotation axis.

Related literature

For related structures, see: Chun et al. (2005); Diniz et al. (2002).graphic file with name e-66-m1301-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • [Cu(C12H12O4)(C5H5N)2]·H2O

  • M r = 459.98

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 13.3280 (8) Å

  • b = 17.1434 (11) Å

  • c = 10.7390 (7) Å

  • β = 108.481 (1)°

  • V = 2327.2 (3) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.97 mm−1

  • T = 298 K

  • 0.15 × 0.10 × 0.08 mm

Data collection

  • Bruker SMART CCD diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) T min = 0.868, T max = 0.926

  • 6747 measured reflections

  • 2594 independent reflections

  • 2283 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.017

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.029

  • wR(F 2) = 0.086

  • S = 1.06

  • 2594 reflections

  • 142 parameters

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 0.34 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.31 e Å−3

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2007); cell refinement: SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2007); data reduction: SAINT-Plus; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008) and PLATON (Spek, 2009); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810036913/lh5099sup1.cif

e-66-m1301-sup1.cif (16.4KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810036913/lh5099Isup2.hkl

e-66-m1301-Isup2.hkl (127.5KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O01—H1A⋯O1 0.92 (3) 1.93 (3) 2.854 (2) 173 (3)

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful for funding support from the Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province (2007011033).

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

The title compound (I), was designed as a ligand for preparing MOF materials and its single-crystal is presented herein. Some crystal structures containing TBDC and 1,2,4,5-benzenetetracarboxylate as ligands have already appeared in the literature (Chun et al., 2005; Diniz et al., 2002). The asymmetric unit (labeled in Fig. 1) contains one half copper ion, one pyridine ligand, one half solvent water molecule and half of a TBDC ligand (Fig 1.). The CuII ion lies on an inversion center and is coordinated by two oxygen atoms from two TBDC ligands and two nitrogen atoms from two pyridine ligands in a slightly distorted square-planar environment. The TBDC ligands act as bridiging to form one-dimensional chains along [110] (Fig 2.). These chains are further linked into a two-dimensional network via intermolecular O-H···O hydrogen bonds (Fig. 3).

Experimental

A mixture of Cu(NO3)2(20 mg, 0.08 mmol),H2TBDC (10 mg,0.05 mmol) and two drops of pyridine was suspended in 15 ml water and heated in a teflon-lined steel bomb at 100 centigrade degree for 3 days. The block blue crystals of the title compound were obtained, washed with water and dried in the air.

Refinement

H atoms bonded to C atoms were placed in calculated positions with C-H = 0.93-0.96Å and included in the refinement with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C) or 1.5Ueq(C) for methyl H atoms. The unique H atom of the water molecule was refined indpendently with an isotropic displacement parameter. Since our goal was to prepare a porous material the solvent accessible voids of 138.00Å3 present in the structure might be expected.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

View of the coordination around the CuII ion in the title compound. Probabilty ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% level. Only the atoms of the asymmetric unit are labeled.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Part of the one-dimensional chain of the title compound.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Part of the crystal structure of the title compound with hydrogen bonds shown as dashed lines. Only H atoms involved in hydrogen bonds are showm.

Crystal data

[Cu(C12H12O4)(C5H5N)2]·H2O F(000) = 956
Mr = 459.98 Dx = 1.313 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/c Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2yc Cell parameters from 3713 reflections
a = 13.3280 (8) Å θ = 2.4–27.5°
b = 17.1434 (11) Å µ = 0.97 mm1
c = 10.7390 (7) Å T = 298 K
β = 108.481 (1)° Block, blue
V = 2327.2 (3) Å3 0.15 × 0.10 × 0.08 mm
Z = 4

Data collection

Bruker SMART CCD diffractometer 2594 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 2283 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphite Rint = 0.017
φ and ω scans θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 2.4°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADBAS; Sheldrick, 1996) h = −17→10
Tmin = 0.868, Tmax = 0.926 k = −19→21
6747 measured reflections l = −10→13

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.029 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.086 H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.06 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0467P)2 + 1.775P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2594 reflections (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
142 parameters Δρmax = 0.34 e Å3
0 restraints Δρmin = −0.31 e Å3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Cu1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.02763 (11)
O2 0.07772 (9) 0.07930 (7) −0.06903 (12) 0.0326 (3)
N1 −0.12716 (11) 0.06855 (8) −0.04454 (14) 0.0313 (3)
O1 0.10913 (11) 0.10867 (8) 0.14011 (13) 0.0418 (3)
C1 0.12054 (13) 0.12134 (9) 0.03160 (17) 0.0294 (3)
C2 0.18792 (13) 0.18884 (9) 0.01433 (16) 0.0289 (3)
C3 0.13967 (13) 0.25988 (10) −0.03235 (17) 0.0312 (4)
C5 0.29738 (13) 0.17762 (10) 0.04732 (17) 0.0315 (4)
C11 −0.17376 (16) 0.08364 (12) 0.0463 (2) 0.0416 (4)
H11 −0.1455 0.0619 0.1294 0.050*
C7 −0.16747 (16) 0.10076 (13) −0.1635 (2) 0.0451 (5)
H7 −0.1352 0.0910 −0.2270 0.054*
C4 0.02162 (15) 0.26957 (12) −0.0624 (2) 0.0474 (5)
H4A −0.0085 0.2213 −0.0462 0.071*
H4B −0.0097 0.2840 −0.1528 0.071*
H4C 0.0081 0.3096 −0.0073 0.071*
C6 0.34512 (16) 0.09915 (12) 0.0956 (3) 0.0512 (5)
H6A 0.2904 0.0640 0.1001 0.077*
H6B 0.3961 0.1048 0.1813 0.077*
H6C 0.3793 0.0788 0.0361 0.077*
C9 −0.3036 (2) 0.16249 (18) −0.1002 (3) 0.0691 (7)
H9 −0.3636 0.1938 −0.1193 0.083*
C10 −0.2619 (2) 0.13013 (15) 0.0210 (3) 0.0598 (6)
H10 −0.2928 0.1394 0.0861 0.072*
C8 −0.2556 (2) 0.14817 (16) −0.1942 (2) 0.0634 (7)
H8 −0.2823 0.1702 −0.2774 0.076*
O01 0.0000 0.21858 (15) 0.2500 0.0601 (6)
H1A 0.040 (2) 0.1861 (19) 0.216 (3) 0.094 (11)*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Cu1 0.02676 (16) 0.02207 (16) 0.03625 (18) −0.00754 (10) 0.01309 (12) 0.00071 (10)
O2 0.0348 (6) 0.0276 (6) 0.0381 (7) −0.0120 (5) 0.0153 (5) −0.0013 (5)
N1 0.0316 (7) 0.0265 (7) 0.0372 (8) −0.0057 (6) 0.0128 (6) −0.0004 (6)
O1 0.0521 (8) 0.0389 (7) 0.0396 (7) −0.0136 (6) 0.0222 (6) 0.0006 (6)
C1 0.0286 (8) 0.0235 (8) 0.0385 (9) −0.0048 (6) 0.0140 (7) 0.0024 (6)
C2 0.0308 (8) 0.0242 (8) 0.0332 (8) −0.0089 (6) 0.0121 (6) −0.0012 (6)
C3 0.0280 (8) 0.0278 (8) 0.0382 (9) −0.0059 (6) 0.0113 (7) 0.0009 (7)
C5 0.0307 (8) 0.0245 (8) 0.0400 (9) −0.0049 (6) 0.0120 (7) 0.0023 (7)
C11 0.0478 (11) 0.0397 (10) 0.0400 (10) 0.0014 (8) 0.0180 (8) 0.0000 (8)
C7 0.0462 (11) 0.0508 (12) 0.0397 (10) 0.0010 (9) 0.0154 (8) 0.0041 (9)
C4 0.0315 (9) 0.0413 (11) 0.0705 (14) −0.0024 (8) 0.0178 (9) 0.0140 (10)
C6 0.0395 (10) 0.0303 (10) 0.0824 (16) −0.0018 (8) 0.0175 (10) 0.0143 (10)
C9 0.0547 (14) 0.0729 (18) 0.0800 (18) 0.0285 (13) 0.0219 (13) 0.0116 (14)
C10 0.0622 (14) 0.0614 (15) 0.0669 (15) 0.0164 (12) 0.0364 (12) 0.0021 (12)
C8 0.0574 (14) 0.0753 (17) 0.0524 (13) 0.0182 (12) 0.0102 (11) 0.0181 (12)
O01 0.0687 (16) 0.0490 (14) 0.0683 (15) 0.000 0.0296 (13) 0.000

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

Cu1—O2 1.9894 (11) C11—H11 0.9300
Cu1—O2i 1.9894 (11) C7—C8 1.380 (3)
Cu1—N1 1.9920 (15) C7—H7 0.9300
Cu1—N1i 1.9921 (15) C4—H4A 0.9600
O2—C1 1.273 (2) C4—H4B 0.9600
N1—C11 1.337 (2) C4—H4C 0.9600
N1—C7 1.338 (3) C6—H6A 0.9600
O1—C1 1.241 (2) C6—H6B 0.9600
C1—C2 1.512 (2) C6—H6C 0.9600
C2—C3 1.394 (2) C9—C10 1.361 (4)
C2—C5 1.401 (2) C9—C8 1.377 (4)
C3—C5ii 1.401 (2) C9—H9 0.9300
C3—C4 1.512 (2) C10—H10 0.9300
C5—C3ii 1.401 (2) C8—H8 0.9300
C5—C6 1.508 (3) O01—H1A 0.92 (3)
C11—C10 1.374 (3)
O2—Cu1—O2i 180.00 (6) N1—C7—C8 121.7 (2)
O2—Cu1—N1 90.64 (5) N1—C7—H7 119.1
O2i—Cu1—N1 89.36 (5) C8—C7—H7 119.1
O2—Cu1—N1i 89.36 (5) C3—C4—H4A 109.5
O2i—Cu1—N1i 90.65 (5) C3—C4—H4B 109.5
N1—Cu1—N1i 180.0 H4A—C4—H4B 109.5
C1—O2—Cu1 102.52 (10) C3—C4—H4C 109.5
C11—N1—C7 118.53 (17) H4A—C4—H4C 109.5
C11—N1—Cu1 119.71 (13) H4B—C4—H4C 109.5
C7—N1—Cu1 121.76 (13) C5—C6—H6A 109.5
O1—C1—O2 122.84 (15) C5—C6—H6B 109.5
O1—C1—C2 120.22 (15) H6A—C6—H6B 109.5
O2—C1—C2 116.93 (14) C5—C6—H6C 109.5
C3—C2—C5 122.37 (14) H6A—C6—H6C 109.5
C3—C2—C1 119.25 (14) H6B—C6—H6C 109.5
C5—C2—C1 118.37 (15) C10—C9—C8 119.0 (2)
C2—C3—C5ii 118.98 (15) C10—C9—H9 120.5
C2—C3—C4 120.19 (15) C8—C9—H9 120.5
C5ii—C3—C4 120.80 (16) C9—C10—C11 119.3 (2)
C2—C5—C3ii 118.64 (15) C9—C10—H10 120.4
C2—C5—C6 120.10 (15) C11—C10—H10 120.4
C3ii—C5—C6 121.25 (16) C9—C8—C7 119.2 (2)
N1—C11—C10 122.3 (2) C9—C8—H8 120.4
N1—C11—H11 118.9 C7—C8—H8 120.4
C10—C11—H11 118.9
O2i—Cu1—O2—C1 93.10 (11) C1—C2—C3—C5ii 179.58 (16)
N1—Cu1—O2—C1 89.16 (11) C5—C2—C3—C4 −178.05 (18)
N1i—Cu1—O2—C1 −90.84 (11) C3—C2—C5—C3ii −0.2 (3)
O2—Cu1—N1—C11 −129.39 (14) C1—C2—C5—C3ii −179.59 (16)
O2i—Cu1—N1—C11 50.61 (14) C3—C2—C5—C6 −179.15 (18)
O2—Cu1—N1—C7 50.15 (15) C1—C2—C5—C6 1.5 (3)
O2i—Cu1—N1—C7 −129.85 (15) C7—N1—C11—C10 0.8 (3)
Cu1—O2—C1—O1 −0.1 (2) Cu1—N1—C11—C10 −179.66 (18)
Cu1—O2—C1—C2 179.68 (12) C11—N1—C7—C8 −0.5 (3)
O1—C1—C2—C3 −94.9 (2) Cu1—N1—C7—C8 179.92 (18)
O2—C1—C2—C3 85.3 (2) C8—C9—C10—C11 −0.5 (4)
O1—C1—C2—C5 84.5 (2) N1—C11—C10—C9 −0.3 (4)
O2—C1—C2—C5 −95.3 (2) C10—C9—C8—C7 0.7 (4)
C5—C2—C3—C5ii 0.2 (3) N1—C7—C8—C9 −0.2 (4)

Symmetry codes: (i) −x, −y, −z; (ii) −x+1/2, −y+1/2, −z.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
O01—H1A···O1 0.92 (3) 1.93 (3) 2.854 (2) 173 (3)

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: LH5099).

References

  1. Bruker (2007). SMART and SAINT-Plus Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  2. Chun, H., Dybtsev, D. N., Kim, H. & Kim, K. (2005). Chem. Eur. J.11, 3521–3529. [DOI] [PubMed]
  3. Diniz, R., de Abreu, H. A., de Almeida, W. B., Sansiviero, M. T. C. & Fernandes, N. G. (2002). Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. pp. 1115–1123.
  4. Sheldrick, G. M. (1996). SADABS University of Göttingen, Germany.
  5. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  6. Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810036913/lh5099sup1.cif

e-66-m1301-sup1.cif (16.4KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810036913/lh5099Isup2.hkl

e-66-m1301-Isup2.hkl (127.5KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES