Abstract
Background
One of the key targets in treating mitral regurgitation (MR) is reducing the otherwise progressive left ventricular (LV) remodeling which exacerbates MR and conveys adverse prognosis. We have previously demonstrated that severing two second–order chordae to the anterior mitral leaflet relieves tethering and ischemic MR acutely. The purpose of this study was to test whether this technique reduces the progression of LV remodeling in the chronic ischemic MR setting.
Methods and Results
A posterolateral MI was created in 18 sheep by obtuse marginal branch ligation. After chronic remodeling and MR development at 3 months, sheep were randomized to sham surgery (control group, n=6) versus second-order chordal cutting (n=12, half with anterior leaflet and half with bileaflet chordal cutting, both of which are techniques in clinical application). At baseline, chronic infarction (3 months), and follow-up at a mean of 6.6 months post-MI (sacrifice), we measured LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volume (EDV and ESV), ejection fraction (EF), wall motion score index (WMSi), and posterior leaflet (PL) restriction angle relative to the annulus by 2D and 3D a echo. All measurements were comparable among groups at baseline and chronic MI. At sacrifice, AntL and BiL chordal cutting limited the progressive remodeling seen in controls. LVESV increased relative to chronic MI by 109±8.7% in controls, versus 30.5±6.1% with chordal cutting (p<0.01) (LVESV=82.5±2.6ml in controls vs. 60.6±5.1ml and 61.8±4.1ml). LVEDV increased by 63±2.0% in controls vs. 26±5.5% and 22±3.4% with chordal cutting (p<0.01). LVEF and WMSi were not significantly different at follow-up among chordal cutting and control groups. MR progressively increased to moderate in controls but decreased to trace-to-mild with AntL and BiL chordal cutting (MR vena contracta 5.9±1.1mm in controls, vs. 2.6±0.1mm vs 1.7±0.1mm vs, p<0.01). BiL chordal cutting provided greater PL mobility (decreased PL restriction angle to 54.2±5.0° versus 83±3.2° with AntL chordal cutting, p<0.01).
Conclusions
Reduced leaflet tethering by chordal cutting in the chronic post-MI setting substantially decreases the progression of LV remodeling with sustained reduction of MR over a chronic follow-up. These benefits have the potential to improve clinical outcomes.
Keywords: remodeling, myocardial infarction, mitral valve-regurgitation, echocardiography
Mitral regurgitation (MR) more than doubles the risk of late death after both myocardial infarction and coronary revascularization 1,2. Post-infarction, leaflet closure is restricted by tethering to displaced papillary muscles (PMs) 3-7, with a prominent bend in the basal anterior leaflet (“seagull sign”) and markedly limited posterior leaflet motion (Carpentier functional classification Type 3b) 8-10. It is therefore incompletely treated by annular reduction, especially when preoperative posterior leaflet angulation relative to the mitral annulus is increased9,11,12.
Chordae tendinae inserting on the anterior mitral leaflet are commonly classified into two groups: finer marginal or first-order chordae that position the leaflet tips and prevent prolapse, and thicker basal, second-order strut chordae that insert symmetrically onto the central ventricular surfaces of both leaflets nearer their bases (Fig. 1)13 After inferior infarction, the PMs are displaced laterally, apically and posteriorly, pulling the leaflets down into the LV cavity, with the greatest leaflet distortion mediated by these basal chordae, leading to the recent proposal to cut a limited number of basal chordae, initially those attached to the anterior leaflet, to relieve the apical leaflet tenting and improve coaptation and MR 14,15 (Fig. 2A, left). A more comprehensive approach will also involve the basal chordae inserting on the posterior leaflet in order to improve PL mobility (Fig. 2A, right, Fig. 2B).
Figure 1. Mitral valve chordae classification.
Chordae tendinae are classified as finer marginal or first-order chordae that position the leaflet tips and prevent prolapse, and thicker basal, second-order strut chordae that insert symmetrically onto the ventricular surface of both leaflet bases.
Figure 2. Chordal cutting techniques.
2A: Left: Anterior leaflet basal chordal cutting can eliminate the anterior leaflet bend, improve coaptation, and reduce MR; the marginal chordae prevent prolapse. Right. Bileaflet chordal cutting eliminates the anterior leaflet bend and improves PL leaflet mobility with decreased PL angle relative to the annulus.
2B: Basal chordae to both anterior and posterior leaflets (AL, PL), with anterior leaflet bend indicating tethering in an echocardiographic long-axis view
Since chordae are known to preserve left ventricular (LV) - mitral continuity and function in the normal heart 16-19, some concerns have been raised regarding any possible influence of the chordal cutting technique on regional and global LV function 20. For this reason, we began with a minimal approach by severing only the two most centrally positioned basal chordae to the anterior leaflet responsible for its bend that decreases coaptation surface. This technique was effective in acute ischemic MR with a follow up of up to 11 months 14 and acutely in a chronic ischemic MR model without any negative effect on LV remodeling and function 15. We also recently demonstrated in normal ovine beating hearts the absence of negative effects of this minimal approach on segmental and global LV function evaluated invasively (elastance, preloadrecruitable stroke work, dP/dt) and noninvasively (3D LV ejection fraction (EF) and volumes, and wall motion)21. Since this technique is already being tested clinically in multiple surgical centers 22-26, it is important to test whether or not chordal cutting exacerbates long-term LV remodeling when applied to treat ischemic MR in a chronic myocardial infarction (MI), which is the purpose of this study.
We tested the minimal approach (anterior leaflet basal chordae) and a more comprehensive approach with bileaflet chordal cutting which severs all the secondary chordae to both leaflets, as in the current clinical application of David, Borger, and colleagues 23,25,26. These approaches were tested in a chronic ischemic MR sheep model with long-term follow-up using 2D, 3D and Doppler echocardiography to quantify LV remodeling and MR.
METHODS
The chronic infarction model of Llaneras et al. 27,28 produces chronic ischemic MR after 8 weeks of LV remodeling post-MI (occlusion of second and third circumflex marginals). In that model, 2D and 3D echo were repeated to evaluate LV remodeling, EF, wall motion score, mitral valve geometry and MR at three stages: acute infarction with only trace MR; chronic infarction with moderate MR, 3 months post acute MI; and at sacrifice at a mean of 6.6 months post MI or 3.6 months post chordal cutting or sham surgery (Fig. 3).
Figure 3. Study Design.
The overall study design involves repeated 3D and 2D echo to evaluate LV remodeling and MR with chronic infarction and moderate MR, and at sacrifice, 6.6 months post MI (3.6 months after intervention).
Animal Studies
Eighteen Dorsett hybrid sheep (40-50 kg) anesthetized with thiopentothal (0.5 ml/kg), intubated and ventilated at 15 ml/kg with 2% isofluorane and oxygen and given glyco-pyrrolate (0.4 mg IV) and prophylactic vancomycin (0.5 g IV) underwent sterile left thoracotomy, with procainamide (15 mg/kg IV) and lidocaine (3 mg/kg IV followed by 2 mg/min) given 10 minutes before coronary ligation. After baseline imaging, the pericardium was opened and the second and third circumflex obtuse marginal branches ligated to infarct the inferoposterior wall. Imaging was repeated and the thoracotomy closed. After a mean of 3 months, each animal had a second thoracotomy under general anesthesia to evaluate the ischemic MR due to mitral leaflet tethering at the chronic MI stage.
Sheep were then randomized into three groups:
-
-
Control group (n=6) underwent cardiopulmonary bypass and left atrial incision but without any chordal or leaflet modification.
-
-
Anterior leaflet (AntL) second-order chordal cutting group (n=6): After cardiopulmonary bypass, left atrial incision was performed and the anterior mitral leaflet everted through the annulus. All the basal chordae to the anterior leaflet were cut proximal to their leaflet insertion. After repair of the atrial incision, rewarming and defibrillation, normal circulation was restored (Fig 2A, left).
-
-
Bileaflet (BiL) second-order chordal cutting group (n=6): After cardiopulmonary bypass and left atrial incision, all the second-order chordae to the anterior leaflet were severed, as were as all the second-order chordae to the posterior leaflet after eversion of that leaflet to identify the basal chordae arising from the PMs or the posterior wall (Fig. 2A, right).
3D LV volume and MR evaluation
Thirty rotated LV apical views were acquired (5 MHz epicardial probe, Acuson Sequoia C512) with suspended respiration, as previously described and validated against sonomicrometry 5,29,30. 3D LV volumes were obtained using endocardial borders from 9 views 29. MR stroke volume was calculated as LV ejection volume minus aortic outflow volume directly measured by flowmeter 31. Regurgitant fraction was calculated as (MR stroke volume)/(forward aortic + MR stroke volumes). MR was also graded using the vena contracta width in the 2D longaxis view as the narrowest portion of the color jet at or just downstream from the regurgitant orifice. The largest diameter during systole was measured in at least 3 cardiac cycles and averaged. Vena contracta width ≤2 mm was considered trace to mild, ≥5mm as moderate, and >2mm and <5mm as mild to moderate 32-34.
2D wall motion analysis
Scoring of regional contractility
Using three short-axis views, the LV was divided into 17 segments according the American Society of Echocardiography recommendations and a score allocated to each segment according to its contractility as (0) normokinetic, (+1) hypokinetic, (+2) akinetic, or (+3) dyskinetic. A global wall motion score was derived from the algebraic sum of these values, and the wall motion score (WMS) index was obtained by dividing WMS by the total number of scored segments (n=17) 35 .
Mitral valve geometry evaluation
Mitral valve configuration was assessed in midsystole using the parasternal long-axis and apical 4 chamber views. The posterior leaflet (PL) angle reflecting restricted closure due to tethering was calculated because of its prognostic significance recently demonstrated by Magne 9 et al.:PLA=sin-1 (CD/PLL), where PLA = PL angle, CD = coaptation distance from annular line to leaflet coaptation point, and PLL = PL annulus–to–tip length.
Acquisition of digital cineloops and analysis of segmental wall motion score and MR stroke volume were performed by a single experienced operator blinded to the treatment group. Reproducibility of echocardiographic measurements was tested by two independent observers and gave a variability of 1.5% of the mean.
Statistical analysis
Echocardiographic measurements were compared among stages and sheep by 2-way ANOVA for repeated measures. Significant ANOVAs were explored by paired t-tests (chronic ischemia vs. sacrifice), with significance at p≤0.01 (Bonferroni-corrected). Differences in progression among groups were explored by unpaired t-test with significance at p<0.05. All data were reported as mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis used Stat View 7.0.
RESULTS
Experimental sheep survival rate
Twenty-one animals survived out of 33 after the initial myocardial infarction by obtuse marginal ligation. During the second surgery (extracorporeal circulation), 3 animals died out of the remaining 21: one could not be weaned from bypass and 2 others died a few days after surgery due to pericardial tamponade. The remaining 18 sheep completed the study: 6 with sham surgery and 6 each with anterior or bileaflet chordal cutting.
Progression of LV remodeling (Fig. 4, Table)
Figure 4. LV remodeling progression.
All measurements were comparable among groups at baseline and chronic MI. At sacrifice, AntL and BiL chordal cutting limited the progressive remodeling seen in controls with less increase of LVEDV (upper left) and of LVESV (upper right) but with no adverse effect on LV EF (bottom left) or WMSi (bottom right).
Table.
Echocardiographic Measurements.
| CHRONIC MI | SACRIFICE | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONTROL | ANT LEAFLET | BI LEAFLET | CONTROL | ANT LEAFLET | BI LEAFLET | |
| HEART RATE | 99±1.5 | 99.1±2.7 | 98±3.2 | 102.8±1.6 | 103.3±4.0 | 101.5±1.9 |
| LVEDV (mL) | 76±5.3 | 71±2.5 | 76±3.4 | [117.8±4.6* | 93.6±5.3* | 92.5±4.6*]Ψ |
| LVESV (mL) | 40±2.4 | 44±3.9 | 48±1.6 | [82.5±2.6* | 60.6±5.1* | 61.8±4.1*]Ψ |
| LV EF % | 37.7±2.5 | 38±4.3 | 37±0.1 | 31.8±1.5 | 36.2±1.7 | 36.3±1.4 |
| WMSi | .97±.01 | .95±0.2 | .93±0.9 | .98±.1 | .96±0.1 | 1.08±0.1 |
| PL ANGLE ° | 80±3.5 | 79±2.7 | 80.5±1.1 | [83.5±4.0 | [83±3.2 | 54.2±5.0*]#]Ψ |
| MRSV (mL/beat) | 9.6±3.2 | 9.1±1.8 | 9.2±1.2 | [12±2.4* | [7±2.0* | 5±1.4*]#]Ψ |
| MRRF % | 25±3.2 | 27±1.0 | 24±2.6 | [33.5±2.4* | [18±1.3* | 11±3.1*]#]Ψ |
| MR Vena contracta mm | 4.3±0.1 | 4.5±1.1 | 4.9±1.0 | [5.9±1.1* | [2.6±0.1* | 1.7±0.1*]#]Ψ |
LVEDV: LV end-diastolic volume. LVESV: LV end-systolic volume. WMSi: wall motion score index
PL angle: posterior leaflet angle to the mitral annulus in midsystole.
MRSV: MR stroke volume. MRRF: MR regurgitant fraction.
Significant changes p≤0.01 (Bonferroni-corrected) are indicated for the comparisons:
sacrifice vs. chronic MI
chordal cutting groups vs. control at sacrifice
bileaflet vs. anterior leaflet chordal cutting at sacrifice
At baseline, the mitral leaflets closed at the annular level with normal LV size and function and no or trace MR. With acute infarction, LV dilatation was limited, and the leaflets still closed at the annular level, with only trace MR. After mean of 3 months post infarction, however, LV volumes were considerably higher. Chronic inferior ischemia produced mild bulging of the affected wall and displaced the PM tip away from the annulus; the leaflets remained apically tented with a discrete angulated bend in the anterior leaflet between its basal portion and the rest of the leaflet, becoming convex toward the LV, and a strongly restricted PL angle relative to the mitral annulus, forming almost a right angle (80±0.05°), with mild to moderate MR. At sacrifice, a mean of 3.6±0.6 months after the mitral valve interventions, AntL and BiL chordal cutting limited the progressive remodeling seen in sham–operated controls. LVESV increased relative to the 3-month chronic MI stage by 109±8.7% in controls vs. 33±7.2% and 28±5.0% with AntL and BiL chordal cutting (p<0.01). LVEDV increased by 63±2.0% in controls vs. 26±5.5% and 22±3.4% with AntL and BiL chordal cutting (p<0.01). There were no significant differences among control and chordal cutting groups at sacrifice in LVEF or WMSi (p=0.12 and p=0.12, respectively).
MV geometry and regurgitation (Fig. 5, Table)
Figure 5. Mid-systolic apical 2D echo images.
Control, Left: Top: Leaflet apical tenting relative to the annulus with a prominent bend in the basal anterior leaflet (“seagull sign”) and markedly limited posterior leaflet motion with PL angle relative to annulus of 80°. Bottom. Moderate MR with a central jet into the left atrium. AntL chordal cutting, Center. Top: More concave anterior leaflet (toward the LV) but with still restricted motion of the posterior leaflet and PL angle of 75°, (Bottom) with trace to mild MR. BiL chordal cutting, Right. BiL chordal cutting, Top: Less LV remodeling with a decrease of PL angle to 45,° more concave anterior leaflet and no MR (Bottom).
MR progressively increased to moderate in controls but decreased to trace-mild (vena contracta ≤ 2mm) in 83% of chordal cutting sheep, with a decrease in MR regurgitant fraction from 27±1.0 % to 18±1.3 % (p<0.01) with anterior leaflet chordal cutting vs. 24±2.6% to 11±3.1% (p<0.01) for bileaflet chordal cutting. At sacrifice, the decrease of MR was more pronounced in the bileaflet vs. anterior leaflet chordal cutting group (p=0.04). This result was consistent with the greater PL mobility provided by the bileaflet chordal cutting technique (decreased PL restriction angle to 54.2±5° versus 83±3.2° with AntL chordal cutting, p<0.01). There was no prolapse or chordal rupture in either group. The severity of LV remodeling at sacrifice correlated well with the degree of MR (r2=0.83, p<0.01).
DISCUSSION
Previous results of in vitro and in vivo models of acute and chronic ischemic MR have shown that tethering and the resulting malcoaptation can be relieved by basal chordal cutting 14,15. Those studies demonstrated no adverse effect on segmental and global LV function after a follow-up of up to 11 months after chordal cutting to the anterior leaflet done at the initiation of an inferior infarction model and done acutely in a chronic ischemic MR model 14,15. To answer concerns regarding the possibility of decreased LV function and increased LV remodeling with this maneuver 20, the subsequent logical step was to determine whether or not chordal cutting exacerbates long-term LV remodeling when applied to treat chronic ischemic MR. This study demonstrates that cutting the secondary chordae in the chronic post MI setting does not adversely affect longterm LV remodeling and in fact limits the otherwise progressive increase in LV volumes without such intervention.
LV remodeling regression
The significant decrease in LV volume progression with stable EF in the two chordal cutting groups vs. the control one is consistent with the recently published data by Beeri 36,37 et al. showing that MR increases LV remodeling and volume in the post MI setting with an aggravation of the morphological, functional, cellular, and extracellular stigmata of remodeling. MR can cause as well as result from LV remodeling, and can therefore potentially exacerbate remodeling in a vicious cycle spiraling down to cardiac failure unless there is intervention; in contrast, repairing MR decreased LV remodeling progression with reduced LV volumes, better maintained contractility, and improved molecular correlates of remodeling36.
Consistent with this result, the chordal cutting group showed decreases in the LV remodeling that was otherwise progressive, with an increase of LV ESV of 33±7.2% and 28±5.0% with AntL and BiL chordal cutting vs. 109±8.7% in the control group (p<0.01). This can be explained by the decrease in MR progression, which plays a role in reducing this remodeling, although this remains an area of active research and controversy.
Stabilization of the remodeling LV is therefore not only achieved by localized patching of the infarct zone38 but also by chordal cutting to reduce ischemic MR.
Ant Leaflet vs. Bi Leaflet chordal cutting
Because post-MI LV remodeling displaces both papillary muscles (even the one which is not involved by the infarction) as the entire LV dilates we cut all the basal chordae arising from the 2 papillary muscles in the AntL chordal cutting group.
Interestingly, cutting the basal chordae to the Ant Leaflet or all the basal chordae to both leaflets does not increase LV remodeling. This could be explained by the intact marginal chordae continuing to assure mitral-LV continuity with a less taut and tethered valve which can coapt in a more normal configuration, while repairing MR in this controlled ovine model decreased LV remodeling progression, with reduced LV volumes.
This confirms the finite element experimentation by Kunzelman and Cochran 39 who noted that stress borne by marginal chordae exceeds that carried by the basal ones for any strain, with almost twice as many marginal as basal chordal insertions; and their suggestion that “it may be possible surgically to remove basal chordae without seriously compromising mitral valve function”.
Furthermore, chordal tension may in fact decrease as, over time, diminished MR stabilizes or reduces LV volume as seen in our study, and the leaflet assumes a more normal, less taut configuration (decreased leaflet radius of curvature decreasing tension by Laplace's Law). In a smaller LV, total stress may be less even if a greater proportion must be borne by remaining chords. This improved MV configuration was already apparent in prior studies on chronic ischemic MR in which the anterior leaflet bend disappeared after the two most central basal chordae to the anterior leaflet were severed 15.
As the posterior leaflet motion restriction also decreases the surface of coaptation 8,9, we compared the efficacy and safety of bileaflet chordal cutting vs. anterior leaflet alone. The results confirmed that in the case of important LV remodeling a complete section of all the basal chordae, especially the ones inserted on the posterior leaflet, increased PL mobility and decreased PL angle relative to the mitral annulus. This angle recently emerged as a strong predictor of MR persistence after MV annuloplasty and of patient 3-year prognosis 9. In this experimental study, bileaflet chordal cutting resulted in a better improvement of mitral valve configuration (especially PL angle) and a slightly more important reduction in MR without increasing LV remodeling.
This is of importance and confirmed by recent human studies performed by Borger, David 23 et al., who compared the efficacy of a full chordal cutting (arising from the ischemic papillary muscle inserted on both leaflets) + partial annuloplasty vs. partial annuloplasty alone. This study showed a significant decrease of recurrent MR at 2 years follow up (37% in annuloplasty vs 15% in chordal cutting group, p=0.03) without any decrease in the post op increase of EF (10±5% in chordal cutting vs. 11±6% in the control group; p=0.9). In that study as well as our experimental one, no late prolapse or additional chordal rupture was noticed.
Mitral regurgitation
The goal of this study was not primarily to analyze the longterm effect of chordal cutting on ischemic MR regression but rather to assure the safety of the procedure on the LV remodeling process in the perspective of ongoing clinical application of this technique.
MR progression did significantly regress in both chordal cutting groups vs. control with MR, going from moderate to trace-to-mild at 3.6 months after the MV repair. This decrease was mildly but significantly more pronounced in the bileaflet group vs ant leaflet group and correlated well with a more mobile PL, which assured better coaptation.
Limitations and future direction
The first limitation of our study is by definition that our conclusion is strictly only applicable to our chronic ischemic MR sheep model. However the MR mechanism (leaflet tethering) in our experimentation was substantially identical to that observed in clinical practice; and our results are consistent with other human studies 23,25,26 showing the absence of increase of LV remodelling after chordal cutting.
Moreover in this study and in the human study of Borger et al. 23, chordal cutting leaves still some degree of residual MR. We are therefore conducting an experimental ovine study using the same model of chronic ischemic MR to define the best strategy to completely eliminate MR completely at long-term follow up, with the association of annuloplasty and chordal cutting. The clinical spectrum of ischemic MR includes widely varying location and chronicity of ischemia, PM tip geometry, and potentially leaflet length. It would therefore also be reasonable to pursue future experimental studies of chordal cutting in models of more global chronic LV dysfunction, with anterior and posterolateral infarction, and of more severe MR, in which a combined approach addressing both chordae and annulus should be necessary. It is interesting to point out that in the recent paper of Agricola, Alfieri et al 40, the authors described 2 patterns of leaflet tethering that are essentially determined by the type of LV remodeling (local inferior vs. global remodeling). The most common pattern in all instances, especially following annuloplasty, was PL restriction 12,41with or without anterior leaflet restriction, suggesting the possibility that bileaflet chordal cutting, which most strongly mobilized the PL, will be also effective in decreasing MR in more global LV remodeling as well, in which both leaflets are restricted.
Another limitation was the noninvasive evaluation of global LV dysfunction. As these experiments required three thoracotomies, including one for MI creation and another with survival extracorporeal circulation for MV chordal cutting, and therefore entailed a high attrition rate (>45%), we did not add invasive PV loop studies to minimize operative time, procedures and further mortality.
Conclusion
Cutting secondary chordae in the chronic post-MI setting does not adversely affect long-term LV remodeling and limits progressive increases in LV volumes. This study confirms the long-term safety of this technique and its availability as a strategy to relieve ischemic MR.
Sources of Funding
This work was supported in part by grant 07CVD04 for the Transatlantic Network of Excellence in Mitral Valve Disease from the Leducq Foundation, Paris, France and by grants R01 and K24 HL67434, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Dr Catherine Szymanski was supported by a grant from the Fédération Française de Cardiologie
Footnotes
Journal Subject Codes: [7] Chronic ischemic heart disease; [31] Echocardiography; [38] CV surgery: valvular disease
Disclosures
None.
References
- 1.Lamas GA, Mitchell GF, Flaker GC, Smith SC, Jr., Gersh BJ, Basta L, Moye L, Braunwald E, Pfeffer MA. Clinical significance of mitral regurgitation after acute myocardial infarction. Survival and Ventricular Enlargement Investigators. Circulation. 1997;96:827–33. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.96.3.827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Grigioni F, Enriquez-Sarano M, Zehr KJ, Bailey KR, Tajik AJ. Ischemic mitral regurgitation: long-term outcome and prognostic implications with quantitative Doppler assessment. Circulation. 2001;103:1759–64. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.103.13.1759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kono T, Sabbah HN, Rosman H, Alam M, Jafri S, Stein PD, Goldstein S. Mechanism of functional mitral regurgitation during acute myocardial ischemia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:1101–5. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90302-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sabbah HN, Kono T, Rosman H, Jafri S, Stein PD, Goldstein S. Left ventricular shape: a factor in the etiology of functional mitral regurgitation in heart failure. Am Heart J. 1992;123:961–6. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(92)90703-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Otsuji Y, Handschumacher MD, Schwammenthal E, Jiang L, Song JK, Guerrero JL, Vlahakes GJ, Levine RA. Insights from three-dimensional echocardiography into the mechanism of functional mitral regurgitation: direct in vivo demonstration of altered leaflet tethering geometry. Circulation. 1997;96:1999–2008. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.96.6.1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.He S, Fontaine AA, Schwammenthal E, Yoganathan AP, Levine RA. Integrated mechanism for functional mitral regurgitation: leaflet restriction versus coapting force: in vitro studies. Circulation. 1997;96:1826–34. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.96.6.1826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Liel-Cohen N, Guerrero JL, Otsuji Y, Handschumacher MD, Rudski LG, Hunziker PR, Tanabe H, Scherrer-Crosbie M, Sullivan S, Levine RA. Design of a new surgical approach for ventricular remodeling to relieve ischemic mitral regurgitation: insights from 3-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation. 2000;101:2756–63. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.101.23.2756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Carpentier A. Cardiac valve surgery--the “French correction”. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1983;86:323–37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Magne J, Pibarot P, Dagenais F, Hachicha Z, Dumesnil JG, Senechal M. Preoperative posterior leaflet angle accurately predicts outcome after restrictive mitral valve annuloplasty for ischemic mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 2007;115:782–91. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.649236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nesta F, Otsuji Y, Handschumacher MD, Messas E, Leavitt M, Carpentier A, Levine RA, Hung J. Leaflet concavity: a rapid visual clue to the presence and mechanism of functional mitral regurgitation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003;16:1301–8. doi: 10.1067/j.echo.2003.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.McGee EC, Gillinov AM, Blackstone EH, Rajeswaran J, Cohen G, Najam F, Shiota T, Sabik JF, Lytle BW, McCarthy PM, Cosgrove DM. Recurrent mitral regurgitation after annuloplasty for functional ischemic mitral regurgitation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;128:916–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.07.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zhu F, Otsuji Y, Yotsumoto G, Yuasa T, Ueno T, Yu B, Koriyama C, Hamasaki S, Biro S, Kisanuki A, Minagoe S, Levine RA, Sakata R, Tei C. Mechanism of persistent ischemic mitral regurgitation after annuloplasty: importance of augmented posterior mitral leaflet tethering. Circulation. 2005;112:I396–401. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.524561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Perloff JK, Roberts WC. The mitral apparatus. Functional anatomy of mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 1972;46:227–39. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.46.2.227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Messas E, Guerrero JL, Handschumacher MD, Conrad C, Chow CM, Sullivan S, Yoganathan AP, Levine RA. Chordal cutting: a new therapeutic approach for ischemic mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 2001;104:1958–63. doi: 10.1161/hc4201.097135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Messas E, Pouzet B, Touchot B, Guerrero JL, Vlahakes GJ, Desnos M, Menasche P, Hagege A, Levine RA. Efficacy of chordal cutting to relieve chronic persistent ischemic mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 2003;108(Suppl 1):II111–5. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000087658.47544.7f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Reardon MJ, David TE. Mitral valve replacement with preservation of the subvalvular apparatus. Curr Opin Cardiol. 1999;14:104–10. doi: 10.1097/00001573-199903000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.David TE, Burns RJ, Bacchus CM, Druck MN. Mitral valve replacement for mitral regurgitation with and without preservation of chordae tendineae. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1984;88:718–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Moon MR, DeAnda A, Jr., Daughters GT, 2nd, Ingels NB, Miller DC. Effects of chordal disruption on regional left ventricular torsional deformation. Circulation. 1996;94:II143–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.David TE, Uden DE, Strauss HD. The importance of the mitral apparatus in left ventricular function after correction of mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 1983;68:II76–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Rodriguez F, Langer F, Harrington KB, Tibayan FA, Zasio MK, Cheng A, Liang D, Daughters GT, Covell JW, Criscione JC, Ingels NB, Miller DC. Importance of mitral valve second-order chordae for left ventricular geometry, wall thickening mechanics, and global systolic function. Circulation. 2004;110:II115–22. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000138580.57971.b4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Messas E, Yosefy C, Chaput M, Guerrero JL, Sullivan S, Menasche P, Carpentier A, Desnos M, Hagege AA, Vlahakes GJ, Levine RA. Chordal cutting does not adversely affect left ventricle contractile function. Circulation. 2006;114:I524–8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.000612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yamamoto H, Iguro Y, Sakata R, Arata K, Yotsumoto G. Effectively treating ischemic mitral regurgitation with chordal cutting in combination with ring annuloplasty and left ventricular reshaping approach. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;130:589–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Borger MA, Murphy PM, Alam A, Fazel S, Maganti M, Armstrong S, Rao V, David TE. Initial results of the chordal-cutting operation for ischemic mitral regurgitation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133:1483–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.01.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wakiyama H, Okada Y, Kitamura A, Tsuda S, Shomura Y, Shinkai M, Fujiwara H, Handa N, Nasu M, Tanabe K, Tani T, Morioka S. [Chordal cutting for the treatment of ischemic mitral regurgitation: two case reports]. J Cardiol. 2004;44:113–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Fayad G, Modine T, Le Tourneau T, Al-Ruzzeh S, Ennezat PV, Decoene C, Warembourg H. Chordal cutting technique through aortotomy: a new approach to treat chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;129:1173–4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Fayad G, Marechaux S, Modine T, Azzaoui R, Larrue B, Ennezat PV, Bekhti H, Decoene C, Deklunder G, Le Tourneau T, Warembourg H. Chordal cutting VIA aortotomy in ischemic mitral regurgitation: surgical and echocardiographic study. J Card Surg. 2008;23:52–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2007.00503.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Llaneras MR, Nance ML, Streicher JT, Lima JA, Savino JS, Bogen DK, Deac RF, Ratcliffe MB, Edmunds LH., Jr Large animal model of ischemic mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994;57:432–9. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(94)91012-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Llaneras MR, Nance ML, Streicher JT, Linden PL, Downing SW, Lima JA, Deac R, Edmunds LH., Jr Pathogenesis of ischemic mitral insufficiency. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993;105:439–42. discussion 442-3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Handschumacher MD, Lethor JP, Siu SC, Mele D, Rivera JM, Picard MH, Weyman AE, Levine RA. A new integrated system for three-dimensional echocardiographic reconstruction: development and validation for ventricular volume with application in human subjects. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;21:743–53. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90108-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Levine RA, Handschumacher MD, Sanfilippo AJ, Hagege AA, Harrigan P, Marshall JE, Weyman AE. Three-dimensional echocardiographic reconstruction of the mitral valve, with implications for the diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse. Circulation. 1989;80:589–98. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.80.3.589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Blumlein S, Bouchard A, Schiller NB, Dae M, Byrd BF, 3rd, Ports T, Botvinick EH. Quantitation of mitral regurgitation by Doppler echocardiography. Circulation. 1986;74:306–14. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.74.2.306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mele D, Vandervoort P, Palacios I, Rivera JM, Dinsmore RE, Schwammenthal E, Marshall JE, Weyman AE, Levine RA. Proximal jet size by Doppler color flow mapping predicts severity of mitral regurgitation. Clinical studies. Circulation. 1995;91:746–54. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.91.3.746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Tribouilloy C, Shen WF, Quere JP, Rey JL, Choquet D, Dufosse H, Lesbre JP. Assessment of severity of mitral regurgitation by measuring regurgitant jet width at its origin with a transesophageal Doppler color flow imaging. Circulation. 1992;85:1248–53. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.85.4.1248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zoghbi WA, Enriquez-Sarano M, Foster E, Grayburn PA, Kraft CD, Levine RA, Nihoyannopoulos P, Otto CM, Quinones MA, Rakowski H, Stewart WJ, Waggoner A, Weissman NJ. Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003;16:777–802. doi: 10.1016/S0894-7317(03)00335-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Pellikka PA, Picard MH, Roman MJ, Seward J, Shanewise JS, Solomon SD, Spencer KT, Sutton MS, Stewart WJ. Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005;18:1440–63. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2005.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Beeri R, Yosefy C, Guerrero JL, Abedat S, Handschumacher MD, Stroud RE, Sullivan S, Chaput M, Gilon D, Vlahakes GJ, Spinale FG, Hajjar RJ, Levine RA. Early repair of moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation reverses left ventricular remodeling: a functional and molecular study. Circulation. 2007;116:I288–93. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.681114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Beeri R, Yosefy C, Guerrero JL, Nesta F, Abedat S, Chaput M, del Monte F, Handschumacher MD, Stroud R, Sullivan S, Pugatsch T, Gilon D, Vlahakes GJ, Spinale FG, Hajjar RJ, Levine RA. Mitral regurgitation augments post-myocardial infarction remodeling failure of hypertrophic compensation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:476–86. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.07.093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hung J, Chaput M, Guerrero JL, Handschumacher MD, Papakostas L, Sullivan S, Solis J, Levine RA. Persistent reduction of ischemic mitral regurgitation by papillary muscle repositioning: structural stabilization of the papillary muscle-ventricular wall complex. Circulation. 2007;116:I259–63. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.679951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kunzelman KS, Cochran RP. Mechanical properties of basal and marginal mitral valve chordae tendineae. ASAIO Trans. 1990;36:M405–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Agricola E, Oppizzi M, Maisano F, De Bonis M, Schinkel AF, Torracca L, Margonato A, Melisurgo G, Alfieri O. Echocardiographic classification of chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation caused by restricted motion according to tethering pattern. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2004;5:326–34. doi: 10.1016/j.euje.2004.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lai DT, Timek TA, Dagum P, Green GR, Glasson JR, Daughters GT, Liang D, Ingels NB, Jr., Miller DC. The effects of ring annuloplasty on mitral leaflet geometry during acute left ventricular ischemia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;120:966–75. doi: 10.1067/mtc.2000.110186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]






