Skip to main content
Journal of the Royal Society Interface logoLink to Journal of the Royal Society Interface
. 2010 Aug 25;7(Suppl 6):S689–S706. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2010.0347.focus

Biological characteristics of stem cells from foetal, cord blood and extraembryonic tissues

Hassan Abdulrazzak 1, Dafni Moschidou 1, Gemma Jones 1, Pascale V Guillot 1,*
PMCID: PMC2988276  PMID: 20739312

Abstract

Foetal stem cells (FSCs) can be isolated during gestation from many different tissues such as blood, liver and bone marrow as well as from a variety of extraembryonic tissues such as amniotic fluid and placenta. Strong evidence suggests that these cells differ on many biological aspects such as growth kinetics, morphology, immunophenotype, differentiation potential and engraftment capacity in vivo. Despite these differences, FSCs appear to be more primitive and have greater multi-potentiality than their adult counterparts. For example, foetal blood haemopoietic stem cells proliferate more rapidly than those found in cord blood or adult bone marrow. These features have led to FSCs being investigated for pre- and post-natal cell therapy and regenerative medicine applications. The cells have been used in pre-clinical studies to treat a wide range of diseases such as skeletal dysplasia, diaphragmatic hernia and respiratory failure, white matter damage, renal pathologies as well as cancers. Their intermediate state between adult and embryonic stem cells also makes them an ideal candidate for reprogramming to the pluripotent status.

Keywords: stem cell, foetal, regenerative medicine, induced pluripotent stem

1. Introduction

Stem cells are undifferentiated cells with the capacity to self-renew, differentiate and repopulate a host in vivo (Weissman et al. 2001). Their plasticity or potency is hierarchical ranging from totipotent (differentiating into all cell types including placenta), pluripotent (differentiating into cells of the three germ layers, ectoderm, mesoderm and endoderm, but not trophoblastic cells), multipotent (differentiating into cells of more than one type but not necessarily into all the cells of a given germ layer) to unipotent (differentiating into one type of cell only, e.g. muscle or neuron).

Pluripotent stem cells can be derived from the inner cell mass of the pre-implantation embryo (i.e. embryonic stem (ES) cells) or isolated from the foetal primordial germ cell pool (PGC) above the allantois (i.e. embryonic germ (EG) cells and embryonic carcinoma (EC) cells; Thomson et al. 1998; Andrews et al. 2005). The destruction of the blastocyst or early foetus necessary for their derivation/isolation raises ethical concerns (Lo & Parham 2009), although recent work has shown that ES cells can be derived from single blastomeres isolated using procedures similar to those routinely used for pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (Klimanskaya et al. 2007). However, safety concerns still remain because of the tumorigenicity of ES cells. Alternatively, adult stem cells can be found in almost all tissues examined including brain, dental pulp, muscle, bone marrow, skin and pancreas and have been extensively characterized for their therapeutic potential. The adult stem cell could be multi-potent (e.g. haematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) giving rise to all blood cells and adherent stromal/mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) that give rise to bone, fat, cartilage and muscle) or unipotent (e.g. progenitor cells). Adult MSCs have the problem of being difficult to extract in sufficient numbers for therapy and/or presenting restricted plasticity and limited proliferative capacity compared with ES cells.

In recent years, foetal stem cells (FSCs) and stem cells isolated from cord blood or extraembryonic tissues have emerged as a potential ‘half way house’ between ES cells and adult stem cells. FSCs can be found in foetal tissues such as blood, liver, bone marrow, pancreas, spleen and kidney, and stem cells are also found in cord blood and extraembryonic tissues such as amniotic fluid, placenta and amnion (Marcus & Woodbury 2008). Their primitive properties, expansion potential and lack of tumorogenicity make them an attractive option for regenerative medicine in cell therapy and tissue engineering settings. While extraembryonic tissues could be used with few ethical reservations, the isolation of FSCs from abortuses is subject to significant public unease. We review here the phenotypic characteristics of stem cells from foetal, cord blood and extraembryonic tissues, their application in cell therapy and their potential for reprogramming towards pluripotentiality.

2. Phenotypic characteristics of foetal stem cells

Stem cells are collected from abortal foetal tissue, surplus of pre-natal diagnostic tissues or tissues at delivery, subject to informed consent, institutional ethics approval and compliance with national guidelines covering foetal tissue research. Until recently they were thought to be multi-potent (O'Donoghue & Fisk 2004), but this picture is now changing as evidence is mounting regarding the existence of pluripotent subpopulations in some foetal and extraembryonic tissues (Cananzi et al. 2009). Some of the properties of the cells are summarized in table 1.

Table 1.

embryonic stem cells foetal tissues
extraembryonic
adult BM MSC
blood liver bone marrow cord blood Wharton's jelly amniotic fluid amnion-derived epithelial cells amnion- derived MSC chorion- derived MSC
cell phenotype (s) E MSC/H* MSC/H* MSC/H* MSC/H* MSC MSC/AFS/VSEL* EP MSC MSC MSC
doubling time (DT)/population doublings (PD) 48–24 h (DT)/indefinite (PD) 21.9 ± 1.1 h (first-trimester MSC) (DT)/28.4a (PD) 46 h (second-trimester MSC) (DT) 32 h (second- trimester MSC) (DT) 39–43 h (DT)/20b (PD) 85–11 h (DT) 25–38 h (second-trimester MSC) 36 h (AFS) (DT)/66 (MSC)/over 250 AFS (PD) 38.4 h (DT) 30c (PD) 21.25 ± 3.2 h (DT)/30d 54–111 h (DT)/7.1a (PD)
feeder/matrigel requirement +
potency P P/M P/M P/M P/M P/M P/M P/M P/M P/M M
Oct-4 +++ ++ ++ + + + + + + + ±
Sox2 +++ n.d. n.d. n.d. + + n.d. n.d. ±
Nanog +++ ++ ++ ++ + + ± + n.d. + ±
c-Myc +++ n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. + + n.d. n.d. n.d.
Klf-4 +++ n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d.
TRF length/telomerase activity +++ ++ ++ ++ ++ + n.d. n.d. +
alkaline phosphatase +++ n.d. n.d. ++ + + + n.d. ±
c-Kit (CD117) +++ + + + ± + + ± ±
Rex-1 +++ ++ + ++ + n.d. + + + ±
SSEA-4 +++ ++ ++ ++ + + + + +
SSEA-3 +++ ++ ++ ++ + +(low) +
Tra-1-81 +++ ++ ++ ++ n.d. + + +
Tra-1-61 +++ ++ ++ ++ n.d. + ± + +
MHC class I +(low) +(low) +(low) +(low) + + + +(low) +(low) + +
MHC class II (HLA-DR) ± ±
teratoma formation in immune compromised mice yes n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. no no n.d. n.d. no

aOver a period of 50 days.

bOver eight passages.

cOver 14 passages.

dOver five passages.

2.1. Foetal tissues

2.1.1. Foetal MSCs

MSCs are multi-potent stem cells that can differentiate towards mesoderm-derived lineages (i.e. osteogenic, adipogenic, chondrogenic and myogenic; Pittenger et al. 1999). Their potential to repair damaged tissue and their immunomodulatory properties make them very attractive for a wide range of regenerative medicine applications such as cell therapy and tissue engineering for hollow and solid organs (Horwitz et al. 2002; Abdallah & Kassem 2008; Le Blanc et al. 2008). They were first identified in adult bone marrow where they represent 0.001–0.01% of total nucleated cells (Owen & Friedenstein 1988). Adherent stromal cells with similar characteristics were subsequently isolated from other tissues such as adipose, dental pulp, muscle, liver and brain (Porada et al. 2006; Huang et al. 2009). They are also found in foetal and extraembryonic tissues, where they seem to possess greater proliferation capacity and differentiation potential than their adult counterparts (Campagnoli et al. 2001; Guillot et al. 2007b; Pappa & Anagnou 2009).

2.1.1.1. Common characteristics

MSCs isolated from foetal tissues such as blood, liver, bone marrow, lung and pancreas all share common characteristics. For example, they are spindle-shaped cells with the capacity to differentiate into the standard mesenchymal lineages, i.e. bone, fat and cartilage. They do not express haematopoietic or endothelial markers (e.g. they are CD45/34/14 and von Willebrand factor negative; Gucciardo et al. 2009), but express stroma-associated markers CD29 (β1-integrin), CD73 (SH3 and SH4), CD105 (SH2), CD44 (HCAM1), the early bone marrow progenitor cell marker CD90 (thy-1) and the extracellular matrix proteins vimentin, laminin and fibronectin (Guillot et al. 2006, 2007a). Contrary to adult bone marrow MSCs, first-trimester foetal blood, liver and bone marrow MSCs express baseline levels of the pluripotency stem cell markers Oct-4, Nanog, Rex-1, SSEA-3, SSEA-4, Tra-1-60 and Tra-1-81 (Guillot et al. 2007b; Zhang et al. 2009). Regardless of their tissue of origin, first-trimester foetal MSCs self-renew faster in culture than adult MSCs (30–35 h versus 80–100 h) and senesce later while retaining a stable phenotype (Guillot et al. 2007b). Foetal MSCs are therefore more readily expandable to therapeutic scales for either pre- or post-natal ex vivo gene or cell therapy and tissue engineering. Having greater multi-potentiality and differentiating more readily than adult MSCs into cells of mesodermal origin such as bone and muscle, they can also differentiate into cells from other lineages such as oligodendrocytes and haematopoietic cells (MacKenzie et al. 2001; Chan et al. 2006; Kennea et al. 2009). In terms of engraftment, they have a competitive advantage compared with adult cells (Rebel et al. 1996; Harrison et al. 1997; Taylor et al. 2002). Other advantageous characteristics relevant to cell therapy include having active telomerase (Guillot et al. 2007b), expressing low levels of HLA I and lacking intracellular HLA II, and taking longer to express this upon interferon γ stimulation than adult MSCs (Gotherstrom et al. 2004). Foetal MSCs also express a shared α2, α4 and α5β1 integrin profile with first-trimester HSCs, implicating them in homing and engraftment, and, consistent with this, they have significantly greater binding to their respective extracellular matrix ligands than adult MSCs (de la Fuente et al. 2003). Finally, human foetal MSCs are readily transducible with transduction efficiencies of greater than 95 per cent using lentiviral vectors with stable gene expression at both short- and long-time points without affecting self-renewal or multi-potentiality (Chan et al. 2005).

2.1.1.2. Specific characteristics

Although the above characteristics are shared among the various types of foetal stem, they also have specific traits that are dependent on tissue of origin and gestational age. For example, foetal MSCs are present in foetal blood from the earliest gestation tested, seven weeks, where they account for approximately 0.4 per cent of foetal nucleated cells. Their numbers decline to very low levels after 13 weeks' gestation (Campagnoli et al. 2001). MSC derived from foetal bone marrow also decline with age with one MSC found among 10 000 in mid-trimester as compared with one MSC per 250 000 cells in adult marrow.

Significant variations have been found among foetal tissue cells in terms of cell surface markers. For example, foetal lung has a higher proportion of CD34+/CD45 cells (44%) than bone marrow (4.8%), spleen (12.6%) and liver (7.5%) (in't Anker et al. 2003a,b). Also foetal metanephric MSCs do not express CD45, CD34 or other haematopoietic markers; instead, they express high levels of mesenchymal markers such as vimentin, laminin and type I collagen.

There is also variation among the cells in terms of differentiation capacity. MSCs derived from foetal liver during the first and second trimester have a reduced osteogenic differentiation potential in comparison with first-trimester foetal blood and with second-trimester spleen, lung and bone marrow MSCs, possibly because of a reduction in osteogenic progenitor numbers (in‘t Anker et al. 2003a,b). Foetal pancreatic MSCs, shown to be capable of differentiating into chondrogenic, osteogenic or adipogenic lineages (Hu et al. 2003), can also engraft, differentiate and secrete human insulin in a sheep model (Ersek et al. 2010). Moreover, foetal pancreatic ductal stem cells can differentiate into insulin-producing cells in vitro (Yao et al. 2004).

Foetal metanephric MSCs can be induced in vitro to adopt an osteogenic or myogenic phenotype and, when transplanted in a foetal lamb model, they show long-term persistence and site-specific differentiation (Almeida-Porada et al. 2002).

Altogether these data indicate a high level of heterogeneity within the foetal stem cell pool.

2.1.2. Foetal HSCs

HSCs are multi-potent stem cells that maintain functional haematopoiesis by generation of all haematopoietic lineages throughout foetal and adult life (Weissman & Shizuru 2008). They are characterized by the expression of CD34 and CD45 antigens, and the absence of markers such as CD38 and human leucocyte antigen (HLA)/DRE (Huss 2000; Taylor et al. 2002). During ontogeny the site of haematopoiesis is modified several times (Cumano et al. 2001). An area along the dorsal embryonic aorta termed the aorta–gonad–mesonephros (AGM) is a rich source of HSCs, which then migrate to the embryonic liver and later seed other haematopoietic tissues such as the bone marrow (McGrath & Palis 2008). HSCs are usually assayed in animal models based on their capacity to repopulate the entire haematopoietic system in conditioned recipients after transplantation. Similar to MSCs, it is possible to transplant human cells into xenogeneic recipients such as foetal sheep that act as models of human haematopoiesis (O'Donoghue & Fisk 2004).

First-trimester foetal blood contains more CD34+ cells than term gestation blood, yet CD34+ cells account for only 5 per cent of CD45+ cells in the blood at that stage (Campagnoli et al. 2001). The number of circulating HSCs increases from the first trimester to peak in the second trimester in utero, probably because of cells migrating from the foetal liver to establish haematopoiesis in the foetal bone marrow (Clapp et al. 1995). Some HSCs remain in the umbilical cord at delivery, where they can be collected for allogeneic or occasionally autologous cell transplantation (see §2.2.1.).

In the second trimester, CD34+ cells constitute 4 per cent of cells in blood, 16.5 per cent in bone marrow, 6 per cent in liver, 5 per cent in spleen and 1.1 per cent in the thymus (Lim et al. 2005). This frequency of CD34+ cells in the blood gradually diminishes during the third trimester, probably reflecting establishment of the marrow as the primary site of haematopoiesis and the declining role of the foetal liver in that regard (Jones et al. 1994; Wagers et al. 2002). The number of cells negative for CD38 within the CD34+ population is also higher in early foetal blood, suggesting that these cells are more primitive and have greater potential than HSCs circulating later in ontogeny (O'Donoghue & Fisk 2004). Even relatively differentiated erythroblasts are more primitive in first compared with later trimester foetal blood. Foetal blood HSCs proliferate more rapidly than those in cord blood or adult bone marrow, and produce all haematopoietic lineages (Campagnoli et al. 2001).

Foetal liver is also a source of HSCs, and, despite their relatively small number, it is possible to generate sufficient numbers of cells for transplantation in four weeks (Rollini et al. 2004), although, to our knowledge, it has not been proved that foetal liver HSCs can successfully transplant a human recipient. The phenotype of foetal liver HSCs changes with gestation age. For example, their differentiation potential decreases markedly with gestational age, and cells that expressed both CD34 and c-kit (CD117) were identified in the first-trimester foetal liver whereas the cells expressing more committed hepatic markers only appeared during the second trimester (Nava et al. 2005).

2.2. Extraembryonic tissue

2.2.1. Umbilical cord blood

Umbilical cord blood is now an established source of transplantable HSCs that have a greater proliferative capacity, lower immunological reactivity and lower risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) than those derived from adult bone marrow (Broxmeyer et al. 1989; Yu et al. 2001; Ballen 2005; Schoemans et al. 2006; Brunstein et al. 2007; Hwang et al. 2007; Broxmeyer 2010). These cells are capable of repopulating bone following intra-bone injection of severe combined immunodeficiency mice (Mazurier et al. 2003; Wang et al. 2003) and are used clinically as an alternative to adult bone marrow HSCs in some cases (Delaney et al. 2010). The cells are CD34+ and CD38 and their frequency is greater than that of bone marrow or peripheral blood following cytokine mobilization (Pappa & Anagnou 2009). It has also been demonstrated that cord blood contains MSCs (Weiss & Troyer 2006; Secco et al. 2008) that can support the in vivo expansion of HSCs and function as an accessory cell population for engraftment (Javazon et al. 2004; Wang, J. et al. 2004). The frequency of MSCs in umbilical cord blood is low however, with MSCs successfully isolated from only a third of all samples collected (Bieback et al. 2004).

Cord blood stem cells expressing baseline levels of ES cell markers such as Oct-4, Nanog, SSEA-3 and SSEA-4 have also been described (Zhao et al. 2006). Using a two-stage isolation approach whereby the erythrocytes in cord blood are lysed and the remaining cells are sorted using flow cytometry, it has been possible to isolate and enrich for a subpopulation of cells that are CXCR4+, CD133+, CD34+, Lin and CD45.

These cells have been described as very small embryonic-like (VSEL) stem cells because they are only 3–5 µm in diameter and express Oct-4, Nanog and SSEA-4 (Kucia et al. 2007; Zuba-Surma et al. 2010). Compared with MSCs, VSEL cells are smaller, have a large nucleus to cytoplasm ratio and open-type chromatin. As a similar population has also been found in adult bone marrow, where they also express the same primitive markers, it has been hypothesized that VSEL cells are related to a population of early PGCs that are retained during development (Kucia et al. 2006).

2.2.2. Wharton's jelly

Wharton's jelly is the connective tissue surrounding the umbilical vessels and includes the perivascular, intervascular and subamnion regions (Troyer & Weiss 2008). MSCs have been isolated from all three regions and it remains unclear whether they represent distinct cell populations (Karahuseyinoglu et al. 2007). The cells have been given different names by different groups (Troyer & Weiss 2008). MSCs isolated from Wharton's jelly share similar properties with other cord blood MSCs as well as adult bone marrow MSCs on the expression of markers, differentiation potential and cytokine production (McElreavey et al. 1991; Wang, H.-S. et al. 2004; Anzalone et al. 2010). Wharton's jelly MSCs can also be induced to differentiate into cells similar to neural, expressing neuron-specific enolase and other neural markers (Mitchell et al. 2003; Anzalone et al. 2010).

2.2.3. Amniotic fluid

In recent years, amniotic fluid has emerged as a major source of putative pluripotent stem cells that avoid many of the problems associated with ES cells such as their non-suitability for autologous use, their capacity for tumour formation and the ethical concerns they raise.

In humans, the amniotic fluid starts to appear at the beginning of week 2 of gestation as a small film of liquid between the cells of the epiblast. The fluid expands separating the epiblast (i.e. the future embryo) from the amnioblasts (i.e. the future amnion), thus forming the amniotic cavity (Miki & Strom 2006). The origin of amniotic fluid cells is still very much debatable (Kunisaki et al. 2007; Cananzi et al. 2009). However, what is known is that the majority of cells present are terminally differentiated and have limited proliferative capacity (Gosden & Brock 1978; Siegel et al. 2007). However, a number of studies have demonstrated the presence of a subset of cells with a proliferative and differentiation potential (Torricelli et al. 1993; Streubel et al. 1996).

A variety of different types of stem cells have been isolated and characterized from amniotic fluid. These include cells found in mid-gestation expressing the haematopoietic marker CD34 (Da Sacco et al. 2010) as well as cells with mesenchymal features, able to proliferate in vitro more rapidly than comparable foetal and adult cells (Kaviani et al. 2001; in‘t Anker et al. 2003a,b; Nadri & Soleimani 2007; Roubelakis et al. 2007; Sessarego et al. 2008). Amniotic fluid MSCs are negative for haematopoietic markers such as CD45, CD34 and CD14 (Prusa & Hengstschlager 2002; in‘t Anker et al. 2003a,b; Prusa et al. 2003; Tsai et al. 2004). Despite their high proliferation rate, these cells display a normal karyotype when expanded in vitro and do not form tumours in vivo (Sessarego et al. 2008). They exhibit a broad differentiation potential towards mesenchymal lineages (in‘t Anker et al. 2003a,b; Kolambkar et al. 2007; Nadri & Soleimani 2007; Tsai et al. 2007).

De Coppi et al. isolated c-kit-positive (CD117) cells that represent about 1 per cent of cells present in second-trimester amniotic fluid. These cells were named amniotic fluid stem (AFS) cells. They can be cultured without feeders, double in 36 h, are not tumorigenic, have long telomeres and retain a normal karyotype for over 250 population doublings (De Coppi et al. 2007a). Cultured human AFS cells are positive for ES cell (e.g. Oct-4, Nanog and SSEA-4) and mesenchymal cell markers such as CD90, CD105 (SH2), CD73 (SH3/4) and several adhesion molecules (e.g. CD29 and CD44; Tsai et al. 2006; Chambers et al. 2007; De Coppi et al. 2007a). Furthermore, it was possible to generate clonal human lines from these cells, verified by retroviral marking, which were capable of differentiating into lineages representative of all three EG layers. Almost all clonal AFS cell lines express Oct-4 and Nanog, markers of a pluripotent undifferentiated state (De Coppi et al. 2007a). c-kit+ Lin cells from human and mouse amniotic fluid display a multi-lineage haematopoietic potential in vitro and in vivo, despite having low or negative CD34 expression (Ditadi et al. 2009). c-kit-positive human AFS cell lines can also form embryoid bodies (EB) with an incidence of 18–82%. EB formation was accompanied by a decrease in Oct-4 and Nodal and the induction of differentiation markers such as Pax 6, Nestin (ectodermal), GATA 4 and HBE1 (mesodermal) (Valli et al. 2010). The potential for a wide range of regenerative medicine and tissue engineering applications as well as their relatively few ethical concerns makes them an attractive source for cell therapy, particularly considering that a bank of 100 000 amniotic fluid specimens could potentially supply 99 per cent of the US population with a perfect match for transplantation (Atala 2009).

2.2.4. Placenta

The placenta is a fetomaternal organ involved in maintaining foetal tolerance and allows nutrient uptake and gas exchange with the mother, but also contains a high number of progenitor cells or stem cells (Parolini et al. 2010). It has two sides: one foetal (amnion and chorion) and one maternal (deciduas). The amnion membrane contains two cell types: the amniotic epithelial cells (AECs) derived from the epiblast; and amniotic mesenchymal cells derived from the hypoblast. The chorion layer consists of cytotrophoblasts and syncytiotrophoblasts that are derived from the outer layer of the blastocyst (trophectoderm) (Ilancheran et al. 2009; Insausti et al. 2010).

The availability, phenotypic plasticity and immunomodulatory properties of placenta-derived progenitor/stem cells are useful characteristics for cell therapy and tissue engineering. Cells can be isolated during ongoing pregnancy using minimally invasive techniques such as chorionic villus sampling (CVS) and placental tissues are readily available at delivery for allogeneic or autologous use. Cells that have been isolated from placenta include the human AECs, human amnion mesenchymal stromal stem cells (AMSCs), human chorionic mesenchymal/stromal stem cells (CMSCs), human chorionic trophoblastic cells and HSCs (Parolini et al. 2008).

Mesenchymal placenta cells are plastic adherent, share a similar immunophenotype and have lineage differentiation potential. They express stromal markers such as CD166, CD105, CD73, CD90 and others, while they are negative for the haematopoietic markers CD14, CD34 and CD45 (Igura et al. 2004; Sudo et al. 2007). Additionally, they express pluripotency markers such as SSEA3, SSEA4, Oct-4, Nanog, Tra-1-60 and Tra-1-81 (Yen et al. 2005; Battula et al. 2007). They lack or have very low expression of MHC class I antigens and do not express MHC class II antigens or the T-cell co-stimulatory molecule B7, giving the cells immunomodulatory properties (Bailo et al. 2004; Miao et al. 2006).

2.2.4.1. Amniotic epithelial cells

AECs are commonly isolated from the amniotic membrane using digestive enzymes. The cells are plastic adherent and grow under MSC conditions, i.e. Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10–20% FBS, with the addition of growth factors such as epidermal growth factor (EGF) (Miki et al. 2010). c-Kit and CD90 (Thy-1) expression is either negative or at a low level (Miki et al. 2005; Miki & Strom 2006). However, evidence suggests that they express pluripotency markers and have the ability to form xenogeneic chimera with mouse ES cells in vitro (Tamagawa et al. 2004). The cells have subsequently been differentiated in vitro into cell types from all three germ layers (Miki et al. 2005; Miki & Strom 2006; Ilancheran et al. 2007; Parolini et al. 2008). However, in contrast with ES cells, Miki et al. (2005) demonstrated that human AE cells did not form gross or histological tumours up to seven months post-transplantation in SCID/Beige mice.

2.2.4.2. Amnion-derived mesenchymal stromal cells

Both amnion and chorion MSCs have been extensively characterized and can be isolated throughout gestation from first trimester to delivery. Both cells share common characteristics, such as plastic adherence, and, despite limited proliferation capacity, show in vitro differentiation down the osteogenic, adipogenic, chrondrogenic and neurogenic lineages, although some report and show in vivo multi-organ engraftment capacity. In addition, the volume of term placenta makes it an attractive source of stem cells, as on average human term placenta weighs more than 590 g (Bolisetty et al. 2002). Human placenta contains various types of cells of different developmental origin. Cells of the chorion and decidua are derived from trophectoderm, while amnion is derived from the epiblast of the developing embryo (Crane & Cheung 1988).

MSCs have been successfully isolated from first-, second- and third-trimester placental compartments, including the amnion, chorion, decidua parietalis and decidua basalis (in‘t Anker et al. 2004; Portmann-Lanz et al. 2006; Soncini et al. 2007; Poloni et al. 2008), and represent less than 1 per cent of cells present in the human placenta (Zhang et al. 2004; Alviano et al. 2007). First-trimester placenta stem cells generally grow faster than those found in the third trimester (Portmann-Lanz et al. 2006), and the majority of term placenta-derived stem cells are found at the quiescent G0/G1 phase of the cell cycle.

2.2.4.3. Chorion-derived stem cells

CMSCs have been isolated during pregnancy (CVS) or from the term placenta at delivery. The immunophenotype of term placenta cells is similar to that of adult bone marrow MSCs, although renin and flt-1 have been shown to be expressed uniquely in placenta MSCs (Fukuchi et al. 2004). Similarly to human amnion isolated from term placenta, term chorion MSCs successfully engraft in neonatal swine and rats and failed to induce a xenogeneic response (Bailo et al. 2004), indicating that these cells may have an immunoprivileged status consistent with their low level of HLA I and absence of HLA II expression (Kubo et al. 2001). Of relevance for pre-natal autologous and allogeneic therapy, chorion MSCs can be successfully isolated from chorionic villi during first-trimester gestation. The chorionic villi do not express typical MSC cell surface antigens and have the capacity to differentiate into lineages of the three germ layers, with a subset of cells expressing the pluripotency markers Oct-4, ALP, Nanog and Sox2 (Spitalieri et al. 2009). In addition to differentiating into adipogenic, chondrogenic and osteogenic cells in vitro (Portmann-Lanz et al. 2006; Ilancheran et al. 2007), they can also differentiate into cells with some characteristics of hepatocytes in vitro and have the ability to store glycogen (Chien et al. 2006; Huang 2007; Tamagawa et al. 2007). Differentiation into other cell types such as endothelial cells (Alviano et al. 2007), cardiomyocytes (Zhao et al. 2005), neurons, oligodendrocytes and glial cells (Miao et al. 2006; Yen et al. 2008; Portmann-Lanz et al. 2010) has also been reported, but these findings have mostly relied on upregulation of tissue-specific markers without providing robust functionality tests.

3. Theraputic applications of foetal stem cells

Regenerative medicine aims to restore diseased or damaged tissue using the body's own cells in order to overcome the shortage of donated organs and the risk associated with their rejection (Atala 2009). The use of stem cells from foetal, cord blood and extraembryonic tissues for regenerative medicine applications has increased over the past few years. However, the surprising picture that has emerged is that cell replacement is probably not the major mechanism by which cell therapy confers functional benefit. Rather, stem cells act beneficially by exerting trophic effects on host tissues. Moreover, because they can be expanded to very large numbers compared with adult stem cells, they are ideal candidates for seeding scaffolds and matrices used for tissue engineering applications such as the repair of hollow and solid organs. In this section, we will consider some of the therapeutic applications FSCs have been put to in pre-clinical studies for repairing diseased or damaged tissue as well as in cancer treatment (summarized examples are listed in table 2).

Table 2.

Examples of therapeutic applications of foetal stem cells.

cell type cell origin treated recipient regenerated tissue method of cell delivery disease treated outcome references
foetal tissues
blood and bone marrow human oim mice bone intrauterine transplantation osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) transplantation resulted in decrease in fractures, increased bone strength, thickness and length. Transplanted cells were found clustered in areas of active bone formation Guillot et al. (2008a) and unpublished data
human postnatal scid/mdx dystrophic mouse model/prenatal Mdx dystrophic mice muscle intra-arterial delivery into post-natal mice/intrauterine transplantation using intramuscular, intravascular and intraperitoneal delivery of cells into pre-natal mice Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) galectin-1-exposed foetal MSCs formed fourfold more human muscle fibres in post-natal scid/mdx mice than non-stimulated cells. In pre-natal immunocompetant mdx mice, intravascular delivery led to demise of mice, intraperitoneal delivery led to systemic spread of cells and intramuscular injections resulted in local engraftment. The cells differentiated at low level into skeletal and myocardial muscle but not at a curative level Chan et al. (2006, 2007)
liver human human foetus diagnosed with severe OI bone intrauterine transplantation OI cell engraftment of bone despite the donor cells being HLA-mismatched with recipient. Bone histology showed regularly arranged and configured bone trabeculae Le Blanc et al. (2005)
pancreas human sheep pancreas intrauterine transplantation type II diabetes the cells functionally engrafted in the pancreas in 50% of sheep. The engrafted cells differentiated and were able to secrete insulin Ersek et al. (2010)
extraembryonic
cord blood human human bone marrow systematic administration malignant and non-malignant blood disorders used in the treatment of leukaemia/cancer, Fanconi anaemia, severe aplastic anaemia, myelodysplastic syndrome and other disorders Broxmeyer (2010)
human mouse pancreas intra peritoneal type II diabetes cord blood stem cells introduced into streptozotocin-induced diabetic mouse model differentiated into functional insulin-producing cells and eliminated hyperglycaemia Zhao et al. (2006)
Wharton's Jelly human rat brain injection into the brain striatum Parkinson's disease the cells ameliorated apomorphine-induced rotations in a rat model of Parkinson's disease Weiss et al. (2006)
amniotic fluid sheep sheep muscle cells seeded on collagen hydrogel and placed on intestinal cellular graft partial diaphragmatic replacement diaphragmatic hernia recurrence was significantly higher in animals that did not receive the cell grafts Fuchs et al. (2004)
rat rat smooth muscle cells injected into site of injury wound healing of injured bladder cells prevented cryo-injury-induced hypertrophy of surviving bladder smooth muscle cells but failed to differentiate specifically to smooth muscle De Coppi et al. (2007a)
mouse mouse brain intra ventricular injection focal cerebral ischaemia reperfusion injury the cells significantly reversed neurological deficits in the treated animals Rehni et al. (2007)
human mouse lung systematic administration lung injury AFS cells exhibited a strong tissue engraftment in a mouse lung injury model and expressed specific alveolar and bronchiolar epithelial markers Carraro et al. (2008)
human rat heart intramyocardial injection myocardial infarction treated animals showed a preservation of the infarcted thickness, attenuation of left ventricle remodelling, a higher vascular density and general improvement of cardiac function Yeh et al. (2010)
placenta human amnion AEC mouse brain intracranial injection Parkinson's disease cells transplanted into a mouse model of Parkinson's disease differentiated into neuron, astrocyte and oligodendrocyte and promoted endogenous neurogenesis Kong et al. (2008)
human amnion MSC rat heart intramyocardial injection myocardial infarction cells integrated into normal and infarcted rat cardiac tissue where they differentiated into cardiomyocyte-like cells and resulted in considerable improvements to ventricular function, capillary density and scar tissue Zhao et al. (2005), Ventura et al. (2007)

3.1. Bone

Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is characterized by osteopenia and bone fragility due to abnormal collagen production caused by mutations in the α chains of collagen type I. First-trimester allogeneic HLA-mismatched male foetal liver MSCs were transplanted in utero into a female foetus diagnosed with severe OI. Bone biopsy showed regularly arranged and configured bone trabeculae and no adverse immune reaction was observed (Le Blanc et al. 2005). Using a mouse model of OI, our group has shown that in utero transplantation of foetal blood MSCs ameliorated the disease phenotype, producing a clinically relevant two-thirds reduction in fracture incidence along with an improvement in bone structure and mechanical properties (Guillot et al. 2008a). Foetal bone marrow MSCs loaded on a highly porous scaffold were able to reach confluence within the scaffold more quickly than umbilical cord and adult MSCs. Furthermore, they demonstrated higher in vitro and in vivo osteogenic differentiation capacity, highlighting their suitability for bone tissue engineering applications (Zhang et al. 2009).

3.2. Muscle

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is an X-linked myopathy affecting one in 3500 boys. The main genetic defect leads to absence of dystrophin, resulting in muscle damage and wasting. The affected boys become wheelchair-bound by 12 years of age and succumb to respiratory failure or cardiopmyopathy by the third or forth decade of life (Manzur & Muntoni 2009). The main animal model for studying DMD is the mdx mouse that has a premature stop codon resulting in a termination in exon 23 of the dystrophin gene (Grounds et al. 2008). Galectin-1-treated foetal blood and bone marrow MSCs, transplanted into postnatal severe combined immunodeficiency/dystrophic mice (scid/mdx) as well immunodeficient mice whose muscle was induced to regenerate by cryodamage, formed fourfold more human muscle fibres than non-stimulated MSCs (Chan et al. 2006). Intrauterine transplantation of foetal MSCs into immunocompetent E14-16 mdx mice resulted in widespread long-term engraftment in multiple organs with a predilection for muscle compared with non-muscle tissues. However, the engraftment level observed (0.5–1%) falls significantly below the levels required for functional improvement in DMD. The low engraftment might be linked to an absence of muscle pathology at the time of transplantation (Chan et al. 2007).

AFS cells have been used in an ovine model of diaphragmatic hernia: repair of the muscle deficit using grafts engineered with autologous mesenchymal amniocytes leads to better structural and functional results than equivalent foetal myoblast-based and acellular grafts (Fuchs et al. 2004; Kunisaki et al. 2006). In a rat model of bladder cryo-injury, AFS cells also show the ability to differentiate into smooth muscle and to prevent the compensatory hypertrophy of surviving smooth muscle cells (De Coppi et al. 2007b).

Human AFS cells, transplanted into an immune-competent and ciclosporin immune-suppressed rat model of myocardial infarction, were rejected probably because of the expression of B7 co-stimulatory molecules as well as macrophage marker CD68. Furthermore, chondro-osteogenic cell masses were observed in the infarcted hearts of some of the transplanted animals (Chiavegato et al. 2007). However, in another study it was found that these masses occurred independently of AFS cell injection and that the cells did not increase the presence of these masses (Delo et al. 2010).

Human AMSCs are able not only to express cardiac-specific genes under specific culture conditions, but also to integrate into normal and infarcted rat cardiac tissue where they differentiate into cardiomyocyte-like cells (Zhao et al. 2005). The cells result in considerable improvements to ventricular function, capillary density and scar tissue (Ventura et al. 2007) and similar findings have been reported using native rat AMSCs (Fujimoto et al. 2009). Stem cells derived from pre-natal chorionic villi were also successfully engineered into a living autologous heart valve, which could have postnatal applications for repairing congenital cardiac malformations (Schmidt et al. 2006).

3.3. Kidney

In a mouse model of collagen deficiency characterized by abnormal collagen deposition in renal glomeruli (Phillips et al. 2002; Brodeur et al. 2007), we recently showed that intrauterine transplantation of foetal blood MSCs led to a reduction of abnormal homotrimeric collagen type I deposition in the glomeruli of 4–12 week old col1α2-deficient mice. Furthermore, we showed that the damaged kidneys preferentially recruited donor cells in the glomeruli. The study supports the feasibility of pre-natal treatment for renal diseases such as Alport syndrome and the polycystic kidney diseases (Guillot et al. 2008b).

Acute tubular necrosis could also be potentially treated with foetal cells. Human AFS cells injected into an immunodeficient mouse model of the disease decreased the number of damaged tubules and reduced apoptosis. The cells also promoted the proliferation of tubular epithelial cells and appeared to have a beneficial immunomodulatory effect (Perin et al. 2010).

3.4. Lung

Human AFS cells injected into the tail vein of nude mice following hyperoxia injury show the capacity to home to the lung and engraft. They also expressed specific alveolar and bronchiolar epithelial markers (e.g. TFF1, SPC and CC10; Carraro et al. 2008).

AECs and AMSCs from either human or mouse have been used in a mouse model of bleomycin-induced lung injury and shown to cause a reduction in severity of lung fibrosis. This occurs regardless of cell source (allogeneic or xenogeneic) or administration route (systemic, intravenous or intraperitoneal; local, intratracheal; Cargnoni et al. 2009).

3.5. Liver

Second-trimester foetal liver cells, enriched for CD326 (hepatocyte progenitor marker) and labelled with Tc-d,l-hexamethyl-propylene-amine oxime (Tc-HMPAO) were infused into the hepatic artery of 25 patients with end stage liver cirrhosis. The cells restored the lost liver function in the patients without provoking an immune reaction, probably because of the absence of HLA class II expression of the infused cells (Khan et al. 2010).

Human AECs can secrete albumin in culture and, when β-galactosidase-tagged AECs were transplanted into immunodeficient mice, the cells integrated into the liver parenchyma and could be detected until day 7 post transplant (duration of study; Sakuragawa et al. 2000). In another study, the engrafted cells resulted in the detection of human α-1 antitrypsin in the serum of recipient animals, confirming that AECs are capable of performing this important hepatic function in vivo (Miki & Strom 2006).

3.6. Brain

Human Wharton's jelly MSCs ameliorate apomorphine-induced behavioural deficits in a hemiparkinsonian rat model (Weiss et al. 2006). There was a significant decrease in apomorphine-induced rotations at four weeks continuing up to 12 weeks post transplantation in Parkinson's disease (PD) rats that received human Wharton's jelly MSCs transplants compared with the PD rats that received a sham transplant. The behavioural findings correlated with the numbers of tyrosine hydroxylase-positive cell bodies observed in the midbrain following sacrifice at 12 weeks, indicating a ‘rescue from a distance’ phenomenon. One explanation for this effect may be that Wharton's jelly MSCs synthesize glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), a potent survival factor for dopaminergic neurons, as well as other trophic factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and ciliary neurotrophic factor. In another report, Wharton's jelly MSCs were first induced towards dopaminergic neurons using neuron-conditioned media, sonic hedgehog and fibroblast growth factor 8, and then transplanted into hemiparkinsonian rats (Fu et al. 2006). Despite the fact that the rats were not immune suppressed, Wharton's jelly MSCs were identified five months later and prevented the progressive degeneration/behavioural deterioration seen in control rats with unilateral lesions. Similarly, rat Wharton's jelly cells transplanted into the brains of rats with global cerebral ischaemia caused by cardiac arrest and resuscitation significantly reduced neuronal loss, apparently owing to a rescue phenomenon (Jomura et al. 2007). Lund et al. administered Wharton's jelly MSCs into the eyes of a rodent model of retinal disease. Here, Wharton's jelly MSCs were compared with bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) and placental stem cells. They reported that the Wharton's jelly MSCs exhibited the best histological evidence of photoreceptor rescue with increased production of trophic factors such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor and fibroblast growth factor 2 (Lund et al. 2007). Interestingly, Wharton's jelly MSCs transplanted into the vitreous demonstrated a rescue effect, indicating that they could enhance the survival of photoreceptor cells without being in close proximity to them. This effect was presumably the result of diffusible growth factors.

Very similar findings have also been reported for AECs that confer neuroprotection and functional recovery in animal models of Parkinson's disease (Bankiewicz et al. 1994; Kakishita et al. 2000, 2003; Kong et al. 2008) and ischaemia (Liu et al. 2008). The observed therapeutic effects are probably mediated by secretion of diffusible factors, including neurotransmitters (Elwan & Sakuragawa 1997; Sakuragawa et al. 1997, 2001) and neurotrophic and growth factors (Koizumi et al. 2000; Uchida et al. 2000).

AFS cells can harbour trophic and protective effects in the central and the peripheral nervous systems. Pan et al. (2006, 2007, 2009) showed that AFS cells facilitate peripheral nerve regeneration after injury, particularly if accompanied with suppressors of inflammatory cytokines such as fermented soya bean extracts. After transplantation into the striatum, AFS cells are capable of surviving and integrating in the rat adult brain and can migrate towards areas of ischaemic damage (Cipriani et al. 2007). Moreover, the intra-ventricular administration of AFS cells in mice with focal cerebral ischaemia–reperfusion injuries significantly reverses neurological deficits in the treated animals (Rehni et al. 2007).

3.7. Cancer therapy

HSCs from bone marrow or umbilical cord blood have long been used to re-establish the haematopoietic system following radiation and/or chemotherapy (Osawa et al. 1996; Bhatia et al. 1997). More recently, research has shown that MSCs are attracted to tumours because the latter often act as unresolved wounds producing a continuous source of chemoattractant inflammatory mediators. This property is being exploited by using exogenously delivered MSCs as vehicles for delivering anti-cancer molecules to tumours (Loebinger & Janes 2010). Wharton's jelly cells, like neural stem cells and MSCs (Aboody et al. 2000; Studeny et al. 2004), appear to migrate to areas of tumour growth. Human breast carcinoma cells were intravenously injected into SCID mice, followed by intravenous transplantation of fluorescently labelled Wharton's jelly MSCs. One week after transplant Wharton's jelly MSCs were found near or within lung tumours and not in other tissues. They were engineered to express human interferon beta and were administered intravenously into SCID mice bearing tumours. This treatment significantly reduced the tumour burden (Rachakatla et al. 2007). Similarly, human umbilical cord blood-derived MSCs (UCB–MSCs) have been used to deliver a secretable trimeric form of tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (stTRAIL), via adenoviral transduction mediated by cell-permeable peptides, to human glioma cells in nude mice. The genetically modified cells showed greater efficacy in terms of inhibiting tumour growth and prolonging the survival of glioma-bearing mice compared with direct injection of adenovirus encoding the stTRAIL gene into the tumour mass (Kim et al. 2008).

4. Use of FSCs for reprogramming

The major advantage of human ES cells over other stem cell types is their capacity to differentiate into lineages from the three germ layers. However, there are two major objections to their use. The moral objection is that their derivation requires the destruction of embryos. The practical objection is that they have a limited clinical application as they can only be used in an allogeneic fashion. This is also true for some foetal tissues such as liver and bone marrow. However, extraembryonic tissues can be used autologously.

Thus, it was seen as advantageous to develop a method of creating ES-like cells from somatic cells. Early attempts at achieving this were nuclear transplantation and fusion of somatic cells and ES cells (Jaenisch 2009). However, a considerable step forward was the generation of the induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells. The production of iPS cells with quasi-identical genetic and functional properties offers the possibility to bypass both moral conflicts and different genetic background inherent to the technologies mentioned above. iPS are developed from a non-pluripotent cell, usually an adult somatic cell, by causing a forced expression of several genetic sequences and were first produced in 2006 by Takahashi & Yamanaka from mouse somatic cells. The key genes Oct-4, the transcription factor Sox2, c-Myc protooncogene protein and Klf4 (Krueppel-like factor 4) were sufficient to reprogramme fibroblasts to cells closely resembling ES cells (Takahashi & Yamanaka 2006; Takahashi et al. 2007).

Despite the high similarity between iPS and ES cells, tumour formation in iPS cell chimeric mice was high, presumably because of the expression of c-Myc in iPS cell-derived somatic cells (Maherali et al. 2007). Thomson et al. showed that c-Myc was not necessary as they were able to generate iPS cells using Oct-4, Sox2, Nanog and Lin28 using a lentiviral system (Yu et al. 2007). More recently, it was shown that human fibroblasts cells can be used to generate iPS cells if transduced with Oct-4 and Sox2 only in the presence of valproic acid (Huangfu et al. 2008).

Terminally differentiated cells might not be the ideal candidate for iPS cell generation because a greater number of steps could be required to ‘reprogramme’ their genome than somatic stem cells. Kim et al. (2009a,b) have shown that it is possible to generate iPS cells by transducing adult mouse neural stem cells (NSCs) and human foetal NSCs with Oct-4 only. Furthermore, when human adipose MSCs were used, they were reprogrammed more efficiently than fibroblasts (Sun et al. 2009).

Few reports have also emerged on the use of cord and extra ES cells for iPS generation. Galende et al. used terminally differentiated amniotic fluid cells as candidates for reprogramming and found that the iPS cell colonies were generated twice as fast, yielding nearly a 200 per cent increase in number compared with cultured adult skin cells. However, they did not provide absolute efficiency data (Galende et al. 2009). Li et al. reprogrammed human amniotic fluid-derived cells (hAFDCs) with efficiencies varying from 0.059 to 1.525 per cent. The iPS colonies generated expressed pluripotency markers such as Oct-4, Sox2 and SSEA 4 and they maintained a normal karyotype (Li et al. 2009). Wharton's jelly cells and term placenta cells have also been used, giving reprogramming efficiencies of 0.4 per cent and 0.1 per cent, respectively, which compare rather well with efficiencies reported for adult fibroblasts (less than 0.01%). The generated iPS cell colonies expressed several pluripotency markers, formed EB and, when injected into nude mice, they generated teratoma-containing derivates of the three germ layers (Cai et al. 2010). Giorgetti et al. selected CD133+ (haematopoietic stem and progenitor cell marker) cord blood cells and managed to reprogramme them by retroviral transduction with Oct-4 and Sox2 only without needing additional chemical compounds. iPS cell colonies derived from CD133+ cord blood cells (expressing pluripotency markers and capable of forming EB and teratomas) were generated in two weeks whereas no colonies were obtained with control keratinocytes or fibroblasts using the two factors only (Giorgetti et al. 2009, 2010).

CD133+ cord blood cells and foetal NSCs already have a baseline level expression of Oct-4 and/or Sox2 and that, along with a generally more permissive chromatin organization, might be the key to their greater reprogramming efficiency compared with adult cells.

5. Conclusion

Human FSCs can be isolated from foetal organs or extraembryonic sources. They have the advantage of rapid proliferation, stable karyotype and low or negligible immunogenicity. Unlike ES cells, they do not form teratomas in vivo and have far fewer ethical concerns as they are mostly obtained from tissues that would otherwise be discarded. Many of these cells seem to express some of the same pluipotency markers found in ES cells, a feature largely absent from most adult-derived stem cells. They also have the further advantage over adult stem cells of senescing much later and being more readily amenable to genetic modification.

All of these features make them valuable for potential therapy applications. Thus far they have been used in pre-clinical settings to treat a variety of diseases such as osteogenesis imperfecta, congenital diaphragmatic hernia, Parkinson's disease and cancer with encouraging results. Finally, their usefulness for iPS generation is very likely to expand their future clinical use even further.

Footnotes

One contribution to a Theme Supplement ‘Translation and commercialization of regenerative medicines’.

References

  1. Abdallah B. M., Kassem M. 2008. Human mesenchymal stem cells: from basic biology to clinical applications. Gene Ther. 15, 109–116. ( 10.1038/sj.gt.3303067) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aboody K. S., et al. 2000. Neural stem cells display extensive tropism for pathology in adult brain: evidence from intracranial gliomas. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 12 846–12 851. ( 10.1073/pnas.97.23.12846) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Alaminos M., Perez-Kohler B., Garzon I., Garcia-Honduvilla N., Romero B., Campos A., Bujan J. 2010. Transdifferentiation potentiality of human Wharton's jelly stem cells towards vascular endothelial cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 223, 640–647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Almeida-Porada G., El Shabrawy D., Porada C., Zanjani E. 2002. Differentiative potential of human metanephric mesenchymal cells. Exp. Hematol. 30, 1454–1462. ( 10.1016/S0301-472X(02)00967-0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Alviano F., et al. 2007. Term amniotic membrane is a high throughput source for multipotent mesenchymal stem cells with the ability to differentiate into endothelial cells in vitro. BMC Dev. Biol. 7, 11–11. ( 10.1186/1471-213X-7-11) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Andrews P. W., Matin M. M., Bahrami A. R., Damjanov I., Gokhale P., Draper J. S. 2005. Embryonic stem (ES) cells and embryonal carcinoma (EC) cells: opposite sides of the same coin. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 33, 1526–1530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Anzalone R., Iacono M. L., Corrao S., Magno F., Loria T., Cappello F., Zummo G., Farina F., La Rocca G. 2010. New emerging potentials for human Wharton's jelly mesenchymal stem cells: immunological features and hepatocyte-like differentiative capacity. Stem Cells Dev. 19, 423–438. ( 10.1089/scd.2009.0299) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Atala A. 2009. Engineering organs. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 20, 575–592. ( 10.1016/j.copbio.2009.10.003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bailo M., et al. 2004. Engraftment potential of human amnion and chorion cells derived from term placenta. Transplantation 78, 1439–1448. ( 10.1097/01.TP.0000144606.84234.49) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ballen K. K. 2005. New trends in umbilical cord blood transplantation. Blood 105, 3786–3792. ( 10.1182/blood-2004-10-4125) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bankiewicz K. S., Palmatier M., Plunkett R. J., Cummins A., Oldfield E. H. 1994. Reversal of hemiparkinsonian syndrome in nonhuman primates by amnion implantation into caudate nucleus. J. Neurosurg. 81, 869–876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Battula V. L., et al. 2007. Human placenta and bone marrow derived MSC cultured in serum-free, b-FGF-containing medium express cell surface frizzled-9 and SSEA-4 and give rise to multilineage differentiation. Differentiation 75, 279–291. ( 10.1111/j.1432-0436.2006.00139.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bhatia M., Wang J., Kapp U., Bonnet D., Dick J. 1997. Purification of primitive human hematopoietic cells capable of repopulating immune-deficient mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 5320–5325. ( 10.1073/pnas.94.10.5320) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bieback K., Kern S., Kluter H., Eichler H. 2004. Critical parameters for the isolation of mesenchymal stem cells from umbilical cord blood. Stem Cells 22, 625–634. ( 10.1634/stemcells.22-4-625) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bolisetty S., Koh T. H. H. G., Hammond S., Panaretto K., Whitehall J. 2002. Correlation of umbilical cord weight with birth weight. Arch. Dis. Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 86, F140 ( 10.1136/fn.86.2.F140-a) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Brodeur A., Wirth D., Franklin C., Reneker L., Miner J., Phillips C. 2007. Type I collagen glomerulopathy: postnatal collagen deposition follows glomerular maturation. Kidney Int. 71, 985–993. ( 10.1038/sj.ki.5002173) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Brooke G., et al. 2009. Manufacturing of human placenta-derived mesenchymal stem cells for clinical trials. Br. J. Haematol. 144, 571–579. ( 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07492.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Broxmeyer H. 2010. Umbilical cord transplantation: epilogue. Semin. Hematol. 47, 97–103. ( 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2009.10.002) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Broxmeyer H. E., Douglas G. W., Hangoc G., Cooper S., Bard J., English D., Arny M., Thomas L., Boyse E. A. 1989. Human umbilical cord blood as a potential source of transplantable hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 86, 3828–3832. ( 10.1073/pnas.86.10.3828) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Brunstein C. G., Setubal D. C., Wagner J. E. 2007. Expanding the role of umbilical cord blood transplantation. Br. J. Haematol. 137, 20–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Cai J., et al. 2010. Generation of human induced pluripotent stem cells from umbilical cord matrix and amniotic membrane mesenchymal cells. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 11 227–11 234. ( 10.1074/jbc.M109.086389) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Campagnoli C., Roberts I., Kumar S., Bennett P., Bellantuono I., Fisk N. 2001. Identification of mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells in human first-trimester fetal blood, liver, and bone marrow. Blood 98, 2396–2402. ( 10.1182/blood.V98.8.2396) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Cananzi M., Atala A., De Coppi P. 2009. Stem cells derived from amniotic fluid: new potentials in regenerative medicine. Reprod. Biomed. Online 18(Suppl. 1), 17–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Cargnoni A., et al. 2009. Transplantation of allogeneic and xenogeneic placenta-derived cells reduces bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis. Cell Transplant. 18, 405–422. ( 10.3727/096368909788809857) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Carraro G., et al. 2008. Human amniotic fluid stem cells can integrate and differentiate into epithelial lung lineages. Stem Cells 26, 2902–2911. ( 10.1634/stemcells.2008-0090) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Castrechini N. M., Murthi P., Gude N. M., Erwich J. J., Gronthos S., Zannettino A., Brennecke S. P., Kalionis B. 2010. Mesenchymal stem cells in human placental chorionic villi reside in a vascular niche. Placenta 31, 203–212. ( 10.1016/j.placenta.2009.12.006) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Chambers I., et al. 2007. Nanog safeguards pluripotency and mediates germline development. Nature 450, 1230–1234. ( 10.1038/nature06403) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Chan J., O'Donoghue K., de la Fuente J., Roberts I. A., Kumar S., Morgan J. E., Fisk N. M. 2005. Human fetal mesenchymal stem cells as vehicles for gene delivery. Stem Cells 23, 93–102. ( 10.1634/stemcells.2004-0138) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Chan J., et al. 2006. Galectin-1 induces skeletal muscle differentiation in human fetal mesenchymal stem cells and increases muscle regeneration. Stem Cells 24, 1879–1891. ( 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0564) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Chan J., Waddington S., O'Donoghue K., Kurata H., Guillot P., Gotherstrom C., Themis M., Morgan J., Fisk N. 2007. Widespread distribution and muscle differentiation of human fetal mesenchymal stem cells after intrauterine transplantation in dystrophic mdx mouse. Stem Cells 25, 875–884. ( 10.1634/stemcells.2006-0694) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Chiavegato A., et al. 2007. Human amniotic fluid-derived stem cells are rejected after transplantation in the myocardium of normal, ischemic, immuno-suppressed or immuno-deficient rat. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 42, 746–759. ( 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2006.12.008) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Chien C., Yen B., Lee F., Lai T., Chen Y., Chan S., Huang H. 2006. In vitro differentiation of human placenta-derived multipotent cells into hepatocyte-like cells. Stem Cells 24, 1759–1768. ( 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0521) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Cipriani S., Bonini D., Marchina E., Balgkouranidou I., Caimi L., Grassi Zucconi G., Barlati S. 2007. Mesenchymal cells from human amniotic fluid survive and migrate after transplantation into adult rat brain. Cell Biol. Int. 31, 845–850. ( 10.1016/j.cellbi.2007.01.037) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Clapp D. W., Freie B., Lee W. H., Zhang Y. Y. 1995. Molecular evidence that in situ-transduced fetal liver hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells give rise to medullary hematopoiesis in adult rats. Blood 86, 2113–2122. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Crane J., Cheung S. 1988. An embryogenic model to explain cytogenetic inconsistencies observed in chorionic villus versus fetal tissue. Prenat. Diagn. 8, 119–129. ( 10.1002/pd.1970080206) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Cumano A., Ferraz J. C., Klaine M., Di Santo J. P., Godin I. 2001. Intraembryonic, but not yolk sac hematopoietic precursors, isolated before circulation, provide long-term multilineage reconstitution. Immunity 15, 477–485. ( 10.1016/S1074-7613(01)00190-X) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Dan Y., Riehle K., Lazaro C., Teoh N., Haque J., Campbell J., Fausto N. 2006. Isolation of multipotent progenitor cells from human fetal liver capable of differentiating into liver and mesenchymal lineages. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 9912–9917. ( 10.1073/pnas.0603824103) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Da Sacco S., Sedrakyan S., Boldrin F., Giuliani S., Parnigotto P., Habibian R., Warburton D., De Filippo R. E., Perin L. 2010. Human amniotic fluid as a potential new source of organ specific precursor cells for future regenerative medicine applications. J. Urol. 183, 1193–1200. ( 10.1016/j.juro.2009.11.006) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. De Coppi P., et al. 2007a Isolation of amniotic stem cell lines with potential for therapy. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 100–106. ( 10.1038/nbt1274) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. De Coppi P., et al. 2007b Amniotic fluid and bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells can be converted to smooth muscle cells in the cryo-injured rat bladder and prevent compensatory hypertrophy of surviving smooth muscle cells. J. Urol. 177, 369–376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Degistirici O., Jager M., Knipper A. 2008. Applicability of cord blood-derived unrestricted somatic stem cells in tissue engineering concepts. Cell Prolif. 41, 421–440. ( 10.1111/j.1365-2184.2008.00536.x) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. de la Fuente J., Fisk N., O'Donoghue K., Chan J., Kumar S., Roberts I. 2003. a2b1 and a4b1 integrins mediate the homing of mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells during fetal life. Haematol. J. 4, 13. [Google Scholar]
  43. Delaney C., Heimfeld S., Brashem-Stein C., Voorhies H., Manger R., Bernstein I. 2010. Notch-mediated expansion of human cord blood progenitor cells capable of rapid myeloid reconstitution. Nat. Med. 16, 232–236. ( 10.1038/nm.2080) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Delo D., et al. 2010. Calcification after myocardial infarction is independent of amniotic fluid stem cell injection. Cardiovasc. Pathol. ( 10.1089/scd.2008.0028) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Ditadi A., et al. 2009. Human and murine amniotic fluid c-Kit+ Lin cells display hematopoietic activity. Blood 113, 3953–3960. ( 10.1182/blood-2008-10-182105) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Elwan M. A., Sakuragawa N. 1997. Evidence for synthesis and release of catecholamines by human amniotic epithelial cells. Neuroreport 8, 3435–3438. ( 10.1097/00001756-199711100-00004) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Ersek A., Pixley J., Goodrich A., Porada C., Almeida-Porada G., Thain D., Zanjani E. 2010. Persistent circulating human insulin in sheep transplanted in utero with human mesenchymal stem cells. Exp. Hematol. 38, 311–320. ( 10.1016/j.exphem.2010.02.005) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Fong C. Y., Richards M., Manasi N., Biswas A., Bongso A. 2007. Comparative growth behaviour and characterization of stem cells from human Wharton's jelly. Reprod. Biomed. Online 15, 708–718. ( 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60539-1) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Fu Y.-S., Cheng Y.-C., Lin M.-Y. A., Cheng H., Chu P.-M., Chou S.-C., Shih Y.-H., Ko M.-H., Sung S. 2006. Conversion of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in Wharton's jelly to dopaminergic neurons in vitro: potential therapeutic application for Parkinsonism. Stem Cells 24, 115–124. ( 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0053) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Fuchs J. R., Kaviani A., Oh J.-T., LaVan D., Udagawa T., Jennings R. W., Wilson J. M., Fauza D. O. 2004. Diaphragmatic reconstruction with autologous tendon engineered from mesenchymal amniocytes. J. Pediatr. Surg. 39, 834–838. ( 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2004.02.014) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Fujimoto K. L., Miki T., Liu L. J., Hashizume R., Strom S. C., Wagner W. R., Keller B. B., Tobita K. 2009. Naive rat amnion-derived cell transplantation improved left ventricular function and reduced myocardial scar of postinfarcted heart. Cell Transplant. 18, 477–486. ( 10.3727/096368909788809785) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Fukuchi Y., Nakajima H., Sugiyama D., Hirose I., Kitamura T., Tsuji K. 2004. Human placenta-derived cells have mesenchymal stem/progenitor cell potential. Stem Cells 22, 649–658. ( 10.1634/stemcells.22-5-649) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Galende E., et al. 2009. Amniotic fluid cells are more efficiently reprogrammed to pluripotency than adult cells. Cell Reprogram 12, 117–125. ( 10.1089/cell.2009.0077) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Gammaitoni L., et al. 2004. Elevated telomerase activity and minimal telomere loss in cord blood long-term cultures with extensive stem cell replication. Blood 103, 4440–4448. ( 10.1182/blood-2003-09-3079) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Giorgetti A., et al. 2009. Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells from human cord blood using OCT4 and SOX2. Cell Stem Cell 5, 353–357. ( 10.1016/j.stem.2009.09.008) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Giorgetti A., Montserrat N., Rodriguez-Piza I., Azqueta C., Veiga A., Izpisua Belmonte J. C. 2010. Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells from human cord blood cells with only two factors: Oct4 and Sox2. Nat. Protoc. 5, 811–820. ( 10.1038/nprot.2010.16) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Gosden C., Brock D. J. 1978. Combined use of alphafetoprotein and amniotic fluid cell morphology in early prenatal diagnosis of fetal abnormalities. J. Med. Genet. 15, 262–270. ( 10.1136/jmg.15.4.262) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Gotherstrom C., Ringden O., Tammik C., Zetterberg E., Westgren M., Le Blanc K. 2004. Immunologic properties of human fetal mesenchymal stem cells. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 190, 239–245. ( 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.07.022) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Grounds M. D., Radley H. G., Lynch G. S., Nagaraju K., De Luca A. 2008. Towards developing standard operating procedures for pre-clinical testing in the mdx mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Neurobiol. Dis. 31, 1–19. ( 10.1016/j.nbd.2008.03.008) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Gucciardo L., Lories R., Ochsenbein-Kolble N., Done E., Zwijsen A., Deprest J. 2009. Fetal mesenchymal stem cells: isolation, properties and potential use in perinatology and regenerative medicine. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 116, 166–172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Guillot P. V., O'Donoghue K., Kurata H., Fisk N. M. 2006. Fetal stem cells: betwixt and between. Semin. Reprod. Med. 24, 340–347. ( 10.1055/s-2006-952149) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Guillot P. V., Cui W., Fisk N. M., Polak D. J. 2007a Stem cell differentiation and expansion for clinical applications of tissue engineering. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 11, 935–944. ( 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2007.00106.x) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Guillot P. V., Gotherstrom C., Chan J., Kurata H., Fisk N. M. 2007b Human first-trimester fetal MSC express pluripotency markers and grow faster and have longer telomeres than adult MSC. Stem Cells 25, 646–654. ( 10.1634/stemcells.2006-0208) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Guillot P., et al. 2008a Intrauterine transplantation of human fetal mesenchymal stem cells from first-trimester blood repairs bone and reduces fractures in osteogenesis imperfecta mice. Blood 111, 1717–1725. ( 10.1182/blood-2007-08-105809) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Guillot P., Cook H., Pusey C., Fisk N., Harten S., Moss J., Shore I., Bou-Gharios G. 2008b Transplantation of human fetal mesenchymal stem cells improves glomerulopathy in a collagen type I alpha 2-deficient mouse. J. Pathol. 214, 627–636. ( 10.1002/path.2325) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Habich A., Jurga M., Markiewicz I., Lukomska B., Bany-Laszewicz U., Domanska-Janik K. 2006. Early appearance of stem/progenitor cells with neural-like characteristics in human cord blood mononuclear fraction cultured in vitro. Exp. Hematol. 34, 914–925. ( 10.1016/j.exphem.2006.03.010) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Harrison D., Zhong R., Jordan C., Lemischka I., Astle C. 1997. Relative to adult marrow, fetal liver repopulates nearly five times more effectively long-term than short-term. Exp. Hematol. 25, 293–297. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Horwitz E. M., Gordon P. L., Koo W. K. K., Marx J. C., Neel M. D., McNall R. Y., Muul L., Hofmann T. 2002. Isolated allogeneic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal cells engraft and stimulate growth in children with osteogenesis imperfecta: implications for cell therapy of bone. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 8932–8937. ( 10.1073/pnas.132252399) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Hsieh J. Y., Fu Y. S., Chang S. J., Tsuang Y. H., Wang H. W. 2010. Functional module analysis reveals differential osteogenic and stemness potentials in human mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow and Wharton's jelly of umbilical cord. Stem Cells Dev. ( 10.1089/scd.2009.0485) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Hu Y., Liao L., Wang Q., Ma L., Ma G., Jiang X., Zhao R. C. 2003. Isolation and identification of mesenchymal stem cells from human fetal pancreas. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 141, 342–349. ( 10.1016/S0022-2143(03)00022-2) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Huang H. 2007. Isolation of human placenta-derived multipotent cells and in vitro differentiation into hepatocyte-like cells. Curr. Protoc. Stem Cell Biol. 1, 1E.1 ( 10.1002/9780470151808.sc01e01s1) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Huang G. T., Gronthos S., Shi S. 2009. Mesenchymal stem cells derived from dental tissues vs. those from other sources: their biology and role in regenerative medicine. J. Dent. Res. 88, 792–806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Huangfu D., Osafune K., Maehr R., Guo W., Eijkelenboom A., Chen S., Muhlestein W., Melton D. 2008. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from primary human fibroblasts with only Oct4 and Sox2. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 1269–1275. ( 10.1038/nbt.1502) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Huss R. 2000. Isolation of primary and immortalized CD34-hematopoietic and mesenchymal stem cells from various sources. Stem Cells 18, 1–9. ( 10.1634/stemcells.18-1-1) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Hwang W. Y. K., Samuel M., Tan D., Koh L. P., Lim W., Linn Y. C. 2007. A meta-analysis of unrelated donor umbilical cord blood transplantation versus unrelated donor bone marrow transplantation in adult and pediatric patients. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 13, 444–453. ( 10.1016/j.bbmt.2006.11.005) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Igura K., Zhang X., Takahashi K., Mitsuru A., Yamaguchi S., Takashi T. A. 2004. Isolation and characterization of mesenchymal progenitor cells from chorionic villi of human placenta. Cytotherapy 6, 543–553. ( 10.1080/14653240410005366-1) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Ilancheran S., Michalska A., Peh G., Wallace E. M., Pera M., Manuelpillai U. 2007. Stem cells derived from human fetal membranes display multilineage differentiation potential. Biol. Reprod. 77, 577–588. ( 10.1095/biolreprod.106.055244) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Ilancheran S., Moodley Y., Manuelpillai U. 2009. Human fetal membranes: a source of stem cells for tissue regeneration and repair? Placenta 30, 2–10. ( 10.1016/j.placenta.2008.09.009) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Insausti C., Blanquer M., Bleda P., Iniesta P., Majado M., Castellanos G., Moraleda J. 2010. The amniotic membrane as a source of stem cells. Histol. Histopathol. 25, 91–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. in‘t Anker P. S., et al. 2003a Mesenchymal stem cells in human second-trimester bone marrow, liver, lung, and spleen exhibit a similar immunophenotype but a heterogeneous multilineage differentiation potential. Haematologica 88, 845–852. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. in‘t Anker P. S., Scherjon S. A., Kleijburg-van der Keur C., Noort W. A., Claas F. H., Willemze R., Fibbe W. E., Kanhai H. H. 2003b Amniotic fluid as a novel source of mesenchymal stem cells for therapeutic transplantation. Blood 102, 1548–1549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. in‘t Anker P. S., Scherjon S. A., Kleijburg-van der Keur C., de Groot-Swings G. M., Claas F. H., Fibbe W. E., Kanhai H. H. 2004. Isolation of mesenchymal stem cells of fetal or maternal origin from human placenta. Stem Cells 22, 1338–1345. ( 10.1634/stemcells.2004-0058) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Jaenisch R. 2009. Stem cells, pluripotency and nuclear reprogramming. J. Thromb. Haemost. 7(Suppl. 1), 21–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Javazon E., Beggs K., Flake A. 2004. Mesenchymal stem cells: paradoxes of passaging. Exp. Hematol. 32, 414–425. ( 10.1016/j.exphem.2004.02.004) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Jomura S., Uy M., Mitchell K., Dallasen R., Bode C., Xu Y. 2007. Potential treatment of cerebral global ischemia with Oct-4+ umbilical cord matrix cells. Stem Cells 25, 98–106. ( 10.1634/stemcells.2006-0055) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Jones H. M., Nathrath M., Thomas R. M., Edelman P., Rodeck C. H., Linch D. C. 1994. The effects of gestation on circulating progenitor cells. Br. J. Haematol. 87, 637–639. ( 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1994.tb08329.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Kakishita K., Elwan M. A., Nakao N., Itakura T., Sakuragawa N. 2000. Human amniotic epithelial cells produce dopamine and survive after implantation into the striatum of a rat model of Parkinson's disease: a potential source of donor for transplantation therapy. Exp. Neurol. 165, 27–34. ( 10.1006/exnr.2000.7449) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Kakishita K., Nakao N., Sakuragawa N., Itakura T. 2003. Implantation of human amniotic epithelial cells prevents the degeneration of nigral dopamine neurons in rats with 6-hydroxydopamine lesions. Brain Res. 980, 48–56. ( 10.1016/S0006-8993(03)02875-0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Karahuseyinoglu S., Cinar O., Kilic E., Kara F., Akay G. G., Demiralp D. O., Tukun A., Uckan D., Can A. 2007. Biology of stem cells in human umbilical cord stroma: in situ and in vitro surveys. Stem Cells 25, 319–331. ( 10.1634/stemcells.2006-0286) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Kaviani A., Perry T. E., Dzakovic A., Jennings R. W., Ziegler M. M., Fauza D. O. 2001. The amniotic fluid as a source of cells for fetal tissue engineering. J. Pediatr. Surg. 36, 1662–1665. ( 10.1053/jpsu.2001.27945) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Kennea N., et al. 2009. Differentiation of human fetal mesenchymal stem cells into cells with an oligodendrocyte phenotype. Cell Cycle 8, 1069–1079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Khan A. A., et al. 2010. Human fetal liver derived stem cell transplantation as supportive modality in the management of end stage decompensated liver cirrhosis. Cell Transplant. 19, 409–418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Kim J., Lee Y., Kim H., Hwang K. J., Kwon H. C., Kim S. K., Cho D. J., Kang S. G., You J. 2007. Human amniotic fluid-derived stem cells have characteristics of multipotent stem cells. Cell Prolif. 40, 75–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Kim S. M., et al. 2008. Gene therapy using TRAIL-secreting human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells against intracranial glioma. Cancer Res. 68, 9614–9623. ( 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-0451) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Kim J., et al. 2009a Oct4-induced pluripotency in adult neural stem cells. Cell 136, 411–419. ( 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.023) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Kim J. B., Greber B., Arauzo-Bravo M. J., Meyer J., Park K. I., Zaehres H., Scholer H. R. 2009b Direct reprogramming of human neural stem cells by OCT4. Nature 461, 643–649. ( 10.1038/nature08436) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Klimanskaya I., Chung Y., Becker S., Lu S. J., Lanza R. 2007. Derivation of human embryonic stem cells from single blastomeres. Nat. Protoc. 2, 1963–1972. ( 10.1038/nprot.2007.274) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Koizumi N. J., Inatomi T. J., Sotozono C. J., Fullwood N. J., Quantock A. J., Kinoshita S. 2000. Growth factor mRNA and protein in preserved human amniotic membrane. Curr. Eye. Res. 20, 173–177. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Kolambkar Y. M., Peister A., Soker S., Atala A., Guldberg R. E. 2007. Chondrogenic differentiation of amniotic fluid-derived stem cells. J. Mol. Histol. 38, 405–413. ( 10.1007/s10735-007-9118-1) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Kong X.-Y., et al. 2008. Transplantation of human amniotic cells exerts neuroprotection in MPTP-induced Parkinson disease mice. Brain Res. 1205, 108–115. ( 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.02.040) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Kubo M., Sonoda Y., Muramatsu R., Usui M. 2001. Immunogenicity of human amniotic membrane in experimental xenotransplantation. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 42, 1539–1546. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Kucia M., Zuba-Surma E., Wysoczynski M., Dobrowolska H., Reca R., Ratajczak J., Ratajczak M. 2006. Physiological and pathological consequences of identification of very small embryonic like (VSEL) stem cells in adult bone marrow. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 57(Suppl. 5), 5–18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Kucia M., et al. 2007. Morphological and molecular characterization of novel population of CXCR4+ SSEA-4+ Oct-4+ very small embryonic-like cells purified from human cord blood: preliminary report. Leukemia 21, 297–303. ( 10.1038/sj.leu.2404470) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Kunisaki S. M., Jennings R. W., Fauza D. O. 2006. Fetal cartilage engineering from amniotic mesenchymal progenitor cells. Stem Cells Dev. 15, 245–253. ( 10.1089/scd.2006.15.245) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Kunisaki S. M., Armant M., Kao G. S., Stevenson K., Kim H., Fauza D. O. 2007. Tissue engineering from human mesenchymal amniocytes: a prelude to clinical trials. J. Pediatr. Surg. 42, 974–979. ( 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.01.031) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Kyo S., et al. 1997. Expression of telomerase activity in human chorion. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 241, 498–503. ( 10.1006/bbrc.1997.7767) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Le Blanc K., et al. 2005. Fetal mesenchymal stem-cell engraftment in bone after in utero transplantation in a patient with severe osteogenesis imperfecta. Transplantation 79, 1607–1614. ( 10.1097/01.TP.0000159029.48678.93) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Le Blanc K., et al. 2008. Mesenchymal stem cells for treatment of steroid-resistant, severe, acute graft-versus-host disease: a phase II study. Lancet 371, 1579–1586. ( 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60690-X) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Li C., Zhang W., Jiang X., Mao N. 2007. Human-placenta-derived mesenchymal stem cells inhibit proliferation and function of allogeneic immune cells. Cell Tissue Res. 330, 437–446. ( 10.1007/s00441-007-0504-5) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Li C., et al. 2009. Pluripotency can be rapidly and efficiently induced in human amniotic fluid-derived cells. Hum. Mol. Genet. 18, 4340–4349. ( 10.1093/hmg/ddp386) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Lim F. T. H., Kanhai H. H. H., Falkenburg J. H. F. 2005. Characterization of the human CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cell compartment during the second trimester of pregnancy. Haematologica 90, 173–179. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Liu T., Wu J., Huang Q., Hou Y., Jiang Z., Zang S., Guo L. 2008. Human amniotic epithelial cells ameliorate behavioral dysfunction and reduce infarct size in the rat middle cerebral artery occlusion model. Shock 29, 603–611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Lo B., Parham L. 2009. Ethical issues in stem cell research. Endocr. Rev. 30, 204–213. ( 10.1210/er.2008-0031) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Loebinger M., Janes S. 2010. Stem cells as vectors for antitumour therapy. Thorax 65, 362–369. ( 10.1136/thx.2009.128025) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Lund R. D., et al. 2007. Cells isolated from umbilical cord tissue rescue photoreceptors and visual functions in a rodent model of retinal disease. Stem Cells 25, 602–611. ( 10.1634/stemcells.2006-0308) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. MacKenzie T. C., Campagnoli C., Almeida-Porada G., Fisk N. M., Flake A. W. 2001. Circulating human fetal stromal cells engraft and differentiate in multiple tissues following transplantation into pre-immune fetal lambs. Blood 98, 798. [Google Scholar]
  117. Maherali N., et al. 2007. Directly reprogrammed fibroblasts show global epigenetic remodeling and widespread tissue contribution. Cell Stem Cell 1, 55–70. ( 10.1016/j.stem.2007.05.014) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Manzur A. Y., Muntoni F. 2009. Diagnosis and new treatments in muscular dystrophies. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 80, 706–714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Marcus A., Woodbury D. 2008. Fetal stem cells from extra-embryonic tissues: do not discard. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 12, 730–742. ( 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00221.x) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Mazurier F., Doedens M., Gan O., Dick J. 2003. Rapid myeloerythroid repopulation after intrafemoral transplantation of NOD–SCID mice reveals a new class of human stem cells. Nat. Med. 9, 959–963. ( 10.1038/nm886) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. McElreavey K., Irvine A., Ennis K., McLean W. 1991. Isolation, culture and characterisation of fibroblast-like cells derived from the Wharton's jelly portion of human umbilical cord. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 19, 29S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. McGrath K., Palis J. 2008. Ontogeny of erythropoiesis in the mammalian embryo. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 82, 1–22. ( 10.1016/S0070-2153(07)00001-4) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Miao Z., Jin J., Chen L., Zhu J., Huang W., Zhao J., Qian H., Zhang X. 2006. Isolation of mesenchymal stem cells from human placenta: comparison with human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Biol. Int. 30, 681–687. ( 10.1016/j.cellbi.2006.03.009) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Miki T., Strom S. 2006. Amnion-derived pluripotent/multipotent stem cells. Stem Cell Rev. 2, 133–142. ( 10.1007/s12015-006-0020-0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Miki T., Lehmann T., Cai H., Stolz D., Strom S. 2005. Stem cell characteristics of amniotic epithelial cells. Stem Cells 23, 1549–1559. ( 10.1634/stemcells.2004-0357) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Miki T., Mitamura K., Ross M., Stolz D., Strom S. 2007. Identification of stem cell marker-positive cells by immunofluorescence in term human amnion. J. Reprod. Immunol. 75, 91–96. ( 10.1016/j.jri.2007.03.017) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Miki T., Marongiu F., Dorko K., Ellis E., Strom S. 2010. Isolation of amniotic epithelial stem cells. Curr. Protoc. Stem Cell Biol. 12, 1E.3.1–1E.3.10. ( 10.1002/9780470151808.sc01e03s12) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Mitchell K. E., et al. 2003. Matrix cells from Wharton's jelly form neurons and glia. Stem Cells 21, 50–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Moon J. H., Lee J. R., Jee B. C., Suh C. S., Kim S. H., Lim H. J., Kim H. K. 2008. Successful vitrification of human amnion-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Hum. Reprod. 23, 1760–1770. ( 10.1093/humrep/den202) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Mountford J. 2008. Human embryonic stem cells: origins, characteristics and potential for regenerative therapy. Transfus. Med. 18, 1–12. ( 10.1111/j.1365-3148.2007.00807.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Musina R., Bekchanova E., Belyavskii A., Grinenko T., Sukhikh G. 2007. Umbilical cord blood mesenchymal stem cells. Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. 143, 127–131. ( 10.1007/s10517-007-0032-z) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Nadri S., Soleimani M. 2007. Comparative analysis of mesenchymal stromal cells from murine bone marrow and amniotic fluid. Cytotherapy 9, 729–737. ( 10.1080/14653240701656061) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Nava S., Westgren M., Jaksch M., Tibell A., Broomé U., Ericzon B., Sumitran-Holgersson S. 2005. Characterization of cells in the developing human liver. Differentiation 73, 249–260. ( 10.1111/j.1432-0436.2005.00019.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. O'Donoghue K., Fisk N. M. 2004. Fetal stem cells. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 18, 853–875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Osawa M., Hanada K., Hamada H., Nakauchi H. 1996. Long-term lymphohematopoietic reconstitution by a single CD34-low/negative hematopoietic stem cell. Science 273, 242–245. ( 10.1126/science.273.5272.242) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Owen M., Friedenstein A. J. 1988. Stromal stem cells: marrow-derived osteogenic precursors. Ciba Found. Symp. 136, 42–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Pan H., Yang D., Chiu Y., Lai S., Wang Y., Chang M., Cheng F. 2006. Enhanced regeneration in injured sciatic nerve by human amniotic mesenchymal stem cell. J. Clin. Neurosci. 13, 570–575. ( 10.1016/j.jocn.2005.06.007) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Pan H., Cheng F., Chen C., Lai S., Lee C., Yang D., Chang M., Ho S. 2007. Post-injury regeneration in rat sciatic nerve facilitated by neurotrophic factors secreted by amniotic fluid mesenchymal stem cells. J. Clin. Neurosci. 14, 1089–1098. ( 10.1016/j.jocn.2006.08.008) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Pan H. C., Yang D. Y., Ho S. P., Sheu M. L., Chen C. J., Hwang S. M., Chang M. H., Cheng F. C. 2009. Escalated regeneration in sciatic nerve crush injury by the combined therapy of human amniotic fluid mesenchymal stem cells and fermented soybean extracts, Natto. J. Biomed. Sci. 16, 75 ( 10.1186/1423-0127-16-75) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Pappa K., Anagnou N. 2009. Novel sources of fetal stem cells: where do they fit on the developmental continuum? Regen. Med. 4, 423–433. ( 10.2217/rme.09.12) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Parolini O., et al. 2008. Concise review: isolation and characterization of cells from human term placenta: outcome of the first international Workshop on Placenta Derived Stem Cells. Stem Cells 26, 300–311. ( 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0594) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Parolini O., et al. 2010. Toward cell therapy using placenta-derived cells: disease mechanisms, cell biology, preclinical studies, and regulatory aspects at the round table. Stem Cells Dev. 19, 143–154. ( 10.1089/scd.2009.0404) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Perin L., et al. 2010. Protective effect of human amniotic fluid stem cells in an immunodeficient mouse model of acute tubular necrosis. PLoS ONE 5, e9357 ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0009357) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Phillips C., Pfeiffer B., Luger A., Franklin C. 2002. Novel collagen glomerulopathy in a homotrimeric type I collagen mouse (oim). Kidney Int. 62, 383–391. ( 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00451.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Pittenger M. F., et al. 1999. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science 284, 143–147. ( 10.1126/science.284.5411.143) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Poloni A., et al. 2008. Characterization and expansion of mesenchymal progenitor cells from first-trimester chorionic villi of human placenta. Cytotherapy 10, 690–697. ( 10.1080/14653240802419310) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Porada C. D., Zanjani E. D., Almeida-Porad G. 2006. Adult mesenchymal stem cells: a pluripotent population with multiple applications. Curr. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 1, 365–369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Portmann-Lanz C. B., Schoeberlein A., Huber A., Sager R., Malek A., Holzgreve W., Surbek D. V. 2006. Placental mesenchymal stem cells as potential autologous graft for pre- and perinatal neuroregeneration. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 194, 664–673. ( 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.01.101) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Portmann-Lanz C. B., Schoeberlein A., Portmann R., Mohr S., Rollini P., Sager R., Surbek D. 2010. Turning placenta into brain: placental mesenchymal stem cells differentiate into neurons and oligodendrocytes. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 202, 294.e1–294.e11. ( 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.10.893) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Pranke P., Hendrikx J., Debnath G., Alespeiti G., Rubinstein P., Nardi N., Visser J. 2005. Immunophenotype of hematopoietic stem cells from placental/umbilical cord blood after culture. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 38, 1775–1789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Prat-Vidal C., et al. 2007. Umbilical cord blood-derived stem cells spontaneously express cardiomyogenic traits. Transplant. Proc. 39, 2434–2437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Prusa A. R., Hengstschlager M. 2002. Amniotic fluid cells and human stem cell research: a new connection. Med. Sci. Monit. 8, RA253–RA257. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Prusa A. R., Marton E., Rosner M., Bernaschek G., Hengstschlager M. 2003. Oct-4-expressing cells in human amniotic fluid: a new source for stem cell research? Hum. Reprod. 18, 1489–1493. ( 10.1093/humrep/deg279) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Rachakatla R. S., Marini F., Weiss M. L., Tamura M., Troyer D. 2007. Development of human umbilical cord matrix stem cell-based gene therapy for experimental lung tumors. Cancer Gene Ther. 14, 828–835. ( 10.1038/sj.cgt.7701077) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Rebel V., Miller C., Eaves C., Lansdorp P. 1996. The repopulation potential of fetal liver hematopoietic stem cells in mice exceeds that of their liver adult bone marrow counterparts. Blood 87, 3500–3507. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Rehni A. K., Singh N., Jaggi A. S., Singh M. 2007. Amniotic fluid derived stem cells ameliorate focal cerebral ischaemia-reperfusion injury induced behavioural deficits in mice. Behav. Brain Res. 183, 95–100. ( 10.1016/j.bbr.2007.05.028) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Riekstina U., Cakstina I., Parfejevs V., Hoogduijn M., Jankovskis G., Muiznieks I., Muceniece R., Ancans J. 2009. Embryonic stem cell marker expression pattern in human mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow, adipose tissue, heart and dermis. Stem Cell Rev. 5, 378–386. ( 10.1007/s12015-009-9094-9) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Rollini P., Kaiser S., Faes-van't Hull E., Kapp U., Leyvraz S. 2004. Long-term expansion of transplantable human fetal liver hematopoietic stem cells. Blood 103, 1166–1170. ( 10.1182/blood-2003-06-1815) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Roubelakis M. G., Pappa K. I., Bitsika V., Zagoura D., Vlahou A., Papadaki H. A., Antsaklis A., Anagnou N. P. 2007. Molecular and proteomic characterization of human mesenchymal stem cells derived from amniotic fluid: comparison to bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells Dev. 16, 931–952. ( 10.1089/scd.2007.0036) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  160. Sakuragawa N., et al. 1997. Evidence for active acetylcholine metabolism in human amniotic epithelial cells: applicable to intracerebral allografting for neurologic disease. Neurosci. Lett. 232, 53–56. ( 10.1016/S0304-3940(97)00570-3) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  161. Sakuragawa N., Enosawa S., Ishii T., Thangavel R., Tashiro T., Okuyama T., Suzuki S. 2000. Human amniotic epithelial cells are promising transgene carriers for allogeneic cell transplantation into liver. J. Hum. Genet. 45, 171–176. ( 10.1007/s100380050205) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  162. Sakuragawa N., Elwan M. A., Uchida S., Fujii T., Kawashima K. 2001. Non-neuronal neurotransmitters and neurotrophic factors in amniotic epithelial cells: expression and function in humans and monkey. Jpn J. Pharmacol. 85, 20–23. ( 10.1254/jjp.85.20) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  163. Schmidt D., et al. 2006. Living autologous heart valves engineered from human prenatally harvested progenitors. Circulation 114, I125–I131. ( 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.001040) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  164. Schoemans H., Theunissen K., Maertens J., Boogaerts M., Verfaillie C., Wagner J. 2006. Adult umbilical cord blood transplantation: a comprehensive review. Bone Marrow Transplant. 38, 83–93. ( 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705403) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  165. Secco M., et al. 2008. Multipotent stem cells from umbilical cord: cord is richer than blood! Stem Cells 26, 146–150. ( 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0381) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  166. Sessarego N., et al. 2008. Multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells from amniotic fluid: solid perspectives for clinical application. Haematologica 93, 339–346. ( 10.3324/haematol.11869) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  167. Siegel N., Rosner M., Hanneder M., Valli A., Hengstschlager M. 2007. Stem cells in amniotic fluid as new tools to study human genetic diseases. Stem Cell Rev. 3, 256–264. ( 10.1007/s12015-007-9003-z) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  168. Soncini M., Vertua E., Gibelli L., Zorzi F., Denegri M., Albertini A., Wengler G. S., Parolini O. 2007. Isolation and characterization of mesenchymal cells from human fetal membranes. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 1, 296–305. ( 10.1002/term.40) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  169. Spitalieri P., et al. 2009. Identification of multipotent cytotrophoblast cells from human first trimester chorionic villi. Cloning Stem Cells 11, 535–556. ( 10.1089/clo.2009.0046) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  170. Streubel B., Martucci-Ivessa G., Fleck T., Bittner R. E. 1996. In vitro transformation of amniotic cells to muscle cells–background and outlook. Wien. Med. Wochenschr. 146, 216–217. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  171. Studeny M., Marini F. C., Dembinski J. L., Zompetta C., Cabreira-Hansen M., Bekele B. N., Champlin R. E., Andreeff M. 2004. Mesenchymal stem cells: potential precursors for tumor stroma and targeted-delivery vehicles for anticancer agents. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 96, 1593–1603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  172. Sudo K., Kanno M., Miharada K., Ogawa S., Hiroyama T., Saijo K., Nakamura Y. 2007. Mesenchymal progenitors able to differentiate into osteogenic, chondrogenic, and/or adipogenic cells in vitro are present in most primary fibroblast-like cell populations. Stem Cells 25, 1610–1617. ( 10.1634/stemcells.2006-0504) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  173. Sun N., et al. 2009. Feeder-free derivation of induced pluripotent stem cells from adult human adipose stem cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 15 720–15 725. ( 10.1073/pnas.0908450106) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  174. Takahashi K., Yamanaka S. 2006. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126, 663–676. ( 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  175. Takahashi K., Tanabe K., Ohnuki M., Narita M., Ichisaka T., Tomoda K., Yamanaka S. 2007. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 131, 861–872. ( 10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.019) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  176. Tamagawa T., Ishiwata I., Saito S. 2004. Establishment and characterization of a pluripotent stem cell line derived from human amniotic membranes and initiation of germ layers in vitro. Hum. Cell. 17, 125–130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  177. Tamagawa T., Oi S., Ishiwata I., Ishikawa H., Nakamura Y. 2007. Differentiation of mesenchymal cells derived from human amniotic membranes into hepatocyte-like cells in vitro. Hum. Cell. 20, 77–84. ( 10.1111/j.1749-0774.2007.00032.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  178. Taylor P. A., McElmurry R. T., Lees C. J., Harrison D. E., Blazar B. R. 2002. Allogenic fetal liver cells have a distinct competitive engraftment advantage over adult bone marrow cells when infused into fetal as compared with adult severe combined immunodeficient recipients. Blood 99, 1870–1872. ( 10.1182/blood.V99.5.1870) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  179. Thomson J. A., Itskovitz-Eldor J., Shapiro S. S., Waknitz M. A., Swiergiel J. J., Marshall V. S., Jones J. M. 1998. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 282, 1145–1147. ( 10.1126/science.282.5391.1145) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  180. Torricelli F., Brizzi L., Bernabei P. A., Gheri G., Di Lollo S., Nutini L., Lisi E., Di Tommaso M., Cariati E. 1993. Identification of hematopoietic progenitor cells in human amniotic fluid before the 12th week of gestation. Ital. J. Anat. Embryol. 98, 119–126. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  181. Troyer D. L., Weiss M. L. 2008. Wharton's jelly-derived cells are a primitive stromal cell population. Stem Cells 26, 591–599. ( 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0439) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  182. Tsai M. S., Lee J. L., Chang Y. J., Hwang S. M. 2004. Isolation of human multipotent mesenchymal stem cells from second-trimester amniotic fluid using a novel two-stage culture protocol. Hum. Reprod. 19, 1450–1456. ( 10.1093/humrep/deh279) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  183. Tsai M.-S., Hwang S.-M., Tsai Y.-L., Cheng F.-C., Lee J.-L., Chang J. 2006. Clonal amniotic fluid-derived stem cells express characteristics of both mesenchymal and neural stem cells. Biol. Reprod. 74, 545–551. ( 10.1095/biolreprod.105.046029) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  184. Tsai M., et al. 2007. Functional network analysis of the transcriptomes of mesenchymal stem cells derived from amniotic fluid, amniotic membrane, cord blood, and bone marrow. Stem Cells 25, 2511–2523. ( 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0023) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  185. Uchida S., Inanaga Y., Kobayashi M., Hurukawa S., Araie M., Sakuragawa N. 2000. Neurotrophic function of conditioned medium from human amniotic epithelial cells. J. Neurosci. Res. 62, 585–590. () [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  186. Valli A., et al. 2010. Embryoid body formation of human amniotic fluid stem cells depends on mTOR. Oncogene 29, 966–977. ( 10.1038/onc.2009.405) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  187. Vaziri H., et al. 2010. Spontaneous reversal of the developmental aging of normal human cells following transcriptional reprogramming. Regen. Med. 5, 345–363. ( 10.2217/rme.10.21) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  188. Ventura C., et al. 2007. Hyaluronan mixed esters of butyric and retinoic acid drive cardiac and endothelial fate in term placenta human mesenchymal stem cells and enhance cardiac repair in infarcted rat hearts. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 14 243–14 252. ( 10.1074/jbc.M609350200) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  189. Wagers A. J., Christensen J. L., Weissman I. L. 2002. Cell fate determination from stem cells. Gene Ther. 9, 606–612. ( 10.1038/sj.gt.3301717) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  190. Wang H.-S., Hung S.-C., Peng S.-T., Huang C.-C., Wei H.-M., Guo Y.-J., Fu Y.-S., Lai M.-C., Chen C. 2004. Mesenchymal stem cells in the Wharton's jelly of the human umbilical cord. Stem Cells 22, 1330–1337. ( 10.1634/stemcells.2004-0013) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  191. Wang J., et al. 2003. SCID-repopulating cell activity of human cord blood-derived CD34- cells assured by intra-bone marrow injection. Blood 101, 2924–2931. ( 10.1182/blood-2002-09-2782) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  192. Wang J., Wang L., Wu Y., Xiang Y., Xie C., Jia B., Harrington J., McNiece I. 2004. Mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells in human umbilical cord blood as support for ex vivo expansion of CD34(+) hematopoietic stem cells and for chondrogenic differentiation. Haematologica 89, 837–844. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  193. Weiss M. L., Troyer D. L. 2006. Stem cells in the umbilical cord. Stem Cell Rev. 2, 155–162. ( 10.1007/s12015-006-0022-y) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  194. Weiss M. L., et al. 2006. Human umbilical cord matrix stem cells: preliminary characterization and effect of transplantation in a rodent model of Parkinson's disease. Stem Cells 24, 781–792. ( 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0330) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  195. Weissman I., Shizuru J. 2008. The origins of the identification and isolation of hematopoietic stem cells, and their capability to induce donor-specific transplantation tolerance and treat autoimmune diseases. Blood 112, 3543–3553. ( 10.1182/blood-2008-08-078220) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  196. Weissman I., Anderson D., Gage F. 2001. Stem and progenitor cells: origins, phenotypes, lineage commitments, and transdifferentiations. Annu. Rev. Cell. Dev. Biol. 17, 387–403. ( 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.17.1.387) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  197. Yao Z., Qin M., Liu J., Chen X., Zhou D. 2004. In vitro cultivation of human fetal pancreatic ductal stem cells and their differentiation into insulin-producing cells. World J. Gastroenterol. 10, 1452–1456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  198. Yeh Y. C., et al. 2010. Cellular cardiomyoplasty with human amniotic fluid stem cells: in vitro in vivo studies. Tissue Eng. Part A 16, 1925–1936. ( 10.1089/ten.tea.2009.0728) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  199. Yen B. L., et al. 2005. Isolation of multipotent cells from human term placenta. Stem Cells 23, 3–9. ( 10.1634/stemcells.2004-0098) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  200. Yen B. L., Chien C.-C., Chen Y.-C., Chen J.-T., Huang J.-S., Lee F.-K., Huang I. 2008. Placenta-derived multipotent cells differentiate into neuronal and glial cells in vitro. Tissue Eng. Part A 14, 9–17. ( 10.1089/ten.a.2006.0352) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  201. Yu L. C., Wall D. A., Sandler E., Chan K. W., Grayson G., Kletzel M. 2001. Unrelated cord blood transplant experience by the pediatric blood and marrow transplant consortium. Pediatr. Hematol. Oncol. 18, 235–245. ( 10.1080/088800101750238531) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  202. Yu J., et al. 2007. Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science 318, 1917–1920. ( 10.1126/science.1151526) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  203. Zhang Y., Li C. D., Jiang X. X., Li H. L., Tang P. H., Mao N. 2004. Comparison of mesenchymal stem cells from human placenta and bone marrow. Chin. Med. J. (Engl) 117, 882–887. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  204. Zhang Z. Y., Teoh S. H., Chong M. S., Schantz J. T., Fisk N. M., Choolani M. A., Chan J. 2009. Superior osteogenic capacity for bone tissue engineering of fetal compared with perinatal and adult mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells 27, 126–137. ( 10.1634/stemcells.2008-0456) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  205. Zhao P., Ise H., Hongo M., Ota M., Konishi I., Nikaido T. 2005. Human amniotic mesenchymal cells have some characteristics of cardiomyocytes. Transplantation 79, 528–535. ( 10.1097/01.TP.0000149503.92433.39) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  206. Zhao Y., Wang H., Mazzone T. 2006. Identification of stem cells from human umbilical cord blood with embryonic and hematopoietic characteristics. Exp. Cell Res. 312, 2454–2464. ( 10.1016/j.yexcr.2006.04.008) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  207. Zuba-Surma E. K., Klich I., Greco N., Laughlin M. J., Ratajczak J., Ratajczak M. Z. 2010. Optimization of isolation and further characterization of umbilical-cord-blood-derived very small embryonic/ epiblast-like stem cells (VSELs). Eur. J. Haematol. 84, 34–46. ( 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2009.01352.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Royal Society Interface are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES