The Ca²⁺-dependent protein kinase CPK3 is required for MAPK-independent salt-stress acclimation in Arabidopsis

Abstract

Plants use different signalling pathways to respond to external stimuli. Intracellular signalling via calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs) or mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) present two major pathways that are widely used to react to a changing environment. Both CDPK and MAPK pathways are known to be involved in the signalling of abiotic and biotic stresses in animal, yeast and plant cells. Here, we show the essential function of the CDPK CPK3 (At4g23650) for salt stress acclimation in Arabidopsis thaliana, and test crosstalk between CPK3 and the major salt-stress activated MAPKs MPK4 and MPK6 in the salt stress response. CPK3 kinase activity was induced by salt and other stresses after transient overexpression in Arabidopsis protoplasts, but endogenous CPK3 appeared to be constitutively active in roots and leaves in a strictly Ca²⁺-dependent manner. cpk3 mutants show a salt-sensitive phenotype comparable with mutants in MAPK pathways. In contrast to animal cells, where crosstalk between Ca²⁺ and MAPK signalling is well established, CPK3 seems to act independently of those pathways. Salt-induced transcriptional induction of known salt stress-regulated and MAPK-dependent marker genes was not altered, whereas post-translational protein phosphorylation patterns from roots of wild type and cpk3 plants revealed clear differences. A significant portion of CPK3 was found to be associated with the plasma membrane and the vacuole, both depending on its N-terminal myristoylation. An initial proteomic study led to the identification of 28 potential CPK3 targets, predominantly membrane-associated proteins.

Introduction

Plants as sessile organisms must respond to changes in environmental conditions, such as different forms of stress or different light intensities. Many extracellular signals elicit changes in the cellular Ca²⁺ concentrations in plants (Cheng et al., 2002; Sanders et al., 2002; Ludwig et al., 2004). The decoding of these calcium signals is performed by protein kinases, such as the calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs), that mediate cellular responses either directly by changing enzymatic activities via protein phosphorylation or indirectly by changing gene expression patterns (Sathyanarayanan and Poovaiah, 2004). Additional signal transduction pathways use evolutionary highly conserved mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascades to transmit extracellular signals towards altered gene expression patterns, resulting in cellular adaptation (Hamel et al., 2006; Colcombet and Hirt, 2008). Whereas crosstalk between Ca²⁺-dependent signalling and MAPK pathways has been elaborately studied in animal systems (Agell et al., 2002; Rozengurt, 2007), it has hardly been addressed in plant signal transduction.

Generally, these signalling pathways mediate changes in gene expression by modifiying the transcriptional machinery (Xiong et al., 2002), ultimately leading to altered gene expression patterns. Accordingly, transcription factors have long been suspected to be important targets of those pathways. In addition, more and more evidence for direct modulation of enzymatic activities by protein phosphorylation has been reported in recent years. Stress-induced ethylene production is an example where different signalling pathways trigger ethylene synthesis by the activation of ACC synthase, the key enzyme for ethylene synthesis, at both levels: by transcriptional upregulation (Kim et al., 2003; Teige et al., 2004) or by direct protein phosphorylation (Liu and Zhang, 2004), thereby regulating protein stability and accumulation (Joo et al., 2008). A putative CDPK phosphorylation site was also identified in ACC synthase (Hernandez Sebastia et al., 2004), and ethylene was furthermore reported to mediate crosstalk between calcium dependent and MAPK signalling pathways (Ludwig et al., 2005). Evidence for other targets of CDPKs, including different metabolic enzymes such as nitrate reductase (NR), sucrose synthase (SuSy) or sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS), has been summarized by Cheng et al. (2002), Harper et al. (2004) and Harper and Harmon (2005).

Salt stress constrains plant growth based on two effects: by causing osmotic stress, and by disturbing cellular ion homeostasis. Thus, the ability to maintain an optimal K⁺/Na⁺ ratio in the cytosol is one of the key features of plant salt tolerance (Tuteja, 2007; Munns and Tester, 2008; Leidi et al., 2010). Accordingly, the regulation of numerous K⁺ uptake as well as K⁺ and Na⁺ transport systems is of major importance for adaptation to salt stress, and has been intensively studied in order to understand and improve salt tolerance in plants (Yamaguchi and Blumwald, 2005; Horie et al., 2009). Plants apply a plethora of different systems to either exclude Na⁺ from the cell or to sequester it into the vacuole via Na⁺/H⁺ antiporters (Tuteja, 2007). Accordingly, the overexpression of the vacuolar Na⁺/H⁺ antiporter NHX1 (Apse et al., 1999), or the plasma membrane Na⁺/H⁺ antiporter SOS1 (Shi et al., 2003), conferred a remarkable salt tolerance to plants.

Elevated cytosolic Ca²⁺ levels are among the first cellular responses to extracellular salt stress (Knight et al., 1997), and have been identified as a central regulator in numerous different stress signal transduction pathways (Xiong et al., 2002; Zhu, 2002): for example, in the salt overly sensitive (SOS) pathway (Mahajan et al., 2008). SOS3, a Ca²⁺ sensor, transduces the signal downstream by activating the protein kinase SOS2, which regulates the plasma membrane Na⁺/H⁺ antiporter SOS1, thus maintaining cellular ion homeostasis under salt stress conditions. The important role of Ca²⁺ signalling during the salt stress response is furthermore reflected by the findings that SOS2 also interacts with NHX1 (Qiu et al., 2004), the vacuolar H⁺-ATPase (Batelli et al., 2007) and the vacuolar H⁺/Ca²⁺ antiporter CAX1 (Cheng et al., 2004), thus regulating cellular ion homeostasis in many different ways.

A recent analysis of cpk3 cpk6 double knock-out plants has shown altered responses of vacuolar potassium channels in leaf guard cells in response to abscisic acid (ABA), suggesting that these two kinases regulate the activity of potassium channels by phosphorylation (Mori et al., 2006). Interestingly, an increasing body of data on the potential regulation of membrane proteins by phosphorylation, including potential CDPK target motifs, appears in the current literature, pointing towards a much more complex network of Ca²⁺ signalling (Morel et al., 2006; Marmagne et al., 2007; Chang et al., 2009).

In this work, we have analysed CPK3-mediated Ca²⁺-dependent signalling in the salt stress response in Arabidopsis thaliana. CPK3 had not previously been functionally characterized in detail, and accordingly its role in the salt stress response was absolutely unknown. The salt-sensitive phenotype of cpk3 mutants could not be explained by the transcriptional induction of known salt-responsive genes, indicating that CPK3 acts primarily at the post-translational level and mediates the immediate stress response via the regulation of membrane-localized target proteins, whereas the MKK2–MPK4/6 pathway seems to be responsible for the transcriptional acclimation to salt stress. This model is supported by the identification of 28 potential CPK3 targets in an initial proteomic approach, which are predominantly membrane associated.

Results

CPK3 kinase activity is stress-induced in protoplasts but constitutive in planta

In order to attribute a biological function to CPK3, we analysed which conditions trigger its kinase activity. We first expressed haemagglutinin (HA) epitope-tagged CPK3 transiently in Arabidopsis protoplasts, and measured its kinase activity towards histone III-S as the substrate in immunocomplex kinase assays 15 min after the application of different stimuli. CPK3 kinase activity was found to be induced by almost all treatments performed, but clearly the strongest activation was detected after salt-stress treatment (Figure 1a). To verify these data in planta, we tested the salt-triggered activation of CPK3 in the roots and leaves of 6-week-old hydroponically grown plants and seedlings in immunocomplex kinase assays using a CPK3-specific antibody. This peptide antibody is directed against the C-terminal 15 amino acids of CPK3 and is highly specific, as indicated by the complete lack of detectable kinase activity in cpk3 knock-out plants (cpk3-2; see Figure S1 for a detailed characterization of used lines). CPK3 kinase activity was completely abolished by the addition of 200 μm EGTA, but in contrast to the transiently overexpressed kinase in protoplasts, endogenous CPK3 appeared to be constitutively active in roots (Figure 1b), leaves and seedlings (Figure S2a,b) in planta. However, this apparent contradiction might be caused by technical limitations (see Discussion). In order to test whether CPK3 is transcriptionally regulated in response to salt stress, we performed semi-quantitative RT-PCR using CPK3-specific primers and actin (ACT3; see Table S1 for primers) as the control (Figure 1c). Again, no significant difference in the expression level of CPK3 could be detected in response to salt stress after 30 and 60 min, which is in line with CPK3 expression data from microarrays (Kreps et al., 2002).

Figure 1.

CPK3 kinase activities and salt-sensitive phenotype of cpk3 mutants.(a) Activation of transiently expressed HA-epitope tagged CPK3 in response to different stresses in Arabidopsis protoplasts. Immunocomplex kinase assays were performed as described in Experimental procedures. The top panel shows the incorporation of ³²P into the generic substrate Histone IIIS, and the bottom panel displays CPK3 protein levels: 0, mock treatment; cold, 4°C; NaCl, 150 mm; heat, 37°C; H₂O₂, 1 mm; flagellin, 15 nm; laminarin, 1 mm.(b) Endogenous CPK3 kinase activity in response to salt stress in roots of cpk3-2 knock-out and Col-0 plants measured in immunocomplex kinase assays. Plants were treated with 150 mm NaCl for 0, 10 and 30 min. Immunocomplex kinase assays were performed in the absence or presence 200 μm EGTA.(c) CPK3 transcript levels in response to salt stress.(d) CPK3 protein levels in Col-0 and three independent T-DNA insertion lines.(e) Germination rates of Col-0 and the T-DNA insertion lines on quarter-strength Hoagland + 150 mm NaCl. Error bars indicate SEM (n = 10). Statistically significant differences from Col-0 calculated by a two-tailed Student’s t-tests: *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.001.

cpk3 plants display a salt-sensitive phenotype

To address whether CPK3 does play an essential role in the salt stress response of plants, we analysed different CPK3 knock-out and overexpressor lines for a phenotype under salt stress conditions. Three different T-DNA insertion lines for CPK3 were obtained from the Salk collection (http://signal.salk.edu) (Alonso et al., 2003). The position of their insertions was determined by PCR, and CPK3 expression was measured at the mRNA and protein levels (Figures 1d and S1). The cpk3-2 line was verified as a completely null mutant at the mRNA and protein level; the cpk3-1 line showed remaining transcript, but almost no protein in the western blot. In contrast, the cpk3-3 line, with insertion in the promoter region, had much higher protein levels compared with the corresponding wild type (Col-0) (Figure 1d). These lines were used to compare the germination rates of cpk3 mutants and overexpressor lines with the corresponding wild type on agar plates containing 150 mm NaCl (Figure 1e). Without salt stress the germination rate of all lines was 100%, whereas on plates containing 150 mm NaCl a clear difference appeared. Germination of both cpk3 mutant lines (cpk3-2 and cpk3-1) was severely impaired compared with the wild type, whereas the germination rate of the CPK3 overexpressing line (cpk3-3) was clearly increased. Moreover, the increase in the germination rate on salt corresponded with the level of CPK3 expression, as revealed by the analysis of different 35S::CPK3-YFP lines (Figure S3). In the CPK3-1 line, representing a weak overexpressor according to the RT-PCR data, the salt tolerance was only slightly improved compared with the wild type, but the strong overexpressor line CPK3-2 showed an improved germination rate under salt stress conditions. These differences proved to be statistically significant in both cases after analysis of data obtained from more than 100 seedlings per plate in 10 independent repetitions for each line tested. In summary, an essential role of CPK3 for adaptation to salt stress can be clearly concluded from these experiments.

CPK3 is N-myristoylated, and localized to the nucleus and cellular membranes

Next, we addressed the question of tissue-specific and subcellular localization of CPK3. We compared endogenous CPK3 protein accumulation in different plant tissues and subcellular fractions of wild-type plants using the CPK3-specific antibody described above (Figure 2a). The antibody correctly recognized the recombinant protein, and no background was visible in the cpk3-2 knock-out line. CPK3 protein could be detected in all tissues, which corresponds to transcript levels of published microarray data (Zimmermann et al., 2004).

Figure 2.

Localization and N-myristoylation of CPK3.(a) Tissue-specific expression of CPK3 in plants: root, stem, flower, young (20 days post germination) and old (40 days post germination) leaves.(b) Endogenous CPK3 in subcellular fractionation from wild-type plants. Lanes from left to right: total cell extract, protein from the 10 000 g (10 k) supernatant (S) and pellet (P), as well as the 100 000 g (100 k) supernatant (S) and pellet (P).(c) In vitro myristoylation of CPK3 and CPK2 as a positive control. Wild-type (WT) and non-myristoylable G₂A mutants of CPK2 and CPK3 were in vitro translated in the presence of either ³H-labelled myristic acid or ³⁵S-labelled methionine, and incorporation of the label was scored by autoradiography.(d) Fractionation of YFP-tagged CPK3 (WT) and G₂A mutants (G2A) from infiltrated tobacco leaves using a GFP antibody. S, supernatant; P, pellet; 10 k, centrifugation for 10 min at 10 000 g; 100 k, centrifugation for 1 h at 100 000 g.

The further elucidation of the subcellular localization of CPK3 was particularly important because a chloroplast localization of CPK3 is predicted in several databases (i.e. MIPS or TAIR), and would be consistent with older published data on CPK3 (Hong et al., 1996). In a more recent paper, a cytoplasmic and nuclear localization of CPK3 was shown in roots (Dammann et al., 2003), but no data from leaves were shown in that work. We addressed CPK3 localization by two different approaches.

Subcellular fractionation experiments, detecting endogenous CPK3 by western blotting (Figure 2b), revealed that most of the protein had already accumulated in the first pellet obtained after 10 min of centrifugation at 10 000 g. After centrifugation of the supernatant from the first separation for 1 h at 100 000 g, almost no CPK3 remained detectable in the supernatant, emphasising its strong membrane association. The first pellet contained nuclei and chloroplasts, thus a more detailed analysis was required to determine the subcellular localization of CPK3. To this end, we studied the localization of CPK3-YFP fusion proteins in transiently transformed leaf epidermal cells, and found CPK3-YFP protein predominantly localized at cellular membranes and in the nucleus (Figure S4a), whereas free YFP was visible exclusively in the nucleus and in the cytosol, but not at membranes (Figure S4c). In some cases CPK3 seemed to co-localize with chloroplasts, but in vitro chloroplast import assays clearly showed that CPK3 could not be imported into chloroplasts (Figure S4d,e). These results were consistent with the subcellular fractionation of the endogenous protein, implying that the observed localization is not a result of overexpression artifacts.

As CPK3 harbours a potential myristoylation site in its N terminus, MGHRHSKSKS (Towler et al., 1988; Qi et al., 2000), we set out to test the possibility of N-myristoylation, and the functional consequences of this modification for localization. We performed an in vitro translation of CPK3 in wheatgerm extracts, and monitored the incorporation of either ³⁵S-labelled methionine, or ³H-labelled myristic acid by autoradiography after SDS-PAGE (Figure 2c) to test whether CPK3 could be N-myristoylated, despite its negative prediction for this modification (Cheng et al., 2002; Hrabak et al., 2003). This approach had successfully been used before for CPK2 (Lu and Hrabak, 2002), and also revealed the N-myristoylation of CPK3 here. As negative controls, we used the non-myristoylable G₂A mutant. As additional backup to prove the functional effect of N-myristoylation on the localization of CPK3, we performed biochemical fractionation experiments. Tobacco leaves were infiltrated with the wild-type and the G₂A version of CPK3-YFP, and membrane association was detected by western blots using a GFP antibody (Figure 2d). No signal was detectable in the wild-type pellet of the 100 000 g supernatant, but a strong signal remained in the 100 000 g supernatant of the G₂A mutant (indicated by the arrows in Figure 2d), clearly demonstrating that N-myristoylation is required for the membrane association of CPK3. To visualize the potential effects in planta, we transformed a construct in which the myristoylated amino acid glycine 2 had been substituted by an alanine (G₂A), thus aborting the N-myristoylation of CPK3. As expected, the G₂A mutant was no longer membrane associated, and displayed a strong accumulation in the nucleus and the cytosolic lobes of the epidermal cells (triangle in Figure S4b).

N-myristoylation of CPK3 is required for its association with the vacuolar and plasma membrane

In order to identify the specific membrane system to which CPK3 is localized in vivo, we co-expressed CPK3-YFP fusion proteins together with markers for the vacuolar membrane (TPK1; Latz et al., 2007) and the plasma membrane (CPK9; Nelson et al., 2006; Benetka et al., 2008) as mCherry fusion proteins. We could clearly observe the co-localization of CPK3_WT-YFP with the vacuolar two-pore potassium channel (TPK1) at the vacuolar membrane (Figure 3a–c). In contrast, the non-myristoylatable CPK3_G2A-YFP accumulated in cytoplasmic lobes (triangles in Figure 3d), whereas TPK1-mCherry was restricted to the tonoplast (triangle in Figure 3e). If visible, the position of the nucleus was deduced from the bright-field images (Figure S5). The effect of the N-myristoylation of CPK3 is clearly visible by comparing the merged images of the wild-type protein with TPK1 (Figure 3c) and the G₂A mutant (Figure 3f). Similarly, we could observe the co-localization of CPK3_WT-YFP and the plasma membrane localized CPK9-mCherry (Figure 3g–i). Here, CPK3 was also visible in cytoplasmic regions, for example in the areas surrounding the chloroplasts (triangles in Figure 3g), whereas CPK9 was restricted to the plasma membrane (Figure 3h). Again, the non-myristoylatable CPK3_G2A-YFP appeared in cytoplasmic lobes (triangles in Figure 3j), whereas co-expressed CPK9-mCherry labelled the plasma membrane (Figure 3k), and the visible co-localization is reduced (Figure 3l) compared with the wild-type CPK3 (Figure 3i). In order to backup these results with an independent biochemical approach, we isolated plasma membranes from a microsomal membrane fraction by two-phase partitioning from Arabidopsis leaves to detect endogenous CPK3. This method has also been used for CPK2 (Lu and Hrabak, 2002), and enriches the plasma membrane (PM) in the upper phase and other cellular membranes in the lower phase. Both phases were analysed by western blotting to detect CPK3 and markers for the plasma membrane (H⁺-ATPase), vacuolar membrane (V-ATPase), mitochondrial membranes (Porin) and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (Sar1) (Figure 3m). Consistent with the previous results obtained by microscopy, CPK3 did partition with the PM in the upper phase (U), and could also be detected in the lower phase (L), together with the other membrane fractions.

Figure 3.

Co-localization of wild-type and non-myristoylated CPK3 with the vacuolar and the plasma membrane in tobacco leaf epidermal cells. The green channel shows the CPK3-YFP signal, the red channel displays chlorophyll autofluorescence and the magenta channel displays the mCherry fusion proteins. Co-localization can be deduced from a white signal in the merged images.(a–c) Co-localization of CPK3_WT-YFP and TPK1-mCherry at vacuolar membranes. The nucleus (N) is marked by an arrow.(d–f) Co-expression of CPK3_G2A-YFP and TPK1-mCherry.(g–i) Co-localization of CPK3_WT-YFP and CPK9-mCherry at the plasma membrane.(j–l) Co-expression of CPK3_G2A-YFP and CPK9-mCherry. Scale bars: 10 μm.(m) Co-partitioning of endogenous CPK3 with different membranes from Arabidopsis leaves in phase-partitioning experiments. The upper phase (U) contains purified plasma membrane; the lower phase (L) contains plasma, mitochondrial, vacuolar and endoplasmic reticulum membranes. Different membranes were detected via western blotting using the indicated markers.

Transcriptional induction of salt stress-induced and MAPK-dependent marker genes is not affected by CPK3

The observed nuclear localization of CPK3 suggests a role in the transcriptional regulation of the stress response. This is known for MAPK pathways, which predominantly target transcriptional responses in animals (Whitmarsh, 2007) and plants, considering the gene expression studies (Qiu et al., 2008b) and identified MAPK targets involved in transcriptional regulation (Qiu et al., 2008a). To look further downstream into this pathway, we analysed transcriptional regulation of salt stress-induced and MAPK-dependent marker genes in cpk3 knock-out and overexpressor lines. A total of 22 target genes known to be regulated in the salt stress response, based on published microarray data (Kreps et al., 2002; Seki et al., 2002; Taji et al., 2004), were studied by semi-quantitative RT-PCR before, and 30 and 60 min after, salt stress treatment in wild-type plants (Col-0), the cpk3 mutant (cpk3-2), and the two CPK3 overexpressor lines CPK3-1 and CPK3-2. Figure 4a shows the results for eight genes involved in ethylene signalling and biosynthesis (ERF6 and ACS6), synthesis of the compatible solutes galactinol (GolS2) and proline (P5CS), transcriptional regulation (STZ), and general stress response (ERD10, RD20 and RD29a). It turned out that all of the selected genes were normally induced in all lines. Furthermore, the complete set of genes that we analysed in these studies included the Na⁺/H⁺ antiporters NHX1 and SOS1, the Na⁺-induced K⁺ channel KC1, several genes involved in trehalose synthesis (TPS1, TPS11 and T6PP) and proline catabolism (PDH), the ABA- and salt stress-responsive protein phosphatases AHG3 and PP2C, and the general stress-response factors ERD15 and RD29b. But also those typical salt stress marker genes were normally induced.

Figure 4.

Crosstalk between MAPK and CPK3 kinase activities, and induction of marker genes, upon salt stress.(a) Salt-triggered induction of known salt stress-responsive marker genes was compared among the wild type (Col-0), cpk3-2, and the two CPK3 overexpressor lines by RT-PCR, and compared with Actin (ACT3) as an internal control. Gene identifiers and sequences of the used primers are listed in Table S1. Fourteen-day-old seedlings were treated with 150 mm NaCl for the indicated time periods, as described in the Experimental procedures.(b) Salt-triggered activation of MPK6 in wild type (Col-0), cpk3-2 knock-out, and two independent CPK3 overexpressor lines towards myeline basic protein (MBP) as generic substrate. Kinase activities were measured in immunocomplex kinase assays upon salt treatment of 14-day-old seedlings for 15 min, as described in the Experimental procedures.

It is known that the MAPKs MPK4 and MPK6 are involved in the salt stress response in Arabidopsis (Ichimura et al., 2000; Teige et al., 2004), and that those two MAPKs are regulated by the upstream MAPK kinase MKK2 (Teige et al., 2004). Moreover, mkk2 mutants show a phenotype similar to cpk3 on salt media, and the MKK2 pathway regulates a set of 127 target genes, including typical salt stress markers (Teige et al., 2004). Therefore, we also tested the activation of MPK4 and MPK6 in cpk3 knock-out and CPK3 overexpressor lines in response to salt stress. However, no difference in MAPK activation could be detected for both, MPK6 (Figure 4b) and MPK4 (Figure S6a) in immunocomplex kinase assays. Vice versa, CPK3 kinase activity was also not affected in MKK2 knock-out or overexpressor lines (Figure S6b), arguing against a direct crosstalk of CPK3 and salt stress-induced MAPKs.

cpk3 plants exhibit differences in protein phosphorylation under basal conditions and in response to salt stress

The previous data, indicating that CPK3 activity has no influence on salt stress-dependent gene expression, gave rise to the question of how the salt-sensitive phenotype of the cpk3 mutants could be explained. Therefore we searched for changes in protein phosphorylation patterns in wild-type and cpk3 mutants in an unbiased proteomic approach. We analyzed phosphorylated threonine residues using a phosphoamino acid-specific antibody after 2D gel separation and western blotting of total proteins from salt-stressed and untreated plant extracts. Unfortunately, antibodies directed against phosphorylated serine residues proved not to be useful in these studies. Considering the important role of roots for salt stress adaptation, and the strong expression of CPK3 in this tissue (Figure 2a), we focused our studies on root cells isolated from a hydroponic culture of 6-week-old plants, and compared phosphorylation patterns of proteins in wild-type (Col-0) and cpk3 knock-out plants (cpk3-2) before and 30 min after the application of salt stress. All experiments were carried out three times with identical results. More than 300 protein spots could be detected reproducibly after 2D gel separation of 100 μg of total protein by Coomassie staining, after blotting on polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes. Some differences in threonine phosphorylation were already visible between the wild type and the cpk3 mutant without stress conditions (Figure 5a). This result is consistent with the observed constitutive activity of CPK3 in roots and leaves, as shown in Figures 1b and S2. In the corresponding Coomassie stains, no significant differences in total protein spots could be detected (Figure S7), indicating that the observed differences are the result of post-translational modifications, and not to major differences in protein expression. The reproducibly observed changes are indicated by the numbers in Figure 5a,b. In summary, five differences (either new spots or strongly enhanced intensities) were detectable without stress between the wild type and the cpk3 mutant (Figure 5a), and 15 differences appeared 30 min after the salt stress treatments (Figure 5b). In order to uncover CPK3 targets from this approach an identification of differentially phosphorylated proteins by mass spectrometry was performed. However, this approach was limited by two facts. First, only threonine phosphorylation could be detected, but serine phosphorylation is generally much more abundant. Second, the unambiguous identification of the protein spots corresponding to the signals from the western blot was extremely difficult in these complex samples. Therefore, we extended the proteomic approach towards the identification of potential CPK3 targets in microsomal fractions, considering the fact that CPK3 turned out to be membrane associated to a significant degree. Using radioactive [γ-³²P]ATP and recombinantly expressed CPK3 for the Ca²⁺-dependent phosphorylation of microsomal fractions, we observed distinct CPK3-specific and Ca²⁺-dependent signals, without a significant background, in three independent experiments (Figure S8a); therefore, we proceeded to perform these experiments using radioactive and cold ATP in parallel, and to identify differentially phosphorylated spots after 2D gel separation by mass spectrometry (Figure S8b). From the 15 spots analysed we were able to unambiguously identify 78 proteins with very high confidence level (Table S2). In order to filter this data set further for potential CDPK targets, we analysed the proteins for a significant over-representation of known CDPK phosphorylation sites. We developed an algorithm that searches for the presence of five known CDPK consensus sites, and calculates their over-representation in comparison with the entire Arabidopsis proteome, also including a weighting reflecting the stringency of the defined consensus site. We termed the resulting figure a P-score, and the top 28 proteins with a P-score ≥ 4 were selected as potential CPK3 targets (Table 1). As expected, 20 of them are known membrane or membrane-associated proteins, and notably 13 of them are listed as phosphorylated proteins in the Phosphat database (http://phosphat.mpimp-golm.mpg.de/db.html).

Figure 5.

Comparison of threonine phosphorylation patterns in the roots of 6-week-old Col-0 and cpk3-2, hydroponically grown in half-strength Hoagland. (a) or half-strength Hoagland supplemented with 150 mm NaCl for 30 min before protein isolation (b). Spot patterns were obtained by western blot analysis with an anti p-Thr antibody. Numbers in the figures indicate spots showing different intensities between Col-0 and cpk3-2 root material throughout three independent replications of the experiment.

Table 1.

Potential CPK3 targets identified via 2D gel phosphoproteomics. Documented membrane association is indicated in bold. The P-score is described in the Experimental procedures

AGI	Annotation	P-score	References
AT2G30870	ERD13, glutathione-S-transferase PHI 10	32	Ryu et al. (2009), Carter et al. (2004) and Marmagne et al. (2007)
AT2G45820*	Remorin, putative DNA-binding protein, salt-induced	22	Benschop et al. (2007), Nelson et al. (2006) and Kreps et al. (2002)
AT1G04690	KAB1, KV-BETA1 (potassium channel beta subunit)	18	Maathuis (2006)
AT3G18240*	Unknown protein, phosphorylated	18	de la Fuente van Bentem et al. (2008)
AT1G53070*	Legume lectin family protein, cell wall asscociated	15
AT1G09210*	CRT2, Calreticulin 2; calcium ion binding	13	Jiang et al. (2007)
AT1G56340*	CRT1, Calreticulin 1; calcium ion binding	12	Jiang et al. (2007)
AT5G38480*	GRF3, 14-3-3 PSI, overexpression confers salt tolerance	9	Marmagne et al. (2007) and Du et al. (2008)
AT3G02750*	PP2C, protein phosphatase 2C family, group E	9	Bassel et al. (2008)
AT5G19440	CAD, Cinnamyl-alcohol dehydrogenase, putative	9	Marmagne et al. (2007)
AT3G18820	RAB71, (Arabidopsis RAB GTPase homolog G3F); GTP binding	8	Marmagne et al. (2007)
AT2G02990	RNS1, (Ribonuclease 1); cell wall/plasma membrane associated	8
AT1G02090*	CSN7, MAP kinase kinase; subunit of COP9 signalosome	7
AT5G16050*	GRF5, 14-3-3 UPSILON (general regularory factor 5)	6	Marmagne et al. (2007)
AT2G43940	Thiol methyltransferase, putative, chloroplast envelope	6
AT5G07340	Calnexin, putative, vacuolar	6	Schmidt et al. (2007)
AT1G28200	FIP1 (FH interacting protein 1), VirF-interacting protein FIP1	5
AT1G78300	GRF2, 14-3-3 OMEGA, (general regularory factor 2)	5	Chang et al. (2009)
AT3G06300	P4H-2, (prolyl-4-hydroxylase, isoform 2); endomembrane system	5
AT1G77120*	ADH1, (alcohol dehdrogenase 1); salt stress-responsive	5	de la Fuente van Bentem et al. (2008) and Jiang et al. (2007)
AT5G67500	VDAC2 (voltage-dependent anion channel 2), seedling development	5	Yan et al. (2009) and Lee et al. (2009)
AT3G01280	VDAC1 (voltage-dependent anion channel 1)	5	Lee et al. (2009)
AT1G74020	SS2 (STRICTOSIDINE SYNTHASE 2); strictosidine synthase	5	Marmagne et al. (2007)
AT4G17720*	RNA recognition motif (RRM)-containing protein, phosphorylated	5	de la Fuente van Bentem et al. (2006)
AT4G18800	RABA1D (Arabidopsis RAB GTPase homolog A1D);	5	Marmagne et al. (2004)
AT3G61990	O-methyltransferase family 3 protein, cytosolic	4
AT1G22280*	PAPP2C, phytochrome-associated protein phosphatase 2C; group F	4	de la Fuente van Bentem et al. (2008) and Phee et al. (2008)
AT3G15260*	PP2C, protein phosphatase 2C family, group F	4

^*Phosphorylated peptides listed in the Phosphat 3.0 database (http://phosphat.mpimp-golm.mpg.de/db.html).

Discussion

We have provided a detailed functional analysis of the calcium-dependent protein kinase CPK3, covering protein function and subcellular localization, as well as analysis of knock-out and overexpressor plants, and the identification of potential targets. We found that CPK3 kinase activity is triggered by salt and other stresses after transient overexpression in the protoplast system, but that the endogenous kinase appeared to be constitutively active in roots and leaves in planta. This apparent discrepancy might be caused simply by the strong difference in the expression level, which could affect low basal Ca²⁺ signals. Another explanation could be that large quantities of Ca²⁺ are released from the cell wall/apoplast during the preparation of the protein extracts from plant tissues, but not from protoplasts. Nevertheless, cpk3 knock-out mutants displayed a salt-sensitive phenotype, whereas CPK3 overexpression improved salt tolerance, and this effect correlated with CPK3 expression levels, as revealed by RT-PCR. Only sparse functional and in planta data on this particular CDPK have been published so far. Dammann et al. (2003) showed a cytosolic/nuclear localization of CPK3-GFP fusion proteins in roots, and Mori et al. (2006) showed that cpk3 cpk6 double knock-out plants displayed altered responses of vacuolar potassium channels in leaf guard cells in response to ABA, but that neither a direct phosphorylation of the channel itself nor a phenotype of the knock-out plants in response to stress was exhibited. The phenotype we observed for cpk3 mutants resembled that of MAPK mutants under similar stress conditions (Teige et al., 2004; Qiu et al., 2008b), which prompted us to extend the functional analysis of CPK3 in the salt stress response of Arabidopsis towards an analysis of the potential crosstalk between CPK3- and MAPK-dependent signalling, focussing on MPK4 and MPK6, which are the major players in the MAPK-mediated salt stress response.

Crosstalk between Ca²⁺ and MAPK signalling is well known for animal cells, were Ca²⁺ signals and calmodulines (CaMs) regulate the Ras/Raf/ERK-MAPK pathway (Agell et al., 2002; Rozengurt, 2007), but this general question has almost not been addressed in plants. Ludwig et al. (2005) reported ethylene-mediated crosstalk between CDPK and MAPK signalling, demonstrating that elevated CDPK activities compromised stress-induced MAPK activities by the overexpression of a truncated, and thereby deregulated, tobacco CDPK. This inhibition required ethylene synthesis and perception. In contrast, very recently Boudsocq et al. (2010) reported that CDPKs and MAPK cascades act differentially in regulatory programmes, in response to microbe-associated molecular patterns. In line with this latter report, our analysis provides no evidence for the interference of CPK3 kinase activity with MPK4 and MPK6 activities in response to salt stress, notably in both directions. The induction of salt stress-induced and MAPK-dependent marker genes (Teige et al., 2004; Qiu et al., 2008b), performed in a cpk3 knock-out and two independent CPK3 overexpressor lines, also indicated that MAPK target genes and salt-triggered transcriptional induction of response genes are not affected by CPK3. From these data we propose that CPK3 and MAPKs act independently, and in parallel, in the salt stress response. This is not necessarily valid for other stress responses, i.e. for pathogen stress, as Boudsocq et al. (2010) showed that transiently expressed and deregulated CPK3 is able to induce the flagellin-dependent NHL10 promoter in mesophyll protoplasts. Also in animal cells, quite different forms of crosstalk between Ca²⁺ and MAPK signalling have been published (Agell et al., 2002; Rozengurt, 2007).

The lack of transcriptional response of known salt stress-regulated marker genes in CPK3 knock-out or overexpressor lines in response to salt stress raised the question of how the salt-sensitive phenotype could be explained. In yeast, at least two signalling pathways are involved in the regulation of ion homeostasis and osmotic adjustment. The Ca²⁺-dependent phosphatase calcineurin regulates the expression of ion transporters like ENA1, the major Na⁺ efflux pump in the plasma membrane, and the MAPK Hog1 is required for transcriptional adaptation (Hohmann, 2002; Matsumoto et al., 2002). Hog1 also regulates the activities of the Nha1 Na⁺/H⁺ antiporter and the Tok1 potassium channel by phosphorylation (Proft and Struhl, 2004). This dual role of Hog1 in yeast osmostress adaptation appears to have split in the salt stress response in plants. Here, the MAPK pathway seems to be mainly responsible for the transcriptional induction of genes required for long-term adaptation, whereas CPK3 seems to regulate membrane-associated target proteins by phosphorylation in the immediate response.

So far, only a few proteomic studies of the plant salt stress response have been performed, and they have focused on the long-term changes in protein levels. Salt stress first causes a transient suppression of de novo protein synthesis in yeast and plant cells (Teige et al., 2001; Ndimba et al., 2005), and visible changes in total protein patterns can only be observed after several hours (Ndimba et al., 2005; Jiang et al., 2007). It is clear that an additional, immediate mechanism of adaptation is required to enable plant survival in an acute stress situation. Only one study has addressed the rapid changes in protein phosphorylation in response to salt stress in plants so far, and has reported the multiple phosphorylation of plasma membrane aquaporins (Prak et al., 2008), which were also identified in membrane fractions after 3 days of salt stress (Hsu et al., 2009).

Our proteomic search for potential CPK3 targets in microsomal fractions revealed no overlap with those two latter studies, but identified a number of proteins with known regulatory functions in signalling and stress response, including salt stress. The identification of three different 14-3-3 proteins, three PP2C-type protein phosphatases, two RAB GTPases, one protein kinase and several ion channels highlights the important function of membrane-associated signalling events, and is in line with recent proteomic studies of plant plasma membranes. The concept that specific lipid micro-environments – known as lipid rafts – cause a spatial organization of protein complexes with important functions in signalling was developed for animal cells years ago (Simons and Ikonen, 1997; Simons and Toomre, 2000), but only recently has evidence for this phenomenon been obtained for plant cells (Morel et al., 2006; Marmagne et al., 2007). Notably, a number of different CDPKs have been identified in proteomic studies of detergent-resistant plasma membranes from tobacco (Morel et al., 2006), and CPK9, CPK32 and CPK3 have been detected at plasma membranes in Arabidopsis (Nelson et al., 2006). CPK7, CPK10 and the DNA-binding remorin protein (At2g45820), which we identified with a high score as a potential CPK3 target in our analysis, were also found as differentially phosphorylated proteins in early elicitor signalling (Benschop et al., 2007). Moreover, this particular remorin is transcriptionally induced in response to salt stress (Kreps et al., 2002). Co-localization of the protein kinase and its targets would obviously favour fast and efficient signal transduction, particularly if the activating signal is extremely transient and locally restricted, as is the case for Ca²⁺ signals (Bootman et al., 2001). Accordingly KAB1, a potassium channel subunit, and the two voltage-dependent anion channels (VDACs), would present bona fide CPK3 targets. KAB1 responds to cyclic guanyl monophosphate (cGMP) signals, which are known to occur in response to salt or osmotic stress in plants (Maathuis, 2006). The vacuolar two-pore K⁺ channel TPK1 was reported to be phosphorylated at a 14-3-3 binding site (Latz et al., 2007), and this site proved recently to be phosphorylated by different CDPKs, including CPK3 (Latz et al. submitted). The early dehydration-induced gene ERD13, a glutathione-S-transferase, has been localized to the vacuole (Carter et al., 2004) and plasma membrane (Marmagne et al., 2007), and Ryu et al. (2009) showed that its overexpression conferred salt tolerance, and that its downregulation caused an increased salt sensitivity in Arabidopsis. In a functional screen for genes conferring salt tolerance to Arabidopsis, Du et al. (2008) isolated the 14-3-3 protein GRF3, which also localizes to the plasma membrane (Marmagne et al., 2007). 14-3-3 proteins do not only bind to phosphorylated proteins, notably at sites that are phosphorylated by CDPKs (Ishida et al., 2008), and also to CDPKs (Camoni et al., 1998), they are also known to be phosphorylated themselves (Aitken, 2002). A recent proteomic profiling of tandem affinity purified 14-3-3 protein complexes using GRF2 as bait revealed many channels involved in ion transport and hormone signalling, including the brassinolide receptors BRI1 and BAK1 (Chang et al., 2009). Considering that ERD13 has been isolated as an interacting partner of BAK1 in a yeast two-hybrid screen by Ryu et al. (2009), a new picture emerges where CPK3 could be a regulator of the interactions taking place in membrane-associated protein complexes.

The identification of three PP2C-type protein phosphatases, including one with predicted N-myristoylation and membrane localization (At3g02759), gives the first hints about negative regulators of CPK3. The importance of negative regulation is well known from ABA signalling, and recently a pathway where three PP2C phosphatases regulate the protein kinase SnRK2.6/OST1 has been described by Fujii et al. (2009). The observation that the aforementioned PP2C has also been identified in a screen for germination-specific transcripts (Bassel et al., 2008) adds further evidence to the functional context of CPK3 and the salt-sensitive germination phenotype.

CPK3 has been localised to the cytoplasm and the nucleus previously by Dammann et al. (2003), but a partial membrane association of CPK3 is also visible in their work. In line with these results, some cytoplasmic targets of CPK3 also appear in our proteomics analysis, and others have been reported recently by Rietz et al. (2010). We found a substantial level of CPK3 associated with different cellular membranes, depending on its N-myristoylation. We could clearly observe co-localization of CPK3-YFP with a vacuolar and a plasma membrane marker in infiltrated leaves, and a biochemical fractionation of endogenous CPK3 by two-phase partitioning confirmed its localization at the plasma membrane. Notably, this partitioning does not distinguish between remaining plasma membranes and other membranes in the lower phase, thus leaving the evidence for vacuolar localization of CPK3 based on the co-localization of the YFP fusion proteins. A similar complex localization pattern as found for CPK3 has been described for CPK32, which harbours N-myristoylation and palmitoylation sites (Choi et al., 2005). Notably CPK3 can only be N-myristoylated, but not palmitoylated, because of the lack of cysteine residues in its very N terminus. This might explain that CPK3 is not exclusively restricted to one particular membrane, as is the case for many of the N-myristoylated and palmitoylated CDPKs. CPK32 phosphorylates the bZIP transcription factor ABF4, a regulator of ABA-responsive gene expression, and thereby affects abiotic stress tolerance, including salt stress. ABF4 was also found to be phosphorylated by CPK4 and CPK11, two CDPKs that lack N-terminal acylation motifs, resulting in cytoplasmic and nuclear localization (Dammann et al., 2003), with similar effects on abiotic stress tolerance and germination (Zhu et al., 2007). A nuclear/cytoplasmic localization has also been reported for several plant MAPKs, including Arabidopsis MPK4 and MPK6 (Schweighofer et al., 2007). The activation of gene expression through MAPK cascades involves dynamic changes of their subcellular localization, also reflecting the localization of their potential targets (Lee et al., 2004). In this context, the observed N-myristoylation-dependent membrane localization of CPK3 would provide a molecular basis for the different tasks of CDPK and MAPK pathways in a plant’s salt stress response.

Experimental procedures

Plant cultivation

Arabidopsis thaliana (ecotype Columbia, Col-0) seeds were surface sterilized using the vapour-phase method (Clough and Bent, 1998). Sterile cultivation of was performed on half-strength MS agar plates, supplemented with 50 μg ml⁻¹ kanamycin when required. Plants were grown under 16 h of light with 120 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹ light intensity at 25°C. Seeds were stratified by incubation in the dark at 4°C for 2 days prior to placing them in the light. Germination assays were performed on agar plates containing quarter-strength Hoagland medium supplemented with 150 mm NaCl. Germination rates (per seeds) were scored after 6 days. The hydroponic cultivation of Arabidopsis plants was performed in half-strength Hoagland medium according to the method described by Tocquin et al. (2003).

Arabidopsis suspension culture and protoplast transformation

Arabidopsis protoplasts were prepared from a root suspension culture (Mathur and Koncz, 1998), and transient expression assays were performed as described by Cardinale et al. (2002). The open reading frame of CPK3 was cloned into the plant expression vector pRT100 (Topfer et al., 1987) and fused to a triple HA epitope at the C-terminal end.

Analysis of cpk3 T-DNA insertion lines

CPK3 T-DNA insertion lines (Figure S1) were obtained from the Salk Arabidopsis Insertion Library (http://signal.salk.edu) (Alonso et al., 2003). Kanamycin-resistant plants were propagated as individual lines and analysed by PCR, using gene- and T-DNA-specific primers to identify the positions of the T-DNA insertion. Further analysis of CPK3 expression was performed by semiquantitative RT-PCR analysis and western blotting.

Generation of CPK3 overexpressing lines

The CPK3 coding region was cloned into the binary plant expression vector pBIN19 (Datla et al., 1992) under the control of the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter and transformed as YFP-epitope-tagged versions into Col-0 wild-type plants using the floral-dip method (Clough and Bent, 1998). Transformed plants were selected on kanamycin-containing media, and CPK3 expression was analysed by RT-PCR.

Molecular cloning and construction of expression vectors

Open reading frames of studied MAPKs, CDPKs and TPK1 were amplified either from RAFL full-length cDNA clones (http://www.brc.riken.jp/lab/epd/Eng/species/arabidopsis.shtml) or from a cDNA library (Minet et al., 1992), introducing an NcoI or ApaI restriction site at the 5′ end and a NotI restriction site in front of the stop codon. The NotI restriction site at the 3′ end was used to fuse a triple HA epitope, YFP or mCherry tag.

Expression and purification of GST-fusion proteins

Escherichia coli strain BL-21 codon plus (Stratagene, http://www.stratagene.com) was transformed with expression constructs, cloned into the pGEX4-T1 vector (Amersham, http://www.gehealthcare.com). The growth of bacteria and isolation of recombinant GST fusion proteins were performed according to the method described by Matsuoka et al. (2002) using glutathione sepharose TM 4B (Amersham), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Proteins were eluted with 33 mm reduced glutathione, 250 mm NaCl, 0.5% Triton X-100 in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) Tween, which was changed to kinase buffer (20 mm HEPES, pH 7.5, 15 mm MgCl₂, 8 mm EDTA, 1 mm DTT) by using PD10 columns (Amersham).

Protein extracts from plant material

Proteins from all plant materials were extracted in protein extraction buffer (Bogre et al., 1999), containing 25 mm Tris, pH 7.8, 75 mm NaCl, 10 mm MgCl₂, 15 mm EGTA, 1 mm DTT, 1 mm NaF, 0.5 mm NaVO₃, 15 mmβ-glycero-phosphate, 15 mmp-nitrophenyl-phosphate, 0.1% Tween 20, 0.5 mm phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 5 μg ml⁻¹ leupeptin, and 5 μg ml⁻¹ aprotinin. Usually 200 mg of leaf material were ground in a 1.5-ml reaction tube in 200 μl of protein extraction buffer together with sea sand. Extracts were further clarified by centrifugation at 16 000 g for 10 min at 4°C.

In vitro testing for N-myristoylation

The coding regions of CPK2 and CPK3 were cloned into pBAT (Annweiler et al., 1991) after the introduction of an ApaI restriction site at the 5′ end, and a NotI site at the 3′ end. N-myristoylation of proteins was tested as described previously (Lu and Hrabak, 2002; Benetka et al., 2008) after coupled in vitro transcription/translation in a cell-free system (TNT Coupled Wheat Germ Extract System; Promega, http://www.promega.com). A 2-μg portion of plasmid template was linearized (NotI) and in vitro translated either in the presence of 10 μCi of l-[³⁵S]methionine (1175 Ci mmol⁻¹, for total protein labelling; Perkin Elmer, http://www.perkinelmer.com), or 50 μCi of [9,10-³H]-labelled myristic acid (60 Ci mmol⁻¹; American Radiolabeled Chemicals, http://www.arc-inc.com). Reaction products were separated on 10% (w/v) SDS-polyacrylamide gels, and incubated with autoradiography intensifier prior to detection on X-ray film.

Immunocomplex kinase assays

Immunocomplex kinase assays were performed according to Teige et al. (2004) using peptide-specific antibodies against CPK3 and the Arabidopsis MAPKs MPK4 and MPK6, as described by Teige et al. (2004). The procedure and the assay conditions are described in detail in Appendix S1.

Infiltration of tobacco leaves

Nicotiana tabaccum leaves were used for infiltration, as described in Bucher et al. (2003). YFP fusions of the coding regions of wild-type CPK3 and the corresponding G₂A mutant, YFP alone, TPK1 and CPK9 were cloned as KpnI–SacI fragments in the binary plant expression vector pBIN19. Proteins were transiently expressed under the control of the CaMV 35S promoter after infiltration of tobacco leaves with Agrobacteria. The pictures were taken 2 days after infiltration of developing young leaves using a Zeiss Axioplan laser scanning confocal microscope.

Two-phase separation for plasma membrane isolation

Plasma membranes were isolated in an aqueous two-phase system according to Santoni (2007), with minor modifications. A detailed description of the procedure and the composition of the buffers can be found in Appendix S1.

RNA isolation from Arabidopsis leaves and reverse-transcription PCR

Leaves from 2-week-old Arabidopsis plants were frozen in liquid nitrogen and 100 mg of leaf material was processed per sample. RT-PCR was carried out as described in detail by Doczi et al. (2007). Briefly, plant material was mixed with 130 μl RNA extraction buffer (1% SDS, 10 mm EDTA, 200 mm sodium acetate, pH 5.2), 130 μl phenol (pH 4.0) and sea sand, and then ground. RNA was subsequently extracted with phenol/chloroform/iso-amylalcohol and digested with RNAse-free DNAse (RQ1 DNAse; Promega). The concentration and purity of RNA was determined spectrophotometrically at 260 and 280 nm. A 2-μg portion of RNA was used for reverse transcription with M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Promega). PCR amplification of target genes was performed with GoTaq^© DNA polymerase (Promega), and products were separated on 1.5% agarose gels. A complete list of all primers and gene identifiers for the target genes is shown in Table S1.

2D gel electrophoresis and western blotting of Arabidopsis root extracts

Total root protein extracts were prepared using the phenol protein extraction method, according to Isaacson et al. (2006). A 100-μg portion of protein was separated by 2D gel electrophoresis as described in detail in Appendix S1, and then transferred to PVDF membranes. Detection of protein phosphorylation on threonine residues was performed using an anti-phosphothreonine antibody (Cell Signalling Technology, http://www.cellsignal.com).

Enzymatic digest, LC-MS/MS analysis and data analysis

Coomassie-stained gel spots were excised from the 2D gel and used for nano-electrospray LC-MS/MS investigations after a destaining tryptic digest. After separation on a C18 reverse phase column, mass spectra were obtained in an LTQ (Thermo, http://www.thermofisher.com) linear ion trap mass spectrometer, and MS/MS spectra were interpreted in Mascot 2.2 (Matrix Science, http://www.matrixscience.com) and Bioworks 3.3 (Thermo). The database used for the search was the TAIR9 protein database (ftp://ftp.arabidopsis.org/home/tair/Sequences/blast_datasets/TAIR9_blastsets/TAIR9). Further details on protein identification can be found in Appendix S1. To quantify the over-representation of CDPK consensus phosphorylation sites, we analysed the identified proteins for the presence of the following five overlapping CDPK phosphorylation motifs: [S]-X-[KRP], [RK]-X-X-[ST]-X-[KRP], [KR]-X-X-[ST], ϕ-X-[KR]-X-X-S-X-[KRP], or [RKHYCDE]-X-X-[KR]-X-X-S-X-X-[KR], see Huang et al. (2001), Cheng et al. (2002) and Hernandez Sebastia et al. (2004). Their over-representation was compared with the entire Arabidopsis proteome by summing up the probability for each motif to appear, as compared with the entire proteome, and normalising to the protein length. We termed the P-score of a protein X of length l as:

Where the motif i occurs a_i times in a given protein X, with the probability m_i to occur by chance in the total Arabidopsis proteome.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION

Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article:

Figure S1. Characterization of three independent T-DNA insertion lines obtained from the Salk Arabidopsis Insertion Library (http://signal.salk.edu).

Figure S2. Kinetics of CPK3 kinase activity in leaves and seedlings in response to salt stress.

Figure S3. Germination rates of CPK3 overexpressor lines under salt stress conditions.

Figure S4. Localisation of wild-type CPK3 and CPK3 G₂A mutants in leaves and chloroplast import.

Figure S5. Supporting material for Figure 3 (localization of wild-type CPK3 and CPK3 G₂A mutants, including bright-field images).

Figure S6. Crosstalk between MAPK and CPK3 kinase activities, and salt-induced induction of marker genes.

Figure S7. Loading control for comparison of threonine phosphorylation patterns of the Col-0 and cpk3-2 plants shown in Figure 4.

Figure S8. Phosphorylation of microsomal membranes by recombinant CPK3 and 2D gel separation for MS analysis.

Table S1. List of used oligonucleotides for cloning and PCR analysis.

Table S2. Identified proteins containing peptide sequences and scores.

Appendix S1. Detailed description of experimental procedures and materials.

Please note: As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer-reviewed and may be re-organized for online delivery, but are not copy-edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.