Dear Editor:
I would like to offer some comments on the article by Pary, et al., entitled “Managing Bipolar Depression.” which was published in the February issue of Psychiatry 2006 [Psychiatry 2006 2006;3(2):30–41]. First, Dr. Pary and colleagues should be commended for emphasizing that the treatment of bipolar disorder should focus on the disease entity itself and not merely on the acute episodes of mania or depression. This is particularly true when deciding whether and how long to utilize an antidepressant. Indeed, there are serious questions regarding the long-term utility of antidepressants in bipolar illness, aside from their potential for inducing a “switch” into mania.
I realize that a review cannot delve into the methodology of each study cited, and that several new studies have come out since the authors' article was prepared. However, it is important to note serious limitations in some studies cited in apparent support of antidepressant use in bipolar disorder. For example, the Altshuler, et al., study1 was observational, not randomized, and did not include rapid-cycling patients. It cannot be taken as firm evidence that all bipolar depressed patients should be maintained on antidepressants for the long-term, though a subgroup may require such treatment. The Gijsman, et al., meta-analysis,2 which appeared to show little risk of antidepressant-induced mania, did not review studies longer than 10 weeks in duration—a very short interval in the life of bipolar patients.
Furthermore, the Stanley Foundation Network3 has just analyzed the results of a randomized acute and maintenance treatment study of bipolar depression and found that antidepressant-related switches into hypomania and mania occurred in 11.4 and 7.9 percent, respectively, of the acute treatment trials; and in 21.8 and 14.9 percent, respectively, of the continuation trials. Longer-term switch rates continued to accumulate with the three agents studied (venlafaxine, bupropion, and sertraline). These are far from comforting numbers. Similarly, a preliminary analysis of the randomized STEP-BD study4 concluded that antidepressants have no added benefit in the long-term (one-year) treatment of bipolar patients who initially responded to antidepressants plus mood stabilizers.
Thus, while there may be no consensus regarding the treatment of acute bipolar depression, there is a growing consensus from randomized studies that long-term antidepressant use provides little benefit, and poses some risk, in the majority of bipolar patients.
The final comment I wish to make is that I believe there is an error in Table 7. It indicates that Paxil is “FDA approved for bipolar disorder.” To my knowledge, and based on a check of the recent Paxil prescribing information, I do not believe that is the case.
With regards,
Ronald Pies, MD
Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
References
- 1.Altshuler L, Suppes T, Black D, et al. Impact of antidepressant discontinuation after acute bipolar depression remission on rates of depressive relapse at 1-year follow up. Am J Psychiatry. 2003;160:1252–62. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.7.1252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gijsman HJ, Geddes JR, Rendell JM, et al. Antidepressants for bipolar depression: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Am J Psychiatry. 2004;161:1537–47. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.9.1537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Leverich GS, Altshuler LL, Fry MA, et al. Risk of switch in mood polarity to hypomania or mania in patients with bipolar depression during acute and continuation trials of venlafaxine, sertraline, and bupropion as adjuncts to mood stabilizers. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163:232–9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.2.232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ghaemi SN, El-Mallakh RS, Baldassano CF, et al. A randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety of long-term antidepressant use in bipolar disorder (abstract) Bipolar Disorders. 2005;7(Suppl 2):59. [Google Scholar]
