Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2010 Aug 21;21(12):1966–1968. doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2010.08.006

Native Electrospray and Electron-Capture Dissociation in FTICR Mass Spectrometry Provide Top-Down Sequencing of a Protein Component in an Intact Protein Assembly

Hao Zhang 1, Weidong Cui 1, Jianzhong Wen 1, Robert E Blankenship 1, Michael L Gross 1,
PMCID: PMC2991543  NIHMSID: NIHMS236365  PMID: 20843701

Abstract

The intact yeast alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) tetramer of 147 kDa was introduced into a FTICR mass spectrometer by native electrospray. Electron capture dissociation of the entire 23+ to 27+ charge state distribution produced the expected charge-reduced ions and, more unexpectedly, 39 c-type peptide fragments that identified N-terminus acetylation and the first 55 amino acids. The results are in accord with the crystal structure of yeast ADH, which shows that the C-terminus is buried at the assembly interface whereas the N-terminus is exposed, allowing ECD to occur. This remarkable observation shows promise that a top-down approach will be effective for characterizing their components, inferring their interfaces, and obtaining both proteomics and structural biology information in one experiment.

Introduction

Mass spectrometry (MS) is evolving as an important approach for investigating intact, large protein assemblies in the gas phase [1], augmenting other approaches [2]. Advances in quadrupole time-of-flight instruments and ion mobility have underpinned this new role in structural biology [35]. Determinations of molecular weight, stoichiometry, and assembly patterns of essential biological assemblies as large as MDa hepatitis B virus assemblies are now possible [6].

To identify the constituents of a protein complex, information about the subunits of a complex is needed. Collisionally activated dissociation (CAD) [1], black-body infrared dissociation (BIRD) [7], electron-capture dissociation (ECD) [8], infrared multiphoton dissociation (IRMPD) [9], and surface-induced dissociation (SID) [10] can yield some sequence information for proteins in large assemblies. For example, multiple collisions at keV laboratory energy demonstrate that native protein complexes can be disassembled into peptide fragments [11]. ECD [12], now an established tool for top-down sequencing and for determining post-translational modifications, can successfully characterize, in part, proteins of MW up to 200 kDa [13] and noncovalent protein-ligand complexes [14]. Applications of ECD to protein–protein assemblies [8], however, are sparse.

ECD and FT (Fourier Transform) ion cyclotron resonance (ICR) MS combine as an appealing approach for study of protein assemblies because, in principle, the masses of the complex and of the subunits, as well as some sequence of the constituents can be acquired in a single experiment. Indeed, we report here a successful ECD-based FT ICRMS top-down approach that affords the composition, stoichiometry, and partial sequence of a 147 kDa noncovalent protein assembly; namely, the yeast alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) tetramer.

Experimental

Fresh yeast alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) complex (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) (1.7 μM) was prepared by buffer exchange before every experiment and sprayed from aqueous NH4OAc (1 M). Custom spray tips were pulled from Polymicro silicon tubing (360 μm OD, 150 μm ID) by using a microcapillary puller (Sutter Instrument Co). The sample solution was infused at 25–100 nL/min (Harvard syringe pump). A Bruker SolariX 12 T FTICR mass spectrometer with capabilities for CAD, ETD, ECD and sustained off-resonance irradiation (SORI) was used for analysis.

Results and Discussion

We successfully sprayed (native ESI) the yeast alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) assembly, obtaining significantly lower charged proteins (23+ to 27+, Fig. 1A) compared to what would be observed by non-native ESI. Charge deconvolution gave a MW of 147.5 kDa, verifying that we had introduced the tetramer.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(A) Mass spectrum and (B) ECD production spectrum of the yeast ADH complex.

We conducted collisional activation in the front end of the hybrid instrument (prior to the FT-ICR trap) and found it to be inadequate to fragment the complex, suggesting tight binding of the protein constituents. We also were unable to detect any fragments by using electron-transfer dissociation (ETD). Given the large m/z difference of the complex and ETD reagent ion, the precursor ions may not have optimally situated for the ETD reaction. We considered front-end selection by the quadrupole mass analyzer, but this is not yet possible for ions in this m/z range. When we attempted in-trap isolation and ECD of the most abundant 26+ charge state, only charge reduction was observed owing to poor dynamic range. The observation matches that of Geel [8] on ECD of the 84 kDa gp31 heptamer; only charge reduction and no peptide fragments were produced. The high MW ion packet isolated inside the ICR trap was likely displaced from the cell center owing to perturbations from the waveforms used for isolation. This led to poorer overlap between the electron beam for ECD and the stored ion packet than when activating lower m/z ions [15].

When we submitted the entire charge-state distribution to ECD, without isolation, we obtained a remarkable result (Fig. 1B) whereby the precursor ions were completely depleted, and two types of product ions formed: (1) a set of peptide fragments of m/z < 2000 and (2) charge-reduced precursors down to at least 10+, accompanied presumably by high m/z ions that are complements to the peptide fragments. To our knowledge, this is the first observation of peptide fragments produced directly by ECD from a protein constituent of a protein assembly.

Analysis of the low m/z pattern shows that the first residue is acetylated serine, not methionine. Moreover, 39 c-type ions up to the 55th residue form in the fragmentation from the N terminus (Figure 2). Missing in the pattern are ions from chain cleavages at Pro23, 25, 27, and 55, which cannot be seen because there is no mass change when the 5-membered ring is cleaved to give a c-type ion. Nevertheless, those fragments that are produced identify the protein (see below).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

ECD mass spectrum of the ADH complex over the low m/z range of Figure 1.

Moreover, the fragments are consistent with the X-ray crystal structure (Figure 3) that shows the N terminus is free and available for fragmentation whereas the C terminus is buried at the interface. In this case, the transition to the gas phase preserves sufficient solid-state structure to enable these phenomena. This complex is a dimer of dimers [16], held together by nearly a score of salt bridges [17]. The ionic forces that maintain protein higher order structure and hold together assemblies of this nature become stronger in the gas phase, suggesting why ECD affords sequence information rather than disrupts the assembly. It also explains why we can sequence through the first 55 residues of the N terminus, which is not involved in the interface. Further, the complementary z-ions are likely seen for each of the charge-reduced species at slightly lower m/z, dispersed by their complex isotope patterns.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

ADH sequence showing the sites of ECD cleavages (top) and crystal structure of the yeast ADH tetramer (2HCY in PDB) with the N-terminal 55 residues that were sequenced highlighted in red (bottom).

One means to characterize large protein complexes by MS is a “bottom-up” strategy whereby the proteins are denatured leading to release of the subunits, the components separated and proteolyzed, or simply proteolyzed, and LC/tandem MS and database searching are applied to identify the constituents. More refinement comes from high performance QToF MS of macromolecular assemblies, revealing stoichiometry and connectivity of subunits [4]. Our observation suggests tha a top-down approach for characterization of protein complexes directly by tandem mass spectrometry will be successful.

Assuming the constituents of this complex are unknown and that top-down sequencing can be successful, we tested whether the sequence from ECD was sufficient to identify the protein. Although there are a number of ways to accomplish this, we chose to generate sequence tags [18] (7–20 amino acid) by using Bruker™ Biotools and extended them with consideration of the proline gaps. We then submitted the three longest tags to Mascot searching against the NCBI database with a mass tolerance of 0.02 Da to identify the published Chain A, yeast alcohol dehydrogenase I (gi 112491285) containing 347 residues and having MW of 36.7 kDa. The Mascot peptide score was 294 (expectation value 1.5e-16). Given that the measured molecular weight of the complex is 147.5 kDa, it is straightforward to conclude that four ADH monomers make up the whole assembly.

This approach using FTICR MS applied to the yeast ADH assembly afforded the MW of the complex. More importantly, ECD generated sufficient sequence information to identify reliably the constituent protein. Given the long run of ECD fragments, one can pinpoint that region of the protein that is relatively free in the ADH tetramer, and likely to be remote from the interface of this gas-phase assembly.

More generally, this “top-down” approach may offer a more efficient and simpler procedure than a “bottom-up” approach for characterization of each constituent in a macromolecular assembly. Furthermore, as a one-step protocol, it demonstrates the integration of MS-based proteomics and structural biology in one platform and satisfies a sought-after goal [19]. In future experiments, we will focus on methodology; namely development of front-end preselection of precursor ions for ECD and addition of IRMPD to the platform for better fragmentation efficiency. We are also studying other homogeneous and ultimately heterogeneous assemblies, the results of which will be the subject of future publications.

Acknowledgments

Research funding was from the National Center for Research Resource of the NIH (Grant P41RR000954), and instrumentation funding was from the High-End Instrument program of the NCRR (Grant 1S10 025101)

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Benesch JL, Ruotolo BT, Simmons DA, Robinson CV. Protein complexes in the gas phase: technology for structural genomics and proteomics. Chem Rev. 2007;107(8):3544–67. doi: 10.1021/cr068289b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Robinson CV, Sali A, Baumeister W. The molecular sociology of the cell. Nature. 2007;450:973–82. doi: 10.1038/nature06523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Benesch JL. Collisional activation of protein complexes: picking up the pieces. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2009;20:341–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2008.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sharon M. How far can we go with structural mass spectrometry of protein complexes? J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2010;21:487–500. doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2009.12.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.van Duijn E. Current limitations in native mass spectrometry based structural biology. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2010;21:971–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2009.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Uetrecht C, Versluis CW, NR, Roos WH, Wuite GJL, Wingfield PT, Steven AC, Heck A., JR High-resolution mass spectrometry of viral assemblies: Molecular composition and stability of dimorphic hepatitis B virus capsids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:9216–9220. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0800406105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Felitsyn N, Kitova EN, Klassen JS. Thermal decomposition of a gaseous multiprotein complex studied by blackbody infrared radiative dissociation. Investigating the origin of the asymmetric dissociation behavior. Anal Chem. 2001;73:4647–61. doi: 10.1021/ac0103975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Geels RB, van der Vies SM, Heck AJ, Heeren RM. Electron capture dissociation as structural probe for noncovalent gas-phase protein assemblies. Anal Chem. 2006;78:7191–6. doi: 10.1021/ac060960p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.El-Faramawy A, Guo Y, Verkerk U, Thomson BA, Siu M. Evaluation of IR Multiphoton Dissociation as a Method for High Mass Protein Clean Up. 56th ASMS Conference on Mass Spectrometry; Denver, Colorado. 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jones CM, Beardsley RL, Galhena AS, Dagan S, Cheng G, Wysocki VH. Symmetrical gas-phase dissociation of noncovalent protein complexes via surface collisions. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:15044–5. doi: 10.1021/ja064586m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Benesch JL, Ruotolo BT, Sobott F, Wildgoose J, Gilbert A, Bateman R, Robinson CV. Quadrupole-time-of-flight mass spectrometer modified for higher-energy dissociation reduces protein assemblies to peptide fragments. Anal Chem. 2009;81:1270–4. doi: 10.1021/ac801950u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zubarev RA, Kelleher NL, McLafferty FW. Electron Capture Dissociation of Multiply Charged Protein Cations. A Nonergodic Process. J Am Chem Soc. 1998;120:3265–6. doi: 10.1021/ac990811p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Han X, Jin M, Breuker K, McLafferty FW. Extending top-down mass spectrometry to proteins with masses greater than 200 kilodaltons. Science. 2006;314:109–12. doi: 10.1126/science.1128868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Xie Y, Zhang J, Yin S, Loo JA. Top-down ESI-ECD-FT-ICR mass spectrometry localizes noncovalent protein-ligand binding sites. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128 (45):14432–3. doi: 10.1021/ja063197p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Guan SB, AL High Mass Selectivity for Top-Down Proteomics by Application of SWIFT Technology. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2010;21 (3):455–459. doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2009.11.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Powers ETP, DL A perspective on mechanisms of protein tetramer formation. Biophys J. 2003;85:3587–3599. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74777-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Casadio R, Martelli PLGA, Rossi M, Raia CA. A low-resolution 3D model of the tetrameric alcohol dehydrogenase from Sulfolobus solfataricus. Protein Eng. 2002;15 (3):215–223. doi: 10.1093/protein/15.3.215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mortz EOC, PB, Roepstorf P, Kelleher NL, Wood TD, McLafferty FW, Mann M. Sequence tag identification of intact proteins by matching tanden mass spectral data against sequence data bases. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1996;93 (16):8264–8267. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.16.8264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhou M, Robinson CV. When proteomics meets structural biology. Trends Biochem Sci. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2010.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES