Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Dec 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Neuroimmunol. 2010 Dec 15;229(1-2):3–4. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2010.08.025

miRNAs in Multiple Sclerosis: Regulating the Regulators

Mireia Guerau-de-Arellano 1, Amy E Lovett-Racke 2, Michael K Racke 1
PMCID: PMC2991561  NIHMSID: NIHMS244447  PMID: 20888650

The exact etiology and underlying cause of multiple sclerosis (MS) remains obscure, but a dysregulation of the T cell response to myelin antigens appears to play a critical role in MS pathogenesis (Frohman et al., 2006). In healthy individuals, self-reactive T cells are controlled by a highly specialized T cell subset- the regulatory T cell or Treg- but this process appears to be impaired in MS. Reduced Treg activity in MS was first described by Viglietta et al. (2004), who isolated CD4+CD25high T cells from peripheral blood of healthy controls and relapsing-remitting (RR) MS patients and compared their ability to suppress the proliferation of polyclonally activated CD4+CD25- T cells (Viglietta et al., 2004). The suppressive activity of MS Tregs was far less than those from healthy controls when moderate (anti-CD3) stimulation was used. Other groups expanded these findings using myelin antigen-specific stimulation (Haas et al., 2005; Kumar et al., 2006). In addition, MS Tregs have reduced Foxp3 expression (Huan et al., 2005; Venken et al., 2008b) possibly explaining the reduced suppressive activity of these cells. These findings have been challenged, based on the fact that the CD4+CD25high population is not entirely specific for Tregs. Tregs were first found to be enriched in the CD4+CD25high subset by the Sakaguchi group (Sakaguchi et al., 1995). Since CD25, the high affinity IL-2R chain, is also expressed by recently activated T cells, a great deal of effort has been undertaken to find Treg-specific markers. Foxp3 was identified as a transcription factor required for Treg development and function that distinguishes Tregs from other cells (Hori et al., 2003). However, the detection of this nuclear transcription factor requires membrane permeabilization and is therefore incompatible with the isolation of live cells required for further functional testing. In 2006, several groups reported that the CD4+CD25+CD127low/− population distinguishes human Tregs from activated T cells (Liu et al., 2006; Seddiki et al., 2006). Michel et al did not find a functional defect in MS patients’ Tregs after eliminating CD127high cells (Michel et al., 2008). However, some groups localize the MS Treg defect to the naïve recent thymic emigrant Treg population and attribute the aforementioned disagreement to differences in the analyzed naïve versus memory Treg populations (Venken et al., 2008a).

Despite the clear involvement of genetic and environmental factors in the development of MS, the specific genetic elements mediating the immune pathology of MS have remained elusive (Milo and Kahana, 2010). Myelin-specific T cell responses may be initiated upon exposure to infectious agents, which could explain the characteristic northern geographical distribution of MS. The propensity of MS patients’ T cells to activation, pathogenic Th cell differentiation or reduced Treg activity upon antigen exposure is influenced by genetics as well. Increases in genetic material sharing, from distant family members to monozygotic twins, result in dramatic increases in the odds ratio of developing MS (Compston and Coles, 2008). Although considerable effort has been devoted to the identification of MS susceptibility genes, only a handful of gene polymorphisms, including the MHC, IL-2R and IL7R, have been clearly linked to MS (Zuvich et al., 2009). Combined, the identified genes can only explain a small percentage of the genetic component of MS, leaving an important gap to fill. A twist in our understanding of how genetics influence disease comes from the recent recognition that miRNAs, a class of non-coding RNAs, have a profound impact on gene expression through mRNA destabilization and/or protein translation inhibition (Ambros, 2004). miRNAs are encoded in the genome and are therefore genetic elements, but many miRNAs are also up-regulated in response to viral infections (Yin et al., 2008). Therefore, miRNA expression may be altered by both gene polymorphisms and environmental factors.

miRNAs are encoded in the genome and are transcribed in the nucleus as primary RNAs (pri-miRNA) of several hundred nucleotides containing a hairpin structure (Cullen, 2004). Pri-miRNAS are then cleaved by the Drosha/DGCR8 complex into ~70 ntd hairpin precursor miRNAs (pre-miRNAs) that are exported into the cytoplasm by Exportin5. Once in the cytoplasm, pre-miRNAs are processed by Dicer to yield 19–24 nucleotide double stranded (ds) RNA. Only one strand is the mature miRNA that is loaded onto the RISC complex to mediate target mRNA destabilization and translation inhibition (Cullen, 2004). As of Sept 2009, over 1000 mature miRNAs had been identified in humans (http://www.mirbase.org). miRNAs are highly conserved between species, attesting to their functional importance (Tanzer and Stadler, 2006) and modulate a myriad of cellular processes, from differentiation to proliferation or apoptosis. miRNAs influence immune cell development, and their role in the maintenance of tolerance is just beginning to be recognized (Tili et al., 2008). miRNAs have been recently sought as biomarkers in MS. Two studies have found differences in miRNA expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of RRMS patients (Keller et al., 2009; Otaegui et al., 2009). Although there was little overlap between the identified miRNAs in both studies, possibly due to differences in the patient treatment status, they highlight the potential of miRNAs as MS and/or treatment effectiveness biomarkers. More recently, Du et al and Lindberg et al have found miRNAs differentially expressed in MS T cells and implicated them in pathogenic Th17 differentiation (Du et al., 2009) and activation (Lindberg et al., 2010), respectively. In this issue, De Santis et al identify miRNAs altered in regulatory T cells of MS patients that may mediate the reduced anti-inflammatory activity of this T cell population observed in MS patients {De Santis}.

DeSantis et al isolated CD4+CD25high Treg cells from 12 MS patients and 14 healthy donors and analyzed the expression of 723 miRNAs by microarray analysis. They found 23 miRNAs differentially expressed (more than 1.5 fold change) in MS vs healthy Tregs. Most of these miRNAs were up-regulated in MS vs healthy controls and only a fourth of them were down-regulated. This might indicate that increased silencing (of Treg-specific genes) in MS Tregs is associated with reduced suppressive activity. Several of these miRNAs were confirmed to be up-regulated in a second set of MS patients and healthy donors when utilizing the more stringent CD4+CD25highCD127low Treg definition, albeit the detected changes were less remarkable, perhaps reminiscent of the more similar functional activity detected in Tregs defined by low CD127 expression. Several of the up-regulated miRNAs (miR106b, miR-19a, miR19b, miR25) belong to the miR-106b/25 cluster that is involved in modulating the TGFbeta pathway by silencing CDKN1A/p21 and BCL2L11/Bim (Petrocca et al., 2008). The miR-17-92 cluster that has also been proposed to contribute to TGFbeta pathway inhibition was also found to be up-regulated in MS (Petrocca et al., 2008). Taken together, these miRNAs may collaboratively suppress Treg development and/or function and explain the reduced Treg activity in MS.

There are several important diagnostic and therapeutic implications of these findings. First, MS-associated miRNAs may be of use in identifying MS in its early stages. The Treg defect in MS appears to be present during the RRMS phase of the disease, but not during the secondary progressive phase (SPMS) (Venken et al., 2006) and the associated miRNAs may prove to follow a similar pattern. It would be interesting to determine whether the miRNA pattern is present in individuals that respond to therapies that reportedly improve Treg function, such as glatiramer acetate (Cui et al., 2009; Haas et al., 2009; Jee et al., 2007; Venken et al., 2008a), as it could be used as a predictor of treatment efficacy. Finally, significant effort is being devoted as we speak to development of miRNA inhibitors as therapeutic agents for several diseases, and inhibitors targeting those miRNAs dysregulated in MS may be able to restore Treg activity while having few side effects, particularly if Treg specific delivery can be achieved.

A small piece of the puzzle on how miRNAs modulate the immunopathogenesis of MS has been revealed. We expect more discoveries to come. It will be particularly interesting to learn not only how miRNAs modulate T cells in MS but also how we can limit or harness their power for therapeutic purposes.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  1. Ambros V. The functions of animal microRNAs. Nature. 2004;431:350–355. doi: 10.1038/nature02871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Compston A, Coles A. Multiple sclerosis. Lancet. 2008;372:1502–1517. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61620-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cui G, Zhang Y, Gong Z, Zhang JZ, Zang YQ. Induction of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cell response by glatiramer acetate in type 1 diabetes. Cell Res. 2009;19:574–583. doi: 10.1038/cr.2009.12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cullen BR. Transcription and processing of human microRNA precursors. Mol Cell. 2004;16:861–865. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Du C, Liu C, Kang J, Zhao G, Ye Z, Huang S, Li Z, Wu Z, Pei G. MicroRNA miR-326 regulates TH-17 differentiation and is associated with the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. Nat Immunol. 2009;10:1252–1259. doi: 10.1038/ni.1798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Frohman EM, Racke MK, Raine CS. Multiple sclerosis--the plaque and its pathogenesis. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:942–955. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra052130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Haas J, Hug A, Viehover A, Fritzsching B, Falk CS, Filser A, Vetter T, Milkova L, Korporal M, Fritz B, Storch-Hagenlocher B, Krammer PH, Suri-Payer E, Wildemann B. Reduced suppressive effect of CD4+CD25high regulatory T cells on the T cell immune response against myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein in patients with multiple sclerosis. Eur J Immunol. 2005;35:3343–3352. doi: 10.1002/eji.200526065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Haas J, Korporal M, Balint B, Fritzsching B, Schwarz A, Wildemann B. Glatiramer acetate improves regulatory T-cell function by expansion of naive CD4(+)CD25(+)FOXP3(+)CD31(+) T-cells in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol. 2009;216:113–117. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2009.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hori S, Nomura T, Sakaguchi S. Control of regulatory T cell development by the transcription factor Foxp3. Science. 2003;299:1057–1061. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Huan J, Culbertson N, Spencer L, Bartholomew R, Burrows GG, Chou YK, Bourdette D, Ziegler SF, Offner H, Vandenbark AA. Decreased FOXP3 levels in multiple sclerosis patients. J Neurosci Res. 2005;81:45–52. doi: 10.1002/jnr.20522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jee Y, Piao WH, Liu R, Bai XF, Rhodes S, Rodebaugh R, Campagnolo DI, Shi FD, Vollmer TL. CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells contribute to the therapeutic effects of glatiramer acetate in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Clin Immunol. 2007;125:34–42. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2007.05.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Keller A, Leidinger P, Lange J, Borries A, Schroers H, Scheffler M, Lenhof HP, Ruprecht K, Meese E. Multiple sclerosis: microRNA expression profiles accurately differentiate patients with relapsing-remitting disease from healthy controls. PLoS One. 2009;4:e7440. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kumar M, Putzki N, Limmroth V, Remus R, Lindemann M, Knop D, Mueller N, Hardt C, Kreuzfelder E, Grosse-Wilde H. CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ T lymphocytes fail to suppress myelin basic protein-induced proliferation in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol. 2006;180:178–184. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2006.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lindberg RL, Hoffmann F, Mehling M, Kuhle J, Kappos L. Altered expression of miR-17-5p in CD4+ lymphocytes of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients. Eur J Immunol. 2010;40:888–898. doi: 10.1002/eji.200940032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Liu W, Putnam AL, Xu-Yu Z, Szot GL, Lee MR, Zhu S, Gottlieb PA, Kapranov P, Gingeras TR, Fazekas de St Groth B, Clayberger C, Soper DM, Ziegler SF, Bluestone JA. CD127 expression inversely correlates with FoxP3 and suppressive function of human CD4+ T reg cells. J Exp Med. 2006;203:1701–1711. doi: 10.1084/jem.20060772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Michel L, Berthelot L, Pettre S, Wiertlewski S, Lefrere F, Braudeau C, Brouard S, Soulillou JP, Laplaud DA. Patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis have normal Treg function when cells expressing IL-7 receptor alpha-chain are excluded from the analysis. J Clin Invest. 2008;118:3411–3419. doi: 10.1172/JCI35365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Milo R, Kahana E. Multiple sclerosis: geoepidemiology, genetics and the environment. Autoimmun Rev. 2010;9:A387–A394. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2009.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Otaegui D, Baranzini SE, Armananzas R, Calvo B, Munoz-Culla M, Khankhanian P, Inza I, Lozano JA, Castillo-Trivino T, Asensio A, Olaskoaga J, Lopez de Munain A. Differential micro RNA expression in PBMC from multiple sclerosis patients. PLoS One. 2009;4:e6309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Petrocca F, Vecchione A, Croce CM. Emerging role of miR-106b-25/miR-17-92 clusters in the control of transforming growth factor beta signaling. Cancer Res. 2008;68:8191–8194. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sakaguchi S, Sakaguchi N, Asano M, Itoh M, Toda M. Immunologic self-tolerance maintained by activated T cells expressing IL-2 receptor alpha-chains (CD25). Breakdown of a single mechanism of self-tolerance causes various autoimmune diseases. J Immunol. 1995;155:1151–1164. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Seddiki N, Santner-Nanan B, Martinson J, Zaunders J, Sasson S, Landay A, Solomon M, Selby W, Alexander SI, Nanan R, Kelleher A, Fazekas de St Groth B. Expression of interleukin (IL)-2 and IL-7 receptors discriminates between human regulatory and activated T cells. J Exp Med. 2006;203:1693–1700. doi: 10.1084/jem.20060468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Tanzer A, Stadler PF. Evolution of microRNAs. Methods Mol Biol. 2006;342:335–350. doi: 10.1385/1-59745-123-1:335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Tili E, Michaille JJ, Costinean S, Croce CM. MicroRNAs, the immune system and rheumatic disease. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2008;4:534–541. doi: 10.1038/ncprheum0885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Venken K, Hellings N, Broekmans T, Hensen K, Rummens JL, Stinissen P. Natural naive CD4+CD25+CD127low regulatory T cell (Treg) development and function are disturbed in multiple sclerosis patients: recovery of memory Treg homeostasis during disease progression. J Immunol. 2008a;180:6411–6420. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.9.6411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Venken K, Hellings N, Hensen K, Rummens JL, Medaer R, D'Hooghe M B, Dubois B, Raus J, Stinissen P. Secondary progressive in contrast to relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients show a normal CD4+CD25+ regulatory T-cell function and FOXP3 expression. J Neurosci Res. 2006;83:1432–1446. doi: 10.1002/jnr.20852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Venken K, Hellings N, Thewissen M, Somers V, Hensen K, Rummens JL, Medaer R, Hupperts R, Stinissen P. Compromised CD4+ CD25(high) regulatory T-cell function in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis is correlated with a reduced frequency of FOXP3-positive cells and reduced FOXP3 expression at the single-cell level. Immunology. 2008b;123:79–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2007.02690.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Viglietta V, Baecher-Allan C, Weiner HL, Hafler DA. Loss of functional suppression by CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Exp Med. 2004;199:971–979. doi: 10.1084/jem.20031579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Yin Q, McBride J, Fewell C, Lacey M, Wang X, Lin Z, Cameron J, Flemington EK. MicroRNA-155 is an Epstein-Barr virus-induced gene that modulates Epstein-Barr virus-regulated gene expression pathways. J Virol. 2008;82:5295–5306. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02380-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Zuvich RL, McCauley JL, Pericak-Vance MA, Haines JL. Genetics and pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. Semin Immunol. 2009;21:328–333. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2009.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES