Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Nov 8.
Published in final edited form as: Organometallics. 2010 Nov 8;29(21):5010–5025. doi: 10.1021/om1002528

Synthesis, Characterization, and Reactions of Isolable (β-Diketiminato)Nb(III) Imido Complexes*

Neil C Tomson 1, John Arnold 1,*, Robert G Bergman 1,*
PMCID: PMC2992439  NIHMSID: NIHMS222014  PMID: 21116450

Abstract

We have investigated both the chemical reduction of (BDI)Nb(V) imido complexes (BDI = HC[C(Me)NAr]2; Ar = 2,6-iPr2-C6H3) to the formal Nb(III) oxidation state and the ability of these Nb(III) complexes to behave as two-electron reductants. The reduction of the Nb(V) species was found to depend heavily on the nature of available supporting ligands, but the chemistry of the reduced compounds proceeded cleanly with a number of unsaturated organic reagents. Accordingly, the novel Nb(V) bis(imido) complexes supported by the monoazabutadiene (mad) ligand (mad)Nb(NtBu)(NAr)(L′) (L′ = py, thf) were formed by either KC8 reduction of (BDI)Nb(NtBu)Cl2(py) in the absence of strong π-acids or by H2 reduction of the Nb(V) dimethyl complex (BDI)Nb(NtBu)Me2 in THF. These products are likely formed though an intramolecular, 2 e reductive C–N bond cleavage, as has been observed previously for related Group 4 systems, suggesting that transient Nb(III) intermediates were present in both cases. In the presence of 1,2-bis(dimethylphosphino)ethane (dmpe), KC8 reduction of (BDI)Nb(NtBu)Cl2(py) was arrested at the Nb(IV) oxidation state to give (BDI)Nb(NtBu)Cl(dmpe), which was characterized by solution-state EPR spectroscopy as a Nb-centered paramagnet with strong coupling to the two equivalent phosphorus nuclei (Aiso{93Nb} = 120.5×10−4 cm−1, Aiso{31P} = 31.0×10−4 cm−1, giso = 1.9815). When strong π-acids were used to intercept the thermally unstable Nb(III) complex (BDI)Nb(NtBu)(py) prior to reductive cleavage of the ligand C–N bond, the thermally stable Nb(III) species (BDI)Nb(NtBu)(CX)2(L″) (X = O, L″ = py; X = NXyl, L″ = CNXyl; Xyl = 2,6-Me2-C6H3) were obtained in good yields. The Nb(III) complexes (BDI)Nb(NtBu)py, (BDI)Nb(NtBu)(CO)2(py) and (BDI)Nb(NtBu)(CO)2 were subsequently investigated for their ability to serve as two-electron reducing reagents for both metal-ligand multiple bond formation and for the reduction of organic π-systems. The reduction of mesityl azide by (BDI)Nb(NtBu)(py) and diphenylsulfoxide by (BDI)Nb(NtBu)(CO)2 led to the monomeric bis(imido) and dimeric oxo complexes (BDI)Nb(NtBu)(NMes)(py) and [(BDI)Nb(NtBu)]22-O)2, respectively. MeLi addition to (BDI)Nb(NtBu)(CO)2(py) resulted in the formation of a Nb-acylate via methide addition to one of the carbonyl carbons. The acylate product was revealed to have a short Nb–Cacylate bond distance (2.059(4) Å), consistent with multiple Nb–C bond character resulting from Nb(III) back-bonding into the acylate carbon. The interaction of (BDI)Nb(NtBu)(CO)2 with two equivalents of 4,4′-dichlorobenzophenone resulted in the clean, quantitative formation of the corresponding pinacol coupling product, but introduction of the ketone in 1: 1 molar ratios resulted in mixtures of the pinacol product and the starting material, suggesting that ketone coordination to the Nb(III) complex may be reversible. Relatedly, addition of 1-phenyl-1-propyne to (BDI)Nb(NtBu)(CO)2 formed a thermally unstable 1: 1 Nb/alkyne complex, as characterized by NMR and IR spectroscopies; reaction of this species with HCl/MeOH yielded a 2: 1 mixture of 1-phenyl-1-propene and the free alkyne, suggesting a high degree of covalency in the Nb–C bonds.

Introduction

Use of the reducing capability of early-metal complexes in the d2 electronic state is a powerful tool in synthetic chemistry.1,2 From an organic perspective, the ability to form C–C bonds via the reductive coupling of unsaturated organic molecules (alkenes, alkynes, ketones, ketimines, etc.) has provided general routes to dienes, amino alcohols, diols, and bicyclic products. In a related sense, the formation of reactive multiple bonds between early-metals and p-block-based ligands can be effected through a number of two-electron reductions of organic substrates, leading variously to early-metal alkylidenes, imidos and oxos.

One area of early-metal d2 chemistry that has enjoyed considerable attention for C–C bond forming reactivity is that of the Cp2MLn2 systems (Cp = cyclopentadienyl; M = Ti, Zr; Ln = neutral 2e donor).37 Mechanisms leading to the new C–C bonds from the d2 metallocenes commonly involve the initial formation of a three-membered metallacycle by binding an unsaturated substrate to the metallocene with loss of the L-type ligands – formally a 2e reduction of the incoming ligand.811 Subsequent insertion of another unsaturated molecule into one of the newly formed M–C bonds results in a new C–C σ-bond as part of a five-membered metallacycle (Scheme 1).2 Such metallacycles are often hydrolyzed to obtain the products of stoichiometric reductive coupling, but in certain cases the coupling reactions have been rendered catalytic by way of protonolysis/reductive elimination pathways or by dialkylation of electrophiles (CO, CNR) followed by ketone/imine dissociation.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

12

Relatedly, the formation of multiple metal-ligand bonds via oxidation of early-metal d2 complexes with cleavable 2e oxidants (e.g. M=NR from RN3, M=O from R2SO, M=CR2 from N2CR2, etc.) can provide facile entry into reactive complexes while avoiding difficulties encountered with generating these species through redox-neutral substitution routes.13,14 Redox-based methods for the introduction of Y2− (Y = NR, O, CR2, etc.) ligands also have the advantage of creating generally innocuous and volatile by-products (e.g. N2, R2S, etc.), which can aid in the isolation of what are often low-coordinate and electron-deficient complexes.

A common limitation to both the organic and transition-metal chemistry described so far is the formation of stable, d2 early-metal complexes with available coordination sites. The Group 4 d2 metallocenes have been studied extensively in this regard due to the stability of the metallocene framework toward reductive degradation, but recent interest in “post-metallocene” early-metal catalysts for olefin polymerization and selective bond activation has highlighted the utility of developing alternative ligand frameworks for the Group 4 and Group 5 metals.1525 With this expanded scope of available ligands for early-metal complexes, we were interested in furthering the application of this “post-metallocene” strategy to niobium complexes in the d2 electronic state.2628

Here we describe our efforts toward the investigation of reductive bond formation with the (BDI)Nb(NtBu) system (BDI = HC[C(Me)NAr]2; Ar = 2,6-iPr2-C6H3). Following initial observations of a known reductive ligand degradation pathway,2932 we have found that the use of π-acids leads to (BDI)Nb(III) products that are indefinitely stable at room temperature. The chemistry of the previously reported33 Nb(III) dicarbonyl complex, along with related Nb(III) complexes described below, has been explored with the aim of generating Nb=Y (Y = NR, CR2, O) and C–C bonds.

Results and Discussion

Synthesis of Nb(V) bis(imido) and Nb(IV) mono(imido) complexes

Reduction of (BDI)Nb(NtBu)Cl2(py) with KC8 in the absence of trapping ligands

Initial attempts to isolate a BDI-supported Nb(III) complex proceeded by chemical reduction of the dichloride complex (BDI)Nb(NtBu)Cl2(py), 1. Addition of 2.0 equiv of KC8 in Et2O to a slurry of 1 in Et2O at −72 °C quickly caused the solution to turn from red to dark blue. The consumption of KC8 was checked visually (bronze to black), which indicated that the reaction was complete after 10 min at −72 °C. The color quickly turned dark yellow when this solution was allowed to warm to room temperature. The subsequent removal of solvent and extraction with pentane gave a clear yellow solution from which a bright yellow solid crystallized at −40 °C. A 1H NMR spectrum indicated that the material was diamagnetic and that it lacked the symmetry expected for the proposed Nb(III) species (BDI)Nb(NtBu)(py) (3, Scheme 2). Importantly, only three sets of resonances for the aryl ring iso-propyl groups (in a relative ratio of 1:1:2) were observed, indicating that one of the aryl rings is freely rotating on the NMR timescale while the other is locked in position. An X-ray crystal structure was obtained, revealing a monoazabutadiene (mad) bis(imido) complex (mad)Nb(NtBu)(NAr)(py) (2py, Scheme 2, Figure 1).

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Molecular structure of 2py as determined by a single crystal X-ray diffraction study. The hydrogen atoms and iso-propyl groups were omitted for clarity; the thermal ellipsoids were set at the 50 % probability level. Selected bond lengths(Å): Nb(1)-N(1) 1.803(5), Nb(1)-N(2) 1.821(5), Nb(1)-N(3) 2.340(5), Nb(1)-N(4) 2.279(6), Nb(1)-C(32) 2.213(7), C(31)-C(32) 1.327(8), C(30)-C(31) 1.447(9), N(3)-C(30) 1.267(7). Selected bond angles (°): N(1)-Nb(1)-N(2) 114.96(19), N(1)-Nb(1)-N(3) 116.3(2), N(2)-Nb(1)-N(3) 128.72(17), C(32)-Nb(1)-N(4) 154.00(19), C(1)-N(1)-Nb(1) 161.2(4), C(5)-N(2)-Nb(1) 173.4(4).

The route to this product likely involves reductive cleavage of one of the ligand N–Cimine bonds, in a manner analogous to that proposed by Mindiola,29,30 Stephan,31 and Tokitoh32 from their separate work on Group 4 β-diketiminato complexes. In those cases, reduction of the complexes (BDI)MClx (M = Ti, x = 2; M = Zr, Hf, x = 3) to the MII oxidation state resulted in the formation of (mad)M(NAr)Cl. In related Ti chemistry, Roesky et al. reported that trans-metallation of a LiBDI salt with TiCl3 resulted in the isolation of a (BDI)Ti(IV) imide (among other products), with the imido group originating from a section of a BDI ligand.34

While the ligand degradation pathway prevented isolation of the Nb(III) complex, the formation of a bis(imido) complex is of interest considering both the rarity of this moiety on Group 5 metals and that complex 2py represents the first example of a Group 5 bis(imido) complex with unsymmetrically substituted imido groups. The arylimido ligand has a longer Nb–N bond length (Nb(1)-N(2) 1.821(5) Å) and a shorter N–C distance (N(2)-C(5) 1.386(7) Å) than the alkyl substituted imido group (Nb(1)-N(1) 1.803(5) Å, N(1)-C(1) 1.465(8) Å). This effect is well documented in the literature and can be attributed to N(pπ)−Ar(pπ) bonding, making the Nb(1)-N(2)-C(5) bonding angle (173.4(4)°) more linear than the analogous Nb(1)-N(1)-C(1) bond angle (161.2(4)°). Related Group 6 bis(imido) compounds with one alkylimido and one arylimido group related across a pseudo molecular mirror plane have a similar disparity in imido group bonding.

The bonding within the monoazabutadiene ligand reflects considerable double bond localization, with a short N(3)-C(30) distance (1.267(7) Å), long C(30)-C(31) bond (1.447(9) Å), and short C(31)-C(32) interaction (1.327(8) Å). The Nb–C bond length (Nb(1)-C(32) 2.213(7) Å) is typical for Nb(V)-C single bonds, and the Nb(1)-N(3) bond length (2.340(5) Å) is indicative of a neutral donor, on the order of a Nb-pyridine interaction. With a formally d0 metal center, the metallacycle has a four-electron non-aromatic π-system, consistent with the observed bond localization within the ring.

Reduction of (BDI)Nb(NtBu)Me2 with H2

Reaction of a thawing THF solution of the dimethyl complex (BDI)Nb(NtBu)Me233 4 with dihydrogen (1 atm) immediately caused the color of the solution to change from bright yellow to orange. The product isolated by crystallization was identified as the monoazabutadiene bis(imido) complex (mad)Nb(NtBu)(NAr)(thf) (2thf, Figure 2) formed via the reductive cleavage of the ligand N–Cimine bond. Complex 2thf crystallizes in the same space group as 2py (P212121), and the molecular structure is analogous to that for 2py; the molecular geometry of both structures is best described as pseudo-square pyramidal (τ(2py) = 0.42;τ (2thf)= 0.46). 35

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Left: Proposed reaction scheme leading to 2thf. Right: Molecular structure of 2thf as determined by a single crystal X-ray diffraction study. The hydrogen atoms and iso-propyl groups were omitted for clarity; the thermal ellipsoids were set at the 50 % probability level. Selected bond lengths (Å): Nb(1)-N(1) 1.786(3), Nb(1)-N(2) 1.826(4), Nb(1)-N(3) 2.332(3), Nb(1)-O(1) 2.259(3), Nb(1)-C(18) 2.203(5), N(3)-C(20) 1.294(6), C(19)-C(20) 1.450(7), C(18)-C(19) 1.346(7), N(1)-C(1) 1.465(6), N(2)-C(5) 1.390(6). Selected bond angles (°): N(1)-Nb(1)-N(2) 116.91(18), N(1)-Nb(1)-C(18) 99.2(2), N(2)-Nb(1)-C(18) 91.39(19), N(1)-Nb(1)-O(1) 100.54(17), N(2)-Nb(1)-O(1) 94.06(15), C(18)-Nb(1)-O(1) 154.44(15), N(1)-Nb(1)-N(3) 115.53(15), N(2)-Nb(1)-N(3) 126.94(14), C(18)-Nb(1)-N(3) 72.90(16), O(1)-Nb(1)-N(3) 83.95(13), C(1)-N(1)-Nb(1) 168.5(4), C(5)-N(2)-Nb(1) 176.2(4).

While no intermediates leading to 2thf could be detected by NMR spectroscopy, the isolation of the product suggests the intermediacy of a Nb(III) complex. Hydrogen addition to early-metal alkyls is a well-known method for generating early metal hydrides, but the synthesis of early metal polyhydrides from MRn (n > 1) complexes typically requires high pressures of H2 to give clean conversions.36 This is likely due to the facile reductive elimination of alkane products from R–M–H species, indicating that high pressures of H2 are needed to out-compete C–H reductive elimination. In the present case, the low H2 pressure used in the reaction would presumably yield a transient methyl hydride species (BDI)Nb(NtBu)Me(H)(L) (L = □, thf); reductive elimination of methane from this intermediate would give the Nb(III) complex (BDI)Nb(NtBu)(L), which would be capable of reductive ligand degradation (Figure 2). This hydrogenolysis pathway circumvents a Nb(IV) intermediate, indicating that the proposed Nb(III) complex 3, formed by chemical reduction of the dichloride 1, could be competent for forming 2py.

Unfortunately, we were unable to obtain spectroscopic data on 3 due to the heterogeneity of the mixture throughout the reaction and the thermal instability of the product. Still, we have assigned this Nb(III) intermediate as a pyridine adduct, (BDI)Nb(NtBu)(py) (3, Scheme 2), based on the following points: i) The pyridine-coordinated complexes 7 and 10 (see below) were synthesized directly from solutions of 3, which had been synthesized as described above via KC8 reduction of 1 at −72 °C. ii) No intermediate Nb(III) species could be detected visually or by NMR spectroscopy at −70 °C during the formation of 2thf with THF as the solvent, but the dark blue solution that we have assigned to 3 is stable for ca. 10 min at −72 °C in Et2O, suggesting that the nature and concentration of the neutral donor may have a significant effect on the stability of the intermediate Nb(III) species. iii) A color change from blue to yellow was observed following addition of B(C6F5)3 to a solution of the dark blue intermediate at −72 °C. This color change could be attributed to a change in the metal’s coordination number (and possibly oxidation state) following pyridine abstraction by the borane reagent to form py•B(C6F5)3.37–38

Reduction of (BDI)Nb(NtBu)Cl2(py) with KC8 in the presence of dmpe

Considering the limitations toward exploratory Nb(III)-based reactivity imposed by the thermal instability of 3, we sought to stabilize the Nb(III) complex by introducing suitable neutral donors. Addition of bis(dimethylphosphine)ethane (dmpe) into the slurry of 1 before the addition of KC8 resulted in a new dmpe-containing product following chemical reduction. The color of the solution turned from blue to yellow-green while being maintained at −72 °C. Allowing the flask to warm to room temperature and stirring the mixture for 12 h did not cause the color of the solution to change, and following workup, a product was isolated as yellow-green dichroic crystals from a saturated Et2O solution. A 1H NMR spectrum of the crystallized material revealed paramagnetically shifted and broadened peaks between −5 and 15 ppm. While most d2 Nb systems are known to be diamagnetic, some paramagnetic Nb(III) phosphine complexes are known;39 the crystallographically determined molecular structure of the product, however, was found to be that of a distorted-octahedral Nb(IV) complex (BDI)Nb(NtBu)Cl(dmpe) (5, Scheme 3, Figure 3), resulting from dmpe substitution for pyridine and a one-electron reduction to a Nb(IV) mono-chloride complex.

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Molecular structure of 5 as determined by a single crystal X-ray diffraction study. The hydrogen atoms and iso-propyl groups were omitted for clarity; the thermal ellipsoids were set at the 50 % probability level. Selected bond lengths (Å): Nb(1)-N(1) 1.789(2), Nb(1)-N(2) 2.286(2), Nb(1)-N(3) 2.268(2), Nb(1)-P(1) 2.6839(8), Nb(1)-P(2) 2.6757(8), Nb(1)-Cl(1) 2.5802(7), N(2)-C(24) 1.332(4), C(24)-C(25) 1.404(4), C(25)-C(26) 1.396(4), N(3)-C(26) 1.338(3). Selected bond angles (°): N(1)-Nb(1)-N(3) 99.09(9), N(1)-Nb(1)-N(2) 98.81(9), N(3)-Nb(1)-N(2) 84.15(8), N(1)-Nb(1)-Cl(1) 167.68(7), N(3)-Nb(1)-Cl(1) 87.78(6), N(2)-Nb(1)-Cl(1) 92.03(6), N(1)-Nb(1)-P(2) 96.83(8), N(3)-Nb(1)-P(2) 163.81(6), N(2)-Nb(1)-P(2) 96.35(6), Cl(1)-Nb(1)-P(2) 76.04(3), N(1)-Nb(1)-P(1) 94.59(7), N(3)-Nb(1)-P(1) 100.21(6), N(2)-Nb(1)-P(1) 165.10(6), Cl(1)-Nb(1)-P(1) 74.02(3), P(2)-Nb(1)-P(1) 75.49(2), C(1)-N(1)-Nb(1) 176.5(2).

The stability of 5 in the presence of excess KC8 was unexpected. Compound 5 can be synthesized in yields similar to those observed in the procedure given above using 1.0 equiv of KC8, and reducing 1 with 2.0 equiv of Na/Hg amalgam (0.5% by weight) in the presence of dmpe results only in the isolation of 2py. Since we had previously reduced 1 to a Nb(III) complex using 2 equiv of KC8, it seems that phosphine coordination may be significantly affecting the reduction potential of the Nb(IV) complex. Attempts at forming related Nb(IV) complexes with monodentate phosphines (PMe3, PMe2Ph, PMePh2, PPh3) in the presence of two equivalents of KC8 resulted only in the formation of 2py. When one equivalent of KC8 was used to reduce 1 in the presence of the monodentate phosphines, mixtures of 1 and 2py were recovered.

Investigation of the electronic structure of 5 by EPR spectroscopy confirmed that the complex is a spin doublet with the unpaired electron localized largely on the Nb nucleus. The 298 K X-band (9.251 GHz) EPR spectrum of 5 in benzene revealed a decet of triplets corresponding to a niobium-centered radical coupling to two equivalent phosphorus nuclei; no superhyperfine coupling to either the nitrogen or chlorine centers could be discerned. Unexpectedly, the 34.326 GHz (Q-band) spectrum gave better line-width resolution; this higher field spectrum was thus used for modeling the spectral parameters, revealing giso = 1.9815 (Figure 4, bottom), with a strong 120.5×10−4 cm−1 hyperfine coupling to niobium (93Nb, 100 %, I = 9/2) and a weaker 31.0×10−4 cm−1 superhyperfine coupling to the two equivalent phosphorus nuclei (31P, 100 %, I = 1/2).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Top: X-band EPR spectrum of 5. Bottom: Simulated and experimental Q-band EPR spectra of 5. Both experimental spectra were recorded at 298 K.

Forming stable Nb(III) complexes via π-acid coordination

Since the presence of phosphines were not found to yield stable Nb(III) adducts of 3, we were interested in investigating whether the Nb(III) intermediate could be trapped with alternative neutral donors. As has been reported previously, the dicarbonyl compound (BDI)Nb(NtBu)(CO)2 9 can be prepared in moderate yields from carbonylation of the dimethyl complex, (BDI)Nb(NtBu)Me2 4.33 The stability of the Nb(III) dicarbonyl compared to 3 indicated that strong π-acids may be necessary for stabilizing a d2 (BDI)Nb species. A full discussion of the synthesis and characterization of 9 will be given below, following the results of treating 3 with XylNC and CO.

Formation of a Nb(III) isocyanide complex

The addition of 3.0 equiv of solid XylNC (Xyl = 2,6-Me2-C6H3) to a solution of 3 at −72 °C (generated from the treatment of 1 with two equivalents of KC8 at −72 °C) resulted in a rapid color change from dark blue to dark red. Removing the cold bath and allowing the flask to warm to room temperature caused the solution to take on a blue-green color. The product (BDI)Nb(NtBu)(CNXyl)3 (6, Scheme 4) was isolated as dark blue-purple dichroic crystals from a saturated Et2O solution cooled to −40 °C. Attempts at isolating the intermediate dark-red product by using sub-stoichiometric amounts of XylNC were unsuccessful, resulting only in isolation of 6. Still, while we lack any explicit knowledge of the identity of the intermediate, our synthesis of the dark-red, pyridine-coordinated dicarbonyl species (BDI)Nb(NtBu)(CO)2(py) (see below) would suggest that the intermediate in this reaction is the six-coordinate species (BDI)Nb(NtBu)(CNXyl)2(py). The better σ-donor capability of XylNC over CO could account for the more facile pyridine loss when compared to the isolable pyridine adduct of the dicarbonyl complex. This dissociative process could then generate a transient five-coordinate bis(isocyanide) species, analogous to the isolable five-coordinate dicarbonyl complex (BDI)Nb(NtBu)(CO)2 (see below). Coordination of a third XylNC to this species would lead to the formation of 6.

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4

The crystal structure of 6 (Figure 5) revealed that the isocyanides are meridonally distributed around the Nb atom, consistent with the tBu resonance in the 1H NMR spectrum being shifted upfield due to its proximity to the flanking aryl ring of the BDI ligand. The Nb–C bond lengths (Nb(1)-C(1) 2.216(3) Å, Nb(1)-C(2) 2.183(2) Å, Nb(1)-C(3) 2.203(2) Å) are in the range expected for Nb–C single bonds. This relatively short distance for a neutral donor is a result of the Nb-based back-bonding into the isocyanide π* orbitals.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Molecular structure of 6 as determined by a single crystal X-ray diffraction study. The hydrogen atoms and the N(5) and N(6) aryl groups were omitted for clarity; the thermal ellipsoids were set at the 50 % probability level. Selected bond lengths (Å): Nb(1)-C(1) 2.216(3), Nb(1)-C(2) 2.183(2), Nb(1)-C(3) 2.203(3), Nb(1)-N(4) 1.797(2), Nb(1)-N(5) 2.2707(18), Nb(1)-N(6) 2.326(2), C(1)-N(1) 1.173(3), C(2)-N(2) 1.165(3), C(3)-N(3) 1.163(3), N(5)-C(45) 1.318(3), C(45)-C(46) 1.406(4), C(46)-C(47) 1.403(4), N(6)-C(47) 1.332(3). Selected bond angles (°): N(1)-C(1)-Nb(1) 178.2(2), N(2)-C(2)-Nb(1) 169.6(2), N(3)-C(3)-Nb(1) 177.5(2), C(28)-N(4)-Nb(1) 173.21(18), C(3)-Nb(1)-C(1) 175.83(8), C(2)-Nb(1)-N(5) 171.74(8), N(4)-Nb(1)-N(6) 171.30(8).

The differences between the bonding within the mutually trans isocyanides and the isocyanide trans to the BDI nitrogen match the trend observed by Royo and coworkers with the analogous Nb(III) complex Cp*NbCl2(CNXyl)3 (Cp* = C5Me5).40 The latter complex has a distorted octahedral geometry with meridonally substituted isocyanide ligands and a 1σ, 2π ligand (Cp*) located cis to all three isocyanides. The two chlorides are σ-donors analogous to the BDI ligand nitrogens in 6. In the present case, we observe two longer Nb–C bond lengths (2.216(3) Å, 2.203(2) Å) for the mutually trans isocyanides compared to the shorter Nb(1)–C(2) distance (2.183(2) Å). A similar trend is observed by Royo, wherein the mutually trans isocyanides have notably longer Nb-C bond lengths than the isocyanide situated cis to each of them. The Nb-C-N bond angle for the isocyanide ligand trans to a chloride in Cp*NbCl2(CNXyl)3 is also more acute than those for the mutually trans isocyanides, which Royo attributes to weakening of the trans-to-chloride C-N bond relative to the other two isocyanides. Compound 6 exhibits a similar contraction of the Nb(1)-C(2)-N(2) bond angle (169.6(2)°) compared to that in the mutually trans isocyanides (Nb(1)-C(1)-N(1) 178.2(2)°, Nb(1)-C(3)-N(3) 177.5(2)°), although not to the degree observed by Royo. In contrast to the Royo complex, the isocyanide C–N bond distances for 6 (C(1)-N(1) 1.173(3) Å, C(2)-N(2) 1.165(3) Å, C(3)-N(3) 1.163(3) Å) do not vary significantly relative to the position of the isocyanide carbon about the metal center.

An IR spectrum of 6 revealed only two isocyanide N–C stretching frequencies (νCN = 2011, 1986 cm−1) despite the averaged Cs symmetry observed in solution by NMR spectroscopy and the pseudo-Cs symmetry observed in the solid state. Several factors could lead to this apparent discrepancy, such as insufficient resolution of the instrument, low intensity of one of the signals, or coincidence of two of the IR-active modes. In the related work by Royo and co-workers only two isocyanide stretches were observed for Cp*NbCl2(CNXyl)3 despite the three predicted by group theory for complexes of this symmetry (Cs) with three meridonally arranged C≡X ligands (X = O, NR).

Synthesis of stable Nb(III) dicarbonyl complexes

Carbon monoxide also reacted readily with 3 at −72 °C, yielding the dark-red pyridine-coordinated dicarbonyl complex (BDI)Nb(NtBu)(CO)2(py) (7, Scheme 5). The room temperature 1H NMR spectrum of the product is broadened due to reversible pyridine dissociation in solution (ΔG = 15.1(2) kcal/mol). This observation is supported by the change from an average C1 symmetric complex observed at 253 K to a complex with average C2v symmetry at 343 K; the high temperature spectrum begins to approximate that of 9 and free pyridine. The pyridine ligand readily exchanges with added pyridine-d5 at room temperature to yield 7-D5 and free C5H5N, and the CO groups are also exchanged by allowing a solution of 7 to stand under an atmosphere of 13CO. Isotope enrichment was needed for identification of the broad CO carbon resonances in the 13C{1H} NMR spectrum (250.2 and 243.6 ppm). The natural abundance CO stretching frequencies for 7 (νCO = 1954, 1863) are lower in magnitude by ca. 30 cm−1 than those for 9 (νCO = 1988, 1893), consistent with 7 possessing a more electron-rich metal center.

Scheme 5.

Scheme 5

An X-ray crystal structure of the product (Figure 6) supported the proposed C1 symmetry observed in solution. The complex is pseudo-octahedral with the imido group located centrally above one of the flanking aryl rings. The Nb=NtBu bond length (1.806(2) Å) is one of the longest known (alkylimido)niobium bond distances, being on the order of niobium arylimido bonding interactions which are lengthened due to resonance stabilization from the imido nitrogen into the aryl ring. The long metal-imido bond length for 7 may be attributed to the presence of metal-centered π-electrons that occupy orbitals of the same symmetry as those containing the nitrogen-based pπ electrons. This metal-based approach to π-loading therefore draws an analogy to other π-loaded Nb(V) systems. The longest known Nb=NR (R = alkyl) bond distance in the literature is that of the niobocene imido cation [(Me3SiC5H4)2Nb(NtBu)(CNtBu)][BPh4] which, despite the cationic charge at the metal center, has a long Nb=NtBu distance (1.796(2) Å) due to the ligation of three 1σ,2π ligands.41 Similarly, our recently reported bis(imido) niobium complexes bearing the BDI ligand (BDI)Nb(NtBu)2(Lpy) (8, Lpy = pyridine, 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine, Figure 7) exhibit long Nb=NtBu bond lengths (1.795(3)–1.809(2) Å) consistent with the π-loading effect resulting from the introduction of multiple imido groups.38

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Molecular structure of 7 as determined by a single crystal X-ray diffraction study. The hydrogen atoms were omitted for clarity; the thermal ellipsoids were set at the 50 % probability level. Selected bond lengths (Å): Nb(1)-C(1) 2.095(3), Nb(1)-C(2) 2.103(3), Nb(1)-N(1) 1.806(2), Nb(1)-N(2) 2.246(2), Nb(1)-N(3) 2.308(2), Nb(1)-N(4) 2.350(2), C(1)-O(1) 1.152(3), C(2)-O(2) 1.147(3), N(2)-C(20) 1.330(3), C(20)-C(21) 1.387(4), C(21)-C(22) 1.400(4), N(3)-C(22) 1.336(6). Selected bond angles (°): C(2)-Nb(1)-N(2) 167.96(10), N(1)-Nb(1)-N(3) 169.43(9), C(1)-Nb(1)-N(4) 173.24(10), O(1)-C(1)-Nb(1) 169.9(2), O(2)-C(2)-Nb(1) 172.6(3), C(3)-N(1)-Nb(1) 169.3(2).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Diagram of (BDI)Nb(NtBu)2Lpy (8).

The crystal structure of 7 also reveals that the two carbonyl ligands are located cis to one another, with the more proximal (to the metal) carbonyl ligand (Nb(1)-C(1) 2.095(3) Å) found trans to the pyridine and the more distal carbonyl (Nb(1)-C(2) 2.103(3) Å) trans to one of the BDI nitrogens. The difference between the two Nb–C bond lengths is only marginally statistically significant. This trend is reflected in the similarity between the two C–O bond lengths, which are found to be identical within experimental error. The implication from this similarity is that the BDI ligand is not π-bonding significantly with the metal center, since the pyridine ligand should be a weak π-donor.

Next, we were interested in finding an efficient route to the pyridine-free complex 9 for the purposes of exploring Nb(III)-based reaction chemistry. The direct synthesis of 9 from the reaction of 4 with CO gave only modest yields (ca. 40%) of the dicarbonyl.33 From related chemistry with the bis(imido) compounds 8, it was found that the highly electrophilic borane reagent B(C6F5)3 can be used to extract pyridine to form a separable py•B(C6F5)3 complex.38 With the dicarbonyl 7, B(C6F5)3 does preferentially bind pyridine in benzene solution (Scheme 6), but separation of py•B(C6F5)3 from 9 is tedious and the reaction requires large amounts of the borane reagent. Another impractical but interesting method for forming 9 was found on reacting 7 with [Cp2Fe][B(3,5-(CF3)2-C6H3)4] in benzene (Scheme 6). Upon mixing of the reagents, the color of the solution lightened from dark red to orange-green over ca. 30 min as the sparingly soluble ferrocenium reagent was consumed with commensurate precipitation of a black solid. 1H NMR analysis of the reaction mixture indicated that 9 had formed cleanly, along with one equivalent of ferrocene. Neither the mechanism of this reaction nor the identity of the insoluble solid are known at this time. Attempts at performing this reaction with other ferrocenium salts ([Cp2Fe][OTf], [Cp2Fe][PF6]) failed to give clean reactions, and reaction of the ferrocenium borate salt with the pyridine-coordinated dichloride 1 also failed to give the product of pyridine abstraction.

Scheme 6.

Scheme 6

Our preferred method for forming 9 involved initial formation of the ketimine complex (BDI)Nb(NtBu)(η2-tBuNCMe2). We have shown previously that displacement of a coordinated ketimine ligand by CO to yield the dicarbonyl complex proceeded cleanly under mild conditions.33 Accordingly, starting from 1, methylation, isocyanide insertion, and ketimine displacement with CO could be performed in one pot to give the dicarbonyl 9 in 70% yield based on the dichloride (Scheme 7). The product crystallized as large yellow-green dichroic blocks from hexane and exhibited analytical data identical to those obtained by direct carbonylation of 4.

Scheme 7.

Scheme 7

The room temperature NMR spectra of 9 are surprising in that they indicate average molecular C2v symmetry in solution; low-temperature NMR experiments indicate a lowering of symmetry, but the peaks were still broad at the temperature limit of the instrument (193 K). The crystallographically-determined molecular geometry of 9 is square pyramidal with an apical carbonyl ligand (Figure 8). The asymmetric unit of the unit cell contains two independent molecules of 9 with essentially identical metric parameters, indicating that the low symmetry of the solid state geometry is not due to crystal packing forces. The crystallographic data suggest that the high symmetry observed in solution is the result of rapid intramolecular rearrangement processes. Bridging CO ligands could also account for the high observed symmetry, but the solution-state IR spectrum of 9 (νCO = 1988, 1893) suggests that both CO ligands are terminally bound to the metal on the IR time-scale.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Molecular structure of one of the two crystallographically independent molecules in the asymmetric unit of 9 as determined by a single crystal X-ray diffraction study.33 The hydrogen atoms were omitted for clarity; the thermal ellipsoids were set at the 50 % probability level. Selected bond lengths (Å): Nb(1)-C(1) 2.057(5), Nb(1)-C(2) 2.122(5), Nb(1)-N(1) 1.792(3), Nb(1)-N(2) 2.191(3), Nb(1)-N(3) 2.223(3), C(1)-O(1) 1.143(5), C(2)-O(2) 1.143(5), N(2)-C(20) 1.343(5), C(20)-C(21) 1.399(6), C(21)-C(22) 1.381(6), N(3)-C(22) 1.346(5). Selected bond angles (°): N(1)-Nb(1)-C(1) 88.53(17), N(1)-Nb(1)-C(2) 81.13(16), C(1)-Nb(1)-C(2) 83.77(18), N(1)-Nb(1)-N(2) 106.08(14), C(1)-Nb(1)-N(2) 108.72(16), C(2)-Nb(1)-N(2) 165.41(15), N(1)-Nb(1)-N(3) 156.02(14), C(1)-Nb(1)-N(3) 110.10(15), C(2)-Nb(1)-N(3) 85.91(15), N(2)-Nb(1)-N(3) 82.73(13), C(3)-N(1)-Nb(1) 170.2(3), O(1)-C(1)-Nb(1) 177.3(4), O(2)-C(2)-Nb(1) 172.3(4).

The X-ray crystal structure of 9 reveals long Nb=NtBu bond distances (Nb(1)-N(1) 1.792(3), Nb(2)-N(4) 1.794(4)), which are shorter than those for the pyridine coordinated dicarbonyl but longer than most other (alkylimido)niobium complexes. The structures are distorted slightly from that of an idealized square pyramidal geometry (τNb(1) = 0.16, τNb(2) = 0.11), and, without a trans ligand, the apical CO ligands lie closer to the metal center (Nb(1)-C(1) 2.057(5) Å, Nb(2)-C(36) 2.063(6) Å) than the corresponding CO ligand of 7.

In all three compounds 6, 7, and 9, the Nb–NBDI bond lengths change only slightly with their relative orientation to the imido group and this asymmetry does not lead to bond alternation within the BDI NCCCN ligand backbone as has been observed for related d0 compounds.38 A similar effect was observed for the bis(imido) compounds 8, indicating that the metal-based π-symmetry orbitals involved in bonding with the BDI π-system are occupied in the d2 compounds 6, 7, and 9, just as they would be for π-loaded bis(imido) compounds. The difference in Nb–NBDI bond distances is a result of σ-based trans-influences of the imido ligand compared to the CO or isocyanide ligands.

Formation of Nb=Y (Y = NMes, O, C(Me)OLi) bonds by reactions with Nb(III) compounds

Oxidation of (BDI)Nb(NtBu)(py) with MesN3

While 3 could only be generated in situ, we were interested in the possibility of utilizing the Nb(III) complex as a precursor for the selective introduction of a second imido group. Addition of mesityl azide to a stirred slurry of 3 at −72 °C resulted in an immediate color change from blue to dark orange, producing the bis(imido) complex (BDI)Nb(NtBu)(NMes)(py) (10, Scheme 8, Mes = 2,4,6-Me3-C6H2), which was isolated in 46% yield after crystallization from pentane. Notably, the solution effervesced rapidly upon azide addition, and the color of the solution did not change appreciably after gas evolution ceased. These observations indicate that formation of the 10 was rapid at low temperature. By contrast, tBuN3 failed to react competitively with ligand degradation.

Scheme 8.

Scheme 8

The crystal structure of 10 (Figure 9) indicates features similar to those of the bis(tBu-imido) complexes discussed previously (compounds 8, Figure 7), with the exception that the geometry at the metal center can now more accurately be described as pseudo-trigonal bipyramidal (τ = 0.58). The shift in geometry from compounds 8 likely reflects a relaxation of steric constraints on changing to the planar arylimido group, since a trigonal bipyramidal geometry with two equatorial imido groups has been predicted to be the most stable conformation for MT2Ln3 complexes (M = transition metal, T = potentially triply-bonded ligand, Ln = σ-bonding ligand).42 This preferred geometry for bis(imido) complexes can be compared to the well-known stability of the bent metallocene systems, in that a trigonal bipyramidal L3M(NR)2 structure with equatorial imido groups would be isolobal to a bent metallocene system with three ligands lying in the plane bisecting the Ct-M-Ct angle (Ct = cyclpentadienyl ring centroid). The frontier orbitals for such bis(imido) complexes have been found by computational studies to match those of the bent metallocene fragment,43 with the three unoccupied frontier orbitals (two with a1 symmetry, one with b2 symmetry) lying in the plane bisecting the Nimido-M-Nimido angle. An important finding from these calculations is that the frontier orbitals of bent bis(imido) complexes lack any unoccupied, out-of-plane orbitals to participate in π-bonding with the ligands bound to the metallocene-like wedge (in direct analogy with the metallocene systems), thus explaining why the bonding within the BDI NCCCN plane is relatively unperturbed despite the substantially different trans-influences of the ligands trans to the BDI nitrogens. The π-electrons from the metallacycle are localized within the NCCCN portion of the molecule, whereas vacant π-symmetry metal-based orbitals are available for bonding in complexes such as 1 and 4. The preference of MT2L3 complexes for a trigonal bipyramidal geometry with equatorial imido groups (T ligands) is further supported by the molecular geometry of complexes 2s (s = py, thf), which only appear to deviate from an idealized trigonal bipyramidal structure as a result of the constrained geometry of the five-membered niobacycle.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Molecular structure of 10 as determined by a single crystal X-ray diffraction study. The hydrogen atoms and iso-propyl groups were omitted for clarity; the thermal ellipsoids were set at the 50 % probability level. Selected bond lengths (Å): Nb(1)-N(1) 1.791(3), Nb(1)-N(2) 1.816(3), Nb(1)-N(3) 2.209(3), Nb(1)-N(4) 2.289(3), Nb(1)-N(5) 2.316(3), N(3)-C(27) 1.326(5), C(27)-C(28) 1.402(5), C(28)-C(29) 1.392(5), N(4)-C(29) 1.331(5). Selected bond angles (°): N(1)-Nb(1)-N(2) 115.64(15), N(1)-Nb(1)-N(3) 98.22(13), N(2)-Nb(1)-N(3) 99.75(12), N(1)-Nb(1)-N(4) 129.35(13), N(2)-Nb(1)-N(4) 114.11(13), N(3)-Nb(1)-N(4) 82.19(12), N(1)-Nb(1)-N(5) 84.84(12), N(2)-Nb(1)-N(5) 92.58(13), N(3)-Nb(1)-N(5) 164.39(12), N(4)-Nb(1)-N(5) 84.06(11), C(1)-N(1)-Nb(1) 165.4(3), C(5)-N(2)-Nb(1) 174.1(3).

Oxidation of (BDI)Nb(NtBu)(CO)2 with Ph2SO

With an interest in forming a terminal Nb=O bond, we sought oxidation of 9 with Ph2SO. The reaction of 9 with 1.0 equiv of Ph2SO in benzene initially formed a dark green solution from the light green color of the starting material. This initial reaction was followed by a continual effervescence over 1 h at room temperature as the color turned yellow; near the end of the reaction, a crystalline material precipitated from solution. Monitoring the reaction by 1H NMR spectroscopy indicated that two products formed initially, which were cleanly converted into a single product with averaged Cs symmetry at the end of the reaction; the relationship between this final species and that of the material that precipitated from solution is currently unknown. The precipitated material was found to be highly insoluble in common solvents, and elemental analysis indicated that the product did not contain sulfur.

An X-ray crystal structure of the product revealed it to be the bis(μ-oxo)-bridged dimer [(BDI)Nb(NtBu)]2(μ2-O)2 (11, Scheme 9, Figure 10), presumably resulting from reductive S=O bond cleavage to give a terminal Nb=O, which dimerized in solution to yield insoluble 11. Attempts at monitoring the course of the reaction by in situ solution IR spectroscopy of the reaction mixture failed to give evidence for a measurable concentration of the terminal oxo in solution, indicating that the two products observed by 1H NMR may be two diastereomers of Ph2SO coordination. The mechanism of dialkylsulfoxide reduction by various molybdenum and tungsten complexes in d2 oxidation states has been studied extensively in the context of modeling the active site of dimethylsulfoxide reductase. Mechanistic studies on these systems have indicated that the O-bound species is the only intermediate on the reaction pathway.44

Scheme 9.

Scheme 9

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Molecular structure of 11 as determined by a single crystal X-ray diffraction study. The hydrogen atoms and the N(2), N(2)*, N(3), and N(3)* aryl groups were omitted for clarity (* denotes atomic position determined by crystallographic inversion center); the thermal ellipsoids were set at the 50 % probability level. Selected bond lengths (Å): Nb(1)-O(1) 1.967(2), Nb(1)-O(1)* 1.961(2), Nb(1)-N(1) 1.764(3), Nb(1)-N(2) 2.227(3), Nb(1)-N(3) 2.218(3), N(2)-C(21) 1.337(4), C(21)-C(22) 1.393(5), C(22)-C(23) 1.389(5), N(3)-C(23) 1.345(5). Selected bond angles (°): N(1)-Nb(1)-O(1)* 112.47(11), N(1)-Nb(1)-O(1) 112.35(11), O(1)*-Nb(1)-O(1) 79.84(10), N(1)-Nb(1)-N(3) 97.52(12), O(1)*-Nb(1)-N(3) 90.95(10), O(1)-Nb(1)-N(3) 150.06(11), N(1)-Nb(1)-N(2) 98.30(12), O(1)*-Nb(1)-N(2) 149.17(10), O(1)-Nb(1)-N(2) 90.47(10), N(3)-Nb(1)-N(2) 82.99(10), Nb(1)*-O(1)-Nb(1) 100.16(10), C(1)-N(1)-Nb(1) 179.1(3).

In the X-ray crystal structure of 11 the molecule sits on a crystallographic inversion center which defines the Nb2O2 diamond-shaped core. The Nb–O bond distances are symmetrically distributed (Nb(1)-O(1) 1.967(2) Å, Nb(1)-O(1)* 1.961(2) Å) and of normal magnitudes for Nb oxo-bridged dimers. The Nb–O distances match those for terminal Nb–OR bond lengths,45 indicating that the oxo bridge is acting as a normal alkoxide donor to each metal center. The O–O distance (2.521 Å) places the oxygen atoms well outside the covalent radii of one another (rc(O) = 0.66(2) Å), but the Nb–Nb distance (3.0128(6) Å) is inside the sum of the covalent radii of the metals (rc(Nb) = 1.64(6) Å).46 Still, the regularity in the bonding between the metal center and the N/O ligands as well as the regularity of the bond lengths within the ligand backbone indicate that the complex is best described as formally carrying two d0 metal centers, indicating that the close proximity of the metals is a result of the geometric constraints of the oxide bridges (Nb(1)-O(1)-Nb(1)* 100.16(10)°), not a Nb–Nb bonding interaction.

Reaction of (BDI)Nb(NtBu)(CO)2(py) with MeLi

Treatment of the Nb(III) carbonyl complexes with trimethylsilyldiazomethane, a carbon-based oxidant conceptually related to the [RN] and [O] transfer reagents used for the synthesis of complexes 10 and 11, failed to give tractable mixtures of products. We were thus interested in forming a Group 5 carbene in which the reducing capability of the metal would still lead to significant Nb-C double-bond character. Group 6 and later transition metal carbonyls are well-known to undergo addition of nucleophiles at the electrophilic, metal-bound carbonyl carbon. The initial addition forms an acylate, analogous to an organic enolate, which can be quenched at the oxygen with electrophiles (e.g. Me+, Me3Si+, etc.) to yield neutral Fischer carbenes.47 Considering that the seminal work on transition metal carbenes employed Group 6 metals, it is surprising that only a handful of structurally authenticated Group 5 Fischer-type carbenes are known.4852

The pyridine adduct of the dicarbonyl species readily adds MeLi to form the dimeric acylate complex [(BDI)Nb(NtBu)(C(Me)OLi)(CO)]2 (12, Scheme 10) in good yields. The reaction occurred immediately in Et2O and was accompanied by a color change from dark red to red-orange, followed by precipitation of the product as a red solid after a few minutes at room temperature. The isolated product exhibits a single IR stretch in the range from 2200 to 1600 cm−1, corresponding to the terminal carbonyl group (νCO = 1951 cm−1), but the limited solubility of 12 in non-coordinating solvents (pentane, Et2O, C6H6, toluene, chlorobenzene, CH2Cl2) and its observed reactivity with donor solvents (THF, py) hampered characterization of the product in solution. Nonetheless, a 1H NMR spectrum of 12 obtained in chlorobenzene (10% C6D6) indicated the presence of two isomers in solution. On addition of either THF or pyridine, the sets of resonances for the two isomers collapsed into those characteristic of a single product. The products resulting from the addition of donor solvents were thermally unstable in solution, decomposing into multiple products over ca. 30 min at room temperature.

Scheme 10.

Scheme 10

The solid-state structure of 12 was determined by X-ray crystallography on a crystalline sample obtained from cooling a concentrated CH2Cl2 solution. The data obtained from this measurement demonstrated the dimeric molecular structure of 12, resulting from a Li2O2 diamond-shaped core situated on a crystallographic inversion center (Figure 11). Interestingly, the Li atoms are also coordinated to the imido nitrogen, forming a highly distorted, but planar, 5-membered niobacycle. The N(1)-Li(1) interaction causes a lengthening of the Nb(1)-N(1) distance from 1.793 Å (avg.) for 9 to 1.830(3) Å for 12, a range similar to that of an aryl-substituted imido ligand, which is consistent with a weakening of one of N(pπ)–Nb(dπ) bonding interactions and an increased coordination number at the nitrogen. The Li(1)-N(1)* (2.092(9) Å) and Li(1)-O(1)* (1.871(9) Å) distances are within the ranges of known Li–O/N interactions, but the Li(1)-O(1) distance (1.790(9) Å) is short, falling within the shortest 5% of structurally characterized Li–O bonds. The geometry of the metal centers is square pyramidal (τ = 0.29), with the lithiooxaazaniobacycle bridging between apical (acylate) and basal (imido) coordination sites. The Nb(1)-C(3) bond (2.143(5) Å) is longer than for the Nb-Cbasal bond lengths of 9, despite the presumably weaker π-accepting acylate ligand compared to the terminal carbonyl of 9. Also, despite the expected trans effect of the imido group on the trans Nb–NBDI bond length, the Li coordination to the nitrogen appears to attenuate this effect, as the Nb–N bond trans to the imido is only 0.023 Å further from the metal than the BDI nitrogen trans to the carbonyl.

Figure 11.

Figure 11

Molecular structure of 12 as determined by a single crystal X-ray diffraction study. The hydrogen atoms and the N(2), N(2)*, N(3), and N(3)* aryl groups were omitted for clarity (* denotes atomic position determined by crystallographic inversion center); the thermal ellipsoids were set at the 50 % probability level. Selected bond lengths (Å): Nb(1)-C(1) 2.059(4), Nb(1)-C(3) 2.143(5), Nb(1)-N(1) 1.830(3), Nb(1)-N(2) 2.235(3), Nb(1)-N(3) 2.212(3), C(1)-C(2) 1.523(6), C(1)-O(1) 1.307(5), O(1)-Li(1) 1.790(9), O(1)-Li(1)* 1.871(9), N(1)-Li(1)* 2.092(9), O(2)-C(3) 1.139(5), N(2)-C(21) 1.345(5), C(21)-C(22) 1.389(6), C(22)-C(23) 1.416(6), N(3)-C(23) 1.330(5). Selected bond angles (°): N(1)-Nb(1)-C(1) 100.05(16), N(1)-Nb(1)-C(3) 83.33(16), C(1)-Nb(1)-C(3) 87.05(17), N(1)-Nb(1)-N(3) 105.11(14), C(1)-Nb(1)-N(3) 100.11(15), C(3)-Nb(1)-N(3) 167.61(14), N(1)-Nb(1)-N(2) 150.24(14), C(1)-Nb(1)-N(2) 106.42(15), C(3)-Nb(1)-N(2) 84.66(15), N(3)-Nb(1)-N(2) 83.62(12), C(1)-O(1)-Li(1) 174.2(4), C(1)-O(1)-Li(1)* 96.7(4), O(1)-Li(1)*-N(1) 115.1(4), O(1)-C(1)-Nb(1) 131.1(3), Nb(1)-N(1)-Li(1)* 95.9(3), O(2)-C(3)-Nb(1) 173.0(4), C(4)-N(1)-Nb(1) 163.1(2).

The bonding within the acyl group indicates significant multiple bond character between the metal and the acyl carbon. The Nb(1)-C(1) bond (2.059(4) Å) is shortened considerably from the Nb–C σ-bonds of the dimethyl complex (2.1776(17), 2.1874(17) Å), and the long C(1)–O(1) bond distance (1.307(5) Å) is consistent with enolate-type bonding within the acylate group (Figure 12). In accord with the greater electron density at the niobium-bound carbon than for related d0 acyls, compound 12 does not add trialkylphosphines to form phosphine trapped acyls. In the one literature account of a structurally-authenticated, Fischer-type carbene complex of Nb, the cyclic dithiocarbene complex Cp2Nb[=C{SC(CF3)}2][C(CF3)=CH(CF3)],51 a similar Nb-C bond length (2.06(4) Å) is observed. While several formalisms could be invoked to describe the Nb–Cacylate interaction, we find it instructive to consider that the energy of the carbonyl π* orbital not involved in MeLi addition should remain relatively unchanged following MeLi addition, indicating that a back-bonding/Nb(III) model provides a better rational for the short Nb–C distance than either a ligand radical/Nb(IV) or alkylidene/Nb(V) model. Furthermore, the interaction of the acylate oxygen with two lithium cations should serve to remove considerable electron density from the acylate C–O π-system, similar to the effects of electrophile addition during a traditional Fischer carbene synthesis.

Figure 12.

Figure 12

Possible resonance structures for compound 12, illustrating the contribution of Nb-based backbonding into the acylate π*-system.

Stoichiometric reduction of unsaturated organic substrates with (BDI)Nb(NtBu)(CO)2

Reduction of 4,4′-dichlorobenzophenone

An initial investigation into C–C bond forming reactions promoted by the Nb(III) dicarbonyl complex led to the observation of a pinacol coupling product on reaction with a ketone. Addition of 4,4′-dichlorobenzophenone to 9 resulted in a rapid reaction, concurrent with CO release and a color change from green to yellow, to give the pinacol coupling product (BDI)Nb(NtBu)(O2C2ArCl4) (13, Scheme 11, ArCl = 4-chlorophenyl) in quantitative yield. The product exhibits average Cs symmetry in solution by 1H NMR spectroscopy, along with a downfield shifted tBu group. These data are consistent with a square pyramidal complex that places the imido group in the apical position. A new 13C{1H} NMR resonance was observed at 107.5 ppm, consistent with an aliphatic alkoxide carbon bound by electron withdrawing groups.

Scheme 11.

Scheme 11

Introducing 1.0 equiv of the ketone to a solution of 9 resulted in a 1: 1 mixture of 9 and 13, indicating either that ketone coordination to form a 1: 1 adduct is reversible or that incorporation of the second equivalent of ketone is much faster than ketone coordination to 9. The reaction can be considered to occur via one of two likely mechanistic pathways. The first involves initial metallaoxirane formation (formally a 2e oxidative process) followed by coordination and insertion of a second equivalent of ketone into the initially formed Nb–C bond (Scheme 12, Mechanism A). This reaction is reminiscent of Pedersen’s Nb(III)-mediated aminoalcohol synthesis,53 wherein an isolated Nb–aldimine complex readily reacts with aldehydes and ketones to form 2-aminoalcohols in high yields.

Scheme 12.

Scheme 12

Pinacol coupling could also occur by a radical mechanism in which a 1e reduction of the ketone would produce an initial metal-bound ketyl radical (Scheme 12, Mechanism B).54 Several reports of the isolation of stable, metal-bound ketyl complexes have appeared in the literature.5559 Of particular relevance here is the work of Wolczanski and coworkers who found that 1e reduction of di-tert-butyl ketone by the TiIII tris(siloxide) complex Ti(OSitBu3)3 led to a ketyl-TiIV species capable of thermal dissociation of the neutral ketone to regenerate Ti(OSitBu3)3.60 The possibility of reversible ketone binding to 9 could account for the observed 1: 1 mixture of 9 and 13 when only 1.0 equiv of ketone was added to 9. In the presence of a second equivalent of ketone, the Nb(IV)-ketyl complex could then proceed through a number of possible intra- or intermolecular reactions to arrive at the Nb(V)-pinacolate product; one example is given in Scheme 12 for illustrative purposes. Further work in this area will be directed toward elucidating the mechanism of formation of the pinacol coupling product, including investigations into the effects different ketone substituents have on the observed reactivity and on the detectability of transient radical-containing species.

Reaction of (BDI)Nb(NtBu)(CO)2 with PhC≡CMe

Addition of the internal alkyne PhC≡CMe to solutions of 9 in benzene immediately caused the solution to turn yellow, which was accompanied by effervescence throughout the color change. The product was identified as the metallacyclopropene/alkyne complex (BDI)Nb(NtBu)(η2-MeCCPh)(CO) (14, Scheme 13), which formed cleanly and quantitatively as judged by NMR spectroscopy but was unstable in solution, decomposing into multiple unidentified species after several hours at room temperature.

Scheme 13.

Scheme 13

CO coordination to the metal center in 14 appears to be weak, as degassing a solution of 14 in benzene caused the color to change from yellow to orange; reintroducing CO reverses the color change. Isotopically labeled 13CO can be introduced in this manner, allowing for the observation of a 13CO signal at 212 ppm in the 13C{1H} NMR spectrum. This relatively high-field value for a coordinated CO (δCO(9) = 255.6 ppm; δ (free CO) = 192 ppm) empirically matches the trend observed by IR spectroscopy in which 14 displays only a modest weakening of the C=O bond relative to free CO with respect to the dicarbonyl complex 9 (νCO(CO) = 2143 cm−1; νCO(14) = 2039 cm−1; νCO(9) = 1988, 1893). Ambiguity in assigning a formal oxidation state to transition metal alkyne complexes is common in the literature, but the metallacyclopropene character of the complex does appear to increase for more electropositive metal centers. Related TpNbX2(alkyne) complexes (Tp = tris-pyrazolylborate) are known to exhibit behavior consistent with both Nb(III) and Nb(V) character.61 In agreement with this literature, the reaction of 14 with HCl in MeOH points to both Nb(V)-metallacyclopropene and Nb(III)-alkyne character. Following the treatment of 14 with 1.0 M HCl in MeOH, a GC/MS analysis of the organic products confirmed the formation of β-methylstyrene in a 2:1 ratio with 1-phenyl-1-propyne, the starting alkyne (Scheme 14). The mechanisms leading to both of these products likely involve initial protonation at the metal center.62 The styrene product would form via subsequent proton transfer to one of the metallacyclopropene carbons followed by a second protonolysis of the Nb-alkenyl bond, while the alkyne would be liberated by the oxidative process of H+ addition to the metal. Niobium chemistry related to the latter reaction has been reported by Cummins and coworkers, who used an alkyne to “protect” Nb(III) chloride during a ligand metallation step.63 Oxidation of the resulting complex with I2 furnished the “deprotected” Nb(V) diiodide along with the starting alkyne.

Scheme 14.

Scheme 14

Summary and Conclusions

Our initial attempts at forming low-valent (BDI)Nb compounds supported by the imido ligand resulted in reductive cleavage of one of the ligand N–Cimine bonds. This reaction appears to constitute a general route for the introduction of imido groups onto early transition metals. In the current study, this cleavage led to the rare bis(imido) moiety, which has been largely unexplored for the Group 5 metals despite its widespread use within Group 6 chemistry. This disparity likely stems from the lack of available starting materials, as the concentration of four valencies at two coordination sites creates difficulties in forming stable complexes.

On attempting to form a Nb(III) complex supported by phosphines, chemical reduction of 1 in the presence of dmpe led to the Nb(IV) complex, 5. Attempts at forming related Nb(IV) complexes with monodentate phosphines were unsuccessful, suggesting that the higher coordination number and/or electron density provided by the chelating diphosphine were essential to the stability of the isolated Nb(IV) species.

During the course of the reaction leading to 2py, a blue solution was observed at low temperatures, which was assigned as the Nb(III) complex 3 based on chemical derivatization. This species was trapped with strong π-acids, leading to the tris(isocyanide) 6 and pyridine-coordinated dicarbonyl complex 7. These compounds were found to be indefinitely stable when stored under an inert atmosphere at room temperature, indicating that the propensity of the formally d2 metal center to undergo reductive cleavage of the ligand N–Cimine bond had been effectively quelled.

Oxidation of 3 with an aryl azide resulted in the formation of the Nb(V) bis(imido) complex 10, which is structurally analogous to the bis(imido) complexes described previously.38 This intermolecular redox reaction represents a third route to bis(imido) niobium complexes supported by the BDI ligand,38 indicating that the dearth of precedent for such complexes does not reflect the instability of the ligand bis(imido) motif.

The formation of thermally stable Nb(III) complexes led to a range of intermolecular reactivity unavailable with 3 due to its thermal instability. The addition of Ph2SO to the penta-coordinate dicarbonyl complex 9 gave a clean reaction to form the bis(μ-oxo) bridged dimer 11, which presumably results from dimerization of an initial terminal Nb=O functionality. The dicarbonyl complex 7 readily adds MeLi to generate the niobium acylate complex 12. This species contains a short Nb=C bond, consistent in magnitude to related alkylidene and carbene complexes. Initial attempts at methylating the acylate using common Me+ sources have been unsuccessful, but the anionic moiety may prove to be an interesting starting point for forming heterobimetallic dinuclear clusters.

In an initial application of the reducing capability of 9 toward C–C bond formation, the reaction of 9 with 4,4′-dichlorobenzophenone was found to result in the reductive coupling of two equivalents of the ketone to yield the pinacol coupling product. The mechanism leading to this product could proceed through a number of pathways, as literature precedent on related reactions indicates that either 2e or 1e processes may be operative. Further investigations into this and related reactions between the dicarbonyl and ketones may provide insight into the mechanism of a C–H bond activation reaction described previously, which was proposed to result from an intermediate 1: 1 acetone adduct of Nb(III).33

Finally, the reaction of PhC≡CMe with 9 led to the clean formation of a metallacyclopropene complex, 14. This species possesses a weakly coordinated CO ligand and was found to react with H+ to form both β-methylstyrene and 1-phenyl-1-propyne, which indicates significant contribution from both the Nb(III) and Nb(V) resonance structures to the overall electronic structure of the complex.

Experimental

General Considerations

Unless otherwise noted, all reactions were performed using standard Schlenk line techniques or in an MBraun inert atmosphere box under an atmosphere of nitrogen (<1 ppm O2/H2O). Glassware, cannulae, and Celite were stored in an oven at ca. 425 K. Pentane, hexane, Et2O, THF, toluene, and benzene were purified by passage through a column of activated alumina and degassed prior to use.64 Pyridine was distilled from CaH2. Deuterated solvents were vacuum-transferred from either sodium/benzophenone (C6D6, THF-d8) or CaH2 (pyridine-d5) and degassed with three freeze-pump-thaw cycles. NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker AV-300, AVQ-400, AVB-400, DRX-500, AV-500, and AV-600 spectrometers. 1H and 13C{1H} chemical shifts were measured relative to residual solvent peaks, which were calibrated with an external TMS standard set to 0.00 ppm. Proton and carbon NMR assignments were routinely confirmed by 1H-1H (COSY) or 1H-13C (HSQC and HMBC) experiments. Infrared (IR) samples were either prepared as Nujol mulls and taken between KBr disks or prepared in solution and taken between NaCl plates. MesN3,65 dmpe,66 and KC867 were prepared using standard literature procedures. PhC≡CMe was purified by passage through a plug of activated alumina prior to use. All other reagents were acquired from commercial sources and used as received. Elemental analyses were determined at the College of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley. The X-ray structural determinations were performed at CHEXRAY, University of California, Berkeley on Bruker SMART 1000, SMART APEX, or MicroSTAR-H X8 APEXII diffractometers.

EPR Spectra Measurements

Solution EPR spectra were collected at 9.251 GHz (X-band) and 34.326 GHz (Q-band) frequencies at room temperature in benzene. X-band EPR spectra were collected using a Varian E-109 spectrometer equipped with an E-102 microwave bridge. Q-band EPR spectra were collected using a Bruker EPR spectrometer (EMX 10/12 with ER5106QT Flexline resonator). Both X- and Q-band measurements were taken with 100 kHz magnetic field modulation. The microwave frequency was calibrated using a standard sample of TEMPO (Aldrich, 30μM, 50 v/v% glycerol solution).

Representative procedure for X-ray crystallography

A crystal of appropriate size was coated in Paratone-N oil and mounted on a Kaptan© loop. The loop was transferred to a diffractometer equipped with a CCD area detector,68 centered in the beam, and cooled by a nitrogen flow low-temperature apparatus that had been previously calibrated by a thermocouple placed at the same position as the crystal. Preliminary orientation matrices and cell constants were determined by collection of 60 10 s frames, followed by spot integration and least-squares refinement. An arbitrary hemisphere of data was collected, and the raw data were integrated using SAINT.69 Cell dimensions reported were calculated from all reflections with I > 10 σ. The data were corrected for Lorentz and polarization effects; no correction for crystal decay was applied. Data were analyzed for agreement and possible absorption using XPREP.70 An empirical absorption correction based on comparison of redundant and equivalent reflections was applied using SADABS.71 Structures were solved by direct methods with the aid of successive difference Fourier maps and were refined on F2 using the SHELXTL 5.0 software package. Thermal parameters for all non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. ORTEP diagrams were created using the ORTEP-3 software package.72 For all structures, R1 = Σ(|Fo| − |Fc|)/Σ(|Fo|); wR2 = [Σ{w(Fo2Fc2)2}/Σ{w(Fo2)2}]1/2. See reference 33 for complete crystallographic data on compound 9.

(mad)Nb(NAr)(NtBu)(py) (2•py)

A flask containing a suspension of 1 (335 mg, 0.46 mmol) in Et2O (20 mL) was cooled to −72 °C, and to it was added a suspension of KC8 (124 mg, 0.92 mmol) in Et2O (10 mL). The solution rapidly darkened to a deep blue color. Stirring was continued at −72 °C until all of the starting materials were consumed (ca. 10 min). The flask was then allowed to warm to room temperature, during which time the color of the solution turned progressively green, then yellow. Stirring was continued for 12 h; the volatile material was then removed in vacuo and the residue was extracted with pentane (3 × 15 mL). The filtrate was concentrated and stored at −35 °C until crystalline material formed. The product was collected by filtration and the residual solvent was removed under vacuum. Yield: 70 mg, 23%. 1H NMR (500 MHz, C6D6, 298 K): δ 8.36 (dd, 2H, py), 7.27 (d, 2H, Nb=NArm), 7.01 (t, 1H, Nb=NArp), 6.87 (dd, 1H, C=NAr), 6.81 (t, 1H, C=NAr), 6.80 (d, 1H, HC(C(Me)NAr)(CMe), 4JHH = 1 Hz), 6.58 (dd, 1H, C=NAr), 6.50 (tt, 1H, py), 6.11 (m, 2H, py), 4.76 (sept, 2H, HCMe2 of Nb=NAr), 3.62 (sept, 1H, HCMe2 of C=NAr), 2.95 (sept, 1H, HCMe2 of C=NAr), 2.91 (d, 3H, HC(C(Me)NAr)(CMe)), 4JHH = 1.0 Hz), 1.64 (s, 3H, HC(C(Me)NAr)(CMe)), 1.52 (s, 9H, tBu), 1.50 (d, 6H, HCMe2 of Nb=NAr), 1.33 (d, 3H, HCMe2 of C=NAr), 1.23 (d, 6H, HCMe2 of Nb=NAr), 1.05 (d, 3H, HCMe2 of C=NAr), 1.00 (d, 3H, HCMe2 of C=NAr), 0.80 (d, 3H, HCMe2 of C=NAr). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, C6D6): δ 185.93 ((HC(C(Me)NAr)(CMe)), 154.04 ((HC(C(Me)NAr)(CMe)), 153.42 (py), 145.37 (Ar), 142.75 (2 × Nb=NAr), 141.78 (Ar), 141.21 (Ar), 137.73 (py), 131.75 ((HC(C(Me)NAr)(CMe)), 126.32 (Ar), 124.20 (Ar), 123.68 (Ar), 123.53 (py), 122.84 (Nb=NAr), 120.92 (Ar), 64.77 (tBu, Cα), 34.54 (HC(C(Me)NAr)(CMe)), 34.32 (tBu, Cβ), 28.99 (CHMe2 of C=NAr), 28.21 (CHMe2 of C=NAr), 27.58 (CHMe2 of Nb=NAr), 25.13 (CHMe2 of C=NAr), 25.05 (CHMe2 of C=NAr), 25.03 (CHMe2 of Nb=NAr), 24.79 (CHMe2 of Nb=NAr), 24.51 (CHMe2 of C=NAr), 23.56 (CHMe2 of C=NAr), 23.16 (HC(C(Me)NAr)(CMe)). Anal. Calcd for C38H55N4Nb: C, 69.07; H, 8.39; N, 8.48. Found: C, 68.81, H 8.56; N, 8.54.

(mad)Nb(NAr)(NTBu)(thf) (2•thf)

A solution of 4 (300 mg, 0.49 mmol) in 10 mL THF was added to a 100 mL Schlenk flask. The yellow solution was degassed by three freeze-pump-thaw cycles. Then, with the solution frozen, the flask was back-filled with an atmosphere of H2. The flask was sealed tightly and allowed to warm to room temperature with stirring as the solid melted. The color rapidly changed from pale yellow to orange upon thawing. The solution was stirred overnight, then the volatile materials were removed under vacuum, and the residue was extracted with pentane (2 × 15 mL) and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated to ca. 5 mL and stored at −35 °C until a bright yellow crystalline solid formed. The crystalline material collected by filtration and the residual solvent was removed under vacuum. Yield: 77 mg, 24%. 1H NMR (500 MHz, C6D6, 298K): δ 7.28 (d, 2H, Nb=NArm), 7.06-7.01 (m, 3H, Nb=NArp and C=NArm), 6.97 (dd, 1H, C=NArp), 6.64 (d, 1H, HC(C(Me)NAr)(CMe), 4JHH = 1.0 Hz), 4.85 (sept, 2H, HCMe2 of Nb=NAr), 3.64 (sept, 1H, HCMe2 of C=NAr), 3.57 (m, 2H, THF), 3.25 (m, 2H, THF), 3.10 (sept, 1H, HCMe2 of C=NAr), 2.75 (d, 4JHH = 1.0 Hz, 3H, HC(C(Me)NAr)(CMe)), 1.53 (d, 6H, CHMe2 of Nb=NAr), 1.52 (s, 9H, tBu), 1.42 (d, 6H, CHMe2 of Nb=NAr), 1.35 (d, 3H, CHMe2 of C=NAr), 1.15 (d, 3H, CHMe2 of C=NAr), 1.09 (d, 3H, CHMe2 of C=NAr), 1.06 (d, 3H, CHMe2 of C=NAr), 1.00 (m, 4H, THF). 13C NMR (125 MHz, C6D6, 298K): δ 185.25 (HC(C(Me)NAr)(CMe)), 153.3 ((HC(C(Me)NAr)(CMe)), 145.11 (Ar), 143.27 (2 × Nb=NAr), 142.30 (Ar), 142.11 (Ar), 130.43 ((HC(C(Me)NAr)(CMe)), 126.71 (Ar), 124.52 (Ar), 123.84 (Ar), 122.79 (Nb=NAr), 121.42 (Ar), 77.92 (THF), 64.53 (tBu, Cα), 34.71 (tBu, Cβ), 34.16 (HC(C(Me)NAr)(CMe)), 29.36 (CHMe2 of C=NAr), 28.16 (CHMe2 of C=NAr), 27.60 (CHMe2 of Nb=NAr), 25.72 (THF), 25.43 (CHMe2 of Nb=NAr), 25.25 (CHMe2 of C=NAr), 24.88 (CHMe2, 4C from Nb=NAr and C=NAr), 23.84 (CHMe2 of C=NAr), 22.62 (HC(C(Me)NAr)(CMe)). Anal. Calcd for C37H58N3NbO: C, 67.97; H, 8.94; N, 6.43. Found: C, 67.72, H 9.18; N, 6.33.

(BDI)Nb(N tBu)Cl(dmpe) 5

Et2O (15 mL) was added to a Schlenk flask containing 1 (300 mg, 0.41 mmol) and dmpe (123 mg, 0.82 mmol). The flask was cooled to −72 °C, then a cold (−72 °C) slurry of KC8 in Et2O (5 mL) was added by cannula transfer. The color quickly turned dark yellow-brown. The flask was sealed and the solution was stirred overnight at room temperature, after which time the color turned yellow-green. The volatile materials were removed under vacuum, and the product was extracted with pentane (3 × 10 mL). The filtrate was concentrated until a microcrystalline material began to form. Filtration of this solution and storage of the filtrate at −40 °C caused crystallization of the product as yellow-green dichroic crystals. The crystals were collected by filtration and the residual solvent was removed under vacuum. Yield: 120 mg, 38 %. 1H NMR (400 MHz, C6D6, 298 K): broad signals observed at d 9.86, 8.41, 6.36, 3.56, 2.16, 1.81, 1.24, −2.10. Anal. Calcd for C39H66ClN3NbP2: C, 61.05; H, 8.67; N, 5.48. Found: C, 61.41, H 8.97; N, 5.85. μeff = 1.53 μB (Evans’ method,73 benzene, 22 °C)

(BDI)Nb(NtBu)(CNXyl)3 6

A suspension of KC8 (66.5 mg, 0.49 mmol) in Et2O (5 mL) was cooled to −72 °C and added by cannula to a stirred slurry of 1 (180 mg, 0.25 mmol) in Et2O (15 mL) at −72 °C. The resulting slurry was stirred for 10 min at −72 °C, then XylNC (96.8 mg, 0.74 mmol) was added as a solid in one portion. The color of the solution immediately turned dark red then slowly blue-green on warming to room temperature. The slurry was stirred overnight, then the volatile materials were removed under vacuum, leaving the dark blue-green solid. The product was extracted with pentane (2 × 15 mL), filtered, and concentrated until a purple microcrystalline material began to form. Storing the flask at −40 °C for 2 d precipitated more purple material. The solid was collected by filtration and the residual solvent was removed under vacuum. Yield: 77 mg, 32 %. 1H NMR (500 MHz, C6D6, 298 K): δ 7.21 (br s, 3H), 6.91 (br s, 3H), 6.80 (m, 9H), 5.23 (s, 1H, HC(C(Me)NAr)2), 4.01 (br sept, 2H, CHMe2), 3.60 (br sept, 2H, CHMe2), 2.45 (s, 12H, Xyl), 2.29 (s, 6H, Xyl), 2.12 (br s, 3H, HC(C(Me)NAr)2), 1.91 (br s, 3H, HC(C(Me)NAr)2), 1.37 (br d, 6H, CHMe2), 1.28 (br d, 6H, CHMe2), 1.21 (br d, 6H, CHMe2), 1.10 (br d, 6H, CHMe2), 1.07 (s, 9H, tBu). 1H NMR (500 MHz, THF-d8, 223 K): δ 7.18 (m, 4H, Ar), 7.07 (m, 5H), 6.95 (m, 3H), 6.84 (m, 3H), 5.05 (s, 1H, HC(C(Me)NAr)2), 3.77 (sept, 2H, CHMe2), 3.36 (sept, 2H, CHMe2), 2.43 (s, 12H, Xyl), 2.18 (s, 6H, Xyl), 1.99 (s, 3H, HC(C(Me)NAr)2), 1.71 (s, 3H, HC(C(Me)NAr)2), 1.12 (m, 12H, CHMe2), 1.00 (d, 6H, CHMe2), 0.92 (d, 6H, CHMe2), 0.75 (s, 9H, tBu). 13C{1H} NMR (125.8 MHz, THF-d8, 223 K): δ 161.9, 158.8, 152.6, 152.5, 143.9, 142.8, 133.7, 132.8, 129.9, 129.0, 128.5, 127.6, 127.4, 125.0, 124.6, 124.4, 124.1, 94.2, 66.8, 32.9, 28.7, 28.5, 27.4, 26.2, 26.0, 25.7, 25.5, 20.5, 19.2. IR (KBr, nujol, cm−1): 2011 (s), 1986 (s). Anal. Calcd for C60H77N6Nb: C, 73.90; H, 7.96; N, 8.62. Found: C, 73.51, H 8.03; N, 8.46.

(BDI)Nb(NtBu)(CO)2(py) 7

A solution of 3 was prepared as for 6, using 500 mg of 1 (0.68 mmol) and 194 mg of KC8 (1.44 mmol). CO was admitted by slowly bubbling the gas through the cold slurry for 2 min; the color of the solution immediately turned red. After warming to room temperature, the solution was stirred for 1 h, then the volatile materials were removed under vacuum. Extraction of the product with pentane (50 mL) gave a dark red solution, which was concentrated (35 mL), filtered, and stored at −40 °C for several days. The red crystalline material that formed was collected by filtration and any residual solvent was removed under vacuum. Yield: 182 mg, 37 %. 1H NMR (600 MHz, C6D6, 298 K): δ 8.90 (br d, 2H, py), 7.20 (m, 4H, Ar), 7.07 (br s, 2H, Ar), 6.80 (br m, 1H, py), 6.50 (br s, 2H, py), 5.24 (s, 1H, HC(C(Me)NAr)2), 3.78 (br s, 1H, CHMe2), 3.15 (br s, 1H, CHMe2), 2.67 (br s, 1H, CHMe2), 2.44 (br s, 1H, CHMe2), 1.92 (br s, 3H), 1.78 (br s, 3H), 1.73 (br s, 3H), 1.62 (br s, 3H), 1.28 (br s, 3H), 1.14 (br s, 3H), 0.96 (br s, tBu), 0.82 (br s, 3H), 0.74 (br s, 3H). 1H NMR (500 MHz, C6H5Cl/10% C6D6, 253 K): δ 9.26 (s, 1H, py), 8.60 (s, 1H, py), 5.22 (s, 1H, HC(C(Me)NAr)2), 3.70 (sept, 1H, CHMe2), 3.07 (sept, 1H, CHMe2), 2.62 (sept, 1H, CHMe2), 2.39 (sept, 1H, CHMe2), 1.89 (s, 3H, HC(C(Me)NAr)2), 1.72 (s, 3H, HC(C(Me)NAr)2), 1.67 (d, 3H, CHMe2), 1.54 (d, 3H, CHMe2), 1.21 (d, 3H, CHMe2), 1.07 (d, 3H, CHMe2), 0.99 (d, 3H, CHMe2), 0.95 (d, 3H, CHMe2), 0.90 (s, 9H, tBu), 0.77 (d, 3H, CHMe2), 0.71 (d, 3H, CHMe2). 13C{1H} NMR (125.7 MHz, C6H5Cl/10% C6D6, 253 K): δ 250.2, 243.6, 164.5, 163.2, 153.3, 153.2, 149.8, 149.5, 143.9, 143.5, 143.0, 142.7, 141.8, 141.6, 137.2, 125.9, 125.8, 124.1, 124.0, 123.9, 123.5, 96.0, 65.5, 30.7, 29.1, 29.0, 28.6, 28.5, 26.1, 25.9, 25.7, 25.6, 25.1, 25.0, 24.8, 24.8, 24.7, 24.5. Anal. Calcd for C40H55N4NbO2: C, 67.02; H, 7.73; N, 7.82. Found: C, 66.90, H 7.89; N, 7.90. IR (KBr, nujol, cm−1): 1954 (s), 1863 (s).

(BDI)Nb(NtBu)(CO)2 9

An alternative synthesis33 of 9 can be performed as follows, providing the product in higher overall yields. A solution of 1 (1.46 g, 2.0 mmol) in Et2O (50 mL) was cooled to −40 °C. With vigorous stirring, a solution of MeMgBr in Et2O (1.33 mL, 3.0 M, 4.0 mmol) was added dropwise by syringe. The solution rapidly turned bright yellow and a white precipitate formed. The flask was allowed to warm to room temperature, then the volatile materials were removed under vacuum. The yellow material was extracted with hexane (3 × 35 mL) and the solution was filtered into a 500 mL round-bottom flask to give a clear yellow filtrate. The yellow solution was stirred and cooled to 0 °C, then a solution of tBuNC (226.3 μL, 2.0 mmol) in Et2O (10 mL) was added dropwise by syringe. The solution immediately turned dark red. After 15 min of stirring at room temperature, the red solution was concentrated to 50 mL, then the headspace of the flask was back-filled with CO (1 atm). The flask was sealed and the solution was stirred vigorously for 4 h after which time the headspace was refilled with CO to maintain 1 atm of pressure. Stirring for a further 8 h resulted in a dark green solution indicating completion of the reaction. The solution was concentrated until a green crystalline material began to form; storage of the sealed flask at −40 °C for 24 h caused the product to precipitate as dark yellow-green dichroic blocks. The material was collected by filtration and the residual solvent was removed under vacuum. Yield: 919 mg, 72 % (from two crops). The analytical data for 9 prepared by this method were identical to those given previously.

(BDI)Nb(NtBu)(NMes)(py) 10

A flask containing a suspension of 1 (817 mg, 1.12 mmol) in Et2O (30 mL) was cooled to −72 °C, and to it was added a cold (−72 °C) suspension of KC8 (302 mg, 2.23 mmol) in Et2O (10 mL). The solution rapidly darkened to a deep blue color. Stirring was continued at −72 °C for 10 min, then a solution of MesN3 in Et2O (5 mL) at −72 °C was added by cannula, causing the solution to rapidly turn dark orange. The cold bath was removed and the solution was allowed to attain room temperature. After stirring for 12 h at room temperature, the volatile materials were removed under vacuum, and the product was extracted with pentane (3 × 10 mL), concentrated, and stored at −40 °C for 2 d. An orange microcrystalline solid was collected and the residual solvent was removed under vacuum. Yield 408 mg, 46 %. 1H NMR (400 MHz, C6D6, 298 K): δ 8.20 (br s, 1H, py), 7.16 (br s, 3H), 7.06 (br s, 3H), 6.88 (br s, 1H), 6.51 (br s, 2H), 6.15 (br s, 2H), 5.23 (s, 1H, HC(C(Me)NAr)2), 3.82 (br sept, 2H, CHMe2), 3.68 (br s, 1H, CHMe2), 3.34 (br s, 1H, CHMe2), 2.98 (s, 3H, Mes), 2.80 (s, 3H, Mes), 2.31 (s, 3H, Mes), 1.73 (br s, 3H, HC(C(Me)NAr)2), 1.66 (br s, 3H, HC(C(Me)NAr)2), 1.61 (d, 6H, CHMe2), 1.28 (d, 9H, CHMe2), 1.14 (d, 6H, CHMe2), 0.77 (s, 9H, tBu), 0.60 (br s, 3H, CHMe2). 1H NMR (400 MHz, THF-d8, 233 K): δ 8.51 (d, 1H), 7.58 (m, 2H), 7.25 (m, 2H), 7.02 (m, 4H), 6.80 (t, 1H), 6.73 (s, 2H), 6.57 (d, 1H), 5.37 (s, 1H, HC(C(Me)NAr)2), 3.70 (m, 2H, CHMe2), 3.29 (sept, 1H, CHMe2), 3.22 (sept, 1H, CHMe2), 2.61 (s, 3H, Mes), 2.40 (s, 3H, Mes), 2.23 (s, 3H, Mes), 1.78 (s, 3H, HC(C(Me)NAr)2), 1.71 (s, 3H, HC(C(Me)NAr)2), 1.58 (d, 3H, CHMe2), 1.44 (d, 3H, CHMe2), 1.30 (d, 3H, CHMe2), 1.16 (d, 3H, CHMe2), 1.06 (d, 3H, CHMe2), 0.85 (d, 3H, CHMe2), 0.77 (d, 3H, CHMe2), 0.45 (d, 3H, CHMe2), 0.40 (s, 9H, tBu). 13C{1H} NMR (125.8 MHz, THF-d8, 223K): δ 167.70, 167.23, 155.31, 153.95, 152.93, 152.67, 148.90, 143.62, 143.35, 142.42, 142.04, 138.10, 134.16, 129.57, 129.34, 128.85, 128.07, 126.69, 125.67, 125.08, 124.72, 124.56, 124.19, 122.76, 100.34, 65.70, 33.07, 32.53, 29.96, 29.17, 28.82, 27.80, 27.36, 26.13, 25.01, 24.87, 24.73, 24.66, 24.03, 21.52, 21.46, 20.89. Anal. Calcd for C47H66N5Nb: C, 71.10; H, 8.38; N, 8.82. Found: C, 70.76, H 8.30; N, 8.83.

[(BDI)Nb(NtBu)]22-O)2 11

A solution of Ph2SO (15.2 mg, 0.08 mmol) in benzene (2 mL) was added to a solution of 9 (47.8 mg, 0.08 mmol) in benzene (5 mL) at room temperature. The solution quickly turned dark yellow-green and began to effervesce slowly. The homogeneous mixture was allowed to stand at room temperature for 12 h over which time the color turned bright yellow and a yellow crystalline solid deposited from solution. The solvent was decanted and the solid was washed with benzene (5 mL) and collected by filtration. Residual solvent was removed under vacuum to yield a bright yellow crystalline solid. Yield: 40 mg, 86 %. NMR data for the majority species before product precipitation: 1H NMR (500 MHz, C6D6, 298 K): δ 7.30 (m, 4H, Ar), 6.92 (m, 2H, Ar), 5.22 (s, 1H, HC(C(Me)NAr)2), 3.79 (sept, 2H, CHMe2), 2.99 (sept, 2H, CHMe2), 1.47 (s, 6H, HC(C(Me)NAr)2), 1.42 (d, 6H, CHMe2), 1.26 (s, 9H, tBu), 1.24 (d, 6H, CHMe2), 1.07 (d, 6H, CHMe2), 0.56 (d, 6H, CHMe2). The low solubility of 11 in common organic solvents prevented further characterization by NMR spectroscopy. Anal. Calcd for C66H100N6Nb2O2: C, 66.32; H, 8.43; N, 7.03. Found: C, 66.11, H 8.69; N, 7.12.

[(BDI)Nb(NtBu)(C(Me)OLi)(CO)]2 12

MeLi in Et2O (1.7 M, 0.123 mL, 0.21 mmol) was added dropwise to a stirred solution of 7 (150 mg, 0.21 mmol) in Et2O (5 mL) at room temperature. The solution immediately turned dark orange as a microcrystalline precipitate began to form. Pentane (1 mL) was added and the solution was allowed to stand at room temperature for 2 h, over which time more microcrystalline solid precipitated from solution. The supernatant was decanted and the residual solvent was removed from the crystalline material under vacuum to yield a dark orange powder. Yield: 94 mg, 68 %. 1H NMR (500 MHz, C6H5Cl/10 % C6D6, 298 K, major isomer): δ 5.48 (s, 1H, HC(C(Me)NAr)2), 3.62 (sept, 1H, CHMe2), 3.14 (sept, 1H, CHMe2), 2.90 (sept, 1H, CHMe2), 2.81 (sept, 1H, CHMe2), 1.92 (s, 3H), 1.90 (s, 3H), 1.89 (s, 3H), 1.42 (d, 3H, CHMe2), 1.38 (d, 3H, CHMe2), 1.26 (m, 18H, CHMe2), 1.18 (d, 3H, CHMe2), 1.13 (d, 3H, CHMe2), 1.07 (d, 3H, CHMe2), 0.98 (br s, tBu). 1H NMR (500 MHz, C6H5Cl/10 % C6D6, 298 K, minor isomer): δ 5.47 (s, 1H, HC(C(Me)NAr)2), 3.64 (sept, 1H, CHMe2), 3.07 (sept, 1H, CHMe2), 2.83 (sept, 1H, CHMe2), 2.81 (sept, 1H, CHMe2), 1.93 (s, 3H), 1.92 (s, 3H), 1.90 (s, 3H), 1.54 (d, 3H, CHMe2), 1.33 (d, 3H, CHMe2), 1.26 (m, 6H, CHMe2), 1.24 (d, 3H, CHMe2), 1.22 (d, 3H, CHMe2), 1.12 (d, 3H, CHMe2), 1.05 (d, 3H, CHMe2), 0.93 (s, tBu). Anal. Calcd for C72H106Li2N6Nb2O4: C, 65.55; H, 8.10; N, 6.37. Found: C, 65.18, H 8.21; N, 6.55. IR (KBr, nujol, cm−1): 1951 (s).

(BDI)Nb(NtBu)(O2C2ArCl4) 13

A solution of 4,4′-Cl2-benzophenone (82.8 mg, 0.31 mmol) in toluene (3 mL) was added dropwise to a stirred solution of 2.1 (105 mg, 0.16 mmol) in toluene (5 mL) at room temperature. The solution effervesced rapidly as the color changed from dark green to bright yellow. After 20 min at room temperature, the volatile materials were removed under vacuum to give a bright yellow powder. The product was crystallized from a concentrated toluene solution stored at −35 °C for 3 d. The crystallized product was collected by filtration and the residual solvent was removed under vacuum to provide a yellow powder. Yield: 128 mg, 71 %. 1H NMR (500 MHz, C6D6, 298 K): δ 7.27 (d, 4H), 7.03 (m, 4H), 6.94 (dd, 2H), 6.91 (d, 4H), 6.76 (d, 4H), 6.57 (d, 4H), 5.37 (s, 1H, HC(C(Me)NAr)2), 4.06 (sept, 2H, CHMe2), 2.26 (sept, 2H, CHMe2), 1.61 (s, 6H, HC(C(Me)NAr)2), 1.44 (s, 9H, tBu), 1.24 (d, 6H, CHMe2), 1.18 (d, 6H, CHMe2), 0.94 (d, 6H, CHMe2), 0.82 (d, 6H, CHMe2). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, THF-d8, 313 K): δ 171.0, 147.7, 147.0, 146.5, 144.3, 143.2, 132.8, 132.4, 131.7, 131.2, 129.8, 129.0, 128.0, 127.7, 126.8, 125.7, 124.8, 107.5, 107.2, 71.4, 33.0, 29.3, 28.6, 26.3, 26.4, 26.0, 25.8, 24.7. Anal. Calcd for C59H66Cl4N3NbO2: C, 65.38; H, 6.14; N, 3.88. Found: C, 66.54, H 5.95; N, 4.09 (average of two measurements; both measurements where greater than 0.4 % above the calculated value for carbon which is due to the presence of residual toluene in the sample).

(BDI)Nb(NtBu)(η2-MeCCPh)(CO) 14

PhC≡CMe (9.62 μL, 0.08 mmol) was added by pipette to a solution of 2.1 (49 mg, 0.08 mmol) in C6D6 (0.6 mL). The solution rapidly effervesced as the color turned from dark green to bright yellow. The solution was transferred to an NMR tube and quickly cooled in the probe to 253 K for analysis. For introduction of 13CO, the solution was added to a J. Young tube and degassed with three freeze-pump-thaw cycles. After warming the solution to room temperature following the third cycle, the tube was refilled with 13CO, sealed and shaken vigorously. The material was characterized without isolation due to the thermal instability of the product. The product was characterized in solution by NMR and IR spectroscopies. 1H NMR (500 MHz, C7D8, 253 K): δ 7.40 (d, 2H, PhC≡CMe), 7.27 (t, 2H, PhC≡CMe), 7.15-6.90 (m, 7H, Ar and PhC≡CMe), 5.20 (s, 1H, HC(C(Me)NAr)2), 3.81 (sept, 1H, CHMe2), 3.45 (m, 2H, CHMe2), 2.75 (s, 3H, PhC≡CMe), 2.41 (sept, 1H, CHMe2), 1.84 (s, 3H, HC(C(Me)NAr)2), 1.52 (m, 9H, CHMe2 and HC(C(Me)NAr)2), 1.23 (d, 3H, CHMe2), 1.10 (d, 3H, CHMe2), 1.93 (d, 3H, CHMe2), 0.86 (m, 6H, CHMe2), 0.80 (d, 3H, CHMe2), 0.74 (s, tBu). 13C{1H} NMR (125.7 MHz, C7D8, 253 K): δ 213.5 (CO, Δν1/2 = 54 Hz), 179.9, 179.7, 168.5, 164.2, 152.6, 152.0, 151.7, 150.3, 142.1, 142.0, 141.9, 141.7, 141.3, 131.7, 130.6, 129.1, 128.4, 126.4, 125.6, 124.9, 124.5, 124.6, 123.6, 100.2, 68.4, 31.0, 29.1, 28.9, 27.7, 27.3, 25.4, 25.2, 25.2, 24.8, 24.6, 24.4, 24.3, 24.0, 23.2, 18.2. IR (Si0, benzene, cm−1): 2039 (s).

Supplementary Material

1_si_001

Table 1.

Crystallographic data for compounds 2py, 2thf, 5, and 6.

2•py 2•thf 5 6
Formula C38H55N4Nb C37H58N3NbO C39H66ClN3NbP2 C60H77N6Nb
Formula weight 660.77 653.77 767.25 975.19
Space Group P212121 P212121 P21/n P21/n
a (Å) 10.847(17) 10.486(2) 13.149(1) 17.217(1)
b (Å) 17.61(4) 18.636(3) 19.025(2) 15.633(1)
c (Å) 21.45(4) 21.082(4) 16.896(2) 20.637(2)
α (°) 90 90 90 90
β (°) 90 90 105.557(1) 103.469(5)
γ (°) 90 90 90 90
V3) 4099(13) 4119.6(12) 4072.0(7) 5401.7(8)
Z 4 4 4 4
ρcalcd (g/cm3) 1.071 1.054 1.252 1.199
F000 1408 1400 1636 2080
μ (mm−1) 0.32 0.32 0.47 0.21
Tmin/Tmax 0.769670 0.871553 0.925258 0.7418
No. rflns measured 20155 16324 17946 40699
No. indep. rflns 6838 5052 6807 9642
Rint 0.0730 0.0580 0.0250 0.0516
No. obs. (I > 2.00σ(I)) 5384 4365 5337 7815
No. variables 388 389 434 605
R1, wR2 0.0570, 0.1246 0.0417, 0.0896 0.0363, 0.0929 0.0396, 0.1066
R1 (all data) 0.0771 0.0504 0.0528 0.0518
GoF 1.021 0.966 1.113 1.340
Res. peak/hole (e3) 0.830/−0.468 0.320/−0.336 0.836/−0.304 0.624/−0.851
CCDC ref. # 770334 770335 770336 770337

Table 2.

Crystallographic data for compounds 7, 10, 11, and 12.

7 10 11 12
Formula C40H55N4NbO2 C47H66N5Nb C66H100N6Nb2O2 C36H53Cl2LiN3NbO2
Formula weight 716.79 793.96 1195.35 730.56
Space Group P21/n P21/n C2/c P-1
a (Å) 9.159(1) 12.471(3) 21.829(1) 11.434(1)
b (Å) 35.775(5) 17.964(4) 14.057(1) 12.999(1)
c (Å) 11.628(2) 19.609(4) 22.763(1) 14.214(1)
α (°) 90 90 90 73.069(1)
β (°) 93.587(2) 96.922(3) 114.707(1) 85.136(1)
γ (°) 90 90 90 74.461(1)
V3) 3802.6(8) 4361.3(15) 6345.2(6) 1947.13(16)
Z 4 4 8 2
ρcalcd (g/cm3) 1.252 1.209 1.251 1.246
F000 1520 1696 2544 768
μ (mm−1) 0.35 0.31 0.41 0.48
Tmin/Tmax 0.8732 0.874393 0.8556 0.854988
No. rflns measured 41368 14628 65971 40569
No. indep. rflns 6958 4437 5839 7101
Rint 0.0828 0.0487 0.0838 0.0742
No. obs. (I > 2.00σ(I)) 5097 3409 4552 5541
No. variables 426 478 395 419
R1, wR2 0.0436, 0.0758 0.0356, 0.0832 0.0462, 0.1198 0.0607, 0.1573
R1 (all data) 0.0729 0.0551 0.0654 0.0827
GoF 1.147 1.114 1.481 1.260
Res. peak/hole (e3) 0.350/−0.454 0.306/−0.226 1.348/−0.628 1.487/−0.914
CCDC ref. # 770338 770339 770340 770341

Acknowledgments

We thank the American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund (ACS-47249AC3), the National Science Foundation (CHE-0416309), and the National Institutes of Health (R01-GM025459-29) for funding.

Footnotes

*

Dedicated to Prof. Dietmar Seyferth, for his many scientific contributions and his long and dedicated service to both Organometallics as well as the organometallic and inorganic communities.

Supporting Information Available. Complete crystallographic data for compounds 2py, 2thf, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12 (CIF). This information is available free of charge via the Internet at http://www.pubs.acs.org.

References

  • 1.Negishi E. Acc Chem Res. 1987;20:65. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sato F, Urabe H, Okamoto S. Chem Rev. 2000;100:2835. doi: 10.1021/cr990277l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Demerseman B, Bouquet G, Bigorne M. J Organomet Chem. 1976;107:C19. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Thomas J, Brown K. J Organomet Chem. 1976;111:297. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Demerseman B, Bouquet G, Bigorne M. J Organomet Chem. 1977;132:223. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fachinetti G, Fochi G, Floriani C. J Chem Soc, Chem Commun. 1976:230. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gell KI, Schwartz J. J Am Chem Soc. 1981;103:2687. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Broene RD, Buchwald SL. Science. 1993;261:1696. doi: 10.1126/science.8378769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Erker G. Acc Chem Res. 1984;17:103. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Erker G, Kropp K. J Am Chem Soc. 1979;101:3660. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.McDade C, Bercaw JE. J Organomet Chem. 1985;279:281. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Negishi E, Cederbaum FE, Takahashi T. Tet Lett. 1986;27:2829. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nugent WA, Mayer JM. Metal-Ligand Multiple Bonds. John Wiley & Sons; New York: 1988. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wigley D. Prog Inorg Chem. 1994;42:239. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Adams N, Arts HJ, Bolton PD, Cowell D, Dubberley SR, Friederichs N, Grant CM, Kranenburg M, Sealey AJ, Wang B, Wilson PJ, Cowley AR, Mountford P, Schroder M. Chem Commun. 2004:434. doi: 10.1039/b313921b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Britovsek GJP, Gibson VC, Wass DF. Angew Chem Int Ed. 1999;38:428. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19990215)38:4<428::AID-ANIE428>3.0.CO;2-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gibson VC, Spitzmesser SK. Chem Rev. 2003;103:283. doi: 10.1021/cr980461r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Suzuki Y, Terao H, Fujita T. Bull Chem Soc Jpn. 2003;76:1493. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mitani M, Saito J, Ishii SI, Nakayama Y, Makio H, Matsukawa N, Matsui S, Mohri JI, Furuyama R, Terao H, Bando H, Tanaka H, Fujita T. Chem Rec. 2004;4:137. doi: 10.1002/tcr.20010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hagadorn JR, Arnold J. Organometallics. 1994;13:4670. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hagadorn JR, Arnold J. J Am Chem Soc. 1996;118:893. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hagadorn JR, Arnold J. Inorg Chem. 1997;36:2928. doi: 10.1021/ic970413+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dawson DY, Arnold J. Organometallics. 1997;16:1111. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mullins SM, Hagadorn JR, Bergman RG, Arnold J. J Organomet Chem. 2000;607:227. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hagadorn JR, Arnold J. Angew Chem Int Ed. 1998;37:1729. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19980703)37:12<1729::AID-ANIE1729>3.0.CO;2-F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Figueroa JS, Cummins CC. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:4020. doi: 10.1021/ja028446y. and references cited therein. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fryzuk MD, Kozak CM, Bowridge MR, Jin W, Tung D, Patrick BO, Rettig SJ. Organometallics. 2001;20:3752. and references cited therein. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kilgore UJ, Tang X, Tomaszewski J, Huffman JC, Mindiola DJ. Inorg Chem. 2006;45:10712. doi: 10.1021/ic061642b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Basuli F, Kilgore UJ, Brown D, Huffman JC, Mindiola DJ. Organometallics. 2004;23:6166. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Basuli F, Huffman J, Mindiola D. Inorg Chim Acta. 2007;360:246. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bai G, Wei P, Stephan DW. Organometallics. 2006;25:2649. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hamaki H, Takeda N, Tokitoh N. Organometallics. 2006;25:2457. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tomson NC, Yan A, Arnold J, Bergman RG. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:11262. doi: 10.1021/ja803729k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Nikiforov GB, Roesky HW, Magull J, Labahn T, Vidovic D, Noltemeyer M, Schmidt HG, Hosmane NS. Polyhedron. 2003;22:2669. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Determined using the continuous symmetry parameter τ = (α − β)/60, where α and β are the largest and second largest angles about the metal center, respectively; Addison AW, Rao TN, Reedijk J, van Rijn J, Verschoor GC. J Chem Soc, Dalton Trans. 1984:1349.
  • 36.Mayer JM, Bercaw JE. J Am Chem Soc. 1982;104:2157. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sanchez-Nieves J, Frutos LM, Royo P, Castano O, Herdtweck E. Organometallics. 2005;24:2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tomson NC, Arnold J, Bergman RG. Organometallics. 2010 doi: 10.1021/om1001827. in press. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.(a) Fryzuk MD, Kozak CM, Bowdridge MR, Jin WC, Tung D, Patrick BO, Rettig SJ. Organometallics. 2001;20:3752. [Google Scholar]; (b) Veige AS, Slaughter LM, Lobkovsky EB, Wolczanski PT, Matsunaga N, Decker SA, Cundari TR. Inorg Chem. 2003;42:6204. doi: 10.1021/ic0300114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Alcalde MI, Delamata J, Gomez M, Royo P, Pellinghelli MA, Tiripicchio A. Organometallics. 1994;13:462. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Garces A, Perez Y, Gomez-Ruiz S, Fajardo M, Antinolo A, Otero A, Lopez-Mardomingo C, Gomez-Sal P, Prashar S. J Organomet Chem. 2006;691:3652. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lin ZY, Hall MB. Coord Chem Rev. 1993;123:149. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Williams DS, Schofield MH, Schrock RR. Organometallics. 1993;12:4560. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Holm RH, Sung KM. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124:4312. doi: 10.1021/ja012735p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Orpen AG, Brammer L, Allen FH, Kennard O, Watson DG, Taylor R. J Chem Soc, Dalton Trans. 1989:S1. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Cordero B, Gomez V, Platero-Prats AE, Reves M, Echeverria J, Cremades E, Barragan F, Alvarez S. J Chem Soc, Dalton Trans. 2008:2832. doi: 10.1039/b801115j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Fischer EO, Maasbol A. Angew Chem Int Ed. 1964;3:580. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Grehl M, Berlekamp M, Erker G. Acta Crystallogr, Sect C: Cryst Struct Commun. 1995;51:1772. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Berlekamp M, Erker G, Petersen JL. J Organomet Chem. 1993;458:97. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Carnahan EM, Lippard SJ. J Am Chem Soc. 1992;114:4166. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Amaudrut J, Sala-Pala J, Guerchais JE, Mercier R. J Organomet Chem. 1990;391:61. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Erker G, Lecht R, Schlund R, Angermund K, Kruger C. Angew Chem Int Ed. 1987;26:666. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Roskamp EJ, Pedersen SF. J Am Chem Soc. 1987;109:6551. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Agapie T, Diaconescu PL, Mindiola DJ, Cummins CC. Organometallics. 2002;21:1329. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hou ZM, Miyano T, Yamazaki H, Wakatsuki Y. J Am Chem Soc. 1995;117:4421. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Clegg W, Eaborn C, Izod K, O’Shaughnessy P, Smith JD. Angew Chem Int Ed. 1997;36:2815. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.(a) Hou ZM, Jia XS, Hoshino M, Wakatsuki Y. Angew Chem Int Ed. 1997;36:1292. [Google Scholar]; (b) Hou ZM, Jia XS, Fujita A, Tezuka H, Yamazaki H, Wakatsuki Y. Chem Eur J. 2000;6:2994. doi: 10.1002/1521-3765(20000818)6:16<2994::aid-chem2994>3.0.co;2-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Domingos A, Lopes I, Waerenborgh JC, Marques N, Lin GY, Zhang XW, Takats J, McDonald R, Hillier AC, Sella A, Elsegood MRJ, Day VW. Inorg Chem. 2007;46:9415. doi: 10.1021/ic701364k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Lam CP, Anthon C, Heinemann FW, O’Connor JM, Meyer K. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:6567. doi: 10.1021/ja801007q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.(a) Covert KJ, Wolczanski PT. Inorg Chem. 1989;31:66. [Google Scholar]; (b) Covert KJ, Wolczanski PT, Hill SA, Krusic PJ. Inorg Chem. 1992;31:66. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Etienne M. Coord Chem Rev. 1996;156:201. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Labinger JA, Schwartz J. J Am Chem Soc. 1975;97:1596. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Figueroa JS, Cummins C. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:4020. doi: 10.1021/ja028446y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Alaimo PJ, Peters DW, Arnold J, Bergman RG. J Chem Educ. 2001;78:64. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Leyva E, Munoz D, Platz MS. J Org Chem. 1989;54:5938. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Burt RJ, Chatt J, Hussain W, Leigh GJ. J Organomet Chem. 1979;182:203. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Araya MA, Cotton FA, Matonic JH, Murillo CA. Inorg Chem. 1995;34:5424. [Google Scholar]
  • 68.SMART. Area-Detector Software Package. Bruker Analytical X-ray Systems, Inc; Madison, WI: 2001–2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.SAINT. SAX Area-Detector Integration Program, V6.40. Bruker Analytical X-ray Systems Inc; Madison, WI: 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.XPREP. Bruker Analytical X-ray Systems Inc; Madison, WI: 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 71.SADABS. Bruker-Nonius Area Detector Scaling and Absorption v. 2.05. Bruker Analytical X-ray Systems, Inc; Madison, WI: 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Farrugia LJ. J Appl Crystallogr. 1997;30:565. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Piguet C. J Chem Educ. 1997;74:815. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1_si_001

RESOURCES