Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1987 Oct;84(20):7349–7353. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.20.7349

Deficits in human visual spatial attention following thalamic lesions.

R D Rafal 1, M I Posner 1
PMCID: PMC299290  PMID: 3478697

Abstract

There has been speculation concerning the role that thalamic nuclei play in directing attention to locations in visual space [Crick, F. (1984) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81, 4586-4590]. We measured covert shifts of visual attention in three patients with unilateral thalamic hemorrhages shortly after the lesion and after a 6-month recovery period. The experiment measured reaction time to targets that occurred at locations to which attention had been cued (valid trials) or at a currently unattended location (invalid trials). Although the patients showed no deficits in visual fields with perimetry and no neglect in the 6-month follow-up, we found slow reaction times for targets on the side contralateral to the lesion whether or not attention had been cued to that location. Deficits have also been found in this task with cortical and midbrain lesions, but the patterns of performance are quite different. The results with thalamic patients suggest they have a specific deficit in the ability to use attention to improve the efficiency of processing visual targets contralateral to the lesion (engage operation). This finding is in accord with hypotheses of a thalamic link between cortical visual attention and pattern recognition systems proposed by Crick.

Full text

PDF
7349

Images in this article

7350Image
on p.7350
7350Image
on p.7350
7351Image
on p.7351
7351Image
on p.7351

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baron J. C., D'Antona R., Pantano P., Serdaru M., Samson Y., Bousser M. G. Effects of thalamic stroke on energy metabolism of the cerebral cortex. A positron tomography study in man. Brain. 1986 Dec;109(Pt 6):1243–1259. doi: 10.1093/brain/109.6.1243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bashinski H. S., Bacharach V. R. Enhancement of perceptual sensitivity as the result of selectively attending to spatial locations. Percept Psychophys. 1980 Sep;28(3):241–248. doi: 10.3758/bf03204380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Crick F. Function of the thalamic reticular complex: the searchlight hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Jul;81(14):4586–4590. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.14.4586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fischer B., Breitmeyer B. Mechanisms of visual attention revealed by saccadic eye movements. Neuropsychologia. 1987;25(1A):73–83. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(87)90044-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hikosaka O., Wurtz R. H. Modification of saccadic eye movements by GABA-related substances. II. Effects of muscimol in monkey substantia nigra pars reticulata. J Neurophysiol. 1985 Jan;53(1):292–308. doi: 10.1152/jn.1985.53.1.292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Mesulam M. M. A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect. Ann Neurol. 1981 Oct;10(4):309–325. doi: 10.1002/ana.410100402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Moran J., Desimone R. Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. Science. 1985 Aug 23;229(4715):782–784. doi: 10.1126/science.4023713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mountcastle V. B. Brain mechanisms for directed attention. J R Soc Med. 1978 Jan;71(1):14–28. doi: 10.1177/014107687807100105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mountcastle V. B., Motter B. C., Steinmetz M. A., Sestokas A. K. Common and differential effects of attentive fixation on the excitability of parietal and prestriate (V4) cortical visual neurons in the macaque monkey. J Neurosci. 1987 Jul;7(7):2239–2255. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.07-07-02239.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Petersen S. E., Robinson D. L., Keys W. Pulvinar nuclei of the behaving rhesus monkey: visual responses and their modulation. J Neurophysiol. 1985 Oct;54(4):867–886. doi: 10.1152/jn.1985.54.4.867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Petersen S. E., Robinson D. L., Morris J. D. Contributions of the pulvinar to visual spatial attention. Neuropsychologia. 1987;25(1A):97–105. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(87)90046-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Posner M. I. Orienting of attention. Q J Exp Psychol. 1980 Feb;32(1):3–25. doi: 10.1080/00335558008248231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Posner M. I., Walker J. A., Friedrich F. A., Rafal R. D. How do the parietal lobes direct covert attention? Neuropsychologia. 1987;25(1A):135–145. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(87)90049-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Posner M. I., Walker J. A., Friedrich F. J., Rafal R. D. Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention. J Neurosci. 1984 Jul;4(7):1863–1874. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.04-07-01863.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Prinzmetal W., Presti D. E., Posner M. I. Does attention affect visual feature integration? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1986 Aug;12(3):361–369. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.12.3.361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sagi D., Julesz B. Enhanced detection in the aperture of focal attention during simple discrimination tasks. Nature. 1986 Jun 12;321(6071):693–695. doi: 10.1038/321693a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Treisman A. M., Gelade G. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cogn Psychol. 1980 Jan;12(1):97–136. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES