Abstract
Light-induced isomerization of the 11-cis-retinal chromophore in the visual pigment rhodopsin triggers displacement of the second extracellular loop (EL2) and motion of transmembrane helices H5, H6, and H7 leading to the active intermediate metarhodopsin II (Meta II). We describe solid-state NMR measurements of rhodopsin and Meta II that target the molecular contacts in the region of the ionic lock involving these three helices. We show that a contact between Arg1353.50 and Met2576.40 forms in Meta II, consistent with the outward rotation of H6 and breaking of the dark-state Glu1343.49-Arg1353.50-Glu2476.30 ionic lock. We also show that Tyr2235.58 and Tyr3067.53 form molecular contacts with Met2576.40. Together these results reveal that the crystal structure of opsin in the region of the ionic lock reflects the active state of the receptor. We further demonstrate that Tyr2235.58 and Ala1323.47 in Meta II stabilize helix H5 in an active orientation. Mutation of Tyr2235.58 to phenylalanine or mutation of Ala1323.47 to leucine decreases the lifetime of the Meta II intermediate. Furthermore, the Y223F mutation is coupled to structural changes in EL2. In contrast, mutation of Tyr3067.53 to phenylalanine shows only a moderate influence on the Meta II lifetime and is not coupled to EL2.
Keywords: G protein-coupled receptor, solid-state NMR spectroscopy, ERY motif
Rhodopsin, the vertebrate photoreceptor for vision under dim light, belongs to the large, pharmaceutically important superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). The photoreactive chromophore in rhodopsin is the 11-cis-isomer of retinal, which is covalently linked to Lys2967.43 [superscripts denote Ballesteros–Weinstein numbering (1)] on the intradiscal (or extracellular) side of the receptor. Absorption of light drives the 11-cis- to trans-isomerization of the retinal within a tight binding pocket. The conformational changes that occur in this process must be transmitted through the membrane-spanning portion of the bilayer to the intracellular surface in order to open up the binding site for the heterotrimeric G protein, transducin. The crystal structure of the dark, inactive state of the visual pigment rhodopsin (2) reveals a tightly packed bundle of seven transmembrane (TM) helices but offers few clues as to how the helices move upon light activation.
Site-directed spin-labeling studies by Hubbell and coworkers (3, 4) showed that the largest change in the seven-TM-helix bundle involves an outward rotation of helix H6, consistent with an increase in volume of the receptor upon activation (5). The challenge for obtaining a high-resolution structure of the active metarhodopsin II (Meta II) intermediate has been that light activation causes the dark-state crystals of rhodopsin to dissolve (6), suggesting that the structural changes are sufficiently large to disrupt crystal packing. Salom et al. (7) were able to determine the crystal structure to 4.15-Å resolution of a photointermediate of rhodopsin containing retinal with a deprotonated Schiff base (SB) (7). The structure did not exhibit the large helix motions characteristic of the activated receptor, suggesting that this intermediate corresponds to the Meta II substate (Meta IIa) formed prior to helix motion (8).
More recently, Park et al. determined the structure of opsin (9). Opsin is formed when the Meta II intermediate decays and releases the agonist all-trans-retinal from the retinal-binding site. Opsin has low (≤ 1%), but detectable, basal activity in rod outer segment cell membranes (10). At pH 4, FTIR difference spectra of opsin exhibit vibrational bands characteristic of Meta II (11), suggesting that opsin adopts an active conformation. The crystals of opsin obtained at pH 6 appear to retain many features characteristic of the active state (Fig. 1). In fact, the most recent crystal structure of opsin (12) contains the bound C-terminal peptide of the Gα subunit of transducin in a conformation similar to that observed in solution NMR studies on the activated Meta II intermediate (13, 14).
One of the most striking features of the opsin structure is that the ionic lock involving Glu1343.49-Arg1353.50 of the conserved ERY sequence on H3 and Glu2476.30 on H6 is disrupted (Fig. 1B). The opsin structure reveals an outward motion of H6, similar in magnitude (∼6 Å) to the change observed by spin-labeling studies (3). Arg1353.50 is extended toward Met2576.40, Tyr2235.58, and Tyr3067.53. Both Tyr2235.58 and Tyr3067.53 have strong sequence identity in the class A GPCRs. Tyr3067.53 is part of a cluster of highly conserved residues on the cytoplasmic side of H7 and is thought to impart stability of the inactive receptor (15). Tyr2235.58 is unusual in that it is oriented away from the helical bundle in the inactive, dark receptor but rotates in toward the ionic lock in the opsin crystal structure. Whereas Tyr3067.53 of the NPxxY sequence has been characterized extensively, the only evidence that Tyr2235.58 plays a critical role in receptor activation comes from the opsin structure.
Solid-state NMR spectroscopy provides a unique way of following the structural transitions from rhodopsin to Meta II (16, 17) by allowing measurements in a fluid membrane environment, which facilitates the conformational changes associated with the formation of Meta II. The work to date has focused on the retinal-binding pocket. Here, we use solid-state NMR to determine the structure of the ionic lock in Meta II and fluorescence spectroscopy to characterize the rates of Meta II decay in mutants of rhodopsin where three highly conserved tyrosines (Tyr1363.51, Tyr2235.58, and Tyr3067.53) on the cytoplasmic side of the receptor have been sequentially mutated to phenylalanine. Our experiments on Meta II stability and transducin activation provide insights into the roles of these three conserved tyrosines. We show that Tyr2235.58 has a more substantial contribution to the stability of Meta II and transducin activation than either Tyr1363.51 or Tyr3067.53.
Results
The Open State of the Ionic Lock in Meta II.
The outward rotation of H6 observed in the opsin crystal structure places the side chain of Met2576.40 in close proximity to Arg1353.50. The 15N chemical shifts of the Nη1, Nη2, and Nε side-chain nitrogens and the 13C chemical shift of the Cζ carbon were measured to address the changes in the environment of Arg1353.50 upon Meta II formation. The arginine 15N chemical shifts are sensitive to the protonation state and environment of the guanidinium group (18), and one can envisage that when the interactions between Glu1343.49, Arg1353.50, and Glu2476.30 are broken, Arg1353.50 undergoes a change in electrostatic environment.
The 15N and 13C spectra of arginine-labeled rhodopsin and Meta II are presented in Fig. S1. There is no chemical shift resolution in the 15N resonances of the arginine Nη1, Nη2, and Nε nitrogens in either rhodopsin or Meta II, and there is only a slight (< 1 ppm) shift in the 13Cζ resonance. The lack of significant changes indicates that the protonation state of Arg1353.50 has not changed and suggests that the electrostatic environment surrounding Arg1353.50 is similar in the inactive and active states. These results suggest that either there are no large changes in the receptor structure as suggested by the crystal structure of the rhodopsin photoproduct with a deprotonated retinal SB or that disruption of the full charge–charge interactions within the Glu1343.49-Arg1353.50-Glu2476.30 ionic lock are compensated by partial charge interactions that result in no substantial change in the 15N or 13C chemical shifts of Arg1353.50.
In contrast to the lack of chemical shift changes in arginines, there are substantial changes observed in the chemical shifts of methionines. Fig. 2A presents the 13C NMR difference spectrum between13Cε-Met-labeled rhodopsin and Meta II. The negative 13C resonance at ∼15 ppm can tentatively be assigned to Met2576.40 in Meta II on the basis of its sensitivity to mutation of Tyr2235.58 and Tyr3067.53. To test for a direct Arg1353.50-Met2576.40 interaction in Meta II, we labeled rhodopsin with U-13C, 15N-Arg, and 13Cε-Met and measured internuclear Arg-Met distances by using 2D 13C dipolar-assisted rotational resonance (DARR) NMR. We do not observe Arg 13Cζ-Met 13Cε crosspeaks in the 2D DARR NMR spectrum of rhodopsin (Fig. 2B, black line) consistent with the rhodopsin crystal structure where no Arg Cζ-Met Cε carbon pairs are closer than ∼6 Å. In contrast, an Arg Cζ-Met Cε crosspeak is observed in Meta II (Fig. 2B, red line) that we tentatively assign to Arg1353.50-Met2576.40. In the opsin crystal structure, the Arg1353.50 Cζ-Met2576.40 Cε distance is 4.6 Å, within the range of this experiment. The putative Arg1353.50-Met2576.40 contact in Meta II correlates with the position of these two residues in the opsin crystal structure. The next closest Arg-Met pair is Arg1353.50 and Met2536.36, whose Cζ–Cε distance is 6.5 Å.
To further characterize the local environment of Arg1353.50 in Meta II, we targeted the two conserved tyrosines (Tyr2235.58 and Tyr3067.53) that appear to stabilize the ionic lock in an open conformation (Fig. 1B). The side-chain hydroxyl groups of Tyr2235.58 and Tyr3067.53 may act in concert to preserve the dark-state electrostatic environment of Arg1353.50.
Fig. 3 presents difference spectra generated by subtraction of the spectrum of wild-type rhodopsin from the spectrum of one of three tyrosine mutants (Y136F, Y223F, or Y306F). Only the region of the 13Cζ tyrosine resonances is shown. These spectra allow us to directly assign the 13Cζ tyrosine chemical shifts in rhodopsin and in Meta II. Both the Tyr2235.58 and Tyr3067.53 resonances shift downfield slightly upon activation to 156.2 and 155.9 ppm, respectively, reflecting an increase in hydrogen bonding of the 13Cζ-OH group and indicating that both tyrosines are protonated and in a similar environment in Meta II. For comparison, the difference spectrum of Y136F is shown in Fig. 3A. The 13Cζ chemical shift of Tyr1363.51 does not change upon activation.
To establish if direct Tyr2235.58-Met2576.40 and Tyr3067.53-Met2576.40 contacts occur in Meta II, we obtained 2D DARR NMR spectra of wild-type (black line) and mutant (red line) rhodopsin 13C labeled at 13Cε-methionine and 13Cζ-tyrosine (Fig. 4). In rhodopsin, rows taken through the Met-Cε diagonal resonance of the DARR spectrum reveal crosspeaks between Tyr191EL2-Met2887.35 at 156.8 ppm and Tyr2686.51-Met2887.35 at 155.2 ppm (17). In the dark, both Tyr191EL2 and Tyr2686.51 participate in a network of hydrogen-bonding interactions that help to position the second extracellular loop (EL2) deep within the retinal-binding pocket. The observation that neither of these crosspeaks change upon substitution of Tyr2235.58 or Tyr3067.53 is consistent with a native-like inactive conformation being adopted by both mutants.
In the rows corresponding to wild-type Meta II, a shoulder appears at ∼156 ppm (Fig. 4 B and D, red line), consistent with the chemical shifts of Tyr2235.58 and Tyr3067.53 observed in Fig. 3. This shoulder is lost upon mutation of either Tyr3067.53 or Tyr2235.58. These data confirm the proximity of Met2576.40 to both Tyr3067.53 and Tyr2235.58 in Meta II. In turn, these results place both tyrosine side chains in close proximity to the active state position of Arg1353.50.
Tyr2235.58 Stabilizes the Active Meta II Intermediate.
The lack of chemical shift changes in the arginine 15N and 13C resonances (Fig. S1) suggests that the electrostatic environment around Arg1353.50 does not change appreciably upon activation. This observation along with the NMR structural data on Meta II showing that Tyr2235.58 and Tyr3067.53 surround Arg1353.50 suggests that these residues interact with one another and contribute to the stabilization of the active Meta II conformation. To address the role of these tyrosines in Meta II stability, we monitored the decay of Meta II by fluorescence spectroscopy.
Fig. 5 presents fluorescence data on the decay of Meta II in wild-type rhodopsin and the Y223F mutant. For wild-type rhodopsin, fluorescence increases in the transition from Meta II to opsin. The fluorescence changes are associated with a loss of an interaction between Trp2656.48 and the retinal chromophore that quenches tryptophan fluorescence in Meta II (19). When plotted as a function of time after illumination, the fluorescence increase can be fitted to a single exponential function. For the Y223F mutant, the fluorescence intensity reaches a maximum after 400 s corresponding to a fivefold increase in the Meta II decay relative to the wild-type receptor. For comparison, mutation of either Tyr1363.51 or Tyr3067.53 to phenylalanine increases Meta II decay by less than a factor of 2 (Table 1). These data suggest that Tyr2235.58 has a greater contribution to Meta II stability than either Tyr1363.51 or Tyr3067.53.
Table 1.
Meta II decay (n = 3) | Transducin activation (n = 2) | |||
Half-life, min |
Normalized decay rate, % of wild type |
Normalized initial rate, % of wild type |
Normalized fluorescence increase, % of wild type |
|
Wild-type | 14.8 ± 0.3* | 100 ± 2.1* | 100 ± 7.1* | 100 ± 4.1* |
Y136F | 12.5 ± 0.9 | 118 ± 8.6 | 149 ± 16.9 | 106 ± 3.4 |
Y223F | 3.2 ± 0.2 | 466 ± 29.0 | 6 ± 1.5 | 5 ± 2.9 |
Y306F | 10.5 ± 0.6 | 140 ± 8.1 | 84 ± 7.4 | 72 ± 2.2 |
A132L | 3.8 ± 0.3 | 386 ± 31.0 | 69 ± 1.2 | 34 ± 6.2 |
A132S | 9.3 ± 1.2 | 159 ± 20.9 | 31 ± 8.2 | 63 ± 2.8 |
*Mean ± standard error.
We tested the ability of the three tyrosine mutants (Y136F, Y223F, and Y306F) to activate the G protein transducin (Table 1). For the Y223F mutant, there is a large decrease in both the initial rate of transducin activation and the maximum level of activation as compared to wild-type rhodopsin (as revealed by the normalized fluorescence increase, Table 1), consistent with the rapid hydrolysis of the all-trans-retinal SB in the formation of opsin.
For the Y136F mutant, we observed that Meta II stability was similar to wild-type rhodopsin. However, the initial rate of transducin activity was significantly (1.5×) higher. In a previous study, it was found that a nearby rhodopsin retinitis pigmentosa mutant (V137M) also displayed elevated (1.25×) initial rates of transducin activation (20). In the case of Y136F, we do not observe an associated increase in SB hydrolysis, suggesting that the structural consequences of this mutation are limited to the cytoplasmic side of the receptor. The analogous tyrosine has been the focus of several studies in other class A GPCRs, such as the vasopressin receptor (21) and CCR3 (22), where a conservative substitution blocks signaling while maintaining native-like ligand affinity.
Further support for the role of Tyr2235.58 in stabilizing Meta II comes from FTIR measurements obtained at lower temperature (Supporting Information). Analysis of vibrational band intensities characteristic of Meta I and Meta II shows that the Meta I ⇔ Meta II equilibrium is strongly shifted to the Meta I state in the Y223F mutant (Fig. S2).
Ala1323.47 Orients Tyr2235.58 in Meta II.
One helix turn from Arg1353.50 into the receptor core is the group-conserved Ala1323.47. Group-conserved residues generally have low conservation when considered individually but are highly conserved when considered as a group consisting of amino acids with small or weakly polar side chains, namely, Ala, Gly, Ser, Thr, and Cys. These residues have a high propensity to mediate TM-helix interactions (23) and have been shown to allow interaction of the signature residues in the class A GPCRs (24). Position 3.47 has the highest level of group conservation within this group (99%). In the crystal structure of opsin, the large rotation of Tyr2235.58 places its aromatic side chain in van der Waals contact with Ala1323.47. The rapid decay of Meta II upon mutation of Tyr2235.58 is similar to that previously observed for mutation of Glu1223.37 (25). Glu1223.37 hydrogen bonds with His2115.46 on the extracellular side of the receptor in Meta II and is thought to hold H5 in an active orientation (26). The His2115.46-Glu1223.37 pair is conserved in the high-sensitivity rod cell pigments and distinguishes them from the lower-sensitivity cone pigments. The question arises as to whether there is a similar pairwise stabilizing interaction between Tyr2235.58 and Ala1323.47 on the intracellular side of the receptor.
To test this hypothesis, we mutated Ala1323.47 to Leu and Ser and measured Meta II decay by tryptophan fluorescence. These data reveal an increased rate of Meta II decay (Table 1) suggesting that a larger side chain at position 1323.47 does not allow Tyr2235.58 to form a stabilizing interaction with Arg1353.50. The observed increase in the rate of Meta II decay in the A132L mutant is consistent with a lower activity of the Meta II state.
The Y223F Mutation Causes Structural Changes in EL2.
The shift in the Meta I ⇔ Meta II equilibrium and faster Meta II decay of the Y223F mutant suggest that the changes introduced by this mutation are allosterically coupled to the extracellular side of the receptor. This hypothesis is in agreement with the coupling of EL2 and H5 motion during activation (17). Meta II decay is defined by hydrolysis of the SB. There are several amino acids on or near EL2 on the extracellular side of rhodopsin that can modulate SB hydrolysis (27), including Glu1133.28 (28). We propose that the position of EL2 is linked to the position of Glu1133.28 and SB hydrolysis.
To characterize whether the mutation of Tyr2235.58 or Tyr3067.53 is coupled to structural changes in EL2, we expressed the Y223F and Y306F mutants with 13Cβ-labeled cysteine. The cysteine Cβ-spectrum provides a probe for changes in the highly conserved Cys1103.25 and Cys187EL2 disulfide bond. The β-carbon resonances in cysteines are observed in a unique chemical shift window (34–50 ppm) and are sensitive to the secondary structure: 34–43 ppm for α-helices and 36–50 ppm for β-sheets. We previously observed strong crosspeaks between the Cys1103.25-Cys187EL2 β-carbon resonances at 36.4 and 46.8 ppm in the dark, respectively (17). These resonances do not change position in the Y223F or Y306F rhodopsin spectra.
Fig. 6 presents rows from the 2D DARR NMR spectra of Meta II of the Y223F (blue line) and Y306F (green line) mutants labeled with 13Cβ-cysteine as compared to wild-type Meta II (red line). In contrast to the comparison with dark rhodopsin, there is a shift of the Cys187EL2 resonance in the Meta II spectrum of the Y223F mutant compared to wild-type Meta II. In wild-type Meta II, the Cys187EL2 resonance shifts to 50.1 ppm because of a change in the conformation of EL2, whereas the chemical shift of Cys1103.25 on helix H3 does not change (17). In the Y223F mutant, the Cys187EL2 resonance moves upfield to 48.2 ppm (Fig. 6A). Fig. 6C shows the crosspeak associated with Cys1103.25. This crosspeak does not shift in the Y223F mutant, confirming that the influence of the mutation is localized to EL2. In the Y306F mutant (Figs. 6 B and D), the crosspeaks associated with Cys1103.25 and Cys187EL2 are at the same position as in wild-type Meta II, indicating that there is no coupling between the NPxxY sequence and the conserved cysteine disulfide.
Discussion
The current study addresses several open questions regarding how retinal isomerization on the extracellular side of rhodopsin is coupled to the cytoplasmic ionic lock. We show that the interactions of Arg1353.50 with Met2576.40, Tyr2235.58, and Tyr3067.53 observed in the opsin crystal structure are also present in the active Meta II intermediate, consistent with the outward rotation of H6 (9, 12). Mutational studies indicate that the Arg1353.50-Tyr2235.58 interaction, which is facilitated by group-conserved Ala1323.47, has a strong influence on the stability of the active state conformation.
Defining the Open and Closed States of the Glu1343.49-Arg1353.50-Glu2476.30 Ionic Lock.
The ionic lock was originally described as a conserved hydrophobic cage motif in the gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor at the cytoplasmic end of H3 involving Asp3.49, Arg3.50, and Ile3.54 (29). Ballesteros et al. (29) proposed that a salt bridge between Asp3.49 and Arg3.50 stabilizes the inactive receptor and that upon activation Asp3.49 becomes protonated with the charged Arg3.50 side chain being prevented from orienting toward the cytoplasmic surface by Ile3.54. A more complex ionic lock involving the interaction of Arg3.50 with both Asp3.49 and Glu6.30 was based on the observation of increased basal activity in the D3.49N and E6.30Q mutants of the β2 adrenergic receptor (30). In the past few years, however, the crystal structures of the adenosine A2a (31) and β1 (32) and β2 (33) adrenergic receptors have been determined and, in contrast to rhodopsin, show no direct interaction between Arg3.50 and Glu6.30, although the Asp3.49-Arg3.50 salt bridge is retained.
Our results provide insights into the nature of the closed and open states of the ionic lock. Table S1 presents a summary of the conservation of the residues contributing to the ionic lock in rhodopsin and Meta II. There is a strong conservation of Glu/Asp (90%) at position 3.49 and Arg (97%) at position 3.50. In contrast, Glu2476.30 is not well conserved (33%) across the class A GPCRs, implying that there are various mechanisms for stabilizing inactive conformations. In the β1 and β2 adrenergic receptors, the position of Arg3.50 is stabilized by a tyrosine on cytoplasmic loop 2, whose conservation in the amine subfamily (85%) is as high as the conservation of Glu6.30 (83%). The conservation of two different residues that may stabilize Arg3.50 in the amine receptors suggests that there may be multiple inactive states as seen in molecular dynamics (MD) simulations (34) or that these residues have other functions in the regulation of receptor activity (35).
Table S2 summarizes the conservation of residues stabilizing the active conformation of Arg1353.50. The conservation of Tyr2235.58 (86%) is striking because it is oriented toward the lipid in the dark state of rhodopsin, implying that it has only protein contacts in the active state. In contrast, Met at position 6.40 is not conserved in the class A GPCRs yet plays an important role in stabilizing the inactive conformation of rhodopsin (see below). Together, these observations support the view that the Glu1343.49-Arg1353.50 salt bridge is the essential interaction for stabilizing the inactive state of class A GPCRs (36). Neutralization of Glu1343.49, rather than breaking of the Arg1353.50-Glu2476.30 salt bridge, is key to shifting the receptor to its active conformation where the conserved interactions are between Arg3.50, Tyr5.58, and Tyr7.53, as observed in Meta II and the crystal structure of opsin.
Met2576.40 Stabilizes Rhodopsin in the Inactive State.
We had previously observed that most site-directed mutants of Met2576.40 allow opsin activation by the addition of all-trans-retinal as a diffusible ligand (37). The observation that Met2576.40 shifts into contact with Arg1353.50 in the H3–H6 interface provides an explanation for the Met2576.40 mutations and the role of Met2576.40 in activation. The Met2576.40 mutants with the highest constitutive activity are M257Y, M257N, and M257S. The polar side chains at position 6.40 in these mutants interact more strongly with Arg1353.50 than the hydrophobic Met side chain and consequently stabilize the active state. In other class A GPCRs (Table S2), the β-branched amino acids (Thr, Ile, and Val) are the most common residues observed at position 6.40. When substituted into rhodopsin (37), these residues do not confer appreciable constitutive receptor activity (4.4–9.6%) but do allow almost full activation (62–83%) upon the addition of all-trans-retinal. These results indicate that, rather than stabilizing the active state, Met2576.40 stabilizes the inactive state of the receptor. If Met2576.40 is not stabilizing the Meta II structure, the question arises as to the relative stabilizing effects of Tyr2235.58 and Tyr3067.53. When these two tyrosines are mutated individually to phenylalanine, our measurements of transducin activation and Meta II decay indicate that Tyr2235.58 plays a much greater role in stabilizing Meta II than Tyr3067.53.
Ala1323.47 Serves as a Molecular Notch for Tyr2235.58.
In the class A GPCRs, there are 13 group-conserved residues that are located mainly in the interfaces between helices H1–H4 (24). Importantly, Ala1323.47 does not fit this pattern. Ala1323.47 is located on H3 but oriented toward the H5–H6 interface. The results described above, in combination with the opsin structure, provide an explanation for the high group conservation (99%) of this residue. Whereas the group-conserved amino acids mainly mediate helix–helix interactions in the inactive state of rhodopsin, Ala1323.47 acts as a molecular notch to orient the Tyr2235.58 side chain efficiently toward Arg1353.50 and stabilize the active Meta II intermediate (Fig. 1).
Alanine is highly conserved (68% identity) at position 3.47 in the rhodopsin subfamily of class A GPCRs. In the amine subfamily this site is predominantly a serine (68% identity). In the β2-adrenergic receptor, we previously studied the influence of substitution of the group-conserved amino acids in the TM-helix core with larger hydrophobic residues (38). Substitution of the wild-type Ala at position 3.47 with Leu or Val dramatically lowered receptor activity, whereas Ser at position 3.47 exhibited wild-type activity, suggesting that the role of Ala1323.47 in rhodopsin is likely the same across the class A GPCRs. In the recent crystal structures of both the β2-adrenergic and A2a receptors, Tyr5.58 has rotated toward Ala3.47, as in activated opsin. This active orientation for Tyr5.58 may be due to the T4 lysozyme (T4L) insert between H5 and H6 used to crystallize both receptors. Comparison with the wild-type receptors shows that the T4L insert results in higher affinity for subtype-selective agonists, which the authors suggest may reflect a shift toward the active state (31, 33). In addition, MD simulations of the β2 receptor without the T4L insert show rapid formation of the Arg3.50-Glu6.40 interaction (34). In the β1 receptor, which was not crystallized with the T4L insert, Tyr5.58 was mutated to alanine as part of a suite of mutations engineered to stabilize the inactive conformation of the receptor (32).
Allosteric Coupling Across the Transmembrane Core of Rhodopsin.
Solid-state NMR measurements have previously suggested that the displacement of EL2 upon activation is coupled to rotation of H5 (17). The coupled motion of EL2 and H5 was based on mutational experiments where substitutions in EL2 resulted in structural changes in H5 (17). Here, we show that mutations in H5 (i.e., Y223F) result in structural changes in EL2 (i.e., Cys187EL2). In agreement with previous studies on Cys187EL2 (39), mutation of Tyr2235.58 does not affect the wild-type properties of rhodopsin in the dark but leads to a less stable Meta II intermediate upon activation. In wild-type rhodopsin at neutral pH, hydrolysis of the all-trans-retinal SB and loss of the retinal chromophore in the Meta II to opsin transition shifts the receptor to an inactive conformation (11). Inactive opsin is stabilized, at least in part, by electrostatic interactions involving Glu1133.28 and Lys2967.43 because mutation of either residue to a neutral amino acid increases constitutive receptor activity (40). Interestingly, in the active opsin structure (12), these residues do not interact directly but rather interact most closely with Cys187EL2 and Glu181EL2, respectively, on EL2. Coupling of the position of EL2 to the orientation of H5 in the Meta II to opsin transition would suggest that there is a role for Tyr2235.58 in both the opening and closing of the Arg1353.50-Glu1343.49 ionic lock.
In summary, the current study highlights the roles of several residues mediating the opening and closing of the ionic lock in rhodopsin activation. The observed active state contacts of Arg1353.50 with Met2576.40, Tyr2235.58, and Tyr3067.53 allow us to define the open conformation of the ionic lock. In particular, we show that a unique interaction between Tyr2235.58 and Ala1323.47 in the active Meta II intermediate can explain both the high sequence identity of Tyr2235.58 and the high group conservation of Ala1323.47 across the class A GPCRs.
Methods
Materials.
13C-labeled amino acids were purchased from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories.
Expression and Purification of 13C-Labeled Rhodopsin.
Stable tetracycline-inducible HEK293S cell lines containing the opsin (bovine) gene and its mutants was used to express rhodopsin. The expression and purification in n-dodecyl maltoside (DDM) have previously been described (16, 17).
Transducin Activity.
The reaction mixture containing mutant rhodopsin (20 nM) and transducin (250 nM) in 10 mM Tris, pH 7.2, 2 mM MgCl2, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and 0.012% (wt/vol) DDM was illuminated by using a 495-nm long pass filter at 20 °C with constant stirring. The reaction was initiated by the addition of 5 μM GTPγS, and the fluorescence was monitored for 2,000 s. The sample was excited at 295 nm (2 nm bandwidth) and emission was monitored at 340 nm (15 nm bandwidth) at 3-s intervals with an integration time of 2 s. Initial rates were calculated by using the data points collected over the first 60 s following GTP addition.
Fluorescence Spectroscopy.
Meta II decay was monitored by using a fluorescence-based assay (19). Rhodopsin (250 nM) was illuminated by using a 495-nm long pass filter at 20 °C in 10 mM 1,3-bis[tris(hydroxymethyl)methylamino]propane, pH 6 containing 0.1% (wt/vol) DDM. The fluorescence was monitored every 30 s for 7,200 s by using a 2-s integration time. Samples were excited at 280 nm (2 nm bandwidth) and emission measured at 330 nm (15 nm bandwidth).
Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy.
Solid-state 13C magic angle spinning spectra were acquired at a static magnetic field strength of 14.1 T (600 MHz) on a Bruker AVANCE spectrometer as previously described (16, 17). NMR spectra were obtained at 190 K by using rhodopsin or Meta II solubilized in DDM.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health–National Science Foundation instrumentation grants (S10 RR13889 and DBI-9977553), National Institutes of Health Grant GM-41412 (to S.O.S.), and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Grant Za 566/2-1 (to E.Z.) and Grant Vo 811/4-1 (to R.V.). We gratefully acknowledge the W.M. Keck Foundation for support of the NMR facilities in the Center of Structural Biology at Stony Brook.
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1009405107/-/DCSupplemental.
References
- 1.Ballesteros JA, Weinstein H. Integrated methods for the construction of three dimensional models and computational probing of structure-function relations in G-protein coupled receptors. Methods Neurosci. 1995;25:366–428. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Palczewski K, et al. Crystal structure of rhodopsin: A G protein-coupled receptor. Science. 2000;289:739–745. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5480.739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Altenbach C, Kusnetzow AK, Ernst OP, Hofmann KP, Hubbell WL. High-resolution distance mapping in rhodopsin reveals the pattern of helix movement due to activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:7439–7444. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0802515105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Farrens DL, Altenbach C, Yang K, Hubbell WL, Khorana HG. Requirement of rigid-body motion of transmembrane helices for light activation of rhodopsin. Science. 1996;274:768–770. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5288.768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lamola AA, Yamane T, Zipp A. Effects of detergents and high-pressures upon metarhodopsin I↔metarhodopsin II equilibrium. Biochemistry. 1974;13:738–745. doi: 10.1021/bi00701a016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Okada T, Palczewski K. Crystal structure of rhodopsin: Implications for vision and beyond. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2001;11:420–426. doi: 10.1016/s0959-440x(00)00227-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Salom D, et al. Crystal structure of a photoactivated deprotonated intermediate of rhodopsin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:16123–16128. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0608022103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Knierim B, Hofmann KP, Ernst OP, Hubbell WL. Sequence of late molecular events in the activation of rhodopsin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:20290–20295. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0710393104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Park JH, Scheerer P, Hofmann KP, Choe HW, Ernst OP. Crystal structure of the ligand-free G-protein-coupled receptor opsin. Nature. 2008;454:183–187. doi: 10.1038/nature07063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jäger S, Palczewski K, Hofmann KP. Opsin/all-trans-retinal complex activates transducin by different mechanisms than photolyzed rhodopsin. Biochemistry. 1996;35:2901–2908. doi: 10.1021/bi9524068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Vogel R, Siebert F. Conformations of the active and inactive states of opsin. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:38487–38493. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M105423200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Scheerer P, et al. Crystal structure of opsin in its G-protein-interacting conformation. Nature. 2008;455:497–502. doi: 10.1038/nature07330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kisselev OG, et al. Light-activated rhodopsin induces a structural binding motif in G protein α subunit. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:4270–4275. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.8.4270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Koenig BW, et al. Structure and orientation of a G protein fragment in the receptor bound state from residual dipolar couplings. J Mol Biol. 2002;322:441–461. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(02)00745-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Fritze O, et al. Role of the conserved NPxxY(x)(5,6)F motif in the rhodopsin ground state and during activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:2290–2295. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0435715100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ahuja S, et al. Location of the retinal chromophore in the activated state of rhodopsin. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:10190–10201. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M805725200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ahuja S, et al. Helix movement is coupled to displacement of the second extracellular loop in rhodopsin activation. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2009;16:168–175. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Petkova AT, et al. Arginine activity in the proton-motive photocycle of bacteriorhodopsin: Solid-state NMR studies of the wild-type and D85N proteins. Biochemistry. 1999;38:1562–1572. doi: 10.1021/bi981968z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Farrens DL, Khorana HG. Structure and function in rhodopsin. Measurement of the rate of metarhodopsin II decay by fluorescence spectroscopy. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:5073–5076. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.10.5073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Andres A, Garriga P, Manyosa J. Altered functionality in rhodopsin point mutants associated with retinitis pigmentosa. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003;303:294–301. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(03)00328-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hawtin SR. Charged residues of the conserved DRY triplet of the vasopressin V1a receptor provide molecular determinants for cell surface delivery and internalization. Mol Pharmacol. 2005;68:1172–1182. doi: 10.1124/mol.105.013359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Auger GA, Pease JE, Shen XY, Xanthou G, Barker MD. Alanine scanning mutagenesis of CCR3 reveals that the three intracellular loops are essential for functional receptor expression. Eur J Immunol. 2002;32:1052–1058. doi: 10.1002/1521-4141(200204)32:4<1052::AID-IMMU1052>3.0.CO;2-L. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Eilers M, Patel AB, Liu W, Smith SO. Comparison of helix interactions in membrane and soluble α-bundle proteins. Biophys J. 2002;82:2720–2736. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75613-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Smith SO. Structure and activation of the visual pigment rhodopsin. Annu Rev Biophys. 2010;39:309–328. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-101209-104901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Imai H, et al. Single amino acid residue as a functional determinant of rod and cone visual pigments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:2322–2326. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.6.2322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Patel AB, et al. Changes in interhelical hydrogen bonding upon rhodopsin activation. J Mol Biol. 2005;347:803–812. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.01.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Janz JM, Farrens DL. Role of the retinal hydrogen bond network in rhodopsin Schiff base stability and hydrolysis. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:55886–55894. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M408766200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sakmar TP, Franke RR, Khorana HG. Glutamic acid-113 serves as the retinylidene Schiff base counterion in bovine rhodopsin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989;86:8309–8313. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.21.8309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ballesteros J, et al. Functional microdomains in G-protein-coupled receptors—the conserved arginine-cage motif in the gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:10445–10453. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.17.10445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ballesteros JA, et al. Activation of the β2-adrenergic receptor involves disruption of an ionic lock between the cytoplasmic ends of transmembrane segments 3 and 6. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:29171–29177. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M103747200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Jaakola VP, et al. The 2.6 Angstrom crystal structure of a human A2A adenosine receptor bound to an antagonist. Science. 2008;322:1211–1217. doi: 10.1126/science.1164772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Warne T, et al. Structure of a β1-adrenergic G-protein-coupled receptor. Nature. 2008;454:486–491. doi: 10.1038/nature07101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Rosenbaum DM, et al. GPCR engineering yields high-resolution structural insights into β2-adrenergic receptor function. Science. 2007;318:1266–1273. doi: 10.1126/science.1150609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Dror RO, et al. Identification of two distinct inactive conformations of the β2-adrenergic receptor reconciles structural and biochemical observations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:4689–4694. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0811065106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Baltensperger K, et al. The β-adrenergic receptor is a substrate for the insulin receptor tyrosine kinase. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:1061–1064. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.2.1061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Vogel R, et al. Functional role of the “ionic lock”—an interhelical hydrogen-bond network in family a heptahelical receptors. J Mol Biol. 2008;380:648–655. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.05.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Han M, Smith SO, Sakmar TP. Constitutive activation of opsin by mutation of methionine 257 on transmembrane helix 6. Biochemistry. 1998;37:8253–8261. doi: 10.1021/bi980147r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Chelikani P, et al. Role of group-conserved residues in the helical core of β2-adrenergic receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:7027–7032. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702024104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Davidson FF, Loewen PC, Khorana HG. Structure and function in rhodopsin: Replacement by alanine of cysteine residues 110 and 187, components of a conserved disulfide bond in rhodopsin, affects the light-activated metarhodopsin II state. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:4029–4033. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.9.4029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Cohen GB, Oprian DD, Robinson PR. Mechanism of activation and inactivation of opsin: Role of Glu113 and Lys296. Biochemistry. 1992;31:12592–12601. doi: 10.1021/bi00165a008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.